Evaluation of the Military Transition Program

Alternate Formats

PDF Version
(1,678 KB, 56 pages)

Assistant Deputy Minister (Review Services)

ACVA: Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs
ADM(RS): Assistant Deputy Minister (Review Services)
B/W: Base/Wing
CA: Canadian Army
CAF: Canadian Armed Forces
CAF TC: Canadian Armed Forces Transition Centre
CAF TG: Canadian Armed Forces Transition Group
CAFRA: Canadian Armed Forces Release Administration
CAFTWS: Canadian Armed Forces Transition and Well-being Survey
Cdn: Canadian
CDA: Canadian Defence Academy
CDS: Chief of the Defence Staff
CFB: Canadian Forces Base
CFHS: Canadian Forces Health Services
CMP: Chief of Military Personnel
DAOD: Defence Administrative Orders and Directives
DGCB: Director General Compensation and Benefits
DGE: Director General Evaluation
DGMPRA: Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis
DND: Department of National Defence
DRF: Departmental Results Framework
ETT: Enhanced Transition Training
FOC: Final Operational Capability
FTE: Full-Time Employee
FY: Fiscal Year
GC: Government of Canada
HQ: Headquarters

HR: Human Resources
IOC: Initial Operational Capability
IPSC: Integrated Personnel Support Centre
IT/IM: Information Technology/Information Management
JPSU: Joint Personnel Support Unit
LASS: Life After Service Survey
MFRC: Military Family Resource Centre
MTP: Military Transition Program
NCM: Non-Commissioned Members
NCR: National Capital Region
OAG: Office of the Auditor General
ON: Ontario
PAA: Program Alignment Architecture
PIP: Performance Information Profile
PMEC: Performance Measurement and Evaluation Committee
PSO: Personnel Selection Officer
QC: Quebec
RCAF: Royal Canadian Air Force
RCN: Royal Canadian Navy
SCAN: Second Career Assistance Network
SISIP: Service Income Security and Insurance Plan
SSE: Canada’s defence policy: Strong, Secure, Engaged
TA: Transition Advisor
TB: Treasury Board
TBS: Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
VAC: Veterans Affairs Canada
VRPSM: Vocational Rehabilitation Program for Serving Members

Overall Assessment

The design of the new Military Transition Program addresses the known gaps and deficiencies experienced in the past in the CAF’s transition services.
The Program is, therefore, likely to be effective if appropriately resourced and implemented.
Unless performance measurement is improved, the Transition Group will not be able to demonstrate its long-term effectiveness.

This report presents the findings and recommendations of the Evaluation of the Military Transition Program (MTP). The evaluation was conducted by Assistant Deputy Minister (Review Services) (ADM(RS)) as a component of the Department of National Defence (DND) Five-Year Evaluation Plan, in accordance with the Treasury Board (TB) Policy on Results (2016). The evaluation adopted an ex-ante, or forward-looking, approach examining the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of the MTP for fiscal years (FY) 2013/14 to 2017/18 (referred to in the report as “historic transition services”), as well as the Canadian Armed Forces Transition Group (CAF TG) at its Final Operational Capability (FOC) (referred to as “the new Military Transition Program”).

Evaluation methods included document and literature review, financial and Human Resources (HR) data analysis, key informant interviews, a performance measurement working group and Second Career Assistance Network (SCAN) seminar feedback forms. This evaluation did not assess compliance with legislation, policies or regulations, or the adequacy of internal controls.

Program Description

Every year, on average since 2012, over 10,000 military members transition out of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF). The MTP aims to provide support for all CAF members as they prepare to leave the military to seamlessly transition to post-military life, which includes ensuring that all benefits to which the member is entitled are in place at the time of release. In collaboration with its partners, the new CAF TG, which stood up on December 10, 2018, is mandated to deliver personalized, professional and standardized transition services to CAF members and their families to enable seamless transition and enhanced well-being with special attention provided to ill and injured personnel, their families and the families of the deceased.

Relevance

Evaluation findings suggest that the CAF’s historic transition services generally meet the needs of transitioning members and their families. However, evidence indicates that there are gaps in available services and some deficiencies pertaining to communication. A lack of direct outreach to the spouses/families, and lack of integration of transition-related policies and procedures between CAF and Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC), are among the gaps identified through interviews and literature review. Evidence from interviews and literature review also shows that historical transition services have been inconsistent in their quality, availability, timeliness, frequency and accessibility depending on the member’s location.

There is evidence that the design of the new program will sufficiently address these gaps. The most important stakeholders have been involved in the design, and the new features of the program are tailored to address the gaps. The staged approach to the implementation of the new program improves its chances of success. There is also evidence that the new transition program has been responsive to previous recommendations made by oversight bodies.

There is a lack of performance information for historic transition services within the CAF. The performance measurement system for the MTP is currently being revised. Some performance measurement for historic transition services is taking place, but due to resource limitations the data from this activity is not being aggregated and stored systematically, and is therefore not being used for decision making.

Effectiveness

Although the experience of transitioning members from military to civilian life has been well researched, there is limited evidence of the extent to which CAF transition services have contributed to the long-term success of a member’s transition. Surveys confirm that the majority of CAF members who participate in CAF transition services believe that these services would contribute to a more successful transition. However, the actual success of transition could not be assessed as they were conducted prior to a member’s release and CAF members are not tracked after release. Adequate performance measurement could assist in identifying which aspects of the new program are working as intended as well as areas for improvement.

The design of the new MTP addresses the available evidence on what makes for a successful transition by recognizing the complex and personal nature of transition success. While historical transition services have been focused largely on the medically releasing with less attention to the rest of the CAF, the literature paints a more complex picture of who is most in need of support. The new program will adopt an evidence-based approach to recognize members’ needs, identifying those most in need of support and in which areas, and will therefore help guide the transition process for each individual towards the needed areas.

Efficiency

The evaluation was unsuccessful in assessing the anticipated cost effectiveness of the new MTP at FOC, and was unable to compare it to the historical program. It is not possible to assess the cost effectiveness of either the historic transition services or the new transition program as its design is still evolving, and resources, both personnel and financial, for the new program have yet to be confirmed. There is some evidence that the resourcing of historical transition services has been insufficient, but it is unclear whether or not the increased resources anticipated for the new program will be sufficient. Going forward, it will be important to capture the necessary financial information in order to conduct cost-efficiency analyses in the future.

Back to Table of Contents

Key Findings and Recommendations

Table 1. Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations. This table provides a consolidation of report findings and recommendations.
Key Finding	Recommendation
Relevance
1. The CAF’s historic transition services are perceived as relevant to transitioning members, however, gaps in available services and deficiencies in communicating services were identified.	1. Ensure CAF members and their families are kept abreast of any developments in new or existing transition services, with a specific emphasis on spouses and partners.
2. The new MTP’s design addresses existing challenges in meeting the needs of transitioning members and their families.	-
3. There is a lack of performance information for historic transition services.	2. Ensure the Performance Information Profile (PIP) for Military Transition adequately covers activities for historic transition services. Establish lines of reporting from bases/wings for performance information.
Effectiveness
4. The characteristics of a successful transition, and the factors that influence it, are well understood.	-
5. There is limited evidence of the extent to which CAF transition services have contributed towards the long-term success of members’ transition.	3. Working with the appropriate stakeholders, develop an approach for communicating with members post-release to enable reporting on longer-term transition outcomes.
6. The design of the new transition process, including its personalized approach and long-term planning, addresses the available evidence on transition success.	-
Efficiency
7. It is not possible to assess the cost effectiveness of the new Transition Program or of historical transition services, but there is evidence that this area has been under resourced in the past.	4. Once resources are confirmed for CAF TG, assess the adequacy of these resources to implement the full suite of transition services at all CAF Transition Centres (CAF TC) as per FOC design. 5. Ensure the full costs of delivering transition services are accurately captured and coded under the Departmental Results Framework (DRF) program 3.5, and regularly reviewed for the purposes of informing decision making.

Table 1 Details - Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations

Table 1 Summary:

This table represents the key findings and recommendations. There are two columns and ten rows including titles and labels throughout the table. The columns are labelled ‘Key Findings’ and ‘Recommendations’ and the rows list the finding and, if applicable, corresponding recommendation.

Key finding of relevance #1: The CAF’s historic transition services are perceived as relevant to transitioning members, however, gaps in available services and deficiencies in communicating services were identified. Associated recommendation: Ensure CAF members and their families are kept abreast of any developments in new or existing transition services, with a specific emphasis on spouses and partners.
Key finding of relevance #2: The new MTP’s design addresses existing challenges in meeting the needs of transitioning members and their families.
Key finding of relevance #3: There is a lack of performance information for historic transition services. Associated recommendation: Ensure the PIP for Military Transition adequately covers activities for historic transition services. Establish lines of reporting from bases for performance information.
Key finding of effectiveness #4: The characteristics of a successful transition, and the factors that influence it, are well understood.
Key finding of effectiveness #5: There is limited evidence of the extent to which CAF transition services have contributed towards the success of members’ transition. Associated recommendation: Working with the appropriate stakeholders, ensure the finalized PIP establishes measures for transition outcomes, with an appropriate method for communicating with members post-release.
Key finding of effectiveness #6: The design of the new transition process, including its personalized approach and long-term planning, addresses the available evidence on transition success.
Key finding of efficiency #7: It is not possible to assess the cost-effectiveness of the new Transition Program or of historical transition services. Associated recommendation: Ensure the full costs of delivering transition services are accurately captured and coded under program 3.5.

Back to Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Context for the Evaluation

The evaluation was conducted between April 2018 and March 2019, in accordance with the DND/CAF Departmental Evaluation Plan, approved in March 2018 by the Performance Measurement and Evaluation Committee (PMEC). The evaluation covers the MTP (Program 3.5 in DND/CAF’s Program Inventory). Its purpose, in part, was to assist with the development of the new program and to ensure its readiness for performance measurement and evaluation.

The CAF MTP is a new initiative announced as part of DND’s 2017 defence policy: Strong, Secure, Engaged (SSE). Through the stand-up of the new CAF TG, the program aims to provide support for all CAF members to seamlessly transition to post-military life, which includes ensuring that all benefits to which the member is entitled are in place at the time of release. More information on the MTP can be found in the following section.

CAF transition has been extensively examined in recent years. The following reviews were undertaken between FY 2013/14 and 2017/18 and examined the effectiveness of the CAF transition program and/or provided recommendations to DND/CAF in this area:

Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS) - Directed Review of Care for the Ill, Injured and Transitioning (2015).
DND Evaluation of the Governance of the Chief of Military Personnel (2016).
Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC) Evaluation of the Career Transition Program (2016).
Two VAC & DND Ombudsmen reviews (2016, 2017).
Three reports from the House of Commons Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (2016, 2017 and 2018).

Back to Table of Contents

1.2 Program Profile

1.2.1 Program Description

Over 10,000 members leave the CAF each year, including members of the Regular Force and of the Reserve, of which on average 1,667 are released for medical reasons.^{Footnote 1} Due to numerous interrelated factors, many CAF members have difficulty transitioning to civilian life. In order to support members through the complex transition process, DND and the CAF offer a variety of programs and services to support CAF members as they prepare to leave the military. Prior to December 2018, these programs and services were the responsibility of the Joint Personnel Support Unit (JPSU) within Military Personnel Command. Services were available to serving or former members who had been honourably released and were qualified in their occupation. Some of the offerings were restricted to members who were leaving for medical reasons.

Transition services offered to all CAF members (largely through the SCAN program) included:

transition and long-term planning seminars;
transition counselling;
career transition workshops;
interest inventory; and
a military to civilian job translator (Military Occupational Structure Identification Code/ National Occupation Code Equivalency Tool).

Support offered uniquely to medically releasing members included:

physical rehabilitation, mental health and peer support programs;
case management by a CAF nurse;
financial planning and financial counselling;
transition planning and referral services;
advocacy services to identify support and benefits entitlements; and
Vocational Rehabilitation Program for Serving Members (VRPSM).

In addition to these transition services, a number of other offerings are provided to veterans and their families by CAF and its partners, including pension and other benefits. Administration of these benefits is not part of the MTP, but rather is covered under Program 3.4: Defence Team Management.

Despite these offerings, CAF members continue to experience difficulties, as documented in numerous reviews by the DND Ombudsman, the Office of the Auditor General (OAG), and the House of Commons Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, among others. For reasons such as lack of availability or awareness of the afore-mentioned services, members have reported feeling inadequately prepared for transition, experiencing challenges navigating the bureaucracy, and enduring unnecessary wait times for benefits to kick in.

In recognition of this, the mandate letters of both the Minister of National Defence and the Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence directed the departments to work closely together to ensure a seamless transition for releasing CAF members.^{Footnote 2} In response, the Government’s new defence policy, SSE, 2017 introduced a renewed approach to transition that aims to ease the adjustment of releasing CAF members to civilian life by ensuring they receive the professional, standardized and personalized support they need. The SSE initiatives covered within the MTP are:

SSE initiative 27: aims to create a new CAF TG that provides support to all members to seamlessly transition to post-military life. The group will provide a fully engaged, personalized, guided support to transition all CAF members, with special care and attention being provided to those who are ill or injured, including those with psychological or critical stress injuries.
SSE initiative 28: ensures that all benefits will be in place before a member transitions to post-military life.

These initiatives work in tandem with SSE initiative 26 which will allocate some of the growth in the Medical Service Branch to support transition care (which is covered under Program 3.3: Total Health Care). Military transition is an essential component of the Journey initiative, which refers to the way the military recruit, train and treat members.

