Archived - Decision: 08-027 Canada Labour Code Part II Occupational Health and Safety
Archived information
Archived information is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
Case No.: 2005-19
Decision No.: OHSTC-08-027
Mike Coene
appellant
and
Canada Border Services Agency
respondent
October 8, 2008
This case was decided by Appeals Officer Richard Lafrance.
For the appellant
Andrew Raven, Counsel, Raven, Cameron, Ballantyne & Yazbeck
For the respondent
Richard Fader, Counsel, Treasury Board, Legal Services
[1] This case concerns an appeal made by Mr. Mike Coene on June 20, 2005, pursuant to subsection 129(7) of the Canada Labour Code, Part II (the Code). The appeal was against a decision of absence of danger rendered on June 16, 2005, by Health and Safety Officer (HSO) Lindsay Harrower following her investigation of the refusal to work of M. Coene on June 16, 2005, pursuant to section 128 of the Code.
[2] According to the refusal to work statement, M. Coene refused to work because he felt that the conditions of work a the border crossing where he was assigned to work were dangerous because there was no armed presence at the work place nor was he scheduled to immediately begin firearms training.
[3] On completion her investigation, HSO Harrower determined, pursuant to subsection 129(4) of the Code, that a danger did not exist.
[4] On October 1, 2008, the Occupational Health and Safety Tribunal Canada received a letter from Mr. Andrew Raven, Counsel for the appellant to advise that he had received instruction from M. Coene to request that his appeal be withdrawn.
[5] Considering the above and having reviewed the file, I accept the withdrawal and declare this case closed.
Richard Lafrance
Appeals Officer
Summary of Appeals Officer Decision
Decision: OHSTC-08-027
Appellant:Mike Coene
Respondent: Canada Border Services Agency
Provisions: Canada Labour Code: Part II 128, 129(4) and 129(7)
Keywords:Refusal to work, definition to danger, training & equipment, policy, absence of danger, appeal, withdrawal.
Summary:
On June 20, 2005, Mike Coene appealed a decision of absence of danger rendered verbally by Health and Safety Officer Lindsay Harrower on June 16, 2005. On October 1, 2008, Andrew Raven, Counsel for M. Coene, informed the Occupational Health and Safety Tribunal Canada that M. Coene no longer wished to pursue his appeal. The case is therefore close.
Page details
- Date modified: