Francophone Community Immigration Pilot (FCIP): Examination before granting permanent residence

This section contains policy, procedures and guidance used by IRCC staff. It is posted on the department’s website as a courtesy to stakeholders.

Approving the application

Before issuing a confirmation of permanent residence (COPR), please verify that the applicant’s recommendation status is set as issued in the monthly community recommendation spreadsheet for the Francophone Community Immigration Pilot (FCIP).

As the principal applicants are currently in Canada, they may be landed by confirming their permanent residence according to the virtual landing instructions, as can any in-Canada accompanying dependent family members.

If any accompanying dependent family members live outside of Canada, send the ready for visa (RFV) letter, COPR and permanent resident visa (PRV) (if applicable) to the applicant’s address outside of Canada.

Approved applicants must present their COPR and PRV counterfoil (if applicable) to an officer at a Canadian port of entry [subsection R71.1(1)].

Accompanying family members of FCIP applicants may only become permanent residents at the same time as the principal applicant (PA) becomes a permanent resident, or afterward. In other words, family members of PAs cannot become permanent residents before the PA.

Examination at the port of entry (POE)

A permanent resident visa holder who is part of the FCIP and is seeking permanent resident status at a port of entry (POE) must establish that they still intend to reside in the community that recommended them.

Individuals who indicate that they intend to proceed to and reside in the designated community that recommended them, and who meet the other requirements of the legislation, should be processed for permanent resident status.

Individuals who indicate that they never intended or no longer intend to reside in the designated community that recommended them may be denied permanent resident status at the POE and may have a report under subsection 44(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IPRA) written about them.

In the case of individuals who indicate at the POE that they no longer intend to reside in the designated community that recommended them, the subsection A44(1) report may be written for non-compliance with section 9 of the Ministerial Instructions with Respect to the Francophone Community Immigration Class.

An additional allegation of misrepresentation, pursuant to paragraph A40(1)(a) and per subsection 2(1) of the Ministerial Instructions, may be included in the A44(1) report for individuals who indicate that they never intended to reside in the designated community that recommended them, if supported by the information obtained through examination at the POE.

A border services officer may also do the following if they are not satisfied that an individual intends to reside in the designated community that recommended them:

Note: If the applicant states that a representative advised them that residence in the designated community that recommended them is not a requirement of the FCIP, the border services officer should send an email to IRCC NHQ  and record a note in the Global Case Management System (GCMS) with information concerning the representative.

Additional information

Under the FCIP, there is no requirement for IRCC to consult with the designated community to refuse an application. Also, if a border services officer sends a client’s file for further examination to an IRCC inland office for final review, the IRCC inland office is not required to contact the designated community to render a final determination.

Page details

2026-01-12