Canadian Special Operations Forces Command’s Innovation and Project Approval Review 
Outcome-Based Program

ADM(RS)
Assistant Deputy Minister (Review Services)
BCA
Business Case Analysis
C Prog
Chief of Programme
CANSOFCOM
Canadian Special Operations Forces Command
CJIRU
Canadian Joint Incident Response Unit
CSOR
Canadian Special Operations Regiment
CSOTC
Canadian Special Operations Training Centre
DCB
Defence Capabilities Board
DND
Department of National Defence
EA
Expenditure Authority
IRPDA
Independent Review Panel for Defence Acquisition
JTF 2
Joint Task Force Two
OBP
Outcome-Based Program
PA
Project Approval
PCB
Project Control Board
PCRA
Project Complexity and Risk Assessment
PMB
Programme Management Board
PMP
Project Management Plan
SCARP
SOF Capabilities and Recapitalization Project
SOAS
Special Operations Aviation Squadron
SOF
Special Operations Forces
SRB
Senior Review Board
Figure 1
Figure 1. CANSOFCOM Organizational Chart. This figure illustrates the organizational units within CANSOFCOM.
 
  1. Joint Task Force Two
  2. Canadian Joint Incident Response Unit
  3. Special Operations Aviation Squadron
  4. Canadian Special Operations Training Centre
Figure 1 Details – CANSOFCOM Organizational Chart
Table 1 – Stakeholders
Figure 2
Figure 2. Approaches to Project Approval Process. This figure illustrates the standard and OBP project approval process for major equipment projects.

Figure 2 Details – Approaches to Project Approval Process
Figure 3
Figure 3. Project Approval Process Governance. This figure compares the governance for the standard Project Approval process with that of the CSOR Equipment Project. 
 
Figure 3 Details – Project Approval Process Governance
Table 2. Summary of Assessment for OBP. This table assesses the CSOR equipment project against the most recent policies, guidance and standards to provide a forward-looking assessment relevant to the OBP implementation and not to measure the project’s compliance.
The CSOR equipment project (2007) was assessed against the most recent policies (2015 Project Approval Directive), guidance and standards to provide a forward-looking assessment relevant to the OBP implementation and not to measure the project’s compliance.


A: Governance Structures and Mechanisms

  • Governance structures and mechanisms are in place
  • A change management process is in place
  • The rank/levels of SRB attendees is not always appropriate to support decision making

B: Risk Management

  • Risks are managed, through project risk register and discussions at SRB
  • Updated Departmental risk-management requirements (i.e., a full risk-management plan) have not been developed for the OBP

C: Performance Measurement

  • CSOR project performance (scope, schedule and cost) is measured and reported
  • Key performance indicators aligned to strategic objectives to measure OBP outcomes have not been developed


D: Lessons Learned

  • Lessons learned are captured at the end of the project
  • Informal process in place to identify, collect, analyse, consolidate and apply lessons learned
  • No centrally located repository for lessons learned

● Processes generally in place and operating effectively / ◐ Some deficiencies or areas for improvement /○ Processes to be developed or implemented

Table 2 Details – Summary of Assessment for OBP

ADM(RS) Recommendation

ADM(RS) Recommendation

ADM(RS) Recommendation

ADM(RS) Recommendation

Figure 4
Figure 4. Project Approval Process Key Stakeholders. This figure illustrates the key stakeholders and their accountabilities throughout the life-cycle of the project.

Figure 4 Details – Project Approval Process Key Stakeholders


Back to Table of Contents

Report a problem or mistake on this page
Please select all that apply:

Thank you for your help!

You will not receive a reply. For enquiries, contact us.

Date modified: