Trends in Offender Grievances and Complaints, Fiscal Year 2019 to 2020 to Fiscal Year 2023 to 2024

Highlight: Counts of offender complaints and grievances have largely stabilized following a previous decline. Across offender subgroups, the most common subject of concern relates to staff interaction.

Number: RIB-25-12

Date: 2025

Alternative Format:

Why we are doing this study

As per the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (CCRA), offenders under the jurisdiction of the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) have access to an offender grievance process. The procedures and timelines for resolving offender grievances are laid out in Commissioner’s Directive (CD) 081 and Guidelines 081-1.

What we did

Grievances received in fiscal year 2019 to 2020 to fiscal year 2023 to 2024 were extracted from CSC’s Corporate Reporting System-Modernized (CRS-M). Analysis was undertaken for the 3 levels of the offender redress process (written complaints, initial grievances and final grievances) to explore thematic and procedural trends.

What we found

Over the last 5 fiscal years, the number of offender complaints and grievances remained lower and relatively stable compared to previous years (see: Motiuk & Arnet-Zargarian, 2019). The vast majority of cases (98%) were filed in relation to a federal correctional institution.Footnote 1   Alongside fluctuations in the average federal in-custody population, there was minimal variation in the average number of grievances per federal offender (see Table 1). Counts of offender complaints and grievances were consistently highest in the Quebec region (see Table 2). Median days to decision remained relatively consistent across the 5 year period (ranging from 37 to 41 days).

The 101,693 complaints and grievances between fiscal year 2019 to 2020 and fiscal year 2023 to 2024 corresponded with 14,375 unique offenders. A subset of offenders had a disproportionately high count of grievances (such as, 51 offenders accounted for 20% of all cases; when such cases were removed, there was a total of 81,275 grievances associated with 14,324 unique offenders).

The 2 most common categories of complaints and grievances included “interaction” (for example, staff performance, discrimination, harassment by staff), and “conditions/routine” (for example, personal effects, food and diet, institutional amenities), which together accounted for over half of all cases. These 2 categories remained the most common areas even when repetitious cases were excluded. There was considerable thematic overlap in the top categories and subjects in cases across men’s and women’s institutions and for different racial/ethnic groups. The subject of “staff performance” was consistently the most common subject area of concern (19% overall; 17% when repetitious cases were removed).

Table 1: Offender Complaints and Grievances, Fiscal Year 2019 to 2020 to Fiscal Year 2023 to 2024.

Fiscal Year

Measure

2019 to 2020

2020 to 2021

2021 to 2022

2022 to 2023

2023 to 2024

Avg. Offender Count

14,009

12,832

12,389

12,673

13,830

Count of Complaints and Grievances*

20,926

(17,159)

20,481

(17,021)

19,442

(15,737)

20,086

(15,387)

20,758

(15,971)

Avg. Per Offender

1.5 (1.2)

1.6 (1.3)

1.6 (1.3)

1.6 (1.2)

1.5 (1.2)

*Bracketed numbers exclude repetitious cases, defined as cases where the number of complaints was greater than 3 standard deviations above the mean (i.e., 140+; N = 51).

Table 2: Regional Distribution of Offender Complaints and Grievances, Fiscal Year 2019 to 2020 to Fiscal Year 2023 to 2024.

Region

Avg. Pop

Avg. Grievances*

Atlantic

1,177; 9%

6,342; 6% (5,955; 7%)

Quebec

2,679; 21%

33,265; 33% (22,742; 28%)

Ontario

3,603; 28%

20,767; 20% (17,064; 21%)

Prairie

3,831; 29%

19,672; 19% (17,742; 22%)

Pacific

1,774; 14%

21,267; 21% (17,469; 22%)

Total/ National

13,062; 100%

380; <1% (303; <1%)

*Bracketed numbers exclude repetitious cases, defined as cases where the number of complaints was greater than 3 standard deviations above the mean (i.e., 140+; N = 51).

What it means

Following a previous decline in offender complaints and grievances, counts have largely stabilized. Trends are influenced by repetitious cases as well regional differences. Cases tied to the subject of “staff performance” (a subcategory of “interaction”) are most common across institutions and offender subgroups. 

References

Motiuk, L. & Arnet-Zargarian, A. (2019). Offender Complaints and Grievances in Canadian Federal Corrections. Research in Brief, 19-14. Ottawa, ON: Correctional Service Canada.

For more information

Please email the Research Branch. You can also visit the Research Publications section for a full list of reports and one-page  summaries.

Prepared by: Laura McKendy and Jessica Lundy

Page details

2025-10-27