Final Report by the Task Force on Just Transition for Canadian Coal Power Workers and Communities: section 7
Part 2: Recommendations for a just and fair transition for Canadian coal power workers and communities
Our Recommendations for a Just and Fair Transition for Canadian Coal Power Workers and Communities provide advice to the Government of Canada to ensure that the country as a whole bears the costs associated with phasing out coal-fired electricity.
The Task Force calls on the Government of Canada to act immediately and provide just transition supports in three areas: Foundational, Workers, and Communities.
Taking action on these three fronts will affirm the Government’s commitment to a just transition, protecting workers’ rights, supporting families, and enabling local economic growth. These objectives can and indeed must be advanced in step with Canada’s efforts to mitigate climate change.
While our recommendations cannot eliminate all the uncertainties and changes coal workers and communities are facing, the Government’s implementation will demonstrate that it can act swiftly, with purpose, and in the best interests of Canadians. Support is needed in all affected provinces. Of these, there is particular urgency for action to support workers and communities in Alberta, where the coal phase-out is well underway.
Canada’s initial $35 million investment
To complement our Task Force’s work, Budget 2018 dedicated $35 million over five years to support skills development and economic diversification activities, to help workers and communities in the west and in the Atlantic region adapt to Canada’s transition to a low-carbon economy.
We welcome the Government of Canada’s initial investment of $35 million to support affected workers and communities as a necessary first step. Based on what we heard and consistent with our broader recommendations, we advise that this funding be prioritized in two ways:
- to support economic development and diversification projects in affected communities that will stimulate new employment opportunities
- to invest in transition centres for affected workers, families, and communities that will improve access to government services and programs
The $35 million committed in 2018 should be the beginning of a longer plan. Based on what we heard, the direct and indirect costs of the phase-out will stretch well into the hundreds of millions of dollars and the timeframe will go beyond 2030. While there are opportunities to reprioritize, reallocate and dedicate some existing funding, including for infrastructure, achieving a just transition will require additional and more substantial investments in Budget 2019 and budgets thereafter.
The Government of Canada is investing billions of dollars to mitigate and adapt to climate change, including historic investments in infrastructure.Footnote 35 If the Government is strategic with these existing funds and commits to new support extended over the several years of transition planning, affected workers will see new economic opportunities in their communities that can employ and sustain them, their families, and their neighbours for years to come.
Foundational just transition supports
- Taking action to embed the principles of just transition in the Government of Canada’s processes and planning will establish the foundation upon which future targeted just transition measures can be built. This will enable enduring and effective action over the long term, which is essential to support workers, families and communities in the transition to a low-carbon economy
- By putting foundational support measures in place, the Government can begin to change public perception and build trust
- Doing so is of the utmost importance because coal workers and communities can become future leaders and advocates for the successful transition to a low-carbon economy
- The Government of Canada can start now by building goodwill through the development and implementation of flexible and durable supports, open communication, and collaborative planning processes
What we heard
Coal workers, their families, and communities fear that without careful and inclusive planning, they may face devastating impacts from the coal phase-out. Workers and community members expressed their dissatisfaction with how the Government decided and announced the phase-out in the first place, pointing to limited or no consultation about the impacts for both provincial power grids and for the coal mine and electricity-generation workforces.
Going forward, stakeholders ask that the Government of Canada structure the transition process in ways that allow for considerate, collaborative, and transparent decision-making that accommodates the unique circumstances of each province to the greatest extent possible. They called for both the monitoring and evaluation of the short and long-term results of all government spending and other actions taken. They want to see new solutions put in place, through increased and improved planning, new supports for those affected, and a commitment to doing better—immediately and over the long term. They acknowledged that predictable and durable policies, programs, and services are necessary in order to plan sound futures. When governments change, coal workers and communities do not want their supports rolled back or cancelled.
Additionally, coal workers, their families and communities are hoping for and need a suite of solutions that are, to the greatest extent possible, driven by local conditions. It was clear in our meetings with stakeholders in all four provinces that every community and workplace is different. They emphasized repeatedly that there is no “one-size-fits-all” set of programs and services that could work without built-in mechanisms to allow flexibility and adaptability.
Ten years is not a lot of time to find an alternative option, considering all of the decisions that need to be made and steps that need to be taken.
– Municipal representative, Belledune, NB
Coal workers and community members have many questions about when, if, and how the coal transition will affect them personally as well as professionally. Furthermore, many expressed sincere doubt about the ability of government to support them through a transition, and mistrust of government’s intentions and capabilities. Given worker and community suspicion of government, some representatives called for ongoing external oversight and advice. A lack of confidence, given past transition failures, is driving anxiety and fears that the government will not deliver on just transition.
We are still waiting for answers – we want to know what is happening. Is coal done or not?
– Community member, Estevan, SK
In travelling across the country, we heard not only about the fears and concerns of workers and communities, but also about what has worked in some previous workforce transitions. We learned how locally-run transition centres that opened following the closure of other industries were an important resource and space to facilitate information sharing and service delivery. Workers, governments, and community representatives recognized these centres as a proven model to deliver consistent yet context-appropriate and flexible services and information, covering everything from re-employment opportunities and skills recognition, to educational and financial services, and healthcare. We heard how important it is that these centres be locally driven and adequately resourced to offer a broad range of services delivered by qualified personnel that understand and appreciate local conditions.
One of the key concerns we heard was a lack of information that would allow coal workers to effectively plan for what is to come. Workers, families, and communities struggle to find examples of successful transitions that they can use as a road map. While some were hopeful about the future, many more were pessimistic. Timely, accurate, and trustworthy information from employers and governments would help to reduce anxiety and give workers greater assurances when making decisions for themselves and their families.
Transition centres have been used in North America in numerous instances to provide active support to people affected by rapid labour market changes. These centres are designed to ensure that individuals already under stress from job loss or displacement receive personalized, one-on-one, face-to-face assistance to navigate the complex and often depersonalizing challenges of government programs and service delivery. Transition centres have some unique characteristics, including that they are:
- located within the communities or at job sites that are impacted by the labour disruption they seek to address
- staffed preferably by people from the impacted industry sector or the community
- inclusive spaces that are able to offer support and assistance with all relevant programs and services under one umbrella
- put in place preferably before, but at least as soon as, the impacts are announced
- remain open for three to five years or until the effects of the disruption have dissipated
As a single entry point, transition centres become live hubs, where people can find one another, receive support for their next-stage-of-life planning, and foster a sense of community.
Transition programming lessons learned from Community Fisheries Development Centres in BC
When the Government of Canada first introduced the Pacific Salmon Revitalization Strategy in 1996, affecting approximately 2,200 workers in the commercial fishing industry in British Columbia, the government did not initially include a transition package for affected fishermen and communities. By working together, unions and communities were able to negotiate a package of support measures.
Through strong local advocacy, the Native Brotherhood of BC, the United Fishermen and Allied Workers Union, and the Government of British Columbia established a network of eleven Community Fisherman Development Centres (CFDC) in coastal communities across the province. This model proved successful for several reasons: it pooled the funding available from several federal departments; the CFDCs received the mandate to propose how funds would be dispersed; and, people from fishing communities and the industry were actively engaged in both the design and delivery of the transition program.
This approach built on the strong position of unions to ensure affected workers received employment opportunities and spurred community buy-in and accountability. Over five years, the local CFDC offices created a bridge between federal funding and local opportunities, knowledge, and skills. Programs and services included employment insurance top-ups, extended employment insurance benefits, post-employment insurance benefits, training and education, and habitat restoration and infrastructure projects designed with targeted employment and skills-training opportunities for displaced workers.
Based on what we heard, we recommend that the Government of Canada:
Embed just transition principles in planning, legislative, regulatory, and advisory processes to ensure ongoing and concrete actions throughout the coal phase-out transition
Recommendation 1: Develop, communicate, implement, monitor, evaluate, and publicly report on a just transition plan for the coal phase-out, championed by a lead minister to oversee and report on progress
- Building on our report, the Government of Canada would initiate a multi-stage planning process for this transition in close collaboration with provinces, employers, workers, unions, municipalities, and economic development organizations
- The lead minister would be responsible for the plan and would be held accountable for its overall success. To ensure short and long-term accountability, the plan would clearly define and assign responsibility to all other ministers who are responsible for implementing parts of the plan. Key to the ultimate success of the plan will be the ability for federal departments and agencies to coordinate service delivery and prioritize expenditures in their respective areas of responsibility
- While the plan would have concrete and time-bound actions, it also needs to have the necessary flexibility to evolve as new transition options and opportunities emerge over the next decade
- An independent multi-stakeholder advisory council, comprised of trusted representatives, would provide advice and oversight to the Government on just transition. Through such a body, unions could continue to play an important role in policy development and delivery, respecting their deep knowledge of the issues, relationship with workers, existing networks, and long-term commitments to the workers, families, and communities
- The Government of Canada would work with partners to evaluate, assess, and report on the effectiveness of the plan and the phase-out’s actual impacts on workers and communities—from 2019 to 2030 and beyond
- Annual public reporting and a detailed report to Parliament every five years would ensure accountability and transparency
Recommendation 2: Include provisions for just transition in federal environmental and labour legislation and regulations, as well as relevant intergovernmental agreements
- New government actions must be robust and difficult to reverse, grounded by new legislative, regulatory, or intergovernmental obligations
- Including just transition provisions in relevant agreements between federal and provincial governments would demonstrate clear commitment and transparency, for example:
- equivalency agreements under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999
- infrastructure bilateral agreements
- labour market development agreements
- Widespread support for continued climate change action is at risk of eroding if strong just transition provisions are not embedded in climate change and labour policy
Recommendation 3: Establish a targeted, long-term research fund for studying the impact of the coal phase-out and the transition to a low-carbon economy.
- Academic studies can provide essential longitudinal analysis of phase-out impacts, transition support outcomes, and help ensure that best practices are widely shared
- The focus would be on longitudinal, socioeconomic research to assess the effectiveness of governmental planning and programming, in addition to the impacts on workers, their families, and their communities
- Such studies would support a multi-disciplinary and multi-stakeholder network to encourage sharing of information
Ensure locally available supports
Recommendation 4: Fund the establishment and operation of locally-driven transition centres in affected communities.
- The Government of Canada would work with provinces, municipalities, regional organizations, employers, and unions to establish transition centres
- Based on the lessons learned from earlier transition centres, affected workers would benefit the most from transition centres that:
- are launched before job losses
- are open for at least two years post phase-out
- involve a wide range of stakeholders in their management and operation
- are staffed with local residents and experts, who can build face-to-face relationships with workers and families
- create a single hub that provides a wide range of services, such as re-employment support (e.g., improving numeracy and literacy, writing resumes, starting a small business), training, and social support services
- provide workers, families, and communities with the information they need to make sound decisions
- provide financial advice and social and health services, including programs and counselling for families and youth, substance-abuse and addiction, and mental health
- serve to connect affected workers with employment opportunities stemming from regional economic development and diversification
Just transition supports for workers
- Workers made responsible decisions to work in the coal industry based on information available to them at the time about the planned lifespan of generating stations or mines. They chose to work in this sector because of the anticipated stability. Coal workers made long-term financial and life decisions based on what they understood to be a sound career choice
- A just transition will require the Government of Canada to provide targeted programs and services to coal workers whose timelines to retirement have changed, and to workers who will need to find new employment
- Federal and provincial governments have shared responsibilities in these areas and must work together to ensure that workers have the supports needed both before and after job losses
- Supports must be flexible and enable workers to make the decisions that are most appropriate for their circumstances. The timing of supports, for example, will need to be context specific, as some job losses will happen closer to or after 2030, while some workers, predominantly in Alberta, are already losing their jobs
- Affected workers need to be able to access transition measures with ease, and eligibility should be inclusive. Excessive complexity in support-program application processes and eligibility criteria can be overwhelming and burdensome. Employers must also provide sufficient flexibility to ensure that workers can access some types of support (e.g., training) while still employed in their current job
What we heard
Many of Canada’s coal workers are the second or third generation in their family to work in the coal industry. They are not only proud of this legacy, which helped build a prosperous nation, but are proud of their current contributions to providing affordable and reliable electricity in their home province. Many are now frustrated that the coal sector is not only being phased out but also disparaged as “dirty”.
Supporting workers close to retirement will be a significant challenge, as most employers reported a significant proportion of workers over the age of fifty. Older workers emphasized what the phase-out means for their planned retirement. Many feel vulnerable in the job market—often having not applied for a new job in decades—and are not in a position to retire early. While workers approaching retirement recognize that their employers will be hesitant to retrain them, many are hopeful that, if they must retire early, there will be ways to do so without penalty.
One worker looked at the lifespan of the generating station and how many years he had to retirement as factors in a decision to take on more debt to expand his family farm, and thus sustain his family in retirement. To pay off the debt on his farm, he needs the ten years of income that he would have received if the generating station were allowed to continue to its expected end-of-life date.
For those workers who will need to find new jobs, many indicated they will require income support. Through emotional and personal stories, workers shared their hardships following previous industry closures, including the hardship of sudden and unexpected job loss, receiving bad financial advice, and experiencing pension problems. Workers called for adjustments to how the Government of Canada views and delivers Canada’s Employment Insurance (EI) program. They believe that existing income programs may not be enough to help them succeed through the transition. Workers also commented on the complexity and inequity of EI.
They fear that if they lose their jobs, they will face penalties on their severance packages and lose their health plan benefits. Workers in the prairies who are also farmers are concerned that EI will penalize them for having multiple sources of income. For many, working in the coal industry effectively keeps their farms viable. Some suggested that EI is too complicated and that it works for government and not the people it was meant to support. Adverse financial outcomes of the coal phase-out are inconsistent with a just transition. Through improved support programs, workers could and should remain financially secure.
Regular EI benefits
- EI provides regular benefits to individuals who lose their job through no fault of their own when they are available for and able to work, but are unable to find a job
- The basic rate is 55% of the recipient’s average insurable weekly earnings, up to a maximum amount ($51,700 annually, as of January 1, 2018)
- Recipients can receive EI from 14 weeks to a maximum of 45 weeks
- EI benefits are taxable, no matter what type of benefits received; federal and provincial or territorial taxes, where applicable, are deducted from payments
Affected workers are likely to face challenges getting retrained or furthering their education. Ideally, they would use their existing skills and earn comparable wages and benefits. If they need to gain additional skills, they face significant barriers, including the financial and personal costs of leaving their families and jobs for extended periods to retrain or go to school. Workers called for support to retrain and receive education in their communities, preferably before they are laid off.
There are a number of new jobs that can be created with the development of new power-generating facilities such as wind, solar, tidal and geothermal. These new renewable energy projects should be encouraged through infrastructure investment specific to the affected communities.
– Building and skilled-trades representative from NS
Some workers are now looking to gain the necessary skills to prepare for careers in different sectors. Workers are also looking for accreditation for their existing skills, which will make it easier to transition into other jobs. Workers who have only ever had one employer and did not receive external training or education called for ways to have their many hard-earned skills formally certified, as their training and skills are often not recognized outside the company.
We all wish that we won't have to go down this road, but it will happen. It must be done with the least amount of preventable negative impact to everyone involved.
– Generating station worker from Cape Breton, NS
We also heard about opportunities to build relationships with unions and educational institutions, such as creating specialized educational programs, full or part-time, at community colleges, universities, or through distance education.
Moreover, information is not readily available about the skillsets of affected workers, or local and regional job prospects. This frustrates attempts to match laid-off workers with future employers. Workers and community and labour representatives called forbetter and more accessible labour market information, to help workers and employers identify viable options for what jobs they should transition into, as well as opportunities for communities and local employers to make the most of a highly-skilled workforce. Workers being laid off have a set of unique skills that could be more effectively matched with workforce opportunities.
Coal workers have a good skill set. We need to connect them to an industry that sees the potential of a displaced, highly skilled workforce.
– Representative from Hanna, AB
We were also reminded by many stakeholders that employers must play a key role in a successful transition for workers. In addition to ensuring that every employee has access to current and accurate information as the transition progresses, employers can provide their current workers with the ability to have their skills recognized or modify work hours to support employees who want to upgrade their skills prior to layoff. Employers must also play an active role in ensuring that older workers can have a successful path to a dignified retirement.
Workers likewise face difficulties navigating the rapidly evolving labour market. Some workers have only had one employer since finishing their education. Repeatedly, workers emphasized they are hoping for good, unionized jobs that will ensure stability and certainty for themselves and their families. Many workers expressed uncertainty about what jobs to apply to or to retrain for, particularly if their mobility is limited by spousal employment, or farm or community commitments. Affected workers have a strong work ethic and are highly motivated, but need better access to the tools and supports that will guide them to new opportunities.
While workers had innovative ideas about jobs in the new economy, particularly in retrofits and environmental assessment, they also called for support to pursue jobs outside of the low-carbon economy since there are not always direct linkages to jobs in the clean growth sector. Wind and solar facilities create jobs in the construction phase, but there are very few ongoing, permanent jobs when these facilities are operational. To illustrate this point, we received comments about how there are no parking lots at wind farms, but coal-fired generating stations have large, full parking lots every day of the week.
There will, however, be new employment opportunities in some affected communities when converting power plants to burn natural gas, reusing fly ash, reclaiming mines, and decommissioning generating stations.
Many workers expressed frustration at the prospect of uprooting their families for jobs elsewhere or travelling long distances to work. They are attached to their communities, their spouses are employed in the community, and they are often volunteers for essential services (e.g., firefighting) in their local area. The devastating loss on the value of a worker’s home in a coal community facing economic downturn is also a major worry. Workers are calling for ways to either continue living in their communities or relocate without facing devastating financial losses.
What will we do for work? Where will we live? What are our options? We are afraid the town will die.
– Community member, Coronach, SK
Based on what we heard, we recommend that the Government of Canada:
Provide workers a pathway to retirement
Recommendation 5: Create a pension bridging program for workers who will retire earlier than planned due to the coal phase out
- This program would provide a financial bridge to retirement without compromising workers’ earnings and retirement benefits.
- How this program approaches pension bridging will vary depending on the type of each workplace plan. The program will need to be developed in close collaboration with unions, provincial governments and employers.
Transition workers to sustainable employment
Recommendation 6: Create a detailed and publicly available inventory with labour market information pertaining to coal workers, such as skills profiles, demographics, locations, and current and potential employers
- A broad inventory would serve two main purposes:
- provide a baseline of labour market information
- be the starting point for a job bank to help match workers’ existing skillsets with potential new employment opportunities, thereby helping workers make informed decisions about retraining or additional education
- This inventory, or products based on it, would be developed in partnership with employers, unions, provinces, and municipalities, and be made available to workers, employers, transition centres, and researchers studying coal phase-out transition, while respecting privacy restrictions.
- By using this inventory, affected workers would have access to important information to assess future needs and opportunities, as well as to facilitate connections with potential employers.
Recommendation 7: Create a comprehensive funding program for workers staying in the labour market to address their needs across the stages of securing a new job, including income support, education and skills building, re-employment, and mobility.
- This fund could be a federal program or the Government could provide funding to the provinces to administer.
- A single window would provide workers with multiple streams of support to address a broad range of needs.
- An income support stream would address workers’ concerns about receiving adequate support as they transition to new employment:
- provide affected workers with EI benefits of up to 75% of income for two years, regardless of home province
- exclude severance and income support benefits that affected workers receive when calculating EI benefits
- provide wage top-ups of up to 90% of previously earned income for up to two years for affected workers who go back to work but in lower-wage jobs
- Provide funding to continue private healthcare plan coverage for up to two years.
- An education and skills building stream would provide workers up to $20,000 for a maximum of two years to retrain, upgrade skills, and pursue additional education.
- This could be delivered by a university, community college, or union-affiliated training centre.
- The funding would be available to workers while they are still working and cover a variety of expenses, such as tuition, books, and travel.
- A re-employment stream would connect affected workers with employers, using the inventory developed as part of Recommendation 6 and prioritizing jobs in the new economy whenever possible.
- This action could include renewed support for sector councils to facilitate the recognition of affected workers’ current skills, including through formal certificates. This could be done through transition centres, working in partnership with employers, unions, and others.
- A mobility stream would compensate those who relocate or travel long distances for new work. This program would help to offset the expenses of having to travel or relocate for new employment:
- Provide up to $10,000 to those who relocate permanently; or, cover mileage for those who travel long distances for work (more than 250 km one way), consistent with the National Joint Council’s allowances or the Canada Revenue Agency’s non-taxable allowances, for up to two years.
- If a provincial government also provides travel or relocation assistance, any additional federal support should not replace or reduce the provincial assistance provided.
Just transition supports for communities
- Affected families and communities need local supports in place to address their transition-related needs—everything from business parks, bypasses and other infrastructure investments, to better financial, social, and health supports, and funding for economic planning and stabilization. Diversifying these communities through sound planning and investments will be key to their long-term prosperity
- Impacts on communities will vary based on local circumstances, such as proximity to other cities or industries, relative dependency on coal for their tax base, timing of the coal phase-out, and community capacity. Flexible, community-based supports are essential for all affected communities to plan and achieve success
- Given their respective jurisdictions, the federal, provincial, and municipal governments must work together to ensure that a broad range of social services are fully funded and effectively delivered
- The Federation of Canadian Municipalities is a trusted partner that can work within and bring together affected communities
- First Nation and Métis communities may also be affected. Given Canada’s commitment to reconciliation and advancing nation-to-nation relationships, it will be important to work in partnership with affected Indigenous communities to minimize any adverse impacts the phase-out may have
- With care and support, affected communities and families can be the spokespeople of a successful and effective transition to the low-carbon economy. Otherwise, they will face hardships and likely oppose other efforts to reduce GHG emissions
- Leadership and innovation from affected community and family members, especially youth, will be essential to drive economic diversification, strengthen networks, and promote overall community wellbeing
What we heard
Community members are proud of where they live. They told us that their ties to these places and their connection to coal help keep their villages, towns, and cities thriving. Many coal workers and their spouses are volunteer firefighters and hockey coaches, and contribute considerably to their municipal tax base through property taxes, as do coal mines and generating stations. Workers and families want to stay together in the communities where they live. While some workers may have to travel long distances for alternate work, this is not the preferred solution. It is not enough to point to locations where jobs exist; ideally, workers should have good jobs in the communities where they live.
People do not want to commute to jobs out west. They will miss out on watching their children grow up. There are social implications to this.
– Community member in Trenton, NS
Rural and remote communities face added challenges due to fewer economic opportunities and distance from amenities and services. Community members openly shared many common challenges that they face including:
- understaffed municipalities
- attracting and keeping youth and young families
- decreasing values of homes
- loss of public services, directly tied to overburdened municipal tax bases, such as emergency services, parks, and recreational facilities
- infrastructure maintenance and upgrading
- retention of health and social service professionals
- keeping schools and hospitals open
Many people talked about the added burden that the coal transition will place on their communities. Economic development officers face challenges combating negative perceptions of communities in transition that deter investment and business development. They are afraid they will lose local services when revenue from coal is gone forever, which can be up to 75% of a community’s tax base. With declining revenues, some coal communities will struggle to maintain and upgrade the infrastructure necessary to both attract and retain residents and industry.
How can we attract young families and entrepreneurs if some areas still use dial-up? We need broadband.
– Municipal representative, Bathurst, NB
To attract new residents, industries, and businesses, communities recognize that they need to be sustainable, with vibrant and increasingly diverse economies, and modern infrastructure and services. Many municipal officials acknowledged that coordinated action within and across regions will be important to achieving these outcomes, as will partnerships with civil society and non-governmental organizations.
Ripple effects of the coal phase-out are pervasive in coal communities. Impacts on workers and communities are entangled with impacts on families and home life.
Financial hardships stemming from decreased or lost income and decreased home values add to the suffering of workers and their families. People expressed concerns with financial advice and services, and stressed the importance of support options and flexibility in the face of unforeseen job losses.
The company [I worked for] brought in financial advisors [to give advice on] what to do with severance. They advised me to put it in RRSPs. Shortly afterwards, I have a tax bill: $22,000. The next year: $44,000. So, where did you think the money came from? Back to the severance, back to the RRSPs. It was bad advice.
– Former Coal Worker, Sydney, NS, reflecting on a transition he went through nearly two decades ago
We heard grave concerns about how uncertainty and stress will negatively affect mental health and wellbeing, including children. In the eyes of coal communities, increased levels of substance abuse, poor mental health, family violence and divorce are directly correlated to the phase-out and exacerbated by limited access to mental health and social supports.
To address these challenges, communities see opportunities in transition centres, broadband internet connectivity, tourism, recreation centres, small-business supports like incubators, increased capacity for planning and delivering locally-driven ideas, and regional planning. Additional resources will help them innovate and find ways of developing and diversifying their economies. Respondents stressed the importance of community-specific and community-driven analysis in order to truly understand the impacts and opportunities of the coal phase-out. Ultimately, municipalities want decision makers to understand the breadth of these impacts and help residents to thrive through this upcoming transition.
Transition support should simultaneously consider job creation in the clean economy, opportunities to reduce poverty and increase equality, and the integration of Indigenous reconciliation.
– Labour representative, Dartmouth, NS
Based on what we heard, we recommend that the Government of Canada:
Invest in community infrastructure
Recommendation 8: Identify, prioritize, and fund local infrastructure projects in affected communities
- Working with municipal, Indigenous, and provincial governments, the Government of Canada should look for ways to fund local infrastructure projects, including through existing programs like the Investing in Canada plan.
- New local infrastructure projects should help offset employment losses from the coal phase-out in the short term and support economic growth over the medium to long term.
- Wherever possible, and likely through local transition centres, connect affected coal workers and families to new employment opportunities from infrastructure projects.
Fund community planning, collaboration, diversification, and stabilization
Recommendation 9: Establish a dedicated, comprehensive, inclusive, and flexible just transition funding program for affected communities
- Communities need new funding for a variety of purposes, including undertaking planning activities like feasibility studies, community workshops, and action plans.
- A dedicated fund could provide bridge funding to municipalities experiencing tax-base shortfalls and lost economic activity caused by the coal phase-out. Doing so would enable continued local services, support communities to diversify, and incentivize communities to work together, whenever possible.
- Managed by a trusted partner like the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, this fund would offer a single window for communities to access supports, with multiple streams that address the range of needs:
- Capacity funding to enable affected communities to plan for the future, including funding for communities or regions to hire transition coordinators
- Stabilization funding to help affected communities continue to deliver essential services, diversify their economies, create new job opportunities, and realize their economic potential
- Collaboration funding to bring affected communities together, possibly through a series of in-person workshops, and create a network of municipalities to share information, best practices, and lessons learned
Recommendation 10: Meet directly with affected communities to learn about their local priorities and to connect them with federal programs that could support their goals
- Affected communities would benefit from government-initiated discussions regarding opportunities to access existing funds, services, and programs. Doing so would help address the administrative burden of identifying, understanding, and applying for dozens of distinct initiatives.
- Wherever possible, multiple departments should travel together to meet with affected communities. This will reduce consultation fatigue and be the best use of communities’ time, given limited resources.
- Representatives of the Government of Canada’s Clean Growth Hub, which provides centralized advice on clean technology programs and services, should visit all the affected communities to explore how the Government’s clean technology programs could fund local priorities.
Report a problem or mistake on this page
- Date modified: