Annual report on the administration of the Access to Information Act 2013-2014
1.0 Introduction
Section 72 of the Access to Information Act requires the head of every federal government institution to submit an annual report to Parliament on the administration of the Act following the close of each fiscal year. This report describes how Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) fulfilled its Access to Information Act responsibilities during fiscal year 2013–2014.
2.0 Departmental name change
On July 15, 2013, the Honourable Jason Kenney was sworn in as Minister of Employment and Social Development. Concurrently, the name of the Department was changed to Employment and Social Development Canada.
Employment and social development represent two major priorities for the Department, in keeping with our mission to build a stronger and more competitive Canada, to support Canadians in making choices that help them live productive and rewarding lives, and to improve Canadians’ quality of life.
2.1 About Employment and Social Development Canada
ESDC’s mission is to build a stronger and more competitive Canada, to support Canadians in making choices that help them live productive and rewarding lives and to improve Canadians’ quality of life.
To do this, we:
- develop policies that make Canada a society in which all can use their talents, skills and resources to participate in learning, work and their community;
- create programs and support initiatives that help Canadians move through life’s transitions—from families with children to seniors, from school to work, from one job to another, from unemployment to employment, from the workforce to retirement;
- create better outcomes for Canadians through service excellence with Service Canada and other partners; and
- engage our employees, establish a healthy work environment, nurture a culture of teamwork and build our leadership capacity.
3.0 About the Access to Information Act
The Access to Information Act gives individuals and organizations present in Canada the right to access information held in federal government records, subject to a few limited and specific exceptions and exclusions
4.0 Access to information at ESDC
In processing requests for information under the Access to Information Act, ESDC must strike a balance when weighing the public’s right to know with the institution’s legitimate obligation to withhold specific information in an effort to protect the larger interests of society. The Department contains a wealth of personal information pertaining to individuals in our records, and unless very specific conditions set out in the Act allow for its release, such information must be severed from disclosure. ESDC subjects all requested records to a thorough review to determine if any information should be withheld.
4.1 Access to information delegations
Section 73 of the Access to Information Act empowers the head of the institution to delegate any of the powers, duties or functions assigned to him or her by the Act to employees of the institution.
In February 2009, the Honourable Diane Finley, the then Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development, approved a Delegation Order for the Access to Information Act, delegating the authority for access to information to key positions within the senior management team, as well as to Departmental officials who have the knowledge and expertise to exercise the powers, duties or functions of the Minister under the legislation.
The Delegation Order is attached as Annex A.
4.2 Chief Privacy Officer
The Chief Privacy Officer is the Department’s functional authority on all privacy matters, which includes the provision of authoritative advice and functional direction to all Departmental branches and regions. The Chief Privacy Officer is responsible for the proactive management of privacy issues in the Department and the establishment of comprehensive privacy management frameworks, programs, review processes, and risk-based approaches to privacy management.
In addition to establishing Departmental privacy directives, standards, guidelines, and processes, the Chief Privacy Officer is accountable for the implementation of the Department’s privacy management program, including the coordination and management of privacy activities, which includes oversight of the Department’s privacy governance structure with clear accountabilities and defined objectives that are aligned with Departmental and government-wide policies, priorities and plans. The Department’s privacy program is monitored, assessed and reported-on to measure performance against expected results.
4.3 Transition in Access and Privacy roles and responsibilities
Effective October 1, 2013, the Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) and Privacy Renewal Divisions were re-aligned to address the evolution of the privacy management function within the Department. The objectives of the re-alignment include:
- Support the continued modernization of the Department’s privacy function and the implementation of the Privacy Renewal Action Plan;
- Clarify the mandates, roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities of the Divisions to better
- Respond to the evolving needs of the Department;
- Better align resources to Departmental priorities; and
- Structure the organization to optimize performance and results.
The Divisions are re-aligned as follows.
5.0 ESDC’s structure, functions, and responsibilities
5.1 Privacy management division
The Privacy Management Division is the Departmental focal-point for the management of privacy policy and the implementation of the Department’s Privacy Management Framework. Under the authority and direction of the Chief Privacy Officer, the Privacy Management Division supports the horizontal coordination and implementation of Departmental strategic plans and priorities as it relates to the protection of privacy, including the Department’s multi-year Privacy Management Action Plan. The Division also manages the Department’s privacy risk management function, including the Privacy Impact Assessment process and the development of Information Sharing Agreements involving personal information.
The Privacy management division includes two units:
- The Privacy compliance and review unit provides advice, guidance, and privacy-related services to Departmental officials on the application of relevant privacy legislation, policies, directives and guidance. This includes the management of the Department’s Personal Information Banks in InfoSource, the review of privacy notice statements, contracts, and other forms and instruments for privacy compliance, and the provision of advice and guidance for the development of Information Sharing Agreements. The Unit is also tasked with the day-to-day issues management related to the protection of personal information under the custody and control of the Department; and
- The Policy, planning, and coordination unit is responsible for the development and implementation of the Department’s privacy policy suite, strategic support services to the Chief Privacy Officer and the Privacy and Information Security Committee, and strategic planning and reporting functions. The Unit is also responsible for the design and implementation of the Department’s Privacy Program, the privacy risk management process, the review and assessment of strategic policy and program priorities, and research and evaluation of emerging trends. The Unit also supports the management and implementation of horizontal issues and working groups.
5.2 Access to Information and Privacy Operations Division
The Access to Information and Privacy Operations Division carries out the Department’s legislated requirements under the Privacy Act and the Access to Information Act. The Division leads the processing of all requests under the Access to Information Act, and coordinates the processing of Privacy Act requests, many of which are handled at the regional level. This work involves responding to requests from the public and delivering training and awareness programs to employees with respect to administration of the two Acts.
The Division is responsible for providing guidance to the regions with respect to the operational and reporting components of the Access to Information and Privacy function. As part of the delegated authority within this unit, the Division responds to legal instruments in which the Department is asked to share personal information, (i.e., subpoenas, court orders, search warrants), liaises with the Office of the Information Commissioner and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner regarding complaints received by the Department, and serves as the Departmental point of contact with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner on privacy breaches. The Division is also responsible for managing the disclosure of information to third parties via public interest disclosures.
The ATIP Operations Division includes two units:
- The ATIP processing unit performs a line-by-line review of records requested under the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. Reports are provided for information purposes on a weekly basis to the Deputy Ministers’ Offices and the Ministers’ Offices, both on new Access to Information requests and upcoming releases under the Access to Information Act.
- The Incident management and legislative disclosures unit helps support consistent treatment of personal information entrusted to the Department, and leads the Departmental response to all legal instruments received. The Unit also manages complaints to the OPC by Departmental clients and interacts with the OPC on privacy breaches, working in partnership with the Departmental Security Office.
5.3 Branch and regional access to information activities
While the ATIP Operations Director, with support from the Division’s ATIP Operations officers, has overall authority for the administration of the Access to Information Act, branches and regions also play a key role.
The Department has a network of regional, local and branch coordinators to undertake many of its key privacy responsibilities. The majority of the thousands of Privacy Act requests that ESDC receives in a typical year are processed by employees within ESDC’s regional offices. Regional privacy activities have been centralized under Regional Privacy Centres of Specialization to maintain capacity and expertise. ESDC’s Regional Privacy Centres of Specialization officers have delegated authority to process formal privacy requests under the Privacy Act and also process informal requests received by the Department. Under the functional direction of the Departmental Chief Privacy Officer, regional offices also provide privacy advice and guidance to regional management and members of the public.
5.4 ESDC’s commitment to respect timeframes
Except for specific circumstances in which an extension can be claimed, the Access to Information Act provides 30 calendar days for responding to requests. Given these strict timeframes and the Department’s commitment to respect the spirit and the letter of the legislation, the following processes and responsibilities are established at ESDC:
- Retrieval of relevant records and formulation of recommendations: Targeted branches and regions (offices of primary interest) are allotted eight working days to retrieve complete and accurate records in response to requests and provide them, along with recommendations, to the ATIP Operations Division.
- Line-by-line review of the responsive records: The ATIP Processing Unit is provided with eight working days to do a thorough line-by-line review of the records and to invoke the limited and specific exemption and exclusion provisions that are applicable.
- Seen and noted signatures, and copies for information: If requested, the Executive Head of the targeted branch or region is provided a copy of the release package and is given four working days to provide his or her signature indicating that he or she is aware that the records are being released (i.e. for seen and noted purposes). At the same time that the records are provided to the office of primary interest, copies of the package are provided to Departmental communications officials. Employees from the Deputy Ministers’ Offices and the Ministers’ Offices are also given a copy of the package for information purposes, when requested. Some files may require the preparation of media lines. The preparation of communications products is undertaken by communications and branch officials and does not impact the timely processing of access to information requests.
The three steps described account for a total of 20 working days. ESDC’s ATIP Operations Division has a long-standing history of keeping its partners informed throughout the process when responding to access to information requests. This collaborative approach supports a no-surprise environment for stakeholders within ESDC, enabling officials in the ATIP Operations Division to appropriately administer the legislation with few delays.
6.0 Activities and accomplishments in 2013–2014
6.1 Challenges
This year was marked by the retirement of senior employees in the ATIP Processing Unit which greatly impacted the workforce capacity, creating a need for expertise within the office. To maintain an effective handling of requests within the existing resources, the ATIP Operations Division recognized the importance of seeking new and innovative ways to process requests within the legislated timeframe.
6.2 Business process redesign
Consequently, in May 2013, ESDC launched a Business Process Redesign (BPR) of the Access to Information (ATI) process in the Department, to oversee and identify more efficient and innovative ways of dealing with the increasing volume and complexity of ATI requests. The initiative’s goal was also to improve efficiencies in the management and processing of ATI requests across ESDC (ESD, Service Canada and the Labour Program); simplify and streamline work requirements for ATIP Operations Divisional staff and partners (Branches and Regions); better fulfill our obligations under the Access to Information Act; and, reduce the paper burden.
A cross functional workgroup was created to examine the current process, using the BPR methodology. Some quick modifications to the process were quickly implemented and other innovative medium-term solutions are being analyzed, to determine the way forward in the fourth and final phase of implementation.
6.3 Stewardship of information and effective workplace behaviours tool
ESDC has developed a mandatory online training course designed to provide employees with the knowledge of how to protect and manage the resources, including personal information, entrusted to them as employees of ESDC. The Stewardship of Information and Effective Workplace Behaviours training tool, produced by the Service Canada College of ESDC, was created by pedagogical experts in collaboration with subject matter experts, including from the ATIP Operations Division. The module covers six disciplines related to the stewardship of information: security, information technology (IT) security, information management, values and ethics/code of conduct, privacy, and access to information.
Launched in 2013-2014, this course supports the Department’s commitment to enhancing the responsible use and care of Departmental and personal information and is required to be completed by all employees across the Department. To date, more than 44 % of employees have completed the training. This module will be required to be retaken every two years. New employees joining the Department are also required to complete this course. This is the first training of its kind available at ESDC and will support a culture of access to information awareness within the Department.
6.4 Access to Information and Privacy training and awareness activities
In 2013–2014, the ATIP Operations Division provided 14 in-person training sessions on access to information and privacy issues to 109 employees across the Department. In response to recurring questions from program experts regarding the scoping of records and on the formulation of recommendations regarding the Access to Information Act’s exemption and exclusion provisions, the ATIP Operations Division updated and shared its guidance on these topics with program areas. Recognizing that not all employees are tasked with requests on a regular basis, the guidance is brief and provides key pointers to assist those responsible for gathering records to fulfill their responsibilities.
In addition to the sessions that were offered by the ATIP Operations Division, the regional officials responsible for privacy in the regions also provided information sessions to their colleagues. Regional officials provided 20 sessions to 677 employees during 2013–2014.
Overall, provision of in-person access to information training has been replaced by the Departmental transition to an online, self-directed integrated learning model, not only for access to information but also for privacy, security, IT security, information management and values and ethics/code of conduct.
7.0 Performance reporting for 2013–2014
7.1 Requests for Information under the Access to Information Act
The following is a summary of the information contained in the Statistical Report on the Access to Information Act for 2013–2014, which is attached as Annex B.
| 2011 - 2012 | 2012 - 2013 | 2013 - 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formal request received under the Access to Information Act. | 579 | 746 | 861 |
| Requests completed/processed during the year | 531 | 630 | 932 |
| Number of pages processed | 120,109 | 112,087 | 101,577 |
| Request completed within: | |||
| 30 calendar days | 276 | 314 | 388 |
| 31-60 calendar days | 171 | 195 | 273 |
| 61 or more calendar days | 82 | 121 | 212 |
| Proportion of requests that were responded to within legislated timeframes according to Information Commissioner's standards |
97% | 92% | 88% |
| Complaints to the Information Commissioner of Canada | 24 | 20 | 38 |
7.2 Total of access to information requests completed
The Department received 861 requests during the reporting period and completed 932 requests. Both figures are higher in comparison to previous years.
Figure 1 - Requests for Information under the Access to Information Act
Text description - Requests for Information under the Access to Information Act
The figure is a chart showing numbers of requests for records under the Access to Information Act received and completed by ESDC in each of the past three fiscal years (2011-2012 to 2013-2014).
There are two categories: “Formal requests received under the Access to Information Act” and “Formal requests completed under the Access to Information Act.”
| Received | Completed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2011-2012 | 579 | 531 |
| 2012-2013 | 746 | 630 |
| 2013-2014 | 861 | 932 |
7.3 Sources of requests
The most common source of requests was the general public (36%), followed by businesses (23%), organizations (22%), and the media (18%). Academics accounted for 1% of the requests submitted to ESDC in 2013–2014.
Figure 2 - Sources of requests under the Access to Information Act
Text description - Requests for Information under the Access to Information Act
The figure is a chart showing sources of requests as a proportion of total requests under the Access to Information Act during the 2013-2014 fiscal year.
There are five categories: “General public”, “Businesses”, “Media”, “Organizations” and “Academics”.
| Business | 23% |
|---|---|
| Academics | 1% |
| General public | 36% |
| Medias | 18% |
| Organization | 22% |
Typical requests included those for statistics on the Department’s various programs:
- briefing notes;
- research and studies on issues of interest to the ESDC portfolio;
- requests from employers or their representative for records regarding their own applications under the Temporary Foreign Worker Program;
- requests for information on contracts, including deliverables;
- requests for documents regarding issues that were reported in the news media.
7.4 Processing times
Of the requests in which records were provided to the applicant, 26% were disclosed in full, while in 52% of cases, at least some of the information was withheld in accordance with the exemption and exclusion provisions permitted under the Access to Information Act. Nearly half of requests received (48%) were processed within 30 days, and 77% were processed within the first 60 days.
Figure 3 - Requests under the Access to Information Act by calendar days taken to complete
Text description - Requests under the Access to Information Act by calendar days taken to complete
The figure is a chart showing numbers of requests completed in each for the past three fiscal years (2011-2012 to 2013-2014), categorized based on the number of days taken to complete the requests.
There are three categories: “30 calendar days”, “31-60 calendar days” and “61 or more calendar days”.
| 30 calendar days | 31-60 calendar days | 61 or more calendar days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-2012 | 53% | 33% | 15% |
| 2012-2013 | 50% | 31% | 19% |
| 2013-2014 | 48% | 29% | 23% |
7.5 Exemptions and exclusions
Exemptions and exclusions are the only grounds to withhold information found in records that are requested under the Access to Information Act. Their application is limited and specific, as stipulated in the Act. On the requests where an exemption was invoked, the most frequently applied provision was subsection 19(1), which seeks to protect personal information pertaining to individuals other than the requester.
Other frequently used exemptions include section 21, which is used to protect the integrity of the Government’s decision-making process including advice, recommendations, deliberations, plans and positions relating to ongoing negotiations; section 20 to protect third-party confidential information held in government records; subsection 24(1), which is used to withhold information for which disclosure is prohibited by other federal laws, for example, the Income Tax Act; section 16, which permits institutions to withhold information that would be injurious to lawful investigations or information that would enable the commission of an offence; section 23, which is the exemption provision used to withhold information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege; and section 14, which serves to withhold information that would be injurious to federal-provincial relations/negotiation if released. Other exemptions were invoked in 29 cases or less.
The Act indicates that certain types of materials are excluded from its application, specifically, records that are already available to the public (section 68) and Cabinet Confidences (section 69). A total of 64 sections 69 exclusions were invoked on 42 requests during the reporting period.
The Department provided records in paper format in 564 cases and electronically (on CD) for 152 requests. When requests contain a large number of pages for release, records are usually provided electronically.
7.6 Pages processed
A total of 101,577 pages were reviewed (processed) by staff during the reporting period, with 87,116 pages disclosed (in full or in part) to requesters. The remaining 14,461 pages were either withheld pursuant to one or more of the Act’s exemption or exclusion provisions, or were not disclosed because the applicant had abandoned the request.
While most requests (80%) corresponded to a review of 500 pages or less, 24 requests (3%) required a review of more than 1,000 pages each. These 24 requests resulted in the release of 36,541 pages, or 42% of the pages that were disclosed during the reporting period.
7.7 Other complexities
In addition to information regarding the number of pages processed, the statistical report contains information regarding “Other Complexities,” namely the number of requests where consultations are required, where fees were assessed, where legal advice was sought or “Other.” The category “Other,” according to the Treasury Board Secretariat, “comprises high profile subject matter, requests where records are in a region or other country, and requests where the records are in a language other than English or French.”
Consultations were required on 93 requests. Legal advice was sought on the processing of 42 of the requests that were completed in 2013–2014. Fees were assessed on 58 requests. Finally, 194 requests fell into the category “Other,” corresponding to the requests in which regional records were sought.
7.8 Performance
The Department was unable to meet its deadline for 87 requests, representing 9% of the requests that were processed. The most common reason for missing the deadline was workload (61%), with external and internal consultations accounting for the remaining requests.
Throughout the year, as an increasing number of requests required lengthy consultations, the ATIP Operations Division continued its practice of contacting requesters to determine whether they were willing to exclude records that require these types of consultations, thereby reducing the time taken to process the requests. This course of action was beneficial to the applicant, to the Department and to other institutions responsible for responding to consultations. The Department was late by 30 days or less in 45 of the 87 cases. The remaining 42 requests were late by 30 to 365 days.
7.9 Extensions
An extension beyond the initial 30 days is permitted if responding to the request would require a search through a large volume of records and responding within the first 30 days would unreasonably interfere with operations, or if external consultations (with another institution, organization or business) are required. In 2013–2014, the Department claimed an extension on 319 requests, with the majority of extensions due to volume.
7.10 Translation of records
No requests for translation were received during the 2013–2014 fiscal year.
7.11 Fees
The Department collected $3,793 in fees, as permitted by the Act and its Regulations, and waived $17,953, in fees. Most of the waived fees correspond to reproduction fees, which are no longer chargeable to the client given the increased use of electronic media for release of records. When requesters are provided with the records on CD, reproduction fees are waived. When a release package comprises 125 pages or less, reproduction fees are not charged, in accordance with guidance from the Treasury Board Secretariat.
7.12 Consultations received by ESDC
ESDC responded to 188 consultations, corresponding to a review of 12,828 pages, from other federal institutions. In 86% of the consultations, the Department was able to respond within 30 days, with most consultations receiving a response in 15 days or less. Almost 65% of these consultations resulted in a recommendation to disclose the records entirely, with the Department counselling the consulting institution to disclose in part in 30% of the time. In the remaining cases, the consulting institution was either asked to consult with another institution, to exempt the records in their entirety or take a different course of action (“Other”).
Consultations on Cabinet Confidences were sent to the Privy Council Office for 14 of the requests that were closed in 2013–2014, and ESDC’s Legal Services Unit on nine requests, in accordance with the new procedures which came into force in July of 2013. This revised TBS issued process requires that consultations on Cabinet confidences be sent to Legal Services Unit rather than the Privy Council Office.
7.13 Financial considerations
The Department spent $640,000 on salaries associated with administering the Access to Information Act, with non-salary costs amounting to $7,500.
Approximately 8 dedicated resources at National Headquarters were involved in administering the Access to Information Act during 2013–2014.
8.0 Request summaries posted to ESDC website
Since January 2012, ESDC has been posting the summaries of its completed Access to Information Act requests on the Departmental website on a monthly basis, in accordance with the Treasury Board Secretariat’s directives. In 2013–2014, 204 release packages were provided informally to requesters upon request.
9.0 Complaints and investigations
The Department was notified of 38 complaints received by the Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) during 2013–2014. Fifteen complaints were lodged as a result of a fee assessment that was prepared to respond to the requests, thirteen of which originated from a single applicant. Ten complaints related to the time required by ESDC to process the requests. Seven complainants believed that not all records were provided in response to their request. Five requesters alleged that ESDC improperly invoked the Act’s exemption provisions. One complaint fell into the category of miscellaneous.
ESDC received findings on ten complaints in 2013–2014. The OIC ruled that six of the complaints were well-founded, but resolved. An additional complaint was resolved prior to the OIC determining whether the complaint had merits. The OIC determined that three of the complaints were not well founded.
10.0 Annex A: Delegation order
Department of Human Resources and Skills Development
Delegation order
Access to information act
I, Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development, pursuant to Section 73 of the Access to Information Act, hereby designate the officer or employee of the Department of Human Resources and Skills Development whose position or title is set out in the attached Schedule, or the officers or employees occupying, on an acting basis or otherwise, those positions, to exercise the powers, duties, or functions of the head of the institution under the Act that are set in the Schedule in relation to that officer or employee.
This delegation order supersedes any previous order executed pursuant to section 73 of the Act.
Text description Signature of the Honourable Diane Finley, signed 28th of February 2008
Signature of the Honourable Diane Finley, signed February 28 2008.
The Honourable Diane Finley
Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development
Access to Information Act – Delegation of authority
| Description | Section | Deputy Minister HRSD | Deputy Minister Labour | Deputy Head Service Canada | ADMs of PPCA and Labour | Corporate Secretary HRSD | Director ATIP Operations | Manager ATIP Operations | ATIP Officers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Responsibility of government institutions | 4(2.1) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Notice where access requested | 7(a) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Giving access to record | 7(b) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Transfer of request to another government inst. | 8(1) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Extension of time limits | 9 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Payment of additional fees | 11(2) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Payment of fees for EDP record | 11(3) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Deposit | 11(4) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Notice of fee payment | 11(5) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Waiver of refund of fees | 11(6) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Language of access | 12(2)(b) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Access to alternate format | 12(3)(b) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Refuse access - Obtained in confidence | 13 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Federal-provincial affairs | 14 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - International affairs and defence | 15 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Law enforcement, investigations | 16 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act | 16.5 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Safety of individuals | 17 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Economic Interests of Canada | 18 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Economic interest of the Canada Post Corporation, Export Development Canada, the Public Sector Pension Investment Board and VIA Rail Canada Inc. | 18.1 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Personal information | 19 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Third party information | 20 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Operations of Government | 21 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Testing procedures, tests, audits | 22 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Audit working papers and draft audit reports | 22.1 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Solicitor-client privilege | 23 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Refuse access - Statutory prohibitions | 24 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Severability | 25 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Information to be published | 26 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Third party notification | 27(1) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Third party notification - Extension of time limit | 27(4) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Third party notification - Notice of decision | 28(1)(b) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Third party notification - Representations in writing | 28(2) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Third party notification - Disclosure of record | 28(4) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Where the Information Commissioner recommends disclosure | 29(1) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Advising Information Commissioner of third party involvement | 33 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Right to make representations | 35(2)(b) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Access to be given to complainant | 37(4) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Notice to third party (application to Federal Court) | 43(1) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Notice to applicant (application to Federal Court by third party) | 44(2) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Special rules for hearings | 52(2)(b) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Ex parte representations (Federal Court) |
52(3) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Facilities for inspection of manuals | 71(1) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Annual report to Parliament | 72 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Regulations | |||||||||
| Transfer of request | 6(1) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Search and preparation of fees | 7(2) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Production and programming fees | 7(3) | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Providing access to records | 8 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Limitations in respect of format | 8.1 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
11.0 Annex B: Statistical report on the access to information
Name of institution: Employment and Social Development Canada
Reporting period: 2013/04/01 to 2014/03/31
Part 1 - Request under the Access to Information Act
| Number of requests | |
|---|---|
| Received during reporting period | 861 |
| Outstanding from previous period | 228 |
| Total | 1,089 |
| Closed during reporting period | 932 |
| Carried over to next reporting period | 157 |
| Source | Number of requests |
|---|---|
| Media | 154 |
| Academia | 5 |
| Business (Private sector) | 203 |
| Organization | 187 |
| Public | 312 |
| Total | 861 |
Part 2 - Requests closed during the reporting period
| Disposition of requests |
Completion time | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 to 15 days | 16 to 30 days | 31 to 60 days | 61 to 120 days | 121 to 180 days | 181 to 365 days | More than 365 days | Total | |
| All disclosed | 26 | 124 | 81 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 243 |
| Disclosed in part | 2 | 130 | 154 | 122 | 41 | 20 | 4 | 473 |
| All exempted | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| No records exist | 3 | 95 | 31 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 132 |
| Request transferred | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Request abandoned | 20 | 37 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 66 |
| Treated informally | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 59 | 388 | 273 | 138 | 43 | 23 | 8 | 932 |
| Section | Number of requests |
|---|---|
| 13(1)(a) | 0 |
| 13(1)(b) | 0 |
| 13(1)(c) | 4 |
| 13(1)(e) | 0 |
| 14(a) | 0 |
| 14(b) | 44 |
| 15(a)-IA | 1 |
| 15(1)-Def | 16 |
| 15(1)-S.A | 0 |
| 16(1)(a)(i) | 1 |
| 16(1)(a)(ii) | 0 |
| 16(1)(a)(iii) | 0 |
| 16(1)(b) | 3 |
| 16(1)(c) | 13 |
| 16(1)(d) | 1 |
| 16(2)(a) | 130 |
| 16(2)(b) | 0 |
| 16(2)(c) | 7 |
| 16(3) | 0 |
| 16(1)(1)(a) | 0 |
| 16(1)(1)(b) | 0 |
| 16(1)(1)(c) | 0 |
| 16(1)(1)(d) | 0 |
| 16.2(1) | 0 |
| 16.4(1)(a) | 0 |
| 16.4(1)(b) | 0 |
| 16.5 | 0 |
| 17 | 2 |
| 18(a) | 0 |
| 18(b) | 1 |
| 18(c) | 0 |
| 18(d) | 1 |
| 18.1(1)(a) | 0 |
| 18.1(1)(b) | 0 |
| 18.1(1)(c) | 0 |
| 18.1(1)(d) | 0 |
| 19(1) | 368 |
| 20(1)(a) | 1 |
| 20(1)(b) | 109 |
| 20(1)(b.1) | 0 |
| 20(1)(c) | 103 |
| 20(1)(d) | 26 |
| 20.1 | 0 |
| 20.2 | 0 |
| 20.4 | 0 |
| 21(1)(a) | 76 |
| 21(1)(b) | 125 |
| 21(1)(c) | 14 |
| 21(1)(d) | 10 |
| 22 | 6 |
| 22.1(1) | 0 |
| 23 | 63 |
| 24(1) | 76 |
| 26 | 1 |
| Section | Number of requests |
|---|---|
| 68(a) | 0 |
| 68(b) | 0 |
| 68(c) | 0 |
| 68.1 | 0 |
| 68(2)(a) | 0 |
| 68.2(b) | 0 |
| 68(1)(a) | 4 |
| 68(1)(b) | 0 |
| 68(1)(c) | 1 |
| 68(1)(d) | 1 |
| 68(1)(e) | 11 |
| 69(1)(f) | 3 |
| 69(1)(g)re(a) | 5 |
| 69(1)(g)re(b) | 0 |
| 69(1)(g)re(c) | 2 |
| 69(1)(g)re(d) | 1 |
| 69(1)(g)re(e) | 9 |
| 69(1)(g)re(f) | 5 |
| 69.1(1) | 0 |
| Disposition | Paper | Electronic | Other formats |
|---|---|---|---|
| All disclosed | 221 | 22 | 0 |
| Disclosed in part | 343 | 130 | 0 |
| Total | 564 | 152 | 0 |
2.5 Complexity
| Disposition of requests | Number of pages processed | Number of pages disclosed | Number of requests |
|---|---|---|---|
| All disclosed | 10,444 | 10,044 | 243 |
| Disclosed in part | 88,854 | 77,072 | 473 |
| All exempted | 199 | 0 | 7 |
| All excluded | 262 | 0 | 2 |
| Request abandoned | 1,818 | 0 | 66 |
| Disposition | Less than 100 pages processed |
101-500 pages processed |
501-1,000 pages processed |
1,001-5,000 pages processed |
More than 5,000 pages processed |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of requests |
Pages disclosed | Number of requests |
Pages disclosed | Number of requests |
Pages disclosed | Number of requests |
Pages disclosed | Number of requests |
Pages disclosed | |
| All disclosed | 222 | 3,212 | 18 | 4,450 | 2 | 1,124 | 1 | 1,258 | 0 | 0 |
| Disclosed in part | 324 | 9,608 | 104 | 20,556 | 22 | 11,625 | 23 | 35,283 | 0 | 0 |
| All exempted | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| All excluded | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Abandoned | 63 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 616 | 12,820 | 126 | 25,006 | 25 | 12,749 | 24 | 36,541 | 0 | 0 |
| Disposition | Consultation required | Assessment of fees | Legal advice sought | Other | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All disclosed | 8 | 4 | 5 | 39 | 56 |
| Disclosed in part | 79 | 13 | 33 | 132 | 257 |
| All exempted | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| All excluded | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Abandoned | 3 | 41 | 2 | 21 | 67 |
| Total | 93 | 58 | 42 | 194 | 387 |
2.6 Deemed refusals
| Number of requests closed past the statutory deadline | Principal reason | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workload | External consultation | Internal consultation | Other | |
| 87 | 53 | 18 | 9 | 7 |
| Number of days past deadline | Number of requests past deadline where no extension was taken | Number of requests past deadline where an extension was taken | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 to 15 days | 11 | 22 | 33 |
| 16 to 30 days | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| 31 to 60 days | 1 | 13 | 14 |
| 61 to 120 days | 1 | 13 | 14 |
| 121 to 180 days | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 181 to 365 days | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| More than 365 days | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Total | 16 | 71 | 87 |
| Translation requests | Paper | Electronic | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| From English to French | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| From French to English | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Part 3 - Extensions
| Disposition of requests where an extension was taken | 9(1)(a) Interference with operations |
9(1)(b) Consultation |
9(1)(c) Third party notice | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Section 69 | Other | |||
| All disclosed | 10 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
| Disclosed in part | 200 | 12 | 67 | 2 |
| All exempted | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| All excluded | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| No records exist | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Request abandoned | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Total | 219 | 14 | 82 | 4 |
| Length of extensions | 9(1)(a) Interference with operations |
9(1)(b) Consultation |
9(1)(c)Third party notice | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Section 69 | Other | |||
| 30 days or less | 98 | 1 | 16 | 0 |
| 31 to 60 days | 43 | 1 | 34 | 4 |
| 61 to 120 days | 77 | 12 | 28 | 0 |
| 121 to 180 days | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| 181 to 365 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 219 | 14 | 82 | 4 |
| Fee Type | Fee collected | Fee waived or refunded | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of requests | Amount | Number of requests | Amount | |
| Application | 750 | $3,750 | 106 | $530 |
| Search | 3 | $43 | 0 | $0 |
| Production | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| Programming | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| Preparation | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| Alternate format | 0 | $0 | 0 | $0 |
| Reproduction | 0 | $0 | 716 | $17,423 |
| Total | 753 | $3,793 | 822 | $17,953 |
Part 5 - Consultations received from other institutions and organizations
| Consultations | Other government institutions | Number of pages to review | Other organizations | Number of pages to review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Received during the reporting period | 185 | 12,672 | 11 | 268 |
| Outstanding from the previous reporting period | 10 | 304 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 195 | 12,976 | 11 | 268 |
| Closed during the reporting period | 188 | 12,828 | 11 | 268 |
| Pending at the end of the reporting period | 7 | 148 | 0 | 0 |
| Recommendation | Number of days required to complete consultation requests | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 to 15 days | 16 to 30 days | 31 to 60 days | 61 to 120 days | 121 to 180 days | 181 to 365 days | More than 365 days | Total | |
| Disclose entirely | 65 | 40 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 117 |
| Disclose in part | 30 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 57 |
| Exempt entirely | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Exclude entirely | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Consult other institution | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Total | 100 | 61 | 15 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 188 |
| Recommendation | Number of days required to complete consultation requests | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 to 15 days | 16 to 30 days | 31 to 60 days | 61 to 120 days | 121 to 180 days | 181 to 365 days | More than 365 days | Total | |
| Disclose entirely | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Disclose in part | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Exempt entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Exclude entirely | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Consult other institution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
Part 6 - Completion time of consultations on Cabinet confidence
| Number of days | Number of responses received | Number of responses received past deadline |
|---|---|---|
| 1 to 15 | 1 | 0 |
| 16 to 30 | 6 | 0 |
| 31 to 60 | 10 | 0 |
| 61 to 120 | 2 | 2 |
| 121 to 180 | 0 | 0 |
| 181 to 365 | 3 | 3 |
| More than 365 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | 23 | 6 |
Part 7 - Resources related to the Access to Information Act
| Expenditures | Amount |
|---|---|
| Salaries | $640,000 |
| Overtime | $0 |
| Goods and Services | $7,500 |
|
|
| Total | $647,500 |
| Resources | Dedicated full-time to ATI activities | Dedicated part-time to ATI activities | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full-time employees | 0.00 | 8.40 | 8.40 |
| Part-time and casual employees | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Regional staff | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Consultants and agency personnel | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Students | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total | 0.00 | 8.40 | 8.40 |
Additional reporting requirements - Access to Information Act
Appendix A
| Institution | Number of informal releases of previously released ATI packages |
|---|---|
| Employment and Social Development Canada | 204 |
| Institution | Number of completed PIAs |
|---|---|
| Employment and Social Development Canada | 10 |
| Number of days | Less than 100 pages processed | 101 to 500 pages processed | 501 to 1,000 pages processed |
1,001 to 5,000 pages processed |
More than 5,000 pages processed |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | |
| 1 to 15 | 1 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 to 30 | 3 | 98 | 2 | 431 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 to 60 | 2 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 491 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 61 to 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 121 to 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 181 to 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| More than 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 234 | 2 | 431 | 1 | 491 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of days | Less than 100 pages processed | 101 to 500 pages processed | 501 to 1,000 pages processed |
1,001 to 5,000 pages processed |
More than 5,000 pages processed |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | |
| 1 to 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 to 30 | 1 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 to 60 | 6 | 167 | 1 | 146 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 61 to 120 | 1 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3,823 | 0 | 0 |
| 121 to 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 181 to 365 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| More than 365 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 228 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 250 | 5 | 450 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3,823 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of days | Less than 100 pages processed | 101 to 500 pages processed | 501 to 1,000 pages processed |
1,001 to 5,000 pages processed |
More than 5,000 pages processed |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | |
| 1 to 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 to 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 to 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 61 to 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 121 to 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 181 to 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| More than 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of days | Less than 100 pages processed | 101 to 500 pages processed | 501 to 1,000 pages processed |
1,001 to 5,000 pages processed |
More than 5,000 pages processed |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | Number of requests | Pages disclosed | |
| 1 to 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 to 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 to 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 61 to 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 121 to 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 181 to 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| More than 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The tables above in Appendix A of the Statistical Report include reporting data under both the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act pursuant to 2013-2014 Treasury Board Secretariat reporting requirements.