ARCHIVED - Literature review on DTaP based penta- and hexavalent vaccines approved for clinical use in Canada

 

October 2006

(full PDF version 277 KB)

Prepared by:
Vladimir Gilca, Institut national de santé publique du Québec
Bernard Duval, Institut national de santé publique du Québec

With active collaboration of :
Shelley Deeks, Public Health Agency of Canada
Kevin Laupland, University of Calgary

This review was supported by Public Health Agency of Canada and by l’Institut national de santé publique du Québec.

Table of Contents

Tables


Introduction

In Canada, there are two manufacturers, Sanofi Pasteur and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), that supply three combined pentavalent vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (DTaP), polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), and one manufacturer (GSK) that supplies a hexavalent vaccine against the above mentioned infections plus hepatitis B.

Given the specific goal of this report, data on combined DTaP based vaccines approved for use in infants in Canada were analysed. Trade names of vaccines are used to minimize product confusion : Pentacel® (Sanofi Pasteur); Pediacel® (Sanofi Pasteur); InfanrixTM-IPV/Hib (GSK); and InfanrixTM-hexa (GSK).

A modified version of the analytical framework for immunization programs in Canada (Erickson L and De Wals P, 2005)1, section “Vaccine characteristics” was used for the purpose of this report. Issues including the burden of disease, ethical, legal and political considerations, as well as eventual immunization programs in Canada go beyond the objectives of this report. On several occasions, comparisons with similar vaccines not used in Canada, but used in other countries, were done. Data are presented for each antigen of each vaccine.

This report is based on scientific peer-reviewed published data.

References:

1. Erickson LJ, De Wals P, Farand L. An analytical framework for immunization programs in Canada. Vaccine 2005;23(19):2470-6.

Literature review on DTaP based penta- and hexavalent vaccines
approved for clinical use in Canada

(full PDF version 277 KB)

Page details

2017-06-20