President of the Treasury Board Appearance Before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates (OGGO) on November 4, 2020

Table of Contents

Opening statement and presentation

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21: government-wide / major items

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21: TBS perspective

2020–21 Main Estimates: government-wide / major items

2020–21 Main Estimates: TBS perspective

2020–21 Departmental Plans

Hot issues for TBS: supply cycle

COVID-19 HR management and guidance

Public servants: general

Office of the Auditor General

Long-term care facilities

Other TBS directives and guidance: COVID-19

Opening statement and presentation

1. Opening statement

In this section

Introduction

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I would like to thank the committee for inviting me here today to discuss the 2020–2021 Main Estimates, which were originally tabled last February. I will also speak to the Supplementary Estimates (B), just recently tabled.

With me today is:

  • Glenn Purves, Assistant Secretary, Expenditure Management Sector;
  • Karen Cahill, Assistant Secretary and Chief Financial Officer; and
  • Sandra Hassan, Assistant Deputy Minister, Employment Conditions and Labour Relations

Main Estimates

To begin, I would like to bring your attention to the 2020–21 Main Estimates.

These Main Estimates provide a detailed view of responsible government spending to support the creation of opportunities for Canadians from coast-to-coast-to-coast and reinforce Canada’s status as a responsible citizen of the global community.

They present a total of $125.1 billion of budgetary voted expenditures, and $87.2 million in non-budgetary voted expenditures.

These Main Estimates also include information on $179.5 billion of statutory budgetary spending and $3.0 billion of statutory non-budgetary spending.

As members of the Committee continue to review the Main Estimates and supporting documentation, it will become clear that the Government’s spending plan is closely aligned with the priorities expressed by Canadians.

That includes the understanding that Canada must continue to work toward reconciliation with Indigenous peoples.

The expenditure plan describes significant amounts for Indigenous health and social services, for greater access to early learning opportunities, and new investments to advance the proven benefits of Indigenous self-determination in education.

Mr. Chair, Canadians understand that we have an obligation to be a force for good in the world. The spending plans in the Main Estimates support measures to advance human rights, invest in our armed forces and diversify Canada’s trade and investment opportunities.

We recognize that the environment and the economy go hand in hand.

This is why the expenditure plan includes significant investments in measures promoting clean growth and climate change mitigation.

Finally, with regard to my own department, the planned spending related to the Treasury Board includes $2.2 billion to meet our obligations under the public service insurance plans, as well as a contribution of $282,000 to the Open Government Partnership.

The expenditure budget also provides central appropriations that are essential to help the government tackle pressing issues and accelerate the implementation of programs and services in a responsible manner.

Supplementary Estimates (B)

Mr. Chair, I will now speak briefly about the 2020–21 Supplementary Estimates (B).

These Supplementary Estimates present expenditure information that was incomplete when the Main Estimates were prepared or that has since been refined to reflect the evolution of certain programs and services.

Supplementary Estimates (B) continue to account for spending authorized by COVID-19 emergency measures legislation, ensuring transparency and accountability in the use of public funds for the delivery of programs and services to Canadians.

These Estimates present a total of $79.2 billion in budgetary spending, including $20.9 billion to be voted on by Parliament and $58.3 billion in forecast statutory expenditures.

Of these amounts, roughly 74% of the voted requirements and 96% of the additional statutory forecasts are for the Government’s emergency and economic responses to COVID-19.

The voted spending in these Estimates for emergency responses to COVID-19 includes:

  • $5.4 billion for medical research and vaccine development; and
  • $2.2 billion for purchases of personal protective gear, medical equipment and supplies.

There are also economic responses to the pandemic.

These include $2.4 billion in support for small and medium-sized businesses, salary top-ups for essential workers, and funding for provinces and territories to safely restart their economies and bring students back to school.

In addition, my department, the Treasury Board Secretariat, will receive $585 million for Public Service Insurance plans and programs.

Conclusion

Mr. Chair, our Government has a responsibility to ensure Canadians have the support they need during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to promote economic recovery and prosperity going forward.

We do this by investing in critical health care and supporting the safe restart of our economy. Our spending plans will help Canada thrive and succeed.

My officials and I thank you again for the invitation to appear before you today.

We would now be pleased to take questions from the Committee.

2. Committee overview

In this section

Master overview of the committee: Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates (OGGO)

Committee members
Chair
Robert Kitchen Conservative Souris–Moose Mountain New Member (has subbed on the Committee before)
Vice-Chair
Francis Drouin Liberal Glengarry–Prescott–Russell Returning Member (42nd and 43-1 Parliament)
Julie Vignola Bloc Québécois Beauport–Limoilou Returning Member (43-1 Parliament)
Members
Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau

Returning Member (42nd and 43-1 Parliament)

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of PSPC

Dane Lloyd Conservative Sturgeon River–Parkland

New Member

Digital Government Critic

Pierre Paul-Hus Conservative Charlesbourg–Haute-Saint-Charles New Member
Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West Returning Member (42nd and 43-1 Parliament)
Matthew Green New Democratic Party Hamilton Centre

Returning Member (42nd and 43-1 Parliament)

TBS Critic

Ethics Deputy Critic

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill Returning Member (42nd and 43-1 Parliament)
Irek Kusmierczyk Liberal Windsor–Tecumseh Returning Member (43-1 Parliament)
Patrick Weiler Liberal West Vancouver–Sunshine Coast–Sea to Sky Country Returning Member (43-1 Parliament)

TBS Related Committee Activity: 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session

Anticipated business
  • 2020–21 Main Estimates
  • 2020–21 Supplementary Estimates
  • Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Administration of the Canada Student Service Grant and WE Charity
  • Shipbuilding Procurement
  • IT Infrastructure improvements
  • NuTech Contracts

On September 23, 2020, the House of Commons adopted a motion authorizing all House of Commons Standing Committee Members to have the ability to attend meetings either by videoconference or in person. The authorization is in effect until December 11, 2020.

Meeting summaries
October 26, 2020: committee business

The meeting started late due to votes in the House of Commons.

Mr. Pierre Paul-Hus (CPC) proposed a motion that the Committee undertake a study of the federal contract for 10,000 pandemic ventilators awarded to FIT and fabricated by Baylis medical and that the Committee report back to the House of Commons by November 20, 2020.

  • The LPC did not think this study was necessary as other committees have committed to studying similar studies (like HESA). They encouraged the Committee to take on studies that were productive.
  • The CPC were critical of the LPC’s lengthy interventions on the matter and suggested adjourning debate on the motion.

The Committee agreed to adjourn debate on the motion.

Mr. Matthew Green (NDP) had moved a motion during the October 8, 2020, meeting regarding previous studies. During the October 19, 2020, in camera meeting the LPC had proposed an amendment to the motion to extend the time period to December 31, 2020, and to remove the section requesting that the Committee study the WE Charity contract (the full text of the amended motion is at the end of the document). The Committee agreed to resume debate on the amendment of the motion.

  • The NDP expressed frustration at the nature of the proceedings in both the House of Commons and the various Committees.
  • The LPC encouraged the Committee to consider the studies that had already been passed for consideration by the Committee instead of moving other motions for studies. They moved to adjourn debate on the amendment to the motion, which was adopted.

The Committee agreed to adjourn and moved in camera to the subcommittee to further discuss the Committee’s agenda.

October 8, 2020: election of Chair and committee business

The Committee held the first meeting of the second session of the 43rd Parliament. Mr. Robert Kitchen (CPC) was named the Chair of the Committee, and Mr. Francis Drouin (LPC) and Mme Julie Vignola (BQ) were re-instated as first and second Vice-Chairs.

The Committee passed several routine motions and then moved into regular business to consider motions proposed by all parties for the future studies of the Committee.

Debate was adjourned on a motion by the LPC to study shipbuilding procurement in order to allow the sub committee to discuss an approach forward since it is such a detailed and vast topic to consider. Debate was also adjourned on a motion by the NDP to reinstate all past committee business and motions since the Committee Members did not have the lengthy motion in writing.

The Committee adopted 3 motions proposed by the CPC to study the Main Estimates 2020–21 (currently the motion is only to invite the Minister of PSPC and senior officials), to study the Government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic (with a focus on procurement), and to study and request all documentation on the Nutech Contracts.

The Committee adopted a motion proposed by the CPC and amended by the BQ to study the IT Infrastructure improvements by the Federal Government due to the influx of teleworking and the performance of IT infrastructure for social programs during and after the pandemic.

Debate was adjourned on a BQ motion to create a Special Committee to study the CSSG and the WE Charity to allow for consultations across parties on similar motions moved by the NDP.

TBS related committee activity: 43rd Parliament, 1st Session

Meeting summaries
August 13, 2020: administration of the Canada Student Service Grant and WE Charity) – (charitable sector observers)

Witnesses appeared from Charity Intelligence Canada and the Charity Report. The witnesses from Charity Intelligence Canada had previously testified at FINA on August 6, 2020, in regard to their study on Government Spending, WE Charity and the Canada Student Service Grant.

The exchanges between members and witnesses were tense at times, but overall, the tone of the meeting was professional. Witnesses frequently corrected members’ statements ensuring that the record was accurate. Opposition Members discussed the capacity WE Charity had to deliver this program, such as their ability to deliver in both official languages, their financial holdings and overall accountability. Opposition Members questioned the due diligence performed by the Government when evaluating the Canada Student Service Grant delivery through WE Charity, referring specifically to the criteria within the Treasury Board Frameworks and Regulations.

Government members questioned the witnesses about the framework used to evaluate Canadian charities and the ability for most charities to operate at a national level.

Thursday, July 23, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (PSPC procurement update)

PSPC officials appeared before to provide an update on PPE procurement. The Deputy Minister delivered an opening statement which was followed by several rounds of questions.

Officials received questions on the procurement and delivery schedule of ventilators; the standing up of domestic suppliers; preparations for a second wave; efforts to prepare federal buildings for a return to work; the risk of not receiving international orders; product standards; the leasing of warehouses for stockpiling purposes; the Essential Services Emergency Reserve; safeguards to ensure contracts are not going to companies that could be violating human rights or using forced labour; the impact of COVID-19 on Phoenix issues; Amazon Canada; the Nuctech security contract; the Supply Council; healthcare centres; international market price for PPE: Policy on the Ethical Procurement of Apparel; the JSS; and Indigenous companies.

Thursday, July 9, 2020: meeting requested by four members of the committee (to discuss the administration of the Canada Student Service Grant)

The Conservative Members tabled the motion inviting the Minister of Public Services and Procurement, President of the Treasury Board, the Minister of Employment and Social Development Canada, and the Minister of Diversity and Inclusion and Youth to appear regarding a study on the distribution of the Canadian Student Service Grant (CSSG) and the WE Charity. Members of the CPC, NDP and the BQ all agreed that a better understanding of the events that transpired was necessary and that the committee would need to understand the appropriate process and the lessons learned. The LPC members agreed with the motion but raised that TBS and PSPC were not directly involved and could only speak to processes and guidelines.

Mr. McCauley (CPC) was critical of departments not following TBS guidelines on purchases. He also consulted the PBO on the violation of TBS rules and frameworks regarding departments spending on the Estimates. ATIPs are not being performed at full capacity in most departments, so the committee did not have this resource to use to get information quickly.

Friday, June 19, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (transparency)

The Committee met for the 15th time in the context of its study on the Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Specifically, it considered transparency and access to information issues. All witnesses supported the assertion that Canada’s Access to Information Act is in dire need of modernization. The Information Commissioner made comments about some recommendations she intends to put forward as part of the review of the act, including an independent review of exemptions made for Cabinet Confidences, and improvements to the way third party information is protected by the legislation. In this context, Matthew Green (NDP) reiterated comments he has made previously concerning his intention to test Parliamentary Privilege against the principles Cabinet Confidence and Solicitor-Client Privilege. Kelly McCauley (CPC) made direct references to TBS not being among those departments with a fully operational ATIP unit during the pandemic, and to past comments from the A/CIO at TBS which gave him the impression the issue may not be treated with the seriousness it deserves.

During the second panel, in some instances prompted by member questions, all witnesses spoke to their impression that additional protections for whistleblowers are required through the PSDPA. Kelly McCauley (CPC) repeated his past references at Committee and in the House to the fact that previous and successive Presidents of the Treasury Board have not responded to OGGO’s invitations to discuss the government’s progress in implementing those recommendations.

Tuesday, June 16, 2020: Supplementary Estimates (A) 2020–21

Treasury Board officials appeared alongside officials from Finance as a part of their study on the Supplementary Estimates (A) 2020–21. Mr. Purves from TBS provided the Committee with an overview of the items in the Supplementary Estimates (A) 2020–21. He also discussed the process for the Interim Supply and how the Government was remaining transparent in publishing a clear explanation of where the public funds are going and how they are being spent. Members had specific questions for Treasury Board officials about funding for PCO Advertising related to COVID-19 and the choice not to use Vote 5, as well as the increase in use and spending of the Public Service Disability Plan.

Members also questioned Treasury Board on the specifics of the Joint Ship building programs and the CIRNA settlements (Indian Day Schools – McLean and Sixties Scoop). Finance officials explained that a budget would be released when the timing was correct and the difference and the different uses of a budget and a fiscal update.

Friday, June 12, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (procurement of PPE)

Canada Post and Purolator appeared for the first hour – questions from the Members had a focus on the various measures both organizations had taken to protect their employees during the pandemic and the volume they were experiencing. The Liberal members questioned the Canada Post witness on the responsibilities for the delivery of PPE between Canada Post, Purolator and the Government. Representatives from Galenova Inc. and Medline Canada appeared for the second hour. They were asked about their progress with developing various types of medical supplies and the process in which Government contracts came into play.

Tuesday, June 9, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (procurement, Phoenix and government COVID-19 emergency benefits – PSPC, ESDC)

PSPC appeared for the first hour – Conservative members focused their questions on contracts for N95 masks and how much money was being prepaid to companies for masks that did not meet Canadian standards for quality. There was also a question about the money for challenger jets. The Bloc Q focussed on the Phoenix pay system, particularly on the number of departments that have not transferred their information over to PSPC and how this impacts the overall figures being reported. The New Democratic Party questioned the Minister about the resignation of former Liberal Cabinet Minister Cathy Bennet and questioned whether any other board members might have similar conflicts of interest.

ESDC appeared during the second hour and responded to the Committee’s questions about the various COVID-19 Emergency Benefits. The tone was tense at times. Members questions focused on the mechanisms in place to prevent fraud for the application of the emergency benefits. Bloc Members were curious about why Service Canada centres hadn’t yet reopened. Conservative members questioned the Minister on clarification for mortgage eligibility and the housing market.

Friday, June 5, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (industry groups – ISED)

Members questioned witnesses on the Government funded private industry companies, how they were chosen, and how many will receive non-repayable loans or grants. There were further questions on the contract with Medicom. There were also questions around improvements for testing and research. Members from all parties had questions on contract tracing and who gets to own the data and how the technology for that will work.

Monday, June 1, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada)

Members questions focused around Canada’s engagement with China and other countries regarding trade, policies and agreements. Discussions on Canada’s involvement with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) provided the committee with Mr. Nagy’s expert opinion. Mr. Genius maintained that Canada should not be involved in the AIIB as Canada only holds 1% of voting shares while China holds 40%. Mr. Nagy’s main point was for Canada to create and foster relationships with other like-minded middle power countries. Members continued to express concern with possible repercussions from China and how Canada can prepare.

Friday, May 29, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (oversight of government activities – OAG and PBO)

The Auditor General and the Parliamentary Budget Officer appeared to discuss their assessment on the Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The Parliamentary Budget Officer discussed the reports that had already been released and the upcoming reports related to the federal measures released for the COVID-19 pandemic. Mr. Giroux maintained that the fiscal measures could not be extended nor be made permanent without serious consequences. The Members questions focused on various scenarios of Canada’s fiscal situations and what the cost and consequences of the CERB are in relation to incentives for Canadians to get back to work. During an exchange with Mr. McCauley, Mr. Giroux expressed that he was having difficulty getting information from the Department of National Defence and revealed that he has not been provided a comprehensive list of infrastructure projects by the Department of Infrastructure. The PBO committed to a study and report on the use of code 699 for public servants. He was also critical of the process chosen to study the Supplementary Estimates (A) and stressed that a 4-hour Committee of the Whole was not enough to study the expected significant amount of spending.

The Auditor General gave an overview of the requests for audits from the House of Commons. Ms. Hogan confirmed that no special warrants have been issued. All performance audit work has been delayed due to the amount of resources the Office of the Auditor General has and they will focus on the audits passed by the motions in the House of Commons. Like the testimony Ms. Hogan gave at the Public Accounts Committee on May 19, 2020, she reiterated that funding remained an issue and that she is intending to maintain the conversation. Members questioned Ms. Hogan on the COVID-19 audit and what this study may look like. Members also showed concern about the lack of funding and the consequence of having audits cancelled.

Monday, May 25, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (cyber security – Minister of Digital Government)

The Committee met for the ninth time as part of its study on the Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. The focus of today’s meeting was cyber security.

Members asked questions about information management, security, and privacy concerns both in general, and specific to eventual contact tracing efforts. Several exchanges focused on the work the government has undertaken to support remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic, how existing work in the Digital Government portfolio has been impacted by that same reality, and how the government has and continues to prevent, repel, and guard against cyber security threats.

Most exchanges and interventions were cordial and informative, especially during the Minister’s appearance.

Friday, May 22, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (distribution of medical supplies)

The Committee met with a representative from the Canada Postal Workers Union. The witness discussed the number of COVID-19 cases and the inability to protect the members. She is hoping to get more PPE supplies for her members.

Members expressed their appreciation to CUPW members and expressed that they were impressed that the workplaces are COVID free. Ms. Simpson expressed that they need a contract and that Canada Post should improve their proactivity in keeping members safe by purchasing PPE materials.

Friday, May 15, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (federal procurement and the national emergency strategic stockpile – PSPC, PHAC)

Questions from members focused on the sole-source contract with Medicom, Deloitte’s role and involvement in PSPC’s procurement of PPE, the manifest of the 30 flights that arrived, details around purchase orders and how masks/respirators are being referred to and PSPC’s knowledge of subcontractor of Medicom (referring to SNC Lavalin). At the end of the meeting, opposition members commented on their increasing frustration that they do not feel they are getting answers to their questions, or feel they are continuously being redirected to others. The tone of meetings has grown noticeably more combative. Government members submitted there is a shared responsibility when it comes to requesting and prompting witness testimony: members should also be asking questions that fall within the witnesses’ responsibilities.

Monday, May 11, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (distribution of emergency benefits – ESDC, CRA)

The Committee met for the sixth time to discuss the distribution of emergency benefits in the Government’s response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Members questioned the Ministers on specific issues related to the processing and eligibility of the CERB, the CEWS, and EI-related matters. They were curious about statistics and figures such as the number of applications and the number of people and businesses reapplying. The members raised concerns about the number of hours public servants were working in order to process these applications at a rapid pace.

Friday, May 8, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (public servants – TBS, public service unions)

The Committee met for the fifth time as part of its study on the Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic, specifically to discuss public servants. The meeting was separated in two parts: the first hour was an appearance by the President of the Treasury Board, supported by the Chief Human Resources Officer, the Chief Information Officer of Canada and TBS officials, and the second hour testimony from the Presidents of various unions. The tone was cordial and professional, the Members all expressed their gratitude for the hard work public servants are doing. The Members had questions for TBS officials concerning contracting guidelines for things such as PPE, the accommodations made for public servants working at home, and what was happening with the employees on paid leave. The Union representatives expressed that they were satisfied with the Government’s response for public servants during the pandemic and described what their members were doing to help Canadians during this difficult time. They outlined some outstanding issues, such as contract negotiations and expressed their concern about return to the workplace for their members.

Monday, May 4, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (allocation of emergency benefits – TBS-EMS and Finance Canada)

Questions to TBS witnesses focused on the changes to the Supply and Estimates process, and on whether the Treasury Board has continued to play a role in overseeing spending. Neither issue was raised or discussed in a contentious manner. Members expressed an overall interest in transparency, oversight, and accountability as far as financial procedures are concerned. The majority of questions were primarily directed at Finance Canada.

Friday, May 1, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (medical sector)

Questions from members focused on supply chain management, domestic manufacturing capacity and ongoing efforts to scale up, impressions on collaboration with government, and where efforts could be made to improve readiness in the future. All witnesses spoke extremely positively of their engagement experience with all levels of government to date and testified to the exceptional nature of collaboration between multiple levels of government, other public sector entities, and private businesses. Witnesses from medical businesses spoke to their important contributions to Canada’s domestic supply and production as far as testing efforts are concerned and emphasized their prioritization of domestic needs over those originating from the international market. Witness testimony also focused on the importance of considering the health and safety of vulnerable and at-risk populations as pandemic management efforts continue. It was also expressed that funding for health care capacity and research in general has not kept up with costs, which affects system readiness in handling crises.

Thursday, April 30, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (support for businesses – ISED, PSPC, Procurement Ombudsman)

Testimony from and questioning to ISED representatives focused on supports being offered to Canadian businesses to encourage production and innovation in the context of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In collaboration with Health Canada, PHAC, and PSPC, the ultimate objective is to increase domestic manufacturing capacity for personal protective equipment and testing components. A number of questions centred on procurement and health advice, to which ISED witnesses were not best placed to provide responses. The second panel dealt more narrowly with the procurement process and efforts made by government to help businesses navigate it. Kelly McCauley (CPC) expressed concern that the use of sole-source contracting could spike as a result of crisis-related efforts; witnesses expressed oversight of procurement contracting would need to continue in order to ensure there were no abuses.

Friday, April 24, 2020: Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic (federal procurement – PSPC)

Minister Anita Anand gave thanks to the people behind the scenes and interpreters for making sure Canadians have the latest information. She spoke about the new challenges Canadians are facing during this crisis and the Government’s commitment to commitment to helping avoid the spread. Minister Anand highlighted that we continue to procure necessary Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including masks, gloves, gowns and other supplies. She outlined the process and the call-out on Buy and Sell to companies. She noted that there is a ramping up of domestic purchases and retooling efforts. She spoke about the close collaboration with industries and Provinces and Territories to ensure procurement of supplies. Committee members focused their questions around the empty planes from China, contract with Amazon and the National Stockpile.

Thursday, March 12, 2020: MDG appearance on Supplementary Estimates (B) 2019–20

The Committee met to consider the subject matter of the Supplementary Estimates (B), 2019–20 and the Departmental Results Reports for 2018–19. The Minister of Public Services and Procurement appeared immediately after the Minister of Digital Government.

Questions to the Minister from members focused primarily on the progress in transitioning to a more digital government, and on the Minister’s Mandate Letter commitment to identify all core and at-risk IT systems and platforms. Questions from the CPC member were framed by the suggestion that government is failing to transition to digital service delivery effectively. During the meeting, Ziad Aboultaif (CPC) moved a motion for the Committee to study the Government’s aging IT infrastructure. The study would involve appearances by the Ministers of PSPC, of Employment Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion, of National Revenue, and of Digital Government. Debate on the motion was adjourned without a vote.

Tuesday, March 10, 2020: Review of the Red Tape Reduction Act (TBS-RAS)

The Committee met to begin its review of the Red Tape Reduction Act (RTRA). The Committee’s findings must be reported to the House before the end of June 2020. Witnesses provided the Committee with an introductory overview to the act and One-for-One Rule. Most questions were directed to or fielded by the witness from TBS. Broadly, questions from all members focused on the effectiveness of efforts to diminish regulatory burden on businesses. Prominent cross-party topics also included the cost of administering the regime, and consideration of cumulative vs. administrative burden. Many of the questions from the CPC, specifically, were framed by the suggestion that government efforts in managing the RTRA regime are ineffective or insufficient, and that more should be done to reduce administrative burden on businesses.

Thursday, February 27, 2020: PTB appearance on Supplementary Estimates (B) 2019–20

The Committee held its first meeting regarding the consideration of Supplementary Estimates (B) 2019–20. The President and officials discussed Estimates Reform and spoke candidly about the lessons learned from the pilot project, as well as the feedback from Parliamentarians for its development. A great deal concern was expressed by the Opposition Committee members regarding Vote 10 and the significant increase in funds it has received. The Minister and officials explained the various uses of the Vote, such as horizontal initiatives. The Liberal members questioned the Minister on climate change initiatives and IT infrastructure improvements, as well as efforts towards Indigenous relations. The Bloc Québécois questioned the Minister on how provincial transfers work for such things as student loans and health care.

Thursday, February 20, 2020: election of Chair

Tom Lukiwski (CPC) was elected Chair of the Committee (Previous Chair during 42nd Parliament). Francis Drouin (LPC) was elected first vice-chair; Julie Vignola (BQ) was elected second vice-chair. The Committee will next meet on Tuesday, February 25, 2020, from 8:45 a.m. to 10:45 a.m. in camera. For the first hour, the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure will discuss future Committee business; for the second hour, officials from TBS’s Expenditure Management Sector have been invited to provide a briefing on the Estimates process. The Committee discussed devoting its meetings on February 27, 2020, and March 10 and 12, 2020, to Supplementary Estimates B, and inviting TBS, SSC and PSPC.

Chair: Robert Kitchen (Manitoba–Souris–Moose Mountain) – Conservative member

Robert Kitchen (Manitoba–Souris–Moose Mountain)
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Souris–Moose Mountain in 2015.
  • Educated as a chiropractor and served on several provincial and federal committees prior to entering politics in 2015.
  • Served as a Member on the Health Committee in the 43-1 Parliament and as the Vice-Chair on the Veterans Affairs Committee in the 42nd Parliament.
  • Has previously subbed for Conservative Members on the OGGO Committee in past Parliaments
Interest in TBS Portfolio
  • 43rd Parliament
    • Written Questions: Relevant topic regarding research or speech writing services to Ministers *general interest in Environmental issues
  • 42nd Parliament
    • Written Questions: Topics included personal information requests which take longer than 30 days, Disbursements through the Treasury Board Secretariat for trustee fees, and videos produced by the Government *general interest in Environmental issues

1st Vice-Chair: Francis Drouin (Ontario–Glengarry–Prescott–Russell) – Liberal member

Francis Drouin (Glengarry–Prescott–Russell)
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Glengarry–Prescott–Russell in 2015.
  • A member of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates and the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food. Also a previous member of both those Committees in the 42nd Parliament.
  • Prior to his election, Mr. Drouin worked as a special assistant in the Office of the Ontario Premier.
Interest in TBS Portfolio
  • 43rd Parliament
    • Committee (OGGO):
      • The Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic:
        • Interested in government supports established during the pandemic (CERB, CEWS, medical research, PPE retooling and procurement, etc.) and on the public service’s adaptation to a remote work environment.
        • May 8, 2020 (TBS President, CHRO and CIO Appearance): Asked questions surrounding the well-being of public servants and mental health solutions. Was also concerned about the issue of official languages not being enforced in the workplace.
      • Estimates (Supply):
        • March 12, 2020 (MDG Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Questions on the consolidation of the services and organizations under Digital Government. Expressed interest in the concept of open government.
        • February 27, 2020 (TBS Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Asked the President and TBS officials about Estimates reform and the lessons learned from the pilot project in the 42nd Parliament.
      • Red Tape Reduction Act
        • March 10, 2020 (TBS and HC Appearance): Requested the impact of moving to a different offset rule (two-for-one for example), the TBS witness explained that a net reduction to the financial and administrative costs to businesses. Analytically, the jury is out on the effectiveness of a two-for-one rule; it depends on the circumstances and objectives, but those could be less sustainable over time. Mr. Drouin also questioned the cumulative impact of multi-jurisdictional regulation which the TBS witness admitted would be a complex issue to consider.

2nd Vice-Chair: Julie Vignola (Québec–Beauport–Limoilou) – Bloc Québécois member

Julie Vignola (Beauport–Limoilou)
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Beauport–Limoilou in 2019.
  • BQ Critic for Public Services and Procurement and government operations.
  • Former high school teacher and vice-principal.
  • Interested in and involved with various community well-being organizations: ex: Lions Club, Canada World Youth
  • Advocate for Quebec’s independence.
Interest in TBS Portfolio
  • In the 43rd Parliament:
    • Question Period: Issues with the Phoenix pay system and RCMP civilian employees being transitioned to the Phoenix pay system.
    • Committee (OGGO):
      • The Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic:
        • Interested in Federal-Provincial-Territorial relations and the cost of various aspects of the pandemic (general government supports, public servant leave and remote work, broad economic impacts).
        • May 25, 2020 (Cyber Security): Was concerned about the risks and threats to Government networks and the fraudulent websites targeting Canadians regarding the Emergency COVID-19 benefits.
        • May 8, 2020 (Unions): Had questions concerning ergonomic assessments and the impact of public servants working from home.
        • May 8, 2020 (TBS President, CHRO and CIO Appearance): Had concerns surrounding the cost of public servants working from home and how they were being accommodated.
      • Estimates (Supply):
        • March 12, 2020 (MDG Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Requested details on the consolidation of data centres, questioned the reason funding was sought for essential projects in the Supplementary Estimates instead of the Main Estimates. Requested information on the progress of identifying the health of IT systems and platforms (follow-up)
        • February 27, 2020 (TBS Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Expressed interest in the allocation of loans and grants for students in Quebec (follow-up) and had questions concerning the Quebec transfer process for health care (follow-up) Raised concerns about the concentration of funds from Vote 10.
      • Review of the Red Tape Reduction Act (RTRA):
        • March 10, 2020 (TBS and HC Officials – First Meeting): Questioned officials on how the Government is proactively working to reduce regulatory burden for businesses. Requested additional information on the cost of administering the RTRA and the one-for-one rule and expressed privacy concerns on harmonizing the multi-jurisdictional regulation.

Steven MacKinnon (Quebec–Gatineau) – Liberal member, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Services and Procurement

Steven MacKinnon (Gatineau)
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Gatineau in 2015.
  • Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Services and Procurement.
  • Previously a non-voting Member of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts and the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates.
  • Previously a Member of the Standing Committee on Finance.
  • Prior to his election, Mr. MacKinnon was a senior vice president at a global consultancy firm.
  • Mr. MacKinnon served as an advisor to former Prime Minister Paul Martin and former New Brunswick Premier Frank McKenna.

Dane Lloyd (Alberta–Sturgeon River–Parkland): Conservative member

Dane Lloyd (Alberta–Sturgeon River–Parkland)
  • First elected in a 2017 by-election and re-elected in the 2019 general election for the riding of Sturgeon River–Parkland
  • Conservative Critic for Digital Government
  • Holds a commission as an infantry officer in the Canadian Armed Forces Reserves
  • Former staff member to Conservative MPs Michael Cooper and Ed Fast (while Minister of International Trade), and to former Conservative MP Jason Kenney (while Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
  • Served as a member of the Standing Committees on Veterans Affairs (43rd Parliament, 1st session) and on Industry, Science and Technology (42nd Parliament)
Interest in TBS Portfolio
  • 43rd Parliament:
    • Written Questions: Topics included firearms regulations and prohibitions
    • Question Period (including at COVI)
      • Interested in the energy and forestry industries in western Canada
    • Committee (ACVA)
      • Advocate for mental health and family support programs
    • Committee (ETHI)
      • Attended one meeting as an alternate during the Committee’s study of the Canada Student Service Grant
      • He expressed support for pursuing the Committee’s inquiry on the matter and for inviting the Prime Minister to testify
  • 42nd Parliament
    • Written Questions: Topics included expenditures on bots, algorithms
    • House debates
      • Interested in the energy and forestry industries in western Canada, opposed the Government’s plan to tax carbon and oil tanker moratorium
    • Committee (INDU)
      • Concerned about Huawei’s potential participation in Canada’s 5G network
      • Interested in Canada’s Digital Charter and data protection, as well as connectivity to remote communities
      • Participated in the Committee’s study on the impacts of regulation on small business, supports minimal regulation

Pierre Paul-Hus (Québec–Charlesbourg–Haute-Saint-Charles): Conservative member

Pierre Paul-Hus (Québec–Charlesbourg–Haute-Saint-Charles)
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Charlesbourg–Haute-Saint-Charles in 2015.
  • Official Opposition Critic for Public Services and Procurement
  • Role as the lead editor for the PRESTIGE Media Group giving him experience with business, political and cultural sectors in Quebec City.
  • Previously served as the Official Opposition Critic for Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness
  • Served as Vice Chair of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU) in the 43-1 and the 42nd Parliament.
  • Also a current Member of the Canada-China Relations Committee (CACN)
Interest in TBS Portfolio
  • In the 43rd Parliament:
    • Written Questions: Topic regarding the air quality in government buildings, RCMP Officers and warrants issued pursuant to CSIS and deaths in correctional institutions
    • Question Period: Questioned the procurement process for COVID-19 rapid testing

Kelly McCauley (Alberta–Edmonton West): Conservative member

Kelly McCauley (Alberta–Edmonton West)
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Edmonton West in the 2015.
  • Previously served on the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates.
  • Served on the Executive Committee of the Board of Northlads, the Board of Alberta Aviation Museum.
  • Chairperson of the EI Board of Referees for Edmonton and Northern Alberta.
  • Hospitality professional (managing hotels and convention centres).
Interest in TBS Portfolio
  • In the 43rd Parliament:
    • Special COVI committee: Asked questions on PPE Procurement (April 29, 2020)
    • In the House of Commons: On February 7, 2020, during debate referenced OGGO’s 2017 report on the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act and noted that he hopes the new President of the Treasury Board returns to committee to discuss the file.
    • Committee (OGGO):
      • The Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic:
        • Interested in (and critical of) Government transparency and accountability, general due diligence and respect of financial controls regarding government spending, the use of leave code 699 by public service employees
        • May 25, 2020 (Cyber Security): Pressed M. Brouillard on comments made by his predecessor at the May 8, 2020, OGGO appearance. Mr. McCauley expressed concern about monitoring of compliance with TBS-issued guidelines and directives on proper and secure information management and access to information in the context of remote work. Pressed CSE on the Government’s ongoing review of Huawei and Canada’s 5G telecommunications network. Questions focused on potential risks posed by Huawei hardware, and the manner in which the Government of Canada’s standing with its Five Eyes allies could be impacted by an eventual decision.
        • May 8, 2020 (Unions): Asked the union representatives what they would expect to see to have their members return to work.
        • May 8, 2020 (TBS President, CHRO and CIO Appearance): Expressed concern about the ability and guidance surrounding the security of documents with public servants working from home. Also had questions about how many public servants were on leave during the pandemic (follow-up). He questioned the cost of the public service internet subscription (follow-up) and the Government’s response to the Information Commissioner’s concern over Access to Information requests not being addressed quickly (follow-up).
        • May 4, 2020 (EMS and Finance Canada Appearance): Asked questions about the Government’s intention of using Special Warrants and the process. He also showed concern regarding Treasury Board approval and oversight processes.
      • Estimates (Supply):
        • February 27, 2020 (TBS Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Expressed concern about the use of Vote 10 and the increasing amounts being allocated to it. Describing it as the new “slush fund,” he questioned officials on parliamentary oversight.
      • Review of the Red Tape Reduction Act
        • March 10, 2020: (TBS and HC Appearance): Requested the progress in implementation of the 11 recommendations from the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology’s April 2019 report, entitled Impacts of Canada’s Regulatory Structure on Small Business: between protection and competition (follow-up). Mr. McCauley requested the cost of administering the RTRA regime, as well as whether the scope of enabling legislation is prohibitive to increasing the reduction of regulatory burden (follow-up)
  • In the 42nd Parliament:
    • Committee:
      • Veterans in the Public Service: Questioned why veterans lose seniority rights when working in the public service.
      • Bargaining: Interested in the costing for the Phoenix damages offer (5 vacation days for public servants in certain unions) – Agreements were tentative, and a response was provided later.
      • Public Service Employee Survey: Concerned about harassment numbers escalating in the public service during the PCO appearance.
      • Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act: Interested in the Government’s progress in implementing the recommendations from OGGO’s 2017 report on the act. Moved several motions inviting former Treasury Board Presidents to appear on the subject; the invitations were not accepted.
    • Written Questions: Topics included travel expenses for departmental employees, allocations from TBS for Vote 40, and Government ads on Facebook.

Matthew Green (Ontario–Hamilton Centre): New Democratic Party member

Matthew Green (Ontario – Hamilton Centre)
  • First elected in the 2019 federal election in the riding of Hamilton Centre (formerly held by NDP MP David Christopherson).
  • NDP Critic for Treasury Board, National Revenue, Public Services and Procurement, and Deputy Critic for Ethics.
  • Former Councillor for the City of Hamilton (2014 to 2018).
  • Member of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP).
  • Member of the Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association (CAAF) and the Canadian Section of ParlAmericas (CPAM).
Interest in TBS Portfolio
  • In the 43rd Parliament:
    • February 20, 2020: Estimates Process briefing with the department (EMS).
    • February 18, 2020: TBS 101 briefing with department (PP).
    • Question Period: Outsourcing of government contracts and dismissal of a public servant for comments made about the Prime Minister.
    • Written Questions: Topics included social media influencers, management consulting contracts.
    • Committee (OGGO):
      • The Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic:
        • Interested in the management of the National Emergency Strategic Stockpile, access to information and Cabinet Confidences, supports for marginalized populations, the accessibility of emergency economic supports (and their impact on the work of constituency offices)
        • May 25, 2020 (Cyber Security): Had questions concerning CRA or Service Canada dropped calls and the improvements being made to address this issue. 
        • May 8, 2020 (TBS President, CHRO and CIO Appearance): Expressed concern about the public service union contracts that were not yet renewed. Had questions surrounding the cost of the buy-back when the outstanding contracts were signed (follow-up)
        • April 24, 2020 (Minister of PSPC Appearance on procurement): requested additional information on what the Government is doing on hazard pay for government employees such as janitors. Mr. Green also had questions on the directive on the disposal of surplus materials.
      • Estimates (Supply):
        • March 12, 2020 (MDG Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): requested the definition of “core and at-risk” IT systems and platforms and progress in undertaking their identification as described in Minister Murray’s mandate letter. The challenge of delivering services to constituents in the context of social distancing and COVID-19 (follow-up)
        • February 27, 2020 (TBS Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Questioned officials on pay equity legislation for public servants (ESDC), First Nations land claims (INAC), and employment equity (follow-up)
      • Review of the Red Tape Reduction Act (RTRA):
        • March 10, 2020 (TBS and HC Officials – First Meeting): Questioned whether consultations on regulatory burden are biased toward commercial stakeholders and wondered if there were exemptions to the one-for-one rule and engagement with new or emerging sectors. Questioned the inclusion of the one-for-one rule in the RTRA preamble, instead of in a separate section.

Majid Jowhari (Ontario–Richmond Hill): Liberal member

Majid Jowhari (Ontario–Richmond Hill)
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Richmond Hill in the 2015.
  • Previously a member of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates and the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology.
  • A member of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates and the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology.
  • Prior to his election, Jowhari was a licensed Professional Engineer from 1995-1999 and founded his own boutique consulting firm to provide advice to chief financial officers.
  • In 2018, the Canadian Alliance on Mental Illness and Mental Health (CAMIMH) named Majid Jowhari as a Parliamentary Mental Health Champion.
Interest in TBS Portfolio
  • In the 43rd Parliament:
    • Committee (OGGO):
      • The Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic:
        • Interested in government supports for businesses and industry,
      • Estimates (Supply):
        • March 12, 2020 (MDG Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Requested additional information on the Next Generation HR and Pay Solution Pilot.
        • February 27, 2020 (TBS Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Questioned officials about reconciliation efforts with Indigenous communities.
      • Review of the Red Tape Reduction Act:
        • March 10, 2020 (TBS and HC Appearance): Asked about the cumulative impact of multi-jurisdictional regulations. The TBS witness explained that it is something they consider and that there is no existing methodology for quantifying cumulative burden.

Irek Kusmierczyk (Ontario–Windsor–Tecumseh): Liberal member, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion

Irek Kusmierczyk (Ontario–Windsor–Tecumseh)
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Windsor–Tecumseh in the 2019.
  • A member of the Standing Committee on Government Operations.
  • Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion.
  • Prior to his election, Mr. Kusmierczyk was a city councillor for the Windsor City Council.
Interest in TBS Portfolio
  • In the 43rd Parliament:
    • Committee (OGGO):
      • The Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic:
        • Interested in workplace health and safety, contact tracing applications, federal and provincial PPE procurement processes
        • May 8, 2020 (Unions): Asked questions about the impact of long hours on CRA employees and congratulated CRA employees on all of their hard work.
      • Estimates (Supply):
        • March 12, 2020 (MDG Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Requested additional information on SSC’s Accessibility, Accommodation, and Adaptive Computer Technology (AAACT) program.
        • February 27, 2020 (TBS Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Questioned officials about the reduction of Green House Gas Emissions and unrecoverable debts for student loans.
      • Review of the Red Tape Reduction Act
        • March 10, 2020 (TBS and HC Appearance): Questioned the effectiveness of such rules as two-for-one over time, the TBS and Health Canada witnesses explained that it is a delicate balancing act and there is no methodology to study this. Mr. Kusmierczyk requested information regarding the stakeholder-suggested improvements to the red tape reduction regime, which the TBS witness acknowledged will be released in a report in a few weeks’ time

Patrick Weiler (Ontario–West Vancouver–Sunshine Coast–Sea to Sky Country): Liberal member

Patrick Weiler (Ontario–West Vancouver–Sunshine Coast–Sea to Sky Country)
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of West Vancouver–Sunshine Coast–Sea to Sky Country in 2019.
  • Member of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources.
  • Environmental and natural resource management lawyer.
  • Represented First Nations, municipalities, small businesses and non-profits on environmental and corporate legal matters within this riding.
  • He is a champion of the Liberal government’s Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change.
Interest in TBS Portfolio
  • In the 43rd Parliament:
    • Committee (OGGO):
      • The Government’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic:
        • Interested in government supports for businesses and industry, PPE procurement, management of the economy
      • Estimates (Supply):
        • February 27, 2020 (TBS Supplementary Estimates B 19–20 Appearance): Wanted to know about transportation funding and projects for the West coast following the loss of greyhound (follow-up).

3. Overview of the Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21

In this section

Issue

What planned spending is presented in Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21?

Key facts

  • Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21 present a total of $79.2 billion in incremental budgetary spending, including $20.9 billion to be voted by parliament and $58.3 billion in forecast statutory expenditures.
  • Of these amounts, roughly $15 billion (74%) of the voted requirements and $57 billion (96%) of the additional statutory forecasts are for the Government’s response to the public health, social and economic impact on Canadians of the COVID-19 global pandemic.
  • These Estimates also present $1.3 billion in loans, investment and advances.

Response

  • The Government continues to invest in Canadians and the economy, and particularly in the efforts to respond to the public health threats of the COVID-19 virus and to minimize its health, economic and social impacts.
  • The Supplementary Estimates outline new, and updated, spending needs for programs and services that were not sufficiently developed in time for inclusion in the Main Estimates.

Background

  • The majority of the $20.9 billion in new voted spending is for:
    • emergency responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, including medical research, vaccine development and purchases of personal protective gear and medical equipment and supplies; and
    • economic responses to the pandemic, including support for small and medium-sized businesses, salary top-ups for essential workers, and funding for provinces and territories to safely restart their economies, bring students back to school, and clean up inactive oil and gas wells.
  • The $58.3 billion in planned statutory spending reflects the Government’s key response measures and emergency supports, including:
    • the Canada Emergency Response Benefit ($28.5 billion);
    • payments to provinces and territories for the Safe Restart Agreement ($12.3 billion);
    • medical research and vaccine development ($3.8 billion); and
    • acquisition of protective gear and medical equipment ($3.3 billion).
  • These Supplementary Estimates (B) also include $1.3 billion in non-budgetary measures, related primarily to student loans.

4. Overview of the 2020–21 Main Estimates

In this section

Issue

What spending is being presented to Parliament for its approval in the 2020–21 Main Estimates?

Key facts

  • The 2020–21 Main Estimates present total budgetary expenditures of $304.6 billion:
    • $125.1 billion of budgetary voted expenditures
    • $179.5 billion of statutory budgetary expenditures
  • The 2020–21 Main Estimates also include information on roughly $3.1 billion of non-budgetary expenditures (loans, investments and advances):
    • $87.2 million of non-budgetary voted expenditures
    • $3.0 billion of statutory non-budgetary expenditures

Response

  • The Government’s Main Estimates for 2020–21 outline $304.6 billion in total budgetary spending authorities.
  • Responsible government spending creates opportunities for Canadians from coast to coast to coast.
  • These investments will provide services to Indigenous peoples, and international development and peace programming, and ensure the continued effectiveness of the Canadian Armed Forces.

Background

The 2020–21 Main Estimates present $125.1 billion of budgetary voted expenditures and $87.2 million in non-budgetary voted expenditures.

The 2020–21 Main Estimates also include information on $179.5 billion of statutory budgetary spending and $3.0 billion of statutory non-budgetary expenditures (loans, investments and advances).

The level of voted budgetary spending is slightly ($0.5 billion) lower than what was presented in the 2019–20 Main Estimates.

Voted spending will be authorized through three appropriation bills. The first, Interim Supply, was introduced in Parliament in March for spending until the end of June 2020; the second, additional Interim Supply; was introduced in June for spending until the end of December; and a third, Full Supply, will be introduced in December for the balance of funding presented in the Main Estimates.

Of the 122 organizations presenting funding requirements, six are seeking more than $5 billion of voted budgetary funding.

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21: government-wide / major items

5. COVID-19: Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, Public Service and Procurement Canada

In this section

Issue

What are the major voted expenditures related to COVID-19 health and medical measures in Supplementary Estimates (B) 2020–21?

Key facts

  • The Public Health Agency of Canada is spearheading health and medical measures to combat COVID-19. There is $9.3 billion in voted funding related to COVID for the Agency in Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21. This is over 40% of the total amount of these supplementary estimates to be approved by Parliament.
  • Health Canada ($747 million) and Public Services and Procurement Canada ($400 million) also present significant amounts of voted funding in these Estimates for health and medical measures.

Response

  • Planned spending in these Estimates supports the Government’s response to the public health, social and economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Canadians.
  • This planned spending includes medical research, vaccine development and supplies of key goods and services, such as personal protective equipment, to invest in the health and safety of all Canadians.
  • Our government has a responsibility to ensure Canadians have the support they need in this time of crisis, and to promote safety and prosperity going forward.

Background

  • The Public Health Agency of Canada is requesting:
    • $5.4 billion for medical research and vaccine developments, including advanced vaccine purchase agreements;
    • $2.2 billion to purchase personal protective equipment, laboratory testing kits, medical supplies and equipment for use in the health-care sector and in federal government departments and agencies;
    • $783 million to help secure and enhance domestic biomanufacturing capacity, obtain a sufficient supply of packaging materials for the COVID-19 vaccine; secure mass vaccination equipment; and build capacity for successful vaccine deployment;
    • $320 million for testing, contact tracing and data management; and
    • $230 million for border and travel measures and isolation sites.
  • Health Canada is requesting:
    • $319 million for medical research; and
    • $315 million for testing, contact tracing and data management.
  • Public Services and Procurement Canada is requesting:
    • $400 million to acquire and distribute supplies of key goods and services, such as medical equipment, including personal protective equipment for a broad range of organizations which are involved in COVID-19 response or which provide non-medical essential services to Canadians.

6. COVID-19 funding: Department of Finance

In this section

Issue

What are the major voted COVID-19 expenditures for the Department of Finance in Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21?

Key facts

  • The Department of Finance is requesting roughly $3.3 billion in these Estimates, of which over 95% is COVID-19 related.
  • The funds requested are for salary top-ups for essential workers, and funding for provinces and territories to safely restart their economies, bring students back to school, and clean up inactive oil and gas wells.

Response

  • Our Government has a responsibility to ensure Canadians have the support they need in this time of crisis, and to promote economic recovery and prosperity going forward.
  • Funding in these Estimates will help provinces and territories increase their capacity to conduct COVD-19 testing, perform contact tracing, and share public health data that will help fight the pandemic
  • Investments for the provinces also include $1 billion for Alberta to clean up inactive oil and gas wells, which will help the environment while further promoting economic recovery.

Background

  • The Department of Finance is requesting:
    • $1 billion for the Safe Return to Class Fund, payments to provinces and territories to help cover costs of adapting the education sector to ensure a safe return to class throughout the school year. Expenditures supported by the Fund include adapted learning spaces, improved air ventilation, increased hand sanitation and hygiene, and purchases of personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies;
    • $1 billion for the Province of Alberta to clean up inactive oil and gas wells, which will help the environment while promoting economic recovery;
    • $700 million for the Safe Restart Agreement which supports provinces and territories in safely restarting their economies and preparing for possible future waves of the virus. Funding in these Estimates will help provinces and territories increase their capacity to conduct testing, perform contact tracing, and share public health data that will help fight the pandemic;
    • $461 million for the Essential Workers Support Fund (COVID-19), to cost-share, with provinces and territories, a temporary top-up to the salaries of workers deemed essential in the fight against COVID-19.

7. COVID-19 funding: Department of Indigenous Services Canada

In this section

Issue

What are the voted COVID-19 expenditures in Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21 to support Indigenous communities?

Key facts

  • The Department of Indigenous Services is requesting approximately $330 million in these Estimates, for COVID-19 related activities.
  • The funds requested will be used to support Indigenous businesses, students and youth, and employment services.

Response

  • The government is committed to supporting Indigenous communities and businesses to meet their specific challenges related to the pandemic.
  • The funds requested will be used to help ensure Indigenous businesses have the resources to address their immediate needs and reduce the impact of the pandemic.
  • These estimates also have planned investments to support the safe restart of indigenous communities, and further funding for students and youth.

Background

  • The Department of Indigenous Services is requesting:
    • $298.3 million to address the specific needs of Indigenous businesses impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and to mitigate the impact on their short-term operational requirements. The funding will be delivered through a mix of repayable and non-repayable contributions;
    • $15.9 million to support students and youth;
    • $8.1 million to support a safe restart in Indigenous communities; and
    • $7.2 million to provide case management and pre-employment services to individuals who receive support through the On-Reserve Income Assistance Program.

8. COVID-19 funding: other organizations

In this section

Issue

How do the voted expenditures in Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21 address many of the challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic?

Key facts

  • Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21 presents voted funding requirements for a wide variety of responses to the impacts of the pandemic.
  • This funding:
    • Supports the Canadian Armed Forces’ response to the pandemic;
    • Addresses urgent housing needs and food insecurity;
    • Provides both broad and industry-specific support for businesses;
    • Creates job opportunities for students; and
    • Sustains government operations.

Response

  • The Government is committed to helping Canadians face the wide variety of challenges brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Planned funding in these estimates includes support for urgent housing needs for vulnerable Canadians as well as funding for small and medium-sized businesses.
  • Planned funding for the Canadian Armed Forces and for IT infrastructure to improve remote access and online collaboration tools, will further support the Government’s pandemic response.

Background

  • Notable instances of voted funding for COVID-19 response include:
    • $256 million to support the Canadian Armed Forces’ response to COVID-19 (Department of National Defence);
    • $254 million to help address urgent housing needs of vulnerable Canadians by rapidly creating new affordable housing units (Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation);
    • $228 million to support small and medium-sized businesses (regional development agencies);
    • $125 million to support research institutes and universities (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council);
    • $91.0 million to provide information technology infrastructure and services for online program delivery and support increased demand for secure remote network access and online collaboration tools for employees (Shared Services Canada);
    • $74 million to sustain Parks Canada operations;
    • $59 million for research into medical countermeasures and support for businesses to increase countermeasure production capacity (Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Department of Industry, National Research Council of Canada);
    • $50 million for the Food Infrastructure Fund which facilitates access to safe and nutritious food for at-risk populations (Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food);
    • $50 million to increase bio-manufacturing capacity (National Research Council of Canada)
    • $48 million to create job opportunities for students (Department of Industry and National Research Council of Canada);
    • $44 million for the Community Futures Network (regional development agencies);
    • $37 million to address the outbreak of COVID-19 among temporary foreign workers on farms (Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Department of Employment and Social Development);
    • $24 million for the Canadian Seafood Stabilization Fund (regional development agencies);
    • $15 million for the Women Entrepreneurship Strategy Ecosystem Fund (regional development agencies).

9. Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act and other COVID-19 statutory authorities

In this section

Issue

Recent legislation provided spending authority for activities related to the pandemic. What new statutory expenditures are included in Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21?

Key facts

  • COVID-19 response measures have been addressed through a mix of voted and statutory authorities.
  • In general, statutory measures focus on direct support for individuals and businesses, or large-scale expenditures needed in the immediate term.
  • The Government has approved several statutory measures since the beginning of the pandemic, the most recent being the COVID-19 Response Measures Act, granted Royal Assent on October 2, which modified the Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act (PHENCPA), to provide spending authority up to December 31, 2020.
  • Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21 presents for information, $58.3 billion in statutory expenditures, including:
    • the Canada Emergency Response Benefit ($28.5 billion);
    • payments to provinces and territories for the Safe Restart Agreement ($12.3 billion);
    • medical research and vaccine development ($3.8 billion); and
    • acquisition of protective gear and medical equipment ($3.3 billion).

Response

  • The Government is committed to ensuring that programs related to health and safety have the necessary resources for Canadians during this pandemic.
  • All statutory expenditures presented in these supplementary estimates are already authorized through existing legislation.
  • Statutory expenditures, such as the $28.5 billion for the Canada Emergency Response Benefit and $12.3 billion to provinces for the Safe Restart Agreement are presented for information only in order to provide a more complete view of the Government’s spending plan.
  • The supplementary estimates do not seek authority to fund the Canada Emergency Response Benefit
  • The Government has also included planned spending to Canadians across the country, through funding to provinces for the Safe Restart Agreement.

Background

The PHENCPA provides a payment authority for many of the Government’s key emergency supports, such as the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB), the Canada Emergency Student Benefit (CESB) and the Canada Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance program.

PHENCPA also provides authority for economic recovery programs and government operations to respond to the pandemic.

Following repeal of the original PHENCPA on September 30, the COVID-19 Response Measures Act was granted Royal Assent on October 2, modifying the Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act (PHENCPA), to provide spending authority for named initiatives with spending limits, up to December 31, 2020.

Anticipated expenditures from January 1 to March 31 are included in these Estimates to be voted on by Parliament.

Temporary amendments to the Financial Administration Act authorized for payments to provinces and territories, were also repealed on September 30.

10. Specific claims settlement: CIRNA

In this section

Issue

Is there funding in Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21 to settle claims with First Nations?

Key facts

  • These Supplementary Estimates include $760 million for anticipated settlements of specific claims.
    • This is a reprofile of unused funds from the previous fiscal year. Timing of payments is determined by conclusion of successful negotiations and ratification of settlements.
    • Concluding these agreements provides financial benefits to the First Nations, as well as closure and certainty for both the First Nations and the Crown.

Response

  • The Government is committed to comprehensive land claim negotiations to give Indigenous Peoples the support they need for their communities to succeed.
  • Funding plans in these Supplementary Estimates support timely payment of anticipated settlements of specific land claims.
  • They respond to the unique land ownership, use and protection needs of Indigenous leadership, while also renewing the government-to-government relationship between Canada and Indigenous Peoples.

Background

Specific claims are grievances arising from alleged failures of the Crown to fulfill its lawful obligations, usually in the context of managing the lands and assets of First Nations under the Indian Act or protecting First Nation interests in treaty implementation.

The primary objective of the Specific Claims Policy is to discharge outstanding lawful obligations of the federal government through negotiated settlement agreements.

As of June 2020, there were 131 claims under assessment and 338 in negotiations.

11. Transport initiatives

In this section

Issue

What are the proposed funding amounts for the Department of Transport in these supplementary estimates and what are they intended to achieve?

Key facts

  • As part of these Estimates, Transport Canada is seeking $516.6 million in voted budgetary spending, which represents a 29% increase over previously approved authorities. Major initiatives include:
    • $180 million for the purchase of the MV Villa de Teror;
    • $115.8 million to provide essential air services to remote communities;
    • $69.5 million to renew the Ports Asset Transfer Program; and
    • $54.2 million for the incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles Program.

Response

  • While the vast majority of planned spending in these estimates is earmarked for COVID-19 initiatives, the Government continues to advance its other priorities for Canadians.
  • Planned investments outlined in these estimates include, for example, bilateral agreements with provinces and territories to provide essential air services to remote communities and upgrades to transportation services to improve access to the Îles-de-la-Madeleine.
  • The government also continues to invest in greening government operations, including additional funding for the Zero-Emission Vehicles program announced in Budget 2019 to provide for point-of sale rebates on purchases of Zero-Emission Vehicles to offset their higher purchase price.

Background

  • These Supplementary Estimates include $516.6 million for the Department of Transport:
    • $180 million for the purchase of the MV Villa de Teror, a ferry to replace the 39-year-old MV Madeleine which is the only regular year-round means of transportation for vehicle and passenger traffic on and off the Îles-de-la-Madeleine;
    • $115.8 million to establish new bilateral agreements with provinces and territories to provide essential air services to remote communities that rely on air service as the only year-round mode of transportation;
    • $69.5 million to renew the Ports Asset Transfer Program in order to reduce the inventory of local ports held by Transport Canada while also ensuring the safe operation of its existing port facilities; and
    • $54.2 million for the incentive for Zero-Emission Vehicles program announced in Budget 2019 to provide for point-of sale rebates on purchases of Zero-Emission Vehicles to offset their higher purchase price. This program has received significant uptake with projections indicating that Budget 2019 funding will be exhausted later this year, more than one year earlier than originally forecast.

12. Government advertising

In this section

Issue

Why is there funding in Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21 for government advertising?

Key facts

  • Federal government advertising helps inform Canadians about their rights, government programs and services, as well as risks to public health, safety and the environment.
  • As per our annual government advertising process, these Estimates include $22.6 million for non-COVID-related advertising campaigns in nine departments, covering a range of topics from raising awareness of fraudulent scams; generating engagement in nature conservation issues; and increasing preparedness and readiness of Canadians for disasters and emergencies.
  • The Privy Council Office received $48.7 million in Supplementary Estimates (A) to support COVID-19 response focused government advertising. This funding request reflected the urgent nature of the need for public communications on public health guidance and economic support for Canadians. It allowed PCO to respond quickly to urgent requirements by supporting departments engaged in the government response to the pandemic including the approval and funding of selected COVID-19 response advertising campaigns.
  • The Privy Council Office is now seeking to transfer $33.9 million of its $48.7 million to other organizations such as the Department of Finance and the Public Health Agency of Canada, for COVID-19 public health guidance and economic support for Canadians.
  • It is common practice for transfers to occur between departments as plans are implemented and programs are delivered.

Response

  • Advertising helps the Government communicate directly with Canadians on government policies, priorities, programs and services so Canadians can make informed choices.
  • These Estimates include planned spending for advertising that covers a range of topics from raising awareness of fraudulent scams; generating engagement in nature conservation issues; and increasing preparedness and readiness of Canadians for disasters and emergencies.
  • Planned funding also supports campaigns on taking action against violence, harassment and promoting mental health in the workplace.
  • Of significance, the Government will also direct its advertising efforts to the ongoing pandemic response, promoting awareness and encouraging action on important programs and measures.

Background

  • The non-COVID-19 response advertising campaigns supported by the $22.6 million of new funding are:
    • “Taking Action Against Violence, Harassment and Mental Health in the Workplace” emphasizes the ongoing importance of addressing mental health, violence and harassment in the Canadian workforce.
    • “Benefits and Credits” will raise awareness amongst vulnerable populations and working Canadians of benefits and credits that they are entitled to when they file their taxes.
    • “Slam the Scam” will raise awareness of a variety of scams to reduce the public’s susceptibility to them.
    • “Services for Seniors” will promote programs and benefits for older Canadians.
    • “Inclusive Workplace” supports accessibility in the workplace for persons with disabilities.
    • “Nature Legacy” will generate awareness and engagement in key nature conservation issues.
    • “Newcomer Services and Inclusive Communities” promotes programs and services (language and skills courses, labour market access, welcoming communities, etc.) offered by the government to help newcomers integrate and succeed in Canada.
    • “Jordan's Principle / Inuit Child First Initiative” will raise awareness about these programs, including information on eligibility criteria and the products, services and supports provided.
    • “Seasonal Flu Vaccination” will help maximize flu vaccine uptake and reduce pressure on the health-care system in the event of a second wave of COVID-19 illness during flu season.
    • “Childhood Vaccination” will reinforce messaging on vaccine importance, effectiveness and safety.
    • “Emergency Preparedness (natural disasters)” will seek to educate and inform a broad swath of Canadians about the risks they could potentially face in their region.
    • “Firearms” will raise awareness of the ban and buy-back program for prohibited firearms, as well as secure storage requirements.
    • “Remembrance” honours Canadians who served our country during times of war, military conflict and peace.
    • “Mental Health Services for Veterans and Their Families” will highlight the services and supports available based on individual needs.
  • In Supplementary Estimates (A), the Department of Finance included $10 million of planned statutory (Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act) spending for advertising and PCO received $48.7 million of voted funds for “communications and marketing.” PCO is now transferring $33.9 million of funding received in Supplementary Estimates (A) to other organizations for COVID-19 related advertising campaigns:
    • $12 million for the COVID-19 Economic Response Plan (Finance)
    • $10 million for COVID public education (PHAC)
    • $10 million for the COVID Alert App (Health)
    • $1 million for travel and border information (GAC)
    • $900,000 for Essential Services Jobs/Job Bank (ESDC)
  • The funding for COVID-19 related advertising campaigns was requested through Supplementary Estimates (A) in recognition that we were dealing with an unprecedented pandemic situation and the timing for the required advertising response was uncertain and may have been needed before Supplementary Estimates (B).
  • The Annual Report on Government of Canada Advertising Activities includes information on total advertising expenditures, media mix, advertising suppliers and contracts.

Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21: TBS perspective

13. TBS Vote 1, Treasury Board Secretariat Program Expenditures

In this section

Issue

How much is TBS seeking in the 2020–21 Supplementary Estimates (B) for its Vote 1, Program expenditures?

Key facts

  • Seeking parliamentary approval for a $21.1-million increase in Vote 1, Program expenditures.

Response

  • We continue to provide leadership, guidance and oversight in people management in the Government of Canada through Phoenix stabilization and HR-to-Pay initiatives with a requested $19 million in funding.
  • Other funding requested in these Supplementary Estimates will also help to meet the government’s obligations and needs, namely updates to software and digital upgrades, claims settlements, and a study on salaries of employees under the Law Practitioner group.
  • The $21.1-million increase in Vote 1 Program expenditures, also reflects funds transferred to departments for projects to reduce GHG emissions under the Greening Government Fund.

Background

TBS will be seeking parliamentary approval to increase its Vote 1, Program expenditures authorities in 2020–21 by $21.1 million for the following:

  • $19 million for Phoenix stabilization and HR-to-Pay initiatives to provide horizontal leadership, guidance and oversight for people management infrastructure.
  • $2.9 million transfers from various organizations to continue the development of the Government of Canada Financial and Materiel Management (GCfm) Solution project. This funding will be used to transition organizations currently on the FreeBalance system, which is at risk as the vendor will no longer provide support.
  • $2.8 million to settle claims arising from the White class action settlement agreement. This funding is necessary to meet the government’s obligations under the court-ordered settlement and to ensure that settlement payments are not interrupted.
  • $0.8 million transfer from Shared Services Canada to Treasury Board Secretariat to support the Financial Management Transformation Coordinated Model and advance the development of the Government of Canada Digital Core Template.
  • $0.4 million to complete a wage study on salaries of employees under the Law Practitioner group. During the negotiations on the Law Practitioner (LP) group collective agreement and in the subsequent ratification of the agreement, the government committed to undertake a wage study.
  • -$1.8 million transfers to various organizations for innovative approaches to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in government operations. The Greening Government Fund provides opportunities for departments to explore innovative approaches to reducing GHG emissions. The Fund will contribute $1.8 million to 13 different projects in 9 Government of Canada departments and agencies.
  • -$3 million internal reallocation of resources, represents a decrease of $3 million in Vote 1, Program expenditures and an increase of $3 million in Vote 20, Public Service Insurance to increase transparency and coherence in the administration of the public service group insurance plans and programs within the Vote 20, Public Service Insurance.

14. TB Vote 10: Government-wide Initiatives

In this section

Issue

Why is the Treasury Board Secretariat requesting an additional $20 million in its Government-wide Initiatives Vote for the Application Modernization Initiative?

Key facts

  • Funding for the Application Modernization Initiative will support departments and agencies as they migrate their IT applications from aging data centres into more secure modern data centres or cloud services.
  • TBS Vote 10, Government-wide Initiatives, is the centrally managed vote that supports strategic management initiatives in the federal public service, including the Application Modernization Initiative since 2018–19.
  • TBS Vote 10 is an appropriate vehicle for allocations that are subject to a review process, and subsequent approval of a delegated official, in this case the Government of Canada Chief Information Officer.

Response

  • TBS Vote 10, Government-wide Initiatives, is a centrally managed vote that supports the implementation of strategic management initiatives that cut across many departments.
  • The Application Modernization Initiative started with funding in Budget 2018. These current investments ensure we can enhance key government Information technology and information management capabilities, such as upgrading data centres and moving to the cloud where feasible.
  • These ongoing upgrades help ensure the Government is always modernizing its key IT infrastructure and improving resilience.

Background

Budget 2018 earmarked $110 million for the Application Modernization Initiative to move IT applications from data centres at highest risk of failure to a modern hosting solution (for example, the Cloud or a new data centre).

An initial $44 million was accessed by the Treasury Board Secretariat in February 2019. Funding allocated during this initial phase was used by departments to take stock of their IT applications and identify activities required in preparation for a move to the cloud or a modern data centre.

The $20 million in Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21 will be used to continue implementation of the initiative.

The Treasury Board Secretariat, in collaboration with Shared Services Canada, prioritizes allocations based on the risk level of the aging data centre in which departments’ IT applications are housed and their readiness to implement upgrades.

Allocations are authorized by the Government of Canada Chief Information Officer and distributed to organizations through TBS Vote 10.

TBS Vote 10, Government-wide Initiatives, is a Treasury Board managed central vote that supports strategic management initiatives in the federal public service.

In general, items included in TBS Vote 10 still have some stage of development or approval to go through in order to ensure the funds are distributed effectively. In all cases, parliament has been fully informed on the funds through its upfront inclusion in the Estimates and then through reporting of drawdowns with each Estimates and at year-end.

15. TB Vote 15: compensation adjustments

In this section

Issue

Why is the Treasury Board Secretariat requesting $19 million for compensation adjustments in the Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21?

Key facts

  • Compensation funding is requested through these Estimates for:
    • incremental costs of a recently concluded collective bargaining agreement for the Aircraft Operations group;
    • changes to the terms and conditions of employment for ten groups in separate agencies; and
    • Compensation payments to employees for the delayed implementation of recently signed collective agreements.

Response

  • The Government of Canada respects the collective bargaining process and negotiates with unions to reach agreements that are fair to employees and to taxpayers.
  • The funding in these Supplementary Estimates relates to compensation adjustments made between October 19, 2019, and September 11, 2020, based on a new collective agreement for aircraft operators and updated terms of employment for 10 other employment groups.
  • It reflects the employer’s costs of salary increases and other compensation adjustments taking effect in 2020–21.
  • Canada’s public servants deserve to be paid properly for their important work.

Background

Treasury Board Vote 15, Compensation Adjustments, is a centrally managed vote that is used to support the role of the Treasury Board as the employer of the federal government.

More specifically, it is the mechanism used to compensate appropriated organizations for salary adjustments arising from negotiated collective bargaining agreements, and other changes to the terms and conditions of employment of the public administration.

When Parliament approves the appropriation act for these Supplementary Estimates, funds will be distributed from TB Vote 15 to applicable organizations, and the details are reported in the supplemental information online.

The funding in these Supplementary Estimates relates to compensation adjustments made between October 19, 2019, and September 11, 2020. It reflects the employer’s costs of salary increases and other compensation adjustments taking effect in 2020–21, for the following:

  • A recently concluded collective agreement for the Aircraft Operations (AO) group;
  • Updated terms and conditions of employment for 10 groups in separate agencies, including students at parks Canada as well as non-executive positions at FINTRAC and CIHR; and
  • Compensation payments to employees between February 5, 2020, and August 5, 2020, for delayed implementation of recently signed collective agreements.

16. TB Vote 20: public service insurance plans and programs

In this section

Issue

Why is the Treasury Board Secretariat requesting additional funding for Public Service Insurance through Supplementary Estimates (B)?

Key facts

  • The Treasury Board Secretariat is seeking parliamentary approval for $585 million to address the employer’s share of cost increases under the Public Service Insurance plans and programs.
  • This funding will allow the government to respond to cost increases driven by price inflation and population growth, and in turn help ensure the financial sustainability of the plans.

Response

  • The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) is committed to effectively managing Canada’s professional public service.
  • Through these Supplementary Estimates, TBS is seeking $585 million for Vote 20 in order to fulfill its responsibilities and obligations under the Public Service Insurance Plan.
  • These Supplementary Estimates also include a transfer of $3 million from TBS Vote 1 to Vote 20 to increase transparency and coherence in the administration of the Public Service Insurance plans and programs.

Background

TB Vote 20, Public Service Insurance, is a Treasury Board managed central vote that is used to pay for the employer’s share of costs under the public sector benefits and insurance programs.

The public service group insurance plans and programs include health and dental care benefits, as well as disability and life insurance for approximately 1.5 million active and retired employees and their eligible dependants.

The funding requested in these Supplementary Estimates will help ensure the financial sustainability of the plans and respond to cost increases driven by price inflation and population growth.

This top-up funding will also help address financial pressures caused by the sunsetting of Budget 2018 funding for TB Vote 20 at the end of 2019–20.

The Public Service Insurance plans have been experiencing increased financial pressure due to the expanded types and increased cost of prescription drugs and related services, growth in the size of the public service and lower interest rates.

These Supplementary Estimates also include a transfer of $3 million from TBS Vote 1 to Vote 20 to increase transparency and coherence in the administration of the Public Service Insurance plans and programs.

2020–21 Main Estimates: government-wide / major items

17. Statutory expenditures

In this section

Issue

How much statutory spending is reflected in the 2020–21 Main Estimates? What does this spending include?

Key facts

  • Statutory expenditures detailed in the 2020–21 Main Estimates have increased approximately $5.4 billion from the 2019–20 Main Estimates.

Response

  • Our government is making smart investments in hard-working Canadians’ priorities as part of our plan to grow and strengthen the economy.
  • These Main Estimates outline $179.5 billion in expected statutory expenditures, which is provided on an ongoing basis through existing legislation.
  • Statutory expenditures account for delivering seniors benefits, providing climate tax credits, transfer payments to provinces and territories, and servicing Canada’s public debt.
  • As well, Parliament has already authorized amounts to boost supply in Canada’s rental housing markets and help Canadians with the costs of purchasing their first home.

Background

Estimates documents reflect planned statutory expenditures for information purposes only.

The 2020–21 main Estimates include information on $179.5 billion in budgetary statutory expenditures, including elderly benefits, transfers to provinces and territories and the cost of servicing the public debt.

This amount does not include benefits paid from the Employment Insurance Operating Account or expenditures legislated through the Income Tax Act (such as the Canada Child Benefit).

The $179.5 billion is an increase of approximately $5.4 billion from the previous Main Estimates.

Significant changes in budgetary statutory spending from 2019–20 include:

  • Increases in major transfer payments (as published in the Economic and Fiscal Update 2019), most notably elderly benefits, fiscal equalization and the Canada Health Transfer;
  • The introduction of Climate Action Incentive Payments;
  • A decrease related to the additional one-time transfer to the Gas Tax Fund in 2019–20; and
  • A decrease in interest on unmatured debt.

Statutory non-budgetary expenditures of $3.0 billion are forecasted for loans, investments and advances. This is an increase of approximately $750 million from the previous year and reflects reflect increased incentives for construction of rental housing and the First-Time Home Buyer Incentive.

18. Department of National Defence

In this section

Issue

What requirements are the Department of National Defence presenting in the 2020–21 Main Estimates?

Key facts

  • National Defence is the largest department in the federal government, and it presents voted budgetary expenditures of $21.8 billion in the 2020–21 Main Estimates.

Response

  • The Government of Canada is committed to taking care of the men and women in the Canadian Armed Force and helping them face the challenges of tomorrow.
  • Through these Main Estimates, we want to expand our capabilities and equip our land, air and sea defence teams to address the threats of the modern security environment.
  • We also want to advance Canada’s defence policy – Strong, Secure, Engaged – by investing in our naval fleet, life-saving aerial search and rescue vehicles, and armoured vehicles.

Background

National Defence is presenting voted budgetary expenditures of $21.8 billion in the 2020–21 Main Estimates. This is an increase of roughly $1.3 billion over the 2019–20 Main Estimates.

The increase is primarily in capital funding related to the Strong, Secure, Engaged defence policy for investments in major capital projects such as the Canadian Surface Combatant, Fixed Wing Search and Rescue, and the Armoured Combat Support Vehicle Fleet.

The Canadian Surface Combatant project, which is part of the National Shipbuilding Strategy, will replace both the Iroquois-class destroyers and the Halifax-class multi-role patrol frigates with a single class of ship capable of meeting multiple threats on both the open ocean and the highly complex coastal environment. The project budget estimate is between $56 billion and $60 billion. The project is currently in the design phase.

The Fixed-wing search and rescue aircraft replacement involves the procurement of 16 CC-295 aircraft equipped with advanced technology systems and opening a new training facility in Comox, British Columbia. The first aircraft arrived in Comox in September 2020. The second and third aircrafts were accepted by Canada in Spain for testing in July 2020.

The Armoured combat support vehicles project involves the procurement of 360 vehicles, which will be delivered beginning in late 2020. The last vehicles are to be received in 2025. These vehicles will support a range of operations which include domestic disaster relief and overseas peacekeeping missions.

DND’s Departmental Plan will provide additional information on planned spending and objectives for the next three fiscal years.

19. Department of Indigenous Services Canada

In this section

Issue

What requirements is the Department of Indigenous Services presenting in the 2020–21 Main Estimates?

Key facts

  • The Department of Indigenous Services presents voted budgetary expenditures of $12.7 billion in the 2020–21 Main Estimates, which is second only to National Defence.

Response

  • The Government of Canada is committed to closing the socio-economic gaps experienced by First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities.
  • Funding requested in these Main Estimates seeks to support Indigenous students at all levels and to provide greater access to early learning opportunities for Indigenous children across Canada.
  • We want to ensure First Nations students have the resources and the opportunities they need to succeed and advance First Nations control of education.

Background

The Department of Indigenous Services is presenting voted budgetary expenditures of $12.7 billion in the 2020–21 Main Estimates. This is an increase of roughly $547 million over the 2019–20 Main Estimates.

This increase in funding is primarily attributable to:

  • $483.6 million related to the transfer from the Department of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs primarily for Individuals Affairs and Lands and Economic Development programs as well as internal services;
  • $85.7 million for elementary and secondary education as well as post-secondary education programs;
  • $61.7 million to support activities related to the Indigenous Early Learning and Child Care Framework.

The increases are partially offset by other decreases.

The Departmental Plan will provide additional information on planned spending and objectives for the next three fiscal years.

20. Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development

In this section

Issue

What requirements are the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development presenting in the 2020–21 Main Estimates?

Key facts

  • The Department presents voted budgetary expenditures of $7.1 billion and non-budgetary expenditures of $60.5 million in the 2020–21 Main Estimates.

Response

  • Our government is committed to expanding Canada’s support on global issues and in international institutions.
  • Spending plans in these Main Estimates target advancing human rights, combatting climate change and diversifying Canada’s trade and investment opportunities.
  • In addition, planned international spending assistance targets the empowerment of women and girls around the world – positioning Canada at the forefront of global feminist assistance efforts.
  • We also plan to contribute to global climate action assistance, delivering urgent support to developing countries to reduce greenhouse emissions.

Background

The Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development is presenting voted budgetary expenditures of $7.1 billion in the 2020–21 Main Estimates. This is an increase of roughly $741 million over the 2019–20 Main Estimates.

This increase in funding is primarily attributable to:

  • $457 million to implement the Feminist International Assistance Agenda which targets gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls. Empowering women makes families and countries more prosperous.
  • $297 million to help developing countries address the impact of climate change. Developing countries are the most impacted by climate change and the least able to afford its consequences. Canada’s financial commitment supports:
    • initiatives that significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, in line with developing countries needs and plans
    • adaptation action, particularly for the poorest and most vulnerable, including women and girls
    • mobilizing new private sector capital for climate action in developing countries
  • $58 million for the new Export Diversification Strategy which has the goal of achieving 50% more exports by 2025.

The Departmental Plan will provide additional information on planned spending and objectives for the next three fiscal years.

21. Office of Infrastructure of Canada

In this section

Issue

What requirements is the Office of Infrastructure of Canada presenting in the 2020–21 Main Estimates?

Key facts

  • The Office presents voted budgetary expenditures of $5.7 billion in the
    2020–21 Main Estimates.

Response

  • The Government is focused on building a stronger, safer and better Canada through modern and world-class infrastructure.
  • Funding requests in these Main Estimates support upgrades and repairs to existing infrastructure, such as public transit and green infrastructure.
  • Spending plans also provide funding to other levels of government for infrastructure projects that address economic, environment and community priorities.
  • We are committed to continue working in collaboration with all levels of government and other partners to build Canada for the 21st century.

Background

The Office of Infrastructure of Canada is presenting voted budgetary expenditures of $5.7 billion in the 2020–21 Main Estimates. This is a decrease of roughly $706 million over the 2019–20 Main Estimates.

This decrease in funding is primarily related to:

  • A $1.0 billion decrease in capital funding related to the Samuel de Champlain Bridge Corridor project, which was completed in 2019;
  • The decrease is partially offset by an increase of $276 million in contribution funding requirements to make payments to fund newer program responsibilities, under the Investing in Canada Plan. The increase will also fund historical programs, including under the New Building Canada Plan.

Planned statutory expenditures also decrease, by roughly $2.2 billion. This change results primarily from a one-time top-up of the Gas Tax Fund that was made in 2019–20.

The Departmental Plan will provide additional information on planned spending and objectives for the next three fiscal years.

22. Department of Veterans Affairs

In this section

Issue

What requirements is the Department of Veterans Affairs presenting in the 2020–21 Main Estimates?

Key facts

  • The Department presents voted budgetary expenditures of $5.2 billion in the 2020–21 Main Estimates.

Response

  • Our government recognizes the sacrifices made by Canada’s Veterans and the important contributions they have made to Canada and the world.
  • Funding plans in these Main Estimates provides enhanced support and online services for Veterans and their families, including compensation for pain and suffering costs and income replacement benefits.
  • We will continue to take action to improve the health and well-being of Canada’s Veterans and provide them with the benefits and services they have earned and that they are entitled to.

Background

The Department is presenting voted budgetary expenditures of $5.2 billion in the 2020–21 Main Estimates. This is an increase of roughly $821 million over the 2019–20 Main Estimates.

This increase is primarily as a result of an increase in Veterans accessing benefits and services, most notably compensation for pain and suffering, as well as income replacement benefits.

During 2020–21, the Department of Veterans Affairs will continue to focus on: enhancing online services to streamline the way Veterans and their families receive information from the Department; engaging with Veterans, stakeholder organizations and Canadians on a wide variety of issues, such as improvements to programs, benefits and services, and commemorative outreach; and, the delivery of quality services and commemoration activities.

2020–21 Main Estimates: TBS perspective

23. TBS Vote 1: Program Expenditures

In this section

Issue

How does TBS plan to spend Vote 1, Program Expenditures in the 2020–21 Main Estimates?

Key facts

  • These Vote 1, Program Expenditure plans include $283.4 million in total voted and statutory spending

Response

  • The Treasury Board Secretariat is committed to spending oversight, administrative leadership and effectively managing Canada’s professional public service.
  • Through this Departmental Plan, TBS plans to allocate $283.4 million in total planned spending to Vote 1, Program Expenditures, which covers most day-to-day expenses, such as salaries and benefits plans.
  • The Secretariat will continue delivering meaningful results for Canadians over the coming fiscal year as we lead the government’s management agenda.

Background

TBS’s 2020–21 Departmental Plan outlines $283.4 million total planned spending for Vote 1, Program Expenditures, of which $254.1 million is voted spending and $29.3 million is statutory spending (contributions to employee benefits plans).

69.7% of the total planned spending is to deliver on the department’s programs, and the remaining balance of 30.3% is for Internal Services, to support its 4 Core Responsibilities.

  • Internal Services includes: Communications, Financial Management, Human Resources Management, Information Management, Information Technology, Legal Services, Management and Oversight Services, Material, Real Property and Acquisitions.
  • TBS employs about 1,917 people, approximately 90.5% of whom are indeterminate.

24. TBS Vote 20: Public Service Insurance

In this section

Issue

The TBS 2020–21 Main Estimates, Vote 20, Public Service Insurance show a $485.7 million net decrease.

Key facts

  • These Vote 20, Public Service Insurance, plans include $2.2 billion in total spending.
  • This is a net decrease of $485.7 million when compared to last year’s Main Estimates.

Response

  • The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) is committed to effectively managing Canada’s professional public service.
  • Through these Main Estimates, TBS is seeking $2.2 billion for Vote 20 in order to fulfill its responsibilities and obligations under the Public Service Insurance Plan to hard-working public servants.
  • Funding needs for the fiscal year have decreased from last year’s Main Estimates, mainly as a result of 2018 top-up funding for the Public Service Insurance Plan sunsetting.

Background

The net decrease of $485.7 million when compared to last year’s Main Estimates is explained as follows:

  • Sunsetting of Public Service Insurance Plan funding subject to the renewal process: $511.5 million
    • Budget 2018 announced top-up funding of $554 million in 2018–19 and $511.5 million in 2019–20 to address anticipated shortfalls and contingency requirements to fulfill TBS’s employer responsibilities, and contractual obligations under the Public Service Insurance Plan. This funding has now sunsetted and is the main reason for the total Vote 20 funding decrease.
  • The above decrease in funding is offset by an increase to the Federal Public Service Dental Plan: $13.7 million
    • Budget 2019 announced ongoing funding in Vote 20, Public Service Insurance, to implement plan amendments as a result of an arbitral decision on negotiations under the Public Service Dental Care Plan.
  • Other miscellaneous increases: $12.1 million

25. Treasury Board Central Votes

In this section

Issue

What funding is included in the 2020–21 Main Estimates for Treasury Board Central Votes?

Key facts

  • The 2020–21 Main Estimates includes roughly $3.6 billion in Treasury Board central votes (excluding public service insurance) which can later be allocated among organizations.

Response

  • Our government is committed to ensuring that accountability and transparency underpin how we use public funds.
  • The use of Treasury Board Central Votes helps the Government address pressing issues and responsibly implement needed programs and services.
  • Central Vote allocations in these Main Estimates are planned to cover possible unforeseen government-wide expenses; strategic management initiatives within the public service; and pay list requirements, including maternity and parental allowances; among other measures.

Background

To support the Treasury Board in managing the government’s financial, human and materiel resources, a number of special votes are required.

These Main Estimates include:

  • $750 million in TB Vote 5, Government Contingencies, which allows Treasury Board to provide for miscellaneous, urgent or unforeseen expenditures that are not otherwise provided for in the authorities approved through departmental votes. The same amount was presented in the 2019–20 Main Estimates.
  • $31 million in TB Vote 10, Government-Wide Initiatives, which supports strategic management initiatives of the federal public administration. The amount of this vote fluctuates from year to year. In the 2019–20 Main Estimates, roughly $327 million was included in this Vote.
  • $1.6 billion in TB Vote 25 to allow for the carry forward of unspent operating funds. The same amount was presented in the 2019–20 Main Estimates.
  • $600 million in TB Vote 30, Paylist requirements, which allocates funds to departments for maternity and parental allowances, severance pay, and other payments related to changes to the terms and conditions of employment. The same amount was presented in the 2019–20 Main Estimates.
  • $600 million in TB Vote 35 to allow for the carry forward of unspent capital funds. This is a decrease from the 2019–20 Main Estimates, which included $800 million in this Vote.

2020–21 Departmental Plans

26. Update on tabling of 2020–21 Departmental Plans

In this section

Issue

Update on tabling of 2020–21 Departmental Plans.

Key facts

  • Departmental Plans have been part of ongoing efforts to improve reporting to Parliament over the last 25 years.
  • In 2019–20, 86 organizations are seeking to achieve 1,616 results, measured by 2,759 indicators.
  • In 2016, the government created the Policy on Results, requiring all departments to set out measurable indicators.

Response

  • The Government of Canada is committed to delivering on its agenda in a manner that is open and accountable to Canadians and Parliament.
  • Departmental plans help Canadians and Parliamentarians understand how federal organizations will support the Government on achieving its agenda in the coming fiscal year – including expected outcomes and actual results achieved.
  • To continue on the path of accountability, Canadians and Parliamentarians can track the progress on the plans using GC InfoBase, an easy-to-understand tool that instantly provides results information on an ongoing basis by department.

Background

Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports have been part of ongoing efforts to improve reporting to Parliament over the last 25 years. These reports are part of the Estimates family of documents, including the Main Estimates.

Departmental Plans provide details on the department or agency’s main priorities by program, including planned expenditures, expected results and related human resource requirements.

In response to the Canadian Gender Budgeting Act, planned impacts of program expenditures on gender and diversity are reported through the Departmental Plans and the gender-based analysis plus supplemental information tables available on departments’ websites.

Departmental Plans form the baseline against which organizations track and report on their year-end performance through Departmental Results Reports. They link program performance and planned results to mandate letter commitments and government priorities. This detailed program information is also available online in GC InfoBase and on departmental websites.

In 2019–20, 86 organizations are seeking to achieve 1,616 results, measured by 2,759 indicators. Assessed performance against these indicators will be reported in fall 2020. Departmental Plans are tabled along with the Main Estimates and provides links to resource requirements in the Main Estimates.

By comparison, in the previous 2018–19 fiscal year, 87 organizations sought to achieve 1,601 results, measured by 2,755 indicators.

27. TBS 2020–21 Departmental Plan

In this section

Issue

What spending did TBS be present to Parliament in its 2020–21 Departmental Plan?

Key facts

  • Departmental Plans have been part of ongoing efforts to improve reporting to Parliament over the last 25 years.
  • TBS’s Departmental Plan includes $6 billion in total planned spending
  • 1,917 FTEs would be allocated by TBS to achieve results in the Departmental Plan

Response

  • The Treasury Board Secretariat is committed to the sound management of Canadian taxpayers’ dollars.
  • Spending plans are focused on the department’s four core responsibilities of spending oversight, administrative leadership, employer responsibilities and regulatory oversight.
  • The department’s plan for next fiscal year outlines $6 billion to fulfill its responsibilities, with the majority dedicated to achieving the Secretariat’s role as administrative leader and employer of the Government of Canada.

Background

TBS’s 2020–21 Departmental Plan presents $6.0 billion in total planned spending, which includes a total of 1,917 total full-time equivalents (FTEs)

The breakdown of these planned departmental expenditures consists of:

  • $3.6 billion and 302 FTEs to spending oversight to improve the accountability of how taxpayer dollars are spent, improve financial reporting, and carry out costing due diligences for all proposed legislation and programs.
  • $86.2 million and 500 FTEs to administrative leadership to make more government data available to Canadians, improve the government digital citizen services, better manage government assets and projects and reduce the government’s greenhouse gas emissions.
  • $2.2 billion and 430 FTEs to employer responsibilities, specifically to increase diversity in the executive levels, such as more women in senior decision-making positions, as well as completing collective bargaining started in 2018.
  • $11.1 million and 71 FTEs to regulatory oversight to continue reform efforts to improve transparency, reduce administrative burdens and harmonize regulations to keep Canadians safe and businesses more competitive.
  • $86.0 million and 614 FTEs to internal services.

Hot issues for TBS: supply cycle

28. COVID-19 supply management

In this section

Issue

How is supply being provided to government organizations to continue operations and to implement COVID-19 response measures?

Key facts

  • Parliament has approved several mechanisms to provide supply for COVID-19 emergency and economic response measures.
  • The mechanisms that support funding reported in the Estimates, in chronological order, are as follows:
    Legislation Authority Effective Date

    Bill C-13: An Act respecting certain measures in response to COVID-19

    Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act (PHENCPA)

    Provides for many of the Government’s key medical response measures and emergency supports (for example, purchases of PPE)

    Covers the period between March 25, 2020, and September 30, 2020

    Currently expired

    Bill C-13: An Act respecting certain measures in response to COVID-19

    Amendments to the Financial Administration Act (FAA)

    Provides for payments to provinces or territories (for example, to safely restart the economy)

    Covers the period between March 25, 2020, and September 30, 2020

    Currently expired

    Bill C-4: An Act relating to certain measures in response to COVID-19

    Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act (PHENCPA)

    Provides for a continuation of items listed in a schedule relating to the Government’s key medical response measures and emergency supports

    Covers the period between October 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020

    2020–21 Supplementary Estimates (B)

    Provides for a continuation of the Government’s key medical response measures and emergency supports, including payments to provinces and territories

    Covers the period between January 1, 2020, and March 31, 2020

    Subject to approval of the related appropriation bill in December.

    2020–21 Supplementary Estimates (C)

    Provides for a continuation of the Government’s key medical response measures and emergency supports, including payments to provinces and territories

    Covers late payments to be made during the final weeks of the fiscal year and at year-end.

    Subject to approval of the related appropriation Bill in December.

  • The regular supply cycle also continues to operate, with some adjustments, in order to provide government organizations with the financial capacity to continue normal operations.
  • For example, study of the 2020–21 Main Estimates has been extended into the supply period ending December 10, 2020, resulting in approval of two interim supply bills
    2020–21
    Main Estimates
    Interim Supply #1
    (April 1, 2020)
    Interim Supply #2
    (June 26, 2020)
    Full Supply
    (*December 2020)
    $125.2 billion $43.9 billion $55.1 billion $26.2 billion
  • Other legislative items not reported in these Estimates include the Canada Wage Subsidy and enhanced benefits provided through the Employment Insurance Operating Account.

Response

  • The Government of Canada is committed to keeping Canadians safe and healthy and has taken extraordinary action to respond to the impact of COVID-19 by funding emergency and economic response measures and addressing the operational needs of federal organizations.
  • Parliament has approved three supply bills to date: two interim supply bills in support of spending plans outlined in the 2020–21 Main Estimates, and one for additional requirements requested through the 2020–21 Supplementary Estimates (A).
  • Parliament has also approved several legislative measures which provide funding to government departments to implement COVID-19 emergency and economic response measures.
  • Following the decision made by Parliament to extend the deadline to review the 2020–21 Main Estimates to no later than December 10, Parliament will be asked to approve full supply for the Main Estimates in December.
  • Parliament will also be asked to approve supply for these Supplementary Estimates (B) at the same time.
  • We will continue to ensure transparency and the effective parliamentary oversight of all government spending.

Background

Parliamentary approval of COVID-19 response measures

Bills C-12 through C-15 of the 43 Parliament (1st Session) and Bill C-4 of the 43 Parliament (2nd Session) have all provided varying forms of statutory spending authority to respond to the pandemic and related economic crisis.

For example, the Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act (C-13 and C-4), has facilitated many of the Government’s key medical response measures and emergency supports including:

  • the Canada Emergency Response Benefit;
  • the Canada Emergency Student Benefit;
  • the Canada Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance;
  • additional supports for seniors; and
  • purchasing protective gear and medical equipment.

The other legislative provisions provide for such things as:

  • payments to provinces and territories;
  • increased individual benefits (Canada Child Benefit, GST/HST tax credit payment, Canada recovery/caregiver/sickness benefits); and
  • wage subsidies.
Supply cycle

Appropriation Act No. 1, 2020–21 received Royal Assent on March 13, providing roughly $44 billion in interim supply for the Main Estimates for this fiscal year.

On April 20, the House of Commons adopted a motion which modified Standing Order 81 for the 2020 calendar year so that parliamentarians can continue to examine the 202021 Main Estimates during the supply period ending December 10, 2020.

As a result, Appropriation Act No. 2, 2020–21 received Royal Assent on June 17, providing an additional $55 billion in interim supply for the Main Estimates.

At the same time, Appropriation Act No. 3, 2020–21 received Royal Assent for an additional $6 billion in supply for Supplementary Estimates (A), 2020–21, including for some COVID-19 response and recovery measures.

COVID-19 HR management and guidance

29. COVID-19 response and the public service

In this section

Issue

What has been Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat’s role in the federal government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including tracking the impacts to the federal workforce? What measures have been taken with respect to occupational health and safety, duty to accommodate and the involvement of bargaining agents?

Key facts

  • On June 22, 2020, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) shared the government’s approach to easing of COVID-19 restrictions across the country for federal employees, and posted comprehensive guidance for deputy heads to use in developing their own plans for increasing access at federal work sites as provinces and territories ease restrictions. This approach was developed in close collaboration between the Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer, Health Canada and Public Services and Procurement Canada.
  • This guidance supports the continued delivery of programs and services to Canadians, while supporting the physical and mental health of federal public servants.
  • As the number of positive cases of COVID-19 in Canada is rising, governments and public health authorities are responding with measures according to regional and local circumstances and needs. Public health authorities have signalled that physical distancing requirements must remain in place. The public service is moving collectively and successfully towards managing COVID-19 as part of its ongoing operations and the continued delivery of key programs and services to Canadians, and public servants will continue to work remotely, and effectively, for the foreseeable future.
  • Bargaining agents have been engaged from the early days of the pandemic on various issues, including health and safety, through a series of ongoing discussions with the National Joint Council and through the Occupational Health and Safety tables of each organization.
  • Under the Canadian Human Rights Act, employers are responsible for the accommodation of their employees, up to the point of undue hardship (for example, health and safety factors), and the Accessible Canada Act requires all federally regulated institutions to eliminate or avoid the creation of barriers to the full participation of persons with disabilities, in seven areas of activity, including employment.

Response

The Government of Canada has taken exceptional measures to curb the COVID-19 pandemic and to protect the health and safety of its employees and that of all Canadians. Our exceptional workforce has ensured that Canadians receive the services they rely on, under extraordinary circumstances.

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, in consultation with Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada, has been providing regular policy guidance to deputy heads on security, business continuity planning, human resources and workplace issues, procurement, financial management, digital services and privacy.

Working with bargaining agents and departments and agencies and other stakeholders, we continue to review our human resources, IT, security and financial policies to ensure that federal public servants are supported during this pandemic.

Departments are also responding to the pandemic directly by providing equipment and other accommodations to employees, on a case-by-case basis, while taking measures to protect their employees’ physical and psychological health and safety.

The public service is moving collectively and successfully towards managing COVID-19 as part of its ongoing operations and the continued delivery of key programs and services to Canadians.

Public health authorities have signalled that physical distancing requirements must remain in place. This means that many public service employees will continue to work remotely, and effectively, for the foreseeable future.

Background

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat’s role in the COVID-19 response has been to:

  • underscore for the public that the government has plans in place to help ensure continued government operations and the delivery of critical services to Canadians;
  • ensure accurate, effective and consistent internal communications to employees across federal departments and agencies on occupational health and safety, labour relations and human resources issues; and
  • provide guidance and direction to Deputy Heads on security matters, including business continuity planning, flexibilities in policy and regulations, human resources and workplace issues, digital services, security and privacy, so they can continue to deliver services within their organizations and to Canadians during the pandemic.

It has also been tracking the number of COVID-19 cases across the Public Service and publicly reports this number online each week. As of October 21, 2020, 907 cases have been reported

On March 13, 2020, the Government of Canada asked that employees, at all work sites, work from home where possible, and that managers identify an approach that is flexible while ensuring continued critical government operations and services to Canadians.

As a result, many organizations are currently using flexible work arrangements to both protect the health and safety of employees and manage their workforce for business continuity. The vast majority of public servants, including those providing critical services, are working remotely.

Organizations have a general obligation to ensure that the health and safety of every person employed by the organization is protected while they are working. This is achieved by complying with the Canada Labour Code, Part II (the Code), and the standards set out in the Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulations. Also, employers have specific duties in regard to each workplace they control and every work activity under their authority that occurs in a workplace that is beyond the employer's control. Any employee subject to Part II of the Code, has the right to refuse dangerous work as long as they have reasonable cause to believe that it presents a danger.

The National Joint Council regroups the heads of bargaining agent organizations and is the “forum of choice” in the federal public service to discuss issues with bargaining agents; government and union representatives have traditionally demonstrated that partnership and co-development improve the workplace and provide important benefits. Created in 1944, the National Joint Council today includes 18 public service bargaining agents, Treasury Board Secretariat and a number of separate employers as official members.

The Treasury Board Policy on People Management and Directive on the Duty to Accommodate outline the requirements for core public administration organizations to develop an inclusive, barrier-free workplace in which all persons have equal access to opportunities in the core public administration. On April 1, 2020, the directive was updated to expand the coverage to all employees including other equity seeking groups in addition to persons with disabilities.

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat has been providing up-to-date COVID-19 advisories and information for employees on the Government of Canada COVID-19 website.

30. Hazard pay for public servants

In this section

Issue

Will the government be providing hazard pay to those employees who must work from their physical government office?

Key facts

  • On June 19, 2020, the Department of National Defence (DND) announced that hazard pay would be provided to Canadian Armed Forces members, recognizing their exceptional and sustained deployment in long-term care homes supporting Canada’s most vulnerable citizens and their sustained efforts to repatriate thousands of Canadians from abroad during the COVID-19 pandemic. The supplemental payments ended on September 30, 2020, [redacted]
  • Several unions [redacted] have been requesting that hazard pay be provided to federal public servants working on the frontlines in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Many provinces have implemented pandemic pay for frontline workers, but most of these programs have been terminated. The provincial programs, which were in part funded by the federal government, were temporary, with most lasting for approximately sixteen weeks from the outset of the pandemic in March 2020.
  • Plans for the reinstatement or continuation of these pay supplements in most provinces in the event of a more severe second wave are not known at this time. However, on October 1, 2020, the government of Ontario announced that about 147,000 workers in long-term care, hospitals, and community care are eligible for between a $2 and $3 per hour pay increase. These increases will be extended to personal support workers in long-term care and community care. These increases will remain in place until March 2021.
  • Organizations are actively making employees aware of all known or foreseeable hazards and remediating all workplace hazards as they are identified.
  • COVID-19 data for the federal public service indicates that out of 92 organizations reporting on COVID-19 cases, there have been 862 cases as of October 20, 2020. This represents 0.52% of the core public administration and separate employer population reporting COVID-19 infection since the onset of the pandemic.

Response

  • The Government of Canada is taking exceptional measures to curb the COVID-19 pandemic and to protect the health and safety of all its employees, including reducing employees’ risk of exposure, especially for vulnerable employees.
  • The Government of Canada has supported employees throughout this unprecedented situation and, as of October 22, 2020, the Chief Human Resources Officer had issued 18 updates to Deputy Heads on measures taken to support public servants. These have included flexibilities in the Public Service Health Care Plan, leave provisions, and best practices for responding to positive cases in the workplace.
  • We continue to review our human resources policies and employee compensation to ensure that federal public servants are supported as they deliver critical services to Canadians under unprecedented circumstances during this pandemic.
  • We will continue to take all necessary health and safety measures, as advised by public health experts to provide public servants, particularly those whose jobs call on them to work in close proximity to others, with a safe work environment.

Background

In the spring of 2020, the federal government established a $3-billion funding program to subsidize the cost of provincial wage supplements for workers in essential service sectors identified in the federal Guidance on Essential Services and Function in Canada During the COVID-19 Pandemic (e.g., daycares, nursing and retirement homes, medical support services).

The program was intended to offset work disincentives created by the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) for low-income essential workers, as per the Prime Minister’s May 7, 2020, announcement.

However, provinces used the subsidy to extend hazard pay to middle-income provincial government frontline workers who have direct federal government counterparts (e.g., prison guards in Ontario, nurses).

Several private sector organizations also offered additional pay and protections for workers exposed to COVID-19. For example, Loblaws provided 15% additional compensation ($2.25/hr for minimum wage) to store and distribution centre employees, retroactive to March 8, 2020. The majority of these programs have since been discontinued.

The Quebec government also provided support to private-sector low-income frontline workers (e.g., grocery store employees). Workers received $100 each week (approximately $2.50/hr) for up to 16 weeks of eligible work, retroactive to March 15, 2020, to ensure that their earnings were not inferior to the financial support provided by CERB benefits.

31. Public Service Health Care Plan: temporary measures

In this section

Issue

The Government of Canada has introduced temporary changes to the Public Service Health Care Plan (PSHCP) to support employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. PSHCP flexibilities were introduced at the beginning of the crisis and updated as the situation evolved.

Key facts

  • The PSHCP is an employer-sponsored health care plan that offers health benefits to approximately 1.5 million Canadians, comprised of federal public service employees, retirees and their dependants.
  • In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, temporary measures have been put in place to assist PSHCP members and their families during this difficult time. These measures will remain in effect until non-critical business is authorized to resume or unless otherwise indicated.
  • A study by the Conference Board of Canada (April 2020) indicates that 23% of organizations are making changes to employee benefit offerings, including the introduction of virtual psychological and health care services during COVID-19.

Response

  • In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government of Canada implemented temporary changes to the PSHCP aimed at helping plan members and eligible dependants access health care benefits while minimizing social interaction with health care professionals.
  • These temporary measures align with the Government’s guiding principles during COVID-19 which includes stewardship of public funds and caring for the health of our workforce.
  • The Government will continue to work with bargaining agents and stakeholders to monitor the effectiveness of the health care plan temporary measures in order to make sure the plan continues to provide support to members and their families during this difficult time.

Background

The Government of Canada is the plan sponsor for the PSHCP and the President of the Treasury Board (TB) is responsible for the overall management of the PSHCP. The PSHCP is administered by Sun Life Financial on a self-insured basis.

On March 24, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government of Canada implemented the following temporary changes to the PSHCP:

  • Extension of the Emergency Benefit While Travelling;
  • Relaxation of the supply limit for maintenance drugs;
  • Allowing coverage for registered social workers under the mental health benefit (previously only eligible in isolated posts); and,
  • Removing of the prescription requirement for mental health and physiotherapy services.

In April 2020, the Government of Canada extended all but one of the initial temporary measures until non-critical business resumes following the COVID-19 crisis.

The expanded supply limit for maintenance drugs, which was part of the initial PSHCP flexibilities, was intended to allow a supply of medicine for more than the current 100-day limit. This measure was not extended to align with the provincial and territorial regulations that restrict medication dispensing limits to a 30-day supply in order to avoid drug shortages,

Additionally, the following new measures were introduced;

  • Honour existing paramedical prescriptions that have recently expired (must have been eligible as of March 20, 2020), including enhancing communications to increase the awareness of virtual paramedical services that are eligible for reimbursement under the PSHCP; and
  • Further support access to mental health providers by temporarily accepting psychotherapists under the mental health benefit without the requirement of direct supervision by a registered psychologist.

All PSHCP flexibilities introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic will remain in effect until non-critical business resumes or until otherwise indicated.

32. Communications with and services to the public and language of work

In this section

Issue

Some internal and external communications of the Government of Canada during the pandemic have either not been in both official languages or contained translations of poor quality.

Key facts

  • The Commissioner of Official Languages issued a statement on April 23, 2020, indicating a spike in the number of complaints received relating to the Official Languages Act and calling on the government to respect official languages obligations in its communications, particularly given the importance of communicating health and safety information to Canadians in both official languages.
  • In his 2019–2020 Annual Report, published at the end of September 2020, the Commissioner further highlights the shortcomings noted at the beginning of the pandemic in terms of compliance, especially the cases where important information was published in only one official language.
  • Throughout the pandemic, some official language minority community stakeholders and minority media have criticized the federal and provincial governments for their shortcomings with regards to official languages obligations.
  • On Friday, October 23, the President of the Treasury Board was interviewed by Radio Canada on the use of official languages in the pandemic, resulting in minimal French-language media attention.

Response

  • Respecting official languages is not only an obligation of and priority for the Government of Canada, it is integral to the effectiveness of our response to the pandemic.
  • The Government must communicate with and provide services to Canadians in both official languages if their safety and health is to be protected, and we must ensure that the use of official languages is maintained in federal workplaces.
  • Throughout the crisis, my officials took proactive steps to ensure official languages are respected, and upon learning of issues, we have responded robustly, underscoring obligations under the Official Languages Act and highlighting the link between these obligations and an effective pandemic response.
  • We will continue to work closely with the Commissioner and his officials so that the rights and needs of Canadians and public service employees are protected in these unprecedented times.

Background

  • On March 31, 2020, OCHRO brought together persons responsible for official languages of federal institutions, stressing the importance of ensuring that statements, instructions and information be in both official languages at all times during the pandemic.
  • The Commissioner of Official Languages issued a statement on April 23, 2020, highlighting the need for official languages to be respected in times of crisis, especially where the health and safety of Canadians are concerned:
    • “Canadians must be able to understand messages directed to them from all federal institutions, particularly in the current context. Beyond the Official Languages Act, it’s a matter of respect and safety for all Canadians. I have therefore communicated with all deputy ministers and with official languages champions across federal institutions to remind them of the importance of meeting their obligations to communicate with the public and their employees in both official languages at all times in order to ensure the respect and security of all Canadians.”
  • In response, during a meeting of the National Managers’ Community, TBS reminded more than 350 managers across the public service of their official languages obligations on May 4. TBS brought together persons responsible for official languages of federal institutions again on May 29, 2020, and stressed the importance for them to ensure that statements, instructions and information be in both official languages at all times. In addition, in June 2020, OCHRO posted on the Canada.ca COVID-19 website guidance for public servants on how to work remotely and hold virtual meetings in both official languages.
  • In his 2019–2020 Annual Report, published on September 29, 2020, the Commissioner highlighted the compliance gaps observed at the beginning of the health crisis, especially the cases where important information on the health crisis was published in only one official language. He noted an increase in complaints related to communications with the public, but also with regards to communications with federal employees.
  • The Commissioner plans to issue a special report shortly on the link between the safety of Canadians and official languages, which will propose solutions for the observed official languages shortcomings during the crisis. During a meeting of the Committee of Assistant Deputy Ministers on Official Languages (CADMOL), held on October 21, 2020, the Commissioner spoke to the 3 recommendations that will appear in this special report, one of which is directed to the Treasury Board:
    • Develop a strategy to encourage, support and work with various levels of government to integrate both official languages into communications during emergency or crisis situations.

In addition to this, the commissioner plans to issue a special report in coming months on what the he has identified as a systemic problem within the federal public service relating to the identification of linguistic profiles for positions. The report will outline an in-depth analysis of this issue with recommendations to help resolve it.

TBS met recently with the commissioner’s office to obtain details on the nature of the complaints under section 91. We will analyze the commissioner’s special report and respond once it is published. We will continue to support institutions through training and workshops in properly identifying language requirements of positions and promoting the Treasury Board’s online tool for determining the linguistic profile of bilingual positions.

It is also important to note that the federal government has, as of late, strengthened its support for official languages:

  • In June 2019, new Official Languages (Communications with and Services to the Public) Regulations were promulgated that will result in the designation of 700 new bilingual offices throughout the country by relying on a new, more inclusive, mechanism for determining such requirements, which makes reference to the presence of minority language schools and includes immigrants and bilingual families. The amended Regulations were well received by minority community stakeholders.
  • In addition, the Prime Minister has mandated the Minister of Official Languages, Mélanie Joly, to lead the modernization of the Official Languages Act. TBS, along with Justice Canada, is a key player in the work surrounding the modernization and has conducted in-depth analyses of the proposals and recommendations for modernizing the act.

33. Enabling technology: equipment, collaboration tools and network capacity to support public servants

In this section

Issue

With an unprecedented number of federal public servants working remotely, the Government of Canada (GC) has ensured that government workers are appropriately equipped to maintain continued operations.

Key facts

  • There are approximately 287,000Footnote 1 federal public servants.
  • On a daily basis, the GC is averaging nearly 200,000 remote connections.
  • Secure remote access capacity has increased by 72% since the start of COVID-19.
  • The GC has accelerated the implementation of Microsoft 365, allowing up to Protected B collaboration.
  • As of October 14, 2020, close to 207,000 federal employees are using Microsoft Teams (part of Microsoft 365) to collaborate, with more than 162,000 public servants using Microsoft Teams to host virtual meetings in the past month.
  • A new, and permanent, Emergency Communication System, supports the GC’s business continuity activities, for up to and including Protected B work and collaboration, and currently has over 687 users.Footnote 2
  • Daily teleconference usage has skyrocketed, from 1.6 million minutes/day to up to 5 million minutes/day, supported by a doubling in service capacity.
  • 183,000 smartphones are now enrolled on Wi-Fi calling, enabling employees to make and receive calls in areas with poor cellular service.

Response

  • The COVID-19 pandemic continues to transform the government’s operational and service landscape. In mounting our response, we have accelerated our digital transformation, delivering results that directly support Canadians during this time of crisis while strengthening its foundation to become a more open, user-centric and resilient digital government for the future.
  • We are working to ensure that public servants are appropriately equipped to continue delivering critical services and information to Canadians during these unprecedented circumstances.
  • In situations where new equipment is to be purchased, federal organizations have been reminded of their duties to be stewards of public funds, and to ensure that value-for-money is considered in all actions.
  • New tools have been deployed that allow employees to work and collaborate with their colleagues.
  • The deployment of Microsoft 365 has been accelerated across government to allow collaboration and remote conferencing that follows appropriate levels of security. Close to 207,000 federal public servants are now using these collaborative tools.

Background

The pandemic has prompted an unprecedented shift, requiring a majority of the 287,000 federal public servants to work remotely.

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) is working with Shared Service Canada (SSC) to actively support the ongoing operation of the government’s IT infrastructure and systems and to maintain continuity of critical federal services.

Ensuring that departments and public servants have the knowledge, tools and equipment they need to work remotely means increasing network capacity to support the rise in remote work across government; prioritizing network access and IT services to maintain critical service continuity; providing guidance on the use of tools such as Zoom, Google Meet, and GCCollab when access to the GC network was not available; mobilizing the CIO community to identify support needs; providing real-time feedback on IT needs in core service areas; and coordinating government action to ensure key IT infrastructure continues to function.

OCIO is working closely with departments and agencies to support service delivery by strengthening Business Continuity Planning, identifying critical services, and focusing committee forward agendas on COVID-19-related efforts. TBS is also working with SSC and Public Safety Canada to identify critical service interdependencies, including between services identified in departmental service inventories, critical services and the supporting IT systems.

The Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer has developed a remote working toolkit, available to all federal public servants, providing helpful advice, tips, and tricks to both existing and new public servants. This toolkit touches on areas including (but not limited to):

  • Mental Health
  • Setting up your workspace
  • Communications with your colleagues
  • Official Languages

34. Security and information management during COVID-19

In this section

Issue

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and a large portion of the public service working from home, concerns have been raised regarding potential risks associated with security and information management.

Key facts

  • In the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, many organizations limited remote network access to address the increased number of employees working remotely, with some organizations using third party collaboration tools like Zoom to carry out virtual meetings, as well as to share unclassified information and complete work-related tasks.
  • In her letters to the President of the Treasury Board on April 2, 2020, and April 28, 2020, the Information Commissioner of Canada reminded the Government of the importance of documenting decisions and proactively disclosing data during these extraordinary times.
  • On May 5, the President of the Treasury Board and the Information Commissioner of Canada met to discuss the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to information and information management in the Government of Canada.
  • On June 3, the President sent a letter responding to the Information Commissioner’s recommendations shared on April 28, 2020, concerning the ATI system, recognizing the importance of adhering to best practices in information management and mentioning upcoming plans the GC has to better support information practices across government.
  • TBS will release an updated version of the Guideline on Service and Digital in November 2020 that will provide organizations with the most current advice and guidance for the strategic management of information and data.

Response

  • The Government remains committed to managing information securely and effectively, in accordance with its sensitivity, while ensuring transparency, openness and accountability to Canadians.
  • All public servants are expected to manage, secure, and document information according to legislative requirements and Treasury Board policies, whether working on-site, or remotely, and regardless of the tools they use.
  • Tools that are publicly available can only be used for unclassified, non-sensitive discussions that would be otherwise permitted in an open, public setting. 
  • We are currently reviewing and updating all information management (IM) policy instruments and identifying where new requirements are needed so we ensure that we have the right set of rules in place for managing information in the digital age, whether working remotely or in the office.
  • Robust systems and tools are in place to monitor, detect and investigate potential cyber-security threats, including compromised information that may result from working remotely.

Background

Government of Canada employees were reminded of the requirements to manage information securely and effectively in accordance with its sensitivity and all relevant policy and legislative requirements while working remotely. These requirements are set out in legislation, including the Library and Archives Act, as well as in Treasury Board policy instruments, including the Policy on Service and Digital and Directive on Service and Digital, and the PGS, including the Directive on Security Management.

These requirements include the obligation of employees to document decisions and activities of business value. This includes information, regardless of medium or form, which is created or acquired because it enables and documents decision-making in support of programs, services and ongoing operations, or supports departmental reporting, performance and accountability requirements. Information of business value, no matter where it is created or collected, is required to be transferred to and stored in the appropriate organizational corporate repository.

Employees are also required to ensure the security and proper handling of sensitive information, consistent with the security categorization of the information, as outlined in the PGS instruments. This means respecting security markings, and making sure that appropriate tools, devices and methods are used to store, transmit, use and protect the information. In the case of third-party applications, such as Zoom and Google Drives, their use is acceptable for unclassified information. Employees have been reminded to use approved GC tools and services for collaboration and communication, such as Office 365, MS Teams, and GC Tools, wherever possible.

Further, TBS is currently reviewing and updating all information management (IM) policy instruments from the former Policy on Information Management, as well as identifying areas where new IM policy requirements may be needed, to ensure that we have the right requirements in place for managing information in the digital age, whether working remotely or in the office.

TBS will release an updated version of the Guideline on Service and Digital in November 2020 that will provide organizations with the most current advice and guidance for the strategic management of information and data.

TBS continues to provide guidance to organizations on information management and security. We released the guidance entitled “Managing information while working remotely” as well as a toolkit to further guide employees in managing government information when working remotely. The toolkit has been updated regularly since its initial release to ensure it provides the most relevant and up-to-date guidance on managing information when working remotely.

35. Business continuity management

In this section

Issue

How is the Government of Canada responding to the impacts of COVID-19 on its employees and the health and safety of Canadians, including ensuring continuity and availability of critical services to Canadians through Business Continuity Management (BCM) practices.

Key facts

  • As of October 1, 2020, 249 Critical Services (CS) were identified across 49 of the 107 departments and agencies subject to the Policy on Government Security (PGS).
  • A key component of business continuity is Critical Services which are defined in the PGS as: “a service or activity whose disruption would result in a high or very high degree of injury to the health, safety, security or economic well-being of Canadians or to the effective functioning of the Government of Canada."
  • During the initial response to COVID-19, 39 departments/agencies activated business continuity plans to focus on continued delivery of their identified critical services.
  • Overall, departments demonstrated significant responsiveness and adaptability. Issues noted included inconsistent network connectivity (due to the remote working arrangements), a need for alignment between critical services and critical IT systems/applications, and a need for increased GC situational awareness.

Response

  • The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the government’s capacity to deliver trusted programs and services to Canadians.
  • The Policy on Government Security includes requirements for organizations to develop and maintain Business Continuity Plans (BCPs), and they were asked to ensure their plans are up to date for any possible disruption.
  • Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government has continued to deliver critical programs and services, including developing, and ensuring quick access to, new emergency financial supports.
  • In parallel to the continued delivery of critical services, departments and agencies are working to achieve the timely recovery of other services and activities as the situation evolves.

In collaboration with Public Safety, TBS is assessing the BCM response to COVID-19 to inform future BCM practices, preparedness, and response from a whole-of-government perspective and to support the ongoing trusted delivery of critical services to Canadians during significant events.

Background

Business continuity management

TBS’s Policy on Government Security (PGS) applies to 107 departments and agencies and sets out mandatory requirements for Business Continuity Management (BCM), including:

  • establishing governance, authorities and responsibilities for the departmental Business Continuity Plan (BCP) program;
  • identifying and prioritizing departmental critical services and assets using a business impact analysis (BIA) process, and;
  • developing, testing/exercising and maintaining related BCPs.

BCPs must also support the ability to maintain an acceptable level of delivery of critical services and activities in the event of disruption (including, for example, a Pandemic), and the ability of the organization to achieve timely recovery of other services and activities in the event of a disruption.

Public Safety Canada (PS) is identified in the PGS as the Lead Security Agency (and technical guidance lead) for BCM within the Government of Canada.

TBS and PS are undertaking a Capability Improvement Process, including developing an “After Action Report” to inform and evolve the Government of Canada’s Business Continuity Management policy approach, while at the same time looking forward to a future state of CS readiness.

Critical services list for the Government of Canada

A key component of business continuity is the identification of departmental Critical Services, defined in the PGS as: “a service or activity whose disruption would result in a high or very high degree of injury to the health, safety, security or economic well-being of Canadians or to the effective functioning of the Government of Canada.”

TBS has worked with departments to establish a GC Critical Services List, inclusive of the COVID-19 context, including additional exceptional measures to support Canadians.

The list will continue to evolve in response to government priorities and to inform strategic decision-making and discussions, as well as to inform prioritization efforts of enterprise service providers such as SSC.

PS mapped interdependencies (identifying assets including IT, facilities and HR which directly support the CS) to support continued delivery of critical services, working closely with TBS.

TBS, PS and SSC are collaborating on a life-cycle management framework to align and evergreen CS data with the overarching GC Service Inventory, including developing a methodology to weight and prioritize CS using a GC lens ,including strengthening the linkages between CS and critical IT systems/applications.

Current picture of GC critical services

As of October 1, 249 Critical Services were identified across 49 of the 107 departments subject to the PGS.

This work complements other components of the COVID response, including the efforts of the Government Operations Centre, the GC Pandemic Plan, Guidance for Essential Services in Critical Infrastructure Sectors, and ongoing advice from the Chief Human Resources Officer.

The COVID-19 Pandemic clearly demonstrates the importance of an evergreen Critical Services List and continued business continuity readiness in strengthening the resiliency of Government to ensure continued trusted delivery of government services to Canadians during significant events/disruption.

Public servants: general

36. Collective bargaining

In this section

Issue

Is this the right time for the government to be negotiating new collective agreements for public servants?

Key facts

  • Negotiations with most bargaining agents have been ongoing since 2018 and TBS, as the employer, continues to have a duty to bargain in good faith with all bargaining agents. To date, the government has reached 46 agreements that cover nearly 224,000 or more than 80% of federal public service employees.
  • Negotiations with the Border Services (FB) group, represented by the Public Services Alliance of Canada (PSAC) and RCMP members and reservists represented by the National Police Federation are ongoing. In addition, negotiations are ongoing between the PSAC and seven separate agencies, including the National Capital Commission (NCC) and the Communications Security Establishment (CSE).
  • As well, a Public Interest Commission process was conducted for the IT professionals (CS group) represented by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC). A PIC report for this group was released in September 2020 and is favourable to the government’s current bargaining strategy. The parties are returning to the negotiation table in late October 2020.

Response

  • The Government of Canada remains committed to reaching agreements with all bargaining agents that are fair to employees, mindful of today’s economic and fiscal context and reasonable for Canadians.
  • Subject to ratification, we have concluded collective agreements covering more than 80% of public servants for this round of bargaining.
  • We have also participated fully in the work of Public Interest Commissions where negotiations have led us to that step.
  • Recognizing the impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the economy, and uncertainty in the economic outlook, most of the recent tentative agreements cover a three-year period ending in 2021, rather than the four-year period of agreements reached prior to July 2020.
  • Economic increases in the first two years of these tentative agreements are reflective of the relatively strong economic environment in 2018 and 2019, while a lower economic increase was agreed to for the third year of the agreements, recognizing the reduced economic growth expected for 2020 and early 2021.
  • We continue to take constructive steps to advance negotiations while taking our economic reality into account.

Background

  • Between July 9 and October 17, 2020, the Government concluded 11 tentative agreements in the context of the 2018 round of bargaining. Once ratified, the Government will have reached 46 agreements with groups covering close to 224,000 employees or over 80% of public servants in the core public administration (CPA) and separate agencies – out of the 61 agreements across the public service.
  • All 11 agreements include pattern economic increases, new provisions for caregiver leave, extended parental leave, and a memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on the implementation of collective agreements. Ten of the agreements also include up to 10 days of paid leave for domestic violence [redacted]
  • As of October 21, 2020, bargaining agents have declared an impasse for nine groups in the CPA and separate agencies. All third-party processes (Public Interest Commission (PIC)) are concluded and the reports have been released. Eight of these groups are represented by the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) and one by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC). Of these only the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) represented by PSAC and the Computer Services (CS) group has not come to a tentative agreement.
  • The bargaining agents cannot strike until seven days after the issuance of the PIC report, the conduct of a strike vote, and after 30 clear days have passed, as specified in the FPSLRA, following the establishment of an Essential Services Agreement (ESA). Of the two groups that remain outstanding CSE has signed an ESA and the Computer Systems (CS) group has not. The PSAC suspended all strike vote activity in mid-March 2020 in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and most of its groups have arrived at tentative agreements.
  • The government will prepare for all possible outcomes, including failure to reach an agreement. TBS, departments and agencies are ensuring that there are contingencies in place, including ESAs, should labour action be taken by the bargaining agents.
Core public administration

The PIC report for the CS group represented by the PIPSC was released on September 10, 2020.

Negotiations with the Border Services (FB) group, represented by the PSAC are ongoing.

Separate agencies

The PIC hearings for four separate agencies have taken place and reports have been issued:

  • The Canada Revenue Agency and the PSAC’s Union of Taxation Employees concluded a tentative agreement on July 24, 2020. This agreement was ratified on September 29, 2020.
  • The Canadian Food Inspection Agency and Public Service Alliance of Canada reached a tentative agreement on September 2, 2020, for its employees represented by the Union of Agriculture.
  • The Parks Canada Agency and the Public Service Alliance of Canada reached a tentative agreement on September 4, 2020.
  • Employees of the CFIA and Parks have until November 4, 2020, to ratify the agreements.
  • The PIC hearing with the CSE and PSAC took place from June 2 to 3, 2020. The PIC report was issued on June 23, 2020. Negotiations between the parties are ongoing.

37. Phoenix damages

In this section

Issue

In June 2019, the Government of Canada announced that it signed a joint agreement with bargaining agents, with the exception of the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC), to compensate employees (current and former) who may have been impacted by the Phoenix pay system. To date, the Government of Canada has provided general compensation to eligible employees, put in place a general compensation claims process for former employees, and launched a claims process for those who had financial costs and lost investment income as a result of pay issues.

A separate agreement was negotiated with PSAC which was ratified on October 23, 2020.

Key facts

  • In June 2019, the Government of Canada and a number of public service unions finalized an agreement to compensate employees, current and former, who were impacted by the Phoenix pay system.
  • Some elements of the agreement have already been implemented and implementation of the remaining provisions will be done at the end of November 2020.
  • The PSAC agreement is similar to the 2019 agreement with the exception of general damages provided to employees which consist of cash payments instead of leave credits as well as additional compensation for the late implementation of the 2014 collective agreements.
  • The June 2019 agreement contains a catch-up clause for the inclusion of provisions which are more generous in the PSAC agreement. The parties to the June 2019 agreement will begin negotiations shortly related to those provisions.

Response

  • All public servants deserve to be accurately paid for their work, and the Government of Canada continues to take action on all fronts to resolve pay issues.
  • We recognize that the implementation of the Phoenix pay system has had an impact, directly or indirectly, on employees.
  • These agreements aim to compensate employees for damages caused by the Phoenix pay system in the core public administration and separate agencies.
  • The agreement reached with bargaining agents (with the exception of PSAC) in 2019 applies to up to 121,000 current and 25,000 former employees.
  • The more recent agreement reached with PSAC, in 2020, will apply to up to 168,000 current and 53,000 former employees.
  • As part of both agreements, there are measures to help those who had financial costs and lost investment income, in addition to the provision of general compensation.
  • Individuals who have filed claims under the June 2019 agreement are seeing those claims for compensation processed and have seen their leave banks credited by up to 5 days.
  • The infrastructure for the June 2019 agreement will be replicated for the implementation of the PSAC agreement.

Background

In May 2019, the Government of Canada reached a tentative agreement with members of the Senior Level Phoenix Union-Management subcommittee on damages for compensation for employees impacted by the implementation of the Phoenix pay system. This agreement was ratified in June 2019 by all federal government bargaining agents except the PSAC. Separate agencies have signed similar agreements covering their employees (except those represented by PSAC).

The Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) rejected the agreement, stating the compensation was insufficient.

June 2019 Damages Agreement (all bargaining agents except PSAC)

The agreement includes up to five days of additional annual leave for employees and a cash payout equivalent to this leave for former employees or the estates of deceased employees.

Additional compensation, evaluated on a case-by-case basis, is provided for those who missed opportunities to earn interest on savings accounts or other investments, experienced delays in receiving severance or pension payments, and/or experienced severe personal or financial hardship due to Phoenix pay issues.

In 2019, federal organizations credited eligible employees with four days, and one additional day for the 2019–20 fiscal year was credited in July 2020 to current employees. This leave represents general compensation for financial and/or non-financial damages caused by Phoenix, including but not limited to general stress, aggravation and lost time.

Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat collaborated with bargaining agents and worked to launch in November 2019 an online claims process by which former employees can request a payment for general compensation for damages, which is a payment equivalent to the leave credited to current employees. These former employees can now go online and access what is owed to them.

In February 2020, assessment processes were added to provide compensation to current and former employees for financial costs or lost investment income.

An assessment process for claims related to severe personal or financial hardship is expected to be launched at the end of November 2020.

2020 PSAC Damages Agreement

The PSAC agreement is similar to the June 2019 agreement with the exception of the general damages provided to employees which consist of cash payments of up to $2,500 instead of leave credits. This includes an additional lump sum of up to $1,000 for the late implementation of the 2014 collective agreements.

The other claims processes for financial costs or lost investment income as well as severe personal or financial hardship are identical.

General compensation for the PSAC agreement will be provided to current employees in 2021 as the process is being finalized and the other claims processes will be launched at a later date.

As the infrastructure is already in place for the June 2019 agreement, additional resources have been budgeted for the implementation of the PSAC agreement.

38. Next Generation HR and Pay Initiative

In this section

Issue

Update on the Next Generation HR and Pay Initiative

Key facts

  • In March 2020, after extensive evaluation, and testing, the Government announced that SAP had been selected to work with our team on a pilot for a new Human Resources and Pay solution.
  • The NextGen team at SSC has engaged SAP on a series of discussions to assess organizational capacity and readiness to work on NextGen under the current COVID-19 circumstances.
  • On October 14, 2020, the selection of the Department of Canadian Heritage for the first exploratory phase of the Next Generation HR and Pay project was announced. The exploratory phase is expected to last approximately six months; however, this time frame could be shortened or lengthened depending on the findings.

Response

  • We continue to work towards a long-term and sustainable HR and pay solution to meet the diverse needs of federal employees across Canada.
  • The government has committed $117 million to co-design and deliver pilot projects to test solutions against the real complexity of federal government HR and pay needs.
  • In March 2020, the Government of Canada announced SAP as the vendor selected to begin exploratory work on a new Human Resources and Pay solution.
  • Effective April 1, 2020, leadership for NextGen was transitioned from Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat to Shared Services Canada because of its expertise and experience in the delivery of enterprise solutions.
  • The Chief Human Resources Officer at Treasury Board Secretariat remains the Business Owner and a key collaborator of the NextGen initiative.
  • The Department of Canadian Heritage has been selected for the first exploratory phase of the NextGen project.
  • The NextGen team will work collaboratively with Canadian Heritage and SAP to test solutions for a reliable, integrated HR and pay solution for the Government of Canada while keeping the people who will be using this new system at the core of our mandate.
  • Knowledge and results from this phase will help inform and define the way forward. Employees’ pay will not be affected. The exploratory phase will take place in a controlled environment that is separate from Phoenix.
  • This important work continues under the current COVID-19 circumstances.

Background

Budget 2018 announced the Government’s intention to move away from Phoenix and begin development of a pay system that will be better aligned with the complexity of the federal government’s human resources and pay structure.

TBS received $16 million over two years, beginning in 2018–19, to explore replacement options for a next generation human resources and pay solution.

In September 2019, the Government announced that it will invest $117 million to co-design and deliver pilot projects for the NextGen HR and Pay system.

In March 2020, after extensive evaluation, and testing, it was announced that SAP had been selected to work with our team on a pilot for a new Human Resources and Pay solution.

The NextGen team at SSC engaged SAP on a series of discussions to assess organizational capacity and readiness to work on NextGen under the current COVID-19 circumstances.

Initial focus of work with SAP included establishing governance and oversight, project management tools and protocols and development of a detailed plan to pilot the solution in a core department.

Effective April 1, 2020, leadership for NextGen was transitioned from Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat to Shared Services Canada. The Chief Human Resources Officer at Treasury Board Secretariat remains the Business Owner and a key collaborator of the NextGen initiative.

On October 14, 2020, the selection of the Department of Canadian Heritage for the first exploratory phase of the Next Generation HR and Pay project was announced.

The Government will work with the selected vendor (SAP) and the Department of Canadian Heritage to develop a business case, privacy impact assessment, change management and other planning considerations to learn how a future HR and pay solution can integrate information from multiple compensation-related HR systems.

Canadian Heritage was selected as the first exploratory phase Department because their organization provides a good representation of the government’s human resources complexities, including multiple occupational groups, regional representation, overtime, and other considerations.

The exploratory phase will not affect employees’ pay. It will occur in a controlled environment that is separate from Phoenix. Canadian Heritage employees will continue to be paid through the Phoenix pay system while testing is completed.

The Government continues to work with stakeholders, such as bargaining agents, employees, and HR and pay practitioners, and will continue to engage in an open and transparent manner, so that the new solution can address the needs of a modern public service and its employees as soon as possible.

Ongoing stabilization of the Phoenix pay system remains a top priority for the government and is being pursued by Public Services and Procurement Canada.

39. Public Service Health Care Plan (PSHCP) negotiations

In this section

Issue

Negotiations for the Public Service Health Care Plan (PSHCP) were delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Bargaining agents and retiree representatives signalled a desire to launch formal negotiations in a letter dated September 11, 2020, to the President of the Treasury Board from the National Joint Council (NJC).

Key facts

  • The PSHCP is an employer-sponsored health care plan that offers health benefits to approximately 1.5 million Canadians, comprised of federal public service employees, retirees and their dependants.
  • The PSHCP is negotiated with bargaining agents and retiree representatives at the PSHCP Partners Committee, under the umbrella of the NJC.
  • The PSHCP was last renewed in 2014.
  • [redacted] This increase is largely due to rising benefit costs, changes to economic assumptions and demographics, and the growing size of the public service.

Response: PSHCP renewal

  • The Government is committed to ensuring the long-term sustainability of the PSHCP amid growing external cost pressures and the fundamental requirement to support the health and well-being of its employees.
  • The Government of Canada also remains committed to good faith bargaining and reaching a financially sustainable agreement with bargaining agents on a modernized PSHCP that is fair to employees, mindful of today’s economic and fiscal context and provides value for Canadians.
  • In consultation with bargaining agents and retiree representatives, the government is reviewing the PSHCP provisions to identify areas where adjustments could be explored in order to better align with similar employer-sponsored plans and industry best practices.
  • Our goal is to take constructive steps to advance negotiations as soon as possible and our approach to these negotiations will be rooted in the economic state of the country, which has changed dramatically with COVID-19.
  • The new realities we face in light of the pandemic will need to be taken into consideration as we move forward with negotiations for a modernized PSHCP. We must consider the valuable work provided by public servants in support of Canadians while also recognizing the very difficult circumstances created by the global pandemic.

Background

The PSHCP is negotiated with bargaining agents and retiree representatives at the PSHCP Partners Committee, under the umbrella of the National Joint Council (NJC). Once consensus is reached, the Partners Committee formulates a joint recommendation for consideration. The President of the Treasury Board will then present the proposal to the Treasury Board, the final authority to approve the PSHCP benefit changes pursuant to subsection 7.1(1) of the Financial Administration Act.

The PSHCP was last renewed in 2014. In anticipation of upcoming negotiations, a benchmarking study was commissioned by the PSHCP Partners Committee. The two studies, as well as costing of possible PSHCP benefit changes, were completed in fall 2019. These studies provide a framework to establish recommendations that will help update the PSHCP.

[redacted] This increase is largely due to rising benefit costs, changes to economic assumptions and demographics, and the growing size of the public service. The PSHCP requires modernization to remain sustainable and comparable with similar employer-sponsored plans.

The PSHCP renewal discussion had continued at the PSHCP Partners Committee without prejudice, pending an approved negotiations mandate. However, discussions were put on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the pandemic, PSHCP temporary measures were introduced to help PSHCP members and eligible dependants access health care benefits while at the same time minimizing social interaction with health care professionals. It is anticipated the bargaining agents may want some of the COVID-19 related temporary measures to become permanent (such as expanded mental health service providers and removal of physician prescription requirements).

On September 11, 2020, bargaining agent and retiree representatives signalled a desire to launch formal negotiations. This desire was outlined in a formal letter sent to the President of the Treasury Board from Dany Richard, NJC Co-Chair (bargaining agent side).

On September 23, 2020, the Speech from the Throne signalled steps would be taken to establish a national pharmacare strategy. Depending on how this program is implemented, significant long-term savings could be achieved under the prescription drug portion of employer-sponsored health benefit plans such as the PSHCP.

40. Duty to accommodate

In this section

Issue

The employer has a legal obligation to accommodate an individual’s needs when they stem from one or more grounds of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act. This obligation remains when employees are required to work from a remote location.

Key facts

  • Under the Canadian Human Rights Act, employers are responsible for the accommodation of their employees, unless undue hardship, including in respect of health and safety, does not permit it.
  • In addition, the Accessible Canada Act requires all federally regulated institutions to eliminate and avoid the creation of barriers faced by persons with disabilities, in seven areas of activity, such as employment.
  • TBS provides guidance to core public administration organizations on their ongoing responsibilities under the Policy on People Management and the Directive on Duty to Accommodate.
  • Specific guidance has been developed to assist managers and employees in navigating the challenges in equipping and accommodating employees working remotely.
  • In general, accommodation requests should be considered on a case-by-case basis, to ensure employees have access to the tools and support measures they need to succeed in their jobs regardless of where they are working.
  • Managers are encouraged to have open and constructive conversations with their employees about their accommodation needs and to streamline any administrative processes related to the provision of these accommodations.

Response

  • The government’s people management policies aim to ensure that the public service is high performing, and that employees are appropriately equipped and able to contribute to their full potential to serve Canadians.
  • Managers should make every effort to create an inclusive work environment for all their employees and to provide them with the tools and supports they need to carry out their responsibilities.
  • The exceptional circumstances of a global pandemic led us to examine and modify how we proceed to ensure we continue to meet our Duty to Accommodate obligations.
  • Managers and employees must consider every possible option to accommodate their employees, and, across the public service, departments are responding by providing employees with equipment to work remotely while safeguarding their health and safety. This includes ensuring employees are appropriately accommodated on a case-by-case basis.
  • The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat is also providing guidance to managers on inclusive virtual meetings and the use of various communications technologies.

Background

The Treasury Board Policy on People Management and Directive on the Duty to Accommodate outline the requirements for core public administration organizations develop an inclusive, barrier-free workplace in which all persons have equal access to opportunities in the core public administration. On April 1, 2020, the directive was updated to expand the coverage to all employees including other equity seeking groups and not just persons with disabilities.

These policies aim at ensuring that the public service is high performing and that the talents of each employee can be best utilized to serve Canadians.

A Benchmarking Study of Workplace Accommodation Practices in the Federal Public Service (published in May 2020) was conducted to gather critical feedback from employees and their managers about the process of requesting an accommodation for persons with a disability. The Study identified the areas that need improvement, with the overall goal of improving the accommodation process to ensure all employees are appropriately equipped and able to contribute to their full potential. The results from this Study will inform the work ahead, in order to ensure that employees can receive accommodations efficiently and in a timely manner, with the ultimate objective of creating an accessible and inclusive workplace for all federal public servants.

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the obligation to accommodate an employee, up to the point of undue hardship, remains the same whether the employee works at their workplace or from a remote location. Specific guidance on the Duty to Accommodate and equipping employees for remote work was published in August and is available as part of the Guidebook for departments on easing of restrictions on Canada.ca.

Office of the Auditor General

41. Funding for the Office of the Auditor General

In this section

Issue

Concerns about the adequacy of funding for the Office of Auditor General have been raised by the Office and by Parliamentarians.

Key facts

Office of the Auditor General – Reference levels as reflected in Main Estimates

2014–15 2015–16 2016–17 2017–18 2018–19* 2019–20 2020–21
77,741,830 78,295,020 78,533,732 77,501,971 78,224,516 88,238,296 87,906,474

*This does not reflect additional in-year funding received in 2018–19

Response

  • The Government of Canada is committed to supporting the important and ongoing work of the Auditor General.
  • The OAG’s reference levels were increased by $8.3 million in 2018–19 to improve the Office’s financial audit capacity in response to an increase in the volume and complexity of government operations and transactions.
  • The increase was in response to the OAG’s request and was announced in Budget 2018.
  • Of that amount, $7.8 million was for personnel (38 new FTEs), operating costs (IT systems, travel) and Employee Benefit Plans, and $0.5 million was for the 13% PSPC Accommodation premium for office space.
  • When an Officer of Parliament, such as the Auditor General, identifies the need for additional resources, they must make their request to the Government.
  • The Government considers these requests carefully to ensure that the Office can continue to fulfill its mandate efficiently and effectively.

Background

The OAG’s reference levels were increased by $8.3 million in 2018–19 to improve the Office’s financial audit capacity to respond to an increase in the volume and complexity of government operations and transactions.

This funding contributed to ensuring that the Office continues to meet service standards, provide accurate and timely audit information, and renew its self-managed IT systems. As a result, the OAG’s FTEs increased by 7% or 38 FTEs. Of the 38 new FTEs, 28 were for audit operations, and 10 were IT technical staff.

To receive additional funding, the Office of the Auditor General would need to make a request through the Minister of Finance. The Office would then work with the Treasury Board Secretariat to develop a submission to seek the necessary authorities to access the funding approved.

OAG officials have been vocal in committee for some time and have reiterated their complaint in the context of COVID-19, saying that the lack of funding for the Office has left them no choice but to delay work on most audits as the pandemic adds new demands on the resource-stretched Office.

A news article in iPolitics published on May 12, 2020, states that “the office is requesting $10.8 million in new funding in order to meet new demand and modernize. It currently has a budget of about $88 million, employing about 575 people. The Liberal government provided $8.2 million more annually in 2018 but a request in 2019 fell on deaf ears.”

Long-term care facilities

42. Revera Inc.: Public Sector Pension Investment Board

In this section

Issue

Various media outlets have published articles about the Public Service Pension Investment Board (PSPIB) and its relationship with Revera Inc., a company that runs long-term care and senior housing retirement residences in Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom. The company is currently facing a class-action lawsuit related to deaths as a result of COVID-19.

The Ontario Health Coalition held a town hall on September 17 to discuss ending the for-profit privatization of long-term care, with specific reference to Revera. They also planned a Day of Action on Long-term Care across Ontario on October 8. Further, the Public Service Alliance of Canada intends to present a proposal to make Revera public at an annual meeting of the pension advisory committees. These activities have resulted in media coverage and increased attention on the PSPIB’s management of Revera.

Key facts

  • The Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSPIB) is a Crown corporation established under the Public Sector Pension Investment Board Act (act), and its reports are tabled each year in Parliament.
  • There is an established and merit-based process for nominating members to the Board of Directors of the PSPIB. The President of the Treasury Board appoints members based on recommendations from a Nominating Committee.
  • Revera is a wholly owned operating subsidiary of the PSPIB and is governed by a board of directors appointed by the PSPIB.
  • As of June 2, the Ontario Government had taken over the management of one of the Revera long-term care facilities (Forest Heights) for a period of 90 days.

Response

  • The federal government underlined its commitment to Canada’s seniors and to setting new national standards for long-term care in the most recent Speech from the Throne so that we can ensure that seniors are safe, respected and can live with dignity.
  • The Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSPIB) operates at arm’s length from the federal government. It is not part of the federal public administration and its multi-billion-dollar business and affairs are managed by a board of directors.
  • The mandate of the PSPIB is to invest net proceeds from the contributions of the public service, Canadian Armed Forces, Reserve Force, and Royal Canadian Mounted Police pension plans in capital markets, in the best interests of the contributors and beneficiaries under those acts.
  • Revera is a wholly owned operating subsidiary of PSPIB, registered under the Canada Business Corporations Act. PSPIB is responsible for appointing its board of directors, who are, in turn, responsible for Revera’s operations.
  • We are aware of reports of legal action against this company and cannot comment further on matters before the courts.

Background

Revera Inc. has been a wholly owned subsidiary of the PSPIB (also known commercially as PSP Investments) since 2007. The PSPIB is a Crown corporation established by Parliament by the Public Sector Pension Investment Board Act in 1999. The PSPIB reports to Parliament through the President of the Treasury Board, who is responsible for PSPIB’s legislation, and includes certain information about Revera Inc. in its annual report.

The PSPIB operates at arm’s length from the federal government. It is not an agent of Her Majesty and its business affairs are governed by a 11-member Board of Directors. Since April 1, 2000, the PSPIB has been investing the amounts transferred by the Government of Canada on behalf of the pension plans for the public service, the Canadian Armed Forces – Regular, the Canadian Armed Forces – Reserve (since its establishment on March 1, 2007), and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat does not recommend the appointees to the PSPIB Board of Directors to the President, however, it does play the role of the secretariat to the Nominating Committee for the PSPIB. Qualified candidates are recommended to the President by this Nominating Committee.

Pursuant to the Public Sector Pension Investment Board Act, the President of the Treasury Board is responsible for establishing a Nominating Committee whose mandate is to establish a list of qualified candidates for proposed appointment as a director of the board of the PSPIB. The Chairperson is appointed by the President of the Treasury Board after he or she has consulted with the Ministers of National Defence and Public Safety. Upon recommendation of qualified candidates by the Nominating Committee, the President of Treasury Board will make a recommendation for appointment to the Governor in Council.

Revera Inc. is an owner, operator and investor in the senior living sector. Through its portfolio of partnerships, Revera owns or operates more than 500 properties across Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom, offering seniors’ apartments, independent living, assisted living, memory care, and long-term care.

On September 17, 2020, the Ontario Hospital Coalition organized a town hall in Ottawa to discuss the need to improve long-term care. They have also organized a day of action on October 8 in Toronto outside Queen’s Park and across Ontario outside MPPs offices. The intention of the day of action is to create political pressure to expose the lack of action to improve care in long-term care and to push for an end to for-profit privatization of long-term care.

The Public Service Alliance of Canada has also indicated its intention to present a proposal at the annual Tri-PAC meeting on September 25. This meeting consists of members from three advisory committees, which are the Public Service Pension Advisory Committee (PSPAC), the Canadian Forces Pension Advisory Committee (CFPAC) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Pension Committee (RCMPPAC). These committees consist of members from the respective federal departments, nominated bargaining agent representatives from the National Joint Council as well as Pensioners’ representative.

On September 23, the Speech from Throne committed the Government to working with the provinces and territories to set new, national standards for long-term care so that seniors get the best support possible.

43. Conflict of Interest Act and safeguards related to procurement

In this section

Issue

The Conflict of Interest Act required a one-time statutory review which was completed in 2014.

Key facts

  • The Conflict of Interest Act is administered, interpreted, and enforced by the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, an independent officer of Parliament.
  • The President of the Treasury Board is the responsible minister for the Conflict of Interest Act.
  • The Conflict of Interest Act required a statutory review by a parliamentary committee. This review was completed in 2014 by the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI). No further reviews are required by law.

Response

  • The Government is committed to ensuring that federal public office holders carry out their duties with integrity and impartially.
  • The Conflict of Interest Act imposes rules to minimize the possibility of conflicts between private interests and the duties of public office holders.
  • The Government is committed to open, fair and transparent contracts and real property agreements. It has a number of safeguards in place to address conflicts or potential conflicts within procurement, such as:
    • standard contract clauses;
    • the requirement for evaluators to recuse themselves where there’s a real or perceived conflict of interest; and,
    • a provision in the Directive on Transfer Payments stating that no current or former public servant or public office holder can derive direct benefit from a funding agreement.
  • We welcome input from parliamentarians and the Commissioner on how well the Conflict of Interest Act is achieving its objectives.

Background

The Conflict of Interest Act establishes conflict of interest and post-employment rules for public office holders. Public office holders covered under the act include ministers, ministerial staff, and Governor-in-Council appointees such as deputy heads. The act plays an important role in maintaining public confidence in the integrity of public office holders and government decision-making.

The Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner administers the Conflict of Interest Act by establishing compliance measures, investigating possible contraventions of the act, and providing advice to public office holders on their obligations. The Commissioner is an officer of Parliament. Officers of Parliament are independent from the Government and report directly to Parliament. On January 9, 2018, Mario Dion was appointed as the second Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner.

The Conflict of Interest Act came into force on July 9, 2007, which created, for the first time, a legislative regime governing the ethical conduct of public office holders. Prior to this date, public office holders were subject to non-statutory codes of conduct.

The Conflict of Interest Act required a one-time statutory review by a parliamentary committee. In 2014, the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics (ETHI) completed the review of the act. ETHI recommended some changes to the law, including expanding the act’s definition of public office holder, clarifying certain provisions, and adjusting the administration of the act. Later that year, a regulation was enacted to add new positions subject to the act (e.g., Governor of the Bank of Canada). The act has not received any further substantive amendments.

There are also safeguards in place to address potential or actual conflicts of interest within procurement. These include standard contract clauses, the requirement for all proposals to be reviewed through a conflict of interest lens, and the need for evaluators to recuse themselves for real or possible conflicts. In addition, the Government of Canada has established a Code of Conduct for Procurement, an Integrity Regime, and utilize fairness monitoring to address conflicts of interest and unethical practices.

A provision is also included in the Directive on Transfer Payments, to ensure that no current or former public servant or public office holder can derive direct benefit from funding agreement. Furthermore, no member of the Senate or the House of Commons shall be admitted to any share or part of the agreement, or to any benefit arising from it, that is not otherwise available to the general public.

44. Directive on Conflict of Interest

In this section

Issue

In addition to the Conflict of Interest Act, the Treasury Board Directive on Conflict of Interest provides safeguards to prevent and resolve situations of conflict of interest in the public service.

Key facts

  • The Treasury Board Directive on Conflict of Interest, issued under the Policy on People Management, imposes requirements to minimize the risk of conflicts of interest and is a condition of employment for persons employed in the public service.
  • The Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector is also a condition of employment for all public servants in the federal public sector, and it outlines the values and expected behaviours that guide public servants in all activities related to their professional duties.
  • The Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer supports the President of the Treasury Board in its role as the employer in the area of people management, and in its role to promote ethical practices in the public sector.

Response

  • The Government is committed to promoting a positive and respectful public sector culture that is grounded in values and ethics, where federal public servants carry out their duties with integrity and impartially.
  • Pursuant to the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act, the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector sets out measures to promote an ethical climate, including the public sector values and expected behaviours for all public servants.
  • The Treasury Board Directive on Conflict of Interest imposes requirements to minimize the possibility of conflicts between private interests and the duties of public servants.

Background

The Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act reflects the Government of Canada’s commitment to promote ethical practices in the federal public sector and foster a positive environment for the disclosure of wrongdoing. The act provides federal public sector employees with a secure and confidential process for disclosing serious wrongdoing in the workplace, and protects them from acts of reprisal.

On April 2, 2012, the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector was implemented in compliance with the requirement of Section 5 of the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act. The code sets out measures to promote an ethical climate, including outlining the values and expected behaviours of public sector employees and replaces the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Service (2003).

Federal public sector organizations have each implemented organization-specific codes of conduct in compliance with the requirement of Section 6 of the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act.

Compliance with the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector and organizational codes of conduct is a condition of employment for all federal public servants.

Under the Treasury Board (TB) Policy on People Management, the renewed TB Directive on Conflict of Interest came into effect April 1, 2020. The directive sets out the requirements for public servants to prevent and resolve conflict of interest situations. Compliance with the directive is a condition of employment for public servants employed within the core public administration, as defined by section 11(1) of the Financial Administration Act. Organizations outside the core public administration have their own conflict of interest policies with similar requirements to the TB Directive on Conflict of Interest.

Mandatory training is offered to all federal public servants, in order to ensure they understand their conditions of employment under the Values and Ethics Codes for the Public Sector and the Directive on Conflict of Interest. The mandatory training covers the areas of public servants’ disclosure protection, values and ethics, and conflict of interest, and is available to all public servants through the Canada School of Public Service.

Other TBS directives and guidance: COVID-19

45. Directive on Disposal of Surplus Material

In this section

Issue

The disposal of expired face masks and gloves and how these stocks are managed in accordance with Treasury Board policy.

Key facts

  • In April 2020, it was reported in the media that the Government of Canada disposed of two million N95 masks and 440,000 medical gloves from the National Emergency Strategic Stockpile (NESS) at the Regina warehouse operated by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC).
  • The masks and gloves had been purchased in 2009 and had passed the limit of five years for their use, as recommended by the manufacturer.

Response

  • The Government of Canada’s top priority is the health and safety of Canadians.
  • Treasury Board policy requires that the National Emergency Strategic Stockpile (NESS) be reviewed regularly for expired, obsolete, or unusable items. Items are removed in order to protect the health and safety of Canadians.
  • The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) will continue to explore ways to optimize product life cycle management and minimize the disposal of expired stock.
  • The Government will review stockpile management to ensure we have the right system in place for health supplies to support Canadians in times of emergency.

Background

The Treasury Board Policy on Management of Materiel provides direction for the management of departmental materiel assets throughout their life cycle and seeks to ensure sound stewardship of the Crown’s materiel assets.

Additionally, the Policy requires that a materiel management information system is in place that incorporates a risk-based stocktaking schedule and supports timely and informed materiel management decisions.

The associated Treasury Board Directive on Disposal of Surplus Materiel applies to items that are nearing end of life and are deemed surplus. These items could then be disposed of through transfer, donation, sale or conversion to waste. The Directive provides options and flexibility to departments for transferring these surplus assets to organizations including other departments, other level of governments and not for profit agencies.

46. Administrative flexibilities during COVID-19

In this section

Issue

At the onset of the pandemic, the Treasury Board provided flexibility on policy requirements to ensure federal organizations could quickly execute response measures to deliver immediate and short-term outcomes for Canadians.

Key facts

  • Since March 2020, critical decisions and exceptional efforts by departments have been and are still needed to mobilize Canada’s collective emergency response.

Response

  • Since the onset of the pandemic, departments and agencies have been called upon to deliver programs and services with unprecedented urgency and speed.
  • Treasury Board acted to allow departments to orient maximum resources towards pandemic response and to provide greater flexibility to maintain the operations of government while the Government responds to COVID-19. Actions included providing additional time for departments to submit investment plans, deferring the effective date of some requirements, and allowing certain ministers the time-limited ability to amend terms and conditions of select transfer payment programs.
  • In addition, the Treasury Board Secretariat provided policy guidance to deputy heads and functional communities on security, business continuity planning, human resources, procurement, digital services, access to information and privacy. Our goal was to provide departments the guidance they needed so our exceptional workforce could support emergency response measures and continue to provide the services Canadians rely on, under extraordinary circumstances.
  • Early in the crisis, deputy ministers were instructed to put a priority focus on achieving the goals of the government’s response measures. They were asked to use sound judgment in using maximum flexibility when applying Treasury Board administrative policies and exercising their authorities.
  • Accountability and transparency remain paramount: deputy heads were directed to ensure that the circumstances, rationale and process for decision-making were well documented.
  • This helps the government account for the decisions made during this crisis, including any non-standard applications of Treasury Board policy.
  • The Auditor General was informed of this direction.

Background

In mid-March 2020, as a result of COVID-19, several emergency measures were taken by Canadian jurisdictions, including closing schools, businesses, and public events. Provincial governments and the federal government grappled with the closure of workplaces and how to respond to the pandemic.

To expedite and streamline implementation of the government’s response and to support the departments in responding to the pandemic, certain existing processes needed to be modified or expedited, including the application of rules set out in the Treasury Board policy suite. Departments required flexibility to implement elements of the Government’s response to COVID-19 under their respective mandates and to do so they needed flexibility to support collective Government efforts.

Treasury Board delegated the approval of amendments and exceptions to Treasury Board policies to the President of the Treasury Board. The delegated authorities were in force until September 30, 2020, to align with the statutory authorities established through the COVID-19 Emergency Response Act and approved amendments and exceptions are generally in place until March 31, 2021.

The President of the Treasury Board, supported by the Secretariat, proposed these actions to support the continuing efficient operations of government to allow departments to orient maximum resources towards pandemic response and, to provide greater flexibility to maintain the operations of government while the Government responds to COVID-19. [redacted]

Examples of these actions include:

  • An exception to the Policy on Transfer Payments, which allowed the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness to sign a contribution agreement with the Canadian Red Cross to support immediate and future COVID-19 related needs;
  • An exception for the recovery of advance payments to allow the delay of the recovery of advance payments in cases where a payment has already been made, but the supplier is not able to deliver the goods and/or services by March 31, 2020, as planned in the contract, due to the COVID-19 pandemic; and,
  • Extending the deadline for submission of new reporting requirements by one year including: the annual updated list of planned projects, the associated procurement strategies and the criteria used for prioritizing, and the collection of project baseline information for projects with total cost of $25 million or greater.

In addition, the Secretariat provided significant guidance to departments to provide greater clarity on a range of priorities including:

  • Guidance providing updated direction to federal custodians on rent relief;
  • Guidance on mental health and COVID-19 resources for public servants to help equip employees, managers and executives in managing their mental health during the pandemic; and,
  • Guidance to fleet managers to Includes advice such as minimizing the use of all non-essential vehicles (such as administrative) to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19.

Recognizing the challenges that departments and agencies were going to face in applying Treasury Board administrative policies not only in the delivery of emergency programs and initiatives, but in their day-to-day operations as they functioned at reduced capacity, then Treasury Board Secretariat provided supporting direction to deputies in March 2020.

47. Directive on Real Property Management: rent deferral

In this section

Issue

The nature and approach to providing rent relief to commercial tenants impacted by COVID-19 where the federal government is the landlord.

Key facts

  • The federal government acts as a landlord with about 3,000 commercial tenants from small businesses to large enterprises.
  • Many federal commercial tenants have requested relief due to hardship as a result of pandemic impacts.
  • The government’s Canada Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance (CECRA) program, in partnership with provinces and territories, provided 75% rent reductions to eligible commercial tenants with participating private sector landlords for the period of April to September 2020.
  • Federal landlords were expected to align with core CECRA criteria and provide rent reductions to their eligible commercial tenants.
  • Federal landlords have provided other rent relief in the form of deferrals of rents due.
  • The government has announced proposed new targeted support to help businesses through the pandemic, pending parliamentary approval of legislation, including the Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy (CERS).

Response

  • The Government of Canada is taking strong and quick action to protect the health and safety of all Canadians, stabilize our economy, and help workers and businesses in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • The government is responding to the hardships faced by small businesses that are tenants in federal buildings or on federal lands.
  • Departments, agencies and Crown corporations have provided targeted rent relief to federal tenants since the beginning of the pandemic through rent deferrals.
  • On April 24, the Prime Minister announced that the new Canada Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance (CECRA) program will provide 75% rent reductions to eligible commercial tenants with private sector landlords for the months of April, May and June. It was then extended to the end of September.
  • Federal landlords aligned with core CECRA program criteria and provided similar arrangements for eligible small businesses, charities and not-for-profit tenants.
  • On October 9, 2020, the Government announced proposed new targeted support to help businesses through the pandemic, including the new Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy (CERS).

Background

At least 25 federal entities lease space to about 3,000 commercial tenants. Most federal landlords have received requests from some tenants for some form of rent relief.

Rent relief can take the form of deferral (amounts can be paid later, but are still owed in full), or reduction (where amounts owed by tenants are reduced).

On March 31, the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) provided rent relief guidance to core departments and agencies to consider deferrals as a first step and target businesses in hardship (versus large enterprises). Crown corporations were urged to consider this guidance as well. Most departments and agencies took measures that aligned with this guidance.

After the Prime Minister’s announcement of CECRA details on April 24, the government indicated its desire that federal landlords, including Crown corporations, align with CECRA’s core program criteria. On May 28, the President of the Treasury Board of Canada wrote to Crown corporation portfolio ministers, requesting this alignment by agent Crown corporations, while self-funding non-agents were asked to apply directly to the program. On June 1, Parks Canada Agency announced a relief solution for its tenants that met and built on the intent of CECRA. On June 2, TBS issued guidance to aid departments in implementing the direction to align with the CECRA’S core criteria.

As the CECRA program parameters evolved, including extensions for the months of July, August, and September 2020, TBS issued subsequent guidance.

On October 9, 2020, the Government announced proposed new targeted support to help businesses through the pandemic, including the new Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy (CERS). The CERS is intended to be directed towards tenants and, pending parliamentary approval of legislation, is planned to be in place until June 2021. TBS is working with the Department of Finance to determine the implications of the planned CERS for federal landlords. On October 20, 2020, TBS issued guidance to address the interim situation where Deputy Heads may elect to defer rent in advance of further clarity on CERS.

48. Regulatory flexibility for Canadian businesses

In this section

Issue

Industry stakeholders have been reaching out to the Government of Canada to ask for guidance and support in addressing regulatory compliance challenges in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Key facts

  • TBS has asked that federal departments and agencies consider demonstrating flexibility across the regulatory cycle in developing, applying, and enforcing regulations, within their specific context, in consideration of the risk to the health, safety, and security of Canadians and the environment.
  • While TBS is continuing to prioritize issues related to COVID-19, departments and agencies are re-initiating work on regulatory initiatives underway prior to the pandemic that support the government’s mandate and that have an important impact on Canadians.
  • TBS has also encouraged departments and agencies to coordinate with their provincial and territorial counterparts, as well as horizontally with other regulators.

Response

  • The Government of Canada took strong and quick action to protect the health and safety of all Canadians, stabilize our economy, and help workers and businesses in the context of COVID-19.
  • The Government continues to support Canadian businesses and industry who, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, are either facing hardship or bringing forth new products or services in support of Canada’s response plan.
  • We are exploring options under Canada’s regulatory system and implementing measures to help address some of the challenges that businesses face in complying with certain federal regulations.
  • We are taking a balanced, common sense approach in developing, applying and enforcing regulations in consideration of the risk to the health, safety and security of Canadians and the environment.
  • We are taking steps to ensure that new regulatory proposals or changes to existing regulations required to address the COVID-19 situation are given top priority, while also ensuring that non-COVID-19 regulatory proposals that are necessary and important continue to be addressed.

Background

To address challenges faced by stakeholders, TBS has asked that federal departments and agencies consider demonstrating flexibility across the regulatory cycle in developing, applying, and enforcing regulations, within their specific context, in consideration of the risk to the health, safety, and security of Canadians and the environment.

In considering flexibility, TBS has also encouraged departments and agencies to coordinate with their provincial and territorial counterparts, as well as horizontally with other regulators.

In addition, TBS is taking steps to ensure that new regulatory proposals or changes to existing regulations that are required to address the COVID-19 situation are given top priority. However, departments and agencies have advised that they have capacity to undertake more normalized operations and are seeking to advance other regulatory initiatives. TBS continues to work with departments to prioritize submissions and to ensure that stakeholder impact is considered in the context of the pandemic and economic situation.

49. Government of Canada protecting personal information during COVID-19

In this section

Issue

What is the government doing to protect the personal information of Canadians during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Key facts

  • The Privacy Act requires that government institutions protect Canadians’ personal information. TB Privacy policies and guidance support institutions to meet these obligations.
  • COVID-related initiatives, such as the COVID Alert app, have been designed to protect Canadians’ privacy.
  • In May 2020, TBS issued guidance to government institutions on the collection and disclosure of personal information from employees in relation to the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Government institutions have legal authority to collect information from their employees in relation to the management of the COVID-19 pandemic under the Canada Labour Code.
  • In June 2020, TBS issued an Interim Privacy Policy and Directives to ensure privacy is protected while delivering on urgent COVID-19-related initiatives, such as enhanced border measures and quarantine call centres.

Response

  • The Government is committed to protecting Canadians’ privacy as we navigate through the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • To support the Government’s urgent response to the pandemic, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat has issued an Interim Privacy Policy and related Directives concerning privacy protection.
  • The Interim Policy and related Directives give the heads of government institutions the discretion to undertake a condensed, but still rigorous, analysis of privacy considerations to ensure privacy is protected in the implementation of urgent COVID-19 initiatives.
  • These measures have succeeded in ensuring that privacy is protected as we move forward with the urgent benefits and supports that Canada needs to manage and respond to the pandemic. We continue to work with institutions and with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner to ensure that the privacy of Canadians is protected as we respond to the COVID-19 crisis.

Background

In May 2020, TBS issued guidance to government institutions on the collection and disclosure of personal information from employees in relation to the management of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In June 2020, TBS issued an Interim Privacy Policy and Directives to ensure privacy is protected while delivering on urgent COVID-19-related initiatives such as the implementation of enhanced border measures and quarantine call centres.

Specifically, the changes enable institutions to complete a condensed Privacy Compliance Evaluation for urgent COVID-19 related initiatives, rather than a full Privacy Impact Assessment, which can take months. The intent of the Interim Policy and Directives is to ensure that privacy risks are identified, and privacy is protected in urgent COVID-19 related initiatives. The Interim Policy and related Directives will be in effect until March 31, 2021.

Government also received a range of proposals from Canadian and multinational companies with innovative ideas to address challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the economic recovery efforts that will follow. These digital solutions range from contact tracing mobile applications and health data platforms, to AI-driven analytics tools to optimize public and private sector supply chains. In response to these offers, Industry, Science and Economic Development (ISED) officials engaged with these firms to collect information about the proposed projects and company capabilities, and liaising with counterparts from Health Canada (HC) and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) to match potential digital solutions to specific and urgent public health needs.

Officials assessed the privacy implications of the proposals and verified that proposals are consistent with Canadian privacy laws which resulted in the development and implementation of the COVID alert app. The app lets people know of possible exposure so they can take appropriate action to protect others, all while using anonymized data and protecting user privacy.

The Privacy Commissioner has emphasized that privacy laws can be applied flexibly and contextually and should not be a barrier to appropriate information sharing, but they must still apply. The Commissioner issued a framework to assess privacy-impactful initiatives in response to COVID-19. The framework urges institutions to apply best practice standards, which go beyond existing legislative and policy requirements, in order to protect privacy.

50. Government of Canada protecting personal information

In this section

Issue

What is the government doing to protect the personal information of Canadians and prevent privacy breaches?

Key facts

  • The Privacy Act requires that government institutions protect Canadians’ personal information. TBS Privacy policies and guidance support institutions to meet these obligations.
  • Since 2019, TBS has been implementing a Privacy Breach Action Plan which focuses on strengthening the prevention and management of privacy breaches across government.
  • Recent cyber attacks have highlighted the need to continue to protect personal information.

Response

  • The Government of Canada is committed to ensuring that Canadians’ personal information is kept safe and secure.
  • Since 2019, the government has been implementing the Privacy Breach Action Plan which focuses on strengthening the prevention and management of privacy breaches across government.
  • Recent cyber attacks have highlighted the importance of our work to protect personal information.
  • We continue to work closely with the cybersecurity and privacy communities to ensure material privacy breaches are quickly identified, mitigated and reported to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.
  • As the government continues its transformation to a more digital government, privacy protection will continue to be a top priority.

Background

The Privacy Act requires government institutions to protect Canadians’ personal information.

The Interim Directive on Privacy Practices requires government institutions to establish plans and procedures for addressing privacy breaches in their institutions which must include roles and responsibilities and mandatory reporting of material privacy breaches.

Material breaches are breaches that involve sensitive personal information – such as medical and financial information – and could reasonably be expected to cause injury or harm to the individual.

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) monitors the material breaches reported by institutions across government and identifies where additional guidance or training may be required.

In his Annual Report to Parliament, tabled in October, the Privacy Commissioner was critical of the Government’s handling of privacy breaches. In particular, he claims that many cyber incidents are not treated or reported as material privacy breaches.

Since 2019, TBS has been implementing the Privacy Breach Action Plan which focuses on strengthening the prevention and management of privacy breaches across government.

The Action plan has three main priorities:

  1. To raise awareness about privacy breaches for federal workers and key communities
  2. To improve training for federal employees
  3. To strengthen policies, guidance, and tools.

While progress on the Privacy Breach Action Plan activities was slowed by the COVID-19 crisis, TBS has renewed these efforts.

TBS is working in close collaboration with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner throughout this process.

51. Access to information and transparency during COVID-19

In this section

Issue

  1. Workplace measures to curb the COVID-19 pandemic and protect the health and safety of federal employees have affected institutions’ ability to respond to access to information and personal information requests.
  2. The Information Commissioner has called for immediate action to repair the federal access system.

Key facts

  • To respond to COVID-19, most employees are working from home, many with reduced access to documents and information systems they would usually use to respond to requests.
  • There are no provisions in the Access to Information Act or the Privacy Act to extend deadlines or place requests on hold due to an emergency.
  • On May 28, 2020, the President wrote to his Cabinet colleagues encouraging Ministers to proactively publish as much information as possible related to COVID-19 and remind them of the importance of ensuring best practices in information management.
  • On June 3, the President sent a letter responding to the Information Commissioner’s recommendations shared on April 28, 2020, concerning the ATI system, recognizing the importance of adhering to best practices in information management and mentioning upcoming plans the GC has to better support information practices across government.
  • As of October 26, 2020, all 131 institutions that responded to TBS’s weekly capacity questionnaire indicated that they have full capacity to respond to requests.
  • As of October 26, 2020, there were 316 COVID-19 related records available for Canadians to access on the Open Government portal, including data concerning key initiatives such as Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB), Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) and the Canada Emergency Student Benefit (CESB).

Response

  • The Government remains committed to maintaining the openness and transparency of government during this challenging time.
  • The Access to Information Act requires that government institutions make every reasonable effort to assist those who request information and respond to requests in a timely manner.
  • Since the onset of COVID-19 workplace measures, institutions have worked hard to mitigate the impacts on their ability to respond to access to information or privacy requests.
  • In response to the Information Commissioner’s recommendations, the Government committed to making information related to COVID-19 and the Government’s response proactively available.
    • As of October 26, 2020, all 131 institutions that responded to TBS’s weekly capacity questionnaire indicated that they have full or partial capacity to respond to requests.
    • As workplace restrictions continue to be lifted and capacity is increased, ATIP Offices are addressing outstanding requests.
  • In addition to guidance issued by the Treasury Board Secretariat, I have asked ministers to ensure they make best efforts to respond to Access to Information Act and Privacy Act requests and to proactively publish content.
  • The Government will continue to work with the Information Commissioner to meet Canadian’s’ needs for open, accessible, and trustworthy information.

Background

Government of Canada employees are currently working from home wherever possible to help slow the spread of COVID-19. Consequently, most institutions are operating with significantly reduced onsite workforces, which limits their ability to respond to requests and within the timelines mandated by the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act.

Request processing

TBS has issued guidance to institutions to make best efforts to process requests and proactively publish information, in accordance with operational realities. Notices currently posted on the Open Government Portal and the Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Online Request Service inform requesters of potential delays due to COVID-19 measures. TBS continues to support institutions with suggested best practices for working digitally to respond to requests. As of October 26, 2020, all 131 institutions that responded to TBS’s weekly capacity questionnaire indicated that they have full capacity or partial capacity to respond to requests.

Since the onset of COVID-19 measures, institutions have worked hard to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 measures on their ability to respond to requests:

  • Institutions are offering to provide electronic records to requesters, where paper records cannot currently be accessed.
  • Institutions are utilizing e-post where possible to facilitate providing responses to requesters electronically.
  • In addition, to help reduce pressures on the access to information system during these extraordinary times, the President of TBS, Jean-Yves Duclos, wrote to his Cabinet colleagues to encourage Ministers to proactively publish as much information as possible related to COVID-19 as well as reminding them of the importance of ensuring best practices in information management.
  • TBS also organized workshops to share best practices to help ATIP Offices adapt their procedures to the remote work environment.
  • The ATIP Online Request Services has remained available as a simple and efficient means for Canadians to submit requests to over 190 federal institutions.

As workplace restrictions continue to be lifted and capacity is increased, ATIP Offices are addressing outstanding requests. In particular, increased access to offices is enabling institution to process classified records for responses to ATI requests.

The review of the Access to Information Act, which began in June 2020, offers an opportunity to have an open exchange on making ATI systems and processes more resilient.

In October 2018, the Government launched the new ATIP Online Request Service in an effort to modernize the ATIP process for Canadians. That was an important first step in making ATIP a digital process by enabling Canadians to make access to information and personal information requests electronically to more than 190 institutions. In its use of artificial intelligence in the portal, the government is helping requesters choose the institution that is most likely to have the information they want. Its continued use during the pandemic has enabled Canadians to submit requests without leaving their homes and institutions to receive requests remotely.

The Government continues to update and improve the ATIP Online Request Service with tools and functionality, making the receipt, processing and delivery of requests more secure and efficient. We continue to work on how to streamline the process and avoid paper and compact discs.

Parallel to its work on the ATIP Online Request Service, the Government is also undertaking a procurement process to ensure modern ATIP request processing software is in the hands of the government institutions.

OCIO continues to engage with the Offices of the Information Commissioner and Privacy Commissioner to ensure that these oversight bodies are aware of institutions’ operational status.

Ensuring transparency

The Information Commissioner wrote to the President of the Treasury Board on April 2 and April 28, 2020, reminding government of the importance of documenting decisions and recommending measures to reduce the pressures on the access to information system during these extraordinary times.

On July 10, 2020, the Information Commissioner wrote to the President of the Treasury Board calling for strong leadership and concrete actions by government to repair the access to information system.

In response to the Information Commissioner’s concerns, the President of the Treasury Board, in his capacity as designated Minister for the administration of the Access to Information Act across the federal government, and as a member of the Cabinet Committee on the federal response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), wrote to Cabinet colleagues encouraging Ministers to have institutions proactively publish as much information as possible as well as remind them of the importance of ensuring best practices in information management.

On April 29, 2020, the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) published guidance on information management practices while working remotely for all public servants.

This guidance is meant to reinforce employees’ awareness of their collective responsibility to document decisions of business value and to ensure that government information is managed securely and effectively with respect to legislative and policy requirements, including the requirements of the Access to Information Act and Privacy Act.

52. Emergency contracting

In this section

Issue

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, changes to the Contracting Policy (Appendix C) were made to continue to enable emergency contracting by government departments.

Key facts

  • Effective March 20, 2020, the Treasury Board increased the emergency contracting limit for the Minister of Public Services and Procurement from $15 million to $500 million and has raised the emergency contracting limit for all Ministers from $1 million to $3 million. These amendments were extended on October 1, 2020, and are in effect until March 31, 2021.
  • These changes were necessary to continue to enable quick response to support government operations in an unprecedented situation.

Response

  • Federal departments and agencies continue to be called upon to deliver--with urgency and speed--the Government of Canada’s response to COVID-19, to protect the health and safety of all Canadians, stabilize our economy, and help workers and businesses and the financial hardship they face.
  • The Government is providing temporary increases to limits for emergency contracting to enable the quick and efficient procurement of necessary resources in the context of COVID-19.
  • Departments are required to document their decision-making when they issue emergency contracts, including those under these increased limits, and to report to Treasury Board Secretariat.
  • Some departments have already provided reports on emergency contracting, with the most common good procured being personal protective equipment (PPE).
  • Most emergency contracts continue to be proactively disclosed on the Open Government website, with possible limited exceptions when there is a concern that such disclosure would compromise the competitive position of the government, such as in the purchase of PPE.

Background

Basic rules around emergency contracting from TB Contracting Policy, Appendix C

Until March 31, 2021, every department has $3M emergency contracting approval limit, for use in a pressing emergency.

Additionally, there are several special emergency approval limits. Of note, PSPC may enter into a contract up to $500 million without TB approval, with the following conditions:

  • The Minister invokes the National Security or Extreme Urgency provisions of the applicable trade agreements;
  • Normal contracting procedures can’t be followed due to urgency; and
  • The applicable departmental Minister approval to use the special authority.

PSPC continues to coordinate centralized purchases of specific commodities, such as personal protective equipment, on behalf of the Government of Canada, and the Provincial and Territorial Governments.

  • For emergency procurements between $3 million and $500 million, departments are expected to use PSPC contracting services.

Departments can enter into contracts without soliciting bids when “the need is one of pressing emergency in which delay would be injurious to the public interest” as set out in the Government Contracts Regulations.

Departments are required by the Treasury Board Contracting Policy to document all contracting decisions and to report to TBS within 60 days on any contracts and contractual arrangements issued under the emergency contract approval limits.

Due to the COVID-19 situation, departments’ ability to meet timelines for proactive publication of contracts may be affected.

Policy on Decision Making in Limiting Contractor Liability in Crown Procurement Contracts, section 8.5

Where justified, in emergency contracting situations, departments also have the authority to limit contractor liability or indemnify contractors, subject to CFO approval.

Departments are to provide a report to the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) within 60 days of the authorization or beginning of the work with all the limitation or indemnification details and including a financial assessment, approved by departmental CFOs. For emergency contracts issued by PSPC on behalf of a department, it is the client (for example, spending) department’s CFO that needs to approve.

Proactive publication and protecting the competitive position of the government on emergency contracts

Generally, contracts over $10,000 (including contracts for PPE) are proactively disclosed on the Open Government website within 30 days after the end of the first three fiscal quarter (and 60 days after the fourth fiscal quarter), unless such contracts are exempt from disclosure under the Access to Information Act.

The disclosure of procurement information in relation to emergency contracts (mostly related to PPE), such as supplier name and contract value could jeopardize orders and compromise Canada’s negotiating position, particularly in international markets.

In the context of proactive disclosure of contracts over $10,000, the discretionary exemption at paragraph 18(b) of the Access to Information Act may be considered when making an assessment about whether or not to publish information about certain contracts when there is a concern that such disclosure would compromise the competitive position of the government.

As of October 21, 2020, ten departments have provided reports on emergency contracting, including PSPC. The emergency contracting limits were used 218 times for a total of $5.8 billion with the majority of contract amounts awarded by the Minister of PSPC ($5.7 billion).

Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Public Services and Procurement Canada continues to coordinate the purchase of personal protective equipment (PPE) on behalf of government and will report on emergency contracts (including those for PPE) to the Treasury Board Secretariat. Public Services and Procurement Canada has also provided some information on PPE purchases on its website, for added oversight and transparency. The release of certain contract information will remain pending until the pandemic is over and maintaining confidentiality is no longer an issue.

Footnotes

Footnote 1

GC InfoBase, June 2020, Infographic for Government of Canada.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Shared Services Canada (SSC), Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat’s (TBS) Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) and the Canadian Digital Service (CDS), June 2020, Digital Support for COVID‑19, page 3.

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Page details

Date modified: