C-096 - Conduct Authority Decision

The Appellant appealed the decision of the Conduct Authority (Respondent) who found that he contravened section 4.6 of the Code of Conduct by engaging in an unauthorized pursuit of a stolen motor vehicle.

The Appellant submits that the Respondent’s decision is clearly unreasonable because the Respondent misapprehended relevant evidence, made unreasonable findings of fact and failed to provide sufficient reasons.

The ERC found that the Appellant did not establish that the Respondent misapprehended relevant evidence or made unreasonable findings of fact. The ERC also found that the Appellant did not establish that the Respondent provided insufficient reasons. The ERC found that the Respondent’s reasoning provides a clear understanding into his decision as well as a rational and tenable line of analysis supporting his findings.

The ERC recommended that the appeal be dismissed.

The Adjudicator agreed with the ERC Findings and Recommendations and as such, adopted the ERC Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as their reasons for concluding for that this appeal be dismissed.