On December 7, 2018, the CDS and Deputy Minister jointly issued a Directive on Operation TRANSITION, announcing the standing up of the CAF TG. Once fully operational, the CAF TG will lead, integrate and synchronize all transition functions provided by the CAF. Thirty-two CAF TC will be established in bases across Canada, which may subsume other entities previously involved in transition, including the Integrated Personnel Support Centres (IPSC), Military Family Resource Centres (MFRC), and Base and Wing Personnel Selection Officers (B/W PSO). The majority of the services currently offered (previously listed) will continue, and will be complemented by new services and tools, including the following:

transition guide;
transition plan tailored to the needs of the individual member;
career-long education and training program beginning with mandated Enhanced Transition Training (ETT) which takes effect Apr 1, 2019;
centralized online transition access portal;
release process tracking tool to ensure key benefits are in place at time of release;
My Transition Application; and
Veterans Service Card.

“This seamless transition begins early in one's military career with a registration for a My VAC Account within the first year after enrolment. Preparation to transition of CAF members will be part of a professional development throughout their career. Navigation assistance will be provided throughout to aid transitioning personnel. Successful re-establishment will be achieved through a single harmonized CAF/VAC employment strategy to help enable the aspirations of CAF members in transition. A thoroughly integrated Information Technology/Information Management (IT/IM) system will provide seamless interoperability between DND/CAF and VAC and all other stakeholders…. Ultimately, the outcome is that the CAF member will have a successful transition to civilian life and for those requiring VAC services, these will be in place prior to release resulting in a single decision, communicated through a single comprehensive document, with benefits paid in a consistent and timely manner.”

CAF/VAC Transition Implementation Directive: CAF/VAC Transition Process Renewal - The New Transition Model. July 27, 2016.

**Figure 1. Military to Civilian Transition Process.** This figure displays the centralized system to the new Transition approach.

Figure 1 Details - Military to Civilian Transition Process

Figure 1 Summary:

This figure displays the centralized system to the new Transition approach which will be a revised five-step process. It will be personalized to the individual member. The process will involve integration between CAF and VAC, and will occur over the entire career of the CAF member, continuing on after transition.

The figure displays the steps the Transition Group will follow for a CAF Member in active service to a Veteran’s desired end state.

Step 1 will be understanding the transition. The Military Civilian Transition (MCT) option, ill & injured, voluntary releases/retirement and registration to MyVac Account.
Step 2 will involve planning for transition. Undergoing an assessment (transition interview screening process), SCAN seminars, a self-directed/guided support transition plan.
Step 3 will involve transition training. The will include integrated transition services, a well-being assessment self-screening tool, SISIP financial counselling, career transition services, Voc rehab. and a CAF nurse case manager complexity assessment.
Step 4 will involve undergoing a personalized transition experience. Part of this step will include a 30-day pre-release check-in, a referral to IPSC, SISIP, and VAC, as well as a release and handoff to VAC, self-service tools/case management/guided support. There will be one application for both the transition and benefits (all benefits will be in place at the time of release).
Step 5 will conclude with a successful reintegration into civilian life. This will involve positive post-transition in all domains of well-being, long-life access to VAC programs and services, follow up cycles, and integrated case management.

The personalized transition process will include a transition advisor (TA) who will become the member and their family’s personal point of contact. A Transition Interview/Conditions check will be conducted where the TA will assess the member’s transition readiness, based on recognized domains of well-being, which will support the formulation of the transition plan, the resultant transition timeline and refer the member and their family to the applicable service partners for resources, benefits and services. The process will ensure that the members and their family are ready to transition. The final step is attending a transition meeting and ensuring that all CAF/VAC administration is complete and will conclude with a positive handoff to VAC if applicable. Anytime throughout or after transition, members will have the option to reach back to the CAF TG for assistance if required.

A Performance Measurement Working Group, chaired by Director General Evaluation (DGE) and undertaken as part of this evaluation, has been tasked with supporting the development of the PIP. Because the evaluation is an ex-ante, or forward-looking, evaluation, the working group was included as a component of the evaluation to help ensure the program design is set up for performance measurement and future evaluations. A draft version of the logic model for the MTP, created by this working group, is included in Annex C.

1.2.2 Program Resources

Military Transition is a new program as of April 2018 and, therefore, historical expenditure data is not available.^{Footnote 3} Table 2 shows expenditures for the Transition and Release Program (former PAA Program 4.1.4), the program that encompassed services and support to transitioning CAF members.^{Footnote 4} According to the new defence policy (SSE), expenditures for the new MTP are to increase substantially over the next seven fiscal years. As seen in Table 2, expenditures already increased in 2017/18 due to the first year of SSE implementation. Planned expenditures for the next three fiscal years are shown in Table 3.^{Footnote 5} However, the exact level of planned expenditures for the program at FOC is still to be determined.

Table 2. Expenditures for PAA 4.1.4.This table shows expenditures for the Transition and Release program from 2014/15 to 2017/18.
-	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	2017/18
Expenditures	$11,341,788	$8,892,790	$8,760,634	$35,300,584

Table 2 Details - Transition and Release Program expenditures, dollar value of total program expenditures, FY 2014/2015 to 2017/2018

Table 3. Planned Spending for Military Transition Program. This table shows the planned spending for the Military Transition Program from 2018/19 to 2020/21.
-	2018/19	2019/20	2020/21
Planned spending ($000s)	$167,598	$168,794	$169,931

Table 3 Details - Planned Spending for Military Transition Program, 2018/19 to 2020/21

The design of the MTP is ongoing at the time of evaluation, therefore, Full-Time Employee (FTE) levels at FOC are not known at this time. SSE commits to a group that will be “1,200 personnel strong and include specialized staff and holding positions for ill and injured who are preparing to return to duty or transition out of the Canadian Armed Forces.”^{Footnote 6} According to CAF TG, achieving this required growth will be imperative to deliver on the necessary transition changes required and previously outlined.

1.2.3 Stakeholders

Transition services in the CAF are led by the CAF TG, which also provides support to ill and injured military personnel. Although policy establishing authority for military transition is out of date, CAF TG is the de facto functional authority for transition services for all CAF members.^{Footnote 7} Currently, CAF TG consists of 505 personnel, with close to 1,500 ill and injured members on its holding list.^{Footnote 8}

Historically, JPSU delivered transition services and support to all ill and injured members, including those on its Service Personnel Holding List, while B/W PSOs were responsible for delivering the majority of transition services to all other CAF members.

Other stakeholders involved in military transition include:

Within Chief of Military Personnel (CMP):
- Director General Compensation and Benefits (DGCB): responsible for CAF benefits and release administration;
- Director Military Careers Administration: posting and release authority;
- Canadian Forces Health Services Group: responsible for some medical aspects of transition, including case management by a CAF nurse;
- Personnel Selection Officers: responsible for informing members about retention options and supporting members to better prepare for life after service;
Canadian Forces Morale and Welfare Services/Service Income Security and Insurance Plan (SISIP)/Manulife: provide services for transitioning members/veterans and their families;
Base/Wing Administration Officer: responsible for delivering administrative services to members and their families at Bases/Wings across Canada;
Unit chain of command: responsible to continue to care for and support their members undergoing release/transition services; and
VAC: provide support and benefits to transitioning CAF members and veterans.

Back to Table of Contents

1.3 Evaluation Coverage

1.3.1 Evaluation Scope

The evaluation covers the MTP – Program 3.5 in the DND/CAF Program Inventory. As the MTP is still in the planning stages in FY 2018/19, the evaluation adopted an ex-ante, or forward-looking, approach. Consistent with the TB Policy on Results (2016), the evaluation examined the historical relevance and effectiveness of past CAF transition services, and the anticipated relevance, effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the new MTP. It also supported the design of performance measurement for both the historical program and the new program. This will ensure the future evaluability of the new program once implemented. As a program evaluation, this study did not assess compliance with legislation, policies or regulations, nor did it assess the adequacy of internal controls.

The evaluation focused on transition for Regular Force members (i.e., excluded Reserve members), and covered only the transition services portion of the MTP, excluding care of the ill and injured. It also excluded areas outside of the MTP that are related to it, such as benefits and health care for transitioning members and veterans.

The evaluation covered two time periods: a historical examination of CAF transition services during the previous five fiscal years (FY 2013/14 to FY 2017/18) as well as the new CAF TG at its FOC. The report refers to the former time period as “historic transition services” and the latter as “the new Military Transition Program.” The evaluation excluded the early implementation of the new transition program, including the transition trial at Canadian Forces Base (CFB) Borden, which is underway at the time of the writing of this report.

1.3.2 Issues and Questions

An evaluation matrix listing each of the evaluation questions, with associated indicators and data sources, is provided in Annex D. The methodology used to gather evidence in support of the evaluation questions can be found in Annex B.

Back to Table of Contents

2.0 Findings and Recommendations

2.1 Relevance and Program Design

Evaluation findings suggest that the CAF’s historic transition services generally meet the needs of transitioning members and their families. Evidence from the document and literature reviews, as well as key informant interviews demonstrated that the transition services currently offered to CAF members are numerous and that the CAF provides extensive support to its transitioning members. Overall, key informants reported that CAF members who make use of transition services receive a sufficient level of assistance to meet their needs.

Most transitioning members believe that the CAF services meet their needs, as evidenced in part by their satisfaction with them. For example, a 2017 survey found that three quarters (75.7 percent) of all CAF members who had used the CAF transition services were satisfied with them.^{Footnote 9} Less than a tenth (8.6 percent) reported being dissatisfied. Similarly, three quarters of Regular Force respondents (76.1 percent) were satisfied with the relevance of transition program information provided to them.^{Footnote 10} According to feedback forms from SCAN seminars in October - November 2018 that were analyzed as part of this evaluation, the overwhelming majority (95 percent) of participants agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the seminar,^{Footnote 11} and nine in ten (89.5 percent) agreed that the seminar was very relevant to their circumstances.

Despite the perceived satisfaction previously noted, evidence from the literature review and interviews indicates that gaps in available services exist, and that there are some deficiencies in communicating the available transition services; for example:

Insufficient information provided to spouses/families;
Gaps in integration from CAF to VAC;
Inconsistent quality of and access to services; and
Limited and inconsistent communication about transition services.

Insufficient information provided to spouses/families

Historically, the involvement of CAF members’ families has been relatively low. Nearly half (47 percent) of all key informants interviewed for this evaluation, both at the Headquarters (HQ) and the B/W levels, reported that the proportion of members’ families who are involved in the transition process and access transition services remains relatively low, and family events are poorly attended.^{Footnote 12} Studies have shown that families often do not receive sufficient information during the transition process.^{Footnote 13} Several interviewees noted that, unless members actively engage their spouses/families, it is unknown how much information the spouses/families are receiving regarding available transition services. Evidence from both the literature review and interviews suggests that a releasing member’s family participation is dependent on the member’s choice to involve them. However, a few B/W interviewees noted that members often do not invite spouses/families to attend information sessions. The lack of a mechanism to make information available to spouses/families means that information on the various transition programs and services is not readily available to them, resulting in the low awareness of transition services among the spouses/families.

The limited information available to the spouses/families is viewed as a major gap, given that families provide a significant amount of support to members, both during their careers with the CAF and especially during the period of transition to post-military life. This is particularly true in cases with ill and injured CAF members and members dealing with mental health issues; although some programs such as the joint CAF/VAC Operational Stress Injury Social Support Program do provide a mechanism of support to both members and their families. Spouses, adult children and parents frequently assume a significant role in caring for ill and injured military personnel and veterans. In addition to providing emotional support, they often assist with members’ physical care, therapy, coordinating formal health care services, helping navigate health insurance and legal systems, etc.^{Footnote 14} However, caregiving can pose significant challenges for members’ spouses/families. A 2015 study found that almost half of all caregivers report needing to adjust their work schedules as a result of caregiving, and more than half suffered some financial strain.^{Footnote 15} A few B/W interviewees noted that spouses assisting the members at home with activities of daily living are often too fatigued or unable to work outside of the home. For spouses/families of members dealing with mental health issues during their transition to civilian life, the adaptation can be especially difficult, as spouses/families are often “the first line” in members’ support network.^{Footnote 16}

While spouses/families play a key role in members’ transition success, they receive little direct support during the transition process. The literature review indicated that there is a considerable gap in the services offered to transitioning members’ families. Many government programs are still in their infancy and community resources are scattered and un-coordinated. Furthermore, there are additional difficulties in accessing services due to eligibility criteria.^{Footnote 17} For example, a 2016 study found that one of the most common problems experienced by families of veterans is the difficulty in obtaining services directly in their own right when the veteran is dealing with mental health issues, as the VAC’s internal policies prevent departmental employees from providing services to anyone but the veteran.^{Footnote 18} A 2015 study on the needs of medically releasing CAF personnel and their families found high levels of distress about service availability and access among caregivers.^{Footnote 19} Half of B/W interviewees stated that there needs to be a larger focus on providing information on available services and support to spouses/families/children of transitioning CAF members. While the new Transition Program has been designed to seek further involvement of members’ families, the interviewees highlighted a need to establish a more direct and accessible mechanism to ensure families/spouses are provided with the information about available services and receive the support they need.

ADM(RS) Recommendation

Need for improved integration between CAF and VAC

Multiple previous studies found that, historically, there has been a lack of integration of transition-related policies, procedures and associated paperwork between DND/CAF and VAC.^{Footnote 20} Both DND/CAF and VAC recognized the challenges and have been working on solutions. Thus, a DND/VAC Joint Steering Committee was established to help manage the transition, reintegration and continuity of support to members and veterans. However, the governance framework did not specify the authority, responsibility, and accountability of the Committee, and measurable objectives and specific timelines were not established for all joint priorities approved by the Committee.^{Footnote 21} Therefore, despite increased efforts to better coordinate between the two departments, the transition from CAF to VAC remains challenging for many CAF members, although it should be noted that improvements have been made in this area in the past year.

