Long descriptions

Exhibit 5.1: Post-Secondary Recruitment Appointments from 1973 to 2009

Appointments
Year Number of Appointments
1973 961
1975 1,122
1980 443
1990 1,529
2000 656
2005 469
2006 550
2007 453
2008 984
2009 1,697

Source: PSC, Post-Secondary Recruitment to the Public Service (2002) and PSC Annual Reports

« Back to Exhibit 5.1

Exhibit 5.2: Accuracy of Assessment Provided Through PSR Tests (Valid Responses)

(If Recruited/Hired through the PSR Program)

"In your view, how accurate an assessment of applicants' abilities and skills are provided through each of the PSR standardized test?"

Accuracy of Assessment Provided Through PSR Tests (Valid Responses)
PSR Standardized Tests Not Accurate
(%)
Moderately Accurate
(%)
Highly Accurate
(%)
Written Communication Proficiency Test 11% 23% 66%
Graduate Recruitment Test 14% 29% 58%
Situational Judgment Test 17% 26% 57%

N=118

Source : EKOS Research Associates Inc.; Evaluation of the PSR Program (Wave 4), 2009

« Back to Exhibit 5.2

Appendix A: Logic Model / Intended Outcomes long description

The logic model identifies three main areas of activity for the PSR Program:

Each of these areas of activity results in a core output. The communication, outreach and marketing activities results in marketing tools, promotional activities and analyses of client satisfaction data. The testing and evaluating services results in tested and partially assessed candidates, candidate pools and inventories and referrals to clients. Finally, the program delivery and management activities result in environmental scans, expert advice to clients, reports on business metrics and business planning.

Immediate outcomes resulting from activities and outputs linked to communication, outreach and marketing are identified as:

Immediate outcomes resulting from activities and outputs related to testing and evaluation services are identified as:

Immediate outcomes resulting from activities and outputs related to program delivery and management are identified as:

Two sets of intermediate outcomes of the PSR Program can be identified. The first involves:

A second set of intermediate outcomes involve:

The ultimate outcome is identified as the PSR Program contributing to the Public Service Commission's role in ensuring a highly competent, non-partisan and representative public service, able to provide service in both official languages, in which appointments are based on the values of fairness, access, transparency and representativeness.

« Back to Logic Model / Intended Outcomes

Appendix C: Perceptions of the Federal Public Service

"To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the federal public service?" (Open)

Perceptions of the Federal Public Service
Statements Recent Hires through PSR Program
(%)
Recent Hires through other methods
(%)
Potential recruits
(%)
Difficult to obtain a job in federal government through PSR Program 51% 45% 71%
Working in federal government offers a good work-life balance 84% 81% 69%
Federal government offers a wide variety of career jobs 88% 83% 67%
Process for getting into federal government is too long 86% 88% 65%
Federal government has opportunities for advancement 82% 77% 65%
Federal government offers interesting work 78% 75% 55%
Few positions of interest to me in federal government 18% 26% 45%
No federal government jobs in my region 20% 14% 32%

Source: EKOS Research Associates Inc.; PSR Program & Other Recruitmens in PS, 2009

« Back to Appendix C: Perceptions of the Federal Public Service

Appendix D: Importance of Various Job Aspects

"How important are each of the following when deciding what type of career you might want to pursue?"

Importance of Various Job Aspects
Job Aspects Recent Hires through PSR Program
(%)
Recent Hires through other methods
(%)
Potential recruits
(%)
Meaningful work 96% 95% 93%
Good work-life balance 88% 93% 91%
Working in location where want to live 77% 89% 89%
Attractive compensation 85% 89% 87%
Opportunities for career advancement 95% 93% 87%
Comprehensive benefits 81% 90% 82%
Job security 84% 91% 79%
Being given opportunity to be creative 78% 78% 78%
A pension 73% 83% 66%
Opportunity to work autonomously 67% 69% 62%
Prestige associated with the job 52% 46% 43%

Source: EKOS Research Associates Inc.; PSR Program & Other Recruitmens in PS, 2009

« Back to Appendix D: Importance of Various Job Aspects

Appendix E: Preferred Values and Goals in Shaping Federal Government

"If you were to direct the federal government as to which goals or values should be most important in shaping its direction, how important would you say each of the following goals or values should be?"

Preferred Values and Goals in Shaping Federal Government
Goals and Values Recent Hires through PSR Program
(%)
Recent Hires through other methods
(%)
Potential recruits
(%)
A healthy population 90% 91% 93%
Integrity 92% 95% 91%
A clean environment 88% 90% 90%
Innovation 89% 85% 87%
Collective human rights 84% 87% 83%
Social equality 81% 84% 81%
Tolerance for different people, cultures and ideas 83% 84% 78%
Security and safety 82% 87% 74%
Self-reliance 74% 76% 69%
Prosperity and wealth 73% 69% 64%
Canadian identity 69% 72% 62%
Equality among all regions of Canada 67% 66% 61%
Respect for authority 57% 63% 50%

Source: EKOS Research Associates Inc.; PSR Program & Other Recruitmens in PS, 2009

« Back to Appendix E: Preferred Values and Goals in Shaping Federal Government

Appendix F: Self-Rated Confidence and Perceptions of Risk-Taking

"To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?"

Self-Rated Confidence and Perceptions of Risk-Taking
Statements Recent Hires through PSR Program
(%)
Recent Hires through other methods
(%)
Potential recruits
(%)
I have confidence in my ability to recover from my mistakes, no matter how big 90% 92% 91%
I would choose a $3,000 annual raise over a $10,000 bonus if I had a 1 chance in 3 of getting the bonus 60% 61% 70%
I would rather feel intense disappointment than intense regret 60% 63% 69%
I tolerate ambiguity & unpredictability well 59% 58% 57%
I generally prefer stimulation over security 51% 51% 51%
If forced to choose between them, I would take safety over achievement 34% 50% 43%

Source: EKOS Research Associates Inc.; PSR Program & Other Recruitmens in PS, 2009

« Back to Appendix F: Self-Rated Confidence and Perceptions of Risk-Taking

Page details

2017-01-20