Species at Risk Act annual report for 2019: chapter 3
3. Listing of species at risk

3.1 Listing process
The listing process refers to the addition (or non-addition), the reclassification, or the removal of a species from Schedule 1. Once the Minister receives the COSEWIC assessment, the Minister has 90 days to post a response statement on the Species at Risk Public Registry indicating how they intend on responding to each assessment and, if possible, providing timelines for action.
The Government of Canada has a duty to consult and, where appropriate, accommodate Indigenous groups when actions might adversely impact potential or established Aboriginal or Treaty Rights. Therefore, during this 90-day period, the relevant competent minister carries out an internal review to determine the level of public, stakeholders and Indigenous consultation required. The relevant competent minister also conducts the socio-economic analysis necessary to inform the listing decision. Timelines for action and the scope of consultations included in the response statement are based on the results of this initial review.
All of the species that COSEWIC assessed as being at risk prior to October 1999 were included at proclamation on SARA’s Schedule 2 (endangered and threatened) and Schedule 3 (special concern). COSEWIC reassesses these species using current criteria as part of the process to determine if they should be considered for the addition to Schedule 1. All Schedule 2 species have since been reassessed by COSEWIC. For Schedule 3, taxonomy for the four remaining species needs to be clarified before they can be reassessed by COSEWIC.
Figure 1 outlines the species listing process under SARA. Table 2 (see section 3.4) provides the status of the listing process for each batch of assessed species.
Figure 3. The species listing process under SARA
The Minister of the Environment receives species assessments from COSEWIC at least once per year.
↓
The competent departments undertake an internal review to determine the extent of public consultation and socio-economic analysis necessary to inform the listing decision.
↓
Within 90 days of receipt of the species assessments prepared by COSEWIC, the Minister publishes a response statement on the SARA Public Registry that indicates how he or she intends to respond to the assessment and, to the extent possible, provides timelines for action.
↓
Where appropriate, the competent departments undertake consultations and any other relevant analysis needed to prepare the advice to the Minister.
↓
The Minister forwards the assessment to the Governor in Council for receipt. This generally occurs within twelve months of posting the response statement, unless further consultation is necessary.
↓
Within nine months of receiving the assessment, the Governor in Council, on the recommendation of the Minister, may decide whether or not to list the species under Schedule 1of SARA or refer the assessment back to COSEWIC for further information or consideration.
↓
Once a species is added to Schedule 1, it benefits from the applicable provisions of SARA.
Note: More information can be found on the SARA Public Registry.
Prior to undertaking public, stakeholders and Indigenous consultations and socio-economic analyses, DFO develops science advice in the form of a Recovery Potential Assessment (RPA) for aquatic species that have been assessed by COSEWIC as threatened, endangered or extirpated. The scientific information in an RPA includes species status, threats and limiting factors to the survival and recovery of the species, recovery targets, and feasibility of recovery in given scenarios. The RPA informs the development of advice to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans regarding the listing of aquatic species under SARA and is used when analyzing the socio-economic impacts, and during subsequent consultations. The RPA also provides advice needed to meet other requirements of the Act, including recovery planning and permitting decisions.

Photo:© D.A. Watkinson
In 2019, DFO held 12 RPA peer-review meetings:
- River Darter: Great Lakes-Upper St. Lawrence populations
- Pacific Grey Whale: West coast/ Lumpfish: Atlantic Ocean
- Lake Sturgeon: Western Hudson Bay populations
- Lake Sturgeon: Saskatchewan-Nelson River populations
- Lake Sturgeon: Great Lakes-Upper St. Lawrence populations
- Lake Sturgeon: Great Lakes-Upper St. Lawrence populations (second meeting)
- Coho Salmon: Interior Fraser River population/ Chinook Salmon: Okanagan population
- Channel Darter: Lake Erie and Lake Ontario populations
- Fraser River Sockeye Salmon: Ten designatable units
- Pygmy Whitefish: Great Lakes-Upper St. Lawrence population
- Fraser River Chinook Salmon: Eleven designatable units
- Westslope Cutthroat Trout: Saskatchewan-Nelson River population
3.2 Federal government response to COSEWIC assessments
In November 2017, the Minister posted the new SARA policy, Timeline for amendments to Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act. This policy applies to all species assessments received by the Minister from the date of publication of the policy onward. The policy includes a commitment to report when timelines cannot be met. The report is to explain the status of the species assessments that the Minister received and that have not yet been submitted to the Governor in Council. The response statements for the first batch of species to which this policy will apply (Batch 16) were posted on January 11, 2019. This included the response statements for 26 confirmations of status for species already on Schedule 1. The response statements for the remaining 49 species at risk explained that they were eligible for a change on Schedule 1 and provided timelines for action, to the extent possible.
In October 2019, the Minister received COSEWIC’s assessments for 52 out of the 56 assessed species in Batch 17. Of these assessments, 27 terrestrial and 25 aquatic wildlife were assessed as species at risk.
COSEWIC Risk Status | Taxon | English legal name | Scientific name |
---|---|---|---|
Normal consultations | |||
Endangered | Mosses |
Carey’s Small Limestone Moss |
Seligeria careyana |
Endangered | Mosses |
Dalton’s Moss |
Daltonia splachnoides |
Endangered | Mosses |
Drooping–leaved Beard–moss |
Oxystegus recurvifolius |
Endangered | Vascular plants |
Columbia Quillwort |
Isoetes minima |
Endangered | Vascular plants |
Dwarf Hesperochiron |
Hesperochiron pumilus |
Endangered | Vascular plants |
Hairy Valerian |
Valeriana edulis ssp. ciliata |
Endangered | Vascular plants |
Hairy Paintbrush |
Castilleja tenuis |
Endangered | Vascular plants |
Ute Ladies’–tresses |
Spiranthes diluvialis |
Threatened | Fishes (freshwater) |
Lake Chub (Liard Hot Springs populations) |
Couesius plumbeus |
Threatened | Fishes (freshwater) |
Lake Chub (Atlin Warm Springs populations) |
Couesius plumbeus |
Threatened | Lichens |
White–rimmed Shingle Lichen |
Fuscopannaria leucosticta |
Special Concern | Arthropods |
American Bumble Bee |
Bombus pensylvanicus |
Special Concern | Arthropods |
Yellow Scarab Hunter Wasp |
Dielis pilipes |
From Endangered to Special Concern | Reptiles |
Greater Short-horned Lizard |
Phrynosoma hernandesi |
From Threatened to Special Concern | Mammals (marine) |
Fin Whale (Pacific population) |
Balaenoptera physalus |
From Threatened to Special Concern | Vascular plants |
Goldenseal |
Hydrastis Canadensis |
Extended consultations | |||
Endangered | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (Lower Fraser, Stream, Summer (Upper Pitt) population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Endangered | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (Middle Fraser, Stream, Spring population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Endangered | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (Middle Fraser, Stream, Fall population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Endangered | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (Upper Fraser, Stream, Spring population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Endangered | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (South Thompson, Stream, Summer 1.2 population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Endangered | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (North Thompson, Stream, Spring population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Endangered | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (North Thompson, Stream, Summer population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Endangered | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (East Vancouver Island, Stream, Spring population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Endangered | Fishes (marine) |
Shortfin Mako (Atlantic population) |
Isurus oxyrinchus |
Endangered | Mammals (marine) |
Sei Whale (Atlantic population) |
Balaenoptera borealis |
Threatened | Birds |
Hudsonian Godwit |
Limosa haemastica |
Threatened | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (Lower Fraser, Ocean, Fall population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Threatened | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (Lower Fraser, Stream, Summer population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Threatened | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (Middle Fraser, Stream, Spring (MFR+GStr) population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Threatened | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (Middle Fraser, Stream, Summer population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Threatened | Vascular plants |
Black Ash |
Fraxinus nigra |
Special Concern | Fishes (Anadromous) |
Chinook Salmon (Lower Fraser, Stream, Spring population) |
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha |
Special Concern | Vascular plants |
Yukon Draba |
Draba yukonensis |
From Special Concern to Threatened | Lichens |
Cryptic Paw Lichen |
Nephroma occultum |
Status change for which there will be no consultations | |||
From Threatened to Endangered | Fishes (freshwater) |
Rainbow Smelt |
Osmerus mordax |
From Threatened to Endangered | Fishes (freshwater) |
Rainbow Smelt |
Osmerus mordax |
Status confirmed – no consultation | |||
Extirpated | Arthropods |
Frosted Elfin |
Callophrys irus |
Extirpated | Arthropods |
Karner Blue |
Plebejus samuelis |
Extirpated | Fishes (freshwater) |
Gravel Chub |
Erimystax x-punctatus |
Extirpated | Fishes (freshwater) |
Paddlefish |
Polyodon spathula |
Extirpated | Reptiles |
Pygmy Short-horned Lizard |
Phrynosoma douglasii |
Endangered | Arthropods |
Rapids Clubtail |
Phanogomphus quadricolor |
Endangered | Fishes (freshwater) |
Nooksack Dace |
Rhinichthys cataractae |
Endangered | Mammals |
Vancouver Island Marmot |
Marmota vancouverensis |
Endangered | Vascular plants |
Brook Spike-primrose |
Epilobium torreyi |
Threatened | Reptiles |
Wood Turtle |
Glyptemys insculpta |
Special Concern | Arthropods |
Pale Yellow Dune Moth |
Copablepharon grandis |
Special Concern | Arthropods |
Pygmy Snaketail |
Ophiogomphus howei |
Special Concern | Mammals |
Polar Bear |
Ursus maritimus |
Special Concern | Mammals (Marine) |
Fin Whale (Atlantic population) |
Balaenoptera physalus |
Special Concern | Mammals (marine) |
Sowerby's Beaked Whale |
Mesoplodon bidens |
3.3. Public consultations
Public consultations provide the Minister with a better understanding of the potential social and economic impacts of possible changes to Schedule 1, and of the potential consequences of adding or not adding a species to the List. Information collected during consultations is used to inform the Minister’s recommendations to the Governor in Council on amending Schedule 1 of SARA.
In 2019, ECCC carried out consultations for 21 terrestrial species for which status assessments had been received from COSEWIC as part of Batch 16. The document titled Consultation on Amending the List of Species under the Species at Risk Act: Terrestrial Species – January 2019 was posted on the Species at Risk Public Registry.
In 2019, DFO consulted Canadians on the possible listing on Schedule 1 of eight aquatic species. Consultations included those with other government departments, wildlife management boards, stakeholders, Indigenous groups and non-governmental organizations. Public consultations were also facilitated by inviting respondents to contribute to a web-based, species-specific survey hosted on the Species at Risk Public Registry.
3.4. Listing decisions
Governor in Council decisions on whether or not to amend Schedule 1 according to the COSEWIC assessments are published as orders amending Schedule 1 of SARA in the Canada Gazette, and include Regulatory Impact Analysis Statements. Decisions to not add a species at risk to Schedule 1 of SARA or to refer the matter back to COSEWIC are published in the Canada Gazette with an explanatory note.
In 2019, final listing decisions were made for 40 terrestrial species. There were two orders amending Schedule 1 of SARA published in the Canada Gazette in 2019. Of the 40 terrestrial species included in these orders, 22 wildlife species were newly added to Schedule 1. There were 15 wildlife species whose status on Schedule 1 changed. Another wildlife species (Toothcup), which had previously been on Schedule 1 as one designatable unit (or wildlife species), was split into two wildlife species. One of these retained the same status as the previously listed parent; the other was added at a lower risk level. Another species, the Pygmy Pocket Moss, was removed from the Schedule 1 of SARA because it had been re-assessed as “not at risk.”
Batch (year) of Minister's receipt of assessments |
Total number of species assessed | Species at risk | Confirmation of current status | Added to Schedule 1 | Uplisted (to a higher risk category) | Downlisted (to a lower risk category) | Not listed | Referred back | Decision pending |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Proclamation) |
– |
233 |
– |
233 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
Batch 1 (2004) |
115 |
95 |
4 |
75 |
0 |
0 |
8b |
8b |
0 |
Batch 2 (2004) |
59 |
51 (+9) |
0 |
47 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
0 |
Batch 3 (2005) |
73 |
59 |
4 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
Batch 4 (2006) |
68 (+5 c) |
59 |
4 |
39 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
Emergency Assessment (2006) |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Batch 5 (2007) |
64 |
53 |
8 |
30 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
Batch 6 (2008) |
46 |
39 |
14 |
20 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
Batch 7 (2009) |
48 |
46 |
17 |
20 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Batch 8 (2010) |
79 |
78 |
34 |
18 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
14 |
Batch 9 (2011) |
92 |
81 |
31 |
13 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
16 |
Batch 10 (2012) |
64 |
57 |
28 |
10 |
6 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
Emergency Assessment (2012) |
3 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Batch 11 (2013) |
73 |
67 |
32 |
18 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
Batch 12 (2014) |
56 |
56 |
21 |
16 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
Batch 13 (2015) |
56 |
54 |
24 |
18 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
Batch 14 (2016) |
45 |
38 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
Batch 15 (2017) |
73 |
56 |
17 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
28 |
Emergency Assessments (2018) |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
Batch 16 (2018) |
88 |
75 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
49 |
Batch 17 (2019) |
56 |
52 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
a The total includes species assessed for the first time, species being reassessed and previously assessed species that have been split into more than one designatable unit.
b The totals listed as “Uplisted” (to a higher risk category) and “Downlisted” (to a lower risk category) also account for species that were subsequently split into more than one designatable unit with a corresponding change in status and were therefore treated as reclassifications (“uplisted” or “downlisted”). In addition, removals from Schedule 1 are counted here as “downlisted”.
c Includes four wildlife species that were not listed for further consideration from Batch 1 and reconsidered in Batch 2, and five additional wildlife species when one designatable unit received by COSEWIC was split into six for listing.
Final listing decisions were made for 32 aquatic species via two orders published in the Canada Gazette, Part II. Based on a request from COSEWIC in light of new information received, one order referred the assessment of one species (Shortfin Mako) back to COSEWIC for further consideration. Of the 31 aquatic species included in the second order, which amended Schedule 1 of SARA: 18 species were newly added to Schedule 1; nine were reclassifications; and four were the subject of changes to their recognized designatable units. The decision on the reclassification of another species, which had been received with these, remains pending. The Governor in Council received the assessment of the Rocky Mountain Ridged Mussel in February 2019. It is on Schedule 1 as Special Concern, and COSEWIC assessed it as Endangered. During the public comment period that followed the proposed status change, stakeholders raised concerns. As a result, officials are gathering additional science information.
3.5. SARA Schedule 1 current status
When SARA was proclaimed in June 2003, Schedule 1 included 233 species. Starting in 2005, species have been added to the list every year, except in 2008, 2015 and 2016. As of December 31, 2019, Schedule 1 listed a total of 622 species.
- 23 extirpated species
- 273 endangered species
- 144 threatened species
- 182 species of special concern
Risk status | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Extirpated | Endangered | Threatened | Special Concern | Total |
June 2003 (proclamation) | 17 | 107 | 67 | 42 | 233 |
2005 | 4 | 47 | 30 | 31 | 112 |
2006 | 0 | 18 | 14 | 12 | 44 |
2007 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 11 | 36 |
2008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2009 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 22 |
2010 | 0 | 11a | 8 | 4 | 23a |
2011 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 23 |
2012 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 18 |
2013 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
2014 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2017 | 1 | 18 | 15 | 20 | 54 |
2018 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 17 | 44 |
2019 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 40 |
Total | 23 | 273 | 144 | 182 | 622b |
a The Eastern Foxsnake was split into two populations. The new populations inherited the species’ status on Schedule 1 of SARA before it was split, and both new populations were uplisted in 2010. For the purpose of this table, one of the new Eastern Foxsnake populations was treated as an addition to Schedule 1.
b Although the total number of listed species (622) is correct, the totals for each risk category (i.e. extirpated, endangered, threatened and special concern) are slightly different than the actual number of species for each of the categories listed on Schedule 1 because the values presented in this table do not reflect status changes (i.e., uplisting or downlisting of a species).
Rare aquatic lichen makes a comeback at Fundy National Park

Eastern Waterfan is a species of aquatic lichen listed on Schedule 1 of SARA. It is endemic to eastern North America, and in Canada it is only found in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Quebec. It is a good indicator of aquatic health as it requires cool, clean water, is sensitive to disturbance, and is slow to establish.
In 2013, the status report published by COSEWIC stated that the New Brunswick population of the Eastern Waterfan was believed to only be represented by four brooks, two being in Fundy National Park. The report also stated that the Canadian population was unlikely to exceed 2000 colonies. However, during the summer of 2019, Fundy National Park resource conservation staff conducted dedicated surveys in partnership with experts from the Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre (ACCDC). Fundy National Park and ACCDC staff went far off the beaten paths and deep into the park’s interior, and were amazed to find the Eastern Waterfan almost everywhere they looked. The focused searches with ACCDC led to the discovery of Eastern Waterfan growing in 24 additional brooks, with more than 1000 colonies represented.
The results provided valuable habitat information that was incorporated into the Recovery Strategy and Action Plan for the species. As of the end of the 2019 season, Eastern Waterfan is known to be found in 28 brooks in Fundy National Park, and represents approximately 50% of the entire known Canadian population. Fundy National Park staff look forward to expanding the search for this rare aquatic lichen to further our knowledge of its population, extent, and habitat requirements.