Archived: Departmental Performance Report 2014–15, Environment Canada, chapter 3


Section II: Analysis of Programs by Strategic Outcomes

Strategic Outcome 1: Canada’s natural environment is conserved and restored for present and future generations

Strategic Outcome 2: Canadians are equipped to make informed decisions on changing weather, water and climate conditions

Strategic Outcome 3: Threats to Canadians and their environment from pollution are minimized

Internal Services

Strategic Outcome 1: Canada’s natural environment is conserved and restored for present and future generations.

Performance Measurement
Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Percentage of terrestrial area protectedFootnote 4 as a measure of conservation effort 17% by December 2020Footnote 5

10.3% as of December 31, 2014

Canada's terrestrial protected area, as defined under the International Union for Conservation of Nature, has steadily increased from 5.2% (522,182 km2) in 1990 to 10.3% (1,026,682 km2) in 2014.

Although the 2014 estimate is slightly smaller than the total reported last year (10.4% or 1,037,798 km2), terrestrial protected area has in fact grown by an estimated 1,913 km2 in calendar year 2014. The discrepancy is due to improvements in the methods used to estimate the area protected, which has eliminated double-counting of the area of sites with multiple types of protection.

Program 1.1: Biodiversity - Wildlife and Habitat

Program Description

This program aims to prevent biodiversity loss while still enabling sustainable use by conserving and managing migratory birds; protecting and recovering species at risk; and monitoring, conserving, restoring and rehabilitating significant habitats. The program works toward these goals by establishing and maintaining a network of protected areas and stewardship programs. It also aims to ensure coordinated and coherent national assessment, planning and action to protect biodiversity, including viable populations of species, healthy and diverse ecosystems, and genetic resources. The program forms strategic partnerships for integrated management of Canada's natural capital, including stewardship and the sustainable management of landscapes. This program has responsibilities under the Species at Risk Act; the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994; the Canada Wildlife Act; and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act. International responsibilities include the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (1992), the Migratory Birds Convention, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna Working Group of the Arctic Council, and the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, especially as Waterfowl Habitat (known as the Ramsar Convention). Contributions in support of Biodiversity - Wildlife and Habitat are used as a component of this program.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars) Table note a
2014-15
Main Estimates
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Total Authorities
Available for Use
2014-15
Actual Spending
(authorities used)
Difference
(actual minus planned)
91,592,394 91,592,394 143,284,612 140,408,483 48,816,089
Human Resources (Full-Time Equivalents - FTEs) Table note a.1
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
548 600 52

Performance Results

Program 1.1: Biodiversity - Wildlife and Habitat
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Populations of wildlife, in particular migratory birds and federally-listed species at risk are maintained or restored Proportion of assessed migratory bird species in General Status Reports whose status is considered to be secure 81% in 2015 General Status Report

77% in 2010

Data for this indicator are derived from assessments of the status of species in Canada (General Status Reports) that are prepared every 5 years as required by the Species at Risk Act. This indicator focuses only on migratory bird species, to align with Environment Canada's responsibilities. 

Previous values of the indicator were 81% in 2005 and 80% in 2000. The number of species ranked as “At Risk” is showing a steady increase and has almost doubled since the first report in 2000. Changes in the indicator value may be due to: changes in the population size, distribution of or threats to the species, or a more detailed assessment prepared by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, among other factors.

The indicator value will be updated next year based on the 2015 General Status Report, expected to be released in Fall 2016.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

In 2014-15, Environment Canada started to implement the National Conservation Plan, which includes investments in three priority areas:

Conserving Canada’s lands and waters - investments include:

Restoring Canada’s ecosystems - investments include:

Connecting Canadians to nature - investments include:

The Department also continued development of integrated geospatial datasets and maps that identify zones of interest for species at risk and migratory birds, with regional data. When completed, this information will support and inform conservation planning and activities and improve delivery of departmental programs by integrating and focusing conservation priorities.

Environment Canada continued to support polar bear conservation in Canada and internationally. Domestic highlights included supporting the establishment of a voluntary agreement on harvest levels for the Southern Hudson Bay subpopulation of polar bears. Internationally, conservation work focused on leadership of the range states Circumpolar Action Plan to be published in 2015.

Sub-Program 1.1.1: Biodiversity Policy and Priorities

Sub-Program Description

This program enables Environment Canada to play a national leading role in engaging stakeholders, provincial and territorial governments, and other federal government departments in Canada’s implementation of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. The program provides scientific expertise, guidance and advice to decision-makers, and develops and applies models for social, cultural and economic valuation of ecosystem services to support sustainable development decision making. This work enables information about the ecosystem and the environmental effects of development proposals to be factored into decisions across different levels of government, environmental and non-governmental organizations, the industrial sector, research community and the general public. Strategies used in Canada include the Canadian Biodiversity Strategy, Biodiversity Outcomes Framework, and Access and Benefit Sharing of Genetic Resources. Canada also participates internationally in the Convention on Biological Diversity; the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing of Genetic Resources; the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety; and Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna under the Arctic Council. The program also serves as the Canadian lead and national focal point for the United Nations-sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Program funding includes Canada’s annual contribution to the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and support for international working groups.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
2,454,400 2,976,245 521,845
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
14 15 1

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.1.1: Biodiversity Policy and Priorities
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Biodiversity goals and targets are integrated into federal, provincial and territorial strategies and plans that have an impact on biodiversity Percentage of federal departments with natural resource or environmental mandates, provinces and territories that have identified and are implementing measures to enhance biodiversity 100% by September 2014

100% as of March 2015

Environment Canada invited all federal departments with natural resource or environmental mandates, and all provinces and territories, to identify the plans, strategies and major actions underway related to biodiversity conservation and sustainable use. This information was collected in late 2013 and early 2014 as part of the process to develop Canada’s Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity.

The National Report includes recent examples from every jurisdiction of measures being implemented in support of the (then draft) 2020 biodiversity targets for Canada. The target is therefore considered to have been met.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 1.1.2: Species at Risk

Sub-Program Description

The purpose of this program is to ensure implementation of the Species at Risk Act (SARA). SARA is a key federal government commitment to prevent wildlife species from becoming extinct and to secure the necessary actions for their recovery. It provides for publication of recovery documents, legal protection of wildlife species, and reporting on progress. This is achieved in part through funding programs such as the Habitat Stewardship Program, Aboriginal Fund for Species at Risk and Interdepartmental Recovery Fund. The program relies on partnerships with provincial, territorial and other governments, as well as Aboriginal peoples and other organizations (e.g., environmental organizations, industry associations, etc.). A number of advisory bodies and committees have been established to enable key partners to engage in this program. Authority for the program is based on SARA and Canada’s obligations under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
45,681,501 56,338,092 10,656,591
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
220 265 45

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.1.2: Species at Risk
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Status of listed species shows improvement upon reassessment Proportion of federally-listed species at risk, for which recovery is feasible, that exhibit, at the time of reassessment by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), population and distribution trends consistent with achieving the objectives of recovery strategies To be determined

36% as of May 2014 (most recently available data)

Of the 133 species at risk for which Environment Canada has federal responsibility and that have final recovery strategies or management plans, 33 have population-oriented goals and have had a reassessment since final documents were released, allowing for the evaluation of whether trends in population numbers and distribution are consistent with recovery goals.

Of these 33 species, 12 (36%) have current population trends that are consistent with the goals laid out in the recovery strategies, and 11 (33%) show trends that are inconsistent with goals. Another 4 (12%) have both some indication of improvement and some indication of decline. For the remaining 6 species (18%), there are insufficient data to determine trends.

The previous year’s indicator value was slightly lower (33%) but there are not enough data to determine whether the situation is improving. A target has been established for 2015-16.

Critical habitat is protected

Percentage of Threatened and Endangered species at risk for which Environment Canada is responsible:

(i) whose critical habitat occurs wholly or in part within federal protected areas with that critical habitat described in the Canada Gazette;

(ii) whose critical habitat occurs wholly or in part on other federal lands with that habitat legally protected;

(iii) whose critical habitat occurs wholly or in part on non-federal lands with an assessment that the habitat is protected.

To be determined

(i) 53%, (ii) 12%, (iii) 0%, as of March 31, 2015

This indicator tracks the implementation of legal protection of critical habitat for species at risk for which Environment Canada has primary federal responsibility. The three parts of the indicator correspond to different legal mechanisms for protection, depending on the ownership of the land where critical habitat was identified.

For critical habitat that occurs wholly or in part in federal protected areas, 53% (9 of 17 species) have had that habitat identified and thereby protected, including 3 in 2014-15. For critical habitat on other federal lands, legal protection has been provided for 12% (3 of 25 species), of which one was in 2014-15. For critical habitat that occurs wholly or in part on non-federal lands, no assessments on whether the habitat is protected have been completed since the Species at Risk Act was proclaimed.

This is the first year of reporting on this indicator. Targets have been established for 2015-16.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 1.1.2.1: Species at Risk Operations

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program provides the basic components of Environment Canada’s Species at Risk program. It supports decisions by the Minister to add, reclassify or remove species listed under the Species at Risk Act. For species for which Environment Canada is responsible and that are listed as extirpated, endangered or threatened, the program prepares recovery strategies and action plans (including the identification of critical habitat). It also completes management plans for species of special concern and evaluates populations and threats to listed species. The program supports other federal departments, such as Fisheries and Oceans Canada, in implementing priority recovery strategies, management, and action plans in federal lands and waters, and for federal species as identified in recovery documents. It also supports cooperative arrangements with provinces and territories to implement recovery actions consistent with the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk and bilateral agreements resulting from the Act. The program is also responsible for general administration of the Act (including an annual report to Parliament, issuance of permits under the Act, support for the National Aboriginal Council on Species at Risk and the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, and maintenance of a public registry). The program fulfills Canada’s obligations under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora by effective implementation of the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act, which controls the import, export and movement within Canada of endangered species, ensuring no species are threatened by international trade.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
30,679,153 36,374,004 5,694,851
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
208 250 42

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.1.2.1: Species at Risk Operations
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Publicly available recovery strategies or management plans are in place for all listed species for which Environment Canada is responsible Percentage of listed wildlife species for which Environment Canada is responsible with a recovery strategy or management plan that is posted as proposed or final on the Species at Risk public registry within legislative timeframes 100% by March 2018

61% as of March 31, 2015

Environment Canada is responsible for 334 listed species. Of these, 205 (61%) have proposed or final recovery strategies or management plans posted on the Species at Risk Public Registry. This is an increase from 145 (44%) at the end of 2013-14 and progress is considered to be on track for meeting the target.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 1.1.2.2: Aboriginal Fund for Species at Risk

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program supports the delivery of Environment Canada’s obligations under the Species at Risk Act by funding projects led by Aboriginal organizations and Aboriginal communities across Canada. Collaboration with Aboriginal peoples is key to the protection of species at risk, to the Species at Risk Program results, and to meeting the Department’s core obligations. The funded projects build Aboriginal knowledge and expertise in dealing with species at risk. This enables Aboriginal peoples to actively participate in the conservation and recovery of listed species under the Act, and to protect and recover critical habitat or habitat important for species at risk on First Nations reserves, or on land and waters traditionally used by Aboriginal peoples.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
2,412,023 3,645,012 1,232,989
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
4 5 1

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.1.2.2: Aboriginal Fund for Species at Risk
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Participation in programs to conserve and protect species at risk on Aboriginal lands Number of organizations receiving project funding 75 by March 2015

Species at Risk Stream: 75 in 2014-15

Prevention Stream: 17 in 2014-15

This indicator is a measure of Aboriginal engagement in activities that protect or conserve habitats for species at risk, one of the main objectives of the program. The Prevention Stream was established in 2014, under the National Conservation Plan, to foster stewardship projects aimed at preventing wildlife species, other than species at risk, from becoming a conservation concern on Aboriginal lands across Canada. In comparing to previous years, only the Species at Risk Stream is applicable. The number of organizations receiving funding has remained relatively stable in recent years (66 in 2013-14; 72 in 2012-13). Values for previous years reflect the most recent available data and thus may not be identical to those reported in prior Departmental Performance Reports. In 2014-15, the target was met.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 1.1.2.3: Habitat Stewardship Program

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program supports the delivery of Environment Canada’s obligations under the Species at Risk Act by funding projects aimed at the protection or conservation of habitats for species listed under the Act as “at risk” (endangered, threatened or of special concern), mainly on non-Aboriginal land. This program engages Canadians in conservation activities to conserve biodiversity, promote the participation of local communities with the recovery of species at risk, and prevent other species from becoming a conservation concern. It allocates funds to a variety of partners (non-governmental organizations, community groups, Aboriginal organizations and communities, private corporations, educational institutions, provincial, territorial and municipal governments, and Crown corporations) to meet regional and national priorities.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
12,590,325 16,319,076 3,728,751
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
8 10 2

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.1.2.3: Habitat Stewardship Program
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Important habitat is secured, protected, improved and/or restored to enhance the recovery of species at risk

Total land area that has been improved or restored to benefit wildlife in:

(i) hectares; and

(ii) kilometres of shoreline

(i) 30,000 by March 15

(ii) 300 by March 2015

(i) 10,956 ha in 2013-14

(ii) 136 km in 2013-14

Reported values are for 2013-14 because not all final reports from 2014-15 projects have been submitted by project proponents. Preliminary results for 2014-15 are 23,576 ha and 116 km of shoreline. Results are subject to change as final project reports are being reviewed. 

The target has not been met.

The program is application-based so the projects and subsequently the results are dependent on what activities the recipients have proposed to undertake and, which are completed within the scope of the approved project.

Previous values of the indicator are: 16,183 ha and 66 km of shoreline in 2012-13 and 14,902 ha and 48 km of shoreline in 2011-12. These values are based on the most recent data and may differ from those previously reported.

Important habitat is secured, protected, improved and/or restored to enhance the recovery of species at risk

Total land area (in hectares) that has been:

(i) secured;

(ii) protected (new); or

(iii) protected (renewed)

(i) 5,000 by March 15

(ii) 20,000 by March 2015

(iii) 150,000 by March 2015

(i) 9,142 ha in 2013-14

(ii) 10,386 ha in 2013-14

(iii) 128,765 ha in 2013-14

Reported values are for 2013-14 because not all final reports from 2014-15 projects have been submitted by project proponents. Preliminary results for 2014-15 are 3,221 ha secured; 19,967 ha protected (new); and 23,687 protected (renewed). Results are subject to change as final project reports are reviewed. 

The total land area secured exceeded the target, while the total land area protected (new or renewed) did not. Results achieved are dependent on activities recipients have proposed to undertake and those activities which are completed within the scope of the approved project. Additionally, starting in 2012-13, the program began to shift to multi-year, rather than single-year, agreements. This has led to results being dispersed over multiple years.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 1.1.3: Migratory Birds

Sub-Program Description

This program protects and conserves populations of migratory bird species. It is responsible for implementing the Migratory Birds Convention signed with the U.S. in 1916, via the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994. Activities include conserving populations, individual birds, and their nests and habitats through continued conservation actions, stewardship, policy development, and enforcement of the Act and its regulations. It also protects important bird habitats, minimizes other stressors that affect population status, and manages emergencies regarding health and safety issues associated with migratory birds. The program implements recommendations of the review of migratory bird monitoring programs. It is responsible, as a signatory to the North American Bird Conservation Initiative, for ensuring that all conservation plans for North America’s 12 Bird Conservation Regions, and similarly the 25 Bird Conservation Region Strategies are publicly available, in addition to carrying out actions for priority migratory bird species as indicated by the Bird Conservation Regions plans. The Migratory Birds program is delivered in partnership with other governments and inter-governmental and non-governmental organizations. Client groups include the Canadian public, game bird hunters, Aboriginal people (subsistence harvesting), natural resource economic sectors and natural resource users, and other governments (provincial/territorial and foreign).

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
22,338,409 29,055,547 6,717,138
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
189 193 4

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.1.3: Migratory Birds
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Migratory bird populations maintained at population goals Proportion of migratory bird species for which data is available meeting population goals Performance Measurement Framework target to be determined once bird population goals are agreed upon

57% as of January 2015

This indicator is a measure of Environment Canada's success in meeting its responsibility for the conservation of migratory birds. Population goals and their acceptable bounds are based on either population size or trend, depending on the data available for each species. Populations were assessed against those goals using the best available data for each species. The first goals and assessments were completed in 2014 and the assessment was published in January 2015. Additional details on the current status of individual species and the data sources used to assess the status of those species are provided on the Status of Birds in Canada website. An updated version of this website is scheduled for release in 2015.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 1.1.4: Wildlife Habitat Conservation

Sub-Program Description

The program provides for the protection of priority, unique and rare habitats required for the conservation of migratory birds and species at risk. It provides mechanisms to enter into partnership arrangements with a wide variety of stakeholders and through initiatives to encourage actions by non-governmental organizations and Canadians that conserve and protect wildlife habitat and habitat for species at risk. The program also coordinates the federal government’s response to the Invasive Alien Species Strategy for Canada. Enabling acts include the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994; the Canada Wildlife Act; the Species at Risk Act; and the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (known as the Ramsar Convention). Program delivery includes the assessed contribution to the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Convention).

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
21,118,084 52,038,599 30,920,515
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
126 127 1

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.1.4: Wildlife Habitat Conservation
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Habitats that are needed to achieve waterfowl population goals are secured Land secured by Environment Canada, provinces and territories, and land conservation non-governmental organizations under the North American Waterfowl Management Plan to achieve population goals for all priority waterfowl 9.99 million ha by December 2017

8.07 million ha as of March 2015

The indicator measures the cumulative land area that has been secured in the four Canadian Habitat Joint Ventures (Eastern, Prairie, Canadian Intermountain and Pacific Coast) and the Western Boreal Forest Program Area under the North American Waterfowl Management Plan (NAWMP) from January 1986 to March 2015.

Over 165,000 ha of new habitat (55,000 ha/year) was secured by Canadian NAWMP partners over the 2012 to March 2015 period.

The current target is based on the historical patterns of average yearly securement and is influenced by activities in the Western Boreal Forest Region. During the 2012 to March 2015 reporting period there has not been any land securement in this region and the current rate of growth is not anticipated to be sufficient to meet the December 2017 target.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-program 1.1.4.1: Habitat Conservation Partnerships

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program supports the delivery of Environment Canada’s obligations under the Species at Risk Act, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994, and the Canada Wildlife Act. It does this by funding projects and encouraging activities that secure, protect, improve and/or restore important and ecologically sensitive habitat to enhance the survival of wildlife, and, in particular, species at risk and migratory birds. The program provides mechanisms to engage organizations and individuals, including property owners, environmental organizations and others. It also encourages voluntary action by other levels of government and non-government, Aboriginal groups and private-sector partners through mechanisms such as tax incentives (the Ecological Gifts Program) and funding initiatives. This program also includes Environment Canada’s participation in the implementation of the North American Waterfowl Management Plan, a Canada-U.S.-Mexico partnership of federal, provincial/state and non-governmental organizations that aims to conserve wetlands in North America, and the implementation of the Ramsar Convention. The program also coordinates the federal government’s response to the 2004 Invasive Alien Species Strategy for Canada, which is implemented by federal science-based and regulatory departments and agencies, including the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Natural Resources Canada, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Program delivery includes contributions in support of Biodiversity - Wildlife and Habitat, and those to the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Convention).

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
6,349,148 32,095,420 25,746,272
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
17 18 1

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.1.4.1: Habitat Conservation Partnerships
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Important and ecologically-sensitive habitat is secured, protected, improved and/or restored to enhance the survival of wildlife, in particular species at risk and migratory birds Cumulative total ecologically-sensitive land area (in hectares) secured and protected (Ecological Gifts Program) 159,225 ha by March 2015

170,554 ha as of March 2015

This indicator is a measure of the success of the program in encouraging Canadians to donate land for conservation purposes. "Ecologically sensitive" habitat is identified according to a set of national and provincial/territorial criteria when assessing the validity of a donated gift.

The reported value represents the cumulative habitat secured from the inception of the program in 1996 to March 2015. The land area secured and protected varies from year to year, as it is dependent on decisions by individual Canadian citizens to donate land.

Annual amounts for recent years were: 5,572 ha in 2014-15; 16,926 ha in 2013-14; and 3,922 ha in 2012-13. Several large donations in 2013-14 enabled the program to exceed the target, although this is not considered to be indicative of future trends.

Habitats that are needed to achieve waterfowl population goals are enhanced Total land area by Environment Canada and its partners under the North American Waterfowl Management Plan (NAWMP) to achieve population goals for all priority waterfowl 1,660,867 ha by December 2017

1,439,553 ha as of March 2015

This indicator measures the cumulative land area where enhancement actions were carried out on secured habitats in Canada to increase their carrying capacity for wetland-associated migratory birds and other wildlife, from January 1986 to March 2015. 

Included in the cumulative total is over 78,000 ha of habitat (26,000 ha/year) that was enhanced by Canadian NAWMP partners over the 2012 to March 2015 period.

The current target is based on historical patterns plus a 15% increase. The cost of enhancement activities is significantly lower in some regions, such as the Western Boreal Forest Region, allowing for more land area to be enhanced each year and accelerating progress towards the target. It is not anticipated there will be enough enhancement activity opportunities in areas like the Western Boreal Forest Region to meet the December 2017 target.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 1.1.4.2: Protected Areas

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program supports the delivery of Environment Canada’s obligations under the Species at Risk Act, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994, and the Canada Wildlife Act. This entails managing a network of protected areas (National Wildlife Areas, Migratory Bird Sanctuaries and Marine Wildlife Areas) to protect priority habitats required for the conservation of Canada’s migratory birds and species at risk. The program also manages rare or unique habitats planned to adapt to ecological change, in conjunction with others; facilitates understanding of ecological processes; and promotes public awareness and understanding of nature conservation and Environment Canada’s role in conservation. The program also carries out the strategic planning, coordination and management of protected areas. Program success involves the support of the public and close collaboration with provincial and territorial governments, Aboriginal groups, other wildlife management agencies, other natural resource agencies, non-governmental organizations and property owners in initiatives such as the Inuit Impact and Benefits Agreement, and the Northwest Territories Protected Areas Strategy (to contribute to the further establishment of National Wildlife Areas in Nunavut and the Northwest Territories). The program operates as part of a broader network of protected areas that includes sites of other federal departments (notably Parks Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada), provincial and territorial agencies and conservation properties owned and/or managed by non-governmental organizations. The Department also undertakes research and provides advice to decision makers on marine ecosystems, including impacts of environmental stressors on migratory birds, species at risk and ecological risks associated with specific high-priority ocean activities.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
14,768,936 19,943,179 5,174,243
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
109 109 0

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.1.4.2: Protected Areas
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Habitat for the conservation of migratory birds, species at risk and rare or unique species is protected Total area that is under legally-binding protection as National Wildlife Areas Migratory Bird Sanctuaries and Marine Wildlife 12,448,961 ha by March 2015

12,457,748 ha as of December 31, 2014

This indicator is a measure of the total area of marine and terrestrial National Wildlife Areas and Migratory Bird Sanctuaries managed by Environment Canada that are recognized by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as protected areas. Sixteen Migratory Bird Sanctuaries in mostly urban areas do not meet the IUCN definition, and therefore 5,134 hectares are not included.

Compared to the 2005 value of 11,768,892 ha, the area protected has increased by 5.8% and the target has been exceeded. The total area protected represents an area twice the size of Nova Scotia.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Results of an evaluation of the Protected Areas program confirmed its ongoing relevance and indicated that the program is making progress toward the achievement of many of its intended outcomes. In response to a recommendation of the evaluation, the Department began development of an approach to engage more actively with its stakeholders.

Program 1.2: Water Resources

Program Description

This program addresses the risks to and impacts on water resources from industrial activities, agriculture, climate change and other factors. Its goal is to ensure threats to Canada’s water resources and aquatic ecosystems are minimized, and the sustainability of the resource is maintained. The program is delivered in collaboration with partners that include other federal departments, provinces and territories, and a range of non-governmental organizations. The program focuses on Environment Canada’s contribution to monitoring water quality and conducting water-related research and analysis, and its role in collaborating with other departments to determine priorities for water quality, quantity, and aquatic ecosystem monitoring and research. It provides scientific information and advice to decision-makers. The program supports the implementation of the Canada Water Act, the Action Plan for Clean Water, the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, the Fisheries Act, the International Boundary Waters Treaty Act, and the International River Improvements Act. Contributions in support of Water Resources are used as a component of this program.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)*
2014-15
Main Estimates
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Total Authorities
Available for Use
2014-15
Actual Spending
(authorities used)
Difference
(actual minus planned)
91,196,857 91,196,857 94,498,585 92,453,058 1,256,201
Human Resources (Full-Time Equivalents - FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
743 701 -42

Performance Results

Program 1.2: Water Resources
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Threats to Canada's water resources and aquatic ecosystems are minimized and the sustainability of the resource is maintained Percentage of core national monitoring sites whose water quality is rated as good or excellent 50% of core national monitoring sites in the 2010-12 data set are rated as good or excellent

45% for the period 2010-12

This indicator provides an overall measure of the ability of select rivers across Canada to support aquatic life. Data are collected at a subset of monitoring sites across Canada (core national sites) in 16 drainage regions where human activities result in a high potential for impaired water quality.

Freshwater quality in rivers was excellent or good at 45% of monitoring sites, fair at 37% of sites, marginal at 16% of sites and poor at 2% of sites.

Reported values were calculated using the most recent available data. The delay in reporting is due to the time required to obtain data from provincial and territorial monitoring programs and to complete quality assurance/quality control procedures. For 10 sites, data from late December 2009 or early January 2013 were used to meet requirements for minimum number of samples.   

Owing to changes in the specific stations and monitoring parameters used, care must be taken in comparing indicator values between time periods. An analysis of changes between 2003 and 2012 shows that quality scores improved at 11 monitoring sites, 85 monitoring sites showed no change, and only 4 sites showed a decline in score. The direction of change is thus positive, although the target has not yet been met.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Through water quality and quantity monitoring, Environment Canada continued to support third party water resource managers with data and analysis on water level and flow to help with decision-making for flood prevention and mitigation. The Department also continued to develop a hydrological model to estimate possible river flow scenarios to support both preparation for and response to a flood.

The Department continued to engage with Water Boards on trans-boundary water issues to help inform water resource decision makers meet their inter-jurisdictional obligations. EC undertook a special project in support of the International Joint Commission (IJC) and the International Rainy-Lake of the Woods Watershed Board, supported IJC work on regulating Lake Superior and Lake Ontario, and provided technical expertise on the observed and projected impacts of climate change in the Great Lakes Basin.

Work continued on development of the Department’s climate watch capacity and expansion of seasonal climate outlook forums working with key stakeholders (including emergency measures organizations) for improved and integrated climate-related guidance across the country. Investments in innovations in environmental monitoring were made to support the watershed science community in achieving accurate and cost-effective field methods.

Environment Canada became the lead for development of the binational Canada-U.S. Quarterly Climate Impacts and Outlook Bulletins for the Great Lakes and the Gulf of Maine Regions. The Bulletins summarize the latest season’s weather and water level conditions and related impacts, and provide an outlook for the upcoming season.

Sub-Program 1.2.1: Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystems Health

Sub-Program Description

The program supports the water quality-related obligations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, the Canada Water Act, the Fisheries Act, the International Boundary Waters Treaty Act, and federal/provincial/territorial and Canada-U.S. water quality agreements. The program provides water quality monitoring and reporting, including through annual reports on the Freshwater Quality Index. The program delivers on Environment Canada’s responsibilities under the Lake Winnipeg Basin Initiative, such as scientific monitoring activities and support for initiatives to increase information-sharing and analysis among partners and networks. The program also coordinates with the United States several research and monitoring activities in the Great Lakes under the Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The program collaborates with the Government of Alberta and stakeholders to implement the three-year Joint Canada-Alberta Implementation Plan for Oil Sands Monitoring. The Plan is an industry-funded integrated approach to monitoring, evaluation, and reporting on the significance of environmental contaminant pathways in air and water, biological effects, and impacts of habitat disturbance from the oil sands. The program also monitors water quality in Canadian shellfish growing areas for the Canadian Shellfish Sanitation Program, which is administered jointly by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment Canada, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
68,355,625 63,739,651 -4,615,974
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
506 428 -78

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.2.1: Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystems Health
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Canada's water resource policies and programs are informed by water quality and aquatic ecosystem health data and information from ongoing monitoring of waters under federal jurisdiction or responsibility Percentage of sites within Environment Canada's national core water quality monitoring network at which water quality monitoring was performed

100% of sites monitored annually by

March 2015

100% in 2014

This indicator is a measure of the program's performance in fulfilling its monitoring mandate under the Canada Water Act. Environment Canada's 2014 network of core monitoring sites consists of 215 river sites plus 147 sites from the two Great Lakes under shared Canada-U.S. jurisdiction. Federal-provincial sites are included in the core network and are monitored in accordance with formal agreements with the respective provinces. 

In 2014, monitoring was performed at all 362 core sites. The number of sites in the network varies slightly from year to year, as sites are adjusted according to a risk-based analysis. The Great Lakes are sampled on a rotating basis and not all sites are sampled every year. Sites not scheduled for monitoring for a given year are not included in the indicator calculation. The target was met in 2014 and also in 2013. 

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 1.2.2: Water Resources Management and Use

Sub-Program Description

This program conducts research and monitoring, and advances knowledge on the state of watersheds through the Canadian Council of Ministers on the Environment, in order to support integrated water management decisions at the federal/provincial/territorial levels. It promotes and enables the application of science-based information to inform decision-making in an integrated and coherent manner consistent with the Canada Water Act. The program coordinates water quality and water quantity science and monitoring to inform decisions, policy development and management approaches. The program coordinates with Canadian and U.S. government agencies (e.g., International Joint Commission), and lends expertise to domestic and international water boards on domestic and transboundary issues such as protecting ecosystems, avoiding flooding and providing sufficient flow of water to support economic activities in waterways from Lake Ontario to the St. Lawrence River, Lake Superior to Lake Huron, and in other transboundary rivers.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
2,555,621 3,201,892 646,271
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
29 29 0

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.2.2: Water Resources Management and Use
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Water resource decision-makers have the necessary information and stakeholder perspectives to make responsible and appropriate shared resource decisions Client satisfaction index, on a scale of 1 (unsatisfactory) to 10 (excellent) Target will be set once a baseline value is measured

70% in 2013-14

The indicator is a measure of client satisfaction with the engineering and science support provided by Environment Canada for domestic and international water management boards. The reported value was measured in the context of an evaluation of the program in 2013-14. The final indicator value is calculated as the percentage of respondents rating their satisfaction as 8 out of 10 or higher. The survey was not administered in 2014-15.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 1.2.3: Hydrological Service and Water Survey

Sub-Program Description

Information on the water cycle is critical to Canada’s health and safety (e.g., flood forecasting and prevention) and to economic efficiency (e.g., agriculture, hydroelectricity and international shipping), by collecting and disseminating hydrological data and information to support water management decisions. The hydrological data, meteorological and ancillary information provided through this program are used by international, federal, provincial, territorial and municipal agencies to regulate and respond to changing water levels and flows within Canada, and in bodies of water that cross international boundaries. Under the Canada Water Act, monitoring activities of this program are carried out through cost-shared bilateral agreements between Environment Canada and each of the provinces and territories (Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada represents Nunavut and the Northwest Territories). These agreements create the national framework within which Environment Canada collects, interprets and provides level and flow information, and supports scientific investigations. Delivery of the program involves staff in Environment Canada headquarters and each region. Program delivery may include contributions in support of Water Resources.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
20,285,611 25,511,515 5,225,904
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
208 244 36

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.2.3: Hydrological Service and Water Survey
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Canadians and their institutions have the hydrological data, information and knowledge they need to make water management decisions Client satisfaction index, on a scale of 1 (unsatisfactory) to 10 (excellent) A target has been established for 2017

79% in 2014-15

This program collects, produces and disseminates hydrometric data through cost-shared bilateral agreements between Environment Canada and the provinces and territories. The indicator provides a measure of the satisfaction of provincial and territorial partners with the performance of Water Survey of Canada. Satisfaction is gauged annually (each spring) through the Water Survey of Canada Partner Survey. 

Performance is on track to meet the target in 2017. The reported value is not comparable to that reported in the 2013-14 Departmental Performance Report due to changes in the indicator calculation methods. As the survey is limited to provincial and territorial partners/clients, the indicator value may not represent the views of other data users.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Program 1.3: Sustainable Ecosystems

Program Description

This program aims to sustain Canada’s ecosystems over the long term by providing Canadians, their governments and the private sector with the environmental information and tools required to incorporate social, economic and environmental considerations into decision-making and action. Environmental assessments are a large part of this program. The ecosystem approach to environmental management focuses on maintaining the capacity of a whole system to produce ecological goods and services, such as water resources, air and water quality, and genetic resources to support our economy, security, health and well-being. This program focuses on the development and implementation of Environment Canada’s sustainability policies and strategies, information to support integrated, ecosystem-scale planning, community engagement in remediation of sites, youth engagement, and research and reporting on environmental status and trends. The program facilitates inter-disciplinary and cross-sectoral planning, and information sharing among partners. Contributions in support of Sustainable Ecosystems are used as a component of this program.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Main Estimates
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Total Authorities
Available for Use
2014-15
Actual Spending
(authorities used)
Difference
(actual minus planned)
92,013,642 92,013,642 96,697,210 72,619,888 -19,393,754
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
350 359 9

Performance Results

Program 1.3: Sustainable Ecosystems
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Canadians manage ecosystem resources in a manner consistent with ecosystem sustainability Aggregated score of selected ecosystem indicators across ecosystem initiatives Target to be determined

53 based on Great Lakes data from 1968 to 2010 and St. Lawrence River data from 2002 to 2012.

This indicator is a summary measure of overall condition and health of selected Canadian ecosystems in which the program is directly involved. The reported value is a score between 0 and 100 based on assessments of the status and trends of major ecosystem indicators. At present, it focuses on the four Canadian Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River, although the intention is to add other ecosystems as indicators become available.

Overall, ecosystem indicators are tending to fair status.

Individual ecosystem scores are:

  • Lake Superior 66
  • Lake Huron 59
  • Lake Ontario 50
  • St. Lawrence River 49
  • Lake Erie 42

This is the first time this indicator has been reported. It will be updated periodically as new environmental indicator data are available for the ecosystems.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

In 2014-15, the Department continued to provide an ecosystem approach to environmental management, participating in approximately 150 project assessments over the year, in support of a range of projects across Canada. Environment Canada also continued to work to invest in improving and restoring key Canadian ecosystems (including the Great Lakes, St. Lawrence River, Lake Simcoe/South-east Georgian Bay, Lake Winnipeg and the Okanagan, Salish Sea and Atlantic ecosystems) through monitoring activities, research with partners in Canada and internationally and through funding of projects and activities at the local level. (See also 1.3.4.1 - 1.3.4.5 below).

The Department improved coverage of the goals and targets of the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy, to make the Strategy and related reporting more relevant to federal and external decision-makers. In support of sustainability reporting, four new indicators were added and many others were updated in the Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators to provide a more comprehensive picture of progress toward environmental targets.

Environment Canada played leadership roles and/or participated in a number of initiatives to ensure that environmental considerations are reflected in Canada’s free trade negotiations and agreements. The Department also continued to advance Canada’s international environmental objectives through engagement in international organizations, and through bilateral and regional cooperation agreements.

The Department led the negotiation and development of environment commitments within the recently concluded Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, and the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement. Environment Canada has continued its activities under additional bilateral environment commitments arising from Canada’s free trade agreements with Chile, Costa Rica, Peru, Colombia, Panama, Jordan, and Honduras.

Environment Canada’s engagement in in the United Nations Environment Programme secured the nomination of Canadian experts for the development of the 6th Global Environmental Outlook (GEO-6) Report. As well, strategic engagement at the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development  has continued to provide tools, information, policy and economic analysis in support of the Department’s environmental policy and regulatory agenda.

Through its engagement in the China Council for International Cooperation, the Department provided advice for the Chinese government on environmental matters such as wildlife crime and short-lived climate pollutants. Effective engagement with China and action by China is important for effective global action and important to avoid adverse environmental outcomes in Canada.

Sub-Program 1.3.1: Sustainability Reporting and Indicators

Sub-Program Description

The program works with other government departments, through the Sustainable Development Office to implement the Federal Sustainable Development Act, which mandates Environment Canada to lead the implementation, tracking and reporting of the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (FSDS). The Act requires the Minister of the Environment to develop and implement a federal sustainable development strategy that will make environmental decision-making more transparent and accountable to Parliament. In accordance with the Act, every three years the Strategy is tabled in Parliament setting out the federal sustainable development goals, targets and implementation strategies. In addition, the Sustainable Development Office provides, at least once every three years, a report on the federal government’s progress in implementing the FSDS. Finally, this program supports the responsible federal departments and agencies in developing and tabling their individual strategies to reflect how their program activities will support the FSDS within one year of the tabling of the FSDS in the House of Commons. These strategies support and foster greater transparency and accountability both to the public and Parliament. This program also works with other government departments, through the Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators initiative, to report on environmental indicators that track the progress of the FSDS and issues of concern to Canadians including air quality and climate, water quality and availability, and protecting nature.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
7,844,185 7,294,934 -549,251
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
58 53 -5

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.3.1: Sustainability Reporting and Indicators
Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Increased use of Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators in sustainable development policy and reporting Annual number of external research, policy or media-related publications that adopt as measures in publications or analyses the Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators 70 publications by December 2014

111 in 2014

This indicator measures the use of Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators (CESI) in published analyses. It does not include use of the indicators that is not published or that does not include proper citations.

A comparison of 2013 and 2014 results to previous years indicates a general rise in citations over time, with 2014 showing the largest number of annual citations since 2005, exceeding the target by nearly 60%. This result can be attributed, in part, to the release of three reports from non-governmental organizations that used CESI data in their findings, reports which were further publicized online.

Policies and plans of federal government departments reflect the goals and targets in the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy Percentage of goals, targets and implementation strategies from the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy integrated into annual departmental reporting (e.g., Reports on Plans and Priorities, Departmental Performance Reports) 100% by March 2015

95% in 2014-15

The reported value is based on a review of 2015-16 Reports on Plans and Priorities and 2013-14 Departmental Performance Reports. The review assesses only whether the required information is contained in the reports and does not include consideration of the quality or clarity of the information reported.

The indicator value remains relatively stable from the 94% reported in 2013-14. As the actual value is within 5% of the target it may be considered to have been substantively met.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 1.3.2: Ecosystem Assessment and Approaches

Sub-Program Description

This program contributes to a consolidated activity that ensures the assessment, evaluation and management of Canada’s ecosystems in a sustainable manner. These diverse components provide scientific expertise, guidance and advice to decision-makers across different levels of government, environmental and non-governmental organizations, industry, the research community and the general public. The goal is to ensure that ecosystem information and environmental effects of development proposals can be factored into their decisions. The program conducts research, monitoring, assessment and reporting on the health of ecosystems and biodiversity. It also monitors biodiversity contaminants as part of the Joint Oil Sands Monitoring Implementation Plan in order to provide an improved understanding of the long-term cumulative effects of oil sands development. Environment Canada (EC) participates in federal environmental assessments, including those in the North, and also contributes scientific expertise in territorial and provincial environmental assessments. EC contributes to the health of Canada’s ecosystems through its involvement in these strategic assessments.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
20,906,910 24,029,372 3,122,462
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
184 168 -16

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.3.2: Ecosystem Assessment and Approaches
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Potential significant adverse environmental effects of projects, plans, programs or policies subject to federal environmental assessment legislation and Cabinet Directives are avoided or mitigated Proportion of Environment Canada recommendations that are incorporated into final environmental assessment decisions 60% by March 2015

74% in 2014-15

The reported value for 2014-15 is based on two projects-Northern Gateway Pipeline and Site C Clean Energy-that were approved under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act in 2014-15. The indicator does not take into account recommendations that were agreed upon by the proponent during the environmental assessment review process.

An estimated 40 out of 54 recommendations were reflected in the final environmental assessment, either fully or partially. Performance on this indicator has therefore exceeded the target. The indicator was reported only once previously, in 2013-14, where the program achieved 65% based on 3 projects.

Potential significant adverse environmental effects of projects, plans, programs or policies subject to federal environmental assessment legislation and Cabinet Directives are avoided or mitigated Proportion of environmental assessment follow-up requests made by Environment Canada which perform as anticipated 100% by fiscal year 2016-17

100% in 2014-15

This indicator is a measure of the extent to which project proponents are responding adequately to address follow-up requests as stated in environment assessment decisions. The reported value is based on all projects that are considered to be active in the follow-up phase and for which the Department has received or anticipates receiving follow-up reports from the proponent.

The value of the indicator in 2012-13 and in 2013-14 was also 100% and thus the target has been met for three consecutive years.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 1.3.3: Community Engagement

Sub-Program Description

This program engages Canadians and communities in protecting and restoring the environment through behavioural change, capacity building, community-based funding programs and engagement activities.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
9,803,400 9,354,751 -448,649
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
27 18 -9

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.3.3: Community Engagement
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Increased engagement of Canadians in individual and collective activities to protect, conserve or restore the natural environment Number of Canadians engaged in individual and collective actions to protect, conserve or restore the natural environment 400,000 by March 2015

198,376 in 2014-15

This indicator is a measure of engagement of Canadians through the EcoAction Community Funding program, the Environmental Damages Fund and the Environmental Youth Employment program.

Previous reported values for this indicator were 214,063 in 2012-13 and 183,792 in 2013-14. Increases in the numbers engaged through EcoAction in 2014-15 were offset by decreases elsewhere. The target has been adjusted for 2015-16 to reflect changes in the program.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

See also sub-sub programs 1.3.3.1 to 1.3.3.3 for more information.

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.3.1: EcoAction Community Funding

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This community funding program was established to provide financial support to not-for-profit and non-governmental organizations for projects that have measurable positive impacts on the environment. Projects funded by EcoAction protect, rehabilitate or enhance the environment, and build the capacity of communities and individuals to sustain these activities in the future. Projects are funded in one of four priority areas: clean air, climate change, clean water or nature. EcoAction projects require the involvement of members of the community, including volunteers, to ensure that projects are successful.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
6,427,239 5,944,661 -482,578
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
21 14 -7

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.3.1: EcoAction Community Funding
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Funded projects achieve their planned goals for nature conservation, clean water and/or climate change Percentage of aggregate project environmental goals achieved 100% by March 2015

128% in 2014-15

The reported value represents forecasted results based on incomplete reporting from projects, so final results may differ. The value for 2012-13 was 115%.

Actual results achieved by projects may exceed original goals for various reasons, including proponents obtaining additional funding from other partners or uncertainties in identifying planned goals.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.3.2: Environmental Damages Fund

Sub-Sub-Program Description

The Environmental Damages Fund (EDF) was created in 1995 to manage funds received as compensation for environmental damages. Funds may come from fines, court-ordered payments, out-of-court settlements and voluntary payments. This program’s goal is to improve the quality of Canada’s natural environment. Funds are disbursed in the geographic region where the original incident occurred if possible and are used to finance projects that focus on environmental restoration. The latter includes research, development, education and awareness, environmental quality improvement and compliance with environmental regulations. Eligible recipients include non-governmental organizations, universities and academic institutions, Aboriginal groups, and provincial, territorial and municipal governments. Partners include Transport Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and Parks Canada.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
222,420 272,107 49,687
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
4 2 -2

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.3.2: Environmental Damages Fund
Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Recognition by judges of the value of the Environmental Damages Fund (EDF) to restore environmental damage or harm to wildlife Annual number of court awards directing payment to the EDF via non-directed legislation 10 by March 2015

5 in 2014-15

This indicator is a measure of the recognition by the legal community of the value of the EDF, due in part to targeted promotion of the program. The indicator is limited to non-directed legislation, that is, legislation where awards are at the discretion of judges and are not automatically directed to the EDF.

The number of awards from non-directed legislation has been fluctuating due to increased use of the EDF, but is now trending downward because of the increased number of statutes that automatically direct funds to the EDF.

Natural environments affected by environmental damage are restored Proportion of the area affected that is restored 100% by March 2015

100% in 2014-15

This indicator compares the percentage of area proposed for restoration in project proposals with the area reported to have been restored in the project final reports.

The reported value for 2014-15 is based on one project, which was the only project funded during the year which used this indicator to report on results.

Beginning in 2015-16, the indicator will be revised to report on the total area restored.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.3.3: Environmental Youth Employment

Sub-Sub-Program Description

Environment Canada manages two youth employment initiatives, International Environmental Youth Corps (IEYC) and Science Horizons, under the Careers Focus stream of the federal Youth Employment Strategy led by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada.Footnote 6 Consistent with Environment Canada’s mandate to promote the integration of the economic, social and environmental aspects of sustainable development, the youth employment initiatives offer opportunities to unemployed and under-employed Canadian youth to gain work experience in the environmental sector. The IEYC offers approximately 130 intern placements in the environment sector per year, which last six to 12 months. IEYC funding is allocated equitably across Canada. Care is taken to ensure all regions of the country benefit from IEYC funding. In collaboration with universities, non-governmental organizations and industry, Science Horizons offers approximately 100 internships, lasting from six to 12 months, to youths working on environmental science projects allocated across Canada each year.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
3,153,741 3,137,983 -15,758
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
2 2 0

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.3.3: Environmental Youth Employment
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Experienced youth are employed in the environmental sector or seek higher education Percentage of youth participants that either obtain full-time employment in their field or that return to continue education following completion of their internship or placement 80% by March 2015

80% in 2014-15

Previous values of the indicator were 81% in 2013-14 and 88% in 2012-13. The target has thus been met for the past three consecutive years.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 1.3.4: Ecosystems Initiatives

Sub-Program Description

This program advances implementation of an ecosystem approach by providing coordination and oversight for ecosystem initiatives. It responds to growing interest in achieving measurable environmental progress by developing non-regulatory tools and moving beyond jurisdictional concerns. The program seeks to establish and support shared governance mechanisms, as well as to implement grants and contributions programs for clean-up and community projects. It also seeks to manage administrative or other types of funding arrangements as well as partnerships with provinces, the U.S. government, Aboriginal groups or regional stakeholders.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
53,459,147 31,940,831 -21,518,316
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
81 120 39

Performance Results

Sub-Program 1.3.4: Ecosystems Initiatives
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Environment Canada and partners achieve near-term objectives for environmental improvements in ecosystems of national significance Estimated progress achieved against near-term goals identified in the federal-provincial agreements respecting ecosystem initiatives

Great Lakes: 100% by March 2018

St. Lawrence: 100% by March 2016

Great Lakes: Results are not available at this time.

Negotiations were finalized in 2014 and the new Canada-Ontario Agreement on Great Lakes Water Quality and Ecosystem Health became effective December 18, 2014. Reporting on the Great Lakes portion of the indicator will resume once the Canada-Ontario Agreement work plan is finalized.

St. Lawrence: 89% as of March 2015

Of the 47 planned projects in the Joint Action Program for 2014-15, 89% are proceeding as planned, while 11% are experiencing minor difficulties. No projects are facing major difficulties which would place implementation of the project at risk. In comparison, at the end of 2013-14, 76% of projects were proceeding as planned, 16% were experiencing minor difficulties and 8% were facing major difficulties. If the current trends continue, the target is expected to be achieved in 2016.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

For more information about the work carried out in major ecosystems, see sub-programs 1.3.4.1 to 1.3.4.5, below.

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.4.1: Great Lakes

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program provides leadership, oversight, coordination, funding and governance mechanisms for the Great Lakes Basin Ecosystem Initiative by managing, delivering and reporting on the Canada-U.S. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA), the Canada-Ontario Agreement (COA), the Great Lakes Nutrient Initiative, the Great Lakes Action Plan (GLAP) and Action Plan for Clean Water (Great Lakes sediment remediation implementation). Work encompasses policy development, issues management, work planning, reporting, co-ordination of science and monitoring, and the development, implementation and analysis of agreements, plans and initiatives. The program achieves results in collaboration with other federal departments and other levels of government in both Canada and the U.S., Aboriginal groups, conservation authorities and watershed management agencies, municipalities, environmental organizations and stewardship networks. Specifically, this program implements Remedial Action Plans and Lakewide Action and Management Plans to improve environmental quality and achieve the vision of a healthy, and prosperous Great Lakes ecosystem. It uses targeted funding from the GLAP to restore beneficial use impairments in Areas of Concern, and implements contaminated sediment remediation projects with funding from the Action Plan for Clean Water. Funding from the Great Lakes Nutrient Initiative is used to determine phosphorus targets and identify possible actions to reduce levels that contribute to harmful algae. The program also develops action plans and strategies to address evolving and historic issues of emerging concern in the Great Lakes. These issues include species and habitat protection, chemicals of concern to Canada and the U.S., and the identification of climate change impacts on Great Lakes water quality. The program also regularly reports federally and provincially through the COA and bi-nationally through the Canada-U.S. GLWQA. Reporting includes the State of the Great Lakes reports on environmental indicators, the Progress Report of the Parties (Canada-U.S.), updates on Lakewide Action and Management Plans, COA Progress Reports, and a report on Groundwater science.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
38,758,943 16,916,951 -21,841,992
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
60 92 32

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.4.1: Great Lakes
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Environment Canada and partners achieve near-term objectives for improvements in beneficial use impairments and environmental quality of the Great Lakes Basin ecosystem Number of beneficial uses whose status is listed as “impaired” or “requires further assessment” for Canada’s 17 Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes Zero Great Lakes Areas of Concern beneficial uses listed as "impaired" or "requires further assessment" by 2030

103 as of March 2015

To date, 55 beneficial use impairments have been restored to "not impaired" status. Efforts continue to confirm the impairment status of 23 beneficial uses identified as "requiring further assessment" and to restore the current 80 beneficial use impairments.

Overall, environmental quality in the 17 Great Lakes Areas of Concern (AOCs) has improved since the restoration program began in 1987. To date, three Canadian AOCs have been officially delisted: Collingwood Harbour, Severn Sound, and Wheatley Harbour. All remedial actions have been completed in an additional two Canadian AOCs: Spanish Harbour and Jackfish Bay, although additional time is required for the environment in these AOCs to recover.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

In 2014-15, the Department continued its long-standing collaboration with the U.S. and Ontario to restore, protect and conserve the Great Lakes. Environment Canada:

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.4.2: St. Lawrence

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program provides leadership, oversight and coordination to the overall governance of the St. Lawrence Action Plan, and reports results achieved between the Government of Canada and the Government of Quebec. It works to establish cooperative partnerships between the federal and provincial governments to address biodiversity conservation, water quality improvement and sustainability of beneficial uses. It also supports stakeholder participation in collaboration processes and communities in improving environmental quality through grants and contribution agreements. The program conducts and coordinates prediction and monitoring activities in the St. Lawrence with other federal and provincial departments, and releases reports regularly on the State of the St. Lawrence and factsheets on 21 environmental indicators, as well as results of the St. Lawrence Action Plan.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
2,759,827 2,981,842 222,015
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
6 8 2

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.4.2: St. Lawrence
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Environment Canada and partners achieve near-term objectives for improvements in water quality, biodiversity conservation and beneficial uses in the St. Lawrence ecosystem Average number of participating external organizations per project funded by Environment Canada under the St. Lawrence Action Plan 3 by March 2016

3.9 in 2014-15

Within the 21 projects funded under the Community Interaction Program, the number of partners contributing varies between 2 and 12. This is similar to previous years.

In the Areas of Prime Concern (ZIP - Zones d’intervention prioritaire) program, the 15 signed contribution agreements involve a total of 215 partners. This shows an increase over time from 140 in 2012-13 and 213 in 2013-14.

Contributions from the Government of Quebec via the Ministry of Sustainable Development, Environment and the Fight against Climate Change have allowed for the implementation of 23 projects, in collaboration with four provincial ministries and some 67 organizations.

Environment Canada and partners achieve near-term objectives for improvements in water quality, biodiversity conservation and beneficial uses in the St. Lawrence ecosystem Funds contributed by non-federal government organizations per dollar contributed by Environment Canada to projects under the St. Lawrence Action Plan 3.5 by March 2016

$3.76 in 2014-15

This indicator is a measure of the success in attracting contributions from external organizations to projects under the Community Interaction Program. The target has been exceeded.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.4.3: Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program provides financial and technical support through the Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay Clean-Up Fund to implement priority projects through contributions to citizens, non-governmental organizations, provincial ministries, conservation authorities, landowners, universities and industry. The Fund also supports key research within federal departments. Priority objectives of the Fund are to support projects which improve monitoring, assessment and information required to improve decision-making for phosphorus reduction strategies; conserve critical aquatic habitat and associated species through targeted aquatic habitat protection, restoration and creation; reduce rural and urban non-point sources of nutrients including implementation of Best Management Practices for the management of soil, crops, livestock, etc. and creating and rehabilitating wetlands and naturalizing watercourses; and, reduce discharges of phosphorus from point sources including sewage, combined sewer overflows and urban storm water systems including support to development and testing of innovative approaches to manage urban storm water and wastewater. The initiative is administered by Environment Canada’s Lake Simcoe/South-Eastern Georgian Bay office in consultation with Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, the Province of Ontario, Lake Simcoe Conservation Authority and other key stakeholders. Program investments are expected to improve water quality for recreational use, substantially reduce phosphorus loads from urban and rural sources, and advance the restoration of a sustainable cold-water fishery, as well as ecological integrity. This initiative is a key component of the Government’s Action Plan for Clean Water and supports commitments of the federal government related to the Canada-United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
7,510,838 7,617,225 106,387
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
5 10 5

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.4.3: Lake Simcoe/South-eastern Georgian Bay
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Environment Canada and partners achieve reductions in phosphorus loads and restoration and protection of fish and aquatic dependent wildlife populations of Lake Simcoe and South-eastern Georgian Bay Estimated annual reductions in phosphorus inputs to the Lake Simcoe and South-eastern Georgian Bay watersheds due to projects supported by the program 4,000 kg by March 2017

1,325 kg as of March 31, 2015

The reported value represents Round 1 projects approved in 2013-14 and Round 2 projects approved in 2014-15 that were completed or partially completed (multi-year) during those fiscal years.

Results from Round 1 and Round 2 multi-year projects are not yet available, as many of the projects are completing end-of-year reports or are multi-year projects with final reports due in future years.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.4.4: Lake Winnipeg

Sub-Sub-Program Description

The Lake Winnipeg Basin Initiative focuses on three key areas: science (research, information and monitoring); transboundary partnerships; and the implementation and administration of the Lake Winnipeg Basin Stewardship Fund. This Fund supports projects to improve water quality by identifying, assessing, and addressing key issues such as pollutants and nutrient loads in the lake and its contributing watershed. National science and governance initiatives, aligned to the Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystems Health program (1.2.1), also support the Lake Winnipeg Basin Initiative. The Lake Winnipeg Basin Office coordinates and manages the activities of the Lake Winnipeg Basin Initiative. It works with existing water governance bodies; explores options and opportunities to cooperatively develop, and support implementation of a basin-wide nutrient strategy; and provides a forum for communication. This includes working with the Province of Manitoba to continue implementation of the Canada-Manitoba Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Respecting Lake Winnipeg, which provides for a long-term collaborative and coordinated approach between the two governments to ensure the sustainability and health of the Lake Winnipeg Basin. The program also financially supports the ongoing development and expansion of the single-window Web information portal, housed at the University of Manitoba, to better promote and enable data sharing and analysis with partners and other networks, in order to support research on Lake Winnipeg.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
2,162,272 2,165,426 3,154
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
6 6 0

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.4.4: Lake Winnipeg
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Reduced nutrient loading in the Lake Winnipeg basin Estimated reduction of phosphorus load in the Lake Winnipeg basin resulting from projects funded by the Lake Winnipeg Basin Stewardship Fund 10,800 kg by March 2017

8,316 kg as of March 31, 2015

The reported value is the sum of reductions reported by Phase II projects in their final reports, as estimated using standard, scientifically-derived formulas.

In addition to the reported amount, projects still underway are expected to reduce phosphorus by another 35,024 kg, including a one-time reduction of 21,345 kg. In comparison, stewardship projects funded in Phase I achieved a total four-year reduction of 6,492 kg of phosphorus. The current estimated phosphorus reduction for Phase II is expected to exceed the program target.

Outcomes associated with funded scientific research projects or outreach activities are reported through the Lake Winnipeg Basin Initiative Progress and Final reports.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

In 2014-15, in Phase II (2012-17) of the Lake Winnipeg Basin Initiative, the Department:

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.4.5: Community Ecosystem Partnerships

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program maintains and restores the beneficial uses and environmental quality of targeted ecosystems of federal interest, such as northern Canada, the Georgia and Okanagan Basins, and coastal ecosystems in Atlantic Canada (through the Atlantic Ecosystem Initiative). The program coordinates and oversees initiatives in these targeted ecosystems. The initiatives use strategic partnerships, research, science, and funding programs to support community ecosystem projects and partnerships. It works collaboratively with other regional partners in Atlantic Canada to advance efforts to conserve and restore important habitat, improve water quality, and better address the impacts of climate change. The program uses mechanisms such as the Canada-U.S. Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment 2012-2017 Action Plan. The goal is to expand knowledge, increase stakeholder capacity and involvement, improve decision-making and increase use of best practices to address complex environmental issues regarding water resources. The program is aimed at several levels of government, communities, businesses, industry, Aboriginal groups, non-governmental organizations and academia. It works to cooperate on opportunities to move forward on issues such as lake evaporation in the Okanagan Basin ecosystem and sustainability indicators that incorporate First Nations traditional knowledge in the Okanagan and Salish Sea ecosystems.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
2,267,267 2,259,387 -7,880
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
5 4 -1

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 1.3.4.5: Community Ecosystem Partnerships
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Achievement of objectives for improvements in beneficial uses and environmental quality in priority ecosystems set by Environment Canada and collaborating organizations Number of collaborative projects that address priority issues within the Atlantic ecozone are initiated or completed. 15 projects or more by April 2016

21 in 2014-15

This indicator tracks the number of collaborative, community-based projects supported by the program. This is the first year this indicator has been reported. 

In 2014-15, the target was exceeded by 40%.  Each of the projects addressed at least one of three priority issues for the Atlantic Ecosystem Initiatives: water quality, habitat and biodiversity, and impacts of climate change. Recipient organizations that have completed their projects have submitted final reports which track success against indicators developed for the respective priority issues addressed. 

Achievement of objectives for improvements in beneficial uses and environmental quality in priority ecosystems set by Environment Canada and collaborating organizations Number of partnerships or collaborative arrangements established or maintained to implement an ecosystem based approach to environmental management in the Atlantic ecozone. 5 partnerships or more by April 2016

3 as of March 2015

Three key collaborative arrangements were maintained or developed: the Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment, the Regional Committee on Coastal and Oceans Management, and Bras d’Or Lakes Collaborative Environmental Planning Initiative. These partnerships increased information exchange and/or supported collaborative activities with federal and provincial governments and non-governmental organizations. This is the first year of reporting on this indicator. Performance is considered to be on track to meeting the target in 2016.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Program 1.4: Compliance Promotion and Enforcement - Wildlife

Program Description

This program works to conserve and protect the natural environment through compliance promotion and enforcement of the Species at Risk Act, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994, the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act, and the Canada Wildlife Act. The program promotes compliance through the communication of information, education and consultation with parties affected by the statutes. It maintains a contingent of enforcement officers, whose activities include verifying conformity and bringing back conformity with laws, regulations and permits pertaining to wildlife and Environment Canada Protected Areas, as well as gathering intelligence, conducting inspections and pursuing investigations regarding alleged offenders. The program also works with the U.S. and Mexico under the auspices of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation to strengthen wildlife enforcement. These actions ensure that damages and threats to biodiversity are reduced for the benefit of Canadians and the international community.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Main Estimates
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Total Authorities
Available for Use
2014-15
Actual Spending
(authorities used)
Difference
(actual minus planned)
15,821,926 15,821,926 17,202,627 17,058,497 1,236,571
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
122 133 11

Performance Results

Program Activity 1.4: Compliance Promotion and Enforcement - Wildlife
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Compliance with wildlife laws and regulations administered by Environment Canada Percentage of inspected regulated communities compliant with regulatory requirements under the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 90% by March 2015

93% in 2014-15

Based on the inspections completed last year, the percentage of inspected regulated communities compliant with regulatory requirements under the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 is very high. Compliance in 2014-15 surpassed the 90% target and reflects an increase from 87% in 2013-14.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

In 2014-15, the Department conducted and reported on over 4,400 inspections and over 360 investigations under the Species at Risk Act (SARA), the Canada Wildlife Act, the Migratory Birds Convention Act, 1994 (MBCA, 1994), and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act (WAPPRIITA) resulting in 2,191 identified violations. The number of inspections was significantly lower than in 2013-14 (13,700 inspections, of which 10,000 were related to shipments of an illegal weight-loss product made from Aloe ferox, an endangered species).

The Department completed and reported on approximately 190 inspections and 36 investigations related to protected areas; the majority focused on high-risk areas and the conservation of species, as well as on illegal activities (e.g., illegal hunting). Investigations resulted in six convictions and successfulprosecutions were published in the Enforcement Notifications.

Key enforcement achievements in 2014-15 to protect at-risk species included: seizure and fines for unlawfully held elephant tusks; the arrest, in collaboration with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, of an illegal importer and seller of endangered black rhinoceros horn and other wildlife products (which led to incarceration in the U.S.); and seizure and fines for sea containers holding illegally imported protected species of turtles and tortoises under WAPPRIITA. Another important initiative, “Operation Qiniq,” focused on increasing monitoring and patrols of Protected Areas in the Canadian North. The Department monitored compliance with regulations under the MBCA, 1994, among migratory bird hunter communities by conducting 1,751 inspections and 182 investigations. Compliance in 2014-15 was 93%, which surpassed the 90% target and reflects an increase from 87% in 2013-14.

Collaboration with international partners continued, including under the auspices of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s Enforcement Working Group. Environment Canada engaged in cooperative activities (such as training on making greater use of technological advancements in enforcement) and intelligence and information-sharing with its counterpart organizations in the U.S. and Mexico. Trilateral cooperation on environmental enforcement in North America has fostered collaboration and helped each country prevent, detect and deter transboundary violations of environmental law.

Work to develop intelligence and operational capacity continued, in support the Department’s capacity to identify high risk non-compliance in the North (e.g., illegal entry into protected areas).

Strategic Outcome 2: Canadians are equipped to make informed decisions on changing weather, water and climate conditions.

Performance Measurement
Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Weather Warning Index (a weighted index of weather warning timeliness and accuracy) 7.6 on a scale of 0 to 10 by July 2015

8.3 in 2012 to 2014

This indicator is a three-year moving average, calculated based on the timeliness and accuracy of six warning types: severe thunderstorm, rainfall, freezing rain, wind, snowfall, and marine gale.

Previous values were 7.9 for 2010 to 2012 and 8.3 for 2011 to 2013.

The target has been exceeded for the third consecutive reporting period. The 2012-14 reporting period saw a small increase in accuracy and timeliness performance for predicting freezing rain and wind events. This improvement was offset by the slight drop in performance for the remaining warning types, leaving the index virtually unchanged compared with the 2011-13 period.

Program 2.1: Weather and Environmental Services for Canadians

Program Description

This program provides reliable, accurate and timely forecasts and warnings, as well as weather and environmental intelligence, to anticipate, manage and adapt to the risks and opportunities of changing weather, water, air quality and climate conditions. It involves monitoring, research, prediction and service delivery, based on sound science, to help Canadians make informed decisions to protect their health, safety, security and economic prosperity. Because a global effort is needed to monitor, understand and predict constantly changing weather, water, air quality, sea ice and climate conditions, the program works with various collaborators in Canada and around the world. Key partners include the World Meteorological Organization of the United Nations and its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, as well as the news media, academia and all levels of government in Canada. The program meets the Department’s responsibilities under the Department of the Environment Act, the Weather Modification Information Act, the Emergency Management Act (2007), the Convention of the World Meteorological Organization, and memoranda of agreement with national meteorological and space agencies. It provides forecasts and information in case of environmental emergencies associated with the release of toxic and radioactive material in the atmosphere. Grants and contributions in support of Weather and Environmental Services for Canadians are used as components of this program.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Main Estimates
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Total Authorities
Available for Use
2014-15
Actual Spending
(authorities used)
Difference
(actual minus planned)
165,962,548 165,962,548 180,986,784 174,493,294 8,530,746
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
1,077 1,086 9

Performance Results

Program 2.1: Weather and Environmental Services for Canadians
Expected Results Performance Indicatosr Targets Actual Results
Canadians use Environment Canada's weather and environmental services Percentage of the population of a warned area who report having seen or heard a recent weather warning and who took actions in response 30% by July 2016

43% in May 2012

This indicator measures use of Environment Canada's weather and environmental services, specifically its weather warnings. 2012 was the first time the question was asked in a national survey. The next survey is expected in 2016. 

Canadians understand information on the changing weather, water and climate conditions and the associated health and safety risks Percentage of the population who understand wind chill information To be determined Results for this indicator are not available. The indicator has been replaced for 2015-16.
Canadians understand information on the changing weather, water and climate conditions and the associated health and safety risks Percentage of targeted sensitive populationsFootnote 7 within selected regions receiving information on the Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) who: a) identify potential behaviour changes in response to current and/or forecast AQHI levels that are consistent with health messaging; and/or b) identify actual behaviour changed in response to current and/or forecast AQHI levels that are consistent with health messaging 10% to 20% of sensitive population (range is due to regional variation) by March 2016

42% in July 2013

This indicator tracks whether sensitive Canadian populations are using the Air Quality Heath Index to make decisions to protect their health by limiting their exposure to air pollution and adjusting their activity levels.

The reported value is based on one post-smog event survey conducted in Windsor, Ontario and should not be compared to the target, which is based on a national average. Post-event surveys are used to supplement national surveys for program management purposes, but their results show greater variability from region to region.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Environment Canada continued to ensure the delivery of 24/7 mission critical weather services to Canadians. The Department also continued to modernize its weather monitoring infrastructure with a federal government investment of $107.5 million for significant monitoring network upgrades and $26.5 million for major upgrades to weather warning and forecast systems (announced in January 2015 as part of a $348 million investment in core weather monitoring networks). These investments allowed monitoring infrastructure to be more resilient, and weather forecasts and warnings to be more accurate, detailed and timely, in order to support the health and safety of Canadians. The upgrades are part of a multi-year, major initiative aligned with the principles set out in Environment Canada’s Science Strategy 2014-2019 and demonstrate that the Department is keeping pace with evolving technology and has in place the required skills needed to deliver the Department’s mission critical services.

In 2014-15, Environment Canada continued to collaborate with the meteorological community in Canada and internationally in sharing the latest scientific knowledge and data to improve the accuracy of weather, climate and air quality information available to Canadians. Through its work with the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the Department exerted influence to leverage international science and technology expertise to enable Canada to remain at the forefront of knowledge and technology with respect to meteorology, climatology and hydrology.

The Department also continued to expand and improve the Air Quality Health Index (AQHI), making it accessible to over two-thirds (69%) of Canadians. 

Environment Canada continued to collaborate with its North American counterparts to increase the availability of weather prediction for monthly and seasonal forecasts and to improve meteorologists’ ability to deliver quality forecasts. In collaboration with Shared Services Canada and private sector partners, the Department also continued to ensure that current and future technologies to support warning re-engineering and next generation prediction system are maintained and developed. Maintaining and/or upgrading critical systems and infrastructure to provide services that Canadians rely on helps to reduce the risk of disruption as a result of potential natural or human-made hazards. In addition, the active maintenance and exercise of business continuity plans and leveraging a rigorous management system that is certified to the internationally recognized ISO 9001 standard helps to manage the risk of service disruption.

Sub-Program 2.1.1: Weather Observations, Forecasts and Warnings

Sub-Program Description

This program provides all-day, every-day weather warnings, forecasts and information with lead times of minutes to weeks. Its purpose is to help Canadians anticipate dangerous meteorological events so they have enough time to protect themselves and their property. Program activities combine research in science and modelling with regional monitoring, prediction and service delivery. These activities depend on the supercomputing capacity managed by Shared Services Canada. The program is delivered through collaborations involving data, science and information distribution in Canada and internationally. Key partners are the news media, all levels of government and academia in Canada, other national meteorological services, research and space agencies, and the United Nations World Meteorological Organization (WMO). The program contributes about $2 million annually to WMO to support Canada’s international commitments in meteorology and hydrology. It meets responsibilities under the Department of the Environment Act and Weather Modification Information Act and supports other departments acting under the Emergency Management Act (2007). Program delivery includes assessed contribution to the WMO and may include Grants and Contributions in support of Weather and Environmental Services for Canadians.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
134,203,251 145,489,405 11,286,154
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
811 876 65

Performance Results

Sub-Program 2.1.1: Weather Observations, Forecasts and Warnings
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Canadians have the information they need on current and changing weather conditions Percentage of the population who report that they are somewhat or very likely to access weather information during a typical day 90% by July 2016

90% in February 2011

The most recent value for this indicator is based on data collected in the 2011 Weather and Environmental Services Quality of Services Survey.

The 90% is composed of the 70% of respondents who answered that they were "very likely" to access weather information daily and the 20% who answered "somewhat likely".

Previous values were 92% in 2007; 93% in 2002 and 95% in 1997.

The target value was set following the 2011 survey and so is not applicable to the 2011 value. The next survey is expected in 2016.

Canadians have the information they need on current and changing weather conditions Percentage of the population who indicate that weather forecasts are "always" or "usually" useful 85% by March 2015

82% in February 2011

The most recent value for this indicator is based on data collected in the 2011 Weather and Environmental Services Quality of Services Survey.

The 82% is composed of the 26% of respondents who answered that they "always" found that weather forecasts provided enough information and the 56% who answered "usually".

Previous values were 80% in 2007 and 76% in 2002, suggesting an improving trend. The next survey is expected in 2016 at which time a comparison to the target value can be made.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 2.1.2: Health-related Meteorological Information

Sub-Program Description

This program provides forecasts, tools and information on atmospheric conditions that affect health, such as air quality, extreme temperatures and ultraviolet (UV) radiation. It supports the mandates of Environment Canada, Health Canada and many public and non-governmental health agencies. The program includes work on the Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) and other projects that assist Canadians in making informed decisions to protect their health and reduce pollution, and enable health agencies to help vulnerable populations to respond to changing atmospheric conditions. It is delivered across Canada through collaborations promoting data and information dissemination. Collaborators include the media, public health agencies at all levels of government, provincial environment agencies and non-governmental agencies. This program also includes conducting systematic observations and monitoring of background air pollutant monitoring (CAPMon Network) and ozone in the atmosphere and hosting the World Ozone and UV Data Centre, operated on behalf of the World Meteorological Organization and used by over 75 government agencies around the world. Program delivery may include grants and contributions in support of Weather and Environmental Services for Canadians.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
11,462,677 9,217,893 -2,244,784
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
86 64 -22

Performance Results

Sub-Program 2.1.2: Health-related Meteorological Information
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Canadians have the information they need to protect their health against risks related to air quality and other atmospheric conditions Percentage of targeted sensitive populations within selected regions receiving information on the Air Quality Health Index (AQHI) who report that they recall seeing or hearing AQHI information 15 to 25% of sensitive population (range is due to regional variation) by March 2016

17% in October 2011

This indicator measures the extent to which the AQHI is reaching the targeted audience. The most recent value was collected through the AQHI National Survey in 2011 and represents an initial baseline. The timing of the next survey has yet to be determined.

Canadians have the information they need to protect their health against risks related to air quality and other atmospheric conditions Percentage of the general population within selected regions receiving AQHI who report that they recall seeing or hearing AQHI information 15 to 20% of general population (range is due to regional variation) by March 2016

15% in October 2011

This indicator measures the extent to which the AQHI is well disseminated to the general Canadian population. The most recent value was collected through the AQHI National Survey in 2011 and represents an initial baseline. The timing of the next survey has yet to be determined.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 2.1.3: Climate Information, Predictions and Tools

Sub-Program Description

This program generates new knowledge and information about past, present and future states of the climate system and how it functions, as well as the changing composition of the atmosphere and its impacts. Its work includes developing global and regional climate models and scenarios; detecting human influence on climate change in Canada, including extremes; understanding the North and Canadian cryosphere; and tracking atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases and aerosols across Canada, including in remote locations. These activities increase understanding of the impacts of climate change on economic sectors and ecosystems. Results from the program’s analysis and research activities provide the scientific basis for policy development, mitigation, adaptation planning and decision-making to programs such as the Federal Adaptation Policy Framework, as well as products, services and tools to Canadians. In particular, climate services inform and assist users in adapting to both present climate variability and medium- to long-term changes in climate. The program shares data, science and information with all levels of government in Canada, academia, industry, consortia, standards councils, and the national and international scientific community, including organizations such as the World Meteorological Organization, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society. The program meets responsibilities under the Department of the Environment Act, Canadian Environmental Protection Act (1999), Emergency Management Act (2007) and the National Research Council Act (Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes), and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Articles 4 and 5: monitoring and research). Program delivery may include grants and contributions in support of Weather and Environmental Services for Canadians.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
20,296,620 19,785,996 -510,624
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
180 146 -34

Performance Results

Sub-Program 2.1.3: Climate Information, Predictions and Tools
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Clients and users have the information they require on climate projections and climate data sets on various time and spatial scales Annual number of downloads of climate datasets 25,000 downloads by March 2015

22,935 in the period April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2015

The indicator is a measure of use of climate information produced by the program. The value is reported as an annual average over three years to reduce the effects of year to year variability. Downloads of individual climate data products (e.g., climate models, historic climate data records) tends to be higher following scheduled updates. Timing of national and international climate assessments may also affect the indicator.

Results are within 10% of target.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Program 2.2: Weather and Environmental Services for Targeted Users

Program Description

Environment Canada provides specific predictions and services for targeted, weather sensitive sectors through formal arrangements and revenue contracts. Building on the core capabilities described under Program 2.1, this program provides reliable, accurate and timely weather, water, climate, air quality and ice observations, predictions and services to support the specific decision-making needs of the aviation, marine transportation, military, commercial and other sectors. The program delivers its services using various collaborations within Canada (including with other government departments), and internationally with the World Meteorological Organization, as well as other countries and international bodies such as the International Civil Aviation Organization. This program supports the Department in meeting obligations and responsibilities conferred by the Department of the Environment Act and the Convention of the World Meteorological Organization. It also helps other government departments meet their obligations under the Aeronautics Act and the Treaty in Support of International Civil Aviation, the Oceans Act and the Fisheries Act, and it supports memoranda of agreement with Transport Canada, National Defence and various provincial and territorial agencies.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Main Estimates
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Total Authorities
Available for Use
2014-15
Actual Spending
(authorities used)
Difference
(actual minus planned)
25,266,280 25,266,280 27,083,480 25,886,657 620,377
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
464 409 -55

Performance Results

Program 2.2: Weather and Environmental Services for Targeted Users
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Targeted sectors have the meteorological and environmental information and services they need to operate efficiently and safely Combined level of satisfaction of the main clients of the Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC) based on the statement "The services provided by the MSC meet our needs" 7.5 out of 10 by March 2015

8.3 based on surveys conducted from 2013 to 2015

This indicator is a measure of the extent to which the services provided by the program met the needs of its three main clients.  Data for this indicator were collected through three different surveys: NAV CANADA Questionnaire in 2014, Canadian Coast Guard Commanding Officer Survey in 2013 and Department of National Defence Questionnaire in 2015.

Previous values of the indicator were 8.0 in 2013-14 and 7.79 in 2012-13. The target has been exceeded.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

In 2014-15, Environment Canada continued to provide ice products and other weather services on a 24/7 basis to support the Canadian Coast Guard, Department of National Defence, NAV CANADA and other clients.

In collaboration with its clients, the Department completed or progressed with a number of key initiatives, including deploying weather buoys in the Arctic (see 2.2.1 and 2.2.3, below), developing, improving or implementing key prediction systems, and completing commitments to the International Maritime Organization for service delivery (see 2.2.2, below). The success of these and other collaborative initiatives reinforce the importance and value of leveraging relationships for effective and efficient service delivery.

The Department continued to modernize its weather monitoring infrastructure with a federal government investment of $107.5 million for significant monitoring network upgrades and $26.5 million for major upgrades to weather warning and forecast systems (announced in January 2015 as part of a $348 million investment in core weather monitoring networks). These investments maintain the weather, water and climate data that are used by Environment Canada to produce warnings and forecasts. The data are provided by a set of observing networks across the country that includes: weather radars; land-based and marine surface weather and climate stations; upper air stations (balloon-borne instruments called radiosondes); the Canadian Lightning Detection Network; and satellite ground receiving stations that receive Canadian and international satellite data. The new investments enable Environment Canada to further tailor weather forecasts and warnings to users’ needs, with increased accuracy, detail and timeliness.

Environment Canada continued to collaborate at home and internationally on products and service enhancements, including work with domestic partners to ensure smooth dissemination of the Department’s marine and ice products. For example, work is ongoing with the Safe at Sea Alliance of Nova Scotia to improve safety at sea for fishers.

An audit performed by the Commissioner of the Environmental Sustainable Development concluded that “Environment Canada has been improving weather and ice information in the Arctic.” The audit also identified emerging challenges such as the cost and availability of radar satellite imagery for the purpose of ice information; in response, the Department initiated (in collaboration with the Canadian Coast Guard) an assessment of the use and cost of a variety of radar satellites.

Sub-Program 2.2.1: Meteorological Services in Support of Air Navigation

Sub-Program Description

This program provides the aviation industry and its regulatory agency with meteorological services (observations, forecasts and warnings) all day and every day of the year. It supports the goals and missions of NAV CANADA and Transport Canada, and supports the domestic and international airlines operating in Canadian territory to make tactical decisions to maximize their efficiency, effectiveness and safety. The program also includes the Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre (VAAC), one of nine such centres around the world operating under the authority of the International Civil Aviation Organization. The VAAC forecasts the transport of airborne volcanic ash to reduce the risk of aircraft disasters, and provides operational support and backup to other VAACs worldwide. The program is delivered under a contract between Environment Canada and NAV CANADA.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
4,695,243 4,914,255 219,012
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
163 148 -15

Performance Results

Sub-Program 2.2.1: Meteorological Services in Support of Air Navigation
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
NAV CANADA and the aviation industry have the meteorological information and services they need to maximize their efficiency and aviation safety Overall client satisfaction index, on a scale of 1 (unsatisfactory) to 10 (excellent) Equal or above 7.5 by March 2015

7.2 in 2014

This indicator is a measure of the overall satisfaction with the products and services provided by the program for NAV CANADA and their clients. Data for the indicator were obtained through the NAV CANADA Questionnaire, administered online in the summer of 2014. The indicator value is an average of the individual respondent ratings. Previous reported values were 7.1 in 2013-14 and 8.0 in 2012-13.

The target was substantively met (within 5%). The decrease in satisfaction over the past two years may be due to transitional changes during NAV CANADA's modernization of their aviation weather surface observations. Next year’s results are expected to meet or exceed the target.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 2.2.2: Meteorological and Ice Services in Support of Marine Navigation

Sub-Program Description

This program provides marine industries and regulatory agencies with forecasts of the sea state, ice conditions and weather all day and every day of the year. It supports the International Maritime Organization by providing meteorological information for Canadian and international Arctic waters. It also supports the goals and mandates of the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) of Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The program also helps marine industries and other interests operating in Canadian waters, including organizations involved in shipping, fisheries and resource extraction, make tactical decisions, such as ship routing, to maximize their safety and efficiency. As a key collaborator, the CCG broadcasts information related to this program to marine interests, as well as providing in-situ weather, sea-state and ice information to Environment Canada. This program is operated in part through a memorandum of understanding with Fisheries and Oceans for services related to current and forecast ice conditions over Canadian navigable waters. The program meets responsibilities under the Department of the Environment Act, the Oceans Act and the Fisheries Act. It also supports commitments to the International Convention on Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System, and the North American Ice Service.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
12,309,715 14,218,609 1,908,894
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
157 144 -13

Performance Results

Sub-Program 2.2.2: Meteorological and Ice Services in Support of Marine Navigation
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Marine communities have the weather, wave and ice information they need to operate safely and efficiently in Canadian waters Percentage of mariners who indicate satisfaction with available products, including ability to access information Target has been set for 2016

98.5% in 2012 and 2013

The data for this indicator were collected through two surveys: Canadian Coast Guard Commanding Officers Survey, conducted in May to July 2013 and the Marine Weather Services Survey, conducted in November to December 2012.

Marine communities have the weather, wave and ice information they need to operate safely and efficiently in Canadian waters Percentage of clients and organizations within the targeted sector who report that they have factored ice information into their decisions Target to be determined once a baseline value is measured (in 2014) Results for this indicator are not available.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

An evaluation of the METAREAs initiative concluded that the program is relevant, well managed and delivered, and is making progress toward intended outcomes. In response to the evaluation’s recommendations, the program has initiated a review of service standards as part of continuing efforts to engage users to better determine and prioritize their needs and options for disseminating information in the future, and has initiated a review of the program’s logic model and performance measurement strategy.

Sub-Program 2.2.3: Meteorological Services in Support of Military Operations

Sub-Program Description

This program provides the Department of National Defence (DND) with meteorological and oceanographic information, predictions and tools needed for operations of the Canadian Forces (CF) in Canada and abroad. It is a collaborative program, operating under a formal memorandum of understanding with DND, responding to CF-specific needs and recovering its incremental costs from DND. This program is critical to CF operations, contributing to the effectiveness and safety of tactical, operational and strategic manoeuvres within Canada and in various active military areas globally. It also supports DND’s legal and statutory responsibilities under the Aeronautics Act, which is the legal foundation for military aviation safety.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
2,935,200 3,193,267 258,067
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
105 90 -15

Performance Results

Sub-Program 2.2.3: Meteorological Services in Support of Military Operations
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
The Department of National Defence has the meteorological and oceanographic information and knowledge it needs to optimize its operations in Canada and abroad Client satisfaction index, on a scale of 1 (unsatisfactory) to 10 (excellent), that combines input from survey data and DND management feedback 7.0 out of 10 by March 2015

8.5 in 2015

Data for this indicator were obtained from the Department of National Defence Questionnaire, administered between April 13 and May 12 of 2015. The results are reported here as they pertain to satisfaction with the products and consultation services provided during 2014-15. The reported value is an average of individual responses to three questions regarding the clarity and usefulness of consultations; the accuracy and quality of products and services; and the extent to which products and services met client needs overall.

In 2013-14, the value reported was 8.2. The target has been exceeded for the second consecutive year.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 2.2.4: Meteorological Services for Economic and Commercial Sectors

Sub-Program Description

This program provides a variety of economic and commercial sectors (such as news media, natural resources sectors and specialized users) with climate and meteorological services, including data from the Canadian Lightning Detection Network. The information and tools are used to make tactical and strategic decisions that maximize economic and commercial efficiency, competitiveness, environmental performance and safety in the short and longer term. In doing so, the program supports the mandates of Natural Resources Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, and others (such as provincial agencies). Many economic sectors are sensitive to changing weather and climate with respect to the safety and cost-effectiveness of their operations (e.g., just-in-time delivery, pest management), the demand for their services (e.g., hydro-electrical generation) and the future of their industry. Specialized data services allow users to obtain pertinent information through such mechanisms as specialized data links or one-on-one consultations. This program is delivered across Canada through collaborations involving data and science, often on a cost-shared or cost-recovered basis.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
5,326,122 3,560,526 -1,765,596
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
39 27 -12

Performance Results

Sub-Program 2.2.4: Meteorological Services for Economic and Commercial Sectors
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Targeted Canadian economic sectors have the meteorological information they need for their decision-making Satisfaction level of the media with respect to the services provided by Environment Canada, on a scale of 1 (unsatisfactory) to 10 (excellent) 7.5 out of 10 by March 2015

7.42 in 2012

Data for this indicator were obtained from a survey of media clients of the program (radio, television, print, web-based) administered in 2012. This is the most recent survey conducted with this client group. The reported value is an average of individual responses to four questions regarding satisfaction with: accessibility and delivery of weather services; responsiveness to client needs; understanding of client needs; and the extent to which services provided met client needs.

There are no prior values for this indicator. Performance cannot be assessed in relation to the target in the absence of a new value.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Strategic Outcome 3: Threats to Canadians and their environment from pollution are minimized.

Performance Measurement
Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Canadian emissions of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide equivalents) in megatonnes Performance Measurement Framework target: Relative to 2005 emissions levels, reduce Canada's total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 17% by 2020Footnote 8

726 Mt in 2013

The reported value is based on Canada's National Inventory Report, which follows an internationally agreed upon structure providing detailed information on greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks in Canada over the period 1990-2013.

The 2013 value is 3.1% lower than in 2005, and per-capita emissions remain at historic lows.

Ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations

(i) 24-hour average

(ii) Annual average

2015 Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter (PM2.5)

(i) 28 µg/m3 by December 2015

(ii) 10 µg/m3 by December 2015

Achievement of the 2015 Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standard will be determined at the local air zone level in each of the provinces and territories in 2016 once the ambient air quality information for 2015 becomes available.

In the interim, information on the percentage of monitoring stations of the National Air Pollution Surveillance program where measured ambient concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) were below the 24-hour and the annual targets during the 2011 to 2013 time period is provided.

91% of the stations (168 of a total of 184 stations) met the target during the 2011 to 2013 time period.

Ambient ground-level ozone concentrations (8-hour average) 2015 Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standard for ground-level ozone of 63 ppb by December 2015

Achievement of the 2015 Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standard will be determined at the local air zone level in each of the provinces and territories in 2016 once the ambient air quality information for 2015 becomes available.

In the interim, information on the percentage of monitoring stations of the National Air Pollution Surveillance program where measured ambient concentrations for ground-level ozone were below the 8-hour target during the 2011 to 2013 time period is provided.

81% of the stations (158 of a total of 195 stations) met the target during the 2011 to 2013 time period.

Program 3.1: Substances and Waste Management

Program Description

Activities in this program reduce threats to health and the environment posed by pollution and waste from human activities. The program assesses risks to the environment from substances that are already in commercial use (existing substances) and substances proposed for use in Canada (new substances). It also develops and implements measures to prevent or manage the risks from these substances and waste. Contributions in support of Substances and Waste Management are used as a component of this program.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Main Estimates
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Total Authorities
Available for Use
2014-15
Actual Spending
(authorities used)
Difference
(actual minus planned)
75,747,789 75,747,789 90,048,046 86,779,805 11,032,016
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
628 618 -10

Performance Results

Program 3.1: Substances and Waste Management
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Threats to Canadians and impacts on the environment posed by harmful substances and waste are reduced Percentage of drainage regions where Canadian or Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines (FEQG) are not exceeded for selected substances in sediment, water and/or biota

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS):

80% by September 2013

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs):

80% by September 2014

Fish: 30% of drainage regions where FEQG are not exceeded in the period 2011 to 2012

Sediments: 33% of drainage regions where FEQG are not exceeded in the period 2009 to 2014

Environment Canada conducted fish sampling in ten drainage regions and sediment sampling in nine drainage regions. Concentrations PBDEs were determined for subgroups (congeners) for which guidelines have been set. A drainage region is counted as having exceeded the guidelines if concentrations of any subgroup are founded at any sampling site.

For fish, improvements were noted for three drainage regions as compared to the 2008 to 2010 sampling. For sediments, there was improvement in one drainage region, although concentrations now exceed the guidelines in two other regions.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

In 2014-15, Environment Canada carried out a range of activities to assess risks to the environment from existing and new substances, and implemented measures to prevent and manage risks. Over the year, the Department published screening assessment reports (draft or final) that cover some 1,100 substances. These screening reports communicate with industry stakeholders and Canadians on the risk findings and conclusions of Environment Canada’s risk assessments completed under the Chemicals Management Plan (CMP).The Department received notification of, assessed and, where appropriate, took risk management actions. Actions included notification of new uses for chemical substances with respect to 500 new substances (including chemicals, polymers, nanomaterials and living organisms).

Environment Canada continued its work to build and maintain a strong science foundation for the CMP. With information received during the second phase of the Domestic Substances List Inventory Update, the Department set priorities for the next phase of the CMP, helped align with international initiatives applicable to Canadian context, and supported subsequent risk assessment and risk management activities.

The Department maintained stakeholder engagement by organizing three workshops to discuss scientific issues, future priorities for assessment and issues with the current program (see also 3.1.1, below).

In collaboration with Health Canada, the Department published two issues of the Chemicals Management Progress Report (July and December 2014) which provided stakeholders and others with up-to-date information on the activities and programs of the CMP. In addition to these reports, biannual reporting was undertaken to enhance the transparency of work under the CMP.

On the international front, under the Canada-China Joint Committee on Environmental Cooperation, the Department hosted a workshop for Chinese delegates (including site visits, case studies and an overview of Canada’s Environmental Emergencies Management System) and maintained discussions with China on chemical management frameworks, including approaches to managing perfluoroctane sulfonate and mercury.

Sub-Program 3.1.1: Substances Management

Sub-Program Description

This program is jointly implemented by Health Canada and Environment Canada. It is responsible for assessing all targeted existing commercial substances identified under the Chemicals Management Plan, as well as new substances, upon notification by industry of their import or manufacture, for risks to the environment. The program uses science-based risk assessment, priority-setting and timely regulatory actions (or other measures where appropriate) to manage these substances. It works to improve substance management through research and monitoring, and tracking of pollutant releases through reporting to the National Pollutant Release Inventory and ensures appropriate risk measures are in place, as well as engaging in national and international collaborations. The program maintains transparency with stakeholders through consultation processes. International obligations include the Basel, Rotterdam Convention and Stockholm Conventions, the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution and the Minamata Convention. Program delivery includes the assessed contribution to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. This program also uses regulations and other control measures to address the risks posed by end-of-life substances of concern, international and interprovincial movement of waste and hazardous recyclable material.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
49,328,823 55,319,130 5,990,307
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
410 417 7

Performance Results

Sub-Program 3.1.1: Substances Management
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Reduced releases to the environment of toxic and other substances of concern Canadian releases of selected controlled substances Isoprene: 80% reduction relative to the 2009 baseline  by March 2016

56% reduction as of 2013

This indicator measures the effectiveness of a Pollution Prevention Plan in reducing releases of isoprene from the rubber manufacturing sector. Data on releases are from the National Pollutant Release Inventory. The most recent available data are from 2013. Percentage reductions are calculated compared to 2009.

The downward trend in releases is on-track to achieving the target.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 3.1.2: Effluent Management

Sub-Program Description

This program manages the risks to the environment and human health from the discharge and deposit of waste residues (e.g., effluent). It does this by developing, implementing and administering strategies and programs, such as pollution prevention plans, regulations, codes of practice, guidelines and environmental performance agreements. It works under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, and the Fisheries Act to address waste discharges and substances of concern from industrial and public sectors, including but not limited to the mining and processing, forestry, wastewater and other sectors. Key activities include conducting research and risk analysis; developing and implementing regulations and other control instruments; assessing the results of environmental effects monitoring of regulated facilities; providing technical advice to environmental assessments; and acting as the focal point for the Department for the Fisheries Act Pollution Prevention Provisions (FA-PPP). Specifically, the program administers the FA-PPP, including the development of risk management instruments; administers the Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations to reduce the threats to fish, fish habitat and human health from fish consumption; works with the Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Quebec, and Newfoundland and Labrador on minimum effluent quality standards for wastewater effluent for the Far North; works to amend the Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations to include the Far North, and administers the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations and the Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations under the Fisheries Act to control or manage the deposit of deleterious substances into water to protect water quality and aquatic ecosystems.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
7,179,294 8,394,522 1,215,228
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
77 65 -12

Performance Results

Sub-Program 3.1.2: Effluent Management
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Prevention of effluent pollution from sectors regulated under the Fisheries Act Percentage of facilities whose releases are within regulated limits and meet effluent non-lethality requirements 95% by March 2015

Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations:

99.8% for total suspended solids (TSS);

99.9% for biochemical oxygen demand; and

96.2% for effluent non-lethality requirements

All results are for calendar year 2013.

These results are similar to those from 2012, with the exception of the rate for non-acute lethality, for which compliance decreased slightly from 98.3%. Since 1985, the quality of pulp and paper effluent released directly to the environment has improved considerably.

Metal Mining Effluent Regulations:

Over 99% compliance for metals and pH

99.3% compliance for cyanide (CN-)

97.9% for TSS

96.8% for acute lethality testing

All results are for calendar year 2013.

These results are similar to those from 2012, with the exception of rates for copper and acute lethality, which decreased slightly, and for cyanide, nickel, zinc and TSS, for which compliance increased slightly. Results have been mostly stable since 2003, except for TSS, for which compliance has increased.

 

Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations:

Regulated limits came into force on January 1, 2015 and will be reported for the first time in the 2016-17 Departmental Performance Report.

The reported values are based on the percentage of tests that are within authorized limits.

Prevention of effluent pollution from sectors regulated under the Fisheries Act Loading (in tonnes) of biological oxygen demand (BOD) matter and total suspended solids from wastewater treatment facilities subject to federal regulations To be determined (2015) Results for this indicator are not available. Regulated limits came into force on January 1, 2015 and will be reported for the first time in the 2016-17 Departmental Performance Report.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 3.1.3: Marine Pollution

Sub-Program Description

This program assesses, controls and monitors the disposal of wastes and other matter at sea and advises on marine pollution from ships. Since 2010, the program also has responsibility for assessing and controlling the risk of impacts to the marine environment resulting from Canadians or Canadian maritime traffic in the Antarctic. The program uses a mix of regulatory and non-regulatory instruments to prevent marine pollution. It addresses impacts on sediments and other wastes; administers prohibitions and controls, assesses and issues permits for disposal at sea and Antarctic expeditions; and researches and develops decision-making and monitoring tools, and standards. The program contributes to federal coordination of marine pollution prevention (ship-sourced); It works under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, including Part 7, Division 3 (Disposal at Sea), and the Antarctic Environmental Protection Act, 2003. The program also meets international obligations, including the London Convention and Protocol, the Antarctic Treaty and Madrid Protocol, and works to advance Canadian positions to influence global rules toward reducing and managing global marine pollution from all sources. Two cost recovery fees are applicable to disposal at sea permits: an application fee assessed on all permits, and a permit fee assessed on dredged and inert inorganic material.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
1,191,370 3,218,389 2,027,019
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
20 29 9

Performance Results

Sub-Program 3.1.3: Marine Pollution
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Reduced marine pollution from uncontrolled dumping at sea Percentage of disposal site monitoring events that do not require site management action 85% by March 2015

100% in 2014

This indicator is used to measure the effectiveness of the Disposal at Sea permit assessment process by looking at the results of disposal site monitoring. Any management action required at the disposal site because of deficiency in the original permit assessment will result in improvements to the permit assessment process. 

Eleven representative sites were monitored in 2014. No management actions were required and all sites monitored remain available for continued sustainable use, exceeding the stated target. Previous reported values were 89% in 2013 and 92% in 2012.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 3.1.4: Environmental Emergencies

Sub-Program Description   

This program aims to reduce the frequency and consequences of spills and related environmental emergencies involving toxic and other hazardous substances. The program conducts five major activities: prevention, preparedness, response, recovery, and research and development. Prevention involves regulating chemical facilities to develop and implement environmental emergency plans. Preparedness includes coordinating and planning international, national and regional environmental emergency preparedness capabilities, as well as sensitivity mapping. Response includes monitoring the actions of responsible parties, providing scientific and technical advice on weather and sea state, and on behaviour and effects of chemicals; providing sensitivity mapping and trajectory modelling; attending significant incidents; and operating the 24/7 National Environmental Emergencies Centre in Montréal. Recovery activities include assessing the damage and providing advice to polluters on repairing an environment damaged by an environmental emergency. Other activities include development of spill models, analysis methods, fate and behaviour algorithms, measurement and remote-sensing capabilities, decontamination protocols and counter-measures used during incidents. The program’s authority comes from the Environmental Emergency Regulations, as well as sections 34-8 of the Fisheries Act. Its responsibilities during an emergency are described in the Federal Emergency Response Plan’s Emergency Support Function, Annex #6 - Environment (2009).

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
10,223,358 10,128,030 -95,328
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
79 71 -8

Performance Results

Sub-Program 3.1.4: Environmental Emergencies
Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Regulatees comply with the requirements and obligations of the Environmental Emergency Regulations Percentage of facilities requiring environmental emergency plans that have them in place as required by the Environmental Emergency Regulations 100% by March 2015

86% as of March 31, 2015

This indicator is based on the percentage of regulated facilities that state that they have an environmental emergency plan developed and implemented as part of their reporting required under the Regulations.

Previous values of the indicator were 93% in 2014 and 98.5% in 2013.

Stable or reduced frequency of environmental emergencies in facilities subject to the Environmental Emergency Regulations Percentage of regulated facilities subject to the Environmental Emergency Regulations and that have an E2 plan that have environmental emergencies Maintain at 1% by March 2015

0.9% in 2014-15

This indicator is a measure of the effectiveness of mandatory environmental emergency plans in preventing emergency incidents. Lower values are desirable. Previous values of the indicator are 0.4% in 2013-14 and 0.4% in 2012-13. The target has been met for the past three consecutive years.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 3.1.5: Contaminated Sites

Sub-Program Description

This program is primarily directed to Environment Canada’s responsibilities in supporting the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan (FCSAP). The FCSAP is a 15-year Government of Canada horizontal program with the aim of reducing environmental and human health risks from known federal contaminated sites and associated federal financial liabilities. Sixteen federal departments, agencies and consolidated Crown corporations responsible for contaminated sites, including Environment Canada, are currently involved in the FCSAP program as custodians of sites. The Contaminated Sites Program responsibilities include hosting the FCSAP Secretariat, developing guidance and program policies, and providing expert support to federal custodians for the assessment and remediation/risk management activities at their sites. In addition, the FCSAP Secretariat coordinates the implementation of the Shared Sites Policy Framework. Under the Contaminated Sites Program, EC also provides technical and scientific advice to the custodial department responsible for the Sydney Tar Ponds project.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
7,824,944 9,719,734 1,894,790
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
42 36 -6

Performance Results

Sub-Program 3.1.5: Contaminated Sites
Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Reduced liability at higher-risk federal contaminated sites Reduction in liability at all Class 1 and Class 2 FCSAP funded sites during Phase II of FCSAPFootnote 9 $1.17 billion by March 2016

$592 million as of March 31, 2014

This indicator is a measure of the reduction of environmental liabilities associated with higher risk federal contaminated sites during Phase II of the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan.  2014-15 results will not be available until tabling in Parliament of the 2014-15 Public Accounts of Canada.

For the period 2011-12 to 2013-14, remediation expenditures have reduced the environmental liability by $592 million (approximately $200 million each year). Based on planning information provided by custodians, a reduction on liability of $1.12 billion of the $1.17 billion target (96%) is expected by 2015-16.

While remediation expenditures at contaminated sites contribute to decreases in liability, recorded liability may increase due to the completion of assessment activities and/or changes in the estimated remediation costs as better information becomes available.

Reduced risk to the environment and human health from federal contaminated sites Number of Class 1 and Class 2 FCSAP funded sites where risk reduction activities have been completed 368 sites by March 2016

140 as of March 31, 2015

This indicator is a measure of the implementation of remediation or risk-management activities at Class 1 (high priority) and Class 2 (medium priority) sites funded under Phase II of the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan.

On average, approximately 35 sites complete risk reduction activities each year. The target is not on track to be met by 2015-16 since the work to implement the remediation or risk-management plans has taken longer than anticipated when the target was established by custodians in 2011-12.

The number of sites does not always correlate with the level of effort. As remediation activities progress, additional contamination may be discovered resulting in delays to the completion of sites and increases in the amount of resources required to complete the risk reduction activities. 

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Program 3.2: Climate Change and Clean Air

Program Description

This program aims to protect the health of Canadians, the state of the environment and Canada’s economy from the harmful effects of air pollutants and the impacts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through the development and implementation of regulations and other control measures. Actions are based on sound scientific and economic analysis, and emissions monitoring and reporting. Work under this program involves continued collaboration with other governments and stakeholders; expert environmental science and technology advice, assessment, and program management in support of technology investment decisions, policy-making and regulations; and cooperation with the U.S. to align GHG regulations as appropriate, reduce transboundary air pollution and advance the development of clean technologies. It also involves participation, negotiations and contributions to international fora to address climate change and transboundary air pollution, and bilateral and multilateral processes in order to support Canada’s positions and objectives. This program includes contributions in support of Climate Change and Clean Air, and grants for the implementation of the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Main Estimates
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Total Authorities
Available for Use
2014-15
Actual Spending
(authorities used)
Difference
(actual minus planned)
154,813,450 234,152,193 161,572,084 121,061,134 -113,091,059
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
699 705 6

Performance Results

Program 3.2: Climate Change and Clean Air
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Threats to Canadians, their health and their environment from air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions are minimized Aggregate emissions of greenhouse gases from targeted and/or regulated sources Canada's national targets are a 17% reduction from 2005 levels by 2020, and a 30% reduction from 2005 levels by 2030Footnote 10

510 Mt in 2013

The reported value is the sum of emissions from the transportation, electricity, oil and gas, and emissions-intensive and trade-exposed sectors as reported in the 2013 National Inventory Report submitted by Canada to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Units are in carbon dioxide equivalents.

Previous values of the indicator include: 505 Mt in 2012 and 498 Mt in 2011. The 2013 value represents a 5% decrease from 2005.

Threats to Canadians, their health and their environment from air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions are minimized Canadian emissions of air pollutants from targeted sources Annual decline in the three-year moving average for all tracked substances

Particulate matter (PM10): 221,687 tonnes (5.0% decrease)

Nitrogen oxides (NOx): 2,033,645 tonnes (2.2% decrease)

Volatile organic compounds (VOC): 1,240,750 tonnes (4.4% decrease)

Reported values are from Canada's Air Pollutant Emission Inventory. The values are the combined three-year average emissions from industrial sectors (including electricity generation) and all mobile sources for the period 2011 to 2013. Percentage changes are in comparison to 2010 to 2012.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

The Department continued to advance its sector-by-sector regulatory approach to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions towards meeting the national 2020Footnote 11 reduction target. With regulations already in place for the transportation and coal-fired electricity sectors, work continued on development of regulations for other major emitting industrial sectors, as well as more stringent standards for transportation.

The Department also continued implementing the Air Quality Management System (AQMS) in collaboration with provinces, territories, and stakeholders to better protect human health and the environment. The system includes new ambient air quality standards, a framework for managing air quality through local air zones and regional airsheds, and emissions requirements for major industrial sectors and equipment types, as well as enhanced collaboration among governments to reduce emissions from mobile sources. Among its efforts on this front, in June 2014, the Department proposed in Canada Gazette, Part I the Multi-sector Air Pollutants Regulations, and published two draft Codes of Practice (see also 3.2.1.1). Environment Canada also continued work with provinces, territories and stakeholders to develop Canadian Ambient Air Quality Standards for two other air pollutants of concern: sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Early and ongoing engagement with provinces, territories and stakeholders continues to be important for the successful implementation of AQMS.

Environment Canada also continued to address short-lived climate pollutants (SLCPs). The Department co-chaired the Arctic Council Task Force for Action on Black Carbon and Methane, which finalized a framework to improve black carbon and methane science and reporting (see also 3.2.2). Canada developed its first black carbon inventory for submission in 2015 under the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (see also 3.2.2), and continued its leadership under the Climate and Clean Air Coalition. The Department’s active contributions under international fora are key to engaging with international partners; Canada also benefits from collective advancements in science and best practices for SLCPs.

Sub-Program 3.2.1: Climate Change and Clean Air Regulatory Program

Sub-Program Description

This program develops domestic approaches to climate change and air pollution by controlling emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and air pollutants, and promotes science-based approaches to develop new standards and regulations. Core program activities focus on developing and implementing regulations to achieve the reduction of emissions from the industrial, transportation, and consumer and commercial products sectors while maintaining economic competitiveness. The program also involves analysis related to cross-cutting issues, compliance flexibilities, and equivalency agreements with provinces, as well as consultations with industry, provincial and territorial governments, and other stakeholders. The program works with provinces and territories through the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment and is implementing the new Air Quality Management System, which includes establishing new outdoor air quality standards, implementing the industrial emission requirements. The program also works with other jurisdictions, including the U.S., to undertake regional and international efforts to manage transboundary air pollution. The program’s core activities are supported by legal and economic analysis, as well as scientific research, monitoring and modelling on the impacts of air pollution, which provide a basis to develop, implement and evaluate standards and regulations. The program involves data collection, emissions estimation and reporting to support domestic programs and meet international requirements. This includes: the design and implementation of the Single Window Reporting Initiative to provide a single harmonized system to report on GHG and air pollutant emissions; the maintenance of the GHG Emissions Reporting Program to track progress in GHG emission reduction; the estimation of emissions and removals for GHGs and the development, submission, and publication of the annual National GHG Inventory Report and Canada’s Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory; and, the submission of emission data to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and to the U.S. to meet commitments under the Ozone Annex andassess general performance reducing air pollutant emissions.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
95,534,501 96,164,115 629,614
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
609 608 -1

Performance Results

Sub-Program 3.2.1: Climate Change and Clean Air Regulatory Program
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Reduced emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases from regulated and/or targeted sectors Canadian industrial emissions of: total particulate matter (TPM); sulphur dioxide (SO2); nitrogen oxides (NOx); volatile organic compounds (VOC), mercury (Hg) and ammonia (NH3) To be determined with the finalization of the regulations

Total particulate matter (TPM): 436,978 tonnes (3.0% decrease)

Sulphur oxides (SOx): 1,129,544 tonnes (3.2% decrease)

Nitrogen oxides (NOx): 847,206 tonnes (2.0% decrease)

Volatile organic compounds (VOC): 778,305 tonnes (2.1% increase)

Mercury (Hg): 2,399 kg (12.2% decrease)

Ammonia (NH3): 15,340 tonnes (2.7% decrease)

Reported values are from Canada's Air Pollutant Emission Inventory. The values are three-year average emissions from industrial sectors (including electricity generation) for the period 2011-13. Percentage changes are in comparison to 2010-12.

Reduced emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases from regulated and/or targeted sectors Canadian transportation emissions of: particulate matter (PM10); nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) Decline of total emissions by March 2015

Particulate matter (PM10): 71,254 tonnes (9.3% decrease)

Nitrogen oxides (NOx): 1,186,439 tonnes (2.3% decrease)

Volatile organic compounds (VOC): 462,445 tonnes (13.6% decrease)

Reported values are from Canada's Air Pollutant Emission Inventory. The values are three-year average emissions from all mobile sources for the period 2011-13. Percentage changes are in comparison to 2010-12.

Reduced emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases from regulated and/or targeted sectors Canadian emissions of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide equivalents) in megatonnes (Mt) from industrial and mobile sources To be determined by sector-specific approach to addressing climate change

Oil & Gas: 179 Mt (14% increase)

Electricity: 85 Mt (30% decrease)

Transportation: 170 Mt (<1% increase)

EITE: 76 Mt (15% decrease)

Reported emissions are for 2013 for sectors covered by Environment Canada's sector-by-sector approach. Values are derived from Canada's 2013 National Inventory Report submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Units are in carbon dioxide equivalents. Percentage changes are in comparison to 2005.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 3.2.1.1: Industrial Sector Emissions

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program aims to reduce emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases (GHGs) from industrial sectors. Key activities include the development, implementation and administration of standards, regulations and other risk management instruments to reduce air pollutant in the major industrial sectors and GHG emissions from electricity, oil and gas and emissions-intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) industrial sectors. The program includes the implementation of the new ambient air quality standards and the new industrial emission standards, which are key elements of federal responsibility within the new Air Quality Management System. Additional activities include monitoring, emission quantification and reporting, verification, research and modelling, as well as economic and scientific assessments of current and future levels of air pollutants and GHG emissions to improve risk management, develop standards, regulations and other risk management instruments. The program is also responsible for reporting requirements under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, and reporting to meet domestic and international obligations. It includes the design and implementation of the Single Window Reporting Initiative. Furthermore, the program provides information to Canadians and decision-makers about the environmental impacts associated with air pollutants, which includes scientific monitoring and short-term studies regarding impacts from the oil sands.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
77,903,412 70,911,780 -6,991,632
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
466 419 -47

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 3.2.1.1: Industrial Sector Emissions
Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Industrial sectors meet emission intensity levels of greenhouse gases to comply with new or amended regulations by required dates Percentage of industrial facilities meeting their regulated greenhouse gas emissions performance target To be determined by the regulation

Results for this indicator are not available.

Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Coal-Fired Generation of Electricity Regulations were published in the Canada Gazette, Part II in 2012. Performance standards entered into force on July 1, 2015. Data for this indicator will be available in 2016 after the initial compliance reporting.

GHG regulations for certain other industrial sectors are currently under development. Reporting information will be available once regulations are in force.

Industrial sectors meet emission levels of air pollutants to comply with new or amended regulations by required dates Percentage of targeted industrial facilities meeting their regulated air pollutant emissions reduction requirement To be determined by the regulation

Results for this indicator are not available.

Air pollutant regulations for industrial sectors and equipment were under development in 2014-15. There are currently none in force. Reporting information will be available once the regulations are in force.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 3.2.1.2: Transportation Sector Emissions

Sub-Sub-Program Description

Under the Canadian Environmental Protection Agency, this program aims to reduce emissions from transportation sources (vehicles, engines and fuels) through key activities such as: the delivery of sound science and scientific advice, the development of GHG and air pollutant regulations as well as the implementation and administration of those regulations. These activities also include scientific testing and emissions verification to ensure compliance with standards. In addition, the program is working with Transport Canada to address air pollutant and GHG emissions from maritime shipping through the development of new domestic and international standards, and recommends practices for marine vessels in collaboration with the International Maritime Organization. As well, it shares information and identifies areas of joint interest with provinces and territories toward reducing emissions, through a Mobile Sources Working Group.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
16,551,663 24,610,919 8,059,256
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
133 183 50

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 3.2.1.2: Transportation Sector Emissions
Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Reduced greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicles, engines and fuels sold in Canada Percentage of companies meeting the fleet average greenhouse gas (GHG) emission requirements for passenger automobiles and light-trucks 100% by 2015

100% for the 2011 model year

The Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations introduced progressively more stringent GHG emissions standards for the 2011 to 2025 model years. Under the Regulations, companies that manufacture or import new vehicles are required to submit an annual end of model year report that is used to establish a company’s fleet average greenhouse gas performance relative to its applicable standard. The 2011 data was used since that was the most recent data available.

The target has been met.

Reduced air pollutant emissions from new motor vehicles, engines and fuels sold in Canada Percentage of companies meeting the fleet average nitrogen oxides (NOx) emission requirements for light-duty on-road vehicles 100% by December 2014

100% for the 2012 model year

The On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations introduced progressively more stringent air pollutant (including NOx) emission standards for the 2004 to 2016 model years. Under the Regulations, companies that manufacture or import new vehicles are required to submit an annual end of model year report that is used to establish a company’s fleet NOx average relative to the regulatory standard. The 2012 data was used since that was the most recent data available.The target has been met.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 3.2.1.3: Consumer and Commercial Products Sector

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program aims to reduce emissions of air pollutants from consumer and commercial products. This is achieved through the development and administration of regulations and other measures under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (Part 5-Controlling Toxic Substances). The program provides strategic planning to guide action in other consumer and commercial product sectors for the next phase of regulatory and non-regulatory measures.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
1,079,426 641,416 -438,010
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
11 6 -5

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 3.2.1.3: Consumer and Commercial Products Sector
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Reduced emissions of volatile organic compounds from regulated consumer and commercial products Percentage of volatile organic compound emissions reduction from the architectural coatings sector 28% by 2014

72% as of 2014

The reported value is based on a voluntary survey of firms in the architectural coatings sector. The percentage reduction was estimated by comparing the survey results to a 2005 baseline. The estimate corresponds to a reduction of 41 Kt of volatile organic compounds releases per year.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

In 2014-15, the Department continued to target control measures for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in some consumer and commercial products, such as solvents, which account for approximately 33% of all VOC emissions.

Highlights of the Department’s work included:

Sub-Program 3.2.2: International Climate Change and Clean Air Partnerships

Sub-Program Description

This program leads the development and implementation of bilateral and international agreements to address air pollutants and global greenhouse gas emissions, and coordinates Canada’s policy, negotiating positions and participation in relevant international fora. The program represents Canada at the North American Leaders’ Summit; leads and participates in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) process and complementary international processes to negotiate a comprehensive, binding international climate change agreement; and advances Canada’s negotiating positions and objectives in international fora, such as: the Climate Change and Clean Air Coalition to reduce Short Lived Climate Pollutants, the Arctic Council, Global Methane Initiative and Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves. The program meets international obligations by contributing to organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Inter American Institute for Global Change. The program also works with the U.S. under the Canada-U.S. Air Quality Agreement (AQA), to undertake regional and international efforts to manage transboundary air pollution. The program also works to implement the U.S.-Canada Clean Energy Dialogue, to support bilateral collaboration on clean energy priorities, as well as with the Commission for Environmental Cooperation to address common issues related to climate change and air quality. It also participates in the ongoing negotiations and implementation of the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution. Using the National Pollutant Release Inventory, the program prepares and submits the Air Pollutant Emission Inventory to meet domestic needs and international reporting requirements. As well, it coordinates Canada’s participation under the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and its Multilateral Fund, with a view to ensuring the gradual elimination of ozone-depleting substances at a global level. Participation under the Montreal Protocol includes promoting a North American proposal to phase-down consumption and production of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), in a manner complementary to provisions on HFCs under the UNFCCC. Participation in the Multilateral Fund includes ensuring payment of Canada’s assessed contribution to the Fund and of the costs of hosting its Secretariat in Montreal (paid through the grants for implementation of the Montreal Protocol). The program supports, in cooperation with other departments and in alignment with international programs, domestic priorities regarding climate change.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
16,817,489 18,366,717 1,549,228
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
42 38 -4

Performance Results

Sub-Program 3.2.2: International Climate Change and Clean Air Partnerships
Expected Result Performance Indicator Targets Actual Results
International negotiations and agreements on air pollutants and greenhouse gases are proceeding in a direction consistent with Canadian priorities and interests Percentage of stated objectives to be achieved in international negotiations and/or agreements which were met or mostly met

Negotiations: 70% by March 2015

Agreements: 70% by March 2015

Negotiations: 86%

Agreements: No agreements were concluded in 2014-15

This indicator is a measure of program performance in furthering Canada's objectives in the United Nations Framework Agreement on Climate Change negotiations.

Previous results for negotiations were 71% in 2013-14 and 81% in 2012-13.

The target was raised to 70% from 50% last year, but continued to be met. The current target is a balanced and realistic approach since some objectives cannot be realized in most negotiating sessions due to procedural issues outside of Canada’s control. Such issues are not expected to impede progress towards reaching an agreement in 2015 that sets a new climate change framework.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Program 3.2.3: Environmental Technology

Sub-Program Description

This program delivers expert environmental science and technology analysis and assessment, and program management to support the Government of Canada’s clean air and greenhouse gas (GHG) technology investment decisions, policy-making and regulations. It oversees the operations of Sustainable Development Technology Canada with Natural Resources Canada and a range of other science and technology programs related to clean technology. It provides expert analysis and assessment to advance clean technologies to help ensure that government priorities regarding clean air, climate change mitigation and green infrastructure are addressed.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
121,800,203 6,530,302 -115,269,901
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
48 59 11

Performance Results

Sub-Program 3.2.3: Environmental Technology
Expected Result Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Reduced emissions from the implementation of new environmental technologies Annual reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide equivalents) resulting from environmental technologies supported 7.1 Mt by 2015

4.5 Mt as of 2014

This value represents the combined annual reductions reported as achieved for all projects supported by Sustainable Development Technology Canada and the Green Municipal Fund from their inception up to the most recent annual reports.

Reduced emissions from the implementation of new environmental technologies Annual reduction of emissions of air pollutants (criteria air contaminants) resulting from environmental technologies supported 22.1 kt by 2025

Annual reductions for 2014 are estimated to be:

  • 3.5 kt for nitrogen oxides
  • 2.8 kt for sulphur oxides
  • 0.3 kt for particulate matter
  • 0.1 kt for volatile organic compounds

These values are mostly due to reductions reported by Sustainable Development Technology Canada. The Green Municipal Fund also reported combined annual reductions of air pollutants of 3.1 t, but separate values for specific substances are not available.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 3.2.3.1: Sustainable Development Technologies

Sub-Sub-Program Description

Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) is a not-for-profit foundation, created by the Government of Canada, to finance and support the development and demonstration of clean technologies. It is overseen by Environment Canada and Natural Resources Canada. SDTC operates two funds aimed at the development and demonstration of innovative technological solutions: the $590-million SD Tech Fund™, which supports projects that address climate change, air quality, clean water and clean soil; and the $500-million NextGen Biofuels Fund™, which supports the establishment of first-of-kind, large demonstration-scale facilities for the production of next-generation renewable fuels. SDTC reports to Parliament through the Minister of Natural Resources Canada. Federal funding flows to SDTC from Environment Canada (50 percent) and Natural Resources Canada (50 percent).

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
117,044,282Footnote 14 158,437 -116,885,845
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
2 1 -1

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 3.2.3.1: Sustainable Development Technologies
Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Reduced emissions from the implementation of environmental technologies funded under the SD Tech Fund™ Annual reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide equivalents) resulting from environmental technologies funded under the SD Tech Fund™ 7 Mt by 2015

4.5 Mt as of 2014

The SD Tech FundTM portfolio companies are on track to deliver GHG emissions reductions in line with expected targets. Reductions are dependent on a number of economic factors, including technology uptake, volatility in commodities pricing, and changes in the regulatory environment. Reported values have been discounted to allow for potential uncertainty.

Reduced emissions from the implementation of environmental technologies funded under the SD Tech Fund™ Annual reduction of emissions of air pollutants (criteria air contaminants) resulting from environmental technologies funded under the SD Tech Fund™ 22 kt by 2025

Annual reductions for 2014 are estimated to be:

  • 3.5 kt for nitrogen oxides
  • 2.8 kt for sulphur oxides
  • 0.3 kt for particulate matter
  • 0.1 kt for volatile organic compounds

The SD Tech FundTM portfolio companies are on track to deliver estimated air pollutant reductions that exceed expected targets in 2025. Reductions are dependent on a number of economic factors, including technology uptake, volatility in commodities pricing, and changes in the regulatory environment. Reported values have been discounted to allow for potential uncertainty.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:

Sub-Sub-Program 3.2.3.2: Environmental Technology Innovation

Sub-Sub-Program Description

This program delivers expert environmental science and technology (S&T) analysis, assessment and program management. It provides advice and conducts assessments of the environmental performance (benefits and impacts) of new and emerging technologies that advance clean technologies on a life cycle basis. It also supports interdepartmental steering committees in prioritizing and governing the activities of funds aimed at supporting clean technologies, including providing expert advice, establishing criteria to guide funding decisions and evaluating environmental outcomes of funded projects. It oversees and supports a range of S&T programs including the Program of Energy Research and Development (PERD), Clean Energy Fund (CEF), ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative (ecoEII), Green Municipal Fund (GMF), Strategic Technology Applications of Genomics in the Environment (STAGE), and the Canadian Environmental Technology Advancement Centres (CETACs). The program also manages the Canadian Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program, which provides validation and independent verification of clean technologies.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Actual Spending
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
4,755,921 6,371,865 1,615,944
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
46 58 12

Performance Results

Sub-Sub-Program 3.2.3.2: Environmental Technology Innovation
Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Reduced emissions from municipal projects supported by the Green Municipal Fund (GMF) Annual reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide equivalents) and air pollutants criteria air contaminants (CACs) resulting from municipal projects supported by the GMF

100,000 t greenhouse gases (GHGs) by 2013-14

100 t CACs by 2013-14

11,533 t GHGs in 2014-15

5,280 t GHGs in 2013-14

4.2 t of air pollutants in 2014-15

3.1 t of air pollutants in 2013-14

GMF funding recipients report on environmental benefits based on one complete year of operation within the first three years of the project being completed. Environmental benefits reported this year thus reflect recently completed projects that were approved for GMF funding in previous years. In 2013-14 and 2014-15, GMF-funded projects reported fewer GHG and CAC emissions reductions than expected. This may be due in part to the focus of GMF projects reporting in those years (GMF funds projects focused on many aspects of environmental performance including, but not limited to, emissions reductions), the limitation that emissions reductions are reported for only one year of a project lifetime, and because some projects may omit reporting their emissions reductions. In addition, the targets were identified by Environment Canada based on emissions reductions reported in the 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 GMF Annual Reports; these reductions may not have been representative of future emissions reductions.

The indicator will be refined in future years to provide better measurement of the environmental benefits of GMF.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

Highlights of the Department’s performance in 2014-15 include the following:  

Program 3.3: Compliance Promotion and Enforcement - Pollution

Program Description

This program contributes to minimizing damage and threats to the natural environment and biodiversity through the promotion and enforcement of legislation administered by Environment Canada. Activities focus on pollution including toxic substances, their release to air, water or land, and the import and export of hazardous waste that presents a risk to the environment and/or human health. The program maintains a contingent of compliance promotion and enforcement officers. Compliance promotion officers deliver activities to increase regulatees’ awareness, understanding and compliance with regulations and other risk management instruments under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, and the Fisheries Act. The goal is to increase the effectiveness in achieving desired environmental results. The officers also provide information on risk management instrument requirements, the benefits of compliance and the potential penalties of non-compliance, when applicable. Enforcement officers gather intelligence, conduct inspections to verify compliance with laws and regulations, and pursue investigations to take appropriate enforcement measures against offenders. The program works with the U.S. and Mexico through the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation to strengthen transboundary environmental enforcement. The program also includes officer training, information management systems for new regulations and administration, and is informed by scientific analyses and expertise, including science advice to support compliance promotion and enforcement actions.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Main Estimates
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Total Authorities
Available for Use
2014-15
Actual Spending
(authorities used)
Difference
(actual minus planned)
38,324,642 38,324,642 42,693,720 42,309,866 3,985,224
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
296 363 67

Performance Results

Program 3.3: Compliance Promotion and Enforcement - Pollution
Expected Result Performance Indicator Target Actual Results
Compliance with pollution laws and regulations administered by Environment Canada Compliance with regulatory requirements for selected regulations

10% increase in compliance relative to the baseline

Dry Cleaning Regulations:

2015-16 (baseline year 2012-13)

Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations:

2016-17 (baseline year 2013-14)

Metal Mining Effluent Regulations: 

2017-18 (baseline year 2014-15)

98% in 2014-15

This indicator is intended to measure changes in compliance for selected regulated sectors. First, a baseline compliance rate is determined through inspections of a random sample of regulated facilities or persons. A second measurement is then conducted a few years later to determine if the application of enforcement and compliance promotion efforts has increased compliance. Where the initial baseline rate of compliance is 90% or higher, a second measurement is not conducted and efforts are directed to other sectors.

The value reported this year is the baseline rate for facilities regulated under the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations. As the current compliance rate is very high, future reporting for this indicator will address other sectors.

The reported compliance rate considers only specific sections of the regulations and the Fisheries Act at each site at the particular time it was inspected. It does not take into account non-compliance that may have occurred or was reported at other times during the year. It also does not include contraventions to administrative or other sections of the regulations that do not have direct environmental impact.

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

In 2014-15, Environment Canada conducted and reported on 7,944 inspections and 66 investigations to enforce regulations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999) and the Fisheries Act. These activities resulted in 3,430 enforcement measures taken in cases of non-compliance, which included prosecutions, written warnings, Environment Protection Compliance Orders, directions and tickets. Successful prosecutions totaled 40 and resulted in over $9.4 million in penalties. The largest penalty ever imposed for environmental infractions in Canada saw a company (Québec) fined $7.5 million for 45 charges under the Fisheries Act, resulting from several incidents. In another case, a company (Alberta) was fined $850,000 under the Fisheries Act. Other successful prosecutions were published in the Enforcement Notifications.

In order to increase regulatory compliance in the dry cleaning sector, the Department contacted and provided promotional materials for all concerned dry cleaners resulting in 100% of the community being aware of the regulatory requirements. Environment Canada conducted 720 new inspections and 16 new investigations under the Tetrachloroethylene (Use in Dry Cleaning and Reporting Requirements) Regulations, resulting in 706 enforcement measures.

Action taken to address some priority issues under the National Enforcement Plan included: establishing a baseline compliance rate for Metal Mining Effluent Regulations (98.6%); initiating work to ensure the removal of 325 high-risk storage tanks (Storage Tanks Systems for Petroleum Products and Allied Petroleum Products Regulations); and improving reporting to the National Pollutant Release Inventory in the Chemicals and Manufacturing, Oil and Gas and Metal Manufacturing sectors.

The Department continued to develop operational capacity to identify high risk non-compliance in the North (e.g., illegal entry into protected areas) and continued its participation in interdepartmental working groups to ensure environmental enforcement is taken into consideration in pan-government policy development regarding the North.

The Department engaged with the U.S. and Mexico under the auspices of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s Enforcement Working Group to deliver on its multilateral commitments and participated in capacity building initiatives.

Internal Services

Description

Internal Services are groups of related activities and resources that are administered to support the needs of programs and other corporate obligations of an organization. These groups are: Management and Oversight Services; Communications Services; Legal Services; Human Resources Management Services; Financial Management Services; Information Management Services; Information Technology Services; Real Property Services; Materiel Services; Acquisition Services; and Travel and Other Administrative Services. Internal Services include only those activities and resources that apply across an organization and not to those provided to a specific program.

Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)
2014-15
Main Estimates
2014-15
Planned Spending
2014-15
Total Authorities
Available for Use
2014-15
Actual Spending
(authorities used)
Difference
(actual minus planned)
181,427,802 181,427,802 204,386,901 203,115,955 21,688,153
Human Resources (FTEs)
2014-15
Planned
2014-15
Actual
2014-15
Difference
(actual minus planned)
1,472 1,487 15

Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned

In 2014-15, Environment Canada’s internal services continued to enable the Department to align with government-wide goals to accelerate the transformation of systems and processes providing increased efficiency. Progress on several fronts of the Department’s Transformation@ EC Agenda aligned with Central Agencies’ directions (including the Clerk of the Privy Council’s Blueprint 2020 Initiative).

The Department:

In collaboration with the Department’s science and technical programs, Internal Services continued to address the challenges of recruiting and retaining highly specialized staff to deliver key scientific programming. Efforts focused on maintaining long-term recruitment and staff development strategies, and on maintaining the close working relationships with universities to assist in developing the future workforce.

As part of a broader strategy to reduce the risk of not being able to deliver its services because of the failure of essential infrastructure and systems, Internal Services providers continued to support key departmental programs in developing and testing business continuity plans.

Page details

2018-12-06