Appearance Before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP)

Notice to readers

This report contains either personal or confidential information, or information related to security, which has been redacted in accordance with the Access to Information Act.

2019 Spring Reports of the Auditor General of Canada
Report 4: Oversight of Government of Canada Advertising
February 23, 2021

On this page

Opening statement and overview of the audit

1. Opening remarks for Peter Wallace, Secretary of the Treasury Board, for the Standing Committee on Public Accounts

February 4, 2021
Ottawa
Check against delivery

Introduction

Thank you, Madame Chair.

I am joined today by Kelly Acton, Assistant Secretary of Strategic Communications and Ministerial Affairs at the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS).

After my opening remarks, Ms. Acton and I are available to answer any questions you may have.

The subject of today’s meeting, the study of the non-partisan review process for government advertising, was one of the five reports presented by the Auditor General in the spring of 2019. This review process was implemented in 2016.

Recommendations and responses

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat has addressed all of the recommendations outlined in the 2019 Spring Reports of the Auditor General of Canada.

The first recommendation was to consider a risk-based approach to identify campaigns with a higher risk for partisanship. At issue in this recommendation is a determination of what the best indicator is of risk. To date, ad spend has been that indicator.

  • After an analysis of the review process, it was concluded that a consistent dollar-based target remains the most reliable indicator of risk.
  • And the threshold has now been reduced for mandatory review of ad campaigns from $500,000 to $250,000. This new threshold reflects the changing nature of the industry, and the greater use of digital media in advertising campaigns.
  • This approach is designed to capture at least 80% of the government’s annual advertising budget.

The second recommendation was to ensure that Ad Standards documents the rationale for its assessment of government advertising campaigns against all non-partisan review criteria.

In response, a new evaluation form for Ad Standards to assess ad designs and better document their findings has been developed by TBS officials and implemented in the process.

The third recommendation was to assess the appropriateness and application of the two-stage review process to ensure that it’s effective and works as intended.

  • This process is set up to ensure ads are reviewed twice: once early in the production process and again before going to market. This allows creatives to be reviewed and modified – if needed – before incurring significant costs or delays.
  • Officials found that depending on the type of media used in the advertising, the period of time between reviews fluctuated. Based on the findings, it was determined that the process was working as intended and did not need to be changed.
  • Informed by work on this recommendation, Madame Chair, guidance was developed to help ensure departments plan the timing of their review requests to Ad Standards. This guidance was shared with departments and posted on Canada.ca.

The Auditor General’s fourth recommendation was to improve how officials monitor ad campaign reviews, and whether Ad Standards is thoroughly and consistently applying all non-partisan criteria in its reviews.

  • In fall 2019, a panel, consisting of officials from both TBS and Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC ), began assessing a sample of Ad Standards’ reviews each quarter and determined that Ad Standards was applying the criteria consistently. This oversight is ongoing.

The fifth and final recommendation called for an independent and objective process to receive, review, and respond to public complaints about partisanship in government advertising.

  • In 2020, after looking at options, including the feasibility of implementing an independent complaint process, a pilot project was established to accept, review, and report on public complaints in this area.
  • The public can submit a complaint online about Government of Canada (GC) advertising they feel is partisan. The nature of the complaint and the findings of the review would be posted on Canada.ca.

Conclusion

Madame Chair, TBS is committed to ensuring that there continues to be strong independent oversight of Government of Canada advertising.

This audit identified process gaps and not substantive deficiencies in oversight. As noted, the recommendations have been addressed.

Kelly and I are prepared to answer your questions.

2. Auditor General Report: Oversight of Government Advertising (spring 2019)

[Redacted: The content of this section is published material and can be viewed Auditor General Report: Oversight of Government Advertising (spring 2019).]

3. Management Action Plan: Oversight of Government Advertising 2020

3a. Management Action Plan

[Redacted: The content of this section is published material and can be viewed at Management Action Plan: Oversight of Government Advertising 2020.]

3b. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Detailed Action Plan to the Recommendations of the Oversight of Government of Canada Advertising of the Spring 2019 Reports of the Auditor General of Canada

Report Ref. No. OAG Recommendation Departmental Response Description of Final Expected Outcome/Result Expected Final Completion Date Key Interim Milestones (Description/Dates)
4.32 The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat should consider a risk-based approach to identify which advertising campaigns have a higher risk for partisanship and should be sent for external review. The approach should consider factors such as timing, audience reach, subject matter, and cost. Agreed. As part of the threshold review already underway in response to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat will complete an analysis of other factors by May 2019 and modify the current requirements for mandatory external reviews by September 2019.

Analysis of other factors.

Amendment to mandatory requirements for an external review of advertising

February–March 2020

To support the review of the current threshold for mandatory reviews of advertising creatives, TBS:

(May 2019)

  • reviewed recent GC advertising annual reports to determine the dollar-based threshold required to reach various percentages of annual GC ad budget
  • analyzed other risks factors and similar oversight approaches in other jurisdictions (for example, Australia, Ontario) to determine approaches for oversight

(June–December 2019)

  • developed options for new threshold
  • consulted with internal and external stakeholders regarding the proposed approach

(February–March 2020)

  • inform departments of changes for mandatory external reviews
  • post information on Canada.ca

Result

  • TBS reflected on the nature of risk in advertising, looking at factors such as timing, audience reach, subject matter, and cost and to what extent ad spend is a reliable indicator of the risk.
  • As foundational risk mitigation, all Government of Canada communications products and activities, including advertising must align with the Policy on Communications and Federal Identity, which includes a definition of non-partisan communications.
  • On timing, risks include those around advertising in proximity of general federal elections or advertising ahead of when authorities flowing from Parliament or negotiated international or other agreements are secured. Under the 2016 Policy on Communications and related Directive on the Management of Communications, all federal advertising must be out of market by June 30 in a year in which there is a fixed-date election. There are additional provisions for suspending advertising should a general federal election be called outside the prescribed period. The criteria for non-partisan advertising include that initiatives that require parliamentary approval or trade deals that require ratification cannot be advertised until such approvals have been received.
  • On audience reach, campaigns with larger budgets typically have a larger audience reach and, therefore, ad spend is a reasonable proxy. Earned media or earned social media is a different proposition, neither paid for, nor controlled directly, by government spending.
  • On subject matter, funding set aside for advertising is finite, and campaigns are most often funded according to their alignment with government priorities. Subject matter is also an unreliable criterion on which to assess risk. For example, the example of a so-called non-controversial campaign about handwashing cited in the AG report is seen in a different light today in the context of COVID‑19.
  • Therefore, we concluded that the amount spent on a particular campaign is the most consistent and reliable indicator of risk for the purposes of the evaluation framework.
  • In April 2020, the threshold for mandatory reviews was lowered from $500,000 to $250,000. This lower threshold would capture approximately 80% of advertising expenditures, and, as such, capture government priorities and campaigns with significant audience size. For example, in 2019–20 it would have captured 83%.
  • As added mitigation, departments have the option to send potentially sensitive ad creative for campaigns under $250,000 to Ad Standards for a review. Ad Standards has confirmed to TBS that departments do take advantage of this opportunity and these results are also posted on Canada.ca.
  • Both Australia and British Columbia have a dollar threshold at or near $250,000. TBS provided input to the British Columbia provincial government who then based their oversight process on the GC’s approach, including having Ad Standards reviewing their ads.
  • Assessing potentially controversial content is a normative exercise. Determination of sensitivity of content is best done in the context of the ad creative itself in the review of individual ads by Ad Standards.
4.43 The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat should ensure that Ad Standards documents the rationale for its assessments of government advertising campaigns against all non-partisanship review criteria. Agreed. The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat has already begun to establish a process for Ad Standards to better document the rationale used when determining whether advertising meets or does not meet the review criteria. This process will be in place by June 2019. Revised process for Ad Standards to better document rationale used in ad reviews. June 2019 (complete)

To ensure that Ad Standards better documents their rationale for determining whether advertising creatives align with the established criteria, TBS:

(May–June 2019)

  • released a new evaluation form that Ad Standards uses to assess advertising creatives and provide rationale for their determinations. It includes more detailed criteria for each of the items outlined in the definition of non-partisan communications along with new attestation requirements for heads of communications.
  • the form was developed in consultation with PSPC and Ad Standards
  • met with Ad Standards to outline expectations about documenting their findings
  • informed heads of communications and the advertising community of changes

Result

  • The evaluation form includes more detailed criteria for each of the items outlined in the definition of non-partisan communications.
  • The form is an internal tool for public servants. Departments complete a section of the form with their campaign information and are required to check off that their head of comms has attested to the information provided. This form is submitted to PSPC along with the creatives who in turn send to Ad Standards.
  • Ad Standards completes their section of the form at the initial and then final stage.
  • When a final review is complete, Ad Standards returns the form to PSPC who provide a copy to the department along with TBS.
  • TBS is responsible for posting details related to the reviews on Canada.ca.
  • On Canada.ca, the public has access to the criteria used by Ad Standards to review creatives along with a clear indication of campaigns that were reviewed and the status of determination at the initial and final stage.
  • For campaigns that did not pass an initial review, a summary of which criteria did not meet is posted.
4.46 The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat should assess the appropriateness and application of the two-step process to ensure that it is effective and meets its intended purpose. Agreed. The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat will conduct an analysis of the current two-stage process to ensure that it is achieving the intended results. Modifications will be made as required by September 2019. Analysis of the current two-stage review process with amendments, if necessary. September 2019 (complete)

To assess if the current two-stage review process is meeting its intended purpose, TBS:

(May–August 2019)

  • analyzed a sample of reviews (digital and traditional media) to determine the duration of time between initial and final reviews
  • engaged with various departments to find out at what point in the production process the creatives were submitted to Ad Standards

(September 2019)

  • completed analysis and determined amendments to the process are not required
  • posted additional guidance on Canada.ca to help departments better plan their involvement in the review process.

Result

  • Ads are reviewed twice – at an early stage of production and before being made public.
  • The two-stage process is meant to allow for changes before significant investments are made to the development of creative materials for advertising. Ad Standards provides feedback to departments within two business days, often sooner, as not to slow down the production of the ad creative.
  • Ads that include filming, hiring talent, focus testing, etc. need to be submitted for a review early in the production process – through storyboards and rough cuts for example. This allows for creatives to be reviewed and modified if needed before incurring significant costs or delays. If not done and the department must redo ad creative after receiving a partisan initial review by Ad Standards, this could mean significant costs in terms of going back into the studio, re-filming scenes for a video, rehiring voice talent to provide new audio, etc. These changes would be costly both in having to redo material, but also would cost the department fees for delays in having advertising run in media (penalties for missed deadlines).
  • Ads with low production costs such as digital or search engine marketing ads can be submitted later in the production process given changes can be made with minimal impact.
  • TBS conducted an analysis of the two-stage process, and determined that, while the duration of time between reviews varied, it is consistent with its purpose of facilitating the cost-effective production of advertising. Changes in ad content from initial to final review also validate the purpose of the process in support of non-partisan government advertising.
  • Following consultations with departments, TBS developed guidance to address inconsistencies with respect to building in enough time in their planning and production schedules to provide Ad Standards an opportunity to review and provide feedback. Guidance was then shared with heads of communications, ad managers and posted on Canada.ca.
  • All ads must pass a final review before being placed in media.
  • Results of both the initial and final review are published on Canada.ca
4.59 The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat should improve its monitoring of reviews of government advertising campaigns. The Secretariat should monitor whether Ad Standards is thoroughly and consistently applying all non-partisanship advertising review criteria in its reviews. The Secretariat should provide guidance on the interpretation and application of criteria on the basis of the findings of its monitoring activities. Agreed. The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat will enhance its internal monitoring process by establishing methodology that will assess Ad Standards’ application of the review criteria. The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat will develop necessary guidance to ensure Ad Standards consistently applies all criteria. This will be completed by September 2019.

Improved internal monitoring process.

Guidance developed to improve how Ad Standards is applying the established criteria to their reviews, if necessary.

September 2019 (complete)

To enhance internal monitoring processes, TBS:
(May–August 2019)

  • developed a methodology to assess Ad Standards reviews
  • examined a sample of Ad Standards’ reviews to assess their application of the review criteria
  • determined that no further guidance for Ad Standards is needed

Result

  • In 2018–19, TBS developed a methodology to assess Ad Standards reviews.
  • A panel was established to examine Ad Standards’ application of the criteria. The panel initially included members of TBS but in 2019–20 began to include a member of PSPC.
  • In 2019–20, the panel began assessing a sample of Ad Standards’ reviews each quarter.
  • The process includes a randomly generated sample of 25% of final submission forms for each quarter. Creatives associated with each form are reviewed against the non-partisan criteria. The panel looks at whether Ad Standards is applying criteria properly and flags any issues that may require further examination.
  • Based on the findings of the panel, Ad Standards is applying the criteria consistently in their determinations.
  • TBS meets with Ad Standards a minimum of four times each year to discuss the interpretation and application of the criteria and resulting determinations, most recently earlier this month.
  • TBS will continue to monitor Ad Standards and develop and share guidance as necessary.
4.62 The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat should ensure that there is an independent and objective process to receive, review, and respond to public complaints about partisanship in government advertising. Agreed. While the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat has not received any public complaints during the audit period, it will look at options, including the feasibility, for establishing an independent review process to address any future complaints about partisanship in government advertising. An assessment of options will be completed by December 2019.

Analysis of options for receiving, reviewing and responding to and tracking public complaints.

December 2019 (complete)

To assess the feasibility of putting in place an independent public compliant review process, TBS:

(July–December 2019)

  • undertook research and analysis of public complaint mechanisms in federal departments and other jurisdictions in Canada and abroad (for example, the United Kingdom, Australia, Ontario)
  • current avenues for Government of Canada–led advertising are Ad Standards and PSPC, but are not specific to partisan / non-partisan complaints
  • no complaints have been filed to date
  • given that TBS is not involved in decisions related to advertising planning and production, TBS will pilot an independent complaints process to assess the need for any additional mechanism informed by the volume and nature of any complaints received in 2020–21
  • information to guide the public on submitting a complaint will be available on Canada.ca

Result

  • TBS agreed that by December 2019 it would look at options, including the feasibility, for establishing an independent review process to address any future complaints about partisanship in government advertising.
  • TBS analyzed public complaints processes and found no useful models to adopt. This analysis included 27 federal institutions, all Canadian provincial and territorial governments, four international governments (Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and a selection of their provinces, states or territories.
  • No jurisdiction researched has an independent mechanism in place for dealing with public complaints about partisanship in government advertising.
  • In 2020, TBS went a step further and put in place a pilot project to accept, review and report public complaints on partisanship in GC advertising.
  • Details about how complaints can be submitted are posted on Canada.ca and have been promoted through official social media channels, including within the last month.
  • No complaints have been received to date. Should TBS receive a complaint, it will be assessed within 10 business days by a joint working group, which includes officials from TBS and PSPC.
  • Data collected from any complaints will help develop long-term options.
  • In addition to the government non-partisan complaint mechanism, the public also has the option to submit a complaint for ads they feel go against the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards, which are the standards for acceptable advertising in Canada and forms the basis for the review and evaluation of complaints from the public, and disputes between advertisers, about advertising.
  • Ad Standards received 68 complaints about government (at all levels) advertisements from 2013 to 2020. During this time, there has only been one Government of Canada ad that had complaints against the Code that was upheld by the Standards Council (EAP Jobs Grant ad).
Overview of the roles and responsibilities in the government advertising process
  • The management of government advertising is a robust system of checks and balances.
  • The process is designed to ensure that advertising activities align to the government’s priorities, comply with policies, acts and procedures, and meet the communications needs of Canadians.
  • There are clear roles and responsibilities related to the planning, approval, evaluation and reporting of advertising:
    • Privy Council Office provides leadership, strategic direction and a challenge function for government advertising activities. Departments are required to:
      • coordinate the planning of all advertising activities with the Privy Council Office (PCO), including submitting draft creative elements, media buy strategies and plans for review
      • develop pretesting and evaluation plans in consultation with PCO
      • ensure that all advertising campaigns that have a total media buy of over $1 million are evaluated using the Advertising Campaign Evaluation Tool issued by PCO
      • forward campaign performance indicators and research results to PCO
  • Cabinet approves the annual advertising plan, including the central advertising fund allocation, which is typically used to fund the majority of ad campaigns.
  • Treasury Board approves funding.
  • Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat advises departments on policy interpretation and application, monitors policy implementation and compliance, advises on the allocation and management of funds for government advertising and assesses, and advises on and processes Treasury Board submissions to release funding for approved advertising initiatives.
  • Public Services and Procurement Canada awards advertising contracts, coordinates the implementation of campaigns, manages the Agency of Record, and publishes annual expenditure reports.
Partisan determinations by Ad Standards
  • To date, Ad Standards has reviewed over 6,900 ad creatives from 120 advertising campaigns.
  • Issues within advertising creatives were flagged on 50 occasions at the initial review stage for failing to meet the advertising review criteria.
  • From 2016–17 to 2018–19, Ad Standards flagged a total of 19 issues which were primarily related to the dominant use of the colour associated with the governing party.
  • In 2020–21, Ad Standards flagged 31 issues at initial stage for reasons of accuracy, omissions of important details, or overstated claims.
    • Of the 31 issues flagged, 25 related to COVID‑19 campaigns.
  • Issues flagged included errors on rounding numbers, omitting important program information, and using overstated claims (for example, “will protect” was changed to “will help protect”).
  • The increase in issues flagged may be attributed in part to significant pressure to quickly develop COVID‑19 messaging in an evolving public health crisis.
  • In response to the serious and urgent need to get public health messaging in market, Ad Standards provided review findings within hours and in some cases, on weekends, thus significantly shortening the two-business day review time allowed for in the contract.
Ad Standards
  • Not-for-profit organization responsible for administering the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards, which sets the criteria for acceptable advertising in Canada
  • Since 2016 has been under contract with the Government of Canada to conduct independent reviews of government advertising
  • To date, Ad Standards has reviewed over 6,900 creatives from 120 advertising campaigns on topics related to COVID‑19, recruitment, health issues, and economic action.
  • Ad Standards has extensive experience reviewing advertising against legislative and regulatory requirements through their fee-based pre-clearance service for Canadian industry in the following areas: alcoholic beverages, children’s advertising, cosmetics, food and non-alcoholic beverages and health products.
  • The government has committed to ensuring that advertising continues to be reviewed by an independent third party until such time as a permanent mechanism is in place.
Contract values
  • 2016–17: $65,000 (plus Harmonized Sales Tax (HST))
  • 2017–18: $72,916 (plus HST)
  • 2018–19: $87,500 (plus HST)
  • 2019–20: $87,500 (plus HST)
  • 2020–21: $199,500 (plus HST) – increase based on projected additional workload as a result of the threshold being lowered from $500,000 to $250,000.

4. Status of the Auditor General’s recommendations

Issue

What has TBS done to address the Auditor General’s recommendations?

Key facts

  • TBS has addressed all recommendations of the Auditor General.
  • The measures put in place in response to the recommendations have helped ensure that the advertising oversight mechanism continues to meet its original objectives.

Response

  • We have addressed all recommendations outlined in the 2019 Spring Reports of the Auditor General of Canada, which includes:
    • analyzing factors and modifying the requirements for mandatory external reviews which resulted in a lower-dollar-value threshold
    • establishing a process to ensure that Ad Standards better documents the rationale used when assessing advertising creatives
    • assessing the two-stage review process to determine whether it is meeting its intended purpose
    • enhancing the internal monitoring process to ensure Ad Standards consistently applies all criteria
    • looking at options, including the feasibility, for establishing an independent review process to address complaints from the public of partisanship in GC advertising

Background

In the 2019 spring reports to Parliament, the Auditor General recommended that TBS:

(1) consider a risk-based approach to identify campaigns with higher risk for partisanship (consider factors such as timing, audience reach, subject matter and cost).

  • Following an analysis of various dollar-based thresholds as well as a review of other advertising processes used by provincial and international governments, it was determined that a consistent dollar-based target would be the best approach.
  • The threshold for mandatory reviews was reduced from $500,000 to $250,000 to capture a minimum of 80% of the annual advertising budget and all significant campaigns.

(2) ensure Ad Standards documents the rationale for its assessments of government advertising campaigns against all non-partisan review criteria.

  • TBS developed a new evaluation form that Ad Standards uses to assess creatives and provide feedback.
  • The evaluation form includes more detailed criteria (10-point checklist) for each of the items outlined in the definition of non-partisan communications along with new attestation requirements for heads of communications.

(3) assess the appropriateness and application of the two-step process to ensure that it is effective and meets its intended purpose.

  • TBS consulted with key departments to gather information related to the period of time between initial and final reviews.
  • It was determined that depending on the type of media used in the advertising, the period time between reviews was fluctuated; for example, digital ads versus television.
  • Based on the findings, the process did not need to be changed. However, guidance was developed to help departments better plan the timing of their review requests to Ad Standards. The guidance was shared with heads of communications, ad managers and posted on Canada.ca.

(4) improve its monitoring of reviews of ad campaigns, and whether Ad Standards is thoroughly and consistently applying all the non-partisan criteria in its reviews. TBS should provide guidance on the interpretation and application of criteria on the basis of the findings of its monitoring activities.

  • In 2018–19, TBS developed a methodology to assess Ad Standards reviews.
  • A panel was established to examine Ad Standards’ application of the criteria. The panel initially included members of TBS but in 2019–20 began to include a member of PSPC.
  • In 2019–20, the panel began assessing a sample of Ad Standards’ reviews each quarter.
  • As part of the review, TBS confirmed that reviews were completed within the period specified in the contract, which is currently two business days. Based on the findings of the panel, Ad Standards is applying the criteria consistently in their determinations.
  • TBS meets with Ad Standards a minimum of four times each year to discuss the interpretation and application of the criteria and resulting determinations.
  • TBS will continue to monitor Ad Standards and develop and share guidance as necessary

(5) ensure that there is an independent and objective process to receive, review, and respond to public complaints about partisanship in government advertising.

  • TBS agreed that by December 2019 it would look at options, including the feasibility, for establishing an independent review process to address any future complaints about partisanship in government advertising.
  • In 2020, TBS went a step further and put in place a pilot project to accept, review and report public complaints on partisanship in GC advertising.
  • Details about how complaints can be submitted are posted on Canada.ca and have been promoted through official social media channels.
  • No complaints have been received to date.
  • Data collected from the pilot project will help develop long-term options.

5. Advertising campaigns for COVID‑19

Issue

The government use of advertising campaigns to support the response to the COVID‑19 pandemic.

Key facts

  • Starting in March 2020, national advertising campaigns were launched to inform Canadians about measures that the GC was undertaking in the fight against COVID‑19.
  • To date, approximately $70.4 million has been allocated to advertising in support of the government’s response to the COVID‑19 pandemic.
  • Since March 2020, Ad Standards has reviewed 990 ad creatives related to COVID‑19, and 26 issues have been flagged at the initial review stage for failing to meet the established criteria.

Response

  • Throughout the pandemic, the Government of Canada has used paid advertising to increase awareness of public health measures and important GC programs and services available to support Canadians through this unprecedented time.
  • Advertising is playing an important role in our response to COVID‑19 as a tool to provide timely and evidence-informed information to the public.
  • Since the beginning of the pandemic, 990 creatives related to the COVID‑19 response have been reviewed through the GC’s independent review mechanism.
  • Since April 2020, six COVID‑19 advertising campaigns were released to the public:
    • COVID‑19 Emergency Response Plan (Finance Canada)
    • Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) and essential services / jobs banks (Employment and Social Development Canada)
    • Coronavirus public education and COVID Alert App (Health Canada / Public Health Agency of Canada)
    • Travel and border information (Global Affairs Canada)
  • The ads were placed in a variety of digital and traditional media platforms, including social media, web, print, radio and television.

Background

In March 2020, with the arrival of the COVID‑19 pandemic, the Public Health Agency of Canada launched a national advertising campaign to inform Canadians about measures the government was undertaking during these unprecedented times.

Since April 2020, six COVID‑19 campaigns have been launched:

  • COVID‑19 Emergency Response Plan (Finance Canada)
  • Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) and essential services / jobs banks (Employment and Social Development Canada)
  • Coronavirus public education and COVID Alert App (Health Canada / Public Health Agency of Canada)
  • Travel and border information (Global Affairs Canada)

COVID‑19 advertising occurs on a variety of digital and traditional media platforms, including social media, web, print, radio, and television.

6. Overview of the Committee

Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP)

Mandate of the Committee

When the Speaker tables a report by the Auditor General in the House of Commons, it is automatically referred to the Public Accounts Committee. The Committee selects the chapters of the report it wants to study and calls the Auditor General and senior public servants from the audited organizations to appear before it to respond to the Office of the Auditor General’s findings. The Committee also reviews the federal government’s consolidated financial statements – the Public Accounts of Canada – and examines financial and/or accounting shortcomings raised by the Auditor General. At the conclusion of a study, the Committee may present a report to the House of Commons that includes recommendations to the government for improvements in administrative and financial practices and controls of federal departments and agencies.

Government policy, and the extent to which policy objectives are achieved, are generally not examined by the Public Accounts Committee. Instead, the Committee focuses on government administration – the economy and efficiency of program delivery as well as the adherence to government policies, directives and standards. The Committee seeks to hold the government to account for effective public administration and due regard for public funds.

Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3) of the House of Commons, the mandate of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts is to review and report on:

  • the Public Accounts of Canada
  • all reports of the Auditor General of Canada
  • the Office of the Auditor General’s Departmental Plan and Departmental Results Report
  • any other matter that the House of Commons shall, from time to time, refer to the Committee

The Committee also reviews:

  • the federal government’s consolidated financial statements
  • the Public Accounts of Canada
  • makes recommendations to the government for improvements in spending practices
  • considers the Estimates of the Office of the Auditor General
Other responsibilities
  • The economy, efficiency and effectiveness of government administration
  • The quality of administrative practices in the delivery of federal programs
  • Government’s accountability to Parliament with regard to federal spending
Committee members
Chair
  • Kelly Block
    Conservative
    Carlton Trail–Eagle Creek
    PACP member and Chair since October 2020

Vice-Chair
  • Lloyd Longfield
    Liberal
    Guelph
    PACP member and Vice-Chair since February 2020

  • Maxime Blanchette-Joncas
    Bloc Québécois
    Rimouski-Neigette–Témiscouata–Les Basques
    PACP member and Vice-Chair since February 2020 Public Accounts Critic

Members
  • Luc Berthold
    Conservative
    Mégantic–L’Érable
    PACP member since October 2020 TBS Critic

  • Philip Lawrence
    Conservative
    Northumberland–Peterborough South
    PACP member since October 2020 National Revenue Critic

  • Len Webber
    Conservative
    Calgary Confederation
    PACP member since October 2020

  • Matthew Green
    New Democratic Party
    Hamilton Centre
    PACP member since February 2020 TBS Critic

  • Kody Blois
    Liberal
    Kings–Hants
    PACP member since February 2020

  • Greg Fergus
    Liberal
    Hull–Alymer
    PACP member since May 2019 Parliamentary Secretary TBS and Digital Government

  • Francesco Sorbara
    Liberal
    Vaughan–Woodbridge
    PACP member since February 2020

  • Jean Yip
    Liberal
    Scarborough–Agincourt
    PACP member since January 2018

2019 Spring Reports of the Auditor General of Canada: Report 4 – Oversight of Government of Canada Advertising

Meeting summaries
43rd Parliament

There have been no prior meetings on the subject of advertising since 2019.

2nd session

As of January 28, 2021, there have been 15 meetings of the committee.

On January 26, 2020, the Comptroller General appeared along with the Deputy Minister of Finance, and the Auditor General on the Public Accounts of Canada 2020.

  • The tone was cordial, and members stayed on topic.

1st session

There were 5 meetings of the committee.

On March 12, 2020, officials from the Office of the Comptroller General provided the committee with a general briefing.

42nd Parliament

There were 10 meetings of the committee since the initial meeting on the spring 2019 reports with the committee (details below).

On May 30, 2019, the GC Chief Information Officer appeared alongside the President of Shared Services Canada, and other Deputy Ministers from Employment and Social Development Canada, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, and Veteran’s Affairs Canada, with the Auditor General on Report 1 – Call Centres of the 2019 spring reports.

Thursday, May 9, 2019: 2019 Spring Reports of the Auditor General of Canada (Office of the Auditor General) – overview of report

Mr. Ricard, the Interim Auditor General of Canada, discussed the overview of each report in the 2019 spring reports. In Report 4, Mr. Ricard discussed that government has a policy that requires all communications to be non-partisan. The government has put a review mechanism in place to avoid partisan advertising. However, the money threshold is the only factor that determines whether or not the campaign is reviewed externally or internally. The Office of the Auditor General of Canada believes that the subject matter and the aim of the campaign should also be considered.

Interest in TBS/Minister of Digital Government Portfolio

Conservative
  • Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates (OGGO) June 16, 2020: Supplementary Estimates (A) 2020–21 – Members had specific questions for PCO and Treasury Board officials about the breakdown in the funding requested for PCO advertising related to COVID‑19 – Mr. Kelly McCauley (Edmonton West) and Ms. Kelly Block (Carlton Trail–Eagle Creek)
Liberal
  • Nil
Bloc Québécois
  • Nil
New Democratic Party
  • (OGGO) June 16, 2020: Supplementary Estimates (A) 2020–21: Members had specific questions for PCO and Treasury Board officials about the breakdown in the funding requested for PCO advertising related to COVID‑19 – Mr. Matthew Green (Hamilton Centre) and Mr. Daniel Blaikie (Elmwood–Transcona)
  • (PACP) May 9, 2019: 2019 Spring Reports of the Auditor General of Canada (Auditor General): Commented on the issue of there not being enough documentation to assess the rigour of assessments being done by the government to ensure public funds were not spent on partisan advertising – Mr. David Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) and the Interim Auditor General of Canada

Other relevant parliamentary activity

  • The spring 2019 reports of the Auditor General of Canada were tabled in the House of Commons on May 7, 2019.
  • The Public Accounts Committee studied 3 out of 5 of the Reports in June 2019, including Report 1, Call Centres. The Chief Information Office of Canada appeared in regard to Report 1 on May 30, 2019, with the Auditor General of Canada and Deputy Heads from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, Employment and Social Development Canada, Veterans Affairs Canada and Shared Services Canada. Canada Border Services Agency appeared on Report 3 on December 3, 2020.
  • The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat submitted the Management Action Plan in response to Report 4, Oversight of Government of Canada Advertising to the PACP Committee Winter 2020 after the 43rd federal election, as well as an updated plan in February 2021.

Kelly Block (Saskatchewan: Carlton Trail–Eagle Creek): Conservative (Chair)

Kelly Block
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament in 2015 for Carlton Trail–Eagle Creek, previously for Saskatoon–Rosetown–Biggar from 2008 to 2015
  • Served as vice-chair on the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities in the 42nd Parliament.
  • Member of the Liaison Standing Committee.
  • Previous member of the Standing Committee of Government Operations and Estimates in the 43rd and 41st Parliament, the Standing Committee of Finance in the 40th Parliament.
  • Served as the Opposition critic for Public Services and Procurement Canada (appointed by Andrew Scheer).
  • Prior to her election, Mrs. Block served two terms as the first female mayor of Waldheim, Saskatchewan, as chairperson of the Gabriel Springs Health District, and was awarded the Maclean’s Parliamentarian of the Year – Rising Star – Award in June 2010.

Lloyd Longfield (Ontario: Guelph), Liberal (First Vice-Chair)

Lloyd Longfield
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Guelph in 2015.
  • Former member of the Public Accounts Committee (PACP) in the 43rd Parliament and is a standing member of the Environment and Sustainable Development Committee (ENVI).
  • Former Executive Director of the Guelph Chamber of Commerce, and former business executive.

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas (Quebec: Rimouski-Neigette–Témiscouata–Les Basques): Bloc Québécois (Second Vice-Chair)

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for Rimouski-Neigette–Témiscouata–Les Basques in the 2019 federal election.
  • Bloc Québécois Critic for Public Accounts.
  • Preceded in his riding by Guy Caron who served as the leader of the New Democratic Party (NDP) from 2017 to 2019.
  • Business Administration graduate from the University of Quebec at Rimouski and former administrative officer at the Business Development Bank of Canada.
  • Was regional president of the Youth Forum of the Bloc Québécois.

Luc Berthold (Québec: Mégantic–L’Érable), Conservative (member)

Luc Berthold
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for Mégantic–L’Érable in 2015.
  • Critic for Treasury Board.
  • Previously the Vice-Chair of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, and the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food.
  • Prior to his election, Mr. Berthold was Nathalie Normandeau’s Political Assistant, and communications advisor for the Leader of the Official Opposition in 1999, the Interim Director of communications for Quebec’s Liberal Party in 2006, and worked as a speaker, coach and gave leadership training sessions.

Philip Lawrence (Ontario: Northumberland–Peterborough South): Conservative (member)

Philip Lawrence
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Northumberland–Peterborough South in the 2019 federal election.
  • Shadow Minister of National Revenue.
  • Former member of Standing Committee of Justice and Human Rights.
  • Prior to his election, Mr. Lawrence received his BA from Brock University in Political Science, he attended Osgoode Hall Law School and the Schulich School of Business to obtain his law degree and master’s of business administration, and volunteered at the Financial Planning Standards Council.

Len Webber (Alberta: Calgary Confederation): Conservative (member)

Len Webber
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Calgary Confederation in 2015.
  • Former Vice-Chair of the Standing Committee on Health in the 42nd Parliament.
  • Previously a member on the Standing Committee on Health, the Subcommittee on Sports-Related Concussions in Canada of the Standing Committee on Health and the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure of the Standing Committee on Health.
  • Prior to his election, Mr. Webber was a Member of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta, representing the constituency of Calgary–Foothills from 2004 to 2014, work as an apprentice electrician and managed his own contracting company for 10 years, and served as vice president and director of the Webber Academy, a private, non-profit school in southwest Calgary for children from junior kindergarten to Grade 12 founded by his father.

Matthew Green (Ontario: Hamilton Centre): NDP (member)

Matthew Green
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for Hamilton Centre in the 2019 federal election in the riding formerly held by NDP Member of Parliament David Christopherson.
  • NDP Critic for National Revenue / Canada Revenue Agency, Public Services and Procurement Canada.
  • Former Councillor for the City of Hamilton (2014 to 2018).
  • Member of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP), the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates (OGGO), and the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates.
  • Member of the Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association (CAAF) and the Canadian Section of ParlAmericas (CPAM).

Kody Blois (Nova Scotia: Kings–Hants): Liberal (member)

Kody Blois
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Kings–Hants in the 2019 federal election, in the riding formerly held by former TBS President Scott Brison.
  • Current member of the Standing Committee for Agriculture and Agri-Food, and the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food.
  • Former member of the Standing Committee for Agriculture and Agri-Food, and the Standing Committee on Public Accounts.
  • Blois completed degrees in commerce, law, and public administration, which sparked his interest in serving his community.

Greg Fergus (Québec: Hull–Alymer): Liberal (member), Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board and Minister of Digital Government

Greg Fergus
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Hull–Aylmer in 2015.
  • Member of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics.
  • Former member of the Standing Committee on Finance, and the Standing Committee on Public Accounts.
  • Current and Former Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board and Minister of Digital Government. Former Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development.
  • Former National Director of the Liberal Party of Canada and former political staffer in various ministerial offices.

Francesco Sorbara (Ontario: Vaughan–Woodbridge): Liberal (member)

Francesco Sorbara
  • Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Vaughan–Woodbridge in 2015.
  • Member of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics.
  • Former member of the Standing Committee on Finance, as well as the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure of the Standing Committee on Finance, and the Standing Committee on Public Accounts.
  • Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Revenue.
  • Sorbara is a chartered financial analyst and worked in the global financial markets for nearly 20 years in both Canada and the United States for Scotiabank, JPMorgan Chase, and global credit rating agency DBRS.

Jean Yip (Ontario: Scarborough–Agincourt): Liberal (member)

Jean Yip
  • First elected in a by-election on December 11, 2017, as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Scarborough–Agincourt. Elected in 2019 as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Scarborough–Agincourt.
  • Current member of the Special Committee on Canada-China Relations.
  • Former member of the Public Accounts Committee, and the Government Operations and Estimates Committee.

Overview of advertising

7. Policy on Communications and Federal Identity

Issue

The Policy on Communications and Federal Identity sets the context and rules for how the Government of Canada (GC) enables communication with the public about policies, programs, services and initiatives, including the administration of the GC’s official symbols.

Key facts

  • A priority outlined in the 2015 mandate letter to the President of the Treasury Board was to modernize the Policy on Communications and Federal Identity for the digital environment.
  • In May 2016, Treasury Board released the Policy on Communications and Federal Identity and its supporting instruments.
  • The communications and federal identity policy instruments apply to approximately 90 departments and agencies.
  • The policy and its support instruments do not apply to Crown corporations such as Canada Post, VIA Rail and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.

Response

  • The Policy on Communications and Federal Identity sets out rules for how the Government of Canada enables communications with the public about policies, programs, services and initiatives.
  • The policy was modernized in 2016 to keep pace with how the public communicates in an ever-changing environment, and, more specifically, meet the expectations of more and more Canadians to communicate online.
  • The policy and its supporting instruments reinforce our continued shift to modernize the way we communicate in the digital age and improve transparency and accountability to Canadians.
  • The policy also strengthened oversight of federal government advertising and, for the first time ever, introduced a clear definition of non-partisan communications.

Background

The Policy on Communications and Federal Identity and the Directive on the Management of Communications apply to departments and other portions of the federal public administration as set out in Schedules I, I.1 and II of the Financial Administration Act, unless excluded by specific acts, regulations or orders in council.

  • The objectives of the policy are to ensure the following:
    • Government of Canada communications are non-partisan, effectively managed, well coordinated, clear and responsive to the diverse information needs of the public.
    • The Government of Canada considers the views and interests of the public when developing policies, programs, services and initiatives.
    • The Government of Canada is visible and recognizable to the public in Canada and abroad and is projected equally in both official languages.

8. Definition of advertising and non-partisan communications

Issue

A definition of non-partisan communications was established to ensure government communications products and activities, including advertising, were non-partisan.

Key facts

  • Non-partisan communications were defined for the first time in the 2016 Policy on Communications and Federal Identity.
  • Advertising has been defined in the policy since 2006.

Response

  • Government of Canada advertising is defined in the policy as: any message conveyed in Canada or abroad and paid for by the government for placement in media, including but not limited to newspapers, television, radio, cinema, billboards and other out-of-home media, mobile devices, the Internet, and any other digital medium.
  • In 2016, the Policy on Communications and Federal Identity introduced, for the first time ever, a definition of non-partisan communications for government communications products and activities.
  • “Non-partisan communications” is defined as:
    • objective, factual and explanatory
    • free from political party slogans, images, identifiers; bias; designation; or affiliation
    • the primary colour associated with the governing party is not used in a dominant way, unless an item is commonly depicted in that colour
    • advertising is devoid of any name, voice or image of a minister, member of Parliament or senator

Background

The definition of non-partisan communications was developed to ensure government communications products and activities were not deemed or perceived to be partisan.

Prior to releasing the 2016 Policy on Communications and Federal Identity, the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat undertook significant consultations with heads of communications and functional specialists across government.

TBS also worked closely with the Privy Council Office to establish the definition of non-partisan communications.

9. Role of Government of Canada advertising

Issue

The Government of Canada uses advertising to inform Canadians of its programs, services, policy and decisions.

Key facts

  • Advertising is used to inform Canadians about:
    • their rights and responsibilities
    • initiatives and services available to them
    • the dangers or risks to public health, safety, or the environment
  • Advertising campaigns are typically supported by communications products and activities such as social media, announcements, websites.

Response

  • Advertising is used to inform Canadians about policies, programs, services and initiatives; their rights and responsibilities; and the risks to public health, safety, and the environment.
  • The government uses a variety of digital and traditional forms of media to reach and engage with Canadians effectively and efficiently, regardless of where they reside. These can include television, web, social media, print, and radio.
  • Government advertising campaigns are always supported by non-paid communications tactics which can include blogging, newsletters, press releases, and responding to journalist enquiries.
  • The government’s advertising activities are aligned to government priorities, for example the COVID‑19 response, recruitment, and economic action.

10. Roles and responsibilities of departments and central agencies in the government advertising process

Issue

An overview of the roles and responsibilities of departments and central agencies in the government advertising process.

Key facts

  • PCO works with departments to develop and oversee the overall GC advertising plan that supports government priorities.
  • TBS provides advice and interpretations about mandatory policy requirements and procedures for advertising, including the advertising oversight mechanism.
  • PSPC manages the contract with the Agency of Record who is responsible for the planning and purchasing of media space on behalf of the GC.
  • Departments are responsible and accountable for their advertising activities.

Response

  • The management of government advertising is a robust system of checks and balances.
  • The process is designed to ensure that advertising activities align to the government’s priorities, comply with policies, acts and procedures, and meet the communications needs of Canadians.
  • There are clear roles and responsibilities related to the planning, approval, evaluation and reporting of advertising:
    • Privy Council Office provides leadership, strategic direction and a challenge function for coordinating government advertising activities.
    • Cabinet approves the annual advertising plan, including the central advertising fund allocations, which are typically used to fund the majority of ad campaigns.
    • Treasury Board approves funding.
    • Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat advises departments on policy interpretation and application, monitors policy implementation and compliance, advises on the allocation and management of funds for government advertising, and assesses, advises and processes Treasury Board submissions to release funding for approved advertising initiatives.
    • Public Services and Procurement Canada awards advertising contracts, coordinates the implementation of campaigns, manages the Agency of Record, and publishes annual expenditure reports.

Background

The Government of Canada advertising process involves many stakeholders and is designed to ensure that advertising activities align with government priorities, comply with policies, acts, and procedures, and meet the expectations and needs of Canadians.

Departments are responsible and accountable for their advertising activities.

The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat regularly meets with departments to ensure that they understand the advertising process, policy requirements, as well as advise on the allocation and management of funds for government advertising initiatives.

Every year, departments and agencies work with the Privy Council Office to develop their advertising plans that support the priorities identified in the Speech from the Throne and the Budget.

Once the plans are approved by Cabinet, they are submitted to the Treasury Board for funding approval.

Public Services and Procurement Canada works with departments and agencies to implement their campaigns, award advertising contracts, manage the Agency of Record, and publish the Annual Report on Government of Canada Advertising Activities.

Privy Council Office provides leadership and strategic direction on advertising activities throughout the government advertising process.

11. Overview of Government of Canada advertising

Issue

Overview of Government of Canada advertising.

Key facts

  • Funding for advertising activities can come from the Central Advertising Fund or from departmental reference levels.
  • Advertising expenditures vary from year to year.
  • Government advertising campaigns are managed by individual departments.
  • Departments are responsible for the choice of media used in advertising, which is based on campaign objectives, target audience, timing and budget.
  • PSPC publishes the Annual Report on Government of Canada Advertising Activities.

Response

  • Advertising has been an essential part of the Government of Canada’s response to the pandemic as Canadians rely on our government to provide them with important information and updates about new government programs and services.
  • As well, during times of crisis, advertising is used to inform Canadians of public health guidance in order to protect the health and safety of all citizens.
  • The Government of Canada manages advertising expenditures in a cost-effective manner, ensuring value for money, and with a focus on results.
  • Departments are responsible for managing their advertising campaign budgets, including the choice of media, which is determined based on campaign objectives, target audience, timing and budget. The use of digital advertising has grown in recent years as more Canadians access information online and has become an effective way to reach specific audiences regardless of their location.
  • The Government of Canada continues to balance the use of digital and traditional media in its advertising to meet the diverse information needs of the public.

Background

Public Services and Procurement Canada publishes the Government of Canada advertising annual report, which summarizes government-wide advertising activities.

12. PSPC’s annual report on Government of Canada advertising (2019–20)

[Redacted: The content of this section is published material and can be viewed at : 2019 to 2020 Annual Report on Government of Canada Advertising Activities]

External oversight process for advertising

13. Non-partisan advertising oversight process

Issue

An overview of the non-partisan advertising oversight process.

Key facts

  • The external advertising oversight process has been in place since 2016.
  • The threshold for mandatory reviews was originally $500,000 and lowered to $250,000 in April 2020.
  • Departments may choose to voluntarily submit campaigns under $250,000 for review.
  • Ad Standards has been under contract with TBS since 2016.
  • To date, Ad Standards has reviewed creatives from 120 advertising campaigns on topics related to COVID‑19, recruitment, health issues, and economic action.
  • Ads must pass a final review before they are placed in media.
  • All review results are posted on Canada.ca.
  • TBS is the policy authority under which the oversight mechanism and the definition of non-partisan communications have been established.

Response

  • In 2016, the Government of Canada put in place an external oversight mechanism to ensure that government advertising meets the advertising review criteria, which are based on the definition of “non-partisan communications” as outlined in the Policy on Communications and Federal Identity.
  • Ad Standards, the not-for-profit organization responsible for administering the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards, has been under contract with the Government of Canada since 2016 to conduct independent reviews of government advertising.
  • In response to a recommendation from the Auditor General, the threshold for mandatory reviews of advertising was lowered from $500,000 to $250,000 effective April 1, 2020.
  • Ads are reviewed at two stages. The initial review examines preliminary versions of departmental advertisements before the department incurs additional costs for the development of the creatives.
  • All ads have passed a final review by Ad Standards before being placed in media.

Background

Ad Standards has extensive experience reviewing advertising against legislative and regulatory requirements through their fee-based pre-clearance service for Canadian industry in the following areas: alcoholic beverages, children’s advertising, cosmetics, food and non-alcoholic beverages, and health products.

Ad Standards reviews creatives against the established criteria and provides departments with their determinations.

Departments are responsible for ensuring that all campaigns are non-partisan.

In addition to coordinating the ad review process, PSPC provides advisory services and technical advice with respect to legislative and policy requirements for advertising.

PSPC coordinates the review process with Ad Standards on behalf of departments and is responsible for notifying TBS if a department disregards a review determination from Ad Standards.

14. Ad Standards

Issue

Role of Ad Standards in Government of Canada non-partisan advertising review process.

Key facts

  • A priority outlined in the 2015 mandate letter to the President of the Treasury Board was to strengthen oversight on government advertising.
  • In May 2016, TBS put in place an external oversight mechanism for government advertising campaigns over $500,000. The threshold was lowered to $250,000 effective April 1, 2020.
  • Ad Standards has been under contract with TBS since 2016 when the mechanism was first introduced.
  • Ad Standards is ideally suited for this role as they have been providing pre-clearance against the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards for Canadian industry for over 30 years.

Response

  • Ad Standards, the not-for-profit organization responsible for administering the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards, has been under contract with the Government of Canada since 2016 to conduct independent reviews of government advertising.
  • To date, Ad Standards has reviewed over 6,900 creatives from 120 advertising campaigns on topics related to COVID‑19, recruitment, health issues, and economic action.
  • The threshold for mandatory reviews of advertising was lowered from $500,000 to $250,000 effective April 1, 2020.
  • Ad Standards assesses Government of Canada advertising materials at both the initial and final review stages.

Background

Ad Standards was created in 1957. They are the national not-for-profit organization that administers the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards, which sets the criteria for acceptable advertising in Canada.

