Audit of Canadian Armed Forces Relocation Services

December 2024

1259-3-0096 (ADM(RS))

Reviewed by ADM(RS) in accordance with the Access to Information Act. Information UNCLASSIFIED.

Table 1. Key Findings and Recommendations.
Key Findings Recommendations

Finding 1:
There are opportunities to improve efficiency within the CAF Relocation Program.

Recommendation 1:
CMP should create a single internal source of information for relevant guidance, including standard operating procedures (SOP), references, lessons learned and hyperlinks. This information should be formally communicated to new and relocating CAF members.

OPI: CMP

Finding 2:
CAF members are receiving required relocation services, but the CAF Relocation Program is not meeting their needs.

Recommendation 2:
CMP should conduct additional analysis on the CAF Relocation Program to determine member needs and expectations. This analysis should inform future policy and contracting updates to ensure that the program meets the needs and requirements of CAF members and their families.

OPI: CMP

Finding 3:
Mechanisms are in place to support the monitoring and oversight of the CAF Relocation Program and contract.

N/A
Table 1 Summary

The left column contains the list of key findings, and the right column contains the associated recommendations. Read the columns from left to right.


Back to Table of Contents

Background

The CAF relocates its members within Canada and abroad to meet operational and development needs. CAF members are relocated for: 

Relocations can present CAF members with major changes and stresses to their professional and personal lives. The CAF Relocation Program manages the relocation process and supports CAF members and their families as they move to a new location. The program aims to make CAF member relocations easier without placing too much strain on members. As each member’s relocation is unique, it is essential to design and deliver the Relocation Program to support members and their relocation needs.

In 2016, the Department of National Defence (DND) started a competitive procurement process and chose Brookfield Global Relocation Services (BGRS) as the contracted relocation service provider. BGRS coordinates over 12,000 relocations annually. BGRS provides support services to CAF members and their families, primarily through an online self-service system. BGRS works with CAF members, various contracted service providers and other stakeholders in support of the CAF Relocation Program (as detailed in the following table). 

Table 2. Roles and Responsibilities of Key Stakeholders in the Relocation Program.
Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilities
BGRS
  • Coordinate the logistics of CAF members’ relocations; provide information to members; and pay some third-party service providers and members on behalf of the CAF.
  • Responsible for forwarding trip requests for processing to the Government’s travel service provider for booking flights.
CAF/Chain of Command
  • Send posting messages and validate or approve documents.
  • Different chains of command may have unique needs and different relocation processes and levels of support.
Relocation Coordinators
  • Provide administrative support; liaise with CMP and BGRS provider; and provide internal guidance to CAF members.
CAF Member
  • Coordinate relocation; read relocation documentation; and understand relocation benefits, conditions and limitations.
CMP/Director, Compensation and Benefits Administration
  • Monitor the administration of the Canadian Armed Forces Relocation Directive (CAFRD); propose CAFRD changes to TBS; adjudications and payment recovery; and clarify relocation policy.
CMP/Director, Relocation Business Management
  • Monitor the Relocation Program contract and develop future contracts; deliver training; verify relocation contract payments; and verify eligibility of CAFRD benefits.
Third-Party Service Providers
  • Provide a range of services required for a relocation such as real estate agents, home appraisers and lawyers.
Moving Companies
  • Three companies are contracted to provide domestic shipping services of household goods and effects.
Table 2 Summary

The left column contains the list of key stakeholders, and the right column contains the associated roles and responsibilities. Read the columns from left to right.


Back to Table of Contents

Key Findings

Finding 1: There are opportunities to improve efficiency within the Canadian Armed Forces Relocation Program.

The relocation process is complex and involves multiple stakeholders working to deliver relocation services (Annex C). BGRS provides relocation services through a self-service system, which requires CAF members to manage their own relocations. The length and complexity of the process can lead to errors and delays, causing inefficiencies. The complexity of the process further impacts the quality and consistency of information provided by BGRS and DND/CAF in support of relocations.

An analysis of the relocation process shows that 60 percent of activities are reviews and transfers resulting in delays. Footnote 1 These inefficiencies create a long and demanding process that CAF members find difficult to navigate. This leads to frustration among CAF members and an increased use of time, resources and money to complete relocations.

Opportunities to improve efficiencies include:

Inconsistent interpretation of policy by stakeholders contributes to these inefficiencies and challenges. CAFRD is the central reference point and policy for CAF member consultation. It is supplemented by more than a dozen departmental and third-party resources and reference documents. Sixty-one percentFootnote 2 of sampled CAF members find that CAFRD and other guidance are unclear and difficult to navigate (as demonstrated in Figure 1). Relocation policies are detailed, but they are not always clear or communicated. CAF members must consult and gather information from multiple documents, websites and tools to navigate the process, which affects productivity and morale as a result.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Questionnaire Results on the Clarity of Relocation Policy.
Figure 1 Summary

This figure is a bar chart that shows the survey results regarding the clarity of relocation policies and directives. There are five bars representing five responses on the chart, flowing from left to right.

The distribution of responses to the statement “Relocation police and directives are clear” is as follows: Strongly disagree 23 percent, disagree 38 percent, neutral 14 percent, agree 22 percent, strongly agree 3 percent


Relocation training and support are occurring at the departmental level. During posting season, CMP offers virtual relocation information sessions for relocating CAF members in support of CAFRD. Support on bases/wings varies depending on the availability and experience of relocation coordinators. These forms of training can reduce redundancies and confusion but are not well known or used by CAF members who seek more direction and clarity for their relocations. CMP is developing and revising formal support sessions for CAF members to aid in the experience and efficiency of the relocation process.

Recommendation 1

CMP should create a single internal source of information for relevant guidance, including SOPs, references, lessons learned and hyperlinks. This information should be formally communicated to new and relocating CAF members. 

OPI: CMP

Management Response

CMP will ensure information on its websites is consolidated, current and available to relocating CAF members to ensure there is a single internal source of relevant relocation information and the details are communicated formally to new and relocating CAF members.


Back to Table of Contents

Finding 2: Canadian Armed Forces members are receiving required relocation services, but the Canadian Armed Forces Relocation Program is not meeting their needs. 

The CAF Relocation Program is successfully relocating CAF members, but members are experiencing high levels of stress and time managing their moves, taking time away from operational or personal activities. Of the sampled CAF members, 54 percent feel that relocation services do not meet their needs due to unclear direction and a lengthy and difficult process, and 58 percentFootnote 3 overall feel that the program is not meeting their needs. This has a negative impact on CAF morale (as shown in Figure 2).

Figure 2
Figure 2. Questionnaire Results on the Categorization of Relocation Challenges.
Figure 2 Summary

This figure is a bar chart that illustrates the main challenges faced during the relocation process as reported by survey respondents. There are seven bars representing seven challenge categories on the chart, flowing from left to right. The percentages for each challenge category are as follows: contacting a BGRS agent, 35 percent; receiving reimbursements in a timely manner, 55 percent; unclear relocation directive/process, 73 percent; errors made in claims and/or files, 52 percent; challenges with third-party suppliers, 28 percent; time required to prepare and move, 32 percent; support from Chain of Command, 9 percent; other 21 percent.


The relocation process is not flexible in accommodating members’ unique situations and needs. Gender-based Analysis Plus and accessibility analysis would allow the program to consider the unique factors of each member’s relocation and needs. Existing analysis and consideration of accessibility in practice does not meet the needs of some CAF members. 

There are gaps in the accessibility of the Relocation Program and online services. CAF members may be unable to fully access the BGRS system in certain circumstances beyond their control; for example, CAF members with injuries or disabilities may not have the ability to use the BGRS software or a computer. In these cases, a representative often needs to manage their relocations and finances; however, these representatives face challenges because they do not have access to the member’s accounts and/or the BGRS services. They need support from CAF administrative officers. 

These relocations can place a significant burden on administrative staff, members and families due to high levels of effort and inconvenience involved.


Subsequent Events:

As of August 2024, CMP has two new initiatives to improve members’ experiences in the CAF Relocation Program. CMP has conducted additional accessibility analysis to inform future contract requirements. CMP has also initiated an internal review of the CAF relocation experience to determine how the member experience and process may be improved from a user needs perspective. These initiatives will help address some of the findings in the audit report and provide an opportunity to re-examine existing service standards, needs and solutions.


Recommendation 2

CMP should conduct additional analysis on the CAF Relocation Program to determine member needs and expectations. This analysis should inform future policy and contracting updates to ensure that the program meets the needs and requirements of CAF members and their families.

OPI: CMP

Management Response

CMP will conduct an internal review of the relocation experience with a view to identifying areas for improvement.


Back to Table of Contents

Finding 3: Mechanisms are in place to support the monitoring and oversight of the Canadian Armed Forces Relocation Program and contract.

Relocation Program monitoring supports decision making through performance management and issue identification. CMP monitors through briefings, reimbursement reviews and anonymous surveys sent to CAF members. When CMP identifies an issue or a trend, bases/wings are required to conduct more detailed tracking. For example, reliability challenges related to the shipping of furniture and effects by contracted movers arose during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, more detailed tracking and mitigation efforts, such as detailed reporting and use of base storage solutions, were adapted until issues were resolved. CMP also receives data and reporting from BGRS. This data and feedback are used to amend policy and contracts in areas requiring support for CAF members and to inform future service requirements. 

The CAF Relocation Program contract is actively managed and contains mechanisms, such as key performance indicators, a member satisfaction survey, and transaction review, to identify and resolve contract issues. The contract is updated as needed to incorporate modifications that address issues related to the relocation process. 

The procurement process for a new contracted relocation service provider had begun prior to the completion of this audit. It is important that CMP prioritizes service quality, accessibility, clarity and timeliness. CMP is proactively addressing these concerns through the use of existing performance indicators to support decision making and inclusion of further metrics into future contracts. These mechanisms aim to ensure that the contracted relocation service provider continues to respect contract terms. 


Back to Table of Contents

Conclusion

Relocations promote professional development and serve operational requirements, but they are also a highly demanding time in CAF members’ lives with potential impacts to morale, retention and productivity. CAF members are receiving required relocation services, but by addressing opportunities to improve the program’s efficiency and clarity, there would be significant positive impacts on members’ satisfaction and further on the CAF’s operational readiness. 


Back to Table of Contents

Annex A: Management Action Plan

Recommendation 1

CMP should create a single internal source of information for relevant guidance, including SOPs, references, lessons learned and hyperlinks. This information should be formally communicated to new and relocating CAF members. 

OPI: CMP Director General Compensation and Benefits

Management Action

CMP accepts this recommendation. CMP will ensure information on its websites is consolidated, current and available to relocating CAF members to ensure there is a single internal source of relevant relocation information and the details are communicated formally to new and relocating CAF members.

Table A-1. Management Action Plan 1
Deliverable Timeline
1.1 In consultation with key stakeholders, members and users of relocation services, CMP will identify relocation issues, existing related guidance and any gaps. December 2024
1.2 CMP will ensure that this information (such as relevant guidance, SOPs, references, lessons learned and related hyperlinks) is up to date, addresses identified gaps and is available in a single internal location. December 2024
1.3 CMP will continue to share relocation guidance with new and relocating members, ensuring that periodic consultations inform updates. CMP currently emails this guidance to members when they register with BGRS for relocation services. Complete
1.4 CMP will continue to support awareness and understanding of the relocation process and available resources by ensuring that training materials are available to members. Complete
Table A-1 Summary

The left column contains the list of deliverables, and the right column contains the associated timeline. Read the columns from left to right.


This Management Action Plan will be considered closed when there is a single internal source of information updated regularly that is readily available to members to support their understanding and use of relocation services.
 

Recommendation 2

CMP should conduct additional analysis on the CAF Relocation Program to determine member needs and expectations. This analysis should inform future policy and contracting updates to ensure that the program meets the needs and requirements of CAF members and their families.

OPI: CMP

Management Action

CMP accepts this recommendation. CMP will conduct an internal review of the relocation experience with a view to identifying areas for improvement.

Table A-2. Management Action Plan 2
Deliverable Timeline
2.1 CMP will conduct an internal review of the relocation experience to identify problems and gaps in communication with members regarding the current process. December 2024
2.2 Define next steps based on the findings from the internal review that will contribute to improved communication for members in the relocation experience. October 2025

2.3 Introduce modern accessibility standards and include them in the future contract.
Note: Accessibility standards as defined by the Treasury Board Secretariat have been included in the Statement of Work for the future contract.

Complete
2.4 Confirm accessibility criteria are implemented internally and by the new contracted relocation service provider in the new service contract once awarded and implemented. April 2026
2.5 Conduct annual reviews of the relocation experience with members as well as the service provider to inform future updates of the Relocation Program and ensure the needs and accessibility requirements of members and families are addressed. October 2025
Table A-2 Summary

The left column contains the list of deliverables, and the right column contains the associated timeline. Read the columns from left to right.


This Management Action Plan will be considered closed when review mechanisms are in place to identify evolving member needs and accessibility requirements and to inform future updates to the Relocation Program and contract.
 


Back to Table of Contents

Annex B: About the Engagement

This engagement conforms with the Internal Auditing Standards for the Government of Canada, as supported by the results of the Quality Assurance and Improvement Program.

Objective

The objective of this audit was to provide assurance that DND/CAF relocation services are effectively governed and delivered to support CAF members across the bases and wings.

Scope and Approach

The audit scope included a review of policies and directives; contract management; monitoring; and service delivery. Scope exclusions included resourcing and staffing; financial transactions and/or files; outside Canada postings; and adjudications/grievances.

A questionnaire was distributed to 246 CAF members, across eight bases and wings, who had recently completed a domestic relocation. There was a response rate of 37 percent for a total of 92 responses, which inform the statistics in this report denoted by a “sampled group.” These statistics are a non-representative sample of the population of relocating CAF members.

A process map was developed from a review of key relocation documentation and consultation with CAF members and relocation coordinators. It was then formalized in a 215-step process map. This process map and review were completed using a lean process mapping and efficiency analysis. Lean is a production-based, continuous improvement methodology focused on maximizing productivity and value while simultaneously minimizing waste within a process. Annex C contains the streamlined version of this process map.

Period Covered

The engagement covered the period from April 2020 to October 2023. This is the period to which the engagement conclusion applies as audit work was conducted from November 2023 to May 2024.


Back to Table of Contents

Annex C: Process Map – Canadian Armed Forces Relocations

Figure C-1
Figure C-1. Process Map
Figure C-1 Summary

This flow chart outlines the step-by-step process involved in Canadian Armed Forces relocations. The steps are listed in 14 boxes with arrow signs designating the order in which the relocation process takes place. 

The process is broken down into the following stages: 

  • Notice (career manager) – led by CAF management
  • Posting notification – led by CAF management
  • BGRS registration and meeting – led by CAF members
  • Sell house/terminate lease – led by third-party service providers
  • House hunting trip – led by CAF members
  • Buy/rent home – led by CAF members
  • Organize and prepare move – led by CAF members
  • Book moving company – led by CAF management
  • Pack/load/clean – led by third-party service providers
  • Travel to new location – led by CAF members
  • Unload/unpack – led by third-party service providers
  • Complete move – led by CAF members
  • Submit final receipt to BGRS – led by CAF members
  • Settle all final claims – led by BGRS

Beneath the chart is a note: Consultation with BGRS continues throughout the process following the initial registration. 


Back to Table of Contents

Page details

2025-02-20