Military Grievances External Review Committee 2024-25 Departmental plan
Erratum
The explanation to table 5, located under Table 5: Budgetary planning summary for core responsibilities and internal services (dollars) has been corrected so that all amounts listed in the explanatory note are in thousands and not millions.
On this page
- From the Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer
- Plans to deliver on core responsibilities and internal services
- Planned spending and human resources
- Corporate information
- Supplementary information tables
- Federal tax expenditures
- Definitions
From the Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer
I am pleased to present the 2024-25 Departmental Plan of the Military Grievances External Review Committee (Committee).
Much like New Year’s resolutions, the Departmental Plan is a healthy, hopeful exercise of assessing oneself, identifying new milestones and committing to attaining those objectives before end of the fiscal year. All the while, the mandate of the organization remains central. As in 2023-24, the Committee will continue to forge ahead, working within its three-pillar framework of the people, the work and the workspace, and the Committee’s reach.
An organization is only as good as its diverse group of people. With significant hiring having already taken place and the expectation that a new Chairperson and new full-time Vice-Chairperson will be in place in shortly, training will be a significant endeavour this fiscal year. Retention remains just as important, especially for a micro-organization. To that end, senior management is committed to offering professional development opportunities and to ensuring the health and well-being of their people. This demands a definitive engagement plan that utilizes information sharing, events, consultation and much more.
The Clerk of the Privy Council’s Call to Action on Anti-Racism, Equity, and Inclusion in the Federal Public Service asks Government of Canada organizations to do better. The Committee will continue to respond by developing concrete actions that will address accessibility and potential biases, and that will both promote and uphold inclusion.
Effectiveness and efficiency are two words said time and time again and with good reason. How we do our work and what we accomplish impacts greatly on our credibility. As such, the Committee will look to reviewing the template and writing principles it uses in drafting its Findings and Recommendations (F&R) reports to ensure clarity and ease of understanding. Also, it will continue to further optimize its in-house case management system. We will complete our migration to the cloud and continue optimizing both our physical environment and the use of digital tools to support innovation, collaboration and excellence.
This year, perhaps more than in recent years, the Committee is sensitive to what people understand about our independent and impartial role within the Canadian Armed Forces Grievance System (CAFGS) and to the value that we add to the CAFGS by providing expert analysis and enhancing its credibility. As such, our website content and layout will be updated on a regular basis. Equally important is ensuring our partners and collaborators, specifically the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), understand the mandate, raison d’etre, mission, and vision of the Committee. Getting back to targeted face-to-face outreach will be a priority.
Finally, the Committee will seize the opportunity to review its departmental indicators. The rhetorical question most often ruminating in our hallways is “Are we measuring the right things and how does that feed into continuous improvement?” There may be no better time to reflect on the response than with a new Chairperson at the helm.
So it seems that 2024-25 has the makings of a vigorous yet reflective year. Anything is possible with the dedicated team of Committee Members and employees that make up this organization. Our resolutions are clear, our path determined, and our spirit ready.
(original signed by)
Vihar Joshi, OMM, MSM, K.C., CD, LSM, CIC.C
Interim Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer
Plans to deliver on core responsibilities and internal services
Core responsibilities and internal services:
Independent review of military grievances
Description
The National Defence Act, Section 29.2 (1) and (2), requires the Military Grievances External Review Committee to review every grievance referred to it by the Final Authority (FA) and to provide Findings and Recommendations in writing to the FA and the officer or non-commissioned member who submitted the grievance.
Quality of life impacts
This core responsibility contributes to the “Good Governance” domain of the Quality of Life Framework for Canada, and more specifically, under the following Justice and human rights indicators: “Discrimination and unfair treatment” and “Access to fair and equal justice.” Indeed, the Committee concretely contributes by conducting an independent review of every grievance referred to it and by providing quality F&R reports to the FA and the CAF member who submitted the grievance.
Results and targets
The following tables show, for each departmental result related to the Independent reveiw of military grievances, the indicators, the results from the three most recently reported fiscal years, the targets and target dates approved in 2024–25.
Table 1: Indicators, results and targets for departmental result
Findings and Recommendations on all referred military grievances are provided in a timely manner
Indicator | 2020–21 result |
2021–22 result | 2022–23 result | Target | Date to achieve |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
% of written Findings and Recommendations that are issued within 4 months of receipt (service standard) | 16.26% | 21.71% | 5.56% | At least 75% of findings and recommendations issued within 4 months of receipt | March 31, 2025 |
Table 2: Indicators, results and targets for departmental result
The Committee provides Findings and Recommendations to the Final Authority (FA) that are clear, complete, and useful in the military grievances decision-making process.
Indicator | 2020–21 result |
2021–22 result | 2022–23 result | Target | Date to achieve |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Achievement of a rating by the Final Authority (FA) of at least 4 out of 5 on each of the following attributes related to Findings and Recommendations issued by the Committee: usefulness, clarity, and completeness | Usefulness: 4.94/5 Clarity: 5/5 Completeness: 5/5 |
Usefulness: 4.27/5 Clarity: 4.27/5 Completeness: 4.26/5 |
Usefulness: 4.15/5 Clarity: 4.15/5 Completeness: 4.15/5 |
A cumulative minimum average of 4 out of 5 for each attribute. | March 31, 2025 |
The financial, human resources and performance information for the Military Grievances External Review Committee's program inventory is available on GC InfoBase.
Plans to achieve results
The Operations Team's (Ops) ultimate function is to review grievances referred to it by the Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS) as expeditiously and informally as is possible. This is the Committee's core business.
The focus in 2023-24 was hiring additional grievance officers and team leaders, as well as supporting the launch of the appointments for a new Chairperson and full-time Vice-Chairperson. The Committee completed its significant hiring and expects to have new leadership at the helm in early 2024. The next fiscal year brings its new goads and challenges.
First, training new leaders and employees will be essential. The goal is to continue providing training in the last quarter of 2023-24 so that all the grievance teams will be operational in 2024-25. After all, the additional hiring, made possible by additional temporary funding, served one purpose: amplify the Committee’s ability to deal with its existing caseload and effectively manage the volume of incoming referrals. With the collaboration of the CAF, the Committee was able to secure additional funding from the Department of National Defence (DND) for the next three years. This funding will enable the Committee to increase its capacity to produce F&R reports and ultimately reduce its backlog of files. The aim is for the Committee to be positioned in 2024-25 to again review a high volume of grievance files thoroughly and comprehensively. Fortuitously, the Committee was able to attract people with CAF and grievance experience, which will ultimately stand in good stead as we launch into 2024-25.
Second, the Committee will work on enhancing the reader’s experience of our F&R reports and making improvements to our in-house case management system. Our F&R reports represent the Committee’s thorough analysis and evidence-based recommendations on each grievance referred to us. Implementing a shift to plain, inclusive language and exploring a structure that pinpoints the issues with greater clarity to guide the CDS in their decision-making and providing a better understanding of the issues for the grievors is the Committee fulfilling its mandate and responding to Government of Canada priorities. Meanwhile, the search function of our case management system is in need of optimization so that searching for information is simple. This involves adapting the tools to meet the needs of the grievance review teams.
Third, Ops will augment its outreach efforts. The last fiscal year brought to light the evident misconceptions or fragmented understanding of the Committee and what it does. Questions about our independence and impartiality, our internal grievance review process, and our role in the CAF grievance review process seem to have arisen. While we engage regularly with DND and the CAF as required, a more concerted effort to inform and secure a common understanding of our organization will be undertaken.
Finally, the intention is to re-assess our performance indicators included in our Departmental Results Framework and determine if we are measuring the right things. Any change to our performance indicators will also have an impact on how we assess performance and so this too will have to be examined more closely. It would seem the arrival of a new Chairperson may be the moment to have this fulsome discussion. The time might be ripe, perhaps, to address the questions that we at the Committee ask ourselves on a daily basis.
Key risks
Retaining newly hired employees is a challenge for a micro-organization like the Committee, given the time and resources a fulsome onboarding process requires. That initial engagement period, which includes orientation, training, furnishing of proper equipment and tools and internal networking, is often the link that not only ensures their success within the organization but cements their place within it.
Working on change and improvements to systems, products and organizational indicators occupies a significant amount of capacity in several employees. It takes more than one person away from their regular duties, so to speak. Add on the training required to bring the entire team up to speed on the improvements and, all of a sudden, the Committee may not be able to review as many grievances and issue as many F&R reports. Maintaining high productivity while implementing changes is crucial and so the Committee balance these two objectives with caution. Any potential impact could be countered by the fact that there is an additional grievance team on board and by harnessing the advantages subject-matter experts bring to the grievance review process.
Gender-based analysis plus
Building off those initiatives already implemented in the previous fiscal year, the Committee has several new Gender-based analysis plus (GBA Plus) initiatives planned for 2024-25. First, GBA Plus training will be mandated for all the new employees who join the Committee in or after 2023. This training has been included in the Committee’s mandatory training curriculum for several years now and the Committee will continue to maintain a completion rate above 75%. In addition, the Committee will develop a statement of intent to clearly articulate its commitment to GBA Plus, identify a GBA Plus Champion to lead various initiatives, and promote tools and resources that employees can apply to their work.
United Nations 2023 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the UN Sustainable Development Goals
The Committee fully supports the principles of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, and Canada’s 2030 Agenda National Strategy. Committed to doing what it can to advance the principles of sustainable development and greening government objectives, the Committee is nonetheless cognizant that it is a micro-organization and is limited in how it can contribute.
Activities will range from increasing awareness and mandating key training related to procurement and Indigenous cultural competency to greening our micro-organization’s office space and business practices/processes to awarding federal contracts to Indigenous peoples. The Committee is fully engaged and fully supports the environmental, social and economic dimensions of sustainable development. Every contribution, however small, makes a difference.
More information on the Military Grievances External Review Committee’s contributions to Canada’s Federal Implementation Plan on the 2030 Agenda and the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy can be found in our 2023-2027 Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy.
Program inventory
The independent review of military grievances is supported by the following program:
- Independent review of military grievances
Supporting information on planned expenditures, human resources, and results related to the Military Grievances External Review Committee's program inventory is available on GC Infobase.
Internal services
Description
Internal services are the services that are provided within a department so that it can meet its corporate obligations and deliver its programs. There are 10 categories of internal services:
- management and oversight services
- communications services
- legal services
- human resources management services
- financial management services
- information management services
- information technology services
- real property management services
- materiel management services
- acquisition management services
Plans to achieve results
In 2024-25, Internal Services will continue building on effectiveness, efficiencies and well-being by diving deeper into its three pillars: the people, the work and workspace, and the Committee’s reach. In order to advance past year achievements, the following activities will be the priority.
Recruitment, retention, accessibility and well-being
Recruiting based on need is standard practice, however, where and how you recruit has evolved over the last few years and the Committee will target functional communities and take advantage of established online spaces, such as LinkedIn, to discover new talent. Retaining talent is equally important. As such, learning opportunities and offering professional development, which is challenging for a micro-organization, to employees looking for growth or change will continue in the next fiscal year. The work to create a barrier-free workplace and services while identifying and removing potential biases will carry on. Lastly, the Committee will continue to invest in wellness. Ensuring that employees work in a healthy, respectful, and supportive environment is a must and all efforts to preserve and sustain the mental health and well-being of our staff is perhaps the most significant priority for senior management.
Effectiveness and security
First and foremost, as the result of a professional analysis, the Committee will implement an improved governance structure that clearly defines the organization's responsibilities and relationships to augment employee satisfaction. The Committee will continue its work on a safe, open-concept workplace that encourages knowledge sharing, innovation and creativity, as well as continue to modernize its library of work tools. This includes financial systems and processes, specifically workflow implementation for electronic authorization within the financial system. In the digital age and telework environment, security must be a priority. The Committee will have already tested the efficacy of its business continuity plan in 2023-24 and implement results and findings in 2024-25. The Committee will also complete its four-year plan of migrating to the cloud. The goal continues to be improving policies and procedures related to both physical and information security.
Engagement and outreach
The benefits of employee engagement can not be understated. The Committee is dedicated to further enriching its internal communications plan with an end goal of motivating and staying closely connected with its employees. This includes a revamped intranet as well as meaningful events, blogging, polling, and regular town halls. The external website will continue to be updated with new content while its information architecture will be revised to better respond to user’s needs. Even for a micro-organization, outreach is required. As such, efforts to improve stakeholder awareness and understanding of the Committee’s work will be pursued.
Related government priorities
Planning for contracts awarded to Indigenous businesses
In the spirit of economic reconciliation with Indigenous peoples, the Government of Canada established a mandatory minimum target of at least 5% of the value of federal contracts to be awarded to businesses owned and led by Indigenous peoples. As per the schedule prescribed by Indigenous Services Canada, the Committee is part of Phase 3, where it is required to meet the mandatory minimum target of 5% of its total contracts to Indigenous businesses annually by 2024-25.
The Committee will do its part in supporting the Indigenous community and has already adjusted its internal processes and procurement plan. A target of 5% has been set within the organization for fiscal year 2024-25.
Table 3: Planning for contracts awarded to Indigenous businesses
The following table shows how the department plans to achieve awarding at least 5% of the total value of contracts to Indigenous businesses annually.
5% reporting field | 2022–23 actual result |
2023–24 forecasted result | 2024–25 planned result |
---|---|---|---|
Total percentage of contracts with Indigenous businesses | 5.36% | n/a | 5% |
Planned spending and human resources
This section provides an overview of the Military Grievances External Review Committee’s planned spending and human resources for the next three fiscal years and compares planned spending for 2024–25 with actual spending from previous years.
Spending
Table 4: Actual spending summary for core responsibilities and internal services ($ dollars)
The following table shows information on spending for each of the Military Grievances External Review Committee’s core responsibilities and for its internal services for the previous three fiscal years. Amounts for the current fiscal year are forecasted based on spending to date.
Core responsibilities and internal services | 2021-22 actual expenditures | 2022-23 actual expenditures | 2023-24 forecast spending |
---|---|---|---|
Independent review of military grievances | $4,811,195 | $4,706,492 | $5,330,222 |
Subtotal | $4,811,195 | $4,706,492 | $5,330,222 |
Internal services | $2,213,866 | $2,382,708 | $2,284,381 |
Total | $7,025,061 | $7,089,200 | $7,614,603 |
Explanation of table 4
The forecasted spending for the 2023-24 fiscal year represents a substantial increase of $525.4 thousand when compared to the total expenditures for the previous year, 2022-23. This variance is primarily attributed to retroactive payments and in-year compensation adjustments required by various collective agreements and terms and conditions of employment. Additionally, the increase in authorities is partially explained by a transfer of $397.6 thousand received in Supplementary Estimates B from DND. This transfer is necessary to enable the Committee to increase its capacity to produce F&R reports.
Table 5: Budgetary planning summary for core responsibilities and internal services (dollars)
The following table shows information on spending for each of the Military Grievances External Review Committee’s core responsibilities and for its internal services for the upcoming three fiscal years.
Core responsibilities and internal services | 2024-25 budgetary spending (as indicated in Main Estimates) | 2024-25 planned spending | 2025-26 planned spending | 2026-27 planned spending |
---|---|---|---|---|
Independent review of military grievances | $5,772,916 | $5,772,916 | $5,797,908 | $5,670,692 |
Subtotal | $5,772,916 | $5,772,916 | $5,797,908 | $5,670,692 |
Internal services | $2,474,107 | $2,474,107 | $2,484,817 | $2,430,297 |
Total | $8,247,023 | $8,247,023 | $8,282,725 | $8,100,989 |
Explanation of table 5
Typically, we observe a decrease in planned spending due to the absence of operating budget carry-forwards in future years’ authorities. Nevertheless, the notable increases in authorities for the upcoming three fiscal years can be attributed to the multi-year funding transfer from DND, amounting to $849.4 thousand for 2024-25, $849.4 thousand for 2025-26, and $631.9 thousand for 2026-27.
Funding
Figure 1: Departmental spending 2021–22 to 2026–27
The following graph presents planned spending (voted and statutory expenditures) over time.
Text description of figure 1
2021-22 | 2022-23 | 2023-24 | 2024-25 | 2025-26 | 2026-27 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statutory | $742 | $768 | $655 | $769 | $773 | $746 |
Voted | $6,283 | $6,321 | $6,960 | $7,478 | $7,510 | $7,355 |
Total | $7,025 | $7,089 | $7,615 | $8,247 | $8,283 | $8,101 |
Explanation of figure 1
Expenditures for fiscal years 2021-22 and 2022-23 represent the actual spending incurred during those respective years, as reported in the Public Accounts.
The planned spending for fiscal year 2023-24 reflects the projected spending level for the entire fiscal year, while the planned spending for fiscal years 2024-25 to 2026-27 reflects funds already included in the Committee's reference levels. This also includes amounts to be authorized through the Estimates process, as presented in the Committee's Annual Reference Level Update.
Estimates by vote
Information on the Military Grievances External Review Committee’s organizational appropriations is available in the 2024–25 Main Estimates.
Future-oriented condensed statement of operations
The future-oriented condensed statement of operations provides an overview of the Military Grievances External Review Committee’s operations for 2023–24 to 2024–25.
The forecast and planned amounts in this statement of operations were prepared on an accrual basis. The forecast and planned amounts presented in other sections of the Departmental Plan were prepared on an expenditure basis. Amounts may therefore differ.
A more detailed future-oriented statement of operations and associated notes, including a reconciliation of the net cost of operations with the requested authorities, are available on the Committee’s website.
Table 6: Future-oriented condensed statement of operations for the year ending March 31, 2025 (dollars)
Financial information | 2023-2024 forecast results | 2024-2025 planned results | Difference (2024-2025 planned results minus 2023-2024 forecast results) |
---|---|---|---|
Total expenses | $8,352,000 | $8,775,000 | $423,000 |
Total revenues | $1,000 | $0 | ($1,000) |
Net cost of operations before government funding and transfers | $8,351,000 | $8,775,000 | $424,000 |
Explanation of table 6
The variance is primarily explained by the significant increase in planned salary expenditures for fiscal year 2024-25. This increase is attributed to the Committee receiving a funding transfer of $849.4 million from DND, compared to the $397.6 thousand received in the previous fiscal year 2023-24.
Additionally, the variance is influenced by an expected loss due to the disposal of leasehold improvements in 2023-24, resulting from the Committee vacating a portion of its leased space.
It is important to note that the 2024-25 planned results only include amounts specified in the Main Estimates and do not account for any surpluses. In contrast, the 2023-24 results do include a surplus over its maximum carry-forward.
Human resources
Table 7: Actual human resources for core responsibilities and internal services
The following table shows a summary of human resources, in full-time equivalents (FTEs), for the Military Grievances External Review Committee ’s core responsibilities and for its internal services for the previous three fiscal years. Human resources for the current fiscal year are forecasted based on year to date.
Core responsibilities and internal services | 2021-22 actual FTEs | 2022-23 actual FTEs | 2023-24 forecasted FTEs |
---|---|---|---|
Independent review of military grievances | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Subtotal | 34 | 33 | 33 |
Internal services | 13 | 15 | 14 |
Total | 47 | 48 | 47 |
Explanation of table 7
The forecasted total number of FTEs by the end of 2023-24 is 47, slightly below the planned 49 FTEs outlined in the 2023-24 Departmental Plan. While most vacant positions have been filled, the positions of the Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer, as well as the full-time Vice-President have been vacant for over a year and a half.
Table 8: Human resources planning summary for core responsibilities and internal services
The following table shows information on human resources, in FTEs, for each of the Military Grievances External Review Committee ’s core responsibilities and for its internal services planned for 2024–25 and future years.
Core responsibilities and internal services | 2024-25 planned full-time equivalients | 2025-26 planned full-time equivalents | 2026-27 planned full-time equivalents |
---|---|---|---|
Independent review of military grievances | 42 | 42 | 40 |
Subtotal | 42 | 42 | 40 |
Internal services | 14 | 14 | 14 |
Total | 56 | 56 | 54 |
Explanation of table 8
Starting in 2024-25, there is a notable increase in FTEs for the next three fiscal years. This expansion is aimed at enhancing the Committee's capacity to produce F&R reports.
Organizational profile
Appropriate minister:
The Honourable Bill Blair, MP
Institutional head:
Vihar Joshi, Interim Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer
Ministerial portfolio:
National Defence
Enabling instrument(s):
National Defence Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. N-5
Year of incorporation / commencement:
2000
Other:
About the Committee
Organizational contact information
Mailing address:
60 Queen St, 9th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 5Y7
Telephone:
(613) 996-8529
Fax:
(613) 996-6491
Email:
mgerc-ceegm@mgerc-ceegm.gc.ca
Website:
https://www.canada.ca/en/military-grievances-external-review.html
Supplementary information tables
The following supplementary information tables are available on the Military Grievances External Review Committee’s website:
Information on the Military Grievances External Review Committee’s departmental sustainable development strategy can be found on the Committee’s website.
Federal tax expenditures
The Military Grievances External Review Committee’s Departmental Plan does not include information on tax expenditures.
Tax expenditures are the responsibility of the Minister of Finance. The Department of Finance Canada publishes cost estimates and projections for government wide tax expenditures each year in the Report on Federal Tax Expenditures.
This report provides detailed information on tax expenditures, including objectives, historical background and references to related federal spending programs, as well as evaluations, research papers and gender-based analysis plus.
Definitions
List of terms
appropriation (crédit)
Any authority of Parliament to pay money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
budgetary expenditures (dépenses budgétaires)
Operating and capital expenditures; transfer payments to other levels of government, organizations or individuals; and payments to Crown corporations.
core responsibility (responsabilité essentielle)
An enduring function or role performed by a department. The intentions of the department with respect to a core responsibility are reflected in one or more related departmental results that the department seeks to contribute to or influence.
Departmental Plan (plan ministériel)
A document that sets out a department’s priorities, programs, expected results and associated resource requirements, covering a three‑year period beginning with the year indicated in the title of the report. Departmental Plans are tabled in Parliament each spring.
departmental result (résultat ministériel)
A change that a department seeks to influence. A departmental result is often outside departments’ immediate control, but it should be influenced by program-level outcomes.
departmental result indicator (indicateur de résultat ministériel)
A factor or variable that provides a valid and reliable means to measure or describe progress on a departmental result.
departmental results framework (cadre ministériel des résultats)
A framework that consists of the department’s core responsibilities, departmental results and departmental result indicators.
Departmental Results Report (rapport sur les résultats ministériels)
A report on a department’s actual performance in a fiscal year against its plans, priorities and expected results set out in its Departmental Plan for that year. Departmental Results Reports are usually tabled in Parliament each fall.
full‑time equivalent (équivalent temps plein)
A measure of the extent to which an employee represents a full person‑year charge against a departmental budget. Full‑time equivalents are calculated as a ratio of assigned hours of work to scheduled hours of work. Scheduled hours of work are set out in collective agreements.
gender-based analysis plus (GBA Plus) (analyse comparative entre les sexes plus [ACS Plus])
An analytical tool used to support the development of responsive and inclusive policies, programs and other initiatives. GBA Plus is a process for understanding who is impacted by the issue or opportunity being addressed by the initiative; identifying how the initiative could be tailored to meet diverse needs of the people most impacted; and anticipating and mitigating any barriers to accessing or benefitting from the initiative. GBA Plus is an intersectional analysis that goes beyond biological (sex) and socio-cultural (gender) differences to consider other factors, such as age, disability, education, ethnicity, economic status, geography, language, race, religion, and sexual orientation.
government-wide priorities (priorités pangouvernementales)
For the purpose of the 2024–25 Departmental Plan, government-wide priorities are the high-level themes outlining the government’s agenda in the 2021 Speech from the Throne: building a healthier today and tomorrow; growing a more resilient economy; bolder climate action; fighter harder for safer communities; standing up for diversity and inclusion; moving faster on the path to reconciliation and fighting for a secure, just, and equitable world.
horizontal initiative (initiative horizontale)
An initiative in which two or more federal organizations are given funding to pursue a shared outcome, often linked to a government priority.
Indigenous business
As defined on the Indigenous Services Canada website in accordance with the Government of Canada’s commitment that a mandatory minimum target of 5% of the total value of contracts is awarded to Indigenous businesses annually.
non‑budgetary expenditures (dépenses non budgétaires)
Net outlays and receipts related to loans, investments and advances, which change the composition of the financial assets of the Government of Canada.
performance (rendement)
What an organization did with its resources to achieve its results, how well those results compare to what the organization intended to achieve, and how well lessons learned have been identified.
plan (plan)
The articulation of strategic choices, which provides information on how an organization intends to achieve its priorities and associated results. Generally, a plan will explain the logic behind the strategies chosen and tend to focus on actions that lead up to the expected result.
planned spending (dépenses prévues)
For Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports, planned spending refers to those amounts presented in the Main Estimates.
A department is expected to be aware of the authorities that it has sought and received. The determination of planned spending is a departmental responsibility, and departments must be able to defend the expenditure and accrual numbers presented in their Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports.
program (programme)
Individual or groups of services, activities or combinations thereof that are managed together within a department and that focus on a specific set of outputs, outcomes or service levels.
program inventory (répertoire des programmes)
An inventory of a department’s programs that describes how resources are organized to carry out the department’s core responsibilities and achieve its planned results.
result (résultat)
An external consequence attributed, in part, to an organization, policy, program or initiative. Results are not within the control of a single organization, policy, program or initiative; instead, they are within the area of the organization’s influence.
statutory expenditures (dépenses législatives)
Expenditures that Parliament has approved through legislation other than appropriation acts. The legislation sets out the purpose of the expenditures and the terms and conditions under which they may be made.
target (cible)
A measurable performance or success level that an organization, program or initiative plans to achieve within a specified time period. Targets can be either quantitative or qualitative.
voted expenditures (dépenses votées)
Expenditures that Parliament approves annually through an Appropriation Act. The vote wording becomes the governing conditions under which these expenditures may be made.
Page details
- Date modified: