Appearance before the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU), Supplementary Estimates C, March 24, 2026

List of Acronyms
AB
Alberta
BC
British Columbia
BQ
Bloc Québécois
CCRA
Corrections and Conditional Release Act
CD
Commissioner’s Directive
CEGEP
Collège d'enseignement général et professionnel
CER
Comprehensive Expenditure Review
CHRA
Canadian Human Rights Act
CORCAN
CSC offender employment/training program
COVID-19
Coronavirus Disease 2019
CPC
Conservative Party of Canada
CRF
Community Reintegration Fund
CSC
Correctional Service of Canada
CSCO
Connecting Spirits, Creating Opportunities
DCIC
Deputy Commissioner for Indigenous Corrections
EPP
Employee Protection Protocol
EXCOM
Executive Committee
HCV
Hepatitis C Virus
HIV
Human Immunodeficiency Virus
IEDM / IEDMs
Independent External Decision Maker(s)
IOR-CP
Indigenous Offender Reintegration Contribution Program
ISH
Indigenous Social History
LPC
Liberal Party of Canada
MP
Member of Parliament
NIHB
Non-Insured Health Benefits
OAT
Opioid Agonist Treatment
ON
Ontario
OPS
Overdose Prevention Site / Service
PBC
Parole Board of Canada
PMB
Private Member’s Bill
PNEP
Prison Needle Exchange Program
QC
Québec
SCIS
Secure Certificate of Indian Status
SECU
Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
SIU / SIUs
Structured Intervention Unit(s)
SMART
Self-Management and Recovery Training
TRA
Threat Risk Assessment
UAL
Unlawfully At Large
UAS
Unmanned Aerial System
UTA
Unescorted Temporary Absence
U.S.
United States
W2B
Walls to Bridges

1. Financial Snapshot

Supplementary Estimates C

The 2025 to 2026 Supplementary Estimates (C) net total amount for the Correctional Service of Canada is $152.7M or 3.7% of authorities to date.

Voted Appropriations (New Spending Authorities)

The Correctional Service of Canada has received Treasury Board authority to increase its voted appropriations by $138.3M.

$138.3M in funding for operating requirements 2025 to 2026.

Statutory Appropriations

The Correctional Service of Canada Statutory funding related to the Employee Benefit Plan is $14.4M.

Funding for Operating Requirements 2025 to 2026

Main Estimates 2026 to 2027

Explanation of Significant Changes

The net increase of $138.0 million compared to Main Estimates 2025 to 2026 is primarily attributable to additional funding for:

These increases are partially offset by decreases resulting from the following:

Main Estimates 2026 to 2027

Category

2023 to 2024

2024 to 2025

2025 to 2026

2026 to 2027

Operating

$2,972,216,466

$3,028,408,308

$3,663,695,968

$3,759,915,386

Capital

$197,572,246

$262,742,908

$337,357,217

$382,568,067

Transfer Payments

$1,020,000

$1,620,000

$1,700,000

$1,700,000

Revenues and other deductions

($117,752,744)

($121,495,150)

($140,223,700)

($143,609,268)

Total

$3,053,055,968

$3,171,276,066

$3,862,529,485

$4,000,574,185

Core responsibility: Care and Custody

Main Estimates

Main Estimates: Care and Custody

Category

2023 to 2024

2024 to 2025

2025 to 2026

2026 to 2027

Operating

$1,830,111,900

$1,796,404,511

$2,331,312,634

$2,467,844,314

Capital

$167,200,343

$220,462,070

$268,264,976

$321,614,857

Transfer Payments

$120,000

$620,000

$200,000

$200,000

Revenues and other deductions

$0

$0

$0

$0

Total

$1,997,432,243

$2,017,486,581

$2,599,777,610

$2,789,659,171

Core responsibility: Correctional Interventions

Main Estimates

Main Estimates: Correctional Interventions

Category

2023 to 2024

2024 to 2025

2025 to 2026

2026 to 2027

Operating

$588,857,076

$616,615,852

$665,165,624

$682,567,267

Capital

$1,006,087

$17,344,717

$39,404,692

$26,743,788

Transfer Payments

$900,000

$500,000

$642,857

$642,857

Revenues and other deductions

($113,809,344)

($117,551,750)

($136,280,300)

($139,665,868)

Total

$476,953,819

$516,908,819

$568,932,873

$570,288,044

Core responsibility: Community Supervision

Main Estimates

Main Estimates: Community Supervision

Category

2023 to 2024

2024 to 2025

2025 to 2026

2026 to 2027

Operating

$171,746,424

$186,446,592

$227,688,004

$227,549,207

Capital

$5,832,622

$832,825

$1,451,726

$1,670,000

Transfer Payments

$0

$500,000

$857,143

$857,143

Revenues and other deductions

$0

$0

$0

$0

Total

$177,579,046

$187,779,417

$229,996,873

$230,076,350

Core responsibility: Internal Services

Main Estimates

Main Estimates: Internal Services

Category

2023 to 2024

2024 to 2025

2025 to 2026

2026 to 2027

Operating

$381,501,066

$428,941,353

$439,529,706

$381,954,598

Capital

$23,533,194

$24,103,296

$28,235,823

$32,539,422

Transfer Payments

$0

$0

$0

$0

Revenues and other deductions

($3,943,400)

($3,943,400)

($3,943,400)

($3,943,400)

Total

$401,090,860

$449,101,249

$463,822,129

$410,550,620

2. Hot Issues Notes

2.1 Escapes

If Pressed - Minimum Security

If Pressed - Custer

Issue

The security measures in place at any institution reflect the degree of control required to maintain the good order of the institution and to protect staff, inmates and the public.

CSC takes the possibility of escapes seriously. There are a number of operational practices in place to prevent escapes, including the designation of restricted air space in areas where federal institutions are located. CSC also regularly explores innovative security tools to enhance its capacity to limit and prevent escapes. The exact measures and design features in use at a specific site cannot be disclosed for safety and security reasons.

Inmates who escaped federal institutions represent about 0.1% of the total inmate population. While the number of escapes fluctuates from year to year, efforts to promote active security, encourage positive interactions between employees and inmates, enhance risk evaluation quality and ensure effective case management practices have had a positive impact in reducing the number of escapes.

Procedures Following the Capture of an Inmate

Following the capture of an inmate who has escaped or who was unlawfully at large (UAL), the inmate will be detained at an institution at the appropriate security level in the region of the arrest. The region in which the inmate is recaptured/returned is responsible for determining the placement and security level. Readmission procedures may differ by region.

Offenders who escape can be criminally charged under Section 145 of the Criminal Code. Additionally, under the CCRA, offenders can be institutionally charged for actions taken for the purpose of escaping or in assisting another offender to escape. In addition to potential disciplinary charges, CSC will consider security reclassification for the offender.

Number of Escapes

Fiscal Year

2012 to 2013

2013 to 2014

2014 to 2015

2015 to 2016

2016 to 2017

2017 to 2018

2018 to 2019

2019 to 2020

2020 to 2021

2021 to 2022

2022 to 2023

2023 to 2024

2024 to 2025

Total Offenders

24

13

15

18

11

17

16

12

11

5

11

10

19

2.2 Comprehensive Expenditure Review

If Pressed – Mobile Patrol

If Pressed - Libraries

If Pressed - Postsecondary Education

If Pressed - CEGEP

If Pressed - Workforce Adjustment

2.3 Unescorted Temporary Absences - Offender Ray

2.4 Contraband and Drone Detection

If Pressed - Jamming

Responses to Contraband and Drones

2.5 Parliamentary Visits

Legislation and Considerations

Under section 72 of the CCRA every member of the House of Commons, every Senator and every judge of a court of Canada has the right to:

Pursuant to the CCRA and its regulations, visits by Parliamentarians and judges must be authorized unless there are reasonable grounds to believe that the visit would jeopardize the security of the penitentiary or the safety of any person and restrictions would not be adequate to control the risk. Only an institutional head can refuse or suspend a visit.

CSC has experienced an increase in the number of Parliamentarian visits to our institutions and parole offices. CSC hosted 43 Parliamentary visits in 2024 to 2025 and has hosted 40 visits in the 2025 to 2026 fiscal year as of February 27th. This represents and increase from 22 visits in 2023 to 2024.

The best practice for these visits to have the warden (or a delegate) present during the tour. Not only are wardens responsible for the safety of the institution and the safety of employees, inmates and visitors, they are familiar with the layout and routine of the institution and can answer a range of questions.

2.6 Conditional Release

Statistics

Of 7,199 offenders who were on Day Parole or Full Parole for at least one day during the fiscal year, 0.3% were convicted with a violent offence committed while under supervision, and 1.0% were convicted with a non-violent offence committed while under supervision.

Between fiscal years 2020 to 2021 to 2024 to 2025:

After a consistent yearly decrease in the in-custody population between 2013 to 2014 and 2021 to 2022, the in-custody population increased 5.9% from 12,328 in 2021 to 2022 to 13,054 in 2022 to 2023.

Despite this increase, the in-custody population has not returned to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels. Over the past 10 years (from 2013 to 2014 to 2022 to 2023), the total offender population supervised in the community increased by 5.3%.

2.7 Security Classification and Transfers

Security Classification

Inmate Transfers

If Pressed - Transfer of Millard

Security Classification

All inmates entering federal custody undergo a full assessment and referral process to identify their program and security needs, which may include health considerations, correctional programs, as well as employment and education assessments.

Initial security classification and subsequent security reclassification includes the use of evidence-based assessment instruments along with the professional judgment of specialized staff and psychological assessments, if applicable.

The following factors are considered in assigning a security classification to each inmate:

This process considers the degree and type of custody and control required to ensure the safety of staff, the public, and institutions. The inmate's accessibility to family and other support mechanisms, the availability of appropriate programs and services, such as cultural initiatives, and the inmate's willingness to participate in those programs, are also considered.

As per policy, CSC must review the security classification of medium and maximum-security inmates at least every two years. Classification reviews must also be undertaken following a significant event (i.e., serious incident; escape, etc.). The inmate security classification process also takes into consideration Indigenous Social History (ISH) for Indigenous inmates.

Transfers

Transfers of inmates from one institution to another may occur for many reasons, including when an inmate's security classification is reviewed. All transfers of inmates to lower levels of security occur only after CSC has duly considered such aspects as public safety, required degree of control and supervision in the penitentiary and the risk of escape.

As inmates progress through the correctional system to lower security levels and earn more freedom of movement within the institution, the programs and activities are tailored to more closely reflect the conditions the inmate is likely to encounter once released into the community. A transfer to minimum security allows the inmate to experience greater autonomy to prepare for a safe reintegration into the community.

2.8 Victim Services and Victim Notification

Bill S-12

Background

The CCRA recognizes that victims of crime have an important role to play in the criminal justice system. It provides victims with an opportunity to receive information about the offender that harmed them and participate in the federal corrections and conditional release process. Under the CCRA, victims who meet the definition are entitled to receive, upon request, offender-specific information otherwise not available to the public, including the offender’s name, the offence(s) of which the offender was convicted, the court that convicted the offender, the start date and length of the sentence the offender is serving and the offender’s eligibility dates and review dates for temporary absences or parole.

Further discretionary information, such as the name and location of the correctional institution where the offender is being held, may be disclosed to a victim when the Commissioner of CSC determines that the victim’s interest in receiving the information outweighs the potential invasion of the offender’s privacy. Victims may also ask to receive ongoing notifications of changes, such as when federal offenders are transferred to other federal or provincial facilities, including advance notification of a transfer to a minimum-security institution or to a healing lodge.

CSC can also provide registered victims with information about the offender’s progress in meeting the objectives in their Correctional Plan at specific points of their sentence. With consideration to public safety, CSC also provides victims with certain types of information at the time of certain releases, such as the offender’s release date, destination (and whether the offender will be in the vicinity of the victims while travelling to that destination), any conditions of release and a current photograph of the offender. This type of information allows victims to make informed decisions about their safety, which upholds their right to protection.

CSC encourages victims to provide a victim statement related to the continued impact that the crime, incarceration and release of the offenders have had on their lives. These statements can include relevant information about the offender, along with any safety concerns the victim may have and requests for conditions. This is the principal way that victims exercise their right to participation within the corrections and conditional release process. Victims are able to update these statements at any time, and offender case management teams are required by policy to review and consider any statement on file. As a matter of procedural fairness, CSC explains to victims that their statements are shared with the offender.

To receive information about the federal offender who harmed them, victims are asked to register with either CSC or the Parole Board of Canada (PBC). The registration process allows CSC to confirm that the applicant meets the definition of a victim before sharing protected information with victims about the offender. CSC provides information to victims based on their preferences. Information can be provided by telephone, mail and/or electronically through our secure, online Victims Portal, available 24/7.

2.9 Mother-Child Program

If Pressed - Edmonton Institution for Women

Background

The Institutional Mother-Child Program was piloted in 1996 and implemented at all women's sites in 2001. The program aims to strengthen the bond between mothers and their children by keeping them together where appropriate and providing a supportive environment that fosters stability and continuity to their relationship. This program is currently available in all women's institutions including the healing lodge.

The on-site component of the Mother-Child Program enables children to stay with their mothers on a part-time or full-time basis. As of February 26, 2026, there are 8 children participating in the program with 3 in the institutions on a full-time basis, and 5 participating on a part-time basis.

The best interest of the child is the primary consideration in all decisions related to participation in this program. This is includes considering the physical, emotional and spiritual well-being of the child, and the safety and security of the institution, in all activities.

Since its implementation, over 200 children have participated in the onsite full-time or part-time component of the Mother-Child Program

Off-site and other bonding services have expanded in recent years, accessible to all women offenders. These include in-person and video visits, counselling, education, legal and mediation supports, reading programs, escorted temporary absences to attend child-centred activities, and pre- and post-natal services.

A new tracking tool was implemented in April 2025 to monitor participation in all types of bonding services.

Safety of Children in the Program

There are rigorous eligibility criteria protocols in place for participation in this program, including child welfare screening completed by provincial and territorial child and family services, as well as ensuring that those residing in the Mother-Child Living Unit have not been convicted of an offence against a child. Mothers classified as maximum security are not eligible for full or part-time participation with their children but may access other bonding services.

2.10 Gender-Diverse Offenders

Statistics

At the end of fiscal year 2024 to 2025, gender diverse individuals represented less than 1% (0.83%) of CSC’s total offender population.

From 2017 to 2018 to 2024 to 2025, CSC received 129 requests from individuals assigned male at birth seeking placement or transfer in a women’s institution. Of these:

As of October 2025, there were 90 transgender women incarcerated in CSC institutions: 73 were housed in men’s institutions (81%) and 17 in women’s institutions (19%).

Current Status

In May 2022, CSC issued Commissioner’s Directive (CD) 100: Gender Diverse Offenders. This directive provides overarching policy direction aligned with amendments to Section 2 of the CHRA and paragraph 4(g) of the CCRA.

This policy supports staff in meeting the needs of gender diverse individuals and reinforces CSC’s legal duty to accommodate, regardless of a person’s sex (i.e., anatomy) or the gender marker on their identification.

2.11 Harm Reduction

Prison Needle Exchange Program

Overdose Prevention Sites

Background

Lifetime prevalence of problematic alcohol and substance use at the time of admission to federal institutions is assessed as 66% (men) and 61.6% (women) and higher for Indigenous men (85.2%) and women (85.7%). CSC research findings also show that roughly half (49.6%) of the incoming male offender population at time of assessment reported a current substance use problem, and the majority (55.5%) have a concurrent mental health disorder.

Approximately 20 to 22% of men and 27 to 29% of women report a lifetime history of injection drug use.

Past research found that those who inject drugs were 10 times more likely to acquire Hepatitis C (HCV) in custody. 47% of all new HCV infections were associated with injection drug use. 

Substance Use Services in CSC

CSC’s approach to substance use is shifting from a primarily stabilization‑ and risk‑reduction‑focused model to a more comprehensive, health‑centred approach that strengthens prevention, harm reduction, treatment, and continuing‑care services. This includes improving early screening, expanding harm‑reduction supports to address a broader range of substances, increasing access to addictions counselling and dedicated treatment programming, and enhancing release planning and community partnerships to support sustained recovery and reduce overdoses, relapse, and reoffending.

For individuals who are not ready to stop using substances, harm reduction remains an important element of care. CSC’s harm reduction measures include Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT), Prison Needle Exchange Program (PNEP), Overdose Prevention Service (OPS), Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART), and other peer support and harm reduction services (e.g. naloxone nasal spray, fentanyl testing strip, etc.). These measures are consistent with the federal Government’s Canadian Drugs and Substances Strategy and recommendations by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, which view substance use as a health issue.

To ensure the safety and security of staff, inmates and the institution, a Threat Risk Assessment (TRA) is conducted to review all PNEP applications. TRAs evaluate factors that could pose a danger to the management of an inmate, the safety of others and the security of an operational unit. This is the same model that is used for the distribution of EpiPens® and insulin needles. Appropriate safeguards have been established in every institution to ensure that PNEP kits are safely stored and accounted for at all times.

As of February 2026, the PNEP has been implemented at 13 institutions across the country. As of February 2026, OPS is available at 5 institutions: Drumheller Institution, Springhill Institution, Collins Bay Institution, Drummond Institution and Warkworth Institution.

Consistent with these efforts, CSC is also modernizing its formulary to ensure safer, evidence‑based prescribing and to reduce the misuse and diversion of high‑risk medications. Effective October 1, 2025, CSC adopted long‑acting injectable buprenorphine (Sublocade) as the first‑line treatment for opioid use disorder, designated methadone as a second‑line open benefit, and transitioned daily buprenorphine‑naloxone (Suboxone) to non‑formulary status following a six‑month phase‑out period. These evidence‑driven changes strengthen the quality and consistency of opioid agonist treatment across institutions, and planned formulary updates in 2026 will apply the same approach to other medications with diversion or misuse potential.

2.12 Staff Safety

If pressed – Community Staff Safety

Staff Assaults

Staff assaults are taken very seriously. Police may be called for any criminal offences and both criminal and internal disciplinary charges can be laid against inmates. CSC acts promptly to ensure measures are in place to protect staff and ensure ongoing support. 

At the end of fiscal year 2024 to 2025, there were 506 incidents of assault on staff reported over the course of the fiscal year, compared to 614 at the end of the previous fiscal year.

CSC has a comprehensive Employee Protection Protocol (EPP) in place to address incidents where an employee and/or their family may be at greater risk than the normal conditions of work. These guidelines apply to all individuals employed by CSC (indeterminate, term and casual, as well as those on secondment to CSC or working part-time) at all times regardless of location (i.e. not only at institutions but also in parole and administrative offices, residences, public spaces, etc.).

2.13 Structured Intervention Units

Progress

Background

Bill C-83 received Royal Assent on June 21, 2019, and came into force on November 30, 2019. Part of this Bill sought to eliminate administrative segregation and create SIUs with independent external oversight.

As of March 31st, 2025, there have been approximately 8844 “condition of confinement” referrals made to Independent External Decision Makers (IEDMs) for review. Of those reviewed (5284), the IEDM concluded 81% of the time that CSC had taken all reasonable steps to provide inmates with the opportunity for four hours out of their cell, with two hours of interaction with others. In the remaining decisions, the IEDMs have made recommendations to CSC or required the inmate to be removed from an SIU.

Results

At the end of fiscal year 2024 to 2025:

2.14 Overrepresentation of Indigenous Offenders within the Correctional Service of Canada

Progress

Section 81
Section 84
Elders and Spiritual Advisors

Background

While decisions with respect to sentencing are outside of CSC’s control, CSC does influence the time Indigenous offenders spend in custody by providing culturally responsive programs and interventions to address an Indigenous offender’s risk, provide effective rehabilitation and foster successful community reintegration. CSC is committed to making impactful changes and to improve reintegration outcomes for Indigenous offenders in a meaningful way. Notably, there was an increase in the percentage of discretionary releases for Indigenous offenders, from 35.8% in fiscal year 2021 to 2022 to 42.4% in fiscal year 2024 to 2025 CSC has introduced many initiatives to address systemic factors that have contributed to the overrepresentation of Indigenous peoples, including:

Institutional and Structural Changes
Reintegration and Community Support
Culturally Responsive Programming
Healing Lodges and Section 81 Facilities
Staff Training and Support

2.15 Employment Standards

Background

While the National Standards for the Deployment of Correctional Officers are met, staffing requirements can vary depending on many factors, such as time of year, absenteeism and operational requirements, which can result in variances that require daily adjustments. In some cases, these situations result in the use of overtime to maintain safety and continuity of operations. CSC continues to work with labour partners to explore solutions, strengthen cooperation and facilitate the return to work of able employees, including through reintegration plans.

3. Committee Biographies

Liberal

Conservative

Bloc Quebecois

 

Liberal Party of Canada (LPC)

Portrait photograph of Hon. Jean-Yves Duclos.

Hon. Jean-Yves Duclos
(Committee Chair)
Québec Centre, QC

Elected to Parliament in 2015

Recent interventions of interest to CSC: N/A

Recent CSC visits: N/A

 

 

 

 

Portrait photograph of Sima Acan

Sima Acan
Oakville West, ON

Elected to Parliament in 2025

Recent interventions of interest to CSC: N/A

Recent CSC visits: N/A

Portrait photograph of Marcus Powlowski

Marcus Powlowski
Thunder Bay - Rainy River, ON

Elected to Parliament in 2025

Recent interventions of interest to CSC: N/A

Recent CSC visits: N/A

Portrait photograph of Hon. Ali Ehsassi

Hon. Ali Ehsassi
Willowdale, ON 

Elected to Parliament in 2015

Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs and One Canadian Economy (Canada-U.S. Trade) (Parliamentary Secretary

Recent interventions of interest to CSC: N/A

Recent CSC visits: N/A

Portrait photograph of Jacques Ramsay

Jacques Ramsay
La Prairie – Atateken, QC

Elected to Parliament in 2025

Recent interventions of interest to CSC:

  • Spoke in support of Bill C-48 and its efforts to tighten the rules against repeat offenders

Recent CSC visits: Visited Cowansville Institution in February 2026, while the CEGEP issue was receiving attention. 

Conservative Party of Canada (CPC)

Portrait photograph of Frank Caputo

Frank Caputo
(Vice-Chair)
Kamloops – Thompson –
Nicola, BC 

Background:

Elected to Parliament in 2021

Has recently raised questions pertaining to:

  • How CSC classifies and transfers inmates.
  • Public notification when offenders are released into the community.
  • The proximity of certain offenders to the Mother-Child Program.

Recent CSC visits: 3

  • Edmonton Institution
  • Fraser Valley Institution
  • Kwikwexwelp Healing Village

 

Portrait photograph of Chak Au

Chak Au
Richmond Centre – Marpole, BC

Elected to Parliament in 2025

Recent interventions of interest to CSC: N/A

Recent CSC visits: N/A

Portrait photograph of Dane Lloyd

Dane Lloyd
Parkland, AB

Elected to Parliament in 2017

Raised questions pertaining to:

  • How CSC classifies and transfers inmates.
  • The former Bill C-83’s wording of “least restrictive”.
  • Recently spoke out against the transfer of Dellen Millard during debate on his PMB Bill C-236 noting that the body of one of the victims has never been disclosed by the offender.

Recent CSC visits: 0

Portrait photograph of Rhonda Kirkland

Rhonda Kirkland
Oshawa, ON

Elected to Parliament in 2025

Recent interventions of interest to CSC:

  • Declared that violent offenders receive better treatment and programs than victims

Recent CSC visits: Visited Fraser Valley Institution on January 2, 2026. During that visit, the MP focused on how gender-diverse offenders are classified and transferred and the number of assaults committed by them.

Bloc Quebecois (BQ)

Portrait photograph of Claude DeBellefeuille

Claude DeBellefeuille
(Vice-Chair)
Beauharnois – Salaberry – Soulanges – Huntingdon, QC

Elected to Parliament in 2019

Recent interventions of interest to CSC: N/A

Recent CSC visits: Recently visited Port-Cartier in January 2026 and raised concerns about the lack of personnel working to keep the institution safe due to a difficult recruitment process. Also raised concerns about the delays in deploying body scanners and signal jammers.

4. Current Private Member’s Bills of Interest

Bill S-205, An Act to Amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act.

At the committee stage in the Senate.

This enactment amends the CCRA to require that if an inmate has disabling mental health issues, they be transferred to a hospital; that a court order is required for transfers to SIUs longer than 48 hours, to allow for the provision of correctional services and plans for release and reintegration into the community to persons from disadvantaged or minority populations by community groups and other similar support services; and allow for persons who are sentenced to a period of incarceration or parole ineligibility to apply to the court that imposed that sentence for a reduction if there has been unfairness in the administration of their sentence.

Bill C-221, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (disclosure of information to victims)

Has been referred to SECU

This enactment amends the CCRA to provide that information that is disclosed to the victim of an offence regarding eligibility dates and review dates applicable to the offender in respect of temporary absences, releases or parole must include an explanation of how the dates were determined.

Bill C-232 An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (maximum security offenders)

Was introduced at First Reading in the House of Commons.

This enactment amends the CCRA to require that inmates who have been found to be dangerous offenders or convicted of more than one first degree murder be assigned a security classification of maximum and confined in a maximum-security penitentiary or area in a penitentiary.

Bill C-235 An Act to amend the Criminal Code (increasing parole ineligibility)

Has been debated at Second Reading in the House of Commons.

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to provide that a person convicted of the abduction, sexual assault and murder of the same victim in respect of the same event or series of events is to be sentenced to imprisonment for life without eligibility for parole until the person has served a sentence of between twenty-five and forty years, as determined by the presiding judge after considering the recommendation, if any, of the jury.

Bill C-236 An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Prisons and Reformatories Act

Was introduced at First Reading in the House of Commons.

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to add as an aggravating factor for sentencing purposes and as a reason to delay parole the fact that a person who is convicted of certain offences refuses to provide persons in authority with information respecting the location of bodies or remains. It also amends the CCRA and the Prisons and Reformatories Act to add that fact as a consideration in the making of certain decisions under those Acts.

Bill C-240 An Act to amend the Criminal Code, to make related amendments to the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act

Was introduced at First Reading in the House of Commons.

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to provide that a court may, by order, in addition to any term of imprisonment imposed on an offender for the commission of an offence, prescribe measures that the offender is to take during the custodial period of their sentence, which may include participation in educational, training or treatment programs.
It also makes related amendments to the CCRA to, among other things, provide that objectives with regard to programs that the offender may be required to complete during the custodial period of their sentence are to be included in the correctional plan developed by the head of the facility in which the offender is held and to provide that the assessments that parole boards take into consideration when making a determination regarding the granting of parole are to include information on the progress made by an offender with regard to any prescribed measures that the offender was required to take.
Finally, the enactment amends the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to provide that a court imposing a sentence on a person convicted of trafficking in fentanyl must consider as an aggravating factor the fact that the person trafficked it in quantities that indicate trafficking on a large scale.

Bill C-243 An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (parole review)

Has been debated at Second Reading in the House of Commons.

This enactment amends the CCRA to provide that, in the case of an offender who is serving a sentence for first degree murder or second degree murder, parole is reviewed in accordance with the statutory time frames — not on application by the offender — once the Board has decided not to grant day or full parole to the offender or to cancel or terminate the offender’s parole.

Bill C-246 An Act to amend the Criminal Code (consecutive sentences for sexual offences)

Currently awaiting introduction at First Reading

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to require that sentences for sexual offences be served consecutively.

Page details

2026-07-13