Appearance of the Commissioner before the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU): May 19, 2022

Table of Contents

1. Main and supplementary estimates

Overview note: 2021-2022 supplementary estimates “C”

On a portfolio-wide basis, total authorities sought in SEC would result in a net increase of $508.4M or 4.0% over current estimates. The approval of these Estimates would result in Public Safety (PS) Portfolio total authorities increasing to $13.2B.

Of the PS portfolio, CSC’s expenditures are the 3rd highest seeking $20.1M, or 0.6% of estimates to-date.

Final supplementary estimates “C” 2021-22: Portfolio overview
Department/Agency 2021-22 Mains 2021-22 TB central votes 2021-22 SEA 2021-22 Directed SEB 2021-22 Authorities to-date These Supplementary Estimates
SEC Proposed Authorities
PS 1,055,463,651 33,323,339 84,113,467 104,037,489 1,278,937,946 (64,502,863) 1,214,435,083
CBSA 2,049,476,541 366,535,723 8,624,063 12,377,000 2,437,013,327 187,735,783 2,624,749,110
CSIS 623,940,967 51,175,031 0 0 675,115,998 5,501,591 680,617,589
CSC 2,793,675,395 204,191,908 0 229,981,780 3,227,849,083 20,101,435 3,247,950,518
PBC 55,370,723 2,632,394 0 0 58,003,117 7,170,269 65,173,386
OCI 5,468,720 98,177 0 0 5,566,897 0 5,566,897
RCMP 3,439,673,110 1,265,897,957 230,300,000 78,138,426 5,014,009,493 352,410,442 5,355,419,935
ERC 6,432,998 0 0 0 6,432,998 0 6,432,998
CRCC 10,425,537 73,074 0 0 10,498,611 0 10,498,611
Total 10,039,927,642 1,925,927,603 323,037,530 424,534,695 12,713,427,470 508,416,657 13,221,844,127

CSC is anticipating to receive Treasury Board authority to increase its appropriations for:

CSC has $43.1M of funds available within authorities that have been frozen by Treasury Board including:

CSC has requested an internal transfer from capital to operating for $5.0M within its existing votes (net effect of zero) to adjust authorities as required for the Offender Management System Modernization Project.

CSC has transferred a total of ($8K) from its appropriations to other federal government organizations, through transfer of funds to the Treasury Board Secretariat for the Financial Community Developmental Programs and the Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility initiative.

Overview note: 2022-2023 main estimates

Ratification by Parliament of these Main Estimates will result in funding approvals of $11.0B for the Public Safety portfolio for fiscal year 2022-23. On a portfolio-wide basis, total authorities sought in the 2022-23 Main Estimates will result in a net increase of $950.0M or 9.5% over the 2021-22 Main Estimates.

Of the PS portfolio, CSC’s expenditures are the 2nd highest. The variance between these and the 2021-22 Main Estimates are: $257,052,067 for a percentage of 9.2%

Main estimates 2022-23: By organization
Department/Agencies Operating Capital G&C Statutory (Combined) Total
PS 201,130,701 - 657,505,982 18,595,792 877,232,475
CBSA 1,958,648,984 173,061,244 - 212,375,680 2,344,085,908
CSIS 591,723,683 - - 56,433,902 648,157,585
CSC 2,578,846,421 213,793,715 - 258,087,326 3,050,727,462
PBC 58,591,187 - - 6,904,740 65,495,927
OCI 4,880,918 - - 597,364 5,478,282
RCMP 2,797,965,686 262,730,335 428,273,483 492,558,242 3,981,527,746
ERC 5,801,194 - - 640,904 6,442,098
CRCC 9,376, 774 - - 1,099,875 10,476,649
Total 8,206,965,548 649,585,294 1,085,779,465 1,047,293,825 10,989,624,132

The net increase of $257.0M represents a net increase of $219.5M in Operating Expenditures, an increase of $26.0M in Capital Expenditures and a net increase of $11.5M in Statutory Expenditures (EBP).

The main factors contributing to the changes in funding levels include (but are not limited to):

Increases:

Decreases:

2021-2022 Financial Situation

2021-2022 Financial Situation: Operating Surplus (Shortfall)

Operating Surplus (Shortfall)

2021-2022

  • P3 or P4 approximately 20 million
  • P6 approximately 40 million
  • P8 approximately 60 million
  • P10 approximately 80 million
  • P11 approximately 100 million
  • P12 approximately 120 million

2020-2021

  • P3 or P4 approximately -40 million
  • P6 approximately -40 million
  • P8 approximately 10 million
  • P10 approximately 80 million
  • P11 approximately 100 million
  • P12 approximately 120 million

2019-2020

  • P3 or P4 approximately -20 million
  • P6 approximately -20 million
  • P8 approximately -20 million
  • P10 approximately 40 million
  • P11 approximately 40 million
  • P12 approximately 50 million

2018-2019

  • P3 or P4 approximately -20 million
  • P6 approximately 10 million
  • P8 approximately 40 million
  • P10 approximately 40 million
  • P11 approximately 40 million
  • P12 approximately 50 million
2021-2022 P12 Operating Surplus ($millions)
  Salary O&M Total
Regions 25.0 15.8 40.7
Health 10.4 3.5 13.9
Sectors 12.7 25.9 38.6
Centrally Managed* (4.0) 4.0 (0.1)
Reserve 16.8 15.1 31.8
Total 60.7 64.3 125.0

As of P12, there is a surplus in operating of $125.0M over and above the $106.7M frozen funds, mainly due to these surplus:

Capital surplus (shortfall)

Capital Surplus (Shortfall)

2021-2022

  • P3 or P4 approximately 0 million
  • P6 approximately 40 million
  • P8 approximately 40 million
  • P10 approximately 60 million
  • P11 approximately 80 million
  • P12 approximately 85 million

2020-2021

  • P3 or P4 approximately 25 million
  • P6 approximately 20 million
  • P8 approximately 60 million
  • P10 approximately 20 million
  • P11 approximately 20 million
  • P12 approximately 40 million

2019-2020

  • P3 or P4 approximately 0 million
  • P6 approximately 0 million
  • P8 approximately 0 million
  • P10 approximately 5 million
  • P11 approximately 10 million
  • P12 approximately 20 million

2018-2019

  • P3 or P4 approximately -30 million
  • P6 approximately 0 million
  • P8 approximately 0 million
  • P10 approximately 2 million
  • P11 approximately -2 million
  • P12 approximately 2 million

As of P12, there is a surplus on capital of $85.7M, including a $12.0M capital reprofile from last year. These surpluses are mainly due to delays in projects or purchases of equipment for various reasons like the availability of professionals, equipment and material, increase in costs, delay in procurement with PSPC and restricted access to the sites mainly due to the pandemic.

 

2. Financial Snapshot

Cost Structure and Constraints

  • Approximately 90% of CSC’s budget is non-discretionary, such as expenses related to:
  • Front-Line workforce / Collective Agreements; and
  • Statutory obligations.
  • Operational costs are largely fixed and related to both static and dynamic security.
  • In the context of Program Integrity, through Budget 2020, CSC received a positive response to its funding request following the comprehensive review.
  • At the time of the Supplementary Estimates C exercise, CSC’s financial situation was uncertain, as funding for COVID-19 was not yet confirmed, however this has now been addressed as part of Budget 2022.
  • CSC had an Operating Carry Forward of $96,9M, (2020-2021), 3.5% of its total authorities (2020-2021).
  • Changes to operations could produce savings, but would also have an impact on the results.

 

Distribution of Operating Budget

Distribution of Operating Budget

Other O&M, 11%

Includes the following items:

  • Legal Services and Claims Settlements
  • CORCAN Inmate Training
  • IM/IT

Salaries & EBP, 72%
Quasi-Statutory, 17%

3. CSC’s hot issues

2022 - 2023 Main estimates overview note

Proposed response:

Financial implications:

C-83 Funding:

Structured Intervention Units (SIUs): IAP Report

Proposed response:

If pressed: Successes

If pressed: Overrepresentation

If pressed: Mental health

Background: Structured Intervention Units (SIUs)

In November 2019, administrative segregation was abolished and CSC implemented a new, intervention-based correctional model called Structured Intervention Units (SIUs). SIUs allow CSC to separate inmates who cannot be safely managed within a mainstream inmate population while continuing to provide these inmates the opportunity to access rehabilitative programming and interventions. On a daily basis, inmates in an SIU:

There are 15 SIUs across the country, which are used for inmates who may be at risk, pose a risk to others or jeopardize the security of the institution. CSC works to provide inmates in an SIU with customized and targeted interventions to support their safe return to a mainstream inmate population as soon as possible.

For context, there is consistently less than 180 inmates in SIUs across the country on a daily basis - about 1.5 per cent of the total inmate population. This is approximately half of the inmates who were in administrative segregation in 2019. This reinforces that SIUs are being used sparingly, often as a last resort. Our results show a notable increase in the percentage of inmates who were transferred to SIUs who have since successfully reintegrated into the mainstream population, from 56 per cent last fiscal year to more than 66 per cent as of March 2022.

IAP Report

The IAP listed four main findings related to: SIU transfers and Indigenous inmates; consistency in regional approaches both in the use of SIUs and the length of stay; the application of offers for time out of cell and meaningful human contact; and the mental health of inmates. These are all areas that we are further examining to ensure we take any additional actions necessary.

Oversight

Additionally, there are effective safeguards in place, including through the Independent External Decision Makers (IEDMs) who provide oversight in specific circumstances on the decision to maintain or not maintain an inmate’s stay in an SIU as well as on their conditions of confinement while in these units. We implement their recommendations, and their decisions are binding.

While in an SIU, CSC actively makes offers to encourage inmates to spend time out of their cells. In addition, we are improving our data tools and real-time tracking of offers for time out of cell and whether inmates avail themselves of these offers. This helps us take more targeted and case-specific actions. We also consider the reasons why some inmates decline the opportunities offered to determine how to better support and engage them. CSC staff work to provide access to relevant programs and look for opportunities to offer meaningful interaction with others.

For example, at Atlantic Institution in New Brunswick, the Canadian Families and Corrections Network (CFCN) is offering the Dad Hero program to help inmates in an SIU build connections with their children and family. To encourage offenders to get out of their cell, an educator at Millhaven Institution in Ontario has implemented a Physical Education course: Health for Life. This program has changed offenders’ attitudes towards education and several inmates have successfully completed their high school diploma while in the SIU.

Finally, the decision to transfer an inmate to an SIU always includes consideration of the inmate's health needs. Within 24 hours of being transferred to an SIU, an inmate is referred to health services for a health assessment, including mental health. This is repeated at regular intervals. At the same time, we recognize the importance of ensuring that inmates with mental health challenges are placed in the most appropriate setting, where they can receive ongoing and timely care and interventions based on their needs.

Overrepresentation of BIPOC

Proposed response:

If pressed: Progress

If pressed: Indigenous Women

Indigenous Offenders

The Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) continues to see an increase in the proportion of federally sentenced Indigenous offenders. At the end of fiscal year 2020-2021, Indigenous offenders represented 31.6% of the total in custody population and Indigenous women offenders represented 43.2% of the total in custody women population.

CSC is working to respond to the disproportionate representation of Indigenous peoples in custody, through a variety of programs. The following are examples of such actions taken by the Service.

Indigenous Women Offenders

Since late December there have been articles published on data from Dr. Zinger detailing that the number of Indigenous women incarcerated in federal prisons continues to grow. On May 5, an article was published in the Globe and Mail detailing that 50% of female offenders are Indigenous.

The article also questioned progress on the creation of a Deputy Commissioner, Indigenous Corrections, highlighting its inclusion in the Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls’ (MMIWG) calls for justice. It is acknowledged that while CSC agreed to prioritize the hiring of a deputy commissioner for Indigenous corrections, the position is not yet filled.

CSC’s approach to working with Indigenous women is holistic, women-centred, and founded on the principles identified in the 1990 Creating Choices report, the 1997 National Strategy on Aboriginal Corrections, and the 2006-2011 Strategic Plan for Aboriginal Corrections. Creating Choices specifically advocated for the creation of a Healing Lodge for Indigenous women inmates that would focus on traditional healing practices in a culturally relevant environment. The opening of the Okimaw Ohci Healing Lodge (OOHL) in 1995 was a major milestone towards meeting the healing and reintegration needs of this unique population. OOHL provides culturally appropriate programming and traditional healing practices, facilitated by Elders and Spiritual Advisors. To better meet the needs of Indigenous women, the capacity of OOHL was expanded from 44 to 60 beds in 2016.

In September 2011, CSC and the Native Counselling Services of Alberta collaborated on the opening of the first section 81 facility for women, Buffalo Sage Wellness Centre, which provided 16 multi-level beds for women offenders with four beds designated as section 84 releases. In November 2017, the Agreement was expanded and an additional 12 beds were added for a total of 28 beds. (Section 81 of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act allows CSC to enter into an agreement with an Indigenous community for the provision of correctional services to Indigenous offenders.)

In July 2019, CSC signed an agreement with the Indigenous Women’s Healing Centre (IWHC)’s Eagle Women’s Lodge (EWL) to convert EWL from a Community Residential Facility (CRF) into a Healing Lodge. This agreement provides a greater number of women with timely access to beds in a Healing Lodge closer to their community. This multi-level facility will accommodate up to 30 women classified as minimum and, on a case-by-case basis, medium security and conditionally released federally sentenced women. 

Pathways Healing Units were established at Fraser Valley Institution, Edmonton Institution for Women and Grand Valley Institution to meet the healing and correctional needs of Indigenous women in preparation for either release to the community, or transfer to OOHL, or a section 81 healing lodge (i.e. Buffalo Sage Wellness Centre or Eagle Women’s Lodge). As of 2016, a full Women Offender Pathway Continuum was introduced at these three institutions to provide opportunities to women inmates at all three security levels to participate in the initiative. Also, in 2009, Nova Institution introduced an Aboriginal healing house that provides cultural interventions similar to those offered in Pathways Units.

Black Offenders

At the end of 2020-21, there were 8.6% of incarcerated offenders who had identified themselves as Black, while there were 7.1% of offenders supervised in the community did so. From 2016-2017 to 2020-2021, the proportional decrease of incarcerated Black offenders showed a decrease of 7.2%, in contrast to incarcerated Caucasian offenders which was 23.2%, and during the same period.

CSC reviewed how ethnocultural offenders are reintegrating in the community in terms of program participation, employment opportunities and successful completion of sentence. CSC invested $20,000 for this project, in addition to approximately a 1.5 full time employee equivalent from CSC’s Research Branch (combination of research managers, analysts and students). CSC used a combination of internal and external resources, in collaboration with Nipissing University.

Currently, Black offenders are offered varied interventions and services aimed at supporting their reintegration. These initiatives include:

Use of force (OCI Report)

Proposed response:

If pressed: Systemic Racism and Use of Force

If pressed: Engagement and Intervention Model

If pressed: Creating choices

Background - Use of force (OCI Report)

Under the provisions of the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (CCRA) (Part III), the Correctional Investigator (CI) serves as the Ombudsman for federal offenders. His primary responsibility is to independently investigate and facilitate resolution of offender issues.

The Annual Report for 2020-21 provides 20 recommendations, 16 of which are directed to CSC and the remaining four are directed to the Minister of Public Safety. Recommendations are centred around main themes: the overreliance and intersection between the use of force and systemic racism against Indigenous and Black individuals; strategies to better accommodate the rehabilitative needs of women; monitoring and reporting on stays within Structured Intervention Units (SIUs) as well as other forms of isolation; as well as treatment of offenders living with mental health challenges.

The OCI also provides updates on the progress being made on recommendations from previous Annual Reports, including addressing Sexual Coercion and Violence (SCV); facilitating access to harm reduction measures such as Overdose Prevention Sites (OPS) and Prison Needle Exchange Programs (PNEP), as well as use of force.

Uses of force involving federally incarcerated Black, Indigenous, Peoples of Colour and other vulnerable populations.

The report noted that despite accounting for 44% of the prison population, BIPOC individuals accounted for nearly 60% of all individuals involved in a use of force incident over the past five years. Conversely, White individuals accounted for 42% of people involved in a use of force event while representing 52% of the prison population. Additionally, 46% of all individuals involved in a use-of-force incident had a history of self-injury or attempted suicide.

Four recommendations regarding the use of force were made, including an evaluation of the Engagement and Intervention Model; use of inflammatory sprays; action plan to address use-of-force and systemic racism against Indigenous and Black Individuals; as well as tracking individuals with mental health concerns.

A Review of Women’s Corrections 30 Years Since Creating Choices

The OCI acknowledged the 30 year anniversary since the establishment of Creating Choices, which was meant as a “blueprint” for women’s federal corrections.

Through the Annual Report, the CI identifies nine issues in the progression of Creating Choices, which includes prisons being inadequate; oversecure; having poor programming; isolation from families; unable to meet the needs of Aboriginal and Francophone women; unable to integrate women into their communities to promote rehabilitation.

In response, the CI made recommendations such as increasing the role of temporary absences and work releases; developing a long-term strategy to prepare women at the earliest possibility; as well as the developing alternative accommodations for women housed in secure units.

Sexual coercion and violence

Proposed response:

Background: Sexual coercion and violence:

Over the years, CSC has taken a number of actions to address incidences of SCV. Here are a few examples of some of its actions:

Dry cells

Proposed response:

If pressed: Amendments

If pressed: Imposing a maximum number of days

If pressed: Other tools

Background: Dry cells:

The current Corrections and Conditional Release Act (CCRA) provision related to the use of dry cells must be amended to ensure that it complies with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter), following a Nova Scotia Supreme Court decision which struck down the provision as unconstitutional. The Court found section 51(b) of the CCRA unjustifiably violated section 15 of the Charter.

If an institutional Head is satisfied that that are reasonable grounds to believe that an inmate has ingested contraband, or is concealing contraband in a body cavity, section 51(b) of the CCRA permits CSC to place them in a dry cell - a cell that lacks plumbing fixtures, and is subject to continuous observation. The inmate remains in the dry cell until any suspected contraband is expelled or there is no longer a reasonable expectation that the contraband will be expelled.

As contraband in the vagina is not expelled in the same manner or at the same pace as contraband in the digestive tract, this leads to the potential for women to be subject to a longer dry cell placement, beyond durations faced by men.

As a result of this decision, Public Safety Canada and CSC are seeking amendments to the CCRA to ensure that provisions related to the use of dry cells comply with the Charter and address the Court’s decision in federal institutions across Canada.

The CCRA amendments seek to restrict detention in dry cells to where the institutional head has reasonable grounds to believe that an inmate has ingested contraband, or that contraband is being carried in the inmate’s rectum.

COVID-19 in federal corrections

Proposed response:

Background- COVID-19 in federal corrections

CSC implemented a number of measures to keep staff, offenders and the public safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. CSC was recently featured in a World Health Organization publication on best practices.

Cases among inmates

As of May 1st, 2022, there are 288 active COVID-19 cases among federal inmates across the country.

Since March 2020, CSC has had 4,855 positive inmate cases and six deaths in its institutions. CSC is transparent in its steadfast management of COVID-19 cases. As such, testing, positive cases, vaccination rates, and deaths are posted regularly on CSC’s website and updates are provided to stakeholders.

COVID-19 in federal institutions

All staff and inmates are equipped with level 2 medical masks. Based on the tasks being completed and an individualized assessment of risk, staff may also wear a respirator and additional PPE (ie: face shields, gowns and gloves). For example, staff who work with inmates who have tested positive for COVID-19 wear respirators and face shields.

CSC has also established measures to help prevent the spread of the virus within the institutions. Employees are required to do a rapid test at least every 48 hours while at work. For outbreak sites, they can test daily while on site and all individuals entering institutions are actively screened. When in-person visits are temporarily suspended, other options such as telephone calls and video visitations are available to inmates to connect with their family and support networks.

Medical isolation

CSC’s medical isolation guidelines were developed by health professionals and adhere to public health principles to prevent and contain COVID-19 outbreaks. The algorithms are constantly reviewed and updated as the pandemic progresses and changes. When inmates are in medical isolation, all reasonable efforts are made to provide the inmate opportunities to be out of their cell to attend activities of daily living (e.g., opportunity to shower), yard time, and access to telephone calls, with appropriate infection prevention and control measures in place. Medical isolation is meant to be the least restrictive possible while keeping inmates on individual routines to contain the spread of COVID-19.

Reduced staffing due to self-isolation

As there are increasing levels of community transmission of COVID-19 across regions, CSC regularly reviews its impact upon staffing levels for all institutions, to ensure appropriate resources are available to manage operational requirements and provide safe, humane care for the inmates in custody. There is a contingency plan, which indicates additional measures that can be taken to address a staffing level issue, such as approving staff overtime and having managers replace correctional officers, as needed. Currently, staffing levels at institutions are adequate to ensure the safe operations of the facilities.

Once a staff member tests positive for COVID-19, they will remain away from the workplace until it is deemed appropriate for them to return based on public health requirements and CSC’s guidelines for congregate living environments. CSC’s return to work protocols for asymptomatic high risk contacts meet or exceed provincial public health guidance in all cases. CSC has a protocol in place to return staff to the workplace if needed to maintain critical public safety services. The protocol meets or exceeds the local public health requirements in all provinces. The protocol focuses on returning asymptomatic staff who are isolating due to a high risk exposure and who have completed the majority of their 10 day isolation period together with ongoing rapid testing and additional work isolation measures.

Video visitation kiosks

To ensure offenders could maintain contact with their loved ones and support networks during the COVID-19 pandemic, CSC increased video visitation kiosks by 228%, with 117 dedicated video visitation kiosks and 70 multi-purpose kiosks that are also used to facilitate virtual health case interactions, interim offender program delivery, and legal proceedings. These are now available across the country. CSC also increased the bandwidth to support the use of video visits, and, at many sites, increased the hours during which video visits are available. This has resulted in a 300% increase in video visitation usage, with an average of 160 video visitation sessions held each day across the country in CSC’s institutions, a significant increase from the 41 sessions held on average daily pre-pandemic.

Penitentiary agriculture program

If pressed: Inmate pay

Background

The model for penitentiary farm operations at Joyceville and Collins Bay institutions was determined following a broad range of public consultations and review program, and includes dairy cow and dairy goat operations, in addition to land management, horticulture, and crop production.

Due to the unplanned financial challenges to address the global COVID-19 pandemic across the organization, CSC decided to focus its dairy operations on the dairy cow program and temporarily pause the implementation of the dairy goat operation. In the meantime, CSC will continue to engage with community members and stakeholders, and proceed with continuing to implement other aspects of the program and the dairy cow operations, including construction of a new barn at Joyceville Institution.

The penitentiary farm operations are being implemented in accordance with all relevant legislation and policy. Procedures are being integrated within the penitentiary farm operations that respect both provincial and federal government legislation and practices, and in accordance with industry standards, as it relates to farm animal welfare, and including appropriate biosecurity measures. Offenders are involved in building and renovating necessary infrastructure, as well as working to repair and rebuild farmland, in addition to crop production. The reopening of the farms represents a renewal of the penitentiary farms model that includes additional technical skills, certifications, and community partnerships. The farms provide on-the-job training, vocational certification, and employability skills that support offenders in their reintegration.

There is forthcoming construction of a new dairy cow barn at Joyceville Institution. The contract for the construction of the correctional farm for dairy cows was awarded March 11, 2022 and published on buyandsell.gc.ca.

Current and future operations

The land size at Collins Bay and Joyceville institutions includes land that buildings are located on, woodlots, sugar bush, orchard, greenspace and other uses. Thus, the total size between the two sites is approximately 860 acres of workable land. Since the implementation commenced in 2018, crop production, horticulture, beekeeping, forestry management, maple syrup production have all been implemented at both sites. In addition, small livestock operations of beef cattle and the commencement of building the dairy cattle herd have also occurred. Cattle are housed at Collins Bay Institution and pastured at both sites when appropriate.

Furthermore, to provide a variety of land based activities, CSC’s offender employment program includes crop production at both sites as well as offenders at both institutions are involved in growing vegetables for their own consumption, as well as for donation to local food banks. This model incorporates land based activities that result in items for internal use, donation, as well as opportunities to generate revenues that will be reinvested into the offender employment and employability program.

Offenders have had the opportunity to participate in the agriculture program learning both technical and transferable skills through theory and practical learning models. These areas continue to be enhanced and CSC is working with environmental initiatives and agriculture groups to continue building a program that represents the diverse nature of agriculture in Canada. The full implementation of the dairy cattle operations, along with other environmental and land based activities will further enhance the program to provide employment and employability skills to the program participants.

Sale of products

The sale of products generated through the agriculture program will be determined by internal use requirements, agreements and contracts signed as implementation occurs and products are available. The diversified penitentiary agriculture program activities, including both livestock and land based elements, contribute to offender learning and provide the opportunity to represent various parts of the broad spectrum of agriculture activities in Canada. CSC will continually be re-evaluating its operations as the plan is executed and will be taking into account elements such as sustainability and market availability, noting that dairy cow milk will be managed in accordance with Canada’s system of supply management for this product. All revenues generated will be reinvested into the offender employment and employability program.

Hazard pay for Correctional Officers

Proposed response

Background hazard pay

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, certain groups of front line workers have been recognized by what is known as “hazard pay” - increased financial benefits for those whose work brought them a greater risk of contracting the virus.

Due to the fact that prison environments are congregate living settings and physical distancing harder to maintain, the union of correctional officers (UCCO-SACC-CSN) has claimed that its Correctional Officers have faced an increased risk of transmitting the COVID-19 virus due to outbreaks in CSC’s institutions. As such, the union has sought similar financial pay for its employees.

While Correctional Officers employed by CSC do not receive hazard pay, the unique risks and challenges of working in a penitentiary workplace have been factored into the overall assessment of working conditions for the CX classification group and included as factors within the overall salary levels for such workers. Additionally, vaccination campaigns for both employees and offenders are ongoing, while public health protocols continue to be assessed and improved as necessary in order to limit the introduction and transmission of this virus.

TBS has extended additional paid leave to all employees (699 leave) since the beginning of the pandemic, including Correctional Officers, to respond to the unique COVID-19 challenges and impacts on employees. To date, TBS has not approved the union’s request for pandemic/hazard pay.

Contraband detection

If pressed on Air Ground Intrusion Detection System

If pressed on Body Scanners

Background

CSC has a zero tolerance approach to illicit drug trafficking and works with its employees to take appropriate action to prevent, detect and apprehend all contraband using a range of tools.

UCCO has expressed concerns publicly about the accessibility of illicit drugs in institutions as well as the pace of adopting new technology such as body scanners and drones to reduce their availability. Such technology would enhance the ability of officers to detect and seize contraband, while also respecting the dignity, gender considerations, as well as the cultural and religious practices of the person being searched.

Body scanners were introduced via former Bill C-83: Transforming Federal Corrections. Work has been done to draft the regulatory amendments that will provide details as to when and how the Service will use body scanners. Pre-publication in the Canada Gazette, of the proposed regulatory amendments, is anticipated by March 2023. This will allow all stakeholders to be formally consulted prior to its coming into force. In the interim, body scanners have been delivered and installed to Bath Institution, in Ontario, and at Edmonton Institution for Women.

On the issue of drone detectors, they are used in all regions of the country and a number of high profile seizures have occurred over the past year. CSC has allocated $6 million over the next few years for the implementation of its pilot drone detection program. The pilot project will deploy new drone detection systems over the next three years. Once in service, our teams will measure the performance of these systems.

Additionally, CSC is working to further enhance its technology and ground detection systems to prevent contraband introduction. A ground detection system will be piloted at Donnacona Institution (Quebec Region). This particular institution was selected as it has a high number of reported sightings of drones. Equipment delivery and installation is scheduled to begin in May and the trial period will begin in August 2022.

Prison Needle Exchange Program

Proposed response

If pressed: UCCO concerns

If pressed: Additional sites

Background: Prison Needle Exchange Program

In June 2018, CSC implemented a Prison Needle Exchange Program (PNEP) at two institutions: Grand Valley Institution for Women in Kitchener, Ontario (a multi-level women’s institution) and Atlantic Institution in Renous, New Brunswick (a maximum security men’s institution).

The objectives of the PNEP are: to reduce sharing of non-sterile needles; to increase opportunities to provide health teaching, health promotion and treatment; to reduce transmission of blood borne viral infection including HIV and HCV; and to reduce the occurrence of skin infections related to injection drug use

PNEP is currently implemented at nine federal institutions:

Grand Valley Institution (June 2018); Atlantic Institution (July 2018); Fraser Valley Institution (January 2019); Edmonton Institution for Women (February 2019); Nova Institution (March 2019); Joliette Institution (May 2019); Joyceville Institution Minimum (September 2019), Mission Institution Medium (November 2019); and Dorchester Penitentiary Medium (December 2019).

In addition PNEP implementation readiness has been completed at another 2 sites (Bowden Institution and Warkworth Institution) although program launch has been delayed at these sites due to the demands of the COVID-19 pandemic response.

The PNEP has continued to be available at these 9 sites throughout the pandemic. Individuals can submit a request to participate in the PNEP at any of the nine institutions and participation rates vary over time and across sites.

CSC has gained experience managing inmates using needles in a safe and secure manner with its existing programs for EpiPens and insulin use for diabetes. A Threat Risk Assessment model similar to the one currently in effect for EpiPens and insulin needles is used to determine if there are substantive security risks that would prohibit an offender from participating in the program. This could include, for example, a history of assaults with improvised weapons within the institution. Staff training and ongoing engagement with bargaining agents and other partners will help ensure safe and successful implementation.

Once enrolled in the PNEP, an inmate can exchange the entire PNEP kit for a new one as needed. Appropriate safeguards are established in every institution to ensure that PNEP kits are safely stored and accounted for.

PNEP participants are not exempt from rules against the possession and consumption of contraband, including illicit drugs.

PNEP Evaluation

Dr. Lynne Leonard from the University of Ottawa was engaged by CSC to conduct a rigorous scientific evaluation of the PNEP program and delivered an interim report in October 2020. The report provided several recommendations to improve the needle exchange program.

PNEP Consultations with bargaining agents

CSC has been engaging with all three bargaining agents, the Union of Safety and Justice Employees, the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada and the Union of Canadian Correctional Officers/Syndicat des Agents Correctionnels du Canada/Confédération des Syndicats Nationaux, and partners, on the implementation of the PNEP at the local, regional and national levels. At the institutions where the PNEP has been implemented, the implementation pathway involved engagement with institutional staff including the three bargaining agents, distribution of written information to staff and inmates and information sessions with staff, management, Citizen Advisory Committees, inmate committees, Workplace Health and Safety Committees and others. The same approach will continue as CSC continues its roll out of the PNEP at other institutions across the country.

Overdose Prevention Service

CSC received a jurisdictional exemption from section 56(1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act from Health Canada in May 2019 in order to operate an Overdose Prevention Service (OPS). The OPS has the same objectives as the PNEP; however it is different in that participants are allowed to bring a personal amount of illicit drug to the site for consumption under the observation of a health care professional.

The first OPS was launched at Drumheller Institution on June 24, 2019. There have been 1,470 visits to the OPS between July 10th, 2019 and December 8th, 2021. Subject to completion of required changes and when the pandemic allows for additional sites to be implemented, additional OPS sites are scheduled for implementation at Springhill Institution, Atlantic Region and Collins Bay Institution (medium security unit), Ontario Region.  While there are overlapping goals between the PNEP and the OPS, the primary difference is that the OPS is intended to prevent overdose deaths by having health care professionals present during the use of substances who can respond to medical emergencies.

4. Key facts and figures

Employee numbers

In total, CSC employs approximately 18,621 staff from a vast number of fields.

As of May 11, 2022, CSC’s front-line staff workforce included:

CSC results

5. Issues recently raised at SECU

Radicalized offenders

Article: CBC

On April 29, 2022, an article published in the CBC reports on a “top-secret” report alleging that two national security lawyers tasked by the RCMP and CSIS with making recommendations to deal with information-sharing bottlenecks in the national security intelligence sphere have expressed concern over "the lack of coverage over persons convicted of terrorism offences once they are in jail."

One of the recommendations was that CSC should “communicate more” with the RCMP and CSIS. An academic interviewed for the article dismissed the concerns averring that “patriotism” within the inmate population is not conducive to the spread of extremism while “hierarchies” might actually be keeping extremism in check.

Background

The Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) defines radicalized offenders as “ideologically motivated offenders, who commit, aspire or conspire to commit, or promote violent acts in order to achieve ideological objectives”. Radicalization to violent extremism is not a new phenomenon in federal corrections. CSC currently manages, and has managed in the past, various offenders who fall under CSC’s definition of a radicalized offender.

CSC's definition of radicalized offender does not focus on any specific ethnic or cultural group or religious denomination. While these offenders present CSC with some unique challenges stemming from their ideologically-based motivations, CSC is well positioned to manage any threats posed through existing security mechanisms, intelligence analysis, risk assessment, consultation with external partners and robust dynamic security practices.

CSC collaborates with Public Safety Canada portfolio agencies, and other partner agencies, through the sharing of information and intelligence regarding terrorists and violent extremists (radicalized offenders). Specifically, CSC works closely with Public Safety Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service on national security issues.

Security Threat Groups: General

Mental health and essential healthcare

Identification cards

Mother - Child Program

Residential component: Eligibility and requirements

Non-residential component

Number of participants to the Mother-Child Program by fiscal year (Source: Data Warehouse, 2021-04-11)
FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21
7 17 12 17 15 9

6. CSC infrastructure

Infrastructure

Institutions for women: 5
Institutions for men: 34

  • Minimum: 2
  • Medium: 9
  • Maximum: 6
  • Multi level/clustered: 17

Aboriginal Healing Lodges: 4

  • Men: 3
  • Women: 1

Community Correctional Centres: 14
Parole and sub-parole offices: 92

Pacific

8 Institutions

  • Minimum: 2
  • Medium: 2
  • Maximum: 1
  • Multi level/clustered: 3

14 Parole and sub-parole offices
1 Community Correctional Centre
RHQ: Abbotsford

Prairie

12 institutions

  • Minimum: 3
  • Medium: 1
  • Maximum: 1
  • Multi level/clustered: 7

19 Parole and sub-parole offices
2 Community Correctional Centres
RHQ: Saskatoon

Ontario

8 Institutions

  • Medium: 2
  • Maximum: 1
  • Multi level/clustered: 5

23 Parole and sub-parole offices
2 Community Correctional Centres
RHQ: Kingston
NHQ: Ottawa

Quebec

10 Institutions

  • Medium: 3
  • Maximum: 2
  • Multi level/clustered: 5

17 Parole and sub-parole offices
6 Community Correctional Centres
RHQ: Laval

Atlantic

5 Institutions

  • Medium: 1
  • Maximum: 1
  • Multi level/clustered: 3

19 Parole and sub-parole offices
3 Community Correctional Centres
RHQ: Moncton

OCI Recommendations 2012-2020: Completion Rate

2012-2013 = 99%
2012-2014 = 100%
2014-2015 = 100%
2015-2016 = 100%
2016-2017 = 100%
2017-2018 = 91%
2018-2019 = 63%
2019-2020 = 23%

Compliance with Office of Correctional Investigator Recommendations

OCI Recommendations 2012-2020
OCI Recommendations 2012-2020

OCI recommendations 2012-2020: Completion rate

  • 2012-2013 = 99%
  • 2013-2014 = 100%
  • 2014-2015 = 100%
  • 2015-2016 = 100%
  • 2016-2017 = 100%
  • 2017-2018 = 91%
  • 2018-2019 = 63%
  • 2019-2020 = 23%

Update:

The OCI Liaison Unit in Policy Sector continues to collaborate with other Sectors and Regions to coordinate and monitor the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) ’s response to the OCI ARs.

As of December 9, 2021, a total of 97 of 106 recommendations have been completed for the above-noted ARs.

Outstanding Recommendations

Community supervision funding

Note, this does not contain 2021-22 data yet as the year is not finalized and the reallocation of expenditures still needs to be completed.

This table demonstrates in the upper section that Community expenditures are at 6% - however bring in the CPORF components under Community, a strategy that the Commissioner has used in prior presentation, thus representing 11.3% of CSC’s expenditures, and demonstrating an increase from 2017-18 at $292.3M to 2020-21 to $330.6M.

Current numbers of participants in women’s sites (March-April 2022 Submissions from the sites)
Institution Number of children
Nova 0
Joliette 3 (2 Part-time, 1 Full-time)
GVI 0
EIFW 1 (Full-time)
OOHL 0
FVI Footnote *

Return to footnote *No submission since September 2021. referrer

 

Report builder: Canada
Allotment All appropriations
Project All Project
Line Object: All Object All Object
Entity All Entity
Measure Actual (YTD)
Date 05-July-2021
Userid session X0XGQA949
Table 1: Report builder: Community (RESP & Centrally Managed)
Community centres 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021
Program Inventory 2020-2021 $2,628,111,979 100.0% $2,589,320,065 100% $2,652,821,435 100% $2,931,216,086 100%
CR1-Care and Custody $1,695,534,841 64.5% $1,664,493,616 64.3% $1,669,389,184 64.3% $1,875,093,281 64.0%
CR2-Correctional Interventions $438,244,603 16.7% $432,616,375 16.7% $452,591,211 16.7% $495,803,539 16.9%
CR3-Community Supervison $160,381,208 6.1% $166,107,821 6.4% $173,361,655 6.4% $172,006,751 5.9%
ISC-Internal Services $333,951,327 12.7% $326,102,253 12.6% $357,479,385 12.6% $388,312,515 13.2%
Table 2: Report builder: Community (RESP & Centrally Managed)
Community centres 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021
Program Inventory 2020-202 $292,300,204 11.1% $292,772,379 11.3% $301,425,629 11.4% $330,629,470 11.3%
CR2-Correctional Interventions (CPORF) $86,536,618 - $83,417,311 - $84,955,785 - $97,421,851 -
CR2-Correctional Interventions $36,640,731 - $34,717,178 - $34,417,469 - $51,645,133 -
CR3-Community Supervision $160,381,208 - $166,107,821 - $173,361,655 - $172,006,751 -
ISC-Internal Services $8,741,647 - $8,530,068 - $8,690,721 - $9,555,735 -
*Including all Community Responsibility Centres, Regional Centrally Managed Responsibility Centres related to community and National Centrally Managed under cc 622 (CPORF)

7. Committee overview

Committee membership profile

Jim Carr (Chair)
Pam Damoff (PS) (previous member)
Sameer Zuberi
Taleeb Noormohamed
Paul Chiang

Liberal

 

Raquel Dancho (Vice-Chair)
Dane Lloyd
Tako Van Popta (previous member)
Doug Shipley (previous member)

Conservative

 

Kristina Michaud (Vice-Chair) (previous member)

Bloc Quebecois

 

Alistair MacGregor (Vice-Chair)

New Democratic Party

House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU)

Liberal Party of Canada

Photo: Jim Carr (Chair)

Jim Carr
(Committee Chair)

Winnipeg - South Centre, Manitoba

  • Elected to Parliament in 2015
  • Former Minister of Natural Resources; Minister of International Trade; Special Representative for the Prairies.
Photo: Pam Damoff

Pam Damoff

Oakville North - Burlington, Ontario

  • Elected to Parliament in 2015
  • Current Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety
  • Of interest to CSC: Asked specifically about the Mother-Child program.
Photo: Sameer Zuberi

Sameer Zuberi

Pierrefonds - Dollards, Quebec

  • Elected to Parliament in 2019
  • Of Interest to CSC: Zuberi has spoken about relationships between security agencies and members of racialized communities.
Photo: Taleeb Noormohamed

Taleeb Noormohamed

Vancouver - Granville, British Columbia

  • Elected to Parliament in 2021
Photo: Ron MacKinnon

Ron MacKinnon

Coquitlam - Port Coquitlam, British Columbia

  • Elected to Parliament in 2015
  • Former Chair of the Standing Committee on Health (HESA)
Photo: Paul Chiang

Paul Chiang

Markham - Unionville, Ontario

  • Elected to Parliament in 2021

Conservative Party of Canada (CPC)

Photo: Raquel Dancho (Vice-Chair)

Raquel Dancho
(Vice-Chair)

Kildonan - St. Paul, Manitoba

  • Elected to Parliament in 2019
  • Of interest to CSC: Spoke against Bill C-5 (repeal of certain MMPs). Has raised questions with witnesses about supervision and incarceration.
Photo: Doug Shipley

Doug Shipley

Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte Ontario

  • Elected to Parliament in 2019
Photo: Dane Lloyd

Dane Lloyd

Sturgeon River—Parkland Alberta

  • Elected to Parliament in 2017
  • Of interest to CSC: Asked about how prisons can facilitate gang recruitment and asked how to stop prisons from being used to cultivate gang membership and violence.
  • Asked about the role of sentencing.
  • Previously introduced PMB C-437, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Prisons and Reformatories Act, also known as McCann’s Law.
Photo: Tako Van Popta

Tako Van Popta

Langley—Aldergrove, British Columbia

  • Elected to Parliament in 2019.

Bloc Quebecois (BQ)

Photo: Kristina Michaud (Vice-Chair)

Kristina Michaud
(Vice-Chair)

Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia Quebec

  • Elected to Parliament in 2019
  • Previously served on SECU in the last Parliament as the BQ’s Public Safety critic.
  • Of interest to CSC: During a study on guns and gangs, Michaud raised questions with witnesses about incarceration.
  • Previously involved in a study on the issue of parole following a high-profile incident in Quebec.

New Democratic Party (NDP)

Photo: Alistair MacGregor (Vice-Chair)

Alistair MacGregor
(Vice-Chair)

Cowichan—Malahat—Langford British Columbia

  • Elected to Parliament in 2015
  • Of interest to CSC: NDP MP Alistair MacGregor (his party's public safety critic, noted that his predecessor, Jack Harris, was calling for this type of structured release early in the pandemic…and that he wasn't going to close the door on this option. "I don't think it's something that should be employed just yet. It's definitely something that should be in their back pocket if the situation gets dramatically worse, "MacGregor said. He specifically pointed to the high vaccination rates as a reason to change approach, though he did not specify what this might look like.”
  • At the meeting on February 8th, MacGregor questioned the ability of CSC to safely reintegrate inmates and asked for specific recommendations to delivero the agency.

8. Committee Logistics

Information on virtual parliamentary committee meetings

Name of organization (if appearing on behalf of an organization) or as an individual
Name of witness
Professional title
Email
Temporary email and password
City and Province
(location of witness on the day of the meeting)
Telephone number(s)
(in case of technical issues prior or during the meeting)
Contact name and coordinates
(technician or administrative staff, if applicable)
Language spoken by witness
Audio feed to witness

Page details

Date modified: