Evaluation at a Glance : Habitat Conservation Partnerships Program

On this page

About the program

Habitat is where wildlife lives. Conserving habitat is a critical element in the conservation and protection of wildlife.

The Habitat Conservation Program (HCP) addresses the need for wildlife habitat conservation in Canada by funding projects and facilitating the donation of ecologically sensitive private lands through tax incentives. It also encourages partnerships and habitat conservation activities that secure, protect, improve and restore important and ecologically sensitive habitat to enhance the survival of wildlife, including migratory birds and species at risk.

Figure 1: The Habitat Conservation Partnerships Program

Long description for figure 1

The Habitat Conservation Partnerships Program consists of seven programs. The following five programs are included in this evaluation report:

  • Natural Areas Conservation Program (NACP)
  • North American Waterfowl Management Plan (NAWMP)/North American Wetlands Conservation Council (Canada) (NAWCC Canada)
  • Wildlife Habitat Canada (WHC) Conservation Stamp Initiative
  • Ecological Gifts Program (EGP)
  • Canada’s participation in the Ramsar Convention

Two components were added to the program in 2014, when the government of Canada announced the National Conservation Plan:

  • Family Oriented Conservation Programming
  • National Wetland Conservation Fund

They were excluded from the scope of the evaluation because it was still too early to be able to assess their performance.

What the evaluation found

Recommendations

Two recommendations are addressed to the Assistant Deputy Minister, Canadian Wildlife Service, who has accepted them and has developed management action plans in response.

  1. Take appropriate actions to increase participation of targeted stakeholders in program areas where they are under-represented.
  2. Introduce a consolidated approach to strategic planning and priority setting among the various HCP Program components.

About the evaluation

The evaluation was conducted between April 2014 and March 2016. Multiple lines of evidence informed the results, including a document review, 37 interviews with internal and external stakeholders, an online survey of stakeholders and six case studies.

Page details

Date modified: