Mental and psychological health, work-life balance, and job satisfaction in federally regulated workplaces: Results from the 2022 Survey of Employees under Federal Jurisdiction

On this page

List of tables

List of figures

Introduction

This report examines the results of the 2022 Survey of Employees under Federal Jurisdiction (SEFJ) on mental and psychological health, work-related stress factors, work-life balance, and job satisfaction. The survey targeted employees working for employers covered by Part III of the Canada Labour Code except certain miscellaneous activities and First Nation band councils and related activities (for more information, see "Data source, methods and notes to the reader"). In the rest of the document, the target universe of the survey is referred to as the "federal jurisdiction". Tables of statistics from the survey are also available on the Open Government Portal.

Women employees in the federal jurisdiction more likely to have taken leave for mental health reasons

Leaves can help support employees through difficult life events such injury or illness. Among employees under federal jurisdiction, 9.5% indicated that they had taken a leave for mental health reasons.Footnote 1 Telecommunications and broadcasting and rail transportation were the sectors with highest rates of mental health leave usage, at 16.6% and 12.5%, respectively.

Across all sectors in the federal jurisdiction, the proportion of women employees who had taken leave for mental health reasons (11.8%) was higher than men (8.2%). Women in rail transportation were close to 3 times (28.2%Footnote 2) as likely as men (10.0%) to have taken leave such a leave, while women in maritime transportation (11.1%) and courier services and pipelines (14.2%) were about twice as likely (Figure 1). By contrast, women working in banks had similar rates (10.0%) of mental health leave usage to those of men (10.1%).

Figure 1: Share of employees who have taken leave for mental health reasons by sector and gender
Figure 1: Share of employees who have taken leave for mental health reasons by sector and gender - Text description follows
Figure 1: text version
Sector Men and Women Men Women
All sectors 9.5% 8.2% 11.8%
Air transportation 8.8% 8.0% 10.6%
Rail transportation 12.5% 10.0% 28.2%
Road transportation 5.4% 4.8% 7.9%
Maritime transportation 6.5% 5.0% 11.1%
Courier and pipelines 8.8% 7.2% 14.2%
Banks 10.1% 10.1% 10.0%
Feed, flour, seed and grain 6.8% 6.5% 7.6%
Telecommunications and broadcasting 16.6% 14.5% 19.8%

Employees in banks and telecommunications and broadcasting were the most likely to believe they would have been supported to take leave for mental health reasons

Employees that feel supported by their employer to take leave may feel less obligated to work when feeling unwell. Most employees working in federally regulated workplaces believed they would have been “supported” or “very supported” to take leave for mental health reasons.Footnote 3 Overall, 65.6% of employees held this belief, while 11.8% felt they would have been “neither supported nor unsupported”, 11.0% thought they would have been “unsupported” or “very unsupported”, and 11.5% answered “not applicable”. The proportion of employees who felt they would have been “supported” or “very supported” was highest in banks (75.8%) and in telecommunications and broadcasting (72.8%), while it was lowest in rail transportation (50.7%) and in courier services and pipelines (54.8%).

Across all sectors under federal jurisdiction, women (69.7%) were slightly more likely than men (63.4%) to believe they would have been “supported” or “very supported” to take mental health leave (Figure 2). At the same time, there were several sectors where the share of men believing they would have been supported was similar to that of women, including feed, flour, seed and grain, and road transportation.

Figure 2: Share of employees who believe they would have been "supported" or "very supported" to take leave for mental health reasons by sector and gender
Figure 2: Share of employees who believe they would have been supported or very supported to take leave for mental health reasons by sector and gender - Text description follows
Figure 2: text version
Sector Men and Women Men Women
All sectors 65.6% 63.4% 69.7%
Air transportation 57.6% 55.4% 62.9%
Rail transportation 50.7% 49.4% 58.3%
Road transportation 56.8% 56.7% 57.4%
Maritime transportation 65.1% 65.6% 63.6%
Courier and pipelines 54.8% 53.2% 60.1%
Banks 75.8% 76.2% 75.5%
Feed, flour, seed and grain 65.0% 64.9% 65.4%
Telecommunications and broadcasting 72.8% 73.1% 72.5%

Workload the most frequent work-related factor causing stress

Employees may experience workplace stress for several reasons including heavy workloads, uneasy relationships with managers or coworkers, or difficulty balancing work and personal life. Within the federal jurisdiction, the most common source of workplace stress in a typical week was workload, with 28.5% of employees indicating that they were “always” or “often” stressed by their volume of work (Figure 3).Footnote 4 Some 17.9% of respondents reported wages or salary as a frequent source of stress, 17.6% stated hours of work, while about 12.5% identified the temporary status of the job. Risk of job loss was mentioned as a source of stress by 11.4% of employees.

Workload was the most cited source of stress in all sectors but rail transportation, with employees in banking citing it the most often (34.3% indicated it was a source of stress “always” or “often”). At the same time, air transportation had the highest share of workers declaring their wages or salaries as a frequent source of stress (25.8%). Rail transportation was the sector with the highest share of workers (25.9%) reporting their hours of work as a frequent source of stress. Meanwhile, employees in rail transportation were also the most likely to mention the temporary job status (28.6%Footnote 5) and risk of job loss (22.5%Footnote 6) as frequent sources of stress.Footnote 7

Figure 3: Work-related factors by share of employees indicating that it caused them stress "always" or "often"
Figure 3: Work-related factors by share of employees indicating that it caused them stress always or often - Text description follows
  • Note 1: As separate responses for each factor were provided, the number of valid responses on which the proportions are based may differ between factors.
  • Note 2: Employees who indicated that "Permanent employee" best describes their employment status are excluded from the "Temporary status of the job" estimates.
Figure 3: text version
Work-related factor causing stress Share of employees
Wages and salary 17.9%
Benefits 6.6%
Hours of work 17.6%
Workload 28.5%
Relationships with managers 12.5%
Relationships with other employees 7.7%
Relationships with clients or customers 9.3%
Risk of job loss 11.4%
Temporary status of the job 12.4%
Other stressor 9.7%

Figure 4 examines the results by gender. It reveals that women were as likely as men to be “always” or “often” stressed by their workload (28.4% of women versus 28.6% of men), their relationship with managers (12.9% of women versus 12.3% of men), and by the risk of job loss (11.2% of women versus 11.5% of men). However, the share of men that experienced frequent stress because of benefits (7.4%) and hours of work (18.2%) was higher than the share of women (5.0% for benefits and 16.6% for hours of work). Inversely, there was a higher proportion of women than of men that experienced frequent stress because of their relationship with clients or customers (10.9% of women and 8.4% of men).

Figure 4: Work-related factors causing stress "always" or "often" by gender
Figure 4: Work-related factors causing stress always or often by gender - Text description follows
  • Note 1: As separate responses for each factor were provided, the number of valid responses on which the proportions are based may differ between factors.
  • Note 2: Employees who indicated that "Permanent employee" best describes their employment status are excluded from the "Temporary status of the job" estimates.
Figure 4: text version
Work-related factor causing stress Men and Women Men Women
Wages and salary 17.9% 17.5% 18.7%
Benefits 6.5% 7.4% 5.0%
Hours of work 17.6% 18.2% 16.6%
Workload 28.5% 28.6% 28.4%
Relationships with other employees 7.7% 8.0% 7.1%
Relationships with managers 12.5% 12.3% 12.9%
Relationships with clients or customers 9.3% 8.4% 10.9%
Risk of job loss 11.4% 11.5% 11.2%
Temporary status of the job 12.5% 12.9% 11.0%
Other stressor 9.7% 9.6% 9.9%

Most employees agree or somewhat agree that their work environment is psychologically healthy

Most employees working in federally regulated workplaces reported that their work environment was psychologically healthy.Footnote 8 In fact, 62.6% of employees indicated that they “strongly agree” or “somewhat agree” that this was the case (Figure 5). The others responded, “neither agree nor disagree” (19.0%), “somewhat disagree” (9.8%), or “strongly disagree” (6.2%). At the same time, 1.7% of employees indicated that they “don’t know” and 0.8% selected “not applicable”.

Employees in rail transportation (44.0%) and air transportation (50.6%) were the least likely to “strongly agree” or “somewhat agree” that their work environment was psychologically healthy. Meanwhile, men (61.6%) working in the federal jurisdiction were almost as likely as women (64.1%) to report working in a psychologically healthy work environment.

Figure 5: Share of employees who "strongly agree" or "somewhat agree" that their work environment is psychologically healthy by sector and gender
Figure 5: Share of employees who strongly agree or somewhat agree that their work environment is psychologically healthy by sector and gender - Text description follows
Figure 5: text version
Sector Men and Women Men Women
All sectors 62.6% 61.6% 64.1%
Air transportation 50.6% 51.7% 48.2%
Rail transportation 44.0% 44.4% 41.9%
Road transportation 66.2% 65.8% 67.5%
Maritime transportation 60.9% 60.3% 62.7%
Courier and pipelines 57.4% 57.5% 57.1%
Banks 67.4% 65.6% 69.0%
Feed, flour, seed and grain 68.3% 67.1% 71.9%
Telecommunications and broadcasting 62.4% 63.6% 60.7%

Across the federal jurisdiction, 19.9% of employees indicated that they felt tense, depressed, worried, gloomy, uneasy, or miserable “often” or “always” in a typical week (Table 1).Footnote 9 33.7% of employees declared having such feelings “sometimes”, while 46.5% responded “rarely” or “never”. Employees in rail transportation (28.2%) and in telecommunications and broadcasting (24.1%) were the most likely to declare experiencing such feelings frequently. At the same time, employees in road transportation (54.7%), in maritime transportation (52.1%), and in feed, flour, seed and grain (52.0%) were the most likely to “rarely” or “never” experience such feelings.Footnote 10

Table 1: Share of employees by frequency of feeling tense, depressed, worried, gloomy, uneasy, or miserable in a typical week and by sector
Sector Always or often Sometimes Rarely or never
All sectors 19.9% 33.7% 46.5%
Air transportation 18.4% 36.5% 45.1%
Rail transportation 28.2% 36.9% 34.9%
Road transportation 18.6% 26.8% 54.7%
Maritime transportation 16.9% 31.1% 52.1%
Courier and pipelines 20.2% 34.5% 45.4%
Banks 19.8% 36.5% 43.7%
Feed, flour, seed and grain 16.4% 31.5% 52.0%
Telecommunications and broadcasting 24.1% 35.5% 40.4%

Employees were also asked how often they felt satisfied, happy, fulfilled, empowered, or engaged during a typical week (Table 2).Footnote 11 Overall, 58.6% indicated experiencing such feelings “always” or “often”, while 29.8% responded “sometimes” and 11.6% “rarely” or “never”. Employees working in banks (63.7%) and in maritime transportation (62.7%) were the most likely to report having these feelings frequently. On the other hand, employees working in rail transportation (21.0%) were the most likely to “rarely” or “never” have these feelings.

Table 2: Share of employees by frequency of feeling satisfied, happy, fulfilled, empowered, or engaged in a typical week and by sector
Sector Always or often Sometimes Rarely or never
All sectors 58.6% 29.8% 11.6%
Air transportation 56.8% 30.8% 12.4%
Rail transportation 47.0% 32.0% 21.0%
Road transportation 58.4% 28.6% 13.0%
Maritime transportation 62.7% 26.8% 10.5%
Courier and pipelines 50.1% 33.5% 16.4%
Banks 63.7% 27.2% 9.2%
Feed, flour, seed and grain 60.3% 29.3% 10.4%
Telecommunications and broadcasting 54.8% 34.7% 10.5%

Employees in rail transportation least likely to have good work-life balance

Employees were asked about the degree to which they felt that their employer offered them appropriate work-life balance. Most employees (61.8%) felt that the extent to which their employer offered them appropriate work-life balance was “good” or “very good”, including 64.8% of women and 60.3% of men (Figure 6).Footnote 12 Among federal jurisdiction sectors, employees in rail transportation (42.3%) were the least likely to report that their work-life balance was “good” or “very good”. This was true of both men (42.2%) and women (43.0%). On the other hand, employees in banks (68.2%) and in feed, flour, seed and grain (68.0%) were the most likely to indicate having a good work-life balance.

In the survey, employees were offered different options through which their work-life balance could be improved.Footnote 13 They had the option of selecting more than one option. Overall, working fewer or shorter hours per week was the most frequently selected option (25.7% of employees), followed by more flexible scheduling (20.2%), easier and more access to leaves or vacation (15.7%), and some or more access to remote work or telework (14.8%).

Across sectors under federal jurisdiction, more flexible scheduling was the most frequently cited means of improving work-life balance among employees in air transportation (26.7%), maritime transportation (17.7%), and courier services and pipelines (19.0%). Easier and more access to leaves or vacation was the most frequently selected option among employees in rail transportation (30.3%). Working fewer or shorter hours per week was the most popular option among employees in the other 4 federally regulated sectors.

Figure 6: Share of employees who found the extent to which their employer offers them appropriate work-life balance to be "good" or "very good" by sector and gender
Figure 6: Share of employees who found the extent to which their employer offers them appropriate work-life balance to be good or very good by sector and gender - Text description follows
Figure 6: text version
Sector Men and Women Men Women
All sectors 61.8% 60.3% 64.8%
Air transportation 56.2% 57.4% 53.6%
Rail transportation 42.3% 42.2% 43.0%
Road transportation 59.2% 58.4% 62.7%
Maritime transportation 63.0% 63.0% 63.2%
Courier and pipelines 54.2% 51.5% 63.5%
Banks 68.2% 66.0% 70.0%
Feed, flour, seed and grain 68.0% 65.3% 75.9%
Telecommunications and broadcasting 64.3% 65.5% 62.7%

Figure 7, which presents the results by gender, reveals that, overall, women (20.5%) were almost twice as likely as men (11.7%) to indicate that their work-life balance could be improved through some or more access to remote work or telework. On the other hand, women (10.3%) were almost as likely as men (9.6%) to indicate that their work-life balance could be improved through less take-home work or no contact from the employer outside of work, easier and more access to leave and vacations (15.2% for women versus 15.9% for men), more flexible scheduling (21.2% versus 19.6%) and less travel (7.0% versus 6.5%).

Figure 7: Share of employees by ways that work-life balance could be improved and gender
Figure 7: Share of employees by ways that work-life balance could be improved and gender - Text description follows
  • Note 1: Employees were able to give multiple valid responses. Proportions therefore represent the percentage of Yes responses for a given question independent of other questions, and do not sum to 100%.
  • Note 2: About 44.4% of men and 40.7% of women responded, “not applicable”.
Figure 7: text version
Ways work-life balance could be improved Men and Women Men Women
More notice when asked to work extra hours 9.4% 10.8% 7.0%
Less take-home work or no contact from employer outside of work 9.9% 9.6% 10.3%
Easier and more access to leave and vacations 15.7% 15.9% 15.2%
Some or more access to remote work or telework 14.8% 11.7% 20.5%
More flexible scheduling 20.2% 19.6% 21.2%
Work fewer or shorter hours per week 25.7% 24.3% 28.0%
Less travel 6.7% 6.5% 7.0%

About 25% of employees send or answer work-related emails, calls or texts outside of working hours every day

Across all sectors under federal jurisdiction, 25.3% of employees reported sending or answering work-related emails, calls or texts outside of working hours every day (Table 3).Footnote 14 Another 25.0% indicated doing so once or twice a week. The remaining employees selected “once or twice a month” (14.5%), “never” (24.1%), or “not applicable” (11.1%). The sectors where employees were the most likely to send or answer work-related communications outside of working hours every day were banks (30.8%) and telecommunications and broadcasting (28.4%).

Table 3: Frequency of sending or answering work-related communications outside of working hours by sector
Sector Every day Once or twice a week Once or twice a month Never Not applicable
All sectors 25.3% 25.0% 14.5% 24.1% 11.1%
Air transportation 18.2% 25.9% 21.0% 23.6% 11.3%
Rail transportation 22.6% 23.1% 18.0% 24.1% 12.2%
Road transportation 27.2% 20.9% 9.0% 24.7% 18.2%
Maritime transportation 21.2% 22.2% 17.5% 23.1% 16.0%
Courier and pipelines 11.9% 13.3% 11.9% 43.3% 19.5%
Banks 30.8% 28.9% 14.1% 20.6% 5.6%
Feed, flour, seed and grain 19.4% 21.4% 16.8% 29.3% 13.1%
Telecommunications and broadcasting 28.4% 30.2% 16.5% 19.9% 5.0%

Among employees that indicated sending or responding to work-related communications outside of working hours every day, 60.0% said that this was expected by their employer, 23.2% indicated that it was not expected, while 16.8% declared not knowing (Figure 8).Footnote 15 At the same time, 39.1% of employees who sent or answered work-related communications outside of working hours once or twice a week indicated that this was expected by their employer. Another 39.6% indicated that it was not expected, while 21.3% declared that they didn’t know.

Figure 8: Expectation of sending or answering work-related communications outside of working hours by frequency of sending or answering such communications
Figure 8: Expectation of sending or answering work-related communications outside of working hours by frequency of sending or answering such communications - Text description follows
  • Note: Estimates are limited to employees who reported sending or answering work-related emails, calls or texts outside working hours every day, once or twice a week or once or twice a month.
Figure 8: text version
Frequency of sending or answering work-related communications outside working hours / Expectation of employers Yes No Don't know
Every day 60.0% 23.2% 16.8%
Once or twice a week 39.1% 39.6% 21.3%
Once or twice a month 32.8% 48.3% 18.8%
  • Note: The first cell contains the names for both rows and columns, separated by a slash.

Majority of women and men enjoy their job

Across the federal jurisdiction, 77.8% of employees “somewhat agree” or “strongly agree” that they enjoy their job with percentages varying from 70.7% of employees in courier services and pipelines to 81.4% in maritime transportation (Figure 9).Footnote 16 Another 13.6% of employees indicated that they “neither agree nor disagree”, while 8.5% declared that they “somewhat disagree” or “strongly disagree”. Turning to the results by gender, 81.9% of women indicated that they “somewhat agree” or “strongly agree” that overall, they enjoy their job, compared to 75.6% of men.

Figure 9: Share of employees that "somewhat agree" or "strongly agree" that they enjoy their job overall by sector and gender
Figure 9: Share of employees that somewhat agree or strongly agree that they enjoy their job overall by sector and gender - Text description follows
Figure 9: text version
Sector Men and Women Men Women
All sectors 77.8% 75.6% 81.9%
Air transportation 76.0% 73.7% 81.1%
Rail transportation 74.2% 73.7% 77.4%
Road transportation 75.5% 74.1% 81.3%
Maritime transportation 81.4% 80.9% 83.1%
Courier and pipelines 70.7% 68.5% 78.6%
Banks 81.0% 78.6% 83.2%
Feed, flour, seed and grain 81.0% 79.9% 84.0%
Telecommunications and broadcasting 79.8% 79.7% 80.1%

Employees that responded “somewhat disagree” or “strongly disagree” were presented with a list of reasons for which they may not enjoy their job (Figure 10). The 3 most prevalent reasons selected by employees were underpaid (43.9%), relationship with management (39.4%) and heavy workload (34.5%).Footnote 17

Figure 10: Reasons for not enjoying job
Figure 10: Reasons for not enjoying job - Text description follows
  • Note 1: Estimates are limited to employees who reported that they “somewhat disagree” or “strongly disagree” that overall, they enjoy their job.
  • Note 2: Employees were able to give multiple valid responses. Proportions therefore represent the percentage of Yes responses for a given question independent of other questions, and do not sum to 100%.
Figure 10: text version
Reasons for not enjoying one's job Share of employees who selected the reason
Underpaid 43.9%
Relationship with management 39.4%
Heavy workload 34.5%
Few opportunities to grow 27.1%
Overall corporate culture 26.4%
Little recognition by management 24.8%
Unable to achieve work-life balance 20.5%
Bored and unchallenged by the work itself 16.5%
Lack of resources to do the job 14.8%
Health and safety issues at the workplace 10.5%
Relationship with coworkers 10.1%
Lacking the right tools to do the job 7.1%
Other 7.9%

Data source, methods, and notes to the reader

Data source and methods

The data source used for this report is the 2022 Survey of Employees under Federal Jurisdiction (SEFJ). The survey was conducted by Statistics Canada on behalf for the Labour Program of Employment and Social Development Canada. The aim of the survey was to collect data on the working conditions of employees working in federally regulated workplaces. Topics covered include: work hours, health and safety, work-life balance, exposure to workplace harassment and discrimination, as well as access to leaves, benefits, flexible work arrangements, and collective bargaining coverage. Statistics Canada distributed the survey to 37,500 employees in early 2022 (January to March). About 19,060 employees responded to the survey.

The survey targeted employees working for employers covered by Part III of the Canada Labour Code. Part III of the Canada Labour Code covers approximately 6% of employees in Canada. This includes employees working in the following 8 sectors: air transportation; rail transportation; road transportation; maritime transportation; courier services and pipelines; banks; feed, flour, seed and grain; and telecommunications and broadcasting. Henceforth, the terminology "federal jurisdiction" (FJ) is used to refer to these sectors. The survey did not collect data from employees working in various miscellaneous activities outside of these 8 sectors, such as certain federal Crown and shared governance corporations, federally regulated mines and companies engaged in the management of fisheries. First Nation band councils and related activities were also not included.

Notes to the reader

  1. The sample frame for the SEFJ was constructed using lists of employees known to work at establishments under federal jurisdiction. These lists were either provided by employers or derived from administrative data sources such as tax data. For some employers, employee lists were either not provided or they were not usable, which was a source of under coverage for the frame. This under coverage was most significant among large establishments in the postal wing of the courier services and pipeline sector and establishments in the rail transportation sector. It is a potential source of bias when calculating estimates within those domains. In addition, due to the under coverage of postal services and, consequently, the much larger contribution of courier services, the sector was renamed to "courier services and pipelines" from its original "postal services and pipelines".
  2. The pipeline industry is combined with the courier industry because it has a relatively small number of employees. Given limitations on sample size, statistics reported for this sector alone would likely conflict with Statistics Canada's confidentiality and data quality requirements for reporting statistics.
  3. The estimates presented in this report are based on valid responses only, invalid responses have been excluded.
  4. Where relevant, estimates may not sum to exactly 100% due to rounding.
  5. The SEFJ included questions on both sex at birth and gender. This report uses the variable "gender", which is consistent with the approach used in the most recent Census of Population. Given that the gender-diverse category did not have a sufficient size to be reported, gender-diverse responses were randomly aggregated among the binary gender categories by Statistics Canada. Respondents who declined to provide a response to the question "What is your gender" are treated as non-responses and are therefore excluded from the results reported by gender.

Page details

Date modified: