Measles & Rubella Weekly Monitoring Report: January 17 to January 23, 2016 (week 3)
Key Points
- In Canada, 1 new case of measles was reported by British Columbia for week 3, 2016.
- Two provinces, Ontario and British Columbia, have activeFigure 2 - Footnote * measles cases. These events are not linked, as they have resulted from separate importation events.
- A total of 2 cases of measles, and 0 cases of rubella have been reported in Canada in 2016.
Two provinces, Ontario and British Columbia, have activeFigure 2 - Footnote * measles cases. These events are not linked, as they have resulted from separate importation events.
On this page
Organization:
Related Topics
Epidemiological Summary
During epidemiological week 3, 2016, one new case of measles was reported by British ColumbiaFootnote 1. This case had a history of travel to Southeast Asia, and is unrelated to a previously reported measles case.
No cases of rubella were reported. It has been 98 weeks since the last reported rubella case (week 10, 2014).
The year-to-date total is 2 cases of measles and 0 cases of rubella for 2016 (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Number of cases of measles (n=2) and rubella (n=0), by week of rash onset, as reported to the Canadian Measles/ Rubella Surveillance System (CMRSS) and Measles and Rubella Surveillance system (MARS), for the period ending January 23, 2016.
Figure 1 - Text Description
Epidemiological Week of Rash Onset, 2016 | Number of confirmed measles cases reported | Number of confirmed rubella cases reported |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 |
2 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 1 | 0 |
4 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 0 | 0 |
7 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 0 | 0 |
9 | 0 | 0 |
10 | 0 | 0 |
11 | 0 | 0 |
12 | 0 | 0 |
13 | 0 | 0 |
14 | 0 | 0 |
15 | 0 | 0 |
16 | 0 | 0 |
17 | 0 | 0 |
18 | 0 | 0 |
19 | 0 | 0 |
20 | 0 | 0 |
21 | 0 | 0 |
22 | 0 | 0 |
23 | 0 | 0 |
24 | 0 | 0 |
25 | 0 | 0 |
26 | 0 | 0 |
27 | 0 | 0 |
28 | 0 | 0 |
29 | 0 | 0 |
30 | 0 | 0 |
31 | 0 | 0 |
32 | 0 | 0 |
33 | 0 | 0 |
34 | 0 | 0 |
35 | 0 | 0 |
36 | 0 | 0 |
37 | 0 | 0 |
38 | 0 | 0 |
39 | 0 | 0 |
40 | 0 | 0 |
41 | 0 | 0 |
42 | 0 | 0 |
43 | 0 | 0 |
44 | 0 | 0 |
45 | 0 | 0 |
46 | 0 | 0 |
47 | 0 | 0 |
48 | 0 | 0 |
49 | 0 | 0 |
50 | 0 | 0 |
51 | 0 | 0 |
52 | 0 | 0 |
Missing Rash Onset | 0 | 0 |
Cases (year-to-date) | 2 | 0 |
Geographic Distribution
There are currently two activeFigure 2 - Footnote * cases of measles in Canada, reported in British Columbia and the Central East region of Ontario (Figure 2). There are no reported active cases of rubella in Canada (figure not shown).
To date in 2016, measles cases have been reported in two Canadian provinces: British Columbia and Ontario.
Figure 2: Distribution of activeFigure 2 - Footnote *, confirmed measles cases by health regionFigure 2 - Footnote ¥ Figure 2 - Footnote †.
- Figure 2 - Footnote 1
-
Active cases or outbreaks are those in which the onset date of the most recent case/outbreak-associated case falls within 32 days of the issue date of this reportFootnote 2.
- Figure 2 - Footnote 2
-
'No Data' is indicated for jurisdictions that do report cases of measles to the Public Health Agency of Canada, but do not include the public health region variable.
- Figure 2 - Footnote 3
-
One measles case has been reported by British Columbia, but is excluded from this figure.
Figure 2 - Text Description
Health Region | Measles Cases | Rubella Cases |
---|---|---|
Eastern Regional Integrated Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Central Regional Integrated Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Western Regional Integrated Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Labrador-Grenfell Regional Integrated Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Prince Edward Island | 0 | 0 |
South Shore District Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
South West Nova District Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Annapolis Valley District Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Colchester East Hants Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Cumberland Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Pictou County Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Guysborough Antigonish Strait Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Cape Breton District Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Capital District Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Zone 1 (NB) | 0 | 0 |
Zone 2 (NB) | 0 | 0 |
Zone 3 (NB) | 0 | 0 |
Zone 4 (NB) | 0 | 0 |
Zone 5 (NB) | 0 | 0 |
Zone 6 (NB) | 0 | 0 |
Zone 7 (NB) | 0 | 0 |
Québec et Chaudières-Appalaches | 0 | 0 |
Centre-du-Québec | 0 | 0 |
Montréal et Laval | 0 | 0 |
Ouest-du-Québec | 0 | 0 |
Montérégie | 0 | 0 |
Nord-Est | 0 | 0 |
Ontario Central East | 1 | 0 |
Ontario Central West | 0 | 0 |
Ontario Eastern | 0 | 0 |
Ontario North East | 0 | 0 |
Ontario North West | 0 | 0 |
Ontario South West | 0 | 0 |
City of Toronto Health Unit | 0 | 0 |
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Prairie Mountain Health | 0 | 0 |
Interlake-Eastern Regional Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Northern Regional Health Authority | 0 | 0 |
Southern Health | 0 | 0 |
Saskatchewan South | 0 | 0 |
Saskatchewan Central | 0 | 0 |
Saskatchewan North | 0 | 0 |
South Zone | 0 | 0 |
Calgary Zone | 0 | 0 |
Central Zone | 0 | 0 |
Edmonton Zone | 0 | 0 |
North Zone | 0 | 0 |
British Columbia Interior | No data | 0 |
British Columbia Fraser | No data | 0 |
British Columbia Vancouver Coastal | No data | 0 |
British Columbia Vancouver Island | No data | 0 |
British Columbia Northern | No data | 0 |
Yukon | 0 | 0 |
Northwest Territories | 0 | 0 |
Nunavut | 0 | 0 |
|
Laboratory Summary
Measles
To date in 2016, 1 measles case (reported by Ontario) has been genotyped and the genotype was B3 (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Distribution of measles genotypes detected in 2016 (n=1) by weekFigure 3 - Footnote † of rash onset (if available, n=1) or specimen collection (n=0).
- Figure 3 - Footnote †
-
Epidemiological weeks for laboratory specimens are assigned in accordance with WHO guidelines (WHO.WER.2012;9(87):73) with week 1 beginning on the first Monday of the year.
Retour à la référence Figure 3 - Note de bas de page † referrer
Figure 3 - Text Description
Epi week | B3 | B3 - Harare | D4 | D8 | D8 - Taunton | D9 | H1 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
The current global distribution of measles genotypes can be found on the WHO Measles Surveillance website.
For information regarding the interpretation and use of measles genotyping (including a discussion of genotypes and sequence variants), refer to Hiebert J and Severini A. Canada Communicable Disease Report. 2014; 40-12: 257- 260.
Rubella
To date in 2016, no rubella cases have been reported. As such, no genotype information is available.
Footnotes
Page details
- Date modified: