Evaluation of Canada’s meteorological warning services for Arctic Ocean: chapter 2
Annex 3 Summary of Findings
RELEVANCE Evaluation Question |
Acceptable | Opportunity for Improvements | Attention Required | N/A / Unable to Assess |
1. Is there a continued need for the METAREA Initiative? | ● | |||
2. Is the METAREA Initiative aligned with federal government priorities? | ● | |||
3. Is the METAREA Initiative consistent with federal/departmental roles and responsibilities? | ● |
PERFORMANCE Evaluation Question |
Acceptable | Opportunity for Improvements | Attention Required | N/A / Unable to Assess |
4. To what extent have intended outcomes been achieved as a result of the METAREA Initiative?
|
● |
|||
5. Have there been any unintended (positive or negative) outcomes? | ● | |||
6. Is the Initiative design appropriate for achieving its intended outcomes? | ● | |||
7. To what extent is the governance structure clear, appropriate and efficient for achieving intended outcomes? | ● | |||
8. Is the METAREA Initiative undertaking activities and delivering products at the lowest possible cost? | ● | |||
9. Are performance data being collected and reported | ● |
Note: The rating symbols and their significance are outlined in Table 2, Section 4.0.
Page details
- Date modified: