Species at Risk Act annual report for 2019: chapter 4

4. Recovery actions for species at risk

Photo of the Yellow Scarab Hunter Wasp
Yellow Scarab Hunter Wasp

Under SARA, the competent ministers must prepare recovery strategies and action plans for the species listed as extirpated, endangered or threatened, and management plans for those listed as special concern. Competent ministers must identify critical habitat in the recovery strategy or in an action plan to the extent possible based on the best available information. SARA defines “critical habitat” as the habitat that is necessary for the survival or recovery of a listed wildlife species and that is identified as the species’ critical habitat in the recovery strategy or in an action plan for the species.

Recovery planning documents are developed in cooperation with federal, provincial and territorial jurisdictions, Indigenous communities, stakeholders and the public. The proposed recovery strategies, action plans and management plans are posted on the Species at Risk Public Registry for a 60-day public comment period. The competent ministers consider comments and make changes where appropriate. The final recovery strategy, action plan or management plan, as applicable, is to be published on the public registry within 30 days after the expiry of the public comment period. Five years after a recovery strategy, action plan or management plan comes into effect, the competent minister must report on the progress made towards achieving the stated objectives.

4.1. Recovery strategies

Recovery strategies have the following steps:

  1. Identify threats to the species and its habitat
  2. Identify critical habitat to the extent possible
  3. Set population and distribution objectives for the species

In 2019, ECCC posted proposed recovery strategies for four species and final recovery strategies for 23 species. DFO posted amended proposed recovery strategies for four species and amended final recovery strategies for 12 species. Parks Canada contributed to the development of the recovery strategies where the Agency is competent for those species (indicated by a superscript "a" in Table 4 below). Parks Canada was not responsible for the posting of any recovery strategies in 2019.

Table 4: Species for which recovery strategies were posted in 2019, by lead competent department
Competent department Final recovery strategies: species Proposed recovery strategies: species
Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • Allegheny Mountain Dusky Salamander (Carolinian population)
  • American Chestnut
  • American Columbo
  • Batwing Vinyl Lichen
  • Bent Spike-rush (Southern Mountain population)
  • Bird's-foot Violet
  • Blue Racer
  • Desert Nightsnake
  • Eastern Persius Duskywing
  • Five-lined Skink (Carolinian population)a
  • Five-spotted Bogus Yucca Moth
  • Fowler's Toad
  • Frosted Elfin
  • Gattinger's Agalinis
  • Great Basin Gophersnake
  • Juniper Sedge
  • Karner Blue
  • Non-pollinating Yucca Moth
  • Prairie Skink
  • Rapids Clubtail
  • Western Rattlesnake
  • Wild Hyacintha
  • Yellow-breasted Chat virens subspeciesa
  • Hine’s Emerald
  • Hungerford’s Crawling Water Beetle
  • Red-headed Woodpeckera
  • Vancouver Island Marmot
Parks Canada Nil Nil
Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Recovery Strategy for Paxton Lake, Enos Lake, and Vananda Creek Stickleback Species Pairs (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in Canada:

  • Paxton Lake Benthic Threespine Stickleback
  • Paxton Lake Limnetic Threespine Stickleback
  • Enos Lake Benthic Threespine Stickleback
  • Enos Lake Limnetic Threespine Stickleback
  • Vananda Creek Benthic Threespine Stickleback
  • Vananda Creek Limnetic Threespine Stickleback

Recovery Strategy for the Northern Riffleshell, Snuffbox, Round Pigtoe, Salamander Mussel, and Rayed Bean in Canada

  • Northern Riffleshell
  • Snuffbox
  • Round Pigtoe
  • Salamander Mussel
  • Rayed Bean

Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Saskatchewan - Nelson River populations)a

  • Nooksack Dace
  • Salish Sucker
  • Striped Bass (St. Lawrence River population)
  • Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Saskatchewan -
  • Nelson River populations)a

a Parks Canada is also a competent department for this species, as it occurs in its lands/waters; and contributed to the development of the recovery strategy.

4.2 Action plans

An action plan identifies the conservation measures required to address the threats to the species and meet the population and distribution objectives outlined in the recovery strategy. An action plan may include an identification of the species’ critical habitat, to the extent possible, based on the best available information and consistent with the recovery strategy.

In 2019, ECCC posted a proposed action plan for one species and a final action plan for one species. DFO posted proposed action plans for four species and final action plans for four species. Parks Canada contributed to the development of action plans where the Agency is competent for those species (indicated by a superscript "b" in Table 5 below). Parks Canada was not responsible for the posting of  any action plans in 2019.

Table 5: Species for which action plans were posted in 2019
Competent department Final action plans Proposed action plans

Environment and Climate Change Canada

Porsild’s Bryumb

Blanding’s Turtle, Nova Scotia populationb

Parks Canada

Nil

 Nil

Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Vancouver Lamprey

Westslope Cutthroat Trout (Saskatchewan - Nelson River populations)b

Atlantic Salmon - Inner Bay of Fundy populationb

Leatherback Sea Turtle (Pacific Population)b

Basking Shark (Pacific population)b

Action Plan to Reduce the Impact of Noise on the Beluga Whale (Delphinapterus leucas) and Other Marine Mammals at Risk in the St. Lawrence Estuary

Striped Bass (St. Lawrence River population)

Westslope Cutthroat Trout
(Saskatchewan - Nelson River populations)b

b Parks Canada is also a competent department for this species, as it occurs in its lands/waters, and the agency contributed to the development of the action plan.

4.3 Management plans

Species of special concern are those that may become threatened or endangered because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats. SARA requires competent ministers to prepare management plans for species of special concern. A management plan differs from a recovery strategy and an action plan, in that it identifies conservation measures needed to prevent a species of special concern from becoming threatened or endangered, but does not identify critical habitat. Where appropriate, these management plans may be prepared for multiple species on an ecosystem or landscape level.

In 2019, ECCC posted proposed management plans for one species and final management plans for five species. DFO posted one proposed management plan and one final management plan. Parks Canada contributed to the development of management plans for species the Agency is competent for (indicated by a superscript "c" in Table 6 below). Parks Canada was not responsible for the posting of any management plans in 2019.

Table 6: Species for which management plans were posted in 2019
Competent department Final management plans Proposed management plans

Environment and Climate Change Canada

Band-tailed Pigeonc

Northern Map Turtlec

Threaded Vertigo

Weidemeyer's Admiral

Western Blue Flag

Lake Erie Watersnakec

Parks Canada Agency

Nil

Nil

Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Shorthead Sculpin

Bigmouth Buffalo (Saskatchewan - Nelson River populations)

c Parks Canada is also a competent department for this species, as it occurs in its lands/waters, and therefore contributed towards the development of the management plan.

4.4. Critical habitat

Critical habitat is habitat necessary to support the population and distribution objectives which are set out to assist the recovery and/or survival of listed species in Canada and established in the recovery strategy or action plan.

4.4.1. Identification and descriptions of critical habitat

In 2019, ECCC published final recovery strategies in which critical habitat was identified for 19 species, and proposed recovery strategies in which critical habitat was identified for four species. Parks Canada did not identify any critical habitat in either its recovery strategies or action plans for 2019. DFO published three amended recovery strategies and one final action plan in which critical habitat was identified for 13 species. In addition, DFO published two proposed amended recovery strategies, and two proposed (combined) recovery strategy/action plans in which critical habitat was identified for four species.

In accordance with subsection 58(2) of the Act, ECCC published eight descriptions of critical habitat in the Canada Gazette Part I in 2019 to protect critical habitat for Fowler’s Toad, Red Knot rufa subspecies, American Ginseng, Spotted Turtle, Great Basin Spadefoot, Pallid Bat, Western Tiger Salamander, and Northern Leopard Frog in a variety of federally protected areas, including Big Creek National Wildlife Area, Long Point National Wildlife Area, Moose River Migratory Bird Sanctuary, Boatswain Bay Migratory Bird Sanctuary, Akimiski Bird Sanctuary, Vaseux Bighorn National Wildlife Areas and Columbia National Wildlife Area.

4.4.2. Protection of critical habitat

In 2019, the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, made orders to protect the critical habitat of the Woodland Caribou (Boreal population) and the critical habitat of the Barrens Willow on federally administered lands, pursuant to section 58 of SARA. In addition, a progress report was published on the SAR Public Registry pursuant to s. 63 of SARA, to describe steps taken to protect critical habitat for the Woodland Caribou (Boreal population).

In 2019, Parks Canada protected critical habitat for ten species in 12 national parks, national park reserves and other lands/waters under the Agency’s administration:

DFO published 15 orders to protect critical habitat for the following aquatic species at risk:

In July 2019, DFO and the Canadian Coast Guard conducted a three-day ghost gear retrieval operation in the Gulf of St. Lawrence – Operation Ghost. Ghost gear refers to any fishing equipment that has been abandoned, lost, or even discarded in the oceans. The goal was to remove as much lost fishing gear as possible from the Gulf of St. Lawrence, which is considered to an area with known concentrations of ghost gear, in order to help prevent entanglements of marine mammals such as right whales and turtles. This resulted in DFO and the Canadian Coast Guard recovering over 100 snow crab traps and removing over 9 km of rope from the water.

To help in further protecting aquatic species at risk, DFO encourages people who are considering a project, to visit the Aquatic species at risk map website to locate these species and plan their project accordingly.

The provinces and territories are primarily responsible for the management of non-federal lands, natural resources and wildlife located on those lands. This includes the protection of the critical habitat of species at risk on non-federal lands (other than aquatic species) and implementation of protection measures through their own legislation and programs.  In 2019, the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change published a report on steps taken and protection of critical habitat for species at risk in Canada, to track and report on critical habitat protection for 213 terrestrial species at risk with critical habitat identified on non-federal lands.

4.5. Imminent threat assessments

Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae)
Since 2003, Wood Bison has been listed as Threatened on Schedule 1 of SARA, occurring in 12 free-ranging herds (also known as local populations) in Canada and totaling approximately 9000 individuals. Currently, Wood Bison occupy only 6% of their original range. The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and the Minister of Environment received requests from concerned First Nation communities seeking protection for the Wood Bison under SARA, specifically the Ronald Lake Bison Herd in Alberta. In July 2019, the Canada/Alberta Joint Review Panel (JRP) for the Frontier Oil Sands Mine Project recommended that ECCC complete the imminent threat assessment for the Wood Bison that was underway, so that the results of the assessment could inform federal decisions related to the Teck Resources Limited, Frontier Oil Sands Mine Project. 

In response to the requests from Indigenous communities and the JRP recommendation, in 2019, ECCC was finalizing an assessment to determine whether Wood Bison are facing imminent threats to their survival or recovery, based on the best available information to the department related to the status of Wood Bison and associated threats and incorporating Indigenous Knowledge.

Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
After consultation with the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, the Minister of Environment determined, based on a 2018 emergency assessment by COSEWIC and other science information, that Steelhead Trout (Thompson River population) and Steelhead Trout (Chilcotin River population) were facing imminent threat to survival. These wildlife species are experiencing significant population declines resulting from threats including diminishing habitat quality, both in marine and freshwater environments; and bycatch mortality from Pacific salmon fisheries. In July 2019, the Minister of Environment recommended to the Governor in Council (GiC) that both populations be listed as endangered under SARA. In considering a number of factors (including science advice, shared federal-provincial management and conservation, anticipated conservation outcomes and socio-economic costs and benefits under listing and not listing scenarios, and the results of consultations), the GiC decided not to list. Instead, actions to reduce the threats and recover these species are being taken under a comprehensive action plan developed collaboratively by the Government of Canada and the Province of British Columbia. In 2019, measures included: recreational fisheries closures in the Thompson and Chilcotin watersheds, rolling closures of commercial salmon fisheries along the steelheads’ migratory route to avoid interceptions, and measures for better watershed management.

4.6. Recovery activities

In supporting species at risk recovery, Government of Canada biologists across Canada led or supported dozens of activities, including research projects, education and awareness, habitat restoration or enhancement initiatives, monitoring, assessment, and more.

4.6.1. Agreements and collaboration

In 2019, ECCC helped advance recovery activities for a wide variety of terrestrial species at risk, including the six priority species, with conservation measures focused on research and monitoring, partnership development, conservation planning and implementation of conservation agreements under the Species at Risk Act.

On March 21, 2019, two draft section 11 conservation agreements for the Southern Mountain Caribou in British Columbia were published on the Species at Risk Public Registry for an extended consultation period that ended on May 31, 2019: a Bilateral Agreement between the Governments of Canada and British Columbia; and, a Partnership Agreement between the Government of Canada, the Government of British Columbia, the Saulteau First Nations, and the West Moberly First Nations.

Together, the agreements will advance the recovery of Southern Mountain Caribou in the province, a Priority Species whose numbers are in serious decline. This iconic species is vital to Indigenous peoples in British Columbia. The draft agreements represent a historic collaboration between all levels of government, including Indigenous partners, to implement critical measures to support the species’ recovery.

The draft bilateral agreement establishes a framework for cooperation, and includes commitments to science and Indigenous knowledge, monitoring, and herd planning, for the recovery of Southern Mountain Caribou throughout the species’ distribution in the province. The draft partnership agreement focuses on three Central Group local population units of Southern Mountain Caribou within the Peace Region of British Columbia. It includes commitments to interim and long-term habitat protection and conservation (e.g., creation of protected areas), and to operational recovery activities (e.g., maternal penning) and habitat restoration.

To support the recovery of Boreal Caribou, conservation agreements were finalized with the Yukon Territory and the Na-Cho Nyäk Dun First Nation and the Gwich’in Tribal Council, the Northwest Territories, Cold Lake First Nations, Saskatchewan, Quebec, and  Labrador, bringing the total number of conservation agreements in 2019 for Boreal Caribou to six. Negotiations were advanced for conservation agreements with Alberta, and Manitoba, as well as with two other First Nations. These agreements aim to support the conservation of the species and the protection of its critical habitat through concrete measures, including commitments to range-level planning, habitat protection, habitat and population management, and monitoring.

In addition, the proposed Amended Recovery Strategy for the Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou), Boreal population, in Canada in 2019, was released for public consultation on June 28, 2019. The Strategy identifies critical habitat in northern Saskatchewan’s Boreal Shield range (SK1), and updates population and habitat condition information for all ranges across the country.

In 2019, Parks Canada implemented recovery activities in and around the lands and waters it administers, including research, restoration activities, and public outreach and education. As part of the work under the Nature Legacy for Canada Initiative, Parks Canada allocated approximately $2.5M in 2019-2020 to projects across the country that initiated more than 60 actions identified in SARA action plans. Parks Canada conducted several projects in partnership with non-governmental organizations, academic institutions, private citizens and Indigenous communities. Conservation and restoration projects are recovering, restoring and enhancing ecosystems and species at risk across Canada, such as:

Eco-passages at Bruce Peninsula National Park

Photo of an eco-passage

From 2016-2019, eight eco-passages (also known as wildlife tunnels) were installed at Bruce Peninsula National Park as part of the On the Road to Recovery Conservation and Restoration (CoRe) program. These eco-passages have been installed at road mortality “hotspots” – areas where at-risk reptiles and amphibians have been frequently hit by vehicles in the past. The installation of eco-fencing (wildlife exclusion fencing) has helped direct wildlife to use the passages with the help of dedicated volunteers and local school groups.

Parks Canada Resource Conservation staff are able to monitor the success of the eco-passages using trail cameras. In 2019, over 910 individuals were documented travelling through the eco-passages. 134 of the 910 “eco-passengers” were species at risk (SAR), including the Massasauga Rattlesnake, Midland Painted Turtle, Common Snapping Turtle, and Eastern Ribbonsnake.

In the coming years, Parks Canada will be working with the Saugeen Ojibway Nation, the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, and the local municipality of Northern Bruce Peninsula to expand SAR conservation efforts within the park and surrounding area. This will include four new eco-passages and eco-fencing along Highway 6 - an 80 km/h highway that runs directly through the center of the Bruce Peninsula, and consequently fragments habitat for reptiles, amphibians and other wildlife. Building off the On the Road to Recovery program success, a new Conservation and Restoration program will focus on sharing lessons learned, best practices, and expand SAR recovery across a broad landscape level in southern Ontario.

In 2019, DFO helped advance recovery activities for a wide variety of aquatic species at risk, including finfish, shellfish and marine mammals. Collaboration with other federal departments, experts outside government and others was a key element of success.

For example, DFO’s Marine Mammal Response Program implemented a range of new marine mammal response tools and continued to build relationships to improve response: research, strategic regulatory sign placement to inform the public about marine mammal conservation measures, partnering with provincial wildlife conservation staff to share knowledge and build relationships in support of protecting species.

Program officials and external partner organizations carried out 399 responses nationally for species at risk including:

The information collected during these response activities helps DFO monitor and evaluate the threat level from these forms of harm, and find ways to reduce entanglements and vessel collisions. Outreach activities help to educate the public on ways to help protect and avoid harming marine animals.

New partnership and new hope for Atlantic Whitefish Recovery

photo Atlantic Whitefish
Atlantic Whitefish
Photo: Bob Semple

In 1984, the Atlantic Whitefish became the first fish species in Canada to be assessed as  ‘endangered’ by COSEWIC. It was listed under SARA when the Act came into force in 2003. The Atlantic Whitefish is a Canadian endemic species known historically to occur in only two watersheds in the world, both in southwestern Nova Scotia: the Tusket River and Petite Rivière. Extirpated from the Tusket in the early 1980s, the Atlantic Whitefish is currently only found in three small interconnected lakes in the upper Petite Rivière watershed.

Atlantic Whitefish are thought to be the sole living representative of the early form of Whitefishes and a basal lineage of the widespread northern hemisphere genus Coregonus. It represents a unique component of local, national, and global biodiversity and therefore is recognized to be of considerable evolutionary significance.

Despite ongoing efforts by DFO and the multi-partner Recovery Team since 1999, the species status has not improved and is at risk of extinction. Declines in abundance, range restriction, and identified threats (e.g., dams to fish passage and presence of invasive predatory Smallmouth Bass) have continued and a significant new threat has emerged in the presence of invasive predatory Chain Pickerel.

Since the discovery of Chain Pickerel in the Petite Lakes in 2013, the focus of DFO, the Province of Nova Scotia, and partner organization Coastal Action has been on mitigating the spread of Chain Pickerel to reduce its impact on Atlantic Whitefish. Although these efforts are vital, mitigating the impact of invasives alone will not lead to the recovery of Atlantic Whitefish.

Range expansion is the most viable option to prevent the species’ extinction and facilitate its recovery. Dalhousie University, home to a world class aquatic research facility, expressed an interest in holding and raising larval Atlantic Whitefish to safeguard against the species’ extinction and to eventually captive-breed mature individuals. Dalhousie’s Aquatron facility currently holds approximately 110 Atlantic Whitefish. In anticipation of successful captive breeding planned for fall 2020, Coastal Action, through a Canada Nature Fund for Aquatic Species at Risk funded project, is building a streamside incubation trailer that it will operate to acclimatize young Atlantic Whitefish to a potential new waterbody; and, with support from the Habitat Stewardship Program, Coastal Action is collecting various physical, biological, and chemical water quality parameters on several lakes to help determine their suitability as Atlantic Whitefish habitat.

These individual and collective efforts provide an exciting new window of hope and promise for the future of Atlantic Whitefish survival and recovery.

A further example of efforts to advance recovery, is the expansion of measures for Southern Resident killer whales recovery. In May 2019, DFO, in collaboration with Transport Canada, signed a SARA Section 11 Conservation Agreement to Support the Recovery of the Southern Resident Killer Whale, with the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority (VFPA) and six other member organizations (collectively the “Parties”) that are part of the VFPA’s Enhancing Cetacean Habitat and Observation (ECHO) Program. There are nine signatories to the Agreement: the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, the Chamber of Shipping of British Columbia, the Shipping Federation of Canada, Cruise Lines International Association, the Council of Marine Carriers, the International Ship Owners Alliance of Canada, the Pacific Pilotage Authority, Transport Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. This five-year agreement will help support recovery of the Southern Resident Killer Whale (SRKW) by formalizing 1) the participation of the Parties in the ECHO Program, through which the Parties will work collaboratively on voluntary measures to reduce the contribution of Large Commercial Vessels (LCVs) to threats to SRKW;and 2) the role of the ECHO Program in advancing research and educational outreach to better understand how LCVs contribute to threats to SRKW and their critical habitat.

Collaborative efforts in rescuing a North Atlantic Right Whale

Photo, north atlantic right whale
North Atlantic Right Whale
Photo: Nick Hawkins

On July 4, 2019, a North Atlantic Right Whale was discovered entangled in fishing gear by Transport Canada in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence. The entanglement involved rope around the body, head, and through the mouth. Despite the severe entanglement, the whale was highly mobile. After continuous monitoring of the area, the whale was spotted again on July 19 by both the United States based aerial surveillance team from the Northeastern Fisheries Science Center and by Fisheries and Oceans Canada. A team from the New England Aquarium was in the area and succeeded in attaching a telemetry buoy to the whale to track its movements for disentanglement.

The whale did not remain in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence for long and began moving towards the Cabot Strait. Members of the Newfoundland and Labrador-based Whale Release and Strandings group (Tangly Whales) were deployed to Sydney in Cape Breton to partner with DFO fishery officers in preparation to intercept and begin their disentanglement of the whale once it arrived in the area.

A plane from the DFO Fisheries Aerial Surveillance and Enforcement program provided support from the air, and the Canadian Coast Guard provided support in the form of a safety vessel in the area. After multiple attempts to disentangle the whale over the following days, Tangly Whales was able to confirm that one line of rope was cut, however the whale remained entangled and continued to be highly mobile. It moved 50 nautical miles offshore of Nova Scotia which was too far to safely perform further disentanglement activities.

The satellite tag provided continuous monitoring of the whale’s location as it moved along the coast of Nova Scotia and into US waters, where it headed inland towards Cape Cod, Massachusetts. On August 2, a team from the Marine Animal Entanglement Response team (MAER) from the Center for Coastal Studies (CCS) was able to intercept the whale and were successful in disentangling the whale to the point where the remainder of the entanglement would be shed as the whale resumed feeding in a normal manner.

Without a collaborative approach from both countries, all departments, teams and organization, this positive result would not have been possible.

4.6.2. Habitat Stewardship Program

The Government of Canada’s Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP) for Species at Risk was established in 2000 as part of the National Strategy for the Protection of Species at Risk. The overall goals of the HSP are to contribute to the recovery of endangered, threatened and other species at risk, and to prevent other species from becoming a conservation concern, by involving Canadians from all walks of life in conservation actions to benefit wildlife.

The most complete data available for the HSP at the end of 2019 is for the 2018-2019 fiscal year. ECCC administers HSP funds that support terrestrial stewardship projects while DFO is responsible for administering aquatic stewardship projects, both on a regional basis. Regional implementation boards include representatives from federal, provincial and territorial governments, and various stakeholders. These boards provide advice on priorities and project selection for their regions.

Funding under HSP in 2018-2019 was separated into two distinct streams:

  1. HSP species at risk stream
  2. HSP prevention stream

Results under both streams are focused on the following:

The HSP Species at Risk Stream focuses on projects addressing the recovery of species at risk listed on Schedule 1 of SARA.

During the 2018-2019 fiscal year, 45 new projects and 105 previously approved multi-year projects involving 137 unique funding recipients contributed to the recovery efforts of over 170 unique SARA-listed species across Canada. A  total of $9 million in HSP SAR Stream funding was awarded to these projects, and an additional $25 million (cash and in-kind) was leveraged from partners, for a total investment of $34 million.

These contributions provided support to stewardship efforts across Canada that resulted in the securement and protection of over 193,500 hectares (ha) of land, including 11,900 ha through legally binding means, such as acquisition or conservation easements. Non-legally binding protection was put in place through the use of written conservation agreements with landowners, which accounts for over 181,500 ha, including more than 149,300 ha through renewed conservation agreements and more than 32,200 ha through new conservation agreements. The program also supported the improvement or restoration of more than 33,400 ha of land and 82 km of shoreline.

The HSP Prevention Stream focuses on projects addressing species not listed on Schedule 1 of SARA, to prevent them from becoming a conservation concern.

During the 2018-2019 fiscal year the HSP Prevention Stream funded 26 new projects and 29 previously approved multi-year projects, which support work to prevent species from becoming a conservation concern. A total of over $993,300 in HSP Prevention Stream funding was awarded to these projects, and an additional $2.2 million (cash and in-kind) was leveraged from partners, for a total investment of over $3 million.

These contributions provided support to stewardship efforts across Canada that resulted in the securement and protection of more than 1400 ha of land, including more than 500 ha through legally binding means, such as acquisition or conservation easements. Non-legally binding protection was put in place through the use of written conservation agreements with landowners, which accounts for more than 900 ha. The program also supported the improvement or restoration of more than 2600 ha of land and 4 kilometres of shoreline.

Awareness and Action Measures to Protect Marine Mammals in the Salish Sea: A Multi-Media, Public Outreach and Education Program

With support from the Government of Canada’s Habitat Stewardship Program for Aquatic Species at Risk, the Saturna Island Marine Research and Education Society (SIMRES) led a two-year outreach project that raised public awareness of the current major threats hindering the recovery of the endangered Southern Resident Killer Whale (SRKW).

Through data collection, data analysis, and production of data-supported education and outreach materials, SIMRES delivered an interactive Outreach and Education program focused on Awareness and Action Measures, hosted at public venues, in tandem with real-time online streaming platforms. The flagship event: “SEA TALKS LIVE: The Top 5 Things that We Can All Do to Help Save SRKW” was delivered in collaboration with SIMRES’s partners.

The SRKW population in British Columbia is recognized as being endangered under the Species at Risk Act due to their small population size, low reproductive rate and the existence of a variety of human-related stressors. Principal among these threats are the reduction in the availability and quality of their primary prey species Chinook Salmon, environmental contamination, and both physical and acoustic disturbances.

Building a multi-media, public outreach and education program increased public awareness of the threats facing SRKW and the action measures that the public can take to help reduce their impact and ensure the survival of this population.

DFO has administrative responsibility for aquatic HSP projects to improve support for proponents and partners to protect and recover aquatic species at risk and has consolidated the Species at Risk and Prevention streams for aquatic projects into a single funding stream. The Habitat Stewardship Program for Aquatic Species at Risk provides funding for projects submitted by Canadians that contribute directly to the recovery of endangered, threatened, and other aquatic species at risk and encourages engagement of Canadians from all walks of life in conservation actions to benefit wildlife. To guide the effective use of limited resources, national and regional priorities inform the selection of proposed projects. Activities that respond to program priorities are reviewed regionally and recommended for funding in six regions: Pacific, Central & Arctic, Quebec, Gulf, Maritimes, and Newfoundland & Labrador.

The HSP for Aquatic Species at Risk is committed to supporting Canadians in their efforts to help protect and recover aquatic species at risk; it is intended to not only remove human threats to the habitats of aquatic species at risk but also to support their recovery and protect them in the future, so that the benefits of these efforts will be sustained for generations to come.

The Habitat Stewardship Program (HSP) for aquatic species invested nearly $4 million dollars in new and previously approved projects in 2018-2019. These contributions provided support to stewardship efforts across Canada that resulted in outreach activities that reached 159 503 people. Groups conducted 233 habitat/species surveys/inventories and completed 1332 monitoring studies.

Restoration of Headwater Streams for the Protection and Recovery of the Redside Dace

The Habitat Stewardship Program for Aquatic Species at risk provided funding to the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority in Ontario for a 1-year project that supported and promoted the protection, recovery, and restoration of the critical habitat areas along the Saugeen River and its tributaries for the endangered Redside Dace.

They promoted the conservation and recovery of the Redside Dace through the planting of cover crops on the project location area farms to decrease nutrient loading to the habitat of the Redside Dace which develops through agricultural practices. Riparian vegetation was planted in order to decrease threats to the species. The threats that were mitigated by these plantings included: changes in stream structure including widening;  decreased pool depths resulting from flow alteration; and reduced sediment, nutrient and contaminant loading.

Overhanging vegetation is an important component of the species habitat as it provides a source of cover to protect it from aerial and terrestrial predators. By planting riparian vegetation, terrestrial insects also gained habitat resulting in becoming a food supply for the Redside Dace. By shading the waterway, riparian vegetation acted to maintain optimal cooler temperatures for the aquatic species. Tree planting further reduced nutrient loading and helped protect the water quality of the habitat area. A large section of the Main Saugeen River was cleaned of debris and waste to improve the ecosystem health within the project area. The restoration of eroded bank areas further promoted species recovery by offering increased protection from prey. Eroded banks increase the amount of silt that enters the waterway and consequently reduces water clarity. By decreasing the amount of erosion within the habitat, the Redside Dace will be able to see their prey and improve their chances of survival.

All of these activities undertaken by the Saugeen Valley Conservation Authority resulted in the promotion of conservation and recovery of the Redside Dace.

Photo of Redside Dace

Additional information on the program for ECCC is available on the Government of Canada’s Habitat Stewardship Program for species at risk website and for DFO, on the Government of Canada’s Habitat Stewardship Program for Aquatic Species at Risk Program website.

4.6.3. Aboriginal Fund for Species at Risk

The Aboriginal Fund for Species at Risk (AFSAR), established in 2004, supports the development of Indigenous capacity to participate actively in the implementation of SARA. The Act recognizes the important role that Indigenous Peoples play in wildlife conservation and the need to consider Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK) in the assessment of which species may be at risk, as well as in the development and implementation of protection and recovery measures. Additionally, AFSAR supports projects that will proactively prevent species, other than species at risk, from becoming a conservation concern.

ECCC administers AFSAR funds that support terrestrial stewardship projects while DFO is responsible for administering aquatic stewardship projects. Regional management teams include representatives from federal, provincial and territorial governments, Indigenous representatives, and various stakeholders. These teams provide advice on priorities and project selection for their regions.

The most complete data available for AFSAR at the end of 2019 is for the 2018-2019 fiscal year. Funding under AFSAR in 2018-2019 was separated into two distinct streams for terrestrial projects administered by ECCC:

The AFSAR Species at Risk (SAR) Stream focuses on terrestrial projects addressing the recovery of terrestrial species at risk listed on Schedule 1 of SARA, targeting the following results in four main areas:

During the 2018-2019 fiscal year the AFSAR SAR Stream:

These contributions provided support to stewardship efforts across Canada that resulted in the protection of just over 32,200 ha of land which includes 583 ha through legally binding means, such as acquisition or conservation easements and just over 31,600 ha of land through non-legally binding means such as conservation agreements. The program also supported the improvement or restoration of more than 81,800 ha of land and 4 kilometres of shoreline.

The AFSAR Prevention Stream focuses on projects addressing terrestrial species, not listed on Schedule 1 of SARA, to prevent them from becoming a conservation concern. It targets the same results as the Species at Risk Stream.

During the 2018-2019 fiscal year: the AFSAR Prevention Stream provided over $422,000 to eight new, and four previously approved multi-year projects to prevent species other than listed species at risk from becoming a conservation concern; the AFSAR Prevention Stream leveraged additional funds that exceeded $1.1 million (cash and in kind).

These projects involved 13 Indigenous organizations and communities as recipients. These contributions also supported the improvement or restoration of more than 262 ha of land and 1 km of shoreline.

Beginning in 2019, DFO consolidated the SAR and Prevention streams for aquatic projects into a single funding stream targeting species ranging from COSEWIC-assessed as a minimum eligibility to those listed on Schedule 1 of SARA. The DFO consolidated AFSAR funding stream targets the same key results as the terrestrial species at risk stream administered by ECCC.

During the 2018-2019 fiscal year the DFO-administered AFSAR Aquatic Stream:

Additional information on the program is available on the Government of Canada’s Aboriginal Fund for Species at Risk website and for DFO, on the Government of Canada’s Aboriginal Fund for Species at Risk website.

4.6.4. Interdepartmental Recovery Fund

Established in 2002, the Interdepartmental Recovery Fund (IRF), administered by ECCC, supports species at risk projects undertaken by federal government departments, agencies and Crown corporations (other than ECCC, DFO, and Parks Canada). Funded projects predominantly occur on lands owned or administered by federal organizations and directly relate to the implementation of activities identified in recovery strategies or action plans, or surveys of species at risk.

Between its inception in 2002 and the end of March 2019, the IRF has invested over $23.7 million in more than 730 projects which supported recovery efforts annually, on average, for 50 species at risk. In the 2018-2019 fiscal year, the IRF supported 14 projects in five federal departments and one Crown corporation. Collectively, $587,000 in program funding and $666,583 in leveraged funds (cash and in-kind) from project leads and other partners, supported recovery efforts for 54 SARA-listed species. In 2018-2019, 75% of program funds supported recovery actions, and 22% supported surveys, and 3% supported program planning and development.

4.7 Outreach and education

In 2019, ECCC produced and delivered information in various forms to educate Canadians about the role they can play in protecting species at risk and their habitats. There was also a strong focus on engaging other government departments to provide training on SARA for employees who work directly with the Act.

ECCC continues to educate Canadians about species at risk through its long-standing partnership with the Canadian Wildlife Federation in delivering the Hinterland Who’s Who wildlife education program, and by developing and publishing species profiles on the Species at Risk Public Registry.

Parks Canada continues to promote species at risk protection through the Integrated Compliance and Law Enforcement Planning Process. The process maintains its focus on proactive communication with visitors to highlight the connection between their actions and the effect they can have on the protection and recovery of species at risk and their habitat.

Public engagement activities related to species at risk occur in national parks, national historic sites and national marine conservation areas across the country. These activities include interpretative programs, field trips, social media campaigns, special events and volunteer activities, including participation in restoration and monitoring projects (i.e., citizen science). Moreover, the Protecting Wildlife merchandise collection was launched in 2018 to raise awareness for species at risk in Canada. Annually since 2017, the National Merchandise Program has been reinvesting proceeds from the online sale of official merchandise to support species at risk and ecosystem conservation. To date, proceeds have helped multiple projects, including turtles in Point Pelee National Park, Kokanee Salmon in Kluane National Park Reserve, and Greater Sage-Grouse in Grasslands National Park.

In addition, Parks Canada has a number of outreach programs that focus on reaching youth, families and new Canadians in urban areas in order to increase awareness, understanding, and foster support for species at risk protection and recovery. In 2019, this included outreach programs at special events and festivals, and at several partner venues (e.g., zoos and aquariums) in large cities such as Toronto, Montréal, Vancouver, Winnipeg, Edmonton, Calgary, Halifax and Ottawa. Information about species at risk was also shared through the Government of Canada’s PCA website, social media, traditional media and organizations that reach out to the public with various programs, articles and websites.

DFO’s outreach and education efforts ranged from school visits to information booths at important gatherings, participation at trade shows, workshops and community meetings, promotion of awareness, and species at risk identification and disentanglement training, production of information materials and static displays in DFO offices. Highlights of these activities included:

Logo
poster, Ontario's Freshwater Mussels
Long description

A poster created by the Fisheries and Oceans Canada shows 42 images of Ontario’s Freshwater Mussels. Another 16 images show mussel species that are sexually dimorphic.

4.8. CESI species at risk indicators

For many wildlife species at risk, population objectives are set out in a recovery strategy or management plan and are periodically reassessed. By looking at population trends and changes in the status category of at risk species, it can provide a preliminary assessment of whether recovery efforts are working, recognizing that recovery may take many years. The following summary is taken from the Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators (CESI) program and current results are available on the Environmental indicators website.

Species at risk population trends indicator

The Species at risk population trends indicator shows whether population and distribution trends of species at risk are consistent with the objectives in final recovery strategies or management plans.

As of May 2019, final recovery strategies were published for 329 extirpated, endangered or threatened species and management plans were published for 109 species of special concern. Of those 438 species, 186 species with population and distribution objectives were reassessed since their recovery strategy or management plan was finalized, with 55 that did not contain enough information to determine population and distribution trends. Of the 131 species for which trends could be determined: 56 species (41%) show progress towards their population and distribution objectives, 60 species (47%) do not show progress and 15 species (12%) show mixed evidence, meaning that some information suggests improving trends, but that there is also some evidence of decline.

In 2019, four animal species and one plant species were added to the indicator. Of the four animal species added, three showed trends consistent with their recovery or management objective and one did not show a trend consistent with their objective. The one plant species added did not show a trend consistent with its recovery or management objective.

Figure 4: Are population and distribution trends of species at risk consistent with objectives? Canada, May 2019

graph, long description below

Note: There are also 55 species for which recovery or management objectives and reassessments exist, but insufficient evidence is available in the reassessment to assess trends. Information on these species can be found in the detailed data table. Categories account for the amount of time that has been available for recovery. "Mixed evidence" means that some information suggests improving trends, but that there is also some evidence of decline.

Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Parks Canada, and the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada Secretariat (2019). As reported in Environment and Climate Change Canada (2019) Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators.

Long description for figure 4

Are population and distribution trends of species at risk consistent with objectives? Canada, May 2019

Number of species

  • Yes: 55
  • Mixed evidence: 15
  • No: 60

Recovery of species is affected by many factors, including life span, reproductive cycle, and the state of their habitat. It can also be affected by threats such as habitat loss and pollution. In addition, recovery of rare species can be difficult to detect, particularly if the species is hard to find and identify. It takes time for a species' response to recovery management actions to become apparent. Indicator results should not be interpreted as a measure of success in recovering or maintaining species until sufficient time has passed to allow species to respond and to collect enough information for assessment.

4.8.2. Changes in the status of wildlife species at risk indicator

Identifying wildlife species at risk is the first step towards protecting them. Wildlife species previously designated as being at risk are reassessed, usually after 10 years, to determine if there is a change in status. The Changes in the status of wildlife species at risk indicator reports on changes in wildlife species designations for wildlife species assessed by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC).

As of May 2019, of the 488 wildlife species reassessed and for which sufficient data are available to determine if there has been a change in status:

Of the six wildlife species ranked as endangered in the previous assessment, that were recently reassessed (November 2018 and May 2019), the majority (4 wildlife species or 67%) remained in the endangered status category and the remaining two wildlife species changed to a lower risk category and were no longer categorized as endangered. In addition, three wildlife species that were from a lower-risk category in the previous assessment were designated endangered in the reassessment.

Figure 5: Changes in status of wildlife species at risk from Canada, May 2019

Graph, long description below
Note: In this analysis, wildlife species refers to a species, subspecies or a genetically or geographically distinct population. Wildlife species disappearance may refer to extinction or extirpation (an extirpated species no longer occurs in the wild in Canada). Lower risk consists of species reassessed as no longer at risk as well as species in a lower risk category compared to the previous assessment.

Source: Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, May 2019. As reported in Environment and Climate Change Canada (2019) Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators: Changes in the status of wildlife species at risk.
Long description for Figure 5

Changes in status of wildlife species at risk from Canada, May 2019

Number of species

  • 315 (65%) show no change in status
  • 90 (18%) are in a lower risk category
  • 83 (17%) are in a higher risk category

Page details

2021-05-18