2019-2020 Compliance Monitoring Project: Good manufacturing practices and testing of veterinary products for food-producing animals

Health Canada actively monitors the compliance of regulated parties and health products in Canada.

We did a proactive review to verify if veterinary products for food-producing animals and their suppliers comply with Health Canada’s regulations. Learn about how we conducted our review, what we found and what actions we took.

On this page

Why this review was done

Health Canada’s Veterinary Health Product Notification Program replaced the Interim Notification Pilot Program for Low-Risk Veterinary Health Products (LRVHPs) in November 2017. Now, Health Canada must be notified of all veterinary health products (VHPs) manufactured, labelled/packaged, imported, distributed or wholesaled in Canada. These products must also comply with the Food and Drugs Act (FDA) and Food and Drug Regulations (FDR). VHP requirements include labelling, claims, permitted substances and ingredients, and post-market responsibilities. VHPs are drugs under the FDR. Companies who manufacture, package, label, import, distribute and/or store VHPs are required to follow the Part 3 - Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) in the Natural Health Products Regulations.

On December 1, 2018, medically important antimicrobials (MIAs) important to human medicine and once sold over-the-counter for veterinary use were put on the Prescription Drug List. This change is to strengthen veterinary oversight and promote the prudent use of MIAs in animals. The responsible use of MIAs is intended to preserve their effectiveness and minimize the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance. All MIAs in Canada must have a drug identification number (DIN) issued by Health Canada. They must also be sold by prescription only and comply with the FDA and the FDR.

Any company that:

We conducted this project to verify compliance with:

Our findings will give us insight in the industry’s compliance with these recent regulatory changes.

What we reviewed

We visited 9 companies in November and December 2019 to verify compliance with the above requirements. We made 6 visits focused on VHPs and 3 visits focused on MIAs, with visits in Alberta, Ontario and Quebec. At each visit, inspectors verified specific regulatory requirements (see Table 1).

For visits focusing on MIAs, inspectors also sampled 6 products, which were tested in Health Canada laboratories to verify their compliance to specific requirements. We wanted to know if the MIAs contained:

These visits were not regular GMP inspections and no compliance rating was assigned. Inspectors provided companies with a summary of their findings at the end of each visit.

All suppliers (wholesalers, distributors and importers) of VHPs and MIAs for food-producing animals were considered for site visits. When selecting the sites, we considered both small and large companies, so we would have a general overview of the industry across Canada.

Table 1: Examples of what we reviewed on site
Type of veterinary product Examples

VHP

  • Products comply with labelling requirements
  • Products are notified to Health Canada
  • Companies comply with specific GMP requirements

MIA

What we found and what enforcement actions we took

During our visits, we found areas where companies needed to improve their practices to comply with regulatory requirements. Compliance issues ranging in severity were found at most companies. Based on the severity of a risk identified, we took the most appropriate compliance and enforcement actions.

Health Canada results obtained through this review are specific to the lot tested. Of the 6 products tested:

For the product that did not comply, the company discontinued the product licence. With no remaining product expected on the market, no other actions were taken.

Our laboratories also reviewed each company’s documentation to identify any issues related to analytical methods, specifications, data validation and certificate of analysis. We found that 5 out of 6 products had some issues with product documentation. We informed the companies of their issue(s) and followed up with them. We continue to work with the companies to address these issues.

During our visits, we considered the nature and extent of all issues found. We took the necessary actions to protect the health and safety of people in Canada based on our compliance and enforcement policy (POL-0001). This included a request to stop the sale of 2 products, which was implemented by the company.

Companies are responsible for:

Details on the issues identified and actions taken for each company visited (Table 2) and product tested (Table 3) are listed below.

Table 2: Site visit findings and enforcement actions
Establishment names Focus Provinces Issues identified on site Actions

Alberta Veterinary Laboratories Ltd

MIA

AB

  • No findings

Not applicable

Bio Agri Mix LP

MIA

ON

  • Labelling requirements
  • DEL requirements

We informed the company of the issues identified. We reviewed their response and found it to be adequate. No other action was deemed necessary at the time.

Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd

VHP

ON

  • Labelling requirements

We informed the company of the issues identified. We reviewed their response and found it to be adequate. No other action was deemed necessary at the time.

Kane Veterinary Supplies

VHP

AB

  • Labelling requirements
  • GMP requirements

We informed the company of the issues identified. We reviewed their response and found it to be adequate. No other action was deemed necessary at the time.

Mike Weber/EastGen Inc.

VHP

ON

  • Labelling requirements
  • GMP requirements

We informed the company of the issues identified. We reviewed their response and found it to be adequate. No other action was deemed necessary at the time.

Partnar Animal Health Inc.

VHP

ON

  • Labelling requirements
  • GMP requirements

Upon our request, the company stopped selling 2 products that listed ingredients contrary to their notification and/or to the permitted substances list. We found the company’s response to be adequate. No other actions were deemed necessary at the time.

Probiotech International Inc.

VHP

QC

  • Labelling requirements
  • GMP requirements

We informed the company of the issues identified. We reviewed their response and found it to be adequate. No other action was deemed necessary at the time.

Vetoquinol N A Inc

MIA

QC

  • No findings

Not applicable

Western Drug Distribution Centre (WDDC)

VHP

AB

  • Labelling requirements

We informed the company of the issues identified. We reviewed the product licence notifier’s responses and found them to be adequate. No other action was deemed necessary at the time.

Table 3: Results of products tested and enforcement actions
Product name DIN and Lot number Where it was sampled [product licence holder if different from where it was sampled] Testing results Actions
Cocci Scour Bolus
product image
DIN 02243017
Lot # 881010
Alberta Veterinary Laboratories Ltd (AB)
[Can-Vet Animal Health Supplies Ltd. (ON)]
An impurity was detected in the product. We informed the company of the issues identified. The company discontinued the product licence. With no remaining product expected on the market, no other actions were deemed necessary at the time.
Neo-Tetra Med
product image
DIN 01976338
Lot # 192071023
Bio Agri Mix LP (ON) The testing results met the specific requirements of the tests performed. No action taken
Onycin 1000
product image
DIN 00530646
Lot # 501797
Vetoquinol N A Inc. (QC) The testing results met the specific requirements of the tests performed. No action taken
Penicillin G Potassium USP Soluble Powder
product image
DIN 02139219
Lot # 192088021
Bio Agri Mix LP (ON) The testing results met the specific requirements of the tests performed. No action taken
Pot-pen
product image
DIN 02379406
Lot # 503024
Vetoquinol N A Inc. (QC) The testing results met the specific requirements of the tests performed. No action taken
Sulfamethazine
product image
DIN 02391368
Lot # 19SM020101
Alberta Veterinary Laboratories Ltd (AB) The testing results met the specific requirements of the tests performed. No action taken

What we will do with the results

This compliance monitoring project allowed us to collect information on how veterinary products for food-producing animals and their suppliers comply with Health Canada’s regulations. Although we visited and tested a small number of companies and products, we use what we find to provide better guidance to the industry on how to meet regulatory requirements.

The results also tell us where we can improve our overall oversight of VHPs and MIAs. This helps to improve the quality and safety of veterinary products in Canada. Going forward, we will continue to inform people of Canada on our proactive monitoring activities.

For more information

Page details

Date modified: