# 2023-140 Careers, Counselling and Probation, Remedial Measures
Counselling and Probation (C&P), Remedial Measures
Case summary
F&R Date: 2024-07-12
The grievor challenged the imposition of counselling and probation (C&P) since, in his opinion, it was not administered in accordance with Defence Administrative Orders and Directive (DAOD) 5019-4, Remedial Measures. The grievor stated that the description of the events leading up to the remedial measure was inadequate and did not enable him to understand the actions that he was accused of. In addition, follow-ups did not take place during C&P.
No decision from the Initial Authority was issued, as the grievor requested that his file be forwarded to the Final Authority (FA).
The Committee found that the level of detail included in the C&P concerning the allegations against the grievor was inadequate, compromising the clarity and transparency necessary to help him remedy his conduct deficiencies. In addition, the monitoring period did not comply with the procedures established by DAOD 5019-4, since it was restricted to three months, whereas it should have been at least six months. The Committee determined that the grievor had not received any follow-up, constructive feedback or adjustments during this short period. The Committee found that it was appropriate to cancel the C&P in the grievor's file in order to ensure compliance with established procedures and to ensure fair and responsible management.
The Committee recommended that the FA remove the C&P from the grievor's file.