| s |
Evaluation Recommendations |
Management Response(eg. agree; disagree; agree with conditions) |
Management Action Plan |
Deliverables |
Expected Completion Date (For Each Deliverable) |
Responsibility (Position) |
Accountability |
Resources |
| 1 |
Continue monitoring threats to child health:It is recommended that CAPC continue monitoring threats to child health so as to inform implementation and enable the program to adapt and respond to emerging health priorities. |
Agree |
- Assess these public health priorities to improve delivery and implementation of program activities and services.
|
- Conduct specific analyses and annual reviews of data gathered from on-going program monitoring and performance measurement tools (and additional surveillance data) to determine the contribution of CAPC on public health priority issue areas
|
|
Manager, Evaluation and Corporate Reporting Unit, Division of Childhood and Adolescence, Centre for Health Promotion |
Director General, Centre for Health Promotion |
N / A(Part of annual performance measurement contracting) |
| 2 |
Continue data collection to support planning, performance reporting and evaluation: It is recommended that the CAPC continue to collect on-going performance measurement data through the revised Integrated National Evaluation Tool (INET). |
Agree |
- Continue to collect and report on the INET for the renewal period (up to March 2012).
|
- Assess and revise the INET to incorporate emerging public health priorities
|
|
Manager, Evaluation and Corporate Reporting Unit, Division of Childhood and Adolescence, Centre for Health Promotion |
Director General, Centre for Health Promotion |
100K / Annual (Part of annual performance measurement contracting) |
- Projects to report on fiscal 2009-10 activities
|
|
- Manage receipt and verification of project data Aggregate national data and national reporting
|
|
- Aggregate national data and national reporting
|
|
| 3 |
Undertake further study to identify the most effective delivery models within the overall program design: It is recommended that core program objectives are reviewed to inform the identification of a program typology of interventions and services. This would enhance the identification of best practices and the development a national outcome evaluation strategy. |
Agree |
- Review and identify core program objectives and a typology of interventions and services to develop a national outcome evaluation strategy for CAPC.
|
- Review and establish core program objectives to allow for:
- Typology to inform best practices
|
|
Manager, Evaluation and Corporate Reporting Unit, Division of Childhood and Adolescence, Centre for Health Promotion |
Director General, Centre for Health Promotion |
TBD(Contingent on long-term decisions on community investments in maternal and child health) |
- Accept delivery of a contracted third party comprehensive recommendations report on CAPC evaluation
|
|
- Assess CAPC foundational outcome documentation:
- Logic model review
- Review of regional outcome evaluation strategies / reports
- Evaluation of best practices
|
|
- Establish annual national/ regional evaluation planning for CAPC
|
|
- Establish a CAPC evaluation strategy
|
|
| 4 |
Consider evaluation findings in decisions regarding future PHAC investments in child health: It is recommended that all results of this Summative evaluation, including key findings, conclusions, and limitations of the analysis be considered in the context of long-term decisions on future PHAC investments in child health. |
Agree |
- Assess key findings, limitations and recommendations to integrate into any learning to inform long-term decisions on community investments in child health within PHAC.
|
- Provide detailed briefing(s) and analysis to PHAC Senior Management to inform long-term programmatic decisions
|
|
Manager, Evaluation and Corporate Reporting Unit, Division of Childhood and Adolescence, Centre for Health Promotion |
Director General, Centre for Health Promotion |
TBD(Contingent on long-term decisions on community investments in maternal and child health) |
| 5 |
Consider findings on the economic benefits of early intervention and adequacy of current CAPC funding levels in decisions regarding future PHAC investments in child health: It is recommended that consideration be given to the economic benefits of early intervention as well as a review the economic realities of current CAPC funding levels to inform future PHAC investments in children's health. |
Agree |
- Assess key findings from economic analysis to be integrated into any learning to inform long-term decisions on community investments in child health within PHAC.
|
- Provide detailed briefing(s) and analysis to PHAC Senior Management to inform long-term programmatic decisions
|
|
Manager, Evaluation and Corporate Reporting Unit, Division of Childhood and Adolescence, Centre for Health Promotion |
Director General, Centre for Health Promotion |
TBD(Contingent on long-term decisions on community investments in maternal and child health) |
| 6 |
Position evaluation to meet the mandate of the 2009 Treasury Board Policy on Evaluation: It is recommended that any future evaluation of CAPC be positioned to meet the mandate of the 2009 Treasury Board Policy on Evaluation. |
Agree |
- Align CAPC evaluation into a broader PHAC evaluation strategy to respond the new Treasury Board mandate
|
- Create a Centre for Health Promotion (CHP) Evaluation and Planning Work Group including National and Regional representation
|
|
Manager, Evaluation and Corporate Reporting Unit, Division of Childhood and Adolescence, Centre for Health Promotion |
Director General, Centre for Health Promotion |
N/A |
- Provide DCA input to CHP evaluation priorities and work plan inclusive of any future requirements to demonstrate CAPC accountability
|
|
TBD(Contingent on long-term planning for evaluation) |