The gap in coordination has resulted in the transition process being complex, lengthy and difficult to navigate for CAF members and veterans, as well as departmental staff responsible for assessing eligibility and managing the delivery of services.^{Footnote 22} Challenges remain in accessing services and benefits due to the complexity of eligibility criteria, lack of clear information on support available, the amount of paperwork involved and case management services that require further improvement.^{Footnote 23} Additionally, both departments experience difficulties in communicating and meeting service delivery standards and requirements, particularly those related to assessments and case management services. Evidence from the literature review and key informant interviews suggests that this often leads to members and veterans not receiving the services and benefits they are entitled to or not receiving them in a timely manner. Several key informants in the HQ noted that insufficient collaboration between CAF and VAC often leads to challenges in accessing VAC benefits.

Challenges in client transition from the CAF to VAC are, in part, the result of Canadian Forces Health Services (CFHS) and VAC assessing the same clients using different sets of policies, programs, and requirements.^{Footnote 24} Another issue has been a lack of information sharing between the CAF and VAC rehabilitation programs.^{Footnote 25} Thus, the transfer of medical records between CAF and VAC has been challenging due in part to the Privacy Act, but recent initiatives have improved the efficiencies in the exchange of electronic medical information. The current process requires members to re-tell their stories to different people in three distinct organizations – thereby taking away from the energy required for medically-releasing members to get well and move forward with their lives outside of the CAF.^{Footnote 26} This often creates a level of uncertainty when a member is released from the CAF before all benefits and services have been confirmed and put in place.^{Footnote 27}

Furthermore, the existence of similar and often overlapping programs within CAF, VAC and SISIP adds to the complexity of the process. In particular, the existence of similar income support and vocational rehabilitation programs created confusion and difficulties for members, veterans and program staff. SISIP’s Vocational Rehabilitation Program, VAC’s Rehabilitation Program and the CAF VRPSM for ill and injured each have different eligibility criteria, different rules, assessment requirements and benefits. However, there is no mechanism to ensure the coordination of benefits or to verify that members are getting the best support to meet their needs. Moreover, the CAF, SISIP and VAC case managers do not have the same professional backgrounds or the same responsibilities.^{Footnote 28} Several HQ interviewees noted that the lack of consistency in CAF and VAC case managers’ training often leaves members and veterans feeling confused and left to their own devices. One interviewee stated that communication to members and veterans about benefits and services needs improvement, and the flow of information between the CAF and VAC needs to be better organized.

Several changes affecting the transition process were introduced in recent years, with mixed effects on the transition process. Changes to the Career Transition Services Program, implemented in 2012, clearly established that the CAF handles the members’ needs up to the day of release and then VAC takes over. This change resulted in a program design flaw in relation to employment, as studies have shown that the most appropriate time to render assistance relating to the pursuit of employment is before the member becomes unemployed (i.e., before the member’s release).^{Footnote 29} In 2015, VAC had a legislative mandate change allowing it to work with CAF members still serving, as VAC case managers were integrated into the IPSC. This has improved the integration of CAF and VAC services as they were able to work more closely together, but the lack of proper manning still affects the system.^{Footnote 30} Furthermore, several B/W key informants reported that VAC’s 2016 changes to pension administration introduced additional challenges for the members, preventing them from accessing pension centres and getting information on the estimate of their pensions.

Inconsistent quality of and access to services

The evaluation found that the historical transition services have been inconsistent in their quality, including services availability, timeliness and frequency of services, and accessibility of services across geographic locations and online.

A 2017 survey found that 70 percent of Regular Force respondents were satisfied with the timeliness of transition program information provided to them.^{Footnote 31} However, some accessibility issues were noted in the SCAN seminar feedback forms and interviews with key informants. Although half of feedback form respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the seminar runs often enough that they can attend when needed (51 percent), this represents a lower level of agreement than for other aspects of the seminar. Respondents from B/Ws west of Ontario (ON) were less likely to agree that the seminar runs often enough, while those in ON and medically releasing members were more likely to agree. The availability of the seminar was a fairly common criticism noted in the open-ended section of the feedback form. A few interviewees, both at the HQ and B/Ws, reported that there have been issues with the capacity to deliver services in a timely manner, resulting in long wait times to access services. For example, a few HQ interviewees noted that pension delays have been a major concern, and priority hiring processes for medically releasing members has been lengthy and inefficient. Interviewees also noted that SCAN seminars only run once a year and are inconsistent in their quality.

Evidence from the literature review and interviews also suggests that the quality and accessibility of transition services varies across the country. Nearly half of all interviewees reported that service accessibility varies depending on geographic location, and access to transition services may be more limited or challenging for CAF members located in remote areas as it often requires travel. All interviewees in the National Capital Region (NCR) commented that transition services are spread out, and some locations are remote and inconvenient for many members. Interviewees noted that, in some places (e.g., Petawawa), key services are concentrated and easy to access, but in other areas members often need to travel to access services: distance to services was noted as a barrier by interviewees in Edmonton and Valcartier. Accessibility is especially challenging for releasing members outside of large urban areas who require mental health services, as their access to these services can be limited compared to releasing members close to wing/base/large urban areas.

Literature review and interview data also indicate that more programming is being offered to medically releasing members compared to non-medically releasing members, as a large number of services are specifically designed to address the needs of medically releasing members. Non-medically releasing members have access to limited support while they are still serving.^{Footnote 32} Findings from previous studies suggest that an employment strategy to address the needs of all releasing CAF members is required.^{Footnote 33} Several HQ interviewees noted that there is a need to address gaps in services after CAF members’ transition, in particular in finding employment and connecting CAF members to potential employers.

Additionally, several interviewees identified accessing information and forms online as a barrier. They reported that the need to use the Defence Wide Area Network versus Internet makes access to services more difficult and limiting for some CAF members. The interviewees noted that information and forms should be accessible online and not limited to the internal network.

Limited and inconsistent communication about transition services

Evaluation evidence suggests that, while almost all members receive some form of information on transition services prior to their release, the quality of that information is inconsistent, leading to limited awareness and understanding of available services among CAF members. Previous studies found that members, veterans and their families do not understand what they are entitled to.^{Footnote 34} Several key informants, both at the HQ and B/W, also reported that many CAF members lack or have insufficient awareness and knowledge of the various programs available to them. The interviewees stated that there is a need for a consistent approach in getting information out to CAF members to help guide them through the transition process. Several HQ interviewees noted that the abundance of information from various sources makes it difficult for members to navigate and that the messages they get are often inconsistent and confusing. Similarly, several B/W interviewees noted challenges in disseminating information and advertising services, as well as sharing information among stakeholders.

This lack of awareness often leads to members and veterans not accessing the services they are entitled to. Feedback forms from SCAN seminars revealed that the dearth of advertising and communication about the seminar was the most frequent complaint (representing 18 percent of comments received). Despite this, half of respondents (52 percent) agreed or strongly agreed that the seminar was well advertised in advance of the date it was held. Participants from ON bases were more likely to agree with this than those from other regions. While the results of the 2018 CAF Transition and Wellbeing Survey (CAFTWS) show that the majority (over 80 percent) of CAF members attend a SCAN seminar prior to their release, the majority of B/W interviewees noted that many members struggle with information overload during the seminars and wish they had attended these seminars sooner. Part of the issue is that there is low awareness of SCAN seminars among CAF members, including medical SCAN seminars, as these seminars are not mandatory. Often members only attend these seminars shortly prior to release, and struggle with retaining the information provided to them at that time.^{Footnote 35} Results from the SCAN feedback forms reviewed for this evaluation suggest that the time and availability of SCAN seminars may also affect attendance. Some participants commented that these seminars need to be more frequent and accessible, and the information needs to be provided in a more straightforward manner, possibly in several sessions to reduce information overload.

Finally, the stigma of signalling an intent to leave the CAF may dissuade some members from participating. Some members choose not to attend SCAN seminars because of the stigma associated with attending a SCAN event, as there is a perception that attending a seminar may signal to the others that the members wants to leave CAF.^{Footnote 36} A few B/W interviewees noted that there is still stigma around asking for help and the associated perception of weakness. Many members do not ask for help or access transition services because they fear judgement, actual impact on their careers, etc. Several interviewees noted that, while the services provided are for the most part excellent and there are sufficient services being offered, many members choose not to attend SCAN seminars because they are not mandatory. The interviewees commented that those members who choose not to attend do not receive the information about transition services and how to access them in a timely manner, and are left to navigate the transition process on their own.

While gaps in the ability of historic transition services to meet the needs of transitioning members have been identified, there is evidence that the new program addresses these gaps. In addition, the most important stakeholders have been involved in the design of the new program. As such, the new program design addresses the gaps and previously identified recommendations.

There is a widespread perception that the new program is well designed. The majority of HQ interviewees agreed that the new program is on the right track, and will introduce improvements to the transition process. Similarly, the majority of HQ interviewees agreed that sufficient consultations have been conducted, and all the most important stakeholders, both internal and external to the CAF, have been involved in the design. Several interviewees also suggested that bringing in help from organizations outside government – such as employers – would be beneficial later on in the program’s development.

Some of the key features of the new program that address gaps identified in the previous studies’ recommendations include:

One-stop service: To address known challenges around the quality, availability and consistency of information on transition and transition services, the CAF TG will provide information and direction on all aspects of a member’s transition from military to civilian life in the form of both physical and online assistance in a cohesive “one-stop shop” format. Already, an online portal has been established as a central repository of information and guidance. Similarly, changes are underway to establish CAF TCs across Canada, which will gather together transition-related services into one location on each base. Several HQ interviewees were optimistic that the new program will improve communication to both members and the Chain of Command with guidance on available tools, services and resources.
Greater integration between CAF and VAC: The CAF TG has been working closely with colleagues in VAC to improve the “seamlessness” of members’ transition experience. Under the new design, for example, members will register for a My VAC Account after recruitment (at a point to be determined), which will inform them about Government of Canada (GC)/CAF/VAC tools and portals that will assist them in their transition, and will advise about VAC benefits and services and guide members through the online application process.
Mandatory participation: As previously noted, the rate of participation in CAF transition services has been an issue in the past, in part due to the stigma of signalling one’s intent to leave the military. The new Program will include mandatory participation of certain release services such as the ETT to ensure members and their families are made more aware of what services and benefits are available.

As noted by several HQ interviewees, the staged approach to the implementation of the new Program also improves its chances of success. The new transition process is being trialled in Borden, starting with war gaming of the system on historical personnel files, followed by implementation on real transitioning members. As several interviewees pointed out, this approach provides an opportunity for mid-course corrections before scaling up nationwide.

There is also evidence that the new Transition Program has been responsive to previous recommendations made by oversight bodies. The effectiveness of support provided by CAF to transitioning members has been extensively reviewed. Within the past five years (FY 2013/14 to FY 2017/18), there have been nine reports related to military-to-civilian transition from the CDS, DGE, DND and VAC Ombudsmen, and the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs (ACVA).^{Footnote 37} In total, these reviews resulted in 79 key recommendations.

This evaluation examined the 20 key recommendations from these reviews that were within the purview of the MTP.^{Footnote 38} Of these, the majority have already been incorporated into existing services and support, or are incorporated into the design for the new MTP (see Table 4).

Table 4. Incorporation of Recommendations from Previous Reviews. This table shows the extent to which recommendations from previous reviews have been incorporated into the design of the new MTP.
Source	Incorporated	Not fully incorporated	Total
ACVA	8	3	11
CDS	4	-	4
DGE	2	-	2
DND/CAF and VAC Ombudsmen	3	-	3
Total	17	3	20

Table 4 Details - Extent to which recommendations from previous reviews have been incorporated into the design of the new MTP

Table 4 Summary:

This evaluation examined the 20 key recommendations from these reviews that were within the purview of the MTP. Of these, the majority have already been incorporated into existing services and support, or are incorporated into the design for the new MTP.

The table has four columns and six rows. The columns are labelled source, incorporated, not fully incorporated and total. The rows outline data for ACVA, CDS, DGE, Ombudsmen and the total.

ACVA has incorporated 8 recommendations from previous reviews into the design of the new MTP and 3 have not been fully incorporated (total of 11).

CDS has incorporated 4 recommendations from previous reviews into the design of the new

MTP and zero have not been fully incorporated (total of 4).

DGE has incorporated 2 recommendations from previous reviews into the design of the new MTP and zero have not been fully incorporated (total of 2).

The Ombudsmen has incorporated 3 recommendations from previous reviews into the design of the new MTP and zero have not been fully incorporated (total of 3).

Overall, 17 recommendations have been incorporated from previous reviews into the design of the new MTP and 3 have not been fully incorporated (total of 20).

The three recommendations that have not been fully incorporated all pertain to benefits or other items that should be in place on release. The CAF has addressed this need by initiating a Release Renewal effort, including an electronic tracking tool to ensure that key benefits are in place by the time of a member’s release. However, this process only covers CAF/SISIP benefits plus the most significant VAC benefits. ACVA’s reports go further than this, recommending a greater number of items be in place for medically releasing members (e.g., adequate housing options, access to gainful employment options) the lack of which would not normally trigger a delayed release, under the currently-envisaged process. As such, these issues form part of the business process re-engineering based on recognized domains of well-being that will continue into FY 2019/20 and beyond. As part of the new approach, an assessment will be developed to inform a decision maker of a member’s readiness for transition and, for medically releasing members, the status of these items would form a part of that assessment. The intent is to develop service delivery solutions that will ensure these benefits are in place at the time of release.

More needs to be done to capture the performance of transition activities currently taking place within the CAF. To date, the development of the Military Transition PIP has focused on what the new approach will be at FOC, but performance data for the entire program, including the ongoing activities currently being carried out, should be systematically collected and analyzed. It is important, for a number of reasons, to ensure this information is included in the new performance measurement system being developed.

The performance measurement system for the MTP is currently being revised. The directive for the establishment of a CAF TG listed as one of the strategic objectives of this initiative, a “comprehensive CAF/VAC performance and outcome measurement strategy and plan for Transition Services.”^{Footnote 39} A working group was formed as part of this evaluation to continue development of the PIP, which documents the strategy for performance measurement as per the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) Policy on Results (2016). The new approach to military transition as announced in SSE differs markedly from historical activities, so performance measurement is being extensively revised.

Some performance measurement for historic transition services is taking place, but the data from this activity is not being aggregated and stored systematically. For example, SCAN seminars and workshops must administer a participant evaluation form as per Defence Administrative Orders and Directives (DAOD) 5031-4. Participants fill these out, but the data have not been collected and analysed at the national level. In addition, Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis (DGMPRA) carries out surveys, including the annual Your Say Survey, which touches on transition services. The results are reported by DGMPRA, but there is no indication that the sections on transition are being fed into a performance measurement system for the program.

It is important to capture the performance of historic transition services. All bases outside of Borden will continue implementing these services for several years to come. Some of the historic activities will remain relatively unchanged in the new program. Since all DND/CAF activities must be represented in one of the programs in its program inventory, all transition services currently being carried out should be considered part of DRF program 3.5, the MTP.

ADM(RS) Recommendation

There is an abundance of evidence on what makes for a successful transition. Transition from military to civilian life has been well researched, and from this we can draw a reasonable understanding of how to define and measure the success of transition and the factors that affect this success. However, some factors, such as gender, have not yet been sufficiently studied.

According to available research, most CAF members’ transition to civilian life is successful, but a sizeable minority – somewhere between 25 and 40 percent – experience an unsuccessful transition.^{Footnote 40} Irrespective of one’s “success,” the majority of veterans (57 percent) considered their transition at least “fairly difficult,” according to one study.^{Footnote 41}

The characteristics of a successful transition are complex and different for each veteran. As pointed out by several interviewees, the success of transition depends on the individual member and how one defines success. The literature suggests a number of areas that may affect whether or not a veteran considers his or her transition to be successful, including:^{Footnote 42}

social/family support;
financial stability;
health concerns – both physical and mental;
sense of purpose/identity;
availability of housing; and
satisfying employment.

CAF, in conjunction with VAC, have developed a conceptual framework for military transition that describes seven “domains of well-being,” encompassing the afore-mentioned and other areas.^{Footnote 43} Together, these domains can be considered a measure of a successful transition.

Using these areas as our measure of success, veterans’ wellness compares somewhat unfavourably to that of the average Canadian:

Health: Veterans, and in particular Junior Non-Commissioned Members (NCMs), have higher incidences of chronic health conditions, such as arthritis, depression, anxiety and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, than Canadians of comparable age and sex. Although veterans report about the same rate of life stress as the Canadian public, they are more likely to suffer from mental health disorders than serving military members, and about two to three times more susceptible than comparable Canadians.^{Footnote 44}
Employment and finances: Close to 90 percent of veterans worked after transition.^{Footnote 45} Veterans report lower workforce participation rates than comparable Canadians, but generally have higher income, and the majority are satisfied with their finances.^{Footnote 46}
Housing: There is some evidence that housing may be a challenge for many veterans. While veterans make up about 2 percent of the Canadian population, they represent about 6 - 7 percent of the homeless population.^{Footnote 47} Veteran homelessness does not appear to be well researched in Canada.
Social support and community belonging: Veterans benefit from high levels of social support: 96 percent agreed they had people to count on in an emergency; in most cases, their partner. However, they reported lower levels of satisfaction with life and community belonging.^{Footnote 48}

The factors influencing success – the circumstances that increase or decrease the likelihood of a successful transition – are also well known. The most influential factors affecting transition success appear to be:

Rank: The rank of the member at the time of release is a big factor influencing success across many variables.^{Footnote 49} For example, according to the Life After Service Survey (LASS) program of research, only 17 percent of officers experienced a difficult adjustment to civilian life, compared to 39 percent of Junior NCMs.^{Footnote 50} Among HQ interviewees, several identified rank as a contributing factor.
Health status: The physical and mental health of the member, particularly whether or not the member is medically releasing, is a large factor according to a number of studies.^{Footnote 51} Health was mentioned by several HQ interviewees and the majority of B/W interviewees, in particular relating to members who are medically releasing and those suffering from mental health issues. In addition to the complication provided by their medical condition, their transition success is affected by the fact that the member had not planned to release and may therefore be less prepared for it.
Education: Having completed college or university helps facilitate the transition process.^{Footnote 52}

Other factors such as involuntary releases, mid-career releases and Army releases (as compared to Navy or Air Force) affect how difficult the transition is, whereas in at least one study, marital status (social support network) and number of deployments were not found to be associated with difficult adjustments to civilian life.^{Footnote 53} Several HQ interviewees also perceived occupation to be a contributing factor to success. This is related to education, but has the added dimension of relevance to the private sector (e.g., an engineer may have more employable skills than someone trained in combat arms).

Previously it was thought that the ill and injured experienced the most difficulties in transition (hence the primary focus of CAF transition services directed towards the medically releasing); however, the evidence shows that the majority of members who experience difficulties are not medically releasing: “We've been concentrating on the medically releasing, and now we have to make sure we're taking care of the non-medically.”^{Footnote 54}

There has been a lack of academic research on the effects on women transitioning to civilian life.^{Footnote 55} One study on veterans found sex was not associated with a difficult adjustment to civilian life.^{Footnote 56} Similarly, analysis of SCAN evaluation forms as part of this evaluation found no differences by gender. However, another survey found that women were more likely than men to experience challenges in transition, including loss of identity, finding a health care provider and navigating benefits for veterans.^{Footnote 57} Furthermore, experts underscore the complicating factors of “the unique gendered experiences, trauma, and issues women must confront in transition.”^{Footnote 58}

One of the reasons for this lack of evidence may be because of the historic under-representation of women in the CAF. As the number of women in the CAF has grown, so has the number releasing from the CAF. At one point in time, studies on veterans may have been challenged to find meaningful results by gender due to small sub-group sizes. The growth in female veterans presents an opportunity for more study in this area, particularly given the renewed emphasis of the federal government on Gender-Based Analysis. For this reason, the CAF may wish to consider more study in this area.

Personnel who deliver transition services, and the CAF members who participate in them, perceive transition services to be effective in contributing towards a more successful transition. However, the evidence supporting this is limited because performance measurement for this program does not track CAF members post-release.

The majority of CAF members who participate in CAF transition services believe that these services would contribute to a more successful transition. In a 2017 survey of CAF members, over half (55 percent) of respondents felt they were better prepared to transition out of the military after using transition services.^{Footnote 59} From SCAN seminar feedback forms, two thirds of participants (67 percent) agreed or strongly agreed that the information they gained from the seminar would help them to be more prepared for their transition to civilian life. However, in both of these cases the respondents were surveyed prior to release, therefore, the actual success of transition could not be assessed.

Personnel involved in CAF transition services also perceive the services as effective. The large majority of interviewees reported that CAF services affect members’ transition in a positive way. A few others were of the view that transition success largely depends on the members themselves – if they are actively engaged, the results are usually positive. A few interviewees noted some negative effects of the CAF’s transition services, including complexity/difficulty in navigating the system, time gap between release and benefits and stigma of accessing medical services.

Some of the most positive aspects of CAF transition services, according to interviewees, are:

The CAF vocational rehabilitation program, which provides “voluntary and early engagement, walking them through the process;”
CAF TG services for ill & injured, which support members through transition; and
Coordination with other partners who provide transition services and benefits.

However, the contribution of CAF transition services to transition success cannot be assessed because CAF members are not tracked after release. The majority of HQ interviewees and several B/W personnel commented on the lack of tracking measures to determine transition success. A few mentioned that specific programs, such as Vocational Rehabilitation, may track their own participants.

Other agencies track some veterans in Canada. For example, VAC maintains records for its clients. However, not all veterans are VAC clients, so this list would not be comprehensive. Secondly, VAC records would not identify the extent of members’ participation in CAF transition services. Because of this, transition outcomes cannot be linked to services provided, and it is therefore not possible to assess the contribution of CAF transition services to the members’ success post-release.

There are several options available for establishing a tracking system for transition members. The CAF TG may wish to collaborate with VAC to supplement their records. They may also wish to work with DGMPRA, who carry out studies on veterans in collaboration with VAC. A recent survey by DGMPRA, whose full results are yet to be published, ask questions on both use of CAF transition services and success of release.^{Footnote 60} The CAF TG may also wish to contact veterans themselves; civilian contact information for all releasing members will be available on the Canadian Armed Forces Release Administration (CAFRA) tool. In this case, the CAF TG would need to negotiate with DGCB the inclusion of prior informed consent language at the time of collection of this information.

The Transition Trial at CFB Borden of the new transition process presents an opportunity to compare outcomes for members participating in different approaches to transition services. Adequate performance measurement could help identify which aspects of the new program are working as intended and which may need some correction, prior to scaling up nation-wide. In order to do so, data on veterans released from Borden during the trial period, and those released from other bases, should be collected and compared to each other.

ADM(RS) Recommendation

The design of the new MTP addresses the available evidence on what makes for a successful transition by recognizing the complex and personal nature of transition success. While historical transition services have been focused largely on the medically releasing with less attention to the rest of the CAF, the literature paints a more complex picture of who is most in need of support. As described in Finding 4, the majority of veterans who suffered a difficult transition were not necessarily medically released.

The new Program will adopt an evidence-based approach to identify members’ needs. Under the new process, transitioning members will undergo an assessment based on a conceptual framework identifying domains of well-being, founded on evidence of what makes for a successful transition. This assessment will identify who is in need of support and in what areas and will, therefore, help guide the transition process for each individual.

The new program is also anticipated to improve transition outcomes by ensuring benefits are in place on release. In the past, many recently-released veterans endured a gap in income while waiting for their benefits to kick in. The CAF is working to address this through development of the CAFRA system, which will monitor the release process of each CAF member and ensure that the key benefits are in place at the time of their release.

It is likely that these design changes will contribute to improving outcomes for transitioning members; however, the program will not be able to demonstrate its success in the absence of adequate performance measurement. As described in Finding 5 and associated Recommendation 3, the CAF TG should ensure it will be able to demonstrate the success of the new program by establishing a systematic approach to tracking members following their release.

Back to Table of Contents

2.3 Efficiency

This evaluation was unsuccessful in assessing the anticipated cost effectiveness of the new MTP at FOC, and comparing it to that of the historical program. There is some evidence that the resourcing of historical transition services has been insufficient, but it is unclear whether or not the increased resources anticipated for the new program will be sufficient.

It is not possible to assess the cost effectiveness of either the historic transition services or the new Transition Program for the following reasons:

the design of the new MTP is still evolving. Key aspects of the program such as specifics of its approach, activities and resourcing are still to be confirmed;
resources, both personnel and financial, for the new Program have yet to be confirmed; and
there is a lack of performance measurement data for the historic program (See Findings 3 and 5).

In addition, historical financial data may not capture the full cost of CAF transition services. Expenditures in past years for the “Transition and Release” sub-program is primarily personnel related (e.g., salaries, allowances and benefits). However, there are a number of costs associated with running events as part of the SCAN program that are not captured in these figures, as shown in Table 5.^{Footnote 61} These costs should be considered part of the MTP.

Table 5. SCAN expenditures, FY 2013/14 to 2017/18. This table shows a number of costs associated with running events as part of the SCAN program.
-	2013/14	2014/15	2015/16	2016/17	2017/18
Travel	$51,188	$66,245	$63,914	$53,545	$41,732
Food, hospitality and fees	$35,498	$28,342	$41,314	$53,699	$34,858
Business services	$33,241	$35,724	$15,027	$8,077	$11,246
Supplies	$2,302	$2,584	$4,528	$3,559	$4,279
Total	$122,230	$132,895	$124,783	$118,880	$92,116

Table 5 Details - SCAN expenditures, FY 2013/14 to 2017/18

Table 5 Summary:

There are a number of costs associated with running events as part of the SCAN program that are not captured in these figures. These costs should be considered part of the MTP.

This table has six columns and six rows. The first column has no header. The second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth columns contain the headers 2013/14, 2014/15, 2015/16, 2016/17, and 2017/18. The second row is titled “Travel”, the third row is “Food, hospitality and fees”, the fourth row is “Business Services,” the fifth row is “Supplies” and the sixth row is “Totals.” Read across the rows to see the dollar amount spent in each fiscal year in each of the categories.

Expenditures for travel for FY 2013/14 was $51,188, for FY 2014/15 it was $66,245, for FY 2015/16 is was $63,914, for FY 2016/17 was $53,545 and for FY 2017/18 it was $41,732.

Expenditures for food, hospitality and fees for FY 2013/14 was $35,498, for FY 2014/15 it was $28,342, for FY 2015/16 is was $41,314, for FY 2016/17 was $53,699 and for FY 2017/18 it was $34,858.

Expenditures for business services for FY 2013/14 was $33,241, for FY 2014/15 it was $35,724, for FY 2015/16 is was $15,027, for FY 2016/17 was $8,077 and for FY 2017/18 it was $11,246.

Expenditures for supplies for FY 2013/14 was $2,302, for FY 2014/15 it was $2,584, for FY 2015/16 is was $4,528, for FY 2016/17 was $3,559 and for FY 2017/18 it was $4,279.

The total expenditures for travel, food/hospitality and fees, business services, and supplies for FY 2013/14 was $122,230, for FY 2014/15 it was $132,895, for FY 2015/16 is was $124,783, for FY 2016/17 was $118,880 and for FY 2017/18 it was $92,116.

Although cost effectiveness cannot be assessed, there is evidence of inadequate resourcing for the historic transition program. Expenditures for the program averaged less than $1,500 per releasing member from FY 2014/15 to 2016/17.^{Footnote 62} Several B/W interviewees commented on the need for more personnel and resources to carry out transition services. In many sections, B/W PSO positions are short-staffed, and as a result services cannot be provided at full capacity. Similarly, JPSU has chronically been short-staffed, accorded the lowest priority level for staffing from 2008 to 2014, and as a result focused its inadequate resources on its growing complement of ill and injured to the detriment of other transition services.^{Footnote 63}

It is unknown whether or not the issue of under-resourcing will be fully rectified under the new program. In FY 2017/18, it was estimated that about 250 FTEs within the CAF were devoted to transition services and release, up from 95 in FY 2016/17.^{Footnote 64} This number is expected to increase significantly when the program is fully implemented.^{Footnote 65} Unlike in the past, the new Transition Program will be accorded a priority posting. However, the workload of the new CAF TG will increase as well, for a number of reasons:

New services: As described in Section 1.2, the new Transition Program will offer more services and tools to CAF members than were previously available;
Expanded coverage: While in the past CAF transition services were primarily oriented towards medically releasing members, the renewed Transition Program will provide expanded support to all honourably-released CAF members; and
Increased number of releases: As the size of the CAF increases under SSE over the coming seven years, the average number of releases is expected to increase as well.^{Footnote 66} This, plus the greater Regular Force Strength overall, will likely result in a higher demand for transition services.

Due to the remaining uncertainties around the design of the MTP, it is impossible to assess at this point if the anticipated extra workload corresponds with the projected increase in personnel. For the same reason, it is not possible to assess whether or not the anticipated outcomes arising from this new approach, in the form of greater success in members’ transitions, merit the extra costs associated with the program’s delivery.

ADM(RS) Recommendation

ADM (RS) Recommendation

Table A-1. MAP for Recommendation 1. This table outlines the Management Action Plan for Recommendation 1.
Narrative	Action	Target Date	OPI
CAF TG/VAC Outreach Engagements - Canadian Armed Forces Transition Group in partnership with Veterans Affairs Canada will conduct engagement and outreach nationwide from January to March 2019 in order to provide a heightened level of awareness for leaders and stakeholders and also for CAF members and their families with regard to Military Transition.	-	Jan – Mar 2019. Yearly reviews provided thereafter.	Comd CAF TG /VAC
	Op Transition Fragmentary Order 001 and subsequent FRAG Os as CAF TG evolves and FOC is achieved.	Dec 2019	-
My Transition Services App - The CAF Transition app was put in place to assist all military members and their families with a seamless transition. The platform will also provide up-to-date information on existing and new services as they are developed.	-	Dec 2018	Comd CAF TG
My Transition Guide has been published and is available for members and their families and available in print and online at: HTTPS://WWW.CANADA.CA/MILITARY-TRANSITION	-	Dec 2019 – Review	Comd CAF TG
Training and Education
Transition Training (ETT) course, which is mandatory for Transitioning CAF members, is also available on the Defence Learning Network. HTTPS://WWW.CANADA.CA/MILITARY-TRANSITION	Mandatory as of April 1, 2019 for all Transitioning Reg F and P Res members. These modules will provide CAF members with a detailed overview of transition. Thereby, ensuring they are better prepared for transition to civilian life. Through continuous improvement the course will be evaluated and updated based on best practices and the requirements for transitioning members. Certification following the completion of the course will ensure training package has been delivered. Training will be tracked through the Defence Learning Network and Transition Process. Critical information is made openly accessible to families, veterans, and deployed/ OUTCAN CAF members through the SCAN on-line. Analytics will be collected on user activity. Participants will be able to provide feedback on the training package.	Live on December 10, 2018 and Mandatory effective April 1, 2019	Comd CAF TG
For Families and CAF Members and Veterans Second Career Assistance Network (SCAN) Seminars are online. CAF members and their families can now access transition seminars anywhere and anytime. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/benefits-military/transition/scan.html	Analytics will be collected on user activity. Participants will be able to provide feedback on the training package.	Dec 2020 - Data analysis	-
In-Class Second Career Assistance Network (SCAN) Seminars	-	-	-
The Guide to Benefits, Programs and Services for Serving and Former CAF Members and their Families is available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/guide.html	The Guide – Provides key information to CAF members and their families on programs and services administered by the CAF TG. The Guide differs from My Transition Guide as it pertains exclusively to services for ill and injured Members and is not necessarily Transition specific.	Dec 2020 - Review	Comd CAF TG

Table A-1 Details - MAP for Recommendation 1

ADM (RS) Recommendation

Table A-2. MAP for Recommendation 2. This table outlines the Management Action Plan for Recommendation 2.
Narrative	Action	Target Date	OPI
Joint CDS/DM Directive: Op TRANSITION - Clear direction has been provided regarding Lines of Operation, Critical Information Requirements and Tasking and Supporting Requirements (Ref C. Para 16,17 & 18) along with the defined phases from Initial Operational Capability (IOC) to FOC.	CAF TG is developing an analytics strategy that will be used to advance business data identification and collection from IOC to FOC. Data defined and collected will be used to further develop the PIP. Performance Information Profile development has begun for FY 2018/19 and an interim program level indicator was developed and will be reported upon. Further work will be required in order to draft a logic model and to identify the segments for the program. All financials will align to segment level for FY 19/20.	Dec 2020	Comd CAF TG /DMPPPC
Transition Trial - SSE Initiatives 27 & 28 directed the CAF to create the CAF Transition Group which will provide support to all members in transition to post-military life and to ensure that all benefits are in place prior to that transition.	In order to test, adjust and validate new release and transition processes under these two initiatives, a Transition Trial at CFB Borden will be initiated by CAF TG HQ. Though DGCB is responsible for the release administration process, the CAF TG planning staff (Borden Trial OPI) is working closely with DGCB in order to integrate processes and lessons learned from the release administration into the overarching transition process. Performance Management, Analytics to be developed throughout the Transition Trial.	Sep 2019 - Initial report and annual reports thereafter.	Comd CAF TG
JPSU/CAF TG Satisfaction Survey – Administered to actively serving CAF ill and injured members who were accessing the former JPSU in order to assess their experiences and satisfaction.	Data collection for the Survey is currently on-going. Consultation with DGMPRA to occur iot determine timings of future cycle administration.	Apr 2020 - Findings to be released	Comd CAF TG/ DGMPRA
Life After Service Survey (LASS) - A survey conducted by VAC on Transition outcomes for all CAF members.	Continual administration by VAC. CAF TG will coordinate with VAC. The previous LASS was administered in 2016 and the next survey will occur in FY 19/20.	Dec 2019 and every three years thereafter	VAC/ DGMPRA
Return to Duty Analytics Trial	Determine the effectiveness of the Return to Duty program by developing an effective mechanism of data collection and tracking in order to ensure that both timely referrals occur and appropriate screening for selection; thereby resulting in optimal outcomes.	Dec 2019 – Prelim results will be available	Comd CAF TG / DGMPRA

Table A-2 Details - MAP for Recommendation 2

ADM (RS) Recommendation

Table A-3. MAP for Recommendation 3. This table outlines the Management Action Plan for Recommendation 3.
Narrative	Action	Target Date	OPI
Once all required resources and processes are in place, CAF TG, formerly the JPSU, will deliver professional, personalized and standardized transition assistance to all Regular and Primary Reserve members and their families, with special care and attention being provided to those who are ill and injured. CAF TG will be a learning organization whose capabilities will continue to develop beyond IOC, over the longer term, to deliver on the full requirements of SSE 27, and provide enhanced services to all members of the CAF.	CAF TG will address multiple domains of well-being in order to assist members and their families with a successful transition, including: health, finances, housing, social integration, purpose, life skills and preparedness, and culture and social environment. Upon validation of new processes and tools through the trial/proof-of-concept mechanism, and as additional CAF TG capability is built, they will be rolled out across the CAF for standardization and wider implementation. At FOC, the CAF TG will ensure that: CAF members are educated and better trained for transition earlier in their careers; Each CAF member has undergone mandatory transition training; Each CAF member has achieved transition readiness standards in training and education; A transition interview will take place based on the Domains of Well-Being; The member develops their transition plan and is guided through the transition process; The member is fully informed of, and administration is completed for, all applicable benefits, to enable their future success; All CAF members, veterans, and their families will have access to the full suite of professional, personalized and standardized transition services, aligned across the DND/CAF, VAC and other supporting agencies; and CAF TG will validate that each CAF member and their family are ready to transition. DND will request a continual administration by Statistics Canada. CAF TG will coordinate with Statistics Canada. The previous CAFTWS was administered in 2017, and it will be requested that the next survey occur in FY 20/21 and every 3 years thereafter. See the following for some initial findings. Key challenges identified included finding a health care provider; losing military identity, and understanding VAC services and benefits. Health and Health Needs: Results pointed to a stark difference between medically and non-medically released CAF members. Specifically, whereas close to 60 percent of medically released members rated their health as poor/fair, over 60 percent of non-medically released members rated their health as very good/excellent. Most commonly reported chronic conditions include: chronic pain, hearing problems, arthritis, mood disorder (e.g., depression). Interpersonal Relationships and Social Well-Being: In all cases, for the majority of former CAF members, the quality of life of their family had either stayed the same or improved. There were important differences between medically released and non-medically released CAF members. In particular, whereas medically released members: Most frequently reported that their family’s quality of life had stayed the same since their release (37 percent), non-medically released CAF members most frequently reported that it had improved (55 percent). Programs and Services Use: Vast majority have participated in the VAC Transition Interview and/or the SCAN transition seminar	Sep 2024	Comd CAF TG
	Continual administration by VAC. CAF TG will coordinate with VAC. The previous Life After Service Survey (LASS) was administered in 2016 and the next survey will occur in FY 19/20. See the following for some initial findings: Adjustment to Civilian Life - Over half of Regular Force Veterans (52 percent) reported an easy adjustment to civilian life. However, 32 percent had difficulty. Factors associated with difficult adjustment included low rank at release, less than 10 years of service, unemployment and chronic health conditions. Employment - In 2016, 65 percent of Regular Force Veterans were working. Their unemployment rate was similar to that of comparable Canadians (both about 8 percent). Of those who were working, 81 percent were satisfied with their job. Low Income - At 4 percent, Veterans were much less likely than comparable Canadians (14 percent) to report low income (based on Statistics Canada’s Low Income Measure threshold). Most (69 percent) were satisfied with their finances. Chronic Conditions - More Common Conditions like arthritis, back problems, depression, obesity, hearing problems and activity limitations were more prevalent among Veterans than comparable Canadians. Veterans also reported chronic pain at much higher rates (41 percent vs 22 percent). Effect of Release on Families - When asked about the effect their release had on the family, most Veterans reported that the transition was easy for their children (60 percent) and their partner (57 percent). However, a difficult adjustment was reported for 17 percent of children and 28 percent of partners. Snapshot of Characteristics Mean Age = 48 Male/Female = 88 percent/12 percent Married/Common Law = 77 percent Mean Years since Release = 8.6 Served <10 years = 31 percent Served 20+ years = 54 percent Had deployed = 74 percent Satisfied with Life = 84 percent	December 2019 (Every three years thereafter)	Comd CAF TG

Table A-3 Details - MAP for Recommendation 3

ADM (RS) Recommendation

Table A-4. MAP for Recommendation 4. This table outlines the Management Action Plan for Recommendation 4.
Narrative	Action	Target Date	OPI
An in depth needs analysis was conducted to meet the multi-faceted service delivery design required for DRF 3.5. The findings identified significant resource shortfalls that need to be addressed to reach FOC 2024	CAF TG/DGMT Human Resource (HR) Priorities are aligned to the recently released defence policy and the establishment of the CAF TG. The following INCREMENTAL Human Resource priorities will guide CAF TG staffing actions (see Table A-5) After the CAF TG was stood up in late 2018, capacity building will be achieved through the DTEP process by the addition of Regular Force (Reg F) and civilian employees who will support the seamless transition of all CAF members to civilian life. A significant augmentation to CAF TG staff will be required in order to ensure a robust formation capable of the effective and efficient delivery of programs and services to ill and injured CAF personnel, transitioning CAF members, veterans and military families. Further organizational re-alignment may be required as the CAF TG is fully established and FOC is achieved. Operating Environment - CAF TG HR planning is geared to ensure efficient and effective management of the multi-faceted programs and policies relating to transition and casualty support in the CAF. The service to ill and injured members is a priority outlined in the SSE. CAF TG is responsible for the provision of support services to all military members who are injured, medically released or become ill while serving, and also to support their families and the families of the fallen. Finally, CAF TG will become responsible for supporting the transitions of over 10,000 CAF members annually as resources are allocated to the organisation and FOC is achieved. Structure - The current composition of the CAF TG is a national headquarters, nine regional Transition Units, and 32 Transition Centres dispersed across the country (See Table A-6). See Table A-7 for Incremental Requirement in order to reach FOC.	The incremental requirements are resource dependent and follow the BP cycle. In order to implement the full suite of transition services, the full incremental resources will need to be completed by 2024.	CMP/CAF TG/DMPPPC

Table A-4 Details - MAP for Recommendation 4

Table A- 5. Resources Requirements. This table shows the resource requirements for Regular Force and Public Service positions for activities within CAF TG.
DTEP^{Footnote 67} #	Year	Description	PY	FTE	Notes
7661	2019	CAF TG Stand-up	20	47	SSE directed
8822	2019	Release Renewal	0	75	Linked to SSE 28
7661	2020	CAF TG Stand-up	37	29	SSE directed
9881	2020	Soldier On	0	17	Closing the Seam
9901	2020	FTE Gap	0	28	DCSM FTE Gap
9941	2020	Transition Holding List	132	0	Closing the Seam
10043	2020	Enhanced Transition Training	0	33	Closing the Seam
10441	2020	Veteran Service Card	0	5	Closing the Seam
8483	2019	Health Services Enablers	3	14	-
8483	2020	Health Services Enablers	2	-

Table A-5 Details - Resources Requirements

Table A- 6. Current funding allocation. This table shows the current funding allocations for CAF TG.
Fund	CI	CI Type	FY19-20
L101	510	O&M	6,601,148
L111	511	DND SWE	13,983,759
L118	510	O&M	174,064
C127	512	Res Pay	10,348,633
Total			31,107,604

Table A-6 Details - Current funding allocation

Table A-7. Incremental Requirement to reach FOC. This table outlines the incremental resource requirements to reach Final Operational Capability.
Function #	L3	Function Name	Reg F	Civ	O&M CI 510	SWE CI 511	-
1	Soldier On (DTEP 9881)	-	-	17.0	$1,556,530	$1,243,700	$2,800,230
2	CAF TG Baseline shortfall (DTEP 9901)	-	-	28.0	$214,920	$2,149,200	$2,364,120
3	CAF Transition Group (DTEP 7661)	-	49.0	76.0	$677,010	$5,755,600	$6,432,610
-
4	Release Renewal (DTEP 8822)	-	-	75.0	$414,000	$4,140,000	$4,554,000
5	Enhanced Transition Course (DTEP 10043)	-	-	33.0	$1,000,000	$2,201,200	$3,201,200
6	VETERANS SERVICE CARDS (DTEP 10441)	-	-	5.0	$188,000	$281,400	$469,400
7	CAF TG Enablers (within CAF TG HHQ Lines) (CFHS DTEP 8483)	-	2.0	13.0	$604,000	$2,363,700	$2,967,700
8	CAF TG Enablers (SSE 25 - DTEP XXXX)	-	8.0	-	$200,000	-	$200,000
Total Unfunded Activities			59.0	247.0	$4,854,460	$18,134,800	$22,989,260

Table A-7 Details - Incremental Requirement to reach FOC

Table A-7 Summary:

This table has 8 columns and 11 rows. The first row contains the headers “Function#”, “L3”, “Function Name”, “Reg F”, “Civ” “O&M CI 510”, “SWE CI 511”, and one blank header for the column which contains the total dollar value of the row.

Read across the row to see the breakdown of unfunded activities. The bottom row contains the totals for each column.

ADM (RS) Recommendation

Table A-8. MAP for Recommendation 5. This table outlines the Management Action Plan for Recommendation 5.
Narrative	Action	Target Date	OPI
As part of the annual L1 Master Data Review, CAF TG Compt has developed a refined financial structure for FY 2019/20 that will better capture costs associated to its assigned program under the DRF. Within the program 3.5, there are two distinct streams (segments): 3.5.1 Care of the ill and injured 3.5.2 Transition	The table below demonstrates the lines of effort associated with each segment by the assignment of unique Cost Centers.	Apr 2019- Refine.	Comd CAF TG
	The segment related to the Care of the ill and injured will be the object of future analysis to determine what proportion of the effort/service delivery could be better aligned to the Transition Segment, i.e., the service delivery at each Transition Center and Units (CAF TG TU/TC) affects both segments of our assigned DRF Program.	Apr 2020 - Completed
	As per CDS/DM Directive Op TRANSITION: In order to capture all costs associated with all phases of Op TRANSITION, IO group: DTS SVCS has been created. All Units are to fund and capture their respective expenditures for this activity by creating a local IO and linking it to the IO Group.	Dec 2024
	As per CDS/DM Directive Op TRANSITION: All L1s to incorporate the growth of CAF Transition Units and Transition Centres into ongoing activities and Business Planning for all Bases and Wings where they are Lodger Units to provide all necessary integral support as additional personnel are hired.	-
	Once CAF TG aligns all ARAs, we will be able to capture all costs associated with Op TRANSITION.	Dec 2019
	The DRF will be used to provide strategic reporting on Op TRANSITION.	-

Table A-8 Details - MAP for Recommendation 5

Table A-9. 2019/20 Financial Structure CAF TG. This table shows the financial structure for FY 19/20 under the DRF.
2282SA	CAF TG			CANADIAN ARMED FORCE TRANSITION GROUP	DRF 3.5
2282SA- FCG	-			-	SEGMENTS
-	40649A-CCG		-	-	-	%	-	%
	-	40649A	CAF TG HHQ	CAF TRANSITION GROUP COMMAND AND CONTROL	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649B	CBI BENEFITS	CAF ILL AND INJURED BENEFITS	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649C	NKTB & FUNERAL/BURIAL	NOK TRAVEL FUNERAL BURIAL BENEFIT	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649N	CAF TG SOLIDER ON	CAF TG SOLIDER ON	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649P	CAF TG CORPORATE	CAF TRANSITION GROUP CORPORATE	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
	40649D-CCG		-	-
	-	40649D	TU - NCR	TANSITION UNIT NCR	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649E	TU - PACIFIC REG	TRANSITION UNIT PACIFIC REGION	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649F	TU - AB NORTH REG	TRANSITION UNIT ALBERTA NORTH REGION	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649G	TU - PRAIRIE REG	TRANSITION UNIT PRAIRIE REGION	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649H	TU - S ONT REG	TRANSITION UNIT SOUTH ONTARIO REGION	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649J	TU - E ONT REG	TRANSITION UNIT EASTERN ONTARIO REGION	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649K	TU - MAR REG	TRANSITION UNIT MARITIME REGION	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649L	TU - ATLANT REG	TRANSITION UNIT ATLANTIC REGION	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		40649M	TU - QUE REG	TRANSITION UNIT QUEBEC REGION	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
	50955A-CCG		-	-
	-	50955A	DCSM	DIRECTOR CASUALTY SUPPORT MANAGEMENT	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		50955B	DCSM 2	DIRECTOR CASUALTY SUPPORT MANAGEMENT 2	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		50955C	DCSM / NPSP	DIR CAS SUP MGT / NATL PEER SUPPORT PROGRAM	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
		50955J	DCSM / HOPE	DIR CAS SUP MGT / HOPE	3.5.1	100	3.5.2	0
	50955D-CCG		-	-
	-	50955D	DTSP	DIRECTOR TRANSITION SERVICES AND PROGRAMS	3.5.1	0	3.5.2	100
		50955E	DTSP 2	DIRECTOR TRANSITION SERVICES AND PROGRAMS 2	3.5.1	0	3.5.2	100
		50955F	SCAN	SECOND CAREER ASSISTANCE NETWORK	3.5.1	0	3.5.2	100
		50955G	BORDEN REL TRIAL	CAF TG RELEASE RENEWAL TRIAL	3.5.1	0	3.5.2	100
		50955H	DTSP 3	DIRECTOR TRANSITION SERVICES PROGRAMS 3	3.5.1	0	3.5.2	100

Table A-9 Details - 2019/20 Financial Structure CAF TG

Back to Table of Contents

Annex B—Evaluation Methodology and Limitations

1.0 Methodology

The evaluation used multiple lines of evidence and complementary qualitative and quantitative research methods to help ensure the reliability of information and data supporting findings. The methodology established a consistent approach in the collection and analysis of data to support evaluation findings, conclusions and recommendations.

1.1 Details on Data Collection Methods

The following evaluation methodologies were used to gather qualitative and quantitative data in the evaluation:

document and literature review;
financial and HR data analysis;
key informant interviews;
performance measurement working group; and
SCAN seminar feedback forms.

1.1.1 Document and Literature Review

An in-depth review of existing literature on military transition was a key source of data for the evaluation. The issues around the transition from military to civilian life have been extensively studied.^{Footnote 68} For this reason, the evaluation synthesized findings and recommendations from existing sources where possible, supplementing with primary data collection only where gaps were found. The literature on military transition encompasses academic studies, reviews by DND and VAC ombudsmen, evaluations and audits by VAC, DND and OAG, and reports by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Veterans’ Affairs.

A document review was also conducted on internal documents related to the Transition Program, orders and directives and other documents. The purpose of this review was primarily for questions related to program design and relevance.

1.1.2 Financial and HR Data Analysis

Historical expenditures and HR data related to transition services were collected and compared against anticipated expenditures and activities of the new Transition Program at FOC. These formed part of a cost-effectiveness analysis of the costs and benefits of the new program compared to existing services.

1.1.3 Key Informant Interviews

Key informant interviews with program stakeholders served as an important source of qualitative information and assisted in the interpretation of data from other lines of enquiry. Two groups of stakeholders were interviewed: 1) program managers and associated organizations (referred to in the report as HQ interviewees); and 2) B/W personnel involved in the delivery of transition services and products. A semi-structured interview guide was prepared for each of these two groups and sent to interviewees prior to the interview.

Interviewees in group 1 (HQ interviewees) included representatives of several directorates within CMP, as well as external representatives from VAC and SISIP.

For group 2 (B/W personnel), two to three representatives were interviewed from each of the following six bases and wings, selected to represent a mix of sizes, environments and geographic regions:

Table B-1. Bases and wings selected for interviews. This table outlines which bases and wings were represented for interviewees for the different regions.
Base/Wing	Size	Environment	Region
Marlant, Halifax	Large	Royal Canadian Navy (RCN)	East
CFB Valcartier	Large	Canadian Army (CA)	QC (Quebec)
CFB Suffield	Small	CA	West
8 Wing Trenton	Large	Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF)	ON
9 Wing Gander	Small	RCAF	East
NCR	Large	All	ON

Table B-1 Details - Bases and wings selected for interviews

Table B-1 Summary:

Interviewees in group 1 (HQ interviewees) included representatives of several directorates within CMP, as well as external representatives from VAC and SISIP.

For group 2 (B/W personnel), two to three representatives were interviewed from each of the following six bases and wings, selected to represent a mix of sizes, environments, and geographic regions:

The chart consists of 4 columns representing the Base/Wing, size environment and region. There are 6 rows representing the following bases/wings: Marlant, Halifax, Canadian Forces Base Valcartier, CFB Suffield, 8 Wing Trenton, 9 Wing Gander and NCR.

Marlant, Halifax is large in size, in the Royal Canadian Navy environment and in the East region.

Canadian Forces Base Valcartier is large in size, in the Canadian Army environment and in the Quebec region.

CFB Suffield is small in size, in the Canadian Army environment and in the West region.

8 Wing Trenton is large in size, in the Royal Canadian Air Force environment and in the Ontario region.

9 Wing Gander is small in size, in the Royal Canadian Air Force environment and in the East region.

NCR is large in size, in all environments and in the Ontario region.

The interviewees at each of these B/Ws were those with greatest knowledge of transition services and products offered at that location, most often involving the following positions:

Release Section personnel;
PSOs;
MFRC personnel, including coordinators for SCAN seminars and Veteran Family Coordinator; and
CAF TC personnel.

The interviews were conducted by telephone, with the exception of personnel located in the NCR, who were requested to participate in an in-person interview.

Table B-2 outlines the methodology for the analysis and reporting of interview data.

Table B-2. Interview Response Analysis Grid. This table displays the classification for interview responses and the corresponding percentage of interviewees.
Classification	Percentage of Interviewees
A few	> 1 to < 25%
Several	25% to < 50%
Half	50%
Majority	> 50% to < 75%
Large majority	75% to < 100%
All	100%

Table B-2 Details - Interview Response Analysis Grid

1.1.4 Performance Measurement Working Group

A working group was formed to support the development of a performance measurement system for the Transition Program, including developing measures of performance and effectiveness, and a PIP. The group consisted of subject matter experts, program staff and members of the evaluation team. Working group members contributed to the conduct of the evaluation of the Transition Program, as well as helped to ensure the program is set up to be evaluated once implemented.

1.1.5 SCAN Seminar Feedback Forms

A revised DAOD 5031-4A participant evaluation form was developed in order to obtain feedback on the SCAN seminar by participants, in a way that could be disaggregated by sub-groups of CAF members. The feedback forms were administered by the B/W PSOs as part of SCAN seminar materials. Completed forms collected at the end of the seminar were sent to DGE for input and analysis.

The form was provided to all CAF members attending a General SCAN or Medical SCAN seminar at one of the following events in October and November 2018:

Table B-3. SCAN seminars analyzed in evaluation by location and type.
Location	General SCAN	Medical SCAN
Comox	October 23-24, 2018	October 11, 2018
Esquimalt	October 24-25, 2018	October 10, 2018
Greenwood	October 22-23, 2018	October 24, 2018
Halifax	October 23-24, 2018	October 25, 2018
NCR	October 16-17, 2018	October 18, 2018
NCR Executive	November 6-7, 2018	-
North Bay	October 16, 2018	October 17, 2018
Shilo	October 24-25, 2018	October 26, 2018
Toronto	October 16-17, 2018	October 18, 2018
Winnipeg	October 23-24, 2018	October 25, 2018

Table B-3 Details - SCAN seminars analyzed in evaluation, by location and type

Table B-3 Summary:

A participant evaluation form was developed to obtain feedback on the SCAN seminar by participants. The form was provided to all CAF members attending a General SCAN or Medical SCAN seminar at one of the following events in Oct-Nov 2018.

The chart consists of 3 columns consisting of the location, general SCAN date and medical SCAN date. There are 10 rows.

The general SCAN seminar in Comox was held on October 23-24, 2018 and the medical seminar was held on October 11, 2018.

The general SCAN seminar in Esquimalt was held on October 24-25, 2018 and the medical seminar was held on October 10, 2018.

The general SCAN seminar in Greenwood was held on October 22-23, 2018 and the medical seminar was held on October 24, 2018.

The general SCAN seminar in Halifax was held on October 23-24, 2018 and the medical seminar was held on October 25, 2018.

The general SCAN seminar in the NCR was held on October 16-17, 2018 and the medical seminar was held on October 18, 2018.

The general SCAN seminar in the NCR Executive was held on November 6-7, 2018 and there was no medical seminar held.

The general SCAN seminar in the North Bay was held on October 16, 2018 and the medical seminar was held on October 17, 2018.

The general SCAN seminar in the Shilo was held on October 24-25, 2018 and the medical seminar was held on October 26, 2018.

The general SCAN seminar in the Toronto was held on October 16-17, 2018 and the medical seminar was held on October 18, 2018.

The general SCAN seminar in the Winnipeg was held on October 23-24, 2018 and the medical seminar was held on October 25, 2018.

Of the 19 seminars listed in Table B-3, however, responses for only nine were received within the timelines of the evaluation, representing a base-level response rate of 47 percent. No responses were received from bases or wings in QC. Overall, a total of 267 completed forms were received. Attendance at each event is unknown, and it is therefore impossible to calculate individual response rate, but it is estimated to be quite low. Caution should therefore be exercised when attempting to generalize the findings from the analysis of these forms.

Quantitative questions were analyzed by frequency, with statistical testing for differences by population sub-groups (e.g., release category, gender, uniform, rank and geographic region).^{Footnote 69} Qualitative responses were coded using emergent coding.

2.0 Limitations

Table B-4 describes the limitations and mitigation strategies employed in the Evaluation of the MTP.

Table B-4. Evaluation Limitations and Mitigation Strategies. List of the limitations of the evaluation and the corresponding mitigation strategy.
Limitation	Mitigation Strategy
The evaluation assessed military transition for Regular Force members only, scoping out Reserves.	Further study on Reserve Forces will need to be undertaken.
Due to concerns of survey fatigue, the evaluation did not directly contact the clients of transition services – i.e., transitioning CAF members and recently-released veterans.	To address this limitation, the evaluation analyzed feedback forms received from participants of SCAN seminars carried out within the evaluation period.
The analysis of SCAN feedback forms was hampered due to low response rate and inconsistencies in questions asked across bases.	Due to these issues, the results of the feedback forms had to be interpreted with caution. They were triangulated with other sources, such as DGMPRA Your Say survey results.
The design of the new MTP was not advanced enough at the time of evaluation to sufficiently assess it.	The ex-ante evaluation considered the details that have been proposed to date. An assessment of cost effectiveness was not undertaken.

Table B-4 Details - Evaluation Limitations and Mitigation Strategies

Table B-4 Summary:

This table describes the limitations and mitigation strategies employed in the Evaluation of the MTP. The table lists the limitations of the evaluation and the corresponding mitigation strategy.

The table has 2 columns and 5 rows. There were four limitations.

The first row contains the headers “Limitation” and “Mitigation Strategy”.

Read across the columns to discover first the limitation, and then the corresponding mitigation strategy.

The first limitation is: The evaluation assessed military transition for Regular Force members only, scoping out Reserves. The mitigation strategy in response to this limitation is: Further study on Reserve Forces will need to be undertaken.

The second limitation is: Due to concerns of survey fatigue, the evaluation did not directly contact the clients of transition services – i.e., transitioning CAF members and recently-released veterans. The mitigation strategy in response to this limitation is: To address this limitation, the evaluation analyzed feedback forms received from participants of SCAN seminars carried out within the evaluation period.

The third limitation is: The analysis of SCAN feedback forms was hampered due to low response rate and inconsistencies in questions asked across bases. The mitigation strategy in response to this limitation is: To address this limitation, the evaluation analyzed feedback forms received from participants of SCAN seminars carried out within the evaluation period.

The fourth limitation is: The design of the new MTP was not advanced enough at the time of evaluation to sufficiently assess it. The mitigation strategy in response to this limitation is: The ex-ante evaluation considered the details that have been proposed to date. An assessment of cost-effectiveness was not undertaken.

Back to Table of Contents

Annex C—Logic Model

Figure C-1 Details - Logic Model

Figure C-1 Summary:

This figure outlines a draft version of the logic model for the Military Transition Program.

There are four boxes on the left hand side showing four stages as follows: Inputs…“What we invest”, followed below by Activities… “What we do”, followed below by Outputs… “The what we produce” and lastly concludes with Outcomes… “The why…the intended effect.”

To the right of the above outline, the top box states:

Resources: FTEs, Infrastructure

Documentation: Mandate Letter to Minister, CDS orders and Directives

Influences/Drivers: Standing committee on Veteran Affairs, Parliamentary Committees, ACVA

There are two boxes, side by side, underneath the above box.

The first box states: Provide transition services and benefits to CAF members.

Provide training and development (develop and implement transition course, scan and info)
Promote, develop and implement outreach programs
Provide key advice including financial
Contribute to VAC services
Tracking of all releasesand release consultations
Preserve client privacy
Act as SME and/or sponsor for research by CAF and VAC on transition to civilian life and life after services

The second box states: Provide specific services for ill and injured.

Staff home or vehicle mods for ill and injured
Vocational rehab coordination for ill and injured
Provison of TC services (for those posted to TG and not)
Provide access to LTD and CAF VRP
Integration of CFHS and Transition Group’s programs and service delivery
Collaboration with partners and stakeholders (JPSU, Client Services, Health Services, Case Managers, BPO’s, VAC Employers, OGDs and agencies, other stakeholders (H2H, POE, MET)

There are two boxes, side by side, underneath the above boxes.

The first box states:

Outreach session held
Scan info
Participants briefed
CANFORGENS, DAODs
MPC instructions
LAW legislation
Authorized release, benefit verification and calculation
Transition course, Training sessions
Career counselling info and materials
Transition portal/guides and app

The second boxes states:

Advice, information
Co-managed programs/services (eg OSISS support groups)
Individual transition plans (ITPs) for ill and injured
Files to VAC
Casualty Notification reports
Funeral and burial reports
Support to NOK
Casualty benefits
Home/vehicle mods
Return to duty/transition to new work taskings
Transition to retirement

There are three boxes, side by side, underneath the above boxes, which represent immediate term.The first box states: Pre-release benefits administration is completed at time of release. The second box states: CAF personnel(and their families) that are aware of and/or enrolled in transition supports and services.The third box states: Ill and injured, their NOK, and families of the fallen aware and offered services unique to their needs.

There are two boxes, side by side, underneath the above boxes, which represent intermediate term.The first box states: CAF personnel are prepared for transition to post-military life.

The second box states: Ill and injured personnel are successfully re-integrated within the CAF.

The row has one box which represents ultimate term and states: (DR 3.2) The healthand well-being of the Defence team is well supported.

Back to Table of Contents

Annex D—Evaluation Matrix

Table D-1. Evaluation Matrix. This table indicates the data collection methods used to assess the evaluation issues/questions for determining the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of the MTP.
Evaluation Question	Indicators	Finding Number
Relevance & Program design
To what extent do the CAF’s current transition services meet the needs of transitioning members and their families?	Perceptions of the needs of transitioning members and families	1
	Extent to which current transition services align with stated needs	1, 3
	Level of awareness of CAF transition services available among CAF members	1, 3
	Extent to which eligible CAF members make use of CAF transition services	1, 3
	Level of satisfaction of transitioning members with CAF support provided	1, 3
To what extent do barriers exist to accessing CAF transition services?	Perceptions of barriers faced by CAF members and their families when attempting to access CAF transition services, broken down by: Gender; Health status (ill & injured, medically releasing vs others); Environment (RCN, CA, RCAF)	1
	Extent to which contextual changes in recent years have affected the needs of transitioning members and their families, or their ability to access CAF transition services	1
To what extent do differences exist across different bases in terms of the transition services offered?	Extent to which the full suite of transition services are available in each base	1
	Presence of additional transition services offered at individual bases	1
	Perceived differences in utilization rates of transition services at different bases	1
To what extent is the future Transition Program designed to affect the extent to which needs are met?	Extent to which the design of the Transition Program reflects identified gaps in services, and addresses identified barriers to access	2
	Comparison of anticipated resource levels to anticipated financial requirements	7
Effectiveness
To what extent have members and their families experienced successful transitions under the current system (as per domains of well-being)?	Evidence of success of transition in terms of: Employment; Finances; Health; Life skills and preparedness; Social integration; Housing; Cultural and social environment	4
	Self-perceived success of transition	4
	Extent to which the CAF’s transition services contributed towards the success of transition	5
To what extent have transition outcomes differed across different sub-groups?	Evidence of differences in transition outcomes by: Gender; Health status (ill & injured, medically releasing vs others); Environment (RCN, CA, RCAF)	4
To what extent is the design of the future Transition Program likely to lead to more successful transitions?	Estimate of the extent of change to transition success due to improved and expanded support to be provided	6
What are the possible unintended outcomes of the new Transition Program on internal and external stakeholders?	Stakeholder perceptions of unintended outcomes of Transition Program	2
Efficiency
How cost effective is the new Transition Program compared to the current process?	Comparison of benefits versus total costs between historical CAF transition services and new Transition Program (total costs include financial, time and opportunity costs)	7
To what extent will the new CAF TG align with other stakeholder groups?	Extent to which relevant stakeholder groups within CAF/DND are involved in program design and delivery	2
	Extent to which relevant external stakeholder groups are involved in program design and delivery	2

Table D-1 Details - Evaluation Matrix

Table D-1 Summary:

This table indicates the data collection methods used to assess the evaluation issues/questions for determining the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of the MTP.

The chart has three columns representing the evaluation question, the indicators, and finding number. There are 24 rows which are separated into three sections: Relevance & Program Design, Effectiveness and Efficiency.

There are four Relevance and Design evaluation questions. The first is: To what extent do the CAF’s current transition services meet the needs of transitioning members and their families? There are five indicators associated with this question. They are: Perceptions of the needs of transitioning members and families, Extent to which current transition services align with stated needs, Level of awareness of CAF transition services available among CAF members, Extent to which eligible CAF members make use of CAF transition services, and Level of satisfaction of transitioning members with CAF support provided. The first indicator correspondence with finding one. The remaining indicators correspond with findings one and three.

The second evaluation question related to Relevance and Design is: To what extent do barriers exist to accessing CAF transition services? There are two indicators: Perceptions of barriers faced by CAF members and their families when attempting to access CAF transition services, broken down by: Gender; Health status (ill & injured, medically releasing vs others); Environment (RCN, CA, RCAF) and Extent to which contextual changes in recent years have affected the needs of transitioning members and their families, or their ability to access CAF transition services. Both of the indicators correspond with finding number one.

The third evaluation question related to Relevance and Design is: To what extent do differences exist across different bases in terms of the transition services offered? There are three indicators: Extent to which the full suite of transition services are available in each base, Presence of additional transition services offered at individual bases, and Perceived differences in utilization rates of transition services at different bases. All of the indicators correlate with finding number one.

The fourth evaluation question related to Relevance and Design is: To what extent is the future Transition Program designed to affect the extent to which needs are met? There are two indicators. The first is: Extent to which the design of the Transition Program reflects identified gaps in services and addresses identified barriers to access and it correlates to finding number two. The second is: Comparison of anticipated resource levels to anticipated financial requirements and it correlates to finding number seven.

The next section of Effectiveness consists of four evaluation questions. The first is: To what extent have members and their families experienced successful transitions under the current system (as per domains of well-being)? There are three indicators associated with this questions. They are: Evidence of success of transition in terms of: Employment; Finances; Health; Life skills and preparedness; Social integration; Housing; Cultural and social environment, Self-perceived success of transition and Extent to which the CAF’s transition services contributed towards the success of transition. The first two correlate with finding number four and the last one correlates with finding number five.

The second evaluation question related to Effectiveness is: To what extent have transition outcomes differed across different sub-groups? There is one indicator: Evidence of differences in transition outcomes by: Gender; Health status (ill & injured, medically releasing vs others); Environment (RCN, CA, RCAF). It correlates with finding number four.

The third evaluation question related to Effectiveness is: To what extent is the design of the future Transition Program likely to lead to more successful transitions? There is one indicator: Estimate of the extent of change to transition success due to improved and expanded support to be provided. It correlates with finding number six.

The fourth evaluation question related to Effectiveness is: What are the possible unintended outcomes of the new Transition Program on internal and external stakeholders? There is one indicator: Stakeholder perceptions of unintended outcomes of Transition Program. It correlates with finding number two.

The next section of Efficiency consists of two evaluation questions. The first is: How cost-effective is the new Transition Program compared to the current process? There is one indicator: Comparison of benefits versus total costs between historical CAF transition services and new Transition Program (total costs include financial, time and opportunity costs). It correlates with finding number seven.

The second evaluation question related to Efficiency is: To what extent will the new TG align with other stakeholder groups? There are two indicators: Extent to which relevant stakeholder groups within CAF/DND are involved in program design and delivery and Extent to which relevant external stakeholder groups are involved in program design and delivery. Both of these indicators correlate with finding number two.

Back to Table of Contents

Footnotes

Footnote 1

DND/CAF internal records.

Return to footnote1 referrer

Footnote 2

CAF/VAC Transition Implementation Directive: CAF/VAC Transition Process Renewal - The New Transition Model. July 27, 2016.

Return to footnote2 referrer

Footnote 3

The DND/CAF Departmental Results Framework (DRF) came into effect on April 1, 2018. Military Transition is Program 3.5 under Core Responsibility 3, Defence Team, in the DRF.

Return to footnote3 referrer

Footnote 4

Internal financial records. Negative expenditure in FY 2016/17 is due to the removal of low-value accounts payable in that year.

Return to footnote4 referrer

Footnote 5

Government of Canada Infobase, https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/ems-sgd/edb-bdd/index-eng.html#start.

Return to footnote5 referrer

Footnote 6

Canada’s defence policy: Strong, Secure, Engaged. DND, 2017.

Return to footnote6 referrer

Footnote 7

The CAF directive on the SCAN Programme (DAOD 5031-4) establishes the Canadian Defence Academy (CDA) as the functional authority for this program. However, this DAOD is obsolete and should be cancelled in the near future, to be replaced by a policy suite covering all new transition processes and tools. CDA transferred all responsibility for SCAN to JPSU (now CAF TG) in 2012.

Return to footnote7 referrer

Footnote 8

CAF Transition Group Plans for IOC, DND/CAF, 2018, and internal records.

Return to footnote8 referrer

Footnote 9

Fall 2017 Your Say Survey Results: Programs Available to Ill and Injured Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Members, DND/CAF, 2018. Percentage includes both Regular Force and Reserve Force members.

Return to footnote9 referrer

Footnote 10

Ibid.

Return to footnote10 referrer

Footnote 11

Response from the SCAN feedback forms should be interpreted with caution due to low response rates. See methodology notes in Annex B.

Return to footnote11 referrer

Footnote 12

Interviewees at headquarters level included program managers and stakeholders involved in the design of the Military Transition Program. Interviewees at base/wing level included personnel involved in delivery of transition services and products.

Return to footnote12 referrer

Footnote 13

A Seamless Transition to Civilian Life for All Veterans: It’s Time for Action. Report of the Standing Committee on Veteran Affairs. May 2018, 42nd Parliament, 1st session.

Return to footnote13 referrer

Footnote 14

The Needs of Medically Releasing CAF Personnel & Their Families - A Literature Review. DND, 2015.

Return to footnote14 referrer

Footnote 15

Ibid.

Return to footnote15 referrer

Footnote 16

Mental Health of Canadian Veterans: A Family Purpose. Report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs. June 2017. 42nd Parliament, 1st session.

Return to footnote16 referrer

Footnote 17

The Needs of Medically Releasing CAF Personnel & Their Families - A Literature Review. DND, 2015.

Return to footnote17 referrer

Footnote 18

Reaching Out: Improving Service Delivery to Canadian Veterans. Report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs. December 2016. 42nd Parliament, 1st Session.

Return to footnote18 referrer

Footnote 19

The Needs of Medically Releasing CAF Personnel & Their Families - A Literature Review. DND, 2015.

Return to footnote19 referrer

Footnote 20

Mental Health of Canadian Veterans: A Family Purpose. Report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs. June 2017. 42nd Parliament, 1st session; Reaching Out: Improving Service Delivery to Canadian Veterans. Report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs. December 2016. 42nd Parliament, 1st Session; Comparative Study of Services to Veterans in Other Jurisdictions. Report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs. December 2017.

Return to footnote20 referrer

Footnote 21

Office of the Auditor General of Canada. 2012 Fall Report. Chapter 4: Transition of Ill and Injured Military Personnel to Civilian Life. 2012.

Return to footnote21 referrer

Footnote 22

Ibid.

Return to footnote22 referrer

Footnote 23

Ibid.

Return to footnote23 referrer

Footnote 24

National Defence. Evaluation of the Governance of Chief of Military Personnel. May 2016.

Return to footnote24 referrer

Footnote 25

Simplifying the service delivery model for medically releasing members of CAF.

Return to footnote25 referrer

Footnote 26

Ibid.

Return to footnote26 referrer

Footnote 27

Ibid.

Return to footnote27 referrer

Footnote 28

A Seamless Transition to Civilian Life for All Veterans: It’s Time for Action. Report of the Standing Committee on Veteran Affairs. May 2018, 42nd Parliament, 1st session.

Return to footnote28 referrer

Footnote 29

Veterans Affairs Canada. Evaluation of the Career Transition Program. September 2016.

Return to footnote29 referrer

Footnote 30

Office of the Auditor General of Canada. 2012 Fall Report. Chapter 4: Transition of Ill and Injured Military Personnel to Civilian Life. 2012.

Return to footnote30 referrer

Footnote 31

Fall 2017 Your Say Survey Results: Programs Available to Ill and Injured Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Members, DND/CAF, 2018.

Return to footnote31 referrer

Footnote 32

A Seamless Transition to Civilian Life for All Veterans: It’s Time for Action. Report of the Standing Committee on Veteran Affairs. May 2018, 42nd Parliament, 1st session.

Return to footnote32 referrer

Footnote 33

Veterans Affairs Canada. Evaluation of the Career Transition Program. September 2016.

Return to footnote33 referrer

Footnote 34

Reaching Out: Improving Service Delivery to Canadian Veterans. Report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs. December 2016. 42nd Parliament, 1st Session.

Return to footnote34 referrer

Footnote 35

Backgrounder for the Road to Civilian Life (R2CL) Program of Research, VAC, 2015.

Return to footnote35 referrer

Footnote 36

Ibid.

Return to footnote36 referrer

Footnote 37

A Seamless Transition to Civilian Life for all Veterans – It’s Time for Action, ACVA, 2018; Comparative Study of Services to Veterans in Other Jurisdictions, ACVA, 2017; Mental Health of Canadian Veterans – A Family Purpose, ACVA, 2017; Reaching out: Improving service delivery to Canadian veterans, ACVA, 2016; Report on CDS Directed Review of Care for the Ill, Injured and Transitioning, 2015; Evaluation of the Governance of the Chief of Military Personnel, DND, 2016; Determining Service Attribution for Medically Releasing Members, DND Ombudsman, 2016; Simplifying the service delivery model for medically releasing members, VAC & DND Ombudsmen, 2016; Transitioning Successfully, VAC Ombudsman, 2017.

Return to footnote37 referrer

Footnote 38

Recommendations were excluded which: 1) were directed at entities outside of DND/CAF (e.g., VAC); 2) were not within the authority of JPSU to address; or 3) were not related to transition services (e.g., those related to care of ill and injured, or of pension and benefits).

Return to footnote38 referrer

Footnote 39

CAF/VAC Transition Implementation Directive: CAF/VAC Transition Process Renewal - The New Transition Model. July 27, 2016.

Return to footnote39 referrer

Footnote 40

Mental Health of Canadian Veterans – A Family Purpose, ACVA, 2017; Comparative Study of Services to Veterans in Other Jurisdictions, ACVA, 2017; Well-being of Canadian Regular Force Veterans, Findings from LASS 2016 Survey, DND & VAC, 2017; Research on Military/Veteran Families, VAC, 2015; and Making it on Civvy Street: An Online Survey of Canadian Veterans in Transition, Cdn (Canadian) Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 2010.

Return to footnote40 referrer

Footnote 41

Making it on Civvy Street: An Online Survey of Canadian Veterans in Transition, Cdn Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 2010.

Return to footnote41 referrer

Footnote 42

Compiled from: A Seamless Transition to Civilian Life for all Veterans – It’s Time for Action, ACVA, 2018; Mental Health of Canadian Veterans – A Family Purpose, ACVA, 2017; Comparative Study of Services to Veterans in Other Jurisdictions, ACVA, 2017; Research on Military/Veteran Families, VAC, 2015; The Needs of Medically Releasing CAF Personnel and their Families – A Literature Review, DND, 2015; Transitioning Successfully, VAC Ombudsman, 2017; Making it on Civvy Street: An Online Survey of Canadian Veterans in Transition, Cdn Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 2010.

Return to footnote42 referrer

Footnote 43

A Well-Being Construct for Veterans’ Policy, Programming and Research, VAC, 2016. The seven domains of well-being are: employment or other meaningful activity; finances; health; life skills and preparedness; social integration; housing and physical environment; and cultural and social environment.

Return to footnote43 referrer

Footnote 44

Mental Health of Canadian Veterans – A Family Purpose, ACVA, 2017; Well-being of Canadian Regular Force Veterans, Findings from LASS 2016 Survey, DND & VAC, 2017.

Return to footnote44 referrer

Footnote 45

Survey on Transition to Civilian Life: Report on Regular Force Veterans, DND & VAC, 2011; The Needs of Medically Releasing CAF Personnel and their Families – A Literature Review, DND, 2015.

Return to footnote45 referrer

Footnote 46

Well-being of Canadian Regular Force Veterans, Findings from LASS 2016 Survey, DND & VAC, 2017.

Return to footnote46 referrer

Footnote 47

Transitioning from Military to Civilian Life: Examining the Final Step in a Military Career, CMJ, 2016.

Return to footnote47 referrer

Footnote 48

Well-being of Canadian Regular Force Veterans, Findings from LASS 2016 Survey, DND & VAC, 2017.

Return to footnote48 referrer

Footnote 49

A Seamless Transition to Civilian Life for all Veterans – It’s Time for Action, ACVA, 2018; Well-being of Canadian Regular Force Veterans, Findings from LASS 2016 Survey, DND & VAC, 2017; Out of uniform: psychosocial issues experienced and coping mechanisms used by Veterans during the military–civilian transition, Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health, 2017.

Return to footnote49 referrer

Footnote 50

Well-being of Canadian Regular Force Veterans, Findings from LASS 2016 Survey, DND & VAC, 2017.

Return to footnote50 referrer

Footnote 51

Research on Military/Veteran Families, VAC, 2015.

Return to footnote51 referrer

Footnote 52

Out of uniform: psychosocial issues experienced and coping mechanisms used by Veterans during the military–civilian transition, Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health, 2017.

Return to footnote52 referrer

Footnote 53

Research on Military/Veteran Families, VAC, 2015.

Return to footnote53 referrer

Footnote 54

Mental Health of Canadian Veterans – A Family Purpose, ACVA, 2017.

Return to footnote54 referrer

Footnote 55

Gender Dimension of Veteran Transition: International Best Practices and the Way Forward, Queen’s University, 2017.

Return to footnote55 referrer

Footnote 56

Research on Military/Veteran Families, VAC, 2015.

Return to footnote56 referrer

Footnote 57

Canadian Armed Forces Transition and Well-being Survey (CAFTWS): Top Line Results, DND, 2018.

Return to footnote57 referrer

Footnote 58

Gender Dimension of Veteran Transition: International Best Practices and the Way Forward, Queen’s University, 2017.

Return to footnote58 referrer

Footnote 59

Fall 2017 Your Say Survey Results: Programs Available to Ill and Injured Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Members, DND/CAF, 2018.

Return to footnote59 referrer

Footnote 60

Canadian Armed Forces Transition and Well-being Survey (CAFTWS): Top Line Results, DND, 2018.

Return to footnote60 referrer

Footnote 61

Internal financial records.

Return to footnote61 referrer

Footnote 62

Internal financial and HR records. Includes Regular Force and Reserve Force members.

Return to footnote62 referrer

Footnote 63

A Seamless Transition to Civilian Life for All Veterans: It’s Time for Action. Report of the Standing Committee on Veteran Affairs. May 2018, 42nd Parliament, 1st session; National Defence. Evaluation of the Governance of Chief of Military Personnel. May 2016.

Return to footnote63 referrer

Footnote 64

DND Departmental Plan 2017/18; DND Departmental Results Report 2017/18.

Return to footnote64 referrer

Footnote 65

CAF Transition Group Plans for IOC, DND/CAF, 2018.

Return to footnote65 referrer

Footnote 66

Based on a model created from historic data on recruitment, attrition and force size (Historical PARRA Report, March 31, 2005 – March 31, 2018, DND/CAF, 2018), assuming future Regular Force strength in line with targets set out in SSE and the 2018 Departmental Results Report.

Return to footnote66 referrer

Footnote 67

Defence Team Establishment Plan.

Return to footnote67 referrer

Footnote 68

House of Commons Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, 2018.

Return to footnote68 referrer

Footnote 69

Chi-square test, α = 0.05.

Return to footnote69 referrer

Page details

Date modified:: 2020-03-04

Language selection

Search

Evaluation of the Military Transition Program

Table of Contents

Alternate Formats

Assistant Deputy Minister (Review Services)

Overall Assessment

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Context for the Evaluation

1.2 Program Profile

1.2.1 Program Description

ADM(RS) Recommendation

ADM(RS) Recommendation

ADM(RS) Recommendation

ADM(RS) Recommendation

ADM(RS) Recommendation

ADM (RS) Recommendation

ADM (RS) Recommendation

ADM (RS) Recommendation

ADM (RS) Recommendation

ADM (RS) Recommendation

Annex C—Logic Model

Page details