Disciplinary Dismissal

Consultation Report

[PDF 49kb]


Royal Canadian Mounted Police External Review Committee

Chairman
Honourable René J. Marin, OMM, QC, LLD

Vice-Chairman
F. Jennifer Lynch, QC

Members
Joanne McLeod, CM, QC
William Millar
Mary Saunders, QC

Comments are invited; they should be addressed to:

Simon Coakeley
Executive Director
RCMP External Review Committee
Postal Box 1159
Station 'B'
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5R2
FAX: (613) 990-8969


Other publications

Discussion paper 1
Suspensions - A Balanced View
Suspensions - Consultation Report

Discussion paper 2
Relocation - A Painful Process?
Relocation - Consultation Report

Discussion paper 3
Medical Discharge - A Police Perspective
Medical Discharge - Consultation Report

Discussion paper 4
Post-Complaint Management - The Impact of Complaint Procedures on Police Discipline

Post-Complaint Management - Consultation Report

Discussion paper 5
Employee Assistance Programs - Philosophy, theory and practice
Employee Assistance Programs - Consultation Report

Discussion paper 6
Disciplinary Dismissal - A Police Perspective

Discussion paper 7
Off-Duty Conduct

Discussion paper 8
Sanctioning Police Misconduct - General Principles


FOREWORD

The sixth discussion paper published by the RCMP External Review Committee entitled "Disciplinary Dismissal - A Police Perspective" was distributed for consultation in 1991 to several federal and provincial government agencies, federal, provincial and municipal police forces and selected Canadian corporations.

The Committee thanks those who took time to comment on the issues raised in the discussion paper. The information provided in the responses was extremely interesting and very useful to the Committee. As in previous consultation reports, all comments published in this report remain anonymous.

In the Committee's continuing research program, work is currently underway on discussion papers on the evolution of police management, occupational health and safety, conflict of interest and secondary employment.

Simon Coakeley
Executive Director
RCMP External Review Committee


1. Consultation

(a) Method and Objective

In preparing the report on its sixth research topic, Disciplinary Dismissal - A Police Perspective, the RCMP External Review Committee has again used an approach consisting of two phases.

The first phase consists of the preparation of a study by a consultant, following which the Research Directorate of the Committee produces a discussion paper dealing with issues raised by the consultant.

The second phase of the process is a report on the views, ideas and impressions of a predetermined readership on the contents of the discussion paper. In order to preserve confidentiality, the sources of quotations remain anonymous. The role of the Committee's Research Directorate in these consultations is to gather feedback on the form and content of the discussion paper and to complete its comparative analysis of the issues discussed. As well, it may learn of models and options other than those presented in the discussion paper.

To gather the material for this consultation report, the Committee consulted the Deputy Attorneys General and the Deputy Solicitors General of the provinces and territories, the Commissioner and other senior officers of the RCMP and the National Executive of the division staff relations representatives. A large number of police forces, as well as a representative number of members of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police and the Canadian Police Association, were also consulted. In the federal sector, the Committee sought the views of the Public Service Commission, the Department of National Defence, the Department of the Solicitor General and the Department of Justice.

As with other reports, the Committee did not limit its consultation solely to police organizations as this would have limited the variety of responses and ideas. Selected Canadian corporations were also canvassed for their views or comments. The Committee considers it important to get feedback from all types of organizations to broaden the views explored in the paper. In all, 165 individuals and organizations, representing both employers and employees, were provided a copy of the discussion paper for consultation purposes.

(b) Response Rate

In publishing its series of research papers, the Committee is attempting to stimulate discussion, not to take a position on the issue. Because of this, when research is conducted on a problem touching many police forces, the material will not meet the objectives of all forces at all times. As a result, the rate of responses varies considerably from paper to paper, as does the amount of detail in the replies.

The response rate in this consultation process was average, not as high as with some topics, but higher than others. The largest number of respondents, by far, were from police forces, indicating that this is a topic of interest to the police community more than to any other group. Responses were received from the RCMP, provincial police forces, municipal police forces, provincial government officials and senior officials in federal government departments.

While the responses varied somewhat in the amount of detail provided, most included substantive comments. Many respondents provided a considerable amount of detail on the practices and procedures in their organizations, which resulted in lengthy replies.

Response figures were as follows.

Organizations
Percentage of Respondents
Government
- Federal
11.1%
- Provincial
11.1%
- Municipal
0.0%
Police
- Commissions
0.0%
- Forces
77.8%
- Members' Associations
0.0%
Private Sector
0.0%

(c) General Comments

Many of those who provided feedback commenced their discussion with general observations on the paper, its overall quality or its interest to their organizations. These general views are very useful to the Committee because they reinforce the Committee's perception of the value of its research program to the police community. A number of these comments follow.

A number of respondents commented on the usefulness of the paper to their organizations and to others.

Comments were also made on the overall usefulness of the External Review Committee's research program and on topics suggested for examination in future discussion papers.

More specific comments related to interest in reading this consultation report.

Respondents expressed a continuing interest in being involved in the consultation process.

2. Commentary on Content

Most of the respondents commented on substantive elements of the paper. The greatest number of comments related to the role of discipline in police management. Many comments were also received on more specific aspects of the text. Others gave interesting details on discipline and dismissal procedures in their particular organizations and clarified portions of the text which applied to them.

(a) Role of Discipline in Police Management

A sampling of the commentary relating to the role of discipline in police management follows.

There were a number of comments relating to the applicability of private sector procedures to the police community. Some felt that much could be learned from the private sector while others expressed views that the practices used successfully in the private sector could not be easily transposed to the police community.

(b) Discharge

The following comments were made in reaction to the discussion of discharge in the paper.

(c) Public Accountability

One respondent commented on the relationship between public accountability and the disciplinary process.

(d) Clarifications

As anyone who has read the discussion paper would realize, during the period in which that paper was being written and published there were major changes occurring in both Ontario and Quebec with respect to disciplinary dismissal, amongst other things. Respondents from the Ontario Provincial Police and the Montreal Urban Community Police provided the Committee with clarifications of the details presented in the discussion paper. We appreciate their efforts in this regard.

(e) Comments and Information Relating to Respondents' Organizations

The following commentary was received from respondents who wished to share experiences from their organizations.

One respondent made the point that a statement made in the general discussion on legal issues in the discussion paper does not apply to his organization.

(f) Importance of Communication

One respondent had the following suggestion to improve the information exchange between individuals involved in disciplinary cases across the country.

Other respondents talked about the importance of communicating with other interested parties.

3. Conclusion

The commentary received by the Committee indicates that the discussion paper on disciplinary dismissal elicited a good deal of interest within the Canadian police community.

The following comment received by the Committee captures the tone of the majority of respondents.

A large number of comments contained elements of these thoughts. Many respondents, in addition to commenting specifically on the paper, expanded upon the information provided in it. Because the great majority of respondents were from police forces, the views expressed were from a practical outlook and the additional material provided was very informative on the procedures followed in a variety of organizations.

In some cases the paper assisted the readership in reflecting on their own disciplinary processes; in others, it was suggested that the paper will be useful when the time comes to review and amend existing legislation.

The comment was made by several respondents that it is valuable to have an insight into what is going on in other organizations, even if the procedures followed are somewhat different. In the same way, the views expressed during the consultation process add to this sharing of information which benefits the readership.

Conclusions which can be reached on the basis of the respondents' views are the following.

  1. While more managers are leaning towards non-punitive disciplinary measures, the disciplinary processes tend to be based on a punitive model.
  2. While differences in procedure and methods of operation across the country are inevitable, somewhat more consistency would undoubtedly be better for both the police and the public.
  3. Effective communication between managers and employees is a key element to improve disciplinary systems.
  4. While there are obvious differences between the police environment and the private sector, there are nevertheless lessons to be learned from successful companies.

The purpose of this consultation process based on the discussion paper on disciplinary dismissal has been to promote the discussion and communication of views on this important human resource management issue within the police community.

Page details

Date modified: