Archived - Decision 05-001 Canada Labour Code Part II Occupational Health and Safety

Archived information

Archived information is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Bell Canada
(employer)

and

Daniel Bissonnette
applicant
___________________________
Decision No. 05-001
4 January 2005

This case was heard by appeals officer Richard Lafrance.

For the applicants

Alain Paradis – health and safety representative
Syndicat des communications, de l'énergie et du papier (CTM-FTQ-CTQ)
Alain Portelance – President
Syndicat des communications, de l'énergie et du papier (CTM-FTQ-CTQ)
Daniel Bissonnette
Employee

For the employer

Reno Vaillancourt – legal counsel for Bell Canada
Yves Darcy – assistant director, labour relations

Health and safety officer

Jessica Tran, Labour Program, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Montreal [No. QC8864]

[1] This case concerns an appeal filed on 7 November 2003 pursuant to subsection 129(7) of the Canada Labour Code (the Code), Part II, by Daniel Bissonnette, an employee of Bell Canada (employer).

[2] This appeal was filed following a decision of no danger rendered by health and safety officer Jessica Tran after her inquiry into the refusal to work by Daniel Bissonnette.

[3] At the first hearing on 22 September 2004, officer Tran presented her report and related the facts and circumstances as she perceived them at the time of her investigation.

[4] The reason for refusal to work was described in officer Tran's report as follows:

"The fact the employer is obliging me to come to work is harmful to my health because I am still in the process of being cured. The employer is also ignoring my attending physician's recommendations to the effect that I am not currently in a fit state to work because of my state of health."

[5] Daniel Bissonnette was then examined by his representative and described the situation that led him to exercise his right of refusal to work.

Due to a lack of time to complete Daniel Bissonnette's cross-examination, the rest of the hearing was postponed to a later date.

[6] On 17 December 2004, the date set for the continuation of the hearing, the parties met with each other before the start of the hearing and settled their differences.

[7] After this meeting, Alain Paradis, Daniel Bissonnette's representative confirmed in writing on 20 December 2004 that the employee was withdrawing his appeal.

[8] As the appeals officer in this case, I confirm, as a result of Mr. Bissonnette's decision not to pursue his appeal and after examining the file, that this case is closed.



_______________________
Richard Lafrance
Appeals Officer


Decision Summary

Decision No.: 05-001
Applicant: Alain Paradis
Alain Portelance
Daniel Bissonnette
Key Words: Refusal to work, appeal, medical condition
Provisions: Code 129(7)
Regulations
Summary:

The applicant appealed a decision of no danger rendered by a health and safety officer, following his refusal to work. The applicant subsequently withdrew his appeal and the appeals officer declared the case closed.

Page details

Date modified: