Employer restructuring / Succession of employers
This article provides information on the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and the Employment Insurance Act (EIA) dealing with employer restructuring and succession of employers.
The Budget Implementation Act 2004 included amendments to the CPP and the EIA. In particular, certain modifications consider that the employment of a person is continuous when they have a new employer following the changes which have occurred in the structure of the employer's company.
Before 2004, when an employer restructured, employees were treated as if they had joined a new employer. This would often occur as a result of a winding-up and immediate reconstruction under a different legal structure, or when one employer acquired a major or distinct part of another employer's property or business (for example, a distinct division of a business was sold to another enterprise). As a result, the new employer had to begin withholding CPP contributions and employment insurance (EI) premiums again, and making employer contributions, without considering the amounts withheld by the previous employer.
Succession of employers
Subsection 9(2) of the CPP and section 82.1 of the EIA deal with employer restructuring and in particular with succession of employers. A successor employer can consider an employee's employment to be continuous when there has been a change in the business structure of the employer.
The legislation concerning the succession of employers found in subsection 9(2) of the CPP and section 82.1 of the EIA can be summarized as follows:
- the formation of a corporation; or
- the dissolution of a corporation; or
- the acquisition of all or part of a business;
then the successor employer may consider the amounts deducted, remitted, or paid under the CPP or the EIA, or both, by the former employer for the employment of the employees for the year as if they had been deducted, remitted, or paid by the successor employer.
Here are four explanations that will provide you with a better understanding of the interpretation of subsection 9(2) of the CPP and section 82.1 of the EIA.
What does with the agreement of the former employer mean?
This refers to the contractual agreement that describes the terms and conditions for the successor employer to acquire all or part of the business of the former employer.
What does by operation of law mean?
This refers to the situation where a federal or provincial statute enables assets and employees to be transferred from one legal entity to another.
For an example of an employer restructuring by operation of law, see Example 6.
What does immediately succeeds mean?
This means that the employment of one or more of the former employer's employees continues with the successor employer. In other words, the successor employer is taking over the employment contracts of these employees as part of the overall contractual agreement between the successor employer and the former employer or, the successor employer is taking over the employment contracts of these employees by operation of law.
Immediately succeeds does not necessarily mean that the employee has to report to work for the successor employer the very next day after the restructuring. A reasonable delay would be acceptable depending on the circumstances of the particular file.
For an example of an employer who immediately succeeds another employer, see Example 5.
What does the acquisition of all or part of a business mean?
This refers to situations where a successor employer acquires all or part of the former employer's business assets (capital or intangible assets) that can reasonably be regarded as necessary for the successor employer to be capable of carrying on the business.
Note: To meet this particular requirement, the successor employer has to acquire all or part of the former employer's business assets, tangible or not. For example, in the context of a corporate reorganization, we will consider that a successor employer will have acquired all or part of the business even if the agreement only provides for the transfer of the staff from the former employer to the successor employer.
Self-employment succeeded by employment
Subsection 9(3) of the CPP titled Self-employment succeeded by employment can be summarized as follows:
If a person ceases to be self-employed and becomes an employee of a corporation that they control, then the corporation (the successor employer) may:
- consider the amount of contributory self-employed earnings of that person in that year as their contributory salary and wages paid by the corporation in that year; and
- consider one half of the person's contributions on self-employed earnings in that year as an amount deducted, remitted, or contributed as an employee for that year, and the other half of the contributions as an amount remitted or contributed for the employer for that year.
Contributory self-employed earnings are defined in section 13 of the CPP.
Employment succeeded by self-employment
Subsection 10(2) of the CPP titled Employment succeeded by self-employment can be summarized as follows:
If a person becomes self-employed after ceasing to be an employee of a corporation that they control, that person may:
- consider the amount of contributory salary and wages paid by the corporation in the year as their contributory self-employed earnings in that year; and
- consider the amounts deducted, remitted, or contributed by the corporation in relation to their contributions, and the employer's contributions for the year, as their contributions from self-employment earnings in that year.
Contributory salary and wages is defined in section 12 of the CPP.
What does controlled by that person mean?
This usually refers to the situation where that individual controls more than 50% of the voting shares of the corporation in question.
For an example of an employer restructuring involving a corporation controlled by that person, see Example 1.
How to apply the legislation – Examples
Example 1 — Formation of a corporation
A proprietor operating a business with several employees decides to incorporate in the year 2020. The proprietor transfers all the business assets to the corporation, which he controls, and the corporation employs these same workers. Three months later, the corporation hires an additional employee.
- The corporation may consider the amount of CPP contributions and EI premiums previously withheld during the year for the employees who were previously employed by the proprietor.
- For the additional employee hired a few months later, the corporation will not be able to consider the amount of CPP contributions and/or EI premiums previously withheld during the year by the previous employer, since there was no formation, dissolution, or acquisition between the corporation and the previous employer of the last employee hired.
- This corporation controlled by the former proprietor may also:
- consider the former proprietor's contributory self-employed earnings in the year as their contributory salary and wages paid by the corporation in that year; and
- consider one half of the former proprietor's CPP contributions on self-employed earnings in the year as an amount deducted, remitted, or contributed in relation to their contributions for that year, and the other half as an amount remitted or contributed in relation to the employer's contributions for that year.
Example 2 — Dissolution of a corporation
In 2021, the shareholders of a corporation decide that it is in their best interest to dissolve the corporate charter and to reincorporate as a new legal identity. It is decided that the new corporation will immediately employ the same workers previously employed by the former corporation whose charter has now been dissolved. All of the former corporation's assets are transferred to the new corporation.
- The new corporation would be able to consider the amounts of CPP contributions or EI premiums, or both, paid, deducted, and remitted previously in that year by the former employer, since it immediately succeeded the former corporation as the employer of the employees in question and acquired all of the business assets of the former employer.
Example 3 — Acquisition of all or part of a business
Company A sells its property management division to Company B during the year 2021. Company B hires 80% of the employees that were employed in Company A's property management division. Company B immediately succeeds Company A as the employer of the employees who are part of the 80%.
- Company B would be able to consider the amount of CPP contributions or EI premium, or both, previously paid, deducted, and remitted by Company A during that year when calculating the CPP contributions and EI premiums to be deducted from the remuneration paid to these employees.
Example 4 — Acquisition of all or part of a business
Company A owns 100% of Company B. On June 1, 2020, Company A transfers all of its employees to Company B. In the transfer agreement between the two companies, Company B is required to honour all the contractual agreements that were in place between Company A and its former employees who are now employees of Company B. The transferred employees are now performing the same function with Company B as they had been performing previously with Company A. On May 31, 2020, these employees were reporting to work for Company A, and as of June 1, 2020, they started reporting to work for Company B. There was no other transfer of assets between the two companies.
- Company B has met the conditions of subsection 9(2) of the CPP and section 82.1 of the EIA.
- The transfer of all the employees from Company A to Company B was with the agreement of the former employer (Company A).
- The successor employer (Company B) immediately succeeded the former employer (Company A) as the employer of the employees transferred.
Example 5 — Immediately succeeds
In 2021, Company B, desiring to expand its operation from solely that of a wholesaler, decides to acquire two retail outlets from Company A. Following the acquisition of these two retail outlets, Company B becomes the successor employer to 10 employees previously employed with Company A and Company B spends a short period of time remodelling the two retail outlets before they are reopened. The transfer of these 10 employees from Company A to Company B is part of the transaction, even though their actual work with Company B was delayed a short time to enable company B to complete the renovations.
- Company B can take into consideration the amount of CPP contributions and EI premiums previously withheld during the year on the 10 employees that were previously employed with Company A.
- Company B acquired part of a business from the former employer (Company A).
- Company B immediately succeeded Company A as the employer of these 10 employees even though their actual work with Company B may have been delayed a short period of time to allow for the renovations.
Example 6 — By operation of law
In 2020, a province makes amendments to its Electricity Act. The amendments require that any provincial or municipal entity engaged in producing or distributing hydroelectricity within that province must incorporate under the provisions of the Electricity Act by June 1 of that year. The Electricity Act provides the authority for issuing corporate charters. The provincial and municipal entities were previously incorporated under the authority of other provincial legislation. These entities transferred all their employees, as well as most of their production and distribution related assets, to the corporations newly incorporated under the authority of the Electricity Act.
These new corporations would be able to consider the amount of CPP contributions or EI premiums, or both, paid, deducted, and remitted previously during the year by the former employers because:
- each new corporation is a result of a formation of a corporation;
- the successor employer acquired all of the business of the former employer; and
- it was by operation of law.
Example 7 — Conditions of the legislation not fulfilled
Company A and Company B are the two most important firms operating in a very competitive market. During 2020, Company A wants to increase its market share, hires some of Company B's sales staff (without consulting Company B). Company A has not met the conditions of subsection 9(2) of the CPP or section 82.1 of the EIA and, therefore, may not take into consideration the amount of CPP contributions or EIA premiums previously deducted, remitted, or paid by Company B in 2020 for the new-hired employees.
How to request a ruling
If you are not sure whether CPP contributions or EI premiums, or both, are payable in a particular restructuring or succession of employers situation, you can ask the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) for a ruling. For more information, see How to obtain a CPP/EI ruling.
For information on the possible implications of a CPP/EI ruling, go to Have you received a CPP/EI ruling?
For more information
To get more information, call the CRA’s business enquiries line at 1-800-959-5525.
- Sections 8, 9, 10, and 21 of the Canada Pension Plan (external link)
- Subsections 8(1), 8(1.1), 8(1.2), 9(2), 9(3), and 10(2) of the Canada Pension Plan (external link)
- Paragraph 6(1)(a) of the Canada Pension Plan (external link)
- Sections 82 and 82.1 of the Employment Insurance Act (external link)
- Paragraph 5(1)(a) of the Employment Insurance Act (external link)
Report a problem or mistake on this page
- Date modified: