Annual report on the administration of the Access to Information Act 2013-2014

1.0 Introduction

Section 72 of the Access to Information Act requires the head of every federal government institution to submit an annual report to Parliament on the administration of the Act following the close of each fiscal year. This report describes how Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) fulfilled its Access to Information Act responsibilities during fiscal year 2013–2014.

2.0 Departmental name change

On July 15, 2013, the Honourable Jason Kenney was sworn in as Minister of Employment and Social Development. Concurrently, the name of the Department was changed to Employment and Social Development Canada.

Employment and social development represent two major priorities for the Department, in keeping with our mission to build a stronger and more competitive Canada, to support Canadians in making choices that help them live productive and rewarding lives, and to improve Canadians’ quality of life.

2.1 About Employment and Social Development Canada

ESDC’s mission is to build a stronger and more competitive Canada, to support Canadians in making choices that help them live productive and rewarding lives and to improve Canadians’ quality of life.

To do this, we:

  • develop policies that make Canada a society in which all can use their talents, skills and resources to participate in learning, work and their community;
  • create programs and support initiatives that help Canadians move through life’s transitions—from families with children to seniors, from school to work, from one job to another, from unemployment to employment, from the workforce to retirement;
  • create better outcomes for Canadians through service excellence with Service Canada and other partners; and
  • engage our employees, establish a healthy work environment, nurture a culture of teamwork and build our leadership capacity.

3.0 About the Access to Information Act

The Access to Information Act gives individuals and organizations present in Canada the right to access information held in federal government records, subject to a few limited and specific exceptions and exclusions

4.0 Access to information at ESDC

In processing requests for information under the Access to Information Act, ESDC must strike a balance when weighing the public’s right to know with the institution’s legitimate obligation to withhold specific information in an effort to protect the larger interests of society. The Department contains a wealth of personal information pertaining to individuals in our records, and unless very specific conditions set out in the Act allow for its release, such information must be severed from disclosure. ESDC subjects all requested records to a thorough review to determine if any information should be withheld.

4.1 Access to information delegations

Section 73 of the Access to Information Act empowers the head of the institution to delegate any of the powers, duties or functions assigned to him or her by the Act to employees of the institution.

In February 2009, the Honourable Diane Finley, the then Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development, approved a Delegation Order for the Access to Information Act, delegating the authority for access to information to key positions within the senior management team, as well as to Departmental officials who have the knowledge and expertise to exercise the powers, duties or functions of the Minister under the legislation.

The Delegation Order is attached as Annex A.

4.2 Chief Privacy Officer

The Chief Privacy Officer is the Department’s functional authority on all privacy matters, which includes the provision of authoritative advice and functional direction to all Departmental branches and regions. The Chief Privacy Officer is responsible for the proactive management of privacy issues in the Department and the establishment of comprehensive privacy management frameworks, programs, review processes, and risk-based approaches to privacy management.

In addition to establishing Departmental privacy directives, standards, guidelines, and processes, the Chief Privacy Officer is accountable for the implementation of the Department’s privacy management program, including the coordination and management of privacy activities, which includes oversight of the Department’s privacy governance structure with clear accountabilities and defined objectives that are aligned with Departmental and government-wide policies, priorities and plans. The Department’s privacy program is monitored, assessed and reported-on to measure performance against expected results.

4.3 Transition in Access and Privacy roles and responsibilities

Effective October 1, 2013, the Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) and Privacy Renewal Divisions were re-aligned to address the evolution of the privacy management function within the Department. The objectives of the re-alignment include:

  • Support the continued modernization of the Department’s privacy function and the implementation of the Privacy Renewal Action Plan;
  • Clarify the mandates, roles, responsibilities, and accountabilities of the Divisions to better
  • Respond to the evolving needs of the Department;
  • Better align resources to Departmental priorities; and
  • Structure the organization to optimize performance and results.

The Divisions are re-aligned as follows.

5.0 ESDC’s structure, functions, and responsibilities

5.1 Privacy management division

The Privacy Management Division is the Departmental focal-point for the management of privacy policy and the implementation of the Department’s Privacy Management Framework. Under the authority and direction of the Chief Privacy Officer, the Privacy Management Division supports the horizontal coordination and implementation of Departmental strategic plans and priorities as it relates to the protection of privacy, including the Department’s multi-year Privacy Management Action Plan. The Division also manages the Department’s privacy risk management function, including the Privacy Impact Assessment process and the development of Information Sharing Agreements involving personal information.

The Privacy management division includes two units:

  • The Privacy compliance and review unit provides advice, guidance, and privacy-related services to Departmental officials on the application of relevant privacy legislation, policies, directives and guidance. This includes the management of the Department’s Personal Information Banks in InfoSource, the review of privacy notice statements, contracts, and other forms and instruments for privacy compliance, and the provision of advice and guidance for the development of Information Sharing Agreements. The Unit is also tasked with the day-to-day issues management related to the protection of personal information under the custody and control of the Department; and
  • The Policy, planning, and coordination unit is responsible for the development and implementation of the Department’s privacy policy suite, strategic support services to the Chief Privacy Officer and the Privacy and Information Security Committee, and strategic planning and reporting functions. The Unit is also responsible for the design and implementation of the Department’s Privacy Program, the privacy risk management process, the review and assessment of strategic policy and program priorities, and research and evaluation of emerging trends. The Unit also supports the management and implementation of horizontal issues and working groups.

5.2 Access to Information and Privacy Operations Division

The Access to Information and Privacy Operations Division carries out the Department’s legislated requirements under the Privacy Act and the Access to Information Act. The Division leads the processing of all requests under the Access to Information Act, and coordinates the processing of Privacy Act requests, many of which are handled at the regional level. This work involves responding to requests from the public and delivering training and awareness programs to employees with respect to administration of the two Acts.

The Division is responsible for providing guidance to the regions with respect to the operational and reporting components of the Access to Information and Privacy function. As part of the delegated authority within this unit, the Division responds to legal instruments in which the Department is asked to share personal information, (i.e., subpoenas, court orders, search warrants), liaises with the Office of the Information Commissioner and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner regarding complaints received by the Department, and serves as the Departmental point of contact with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner on privacy breaches. The Division is also responsible for managing the disclosure of information to third parties via public interest disclosures.

The ATIP Operations Division includes two units:

  • The ATIP processing unit performs a line-by-line review of records requested under the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act. Reports are provided for information purposes on a weekly basis to the Deputy Ministers’ Offices and the Ministers’ Offices, both on new Access to Information requests and upcoming releases under the Access to Information Act.
  • The Incident management and legislative disclosures unit helps support consistent treatment of personal information entrusted to the Department, and leads the Departmental response to all legal instruments received. The Unit also manages complaints to the OPC by Departmental clients and interacts with the OPC on privacy breaches, working in partnership with the Departmental Security Office.

5.3 Branch and regional access to information activities

While the ATIP Operations Director, with support from the Division’s ATIP Operations officers, has overall authority for the administration of the Access to Information Act, branches and regions also play a key role.

The Department has a network of regional, local and branch coordinators to undertake many of its key privacy responsibilities. The majority of the thousands of Privacy Act requests that ESDC receives in a typical year are processed by employees within ESDC’s regional offices. Regional privacy activities have been centralized under Regional Privacy Centres of Specialization to maintain capacity and expertise. ESDC’s Regional Privacy Centres of Specialization officers have delegated authority to process formal privacy requests under the Privacy Act and also process informal requests received by the Department. Under the functional direction of the Departmental Chief Privacy Officer, regional offices also provide privacy advice and guidance to regional management and members of the public.  

5.4 ESDC’s commitment to respect timeframes

Except for specific circumstances in which an extension can be claimed, the Access to Information Act provides 30 calendar days for responding to requests. Given these strict timeframes and the Department’s commitment to respect the spirit and the letter of the legislation, the following processes and responsibilities are established at ESDC:

  • Retrieval of relevant records and formulation of recommendations: Targeted branches and regions (offices of primary interest) are allotted eight working days to retrieve complete and accurate records in response to requests and provide them, along with recommendations, to the ATIP Operations Division.
  • Line-by-line review of the responsive records: The ATIP Processing Unit is provided with eight working days to do a thorough line-by-line review of the records and to invoke the limited and specific exemption and exclusion provisions that are applicable.
  • Seen and noted signatures, and copies for information: If requested, the Executive Head of the targeted branch or region is provided a copy of the release package and is given four working days to provide his or her signature indicating that he or she is aware that the records are being released (i.e. for seen and noted purposes). At the same time that the records are provided to the office of primary interest, copies of the package are provided to Departmental communications officials. Employees from the Deputy Ministers’ Offices and the Ministers’ Offices are also given a copy of the package for information purposes, when requested. Some files may require the preparation of media lines. The preparation of communications products is undertaken by communications and branch officials and does not impact the timely processing of access to information requests.

The three steps described account for a total of 20 working days. ESDC’s ATIP Operations Division has a long-standing history of keeping its partners informed throughout the process when responding to access to information requests. This collaborative approach supports a no-surprise environment for stakeholders within ESDC, enabling officials in the ATIP Operations Division to appropriately administer the legislation with few delays.

6.0 Activities and accomplishments in 2013–2014

6.1 Challenges

This year was marked by the retirement of senior employees in the ATIP Processing Unit which greatly impacted the workforce capacity, creating a need for expertise within the office. To maintain an effective handling of requests within the existing resources, the ATIP Operations Division recognized the importance of seeking new and innovative ways to process requests within the legislated timeframe.

6.2 Business process redesign

Consequently, in May 2013, ESDC launched a Business Process Redesign (BPR) of the Access to Information (ATI) process in the Department, to oversee and identify more efficient and innovative ways of dealing with the increasing volume and complexity of ATI requests. The initiative’s goal was also to improve efficiencies in the management and processing of ATI requests across ESDC (ESD, Service Canada and the Labour Program); simplify and streamline work requirements for ATIP Operations Divisional staff and partners (Branches and Regions); better fulfill our obligations under the Access to Information Act; and, reduce the paper burden.

A cross functional workgroup was created to examine the current process, using the BPR methodology. Some quick modifications to the process were quickly implemented and other innovative medium-term solutions are being analyzed, to determine the way forward in the fourth and final phase of implementation.

6.3 Stewardship of information and effective workplace behaviours tool

ESDC has developed a mandatory online training course designed to provide employees with the knowledge of how to protect and manage the resources, including personal information, entrusted to them as employees of ESDC. The Stewardship of Information and Effective Workplace Behaviours training tool, produced by the Service Canada College of ESDC, was created by pedagogical experts in collaboration with subject matter experts, including from the ATIP Operations Division. The module covers six disciplines related to the stewardship of information: security, information technology (IT) security, information management, values and ethics/code of conduct, privacy, and access to information.

Launched in 2013-2014, this course supports the Department’s commitment to enhancing the responsible use and care of Departmental and personal information and is required to be completed by all employees across the Department. To date, more than 44 % of employees have completed the training. This module will be required to be retaken every two years. New employees joining the Department are also required to complete this course. This is the first training of its kind available at ESDC and will support a culture of access to information awareness within the Department.

6.4 Access to Information and Privacy training and awareness activities

In 2013–2014, the ATIP Operations Division provided 14 in-person training sessions on access to information and privacy issues to 109 employees across the Department. In response to recurring questions from program experts regarding the scoping of records and on the formulation of recommendations regarding the Access to Information Act’s exemption and exclusion provisions, the ATIP Operations Division updated and shared its guidance on these topics with program areas. Recognizing that not all employees are tasked with requests on a regular basis, the guidance is brief and provides key pointers to assist those responsible for gathering records to fulfill their responsibilities.

In addition to the sessions that were offered by the ATIP Operations Division, the regional officials responsible for privacy in the regions also provided information sessions to their colleagues. Regional officials provided 20 sessions to 677 employees during 2013–2014.

Overall, provision of in-person access to information training has been replaced by the Departmental transition to an online, self-directed integrated learning model, not only for access to information but also for privacy, security, IT security, information management and values and ethics/code of conduct.

7.0 Performance reporting for 2013–2014

7.1 Requests for Information under the Access to Information Act

The following is a summary of the information contained in the Statistical Report on the Access to Information Act for 2013–2014, which is attached as Annex B.

Statistical report summary
2011 - 2012 2012 - 2013 2013 - 2014
Formal request received under the Access to Information Act. 579 746 861
Requests completed/processed during the year 531 630 932
Number of pages processed 120,109 112,087 101,577
Request completed within:
30 calendar days 276 314 388
31-60 calendar days 171 195 273
61 or more calendar days 82 121 212
Proportion of requests that were responded to within legislated

timeframes according to Information Commissioner's standards
97% 92% 88%
Complaints to the Information Commissioner of Canada 24 20 38

7.2 Total of access to information requests completed

The Department received 861 requests during the reporting period and completed 932 requests. Both figures are higher in comparison to previous years.

Figure 1 - Requests for Information under the Access to Information Act

Figure 1 - Requests for Information Under the <em>Privacy Act</em>
Text description - Requests for Information under the Access to Information Act

The figure is a chart showing numbers of requests for records under the Access to Information Act received and completed by ESDC in each of the past three fiscal years (2011-2012 to 2013-2014).

There are two categories: “Formal requests received under the Access to Information Act” and “Formal requests completed under the Access to Information Act.”

Figure 1- Requests received and completed under the Access to Information Act
Received Completed
2011-2012 579 531
2012-2013 746 630
2013-2014 861 932

7.3 Sources of requests

The most common source of requests was the general public (36%), followed by businesses (23%), organizations (22%), and the media (18%).  Academics accounted for 1% of the requests submitted to ESDC in 2013–2014.

Figure 2 - Sources of requests under the Access to Information Act

Figure 2 - Sources of requests under the <em>Access to Information Act Act</em>
Text description - Requests for Information under the Access to Information Act

The figure is a chart showing sources of requests as a proportion of total requests under the Access to Information Act during the 2013-2014 fiscal year.

There are five categories: “General public”, “Businesses”, “Media”, “Organizations” and “Academics”.

Sources of requests under the Access to Information Act
Business 23%
Academics 1%
General public 36%
Medias 18%
Organization 22%

Typical requests included those for statistics on the Department’s various programs:

  • briefing notes;
  • research and studies on issues of interest to the ESDC portfolio;
  • requests from employers or their representative for records regarding their own applications under the Temporary Foreign Worker Program;
  • requests for information on contracts, including deliverables;
  • requests for documents regarding issues that were reported in the news media.

7.4 Processing times

Of the requests in which records were provided to the applicant, 26% were disclosed in full, while in 52% of cases, at least some of the information was withheld in accordance with the exemption and exclusion provisions permitted under the Access to Information Act.  Nearly half of requests received (48%) were processed within 30 days, and 77% were processed within the first 60 days.

Figure 3 - Requests under the Access to Information Act by calendar days taken to complete

Figure 3 - Requests under the <em>Access to Information Act</em> by calendar days taken to complete
Text description - Requests under the Access to Information Act by calendar days taken to complete

The figure is a chart showing numbers of requests completed in each for the past three fiscal years (2011-2012 to 2013-2014), categorized based on the number of days taken to complete the requests.

There are three categories: “30 calendar days”, “31-60 calendar days” and “61 or more calendar days”.

Requests under the Access to Information Act by calendar days taken to complete
30 calendar days 31-60 calendar days 61 or more calendar days
2011-2012 53% 33% 15%
2012-2013 50% 31% 19%
2013-2014 48% 29% 23%

7.5 Exemptions and exclusions

Exemptions and exclusions are the only grounds to withhold information found in records that are requested under the Access to Information Act. Their application is limited and specific, as stipulated in the Act. On the requests where an exemption was invoked, the most frequently applied provision was subsection 19(1), which seeks to protect personal information pertaining to individuals other than the requester.

Other frequently used exemptions include section 21, which is used to protect the integrity of the Government’s decision-making process including advice, recommendations, deliberations,  plans and positions relating to ongoing negotiations; section 20 to protect third-party confidential information held in government records; subsection 24(1), which is used to withhold information for which disclosure is prohibited by other federal laws, for example, the Income Tax Act; section 16, which permits institutions to withhold information that would be injurious to lawful investigations or information that would enable the commission of an offence; section 23, which is the exemption provision used to withhold information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege; and section 14, which serves to withhold information that would be injurious to federal-provincial relations/negotiation if released. Other exemptions were invoked in 29 cases or less.

The Act indicates that certain types of materials are excluded from its application, specifically, records that are already available to the public (section 68) and Cabinet Confidences (section 69). A total of 64 sections 69 exclusions were invoked on 42 requests during the reporting period. 

The Department provided records in paper format in 564 cases and electronically (on CD) for 152 requests. When requests contain a large number of pages for release, records are usually provided electronically.

7.6 Pages processed

A total of 101,577 pages were reviewed (processed) by staff during the reporting period, with 87,116 pages disclosed (in full or in part) to requesters. The remaining 14,461 pages were either withheld pursuant to one or more of the Act’s exemption or exclusion provisions, or were not disclosed because the applicant had abandoned the request.

While most requests (80%) corresponded to a review of 500 pages or less, 24 requests (3%) required a review of more than 1,000 pages each. These 24 requests resulted in the release of 36,541 pages, or 42% of the pages that were disclosed during the reporting period. 

7.7 Other complexities

In addition to information regarding the number of pages processed, the statistical report contains information regarding “Other Complexities,” namely the number of requests where consultations are required, where fees were assessed, where legal advice was sought or “Other.” The category “Other,” according to the Treasury Board Secretariat, “comprises high profile subject matter, requests where records are in a region or other country, and requests where the records are in a language other than English or French.” 

Consultations were required on 93 requests. Legal advice was sought on the processing of 42 of the requests that were completed in 2013–2014. Fees were assessed on 58 requests. Finally, 194 requests fell into the category “Other,” corresponding to the requests in which regional records were sought.

7.8 Performance

The Department was unable to meet its deadline for 87 requests, representing 9% of the requests that were processed. The most common reason for missing the deadline was workload (61%), with external and internal consultations accounting for the remaining requests.

Throughout the year, as an increasing number of requests required lengthy consultations, the ATIP Operations Division continued its practice of contacting requesters to determine whether they were willing to exclude records that require these types of consultations, thereby reducing the time taken to process the requests. This course of action was beneficial to the applicant, to the Department and to other institutions responsible for responding to consultations. The Department was late by 30 days or less in 45 of the 87 cases. The remaining 42 requests were late by 30 to 365 days.

7.9 Extensions

An extension beyond the initial 30 days is permitted if responding to the request would require a search through a large volume of records and responding within the first 30 days would unreasonably interfere with operations, or if external consultations (with another institution, organization or business) are required. In 2013–2014, the Department claimed an extension on 319 requests, with the majority of extensions due to volume.

7.10 Translation of records

No requests for translation were received during the 2013–2014 fiscal year.

7.11 Fees

The Department collected $3,793 in fees, as permitted by the Act and its Regulations, and waived $17,953, in fees. Most of the waived fees correspond to reproduction fees, which are no longer chargeable to the client given the increased use of electronic media for release of records. When requesters are provided with the records on CD, reproduction fees are waived. When a release package comprises 125 pages or less, reproduction fees are not charged, in accordance with guidance from the Treasury Board Secretariat.

7.12 Consultations received by ESDC

ESDC responded to 188 consultations, corresponding to a review of 12,828 pages, from other federal institutions. In 86% of the consultations, the Department was able to respond within 30 days, with most consultations receiving a response in 15 days or less. Almost 65% of these consultations resulted in a recommendation to disclose the records entirely, with the Department counselling the consulting institution to disclose in part in 30% of the time. In the remaining cases, the consulting institution was either asked to consult with another institution, to exempt the records in their entirety or take a different course of action (“Other”).

Consultations on Cabinet Confidences were sent to the Privy Council Office for 14 of the requests that were closed in 2013–2014, and ESDC’s Legal Services Unit on nine requests, in accordance with the new procedures which came into force in July of 2013. This revised TBS issued process requires that consultations on Cabinet confidences be sent to Legal Services Unit rather than the Privy Council Office.

7.13 Financial considerations

The Department spent $640,000 on salaries associated with administering the Access to Information Act, with non-salary costs amounting to $7,500.

Approximately 8 dedicated resources at National Headquarters were involved in administering the Access to Information Act during 2013–2014.

8.0 Request summaries posted to ESDC website

Since January 2012, ESDC has been posting the summaries of its completed Access to Information Act requests on the Departmental website on a monthly basis, in accordance with the Treasury Board Secretariat’s directives. In 2013–2014, 204 release packages were provided informally to requesters upon request.

9.0 Complaints and investigations

The Department was notified of 38 complaints received by the Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) during 2013–2014. Fifteen complaints were lodged as a result of a fee assessment that was prepared to respond to the requests, thirteen of which originated from a single applicant. Ten complaints related to the time required by ESDC to process the requests. Seven complainants believed that not all records were provided in response to their request. Five requesters alleged that ESDC improperly invoked the Act’s exemption provisions. One complaint fell into the category of miscellaneous.

ESDC received findings on ten complaints in 2013–2014. The OIC ruled that six of the complaints were well-founded, but resolved. An additional complaint was resolved prior to the OIC determining whether the complaint had merits. The OIC determined that three of the complaints were not well founded.

10.0 Annex A: Delegation order

Department of Human Resources and Skills Development

Delegation order

Access to information act

I, Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development, pursuant to Section 73 of the Access to Information Act, hereby designate the officer or employee of the Department of Human Resources and Skills Development whose position or title is set out in the attached Schedule, or the officers or employees occupying, on an acting basis or otherwise, those positions, to exercise the powers, duties, or functions of the head of the institution under the Act that are set in the Schedule in relation to that officer or employee.

This delegation order supersedes any previous order executed pursuant to section 73 of the Act.

Dated at Ottawa, Ontario,
Signature of the Honourable Diane Finley
Text description Signature of the Honourable Diane Finley, signed 28th of February 2008

Signature of the Honourable Diane Finley, signed February 28 2008.

The Honourable Diane Finley

Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development

Access to Information Act – Delegation of authority

Department of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada
Description Section Deputy Minister HRSD Deputy Minister Labour Deputy Head Service Canada ADMs of PPCA and Labour Corporate Secretary HRSD Director ATIP Operations Manager ATIP Operations ATIP Officers
Responsibility of government institutions 4(2.1) X X X X X X X
Notice where access requested 7(a) X X X X X X X X
Giving access to record 7(b) X X X X X X X
Transfer of request to another government inst. 8(1) X X X X X X X X
Extension of time limits 9 X X X X X X X
Payment of additional fees 11(2) X X X X X X X X
Payment of fees for EDP record 11(3) X X X X X X X X
Deposit 11(4) X X X X X X X X
Notice of fee payment 11(5) X X X X X X X X
Waiver of refund of fees 11(6) X X X X X X X
Language of access 12(2)(b) X X X X X X X X
Access to alternate format 12(3)(b) X X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Obtained in confidence 13 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Federal-provincial affairs 14 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - International affairs and defence 15 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Law enforcement, investigations 16 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act 16.5 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Safety of individuals 17 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Economic Interests of Canada 18 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Economic interest of the Canada Post Corporation, Export Development Canada, the Public Sector Pension Investment Board and VIA Rail Canada Inc. 18.1 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Personal information 19 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Third party information 20 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Operations of Government 21 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Testing procedures, tests, audits 22 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Audit working papers and draft audit reports 22.1 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Solicitor-client privilege 23 X X X X X X X
Refuse access - Statutory prohibitions 24 X X X X X X X
Severability 25 X X X X X X X
Information to be published 26 X X X X X X X
Third party notification 27(1) X X X X X X X
Third party notification - Extension of time limit 27(4) X X X X X X X
Third party notification - Notice of decision 28(1)(b) X X X X X X X
Third party notification - Representations in writing 28(2) X X X X X X X
Third party notification - Disclosure of record 28(4) X X X X X X X
Where the Information Commissioner recommends disclosure 29(1) X X X X X X X
Advising Information Commissioner of third party involvement 33 X X X X X X X
Right to make representations 35(2)(b) X X X X X X X
Access to be given to complainant 37(4) X X X X X X X
Notice to third party (application to Federal Court) 43(1) X X X X X X X X
Notice to applicant (application to Federal Court by third party) 44(2) X X X X X X X X
Special rules for hearings 52(2)(b) X X X X X X X
Ex parte representations

(Federal Court)
52(3) X X X X X X X
Facilities for inspection of manuals 71(1) X X X X X X X
Annual report to Parliament 72 X X X X X X X
Regulations
Transfer of request 6(1) X X X X X X X X
Search and preparation of fees 7(2) X X X X X X X X
Production and programming fees 7(3) X X X X X X X X
Providing access to records 8 X X X X X X X
Limitations in respect of format 8.1 X X X X X X X

11.0 Annex B: Statistical report on the access to information

Name of institution: Employment and Social Development Canada

Reporting period: 2013/04/01 to 2014/03/31

Part 1 - Request under the Access to Information Act

1.1 Number of requests
Number of requests
Received during reporting period 861
Outstanding from previous period 228
Total 1,089
Closed during reporting period 932
Carried over to next reporting period 157


1.2 Sources of requests
Source Number of requests
Media 154
Academia 5
Business (Private sector) 203
Organization 187
Public 312
Total 861

Part 2 - Requests closed during the reporting period

2.1 Disposition and completion time
Disposition of

requests
Completion time
1 to 15 days 16 to 30 days 31 to 60 days 61 to 120 days 121 to 180 days 181 to 365 days More than 365 days Total
All disclosed 26 124 81 9 2 0 1 243
Disclosed in part 2 130 154 122 41 20 4 473
All exempted 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 7
All excluded 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
No records exist 3 95 31 3 0 0 0 132
Request transferred 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Request abandoned 20 37 3 2 0 1 3 66
Treated informally 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total 59 388 273 138 43 23 8 932


2.2 Exemptions
Section Number of requests
13(1)(a) 0
13(1)(b) 0
13(1)(c) 4
13(1)(e) 0
14(a) 0
14(b) 44
15(a)-IA 1
15(1)-Def 16
15(1)-S.A 0
16(1)(a)(i) 1
16(1)(a)(ii) 0
16(1)(a)(iii) 0
16(1)(b) 3
16(1)(c) 13
16(1)(d) 1
16(2)(a) 130
16(2)(b) 0
16(2)(c) 7
16(3) 0
16(1)(1)(a) 0
16(1)(1)(b) 0
16(1)(1)(c) 0
16(1)(1)(d) 0
16.2(1) 0
16.4(1)(a) 0
16.4(1)(b) 0
16.5 0
17 2
18(a) 0
18(b) 1
18(c) 0
18(d) 1
18.1(1)(a) 0
18.1(1)(b) 0
18.1(1)(c) 0
18.1(1)(d) 0
19(1) 368
20(1)(a) 1
20(1)(b) 109
20(1)(b.1) 0
20(1)(c) 103
20(1)(d) 26
20.1 0
20.2 0
20.4 0
21(1)(a) 76
21(1)(b) 125
21(1)(c) 14
21(1)(d) 10
22 6
22.1(1) 0
23 63
24(1) 76
26 1


2.3 Exclusions
Section Number of requests
68(a) 0
68(b) 0
68(c) 0
68.1 0
68(2)(a) 0
68.2(b) 0
68(1)(a) 4
68(1)(b) 0
68(1)(c) 1
68(1)(d) 1
68(1)(e) 11
69(1)(f) 3
69(1)(g)re(a) 5
69(1)(g)re(b) 0
69(1)(g)re(c) 2
69(1)(g)re(d) 1
69(1)(g)re(e) 9
69(1)(g)re(f) 5
69.1(1) 0


2.4 Format of information release
Disposition Paper Electronic Other formats
All disclosed 221 22 0
Disclosed in part 343 130 0
Total 564 152 0


2.5 Complexity

2.5.1 Relevant pages processed and disclosed
Disposition of requests Number of pages processed Number of pages disclosed Number of requests
All disclosed 10,444 10,044 243
Disclosed in part 88,854 77,072 473
All exempted 199 0 7
All excluded 262 0 2
Request abandoned 1,818 0 66


2.5.2 Relevant pages processed and disclosed by size of requests
Disposition Less than 100

pages processed
101-500

pages processed
501-1,000

pages processed
1,001-5,000

pages processed
More than 5,000

pages processed
Number of

requests
Pages disclosed Number of

requests
Pages disclosed Number of

requests
Pages disclosed Number of

requests
Pages disclosed Number of

requests
Pages disclosed
All disclosed 222 3,212 18 4,450 2 1,124 1 1,258 0 0
Disclosed in part 324 9,608 104 20,556 22 11,625 23 35,283 0 0
All exempted 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All excluded 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Abandoned 63 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Total 616 12,820 126 25,006 25 12,749 24 36,541 0 0


2.5.3 Other complexities
Disposition Consultation required Assessment of fees Legal advice sought Other Total
All disclosed 8 4 5 39 56
Disclosed in part 79 13 33 132 257
All exempted 1 0 2 0 3
All excluded 2 0 0 2 4
Abandoned 3 41 2 21 67
Total 93 58 42 194 387

2.6 Deemed refusals

2.6.1 Reasons for not meeting statutory deadline
Number of requests closed past the statutory deadline Principal reason
Workload External consultation Internal consultation Other
87 53 18 9 7


2.6.2 Number of days past deadline
Number of days past deadline Number of requests past deadline where no extension was taken Number of requests past deadline where an extension was taken Total
1 to 15 days 11 22 33
16 to 30 days 2 10 12
31 to 60 days 1 13 14
61 to 120 days 1 13 14
121 to 180 days 1 6 7
181 to 365 days 0 2 2
More than 365 days 0 5 5
Total 16 71 87


2.7 Translation request
Translation requests Paper Electronic Other
From English to French 0 0 0
From French to English 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0

Part 3 - Extensions

3.1 Reasons for extensions and disposition of requests
Disposition of requests where an extension was taken 9(1)(a)

Interference with operations
9(1)(b)

Consultation
9(1)(c) Third party notice
Section 69 Other
All disclosed 10 1 8 1
Disclosed in part 200 12 67 2
All exempted 2 1 0 0
All excluded 0 0 2 0
No records exist 1 0 0 1
Request abandoned 6 0 5 0
Total 219 14 82 4


3.2 Length of extensions
Length of extensions 9(1)(a)

Interference with operations
9(1)(b)

Consultation
9(1)(c)Third party notice
Section 69 Other
30 days or less 98 1 16 0
31 to 60 days 43 1 34 4
61 to 120 days 77 12 28 0
121 to 180 days 1 0 4 0
181 to 365 days 0 0 0 0
Total 219 14 82 4


Part 4 - Fees
Fee Type Fee collected Fee waived or refunded
Number of requests Amount Number of requests Amount
Application 750 $3,750 106 $530
Search 3 $43 0 $0
Production 0 $0 0 $0
Programming 0 $0 0 $0
Preparation 0 $0 0 $0
Alternate format 0 $0 0 $0
Reproduction 0 $0 716 $17,423
Total 753 $3,793 822 $17,953

Part 5 - Consultations received from other institutions and organizations

5.1 Consultations received from other government institutions and organizations
Consultations Other government institutions Number of pages to review Other organizations Number of pages to review
Received during the reporting period 185 12,672 11 268
Outstanding from the previous reporting period 10 304 0 0
Total 195 12,976 11 268
Closed during the reporting period 188 12,828 11 268
Pending at the end of the reporting period 7 148 0 0


5.2 Recommendations and completion time for consultations received from other government institutions
Recommendation Number of days required to complete consultation requests
1 to 15 days 16 to 30 days 31 to 60 days 61 to 120 days 121 to 180 days 181 to 365 days More than 365 days Total
Disclose entirely 65 40 9 3 0 0 0 117
Disclose in part 30 19 5 2 1 0 0 57
Exempt entirely 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 5
Exclude entirely 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Consult other institution 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Other 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 6
Total 100 61 15 8 4 0 0 188


5.3 Recommendations and completion time for consultations received from other organizations
Recommendation Number of days required to complete consultation requests
1 to 15 days 16 to 30 days 31 to 60 days 61 to 120 days 121 to 180 days 181 to 365 days More than 365 days Total
Disclose entirely 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 7
Disclose in part 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 4
Exempt entirely 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Exclude entirely 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Consult other institution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 11

Part 6 - Completion time of consultations on Cabinet confidence

Number of days Number of responses received Number of responses received past deadline
1 to 15 1 0
16 to 30 6 0
31 to 60 10 0
61 to 120 2 2
121 to 180 0 0
181 to 365 3 3
More than 365 1 1
Total 23 6


Part 7 - Resources related to the Access to Information Act

7.1 Costs
Expenditures Amount
Salaries $640,000
Overtime $0
Goods and Services $7,500
  • Professional services contracts ($0)
  • Other ($7,500)
Total $647,500


7.2 Human resources
Resources Dedicated full-time to ATI activities Dedicated part-time to ATI activities Total
Full-time employees 0.00 8.40 8.40
Part-time and casual employees 0.00 0.00 0.00
Regional staff 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consultants and agency personnel 0.00 0.00 0.00
Students 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.00 8.40 8.40

Additional reporting requirements - Access to Information Act

Appendix A

Previously released ATI package released informally
Institution Number of informal releases of previously released ATI packages
Employment and Social Development Canada 204
Completed Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs)
Institution Number of completed PIAs
Employment and Social Development Canada 10


Completion time of consultations on Cabinet confidences under the ATIA - Requests with legal services
Number of days Less than 100 pages processed 101 to 500 pages processed 501 to 1,000

pages processed
1,001 to 5,000

pages processed
More than 5,000

pages processed
Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed
1 to 15 1 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 to 30 3 98 2 431 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 to 60 2 67 0 0 1 491 0 0 0 0
61 to 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
121 to 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
181 to 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
More than 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 6 234 2 431 1 491 0 0 0 0


Completion time of consultations on Cabinet confidences under the ATIA - Requests with Privy Council Office
Number of days Less than 100 pages processed 101 to 500 pages processed 501 to 1,000

pages processed
1,001 to 5,000

pages processed
More than 5,000

pages processed
Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed
1 to 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 to 30 1 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 to 60 6 167 1 146 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 to 120 1 42 0 0 0 0 1 3,823 0 0
121 to 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
181 to 365 0 0 3 76 0 0 0 0 0 0
More than 365 0 0 1 228 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 8 250 5 450 0 0 1 3,823 0 0


Completion time of consultations on Cabinet confidences under the PA - Requests with legal services
Number of days Less than 100 pages processed 101 to 500 pages processed 501 to 1,000

pages processed
1,001 to 5,000

pages processed
More than 5,000

pages processed
Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed
1 to 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 to 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 to 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 to 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
121 to 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
181 to 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
More than 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Completion time of consultations on Cabinet confidences under the PA - Requests Privy Council Office
Number of days Less than 100 pages processed 101 to 500 pages processed 501 to 1,000

pages processed
1,001 to 5,000

pages processed
More than 5,000

pages processed
Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed
1 to 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 to 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 to 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 to 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
121 to 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
181 to 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
More than 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

The tables above in Appendix A of the Statistical Report include reporting data under both the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act pursuant to 2013-2014 Treasury Board Secretariat reporting requirements.

Page details

2017-03-03