1.0 Relevance |
1.1 Is there a continued need for a nationally standardized data collection strategy on hate-motivated crime? |
1.1.1 Prevalence of hate-motivated crime in Canada over time. |
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|
1.1.2 Perceptions of program stakeholders with respect to continued information needs. |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
1.1.3 Number of report downloads. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
1.2 Does the initiative continue to be consistent with departmental and government-wide priorities? |
1.2.1 Degree of alignment with departmental strategic outcomes/priorities (Multiculturalism/CIC). |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
1.2.2 Degree of alignment with Government of Canada priorities. |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
1.3 Is the program consistent with federal roles and responsibilities? |
1.3.1 Alignment with legislative and federal obligations. |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
2.0 Performance |
2.1 Were federal partners and stakeholders successfully engaged in the development and implementation of CAPAR? |
2.1.1 Perception of police services and stakeholders with respect to the utility and necessity of hate crime data collection. |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
2.1.2 Number of training sessions and presentations provided. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
2.2 Do police services have the training and tools necessary to identify and collect standardized hate-motivated crime data? |
2.2.1 Extent of training provided to police services. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
2.2.2 Extent of training tools, training materials, and on-site assistance available to police services. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
2.2.3 Police services’ perceptions regarding training and tools. |
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
2.3 Is Statistics Canada collecting high-quality, nationally standardized hate-motivated crime data? |
2.3.1 Proportion of Canadian police services reporting on hate-motivated crime data. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
2.3.2 Nature and extent of data quality verification. |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
2.3.3 Reasons why police services are not reporting hate-motivated crime data. |
|
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
2.4 To what extent is nationally standardized hate-motivated crime data made available? |
2.4.1 Type and extent of information dissemination (conferences, statistical tables and analytical reports, website, etc.). |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
x |
2.4.2 Stakeholder perceptions of data availability. |
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
2.5 Do stakeholders have an understanding of the nature and extent of hate-motivated crime provided by Statistics Canada? |
2.5.1 Type and extent of information dissemination (conferences, pdf downloads from website, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
2.5.2 Stakeholder perceptions. |
|
|
x |
x |
|
x |
|
2.6 Have stakeholders applied their knowledge of hate-motivated crime to improve programs, policies and services? |
2.6.1 Number and examples of changes to programs/policies/ services reported by stakeholders. |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
3.0 Alternatives |
3.1 Is Statistics Canada the most suitable delivery mechanism for the data strategy? |
3.1.1 Evidence of alternatives for collection of hate-motivated crime in Canada. |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
3.1.2 Evidence that Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics is meeting reporting and delivery requirements. |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
3.1.3 Cost of current approach. |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
3.1.4 Perception of stakeholders regarding alternative approaches, including cost implications (implementation of strategy by RCMP, police services, provinces). |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|