Ad Standards has extensive experience reviewing advertising against legislative and regulatory requirements through their fee-based pre-clearance service for Canadian industry in the following areas: alcoholic beverages, children’s advertising, cosmetics, food and non-alcoholic beverages, and health products.

Ad Standards has been under contract with TBS since 2016 when the mechanism was first introduced.

  • 2016–17: $65,000 (plus HST)
  • 2017–18: $72,916 (plus HST)
  • 2018–19: $87,500 (plus HST)
  • 2019–20: $87,500 (plus HST)
  • 2020–21: $199,500 (plus HST)

A sole-source contract was issued in 2016–17. TBS issued an Advance Contract Award Notice (ACAN) prior to awarding Ad Standards a contract for fiscal years 2017–18 to 2019–20. A separate ACAN was issued for fiscal years 2020–21 to 2023–24.

In 2020–21, the contract value increased based on the additional workload that is projected as a result of the threshold being lowered from $500,000 to $250,000.

The government has committed to ensuring that advertising continues to be reviewed by an independent third party until such time as a permanent mechanism is in place.

15. Advertising campaigns reviewed by Ad Standards

Issue

Advertising campaigns have been reviewed by Ad Standards since 2016.

Key facts

  • To date, Ad Standards has reviewed over 6,900 ad creatives from 120 advertising campaigns.
  • Issues within advertising creatives were flagged on 50 occasions at the initial review stage for failing to meet the advertising review criteria.
  • From 2016–17 to 2018–19, Ad Standards flagged a total of 19 issues which were primarily related to the dominant use of the colour associated with the governing party.
  • In 2020–21, Ad Standards flagged 31 issues for reasons of accuracy, omissions of important details, or overstated claims. Of the 31 issues flagged, 25 related to COVID‑19.
  • The increase in the number issues flagged this year can be attributed in part to the increased pressure on departments to develop creatives related to the current public health crisis.

Response

  • The Government of Canada’s advertising review process was introduced in 2016.
  • The oversight process ensures Canadians receive information that is objective, factual and non-partisan.
  • Advertisements that are the subject to a review are assessed against a set of criteria.
  • Following the Auditor General’s recommendations in the spring 2019 reports, we made several changes, including reducing the dollar-value threshold for mandatory reviews, analyzing the two-stage process and introducing a public complaints pilot project. Furthermore, a process was established to ensure Ad Standards applies criteria consistently and better documents their findings.
  • The initial review stage provides departments with an opportunity to make modifications based on Ad Standards’ feedback. Ads must pass a final review before they are permitted to be placed in media.
  • To date, Ad Standards has reviewed 120 advertising campaigns with over 6,900 different ad creatives on topics such as COVID‑19, recruitment, health issues, tax credits, etc.
  • TBS officials continue to regularly meet with officials in departments to ensure that they understand the advertising review process as well as requirements outlined in the review submission form.

Background

From April 1 to December 31, 2020, a total of 1,938 creatives from 21 campaigns were reviewed:

  • 31 issues were flagged at the initial stage for not meeting review criteria; 25 pertained to COVID‑19 advertising campaigns.
  • Issues flagged included errors on rounding numbers, omitting important program information, and using overstated claims (for example, “will protect” was changed to “will help protect”).
  • The increase in issues flagged can be attributed in part to significant pressure to quickly develop COVID‑19 messaging in an evolving public health crisis.
  • In response to the serious and urgent need to get public health messaging in market, Ad Standards provided review findings within hours and in some cases, on weekends, thus significantly shortening the two-business day review time allowed for in the contract.

In 2019–20:

  • 1,808 creatives from 33 campaigns were reviewed
  • 3 issues flagged (accuracy of the message)

In 2018–19:

  • 1,542 creatives from 36 campaigns were reviewed
  • 8 issues flagged (both accuracy of message, and dominant use of the colour associated with the governing party)

In 2017–18:

  • 1,022 creatives from 15 campaigns were reviewed
  • 3 issues flagged (dominant use of the colour associated with the governing party)

In 2016–17:

  • 598 creatives from 15 campaigns were reviewed
  • 5 issues flagged (dominant use of the colour associated with the governing party)

16. Advertising expenditures 2017–18 to 2019–20

Issue

Government of Canada advertising expenditures.

Key facts

Advertising expenditures as published in the Annual Report on Government of Canada Advertising Activities
Fiscal year Total expenditures (includes production and media) Items of note
2019–20 $50.1 million
  • Advertising activities ceased on June 30 prior to the October election.
  • In March 2020, advertising was launched to inform Canadians about the GC’s response to COVID‑19.
2018–19 $58.6 million Not applicable
2017–18 $39.2 million Not applicable
Media expenditures by media type
Fiscal year Total media expenditures TV Digital/Internettable 1 note * Radio, print and out-of-hometable 1 note **
2019–20 $44.86 million $11.74 million (26%) $24.71 million (55%) $8.41 million (18%)
2018–19 $43.04 million $13.58 million (31%) $22.93 million (53%) $6.54 million (16%)
2017–18 $27.76 million $4.47 million (16%) $18.15 million (65%) $5.14 million (18%)

Table 1 Notes

Table 1 Note 1

Digital/Internet encompasses Internet tactics such as social media, website advertising and search engine marketing such as text ads on Google.

Return to table 1 note * referrer

Table 1 Note 2

Out-of-home encompasses advertising in various media such as billboards, signs, in-transit areas like airports or train stations, cinema.

Return to table 1 note ** referrer

Social media breakdown
Fiscal year Total social mediaexpenditures Facebook/Instagram Twitter Snapchat LinkedIn
2019–20 $8.56 million $5.84 million (68%) $1.12 million (13%) $0.92 million (11%) $0.67 million (8%)
2018–19 $7.62 million $5.40 million (71%) $0.84 million (11%) $0.57 million (7%) $0.81 million (11%)
2017–18 $7.76 million $5.68 million (73%) $0.94 million (12%) $0.41 million (5%) $0.72 million (9%)
Top 10 advertising departments in 2019–20

Total advertising expenditures for the institutions below ($43.06 million) make up for 86% of the total GC advertising expenditures ($50.10 million).

Total  advertising expenditures for the institutions. Text version below:
Figure 1 - Text version
Top 10 advertising departments in 2019–20
Health Canada $14,459,708
Public Health Agency of Canada $6,115,104
Veterans Affairs Canada $4,839,923
National Defence $4,217,863
Economic and Social Development Canada $4,129,867
Parks Canada $2,977,741
Canada Revenue Agency $1,908,307
Global Affairs Canada $1,571,081
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada $1,492,105
Environment and Climate Change Canada $1,352,114

Response

  • The Government of Canada manages advertising expenditures in a cost-effective manner, ensuring value for money, and with a focus on results.
  • Departments are responsible for managing their advertising campaign budgets, including the choice of media, which is determined based on campaign objectives, target audience, timing and budget. The use of digital advertising has grown in recent years as more Canadians access information online and has become an effective way to reach specific audiences regardless of their location.

Page details

Date modified: