HUMA Committee appearance binder: Appearance of Deputy-Minister Flack - April 15, 2021
Official title: Deputy Minister Employment and Social Development Canada Appearance - Auditor General of Canada 2021 Report 6 – Canada Emergency Response Benefit - Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP) -
Appearance of the Deputy Minister - Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP) -
On this page
Opening statement
Auditor General Report
Top Issues
- Timeline and Legislation for EI-CERB-CRB
- Preventing applicants from receiving CERB from both SC and CRA
- Cost of EI-ERB, CERB, and Canada Recovery Benefits (CRB, CRCB, CRSB)
- CERB overpayments
- CERB Integrity
- PTs clawing back social assistance benefits
- CERB Statistics Website – $7B variance
- Description and costing of ESDC COVID Measures
- CERB Gender Based Analysis Plus
- International Monetary Fund (IMF) Report
- Aging IT Systems and Benefits Delivery Modernization
- CERB Performance Measurement Approach
Committee and parliamentary Information
1. Opening Remarks
For Graham Flack, Deputy Minister of Employment and Social Development for an appearance Before the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP) regarding the 2021 Reports of the Auditor General of Canada to the Parliament of Canada – (Report 6—COVID19 Pandemic – Canada Emergency Response Benefit) - House of Commons April 15, 2021.
Check against delivery.
(2021 PA 000342)
Opening
Mr. Chair,
First, thank you for the invitation to appear before the committee today.
We are here to talk about the Auditor General’s Report on the design and delivery of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit, commonly known as the CERB.
The Government of Canada welcomes the Report. We recognize the importance of the findings and we accept all the recommendations. In fact, we have already started to address those recommendations.
Supporting Canadians
Before I talk about that work, I would like to take a moment to recognize the tremendous efforts by Employment and Social Development Canada – or ESDC – and the Canada Revenue Agency – or CRA to design and rollout the CERB in the matter of weeks.
The CERB helped more than 8 million workers and their families stay afloat. The quick and decisive actions taken to provide income support to millions of Canadians affected by closures and public health restrictions helped buffer the worst economic impacts.
Rapidly, ESDC and CRA created a simple and straightforward application with back-end verifications. As the benefit rolled out, adjustments were made to support even more Canadians and our economic recovery. These adjustments included an expansion of eligibility so that workers making up to $1,000 a month could still be eligible, as well as key measures to prevent fraud.
We took a never-before-seen approach to roll out support quickly during an unprecedented emergency.
On top of having to adapt to their new teleworking reality, many ESDC and CRA employees were homeschooling their kids, supporting family members and providing care to loved ones who may have been affected by COVID-19
Despite all this, they worked tirelessly to make sure Canadians would get the support they needed as fast as possible.
There are no words to express how proud I am to work with such devoted and hard-working people. They truly demonstrate what the Canadian public service is all about; respect, integrity stewardship and excellence.Footnote 1
The Auditor General’s report also acknowledges the work done by Canadian public servants, and recognizes the approach taken by the Government of Canada.
Addressing Recommendations
The Report has made 2 recommendations for ESDC, both of which the Department welcomes and accepts.
The first is to finalize and implement plans for CERB post-payment verification.
I can tell you that throughout the delivery of the CERB, ESDC and CRA were actively detecting, preventing and disrupting fraudulent activity. ESDC identified over 30,000 potentially fraudulent applications, preventing approximately $42 million in payments from being issued.
A 4-year post-payment verification plan has been developed and initiated to ensure that those who received the benefit were eligible. And as you know, the Fall Economic Statement provided additional resources to both ESDC and the CRA to support this work. That boost in funding will help us take action to detect, investigate and address cases of fraud related to the benefit.
The second recommendation is around “lessons learned”.
On that front, I can tell you that we are going to complete a formal assessment of the CERB that will assist the Government of Canada in the design and delivery of future government emergency response and recovery programs. We will begin this work in collaboration with the CRA in the summer of 2021.
Closing
In closing, I would like to reiterate that we welcome and accept the Auditor General’s recommendations.
As we move ahead in our economic recovery, we will continue our work on post-payment verification, while also supporting Canadians who have been hit hardest during the pandemic.
The CERB was implemented to support Canadians and protect the economy from the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic. The lessons learned will help in the design and delivery of future benefit programs.
Thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today.
I will now take your questions.
-30-
2. COVID-19 Pandemic
3. Employment and Social Development Canada detailed action plan to the recommendations of the Office of the Auditor General Performance Audit on COVID-19 - Canada Emergency Response Benefit
Report Ref. No.
NA
OAG Recommendation
NA
Management Response
The departmental Management Response (MR) will be included in the OAG’s audit report that is tabled to Parliament and posted on the OAG’s website.
The response must clearly indicate, in no more than 200 words, whether the entity agrees or disagrees with the recommendation.
If entity agrees, the response should describe specific actions it intends to take and their timing.
If entity disagrees, the response should state the reasons.
Description of Final Expected Outcome/Result
The action plan will be provided to the Public Accounts Committee (PACP) within 6 months of the audit being tabled, or when feasible, prior to the hearing, should the organization be invited to appear before PACP to discuss the findings of an audit.
The detailed action plan will be published on the PACP’s website
Expected Final Completion Date
The action plan will be provided to the Public Accounts Committee (PACP) within 6 months of the audit being tabled, or when feasible, prior to the hearing, should the organization be invited to appear before PACP to discuss the findings of an audit.
The detailed action plan will be published on the PACP’s website.
Key Interim Milestones (Description/Dates)
The action plan will be provided to the Public Accounts Committee (PACP) within 6 months of the audit being tabled, or when feasible, prior to the hearing, should the organization be invited to appear before PACP to discuss the findings of an audit.
The detailed action plan will be published on the PACP’s website.
Responsible Organization/ Point of Contact (Name, Position, Tel number)
The action plan will be provided to the Public Accounts Committee (PACP) within 6 months of the audit being tabled, or when feasible, prior to the hearing, should the organization be invited to appear before PACP to discuss the findings of an audit.
The detailed action plan will be published on the PACP’s website.
Indicator of Achievement (For PACP Committee Use Only)
N/A
Report Ref. No.
Para 6.64
OAG Recommendation
Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) and the Canada Revenue Agency should finalize and implement their plans for the Canada Emergency Response Benefit post- payment verification work.
Management Response
ESDC agrees with this recommendation.
Throughout the pandemic, the Department engaged in robust and proactive planning for post-payment integrity action on EI-ERB claims. Following confirmation of funding in the 2020 Fall Economic Statement, the Department developed a comprehensive 4-year operational plan for post-payment integrity activtites and has begun execution of cases of serious fraud.
Integrity activities are underway and will continue as per the 4-year operational plan. The plan will be refined on a regular basis as the Department gains experience and knowledge from its investigations and ensure that it remains responsive to the continued pandemic context, while maintaining alignment with CRA.
Description of Final Expected Outcome/Result
A detailed 4-year plan has been finalized and is being implemented as an extension of the plan implemented in 2020 to 2021.
Expected Final Completion Date
December 31, 2020
March 31, 2021
Key interim milestones (description and dates)
- Completed - Develop a detailed operational plan for the identification and recovery of EI- ERB erroneous payments and overpayments over the upcoming 4 years
- Working in collaboration with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), adjust any elements of the 4- year plan to ensure alignment of integrity activities
Responsible Organization/ Point of Contact (Name, Position, Tel number)
Lead: ISB ADM, Elise Boisjoly
Co-leads: Regions
Indicator of Achievement (For PACP Committee Use Only)
N/A
Report Ref. No.
Para 6.65
OAG Recommendation
ESDC and the Canada Revenue Agency should conduct a formal assessment of the delivery of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit in order to apply the findings to the design and delivery of future government emergency response and recovery benefits.
Management Response
ESDC agrees with this recommendation.
The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) was implemented to protect Canadians and the economy from the impacts of the global COVID-19 pandemic, but the lessons learned could have broader application to future benefit program design and delivery.
ESDC agrees that a formal assessment of the delivery of the CERB will inform the design and development of future emergency response benefits.
Description of Final Expected Outcome/Result
A report summarising the findings of the assessment. The report will subsequently be shared with relevant internal and external stakeholders.
Expected Final Completion Date
The assessment will be initiated in summer 2021.
Key interim milestones (description/dates)
- Engagement with key stakeholders
- Finalize the assessment for the delivery of the CERB
- Share the report with relevant internal and external stakeholders
Responsible Organization/ Point of Contact (Name, Position, Tel number)
Elisha Ram
Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Skills and Employment Branch
Cliff Groen
Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Benefits and Integrated Services Branch
Indicator of Achievement (For PACP Committee Use Only)
N/A
4.a Finalize and Implement Plans for CERB Post-Payment Verification Work
Issue
ESDC has a 4-year operational plan to investigate CERB related fraud.
Key facts
- On March 25, 2021, the Auditor General of Canada (OAG) released its independent report on the design and delivery of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB)
- In the report, the OAG recommended that ESDC and the CRA finalize and implement their plan for CERB post-payment verification work and the department agreed
Response
- The department agrees with the OAG’s recommendation to finalize and implement a plan for CERB post-payment verification work
- Service Canada takes the integrity of its programs very seriously and remains committed to the financial stewardship of its programs
- The Government’s Fall Economic Statement announced $260 million over 4 years for ESDC and the CRA to increase the capacity to detect, investigate and address cases of fraud or misrepresentation related to the Canada Emergency Response Benefit.
- Service Canada uses data analytics and intelligence capabilities to actively monitor and identify cases of error and fraud
- In addition, the Department has been working closely with key partners, including other government departments and law enforcement agencies, to detect and disrupt cases of possible fraud
Background
Throughout the pandemic, ESDC leveraged its analytics and intelligence capabilities to disrupt, detect and prevent fraud. As part of our work, the Department was able to identify and implement stop payments for approximately 30,000 potentially fraudulent applications for the EI ERB, preventing approximately $42 million in payments from being issued. These alerts are being investigated.
We take the integrity of our programs very seriously, and have put in place a multi-year plan for investigations focusing on the areas of highest risk, such as identity fraud. We will work closely with the CRA to ensure alignment of efforts.
Prepared by
Name: Kathleen Walford
Title: Director General
No phone number: NA
Key contact
Name: Kathleen Walford
Title: Director General
Phone number: NA
Approved by
Name: NA
Title: NA
Phone number: NA
Date
Date approved in SADMO / COO: April 9, 2021
4.b Formal Assessment of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit
Issue
What is the Government’s response to the Office of the Auditor General (OAG)’s recommendation to conduct a formal assessment of the delivery of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit?
Key facts
- The OAG’s independent report on the development and delivery of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB), tabled in Parliament on March 25, 2021, made 2 recommendations addressed to both the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC)
- The first recommendation is that ESDC and the CRA should finalize and implement their plans for the CERB post-payment verification work
- The second recommendation is that ESDC and the CRA should conduct a formal assessment of the delivery of the CERB in order to apply the findings to the design and delivery of future government emergency response and recovery benefits
Response
- In response to the COVID-19 crisis, the Government provided direct and rapid income support to millions of Canadian workers impacted by closures and public health restrictions, by introducing the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) in a matter of weeks
- The Government welcomes the Auditor General’s report on the CERB and gratefully accepts the recommendations
- The CERB was implemented to protect Canadians and the economy from the impact of the global COVID 19 pandemic, but the lessons learned could have broader application to future benefit program design and delivery
- Work is already underway to address the report’s recommendations. A post-payment verification plan has been developed and initiated to ensure that those who received the benefit were eligible
- The Department will undertake an assessment of the CERB’s design and delivery. This will help the Government of Canada apply lessons learned for the design of future emergency response benefits. This work will begin as soon as possible, taking into account the need to continue to respond to the pandemic and support the economic recovery
Background
- The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) was an important and necessary temporary emergency response to support Canadian workers, including the self-employed, who stopped working due to COVID-19
- The CERB was delivered by the Canada Revenue Agency and Service Canada and provided a weekly amount of $500 for up to 28 weeks, between March 15, 2020, and October 3, 2020. The CERB followed a simplified attestation-based design with integrity applied at the back end, to provide rapid temporary income support to Canadians whose employment was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic
- The Office of the Auditor General (OAG)’s independent report on the design and delivery of the CERB was tabled in Parliament on March 25, 2021
- As indicated in the OAG report, the quick roll-out and subsequent adjustments of the CERB helped Canadians to stay at home to avoid overwhelming the country’s health care system, while allowing them to meet their financial obligations. The report acknowledges that the decision the Government made to focus on “post-payment” rather than upfront verification helped to expedite benefit payments to Canadians when they needed them
- While there are no recommendations with respect to the design of the benefit, there are 2 recommendations with respect to controls in the report addressed to both the CRA and ESDC
- The first relates to finalizing and implementing the plans for post-payment verification for the CERB. The second calls for a formal assessment of the delivery of the CERB in order to apply the findings to the design and delivery of future government emergency response and recovery benefits
- ESDC and the CRA have responded to these recommendations in the report noting that they are in agreement.
Citations / Key quotes
“Today, we welcome the Auditor General’s report on the design and delivery of the CERB, recognize the importance of the findings and accept all recommendations. Work is already underway to address the report’s recommendations. A post-payment verification plan has been developed and initiated to ensure that those who received the benefit were eligible. Additionally, work will begin on an assessment of the CERB’s design and delivery. This will help the Government of Canada apply lessons learned for the design of future emergency response benefits.” ESDC and CRA joint statement, March 25th, 2021
Prepared by
Name: Christina Abbass
Title: Policy Analyst
Key contact
Name: Steven Coté
Title: A/ Executive Director
Phone number: 819-654-8775
Approved by
Name: Elisha Ram
Title: AADM, Skills and Employment Branch
Phone number: 819-654-5212
Date
Date approved in SADMO: April 9, 20215. Qs and As on Integrity
Q: Why did the department not prevent applications going to both ESDC and CRA at the outset of the benefit program?
A: To ensure the timely delivery of the benefit to Canadians, CERB applicants were directed to apply to either ESDC or the CRA depending on their EI eligibility. As a result, there were cases where applicants ended up applying through both the CRA’s and ESDC’s portals.
This issue was quickly addressed by introducing new pre-payment controls to stop applicants from receiving duplicate benefits about a week after the launch of CERB.
Over the lifespan of the CERB, additional validation controls were introduced into the program and its application.
ESDC and CRA are working together closely on post-payment verification to ensure that individuals in an overpayment situation will be required to repay the amounts to which they are not entitled.
The total amount of payments issued to people applying through both CRA and ESDC does not represent a systematic issue in the delivery of the CERB. Due to quick action to rectify the problem, this amount represented less than 1% of total CERB payments.
Q: Why did the department not build in more integrity measures up front into the program?
A: CERB was launched to address the historically high number of Canadians in financial need due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The impacts of COVID-19 on all aspects of the Canadian economy, translated into an immediate and dramatic surge in the number of citizens applying for EI benefits. For example, from March through September 2020, alone, more than 4.96 million EI ERB applications were received compared to approximately 225,000 during the same time-period in previous years. It was obvious that existing measures to adjudicate claims, with many upfront controls, could not sustain these volumes. Payments to applicants would take months to process, leaving millions of citizens without income during the pandemic. Simplification measures included moving to a benefit flat rate and the interim use of applicant attestations pre-benefit payment over the requirement for receipt of upfront documentary evidence. For example, claimants who applied for EI ERB benefits were not required to obtain a medical certificate, as they would have had previously.
In order to ensure that Canadians in need received the benefit as quickly as possible, a conscious decision was made to shift a number of up-front controls to the post payment period. Service Canada knew that in time of crisis, the risk of fraud is heightened, however, in order to ensure that Canadians in need received the benefit as quickly as possible, a conscious decision was made to reduce upfront controls and focus on post-payment measures to identify and address cases of fraud. This approach followed the best practices promoted by the International Public Sector Fraud Forum and their 5 principles of Fraud Control in Emergency Management.
Moreover, the Department provided information on design implementation risks to Parliamentary Committees more specifically at HUMA in May 2020, ensuring a transparent approach to delivery of the emergency benefits.
As part of our work, the Department was able to identify and implement stop payments for approximately 30,000 potentially fraudulent applications for the EI ERB, preventing approximately $42 million in payments from being issued.
The Government’s Fall Economic Statement announced $260 million over 4 years for ESDC and the CRA to increase the capacity to detect, investigate and address cases of fraud or misrepresentation related to the Canada Emergency Response Benefit.
We continue to conduct investigations to identify and address cases of error, fraud, and abuse.
We have a detailed plan in place for post-payment verification. The first priority has been to identify and take measures against those who may have knowingly engaged in fraud/abused the system. Part of the plan includes providing relief to vulnerable individuals who may be adversely impacted, such as victims of identity theft. We also plan to use data as it becomes available to verify eligibility criteria.
There will be no penalties or interest for those who applied in good faith, and there will be flexibility to address various circumstances where benefit repayment may impact, in particular, low-income individuals
Q: Why will post-payment verification plan take 4 years?
A: The Government’s Fall Economic Statement announced $260 million over 4 years for ESDC and the CRA to increase the capacity to detect, investigate and address cases of fraud or misrepresentation related to the Canada Emergency Response Benefit.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, ESDC has been leveraging analytics and intelligence collection capabilities to disrupt, detect and prevent fraudulent activity. These tools and techniques are continually reviewed and refined to ensure we are focussing our efforts in the right areas. In addition, we have been working with law enforcement, financial institutions and other partners to detect and disrupt fraud.
As part of our work, the Department was able to identify and implement stop payments for approximately 30,000 potentially fraudulent applications for the EI ERB, preventing approximately $42 million in payments from being issued.
We have a detailed plan in place for post-payment verification. Given the large number of recipients, Service Canada will continue to use its analytical and investigation tools to identify areas when payments may have been made to those that do not qualify. This will require additional manual interventions given the rapidity at which the systems were developed.
The first priority has been to identify and take measures against those who may have knowingly engaged in fraud/abused the system. These types of investigations can take time.
Part of the plan includes providing support to vulnerable individuals who may be adversely impacted, such as victims of identity theft. These can be complex cases as well.
We also plan to use data as it becomes available to verify eligibility criteria. For example, new data sources such as 2020 tax returns will support these efforts.
Under the normal EI program, ESDC has 6 years to finalize investigations. It is not abnormal for an integrity program to be spread over a period of a few years.
We anticipate that a large portion of the low complexity post-payment verification will be completed within the first 3 years.
Q: What is the plan for recouping overpayments?
A: Service Canada takes the integrity of its programs very seriously and remains committed to the financial stewardship of its programs.
We know that in time of crisis, the risk of fraud is heightened and we intend to continue to conduct file reviews to identify and address cases of error and fraud.
We will use data analytics to identify areas or error or fraud, focusing on areas of greatest risk. We know errors can happen and we have been made aware of individuals successfully applying for and receiving CERB. We will work closely with recipients to make arrangements to repay any amounts owing and flexible payment arrangements may be made based on individual financial situations.
Applicants found to have intentionally made fraudulent claims will be required to repay the benefit amounts they received from the Government, and may face additional consequences such as referral to law enforcement.
Q: Why are there no penalties?
A: Service Canada takes the integrity of its programs very seriously and remains committed to the financial stewardship of its programs.
We know that in time of crisis, the risk of fraud is heightened and we intend to continue to conduct investigations to identify and address cases of error and fraud.
Penalties were proposed in bill C-17 in July and the bill was not passed.
We know errors can happen and we have been made aware of individuals successfully applying for and receiving CERB despite not being eligible. We will work closely with recipients to make arrangements to repay any amounts owing and flexible payment arrangements may be made based on individual financial situations. Interest will not be applied to overpayments.
We have been able to identify and implement stop payments for approximately 30,000 potentially fraudulent applications for the EI ERB, preventing approximately $42 million in payments from being issued.
Applicants found to have intentionally made fraudulent claims will be required to repay the benefit amounts they received from the Government, and may face additional consequences such as referral to law enforcement.
Q: There have been numerous reports related to identify fraud, especially in Quebec as it related to CERB. What are you doing about this?
A: Service Canada takes the integrity of its programs very seriously and remains committed to the financial stewardship of its programs.
We know that in time of crisis, the risk of fraud is heightened and we intend to continue to conduct investigations to identify and address cases of error and fraud.
In the last few years, there have been a significant number of data breaches that affected Canadians. These have resulted in personal information breaches and increased their risk of identity fraud.
We will also work closely with those who may have fallen victim to identity fraud. We are also working closely with law enforcement when warranted.
The Government’s Fall Economic Statement announced $260 million over 4 years for ESDC and the CRA to increase the capacity to detect, investigate and address cases of fraud or misrepresentation related to the Canada Emergency Response Benefit.
This investment will assist in addressing fraudulent activity, like identity theft.
We continue to strengthen our system to validate and authenticate our clients and prevent personal identification thieves from accessing our programs. Recently, we have implemented a multi factor authentication to increase protection of Canadians personal information and reduce the risk of fraud.
6. Timeline and Legislation for EI-CERB-CRB
1. The Canada Emergency Response Benefit
Start date: March 15, 2020
End date: October 3, 2020
The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) was an important and necessary temporary response to support Canadian workers, including the self-employed, who stopped working due to COVID-19. The CERB provided a weekly amount of $500 for up to 28 weeks, between March 15, 2020, and October 3, 2020. The deadline to retroactively apply for CERB was December 2, 2020.
Legislation
The CERB was delivered under the authority of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit Act by the Canada Revenue Agency and under the authority of the Employment Insurance Act by Service Canada.
2. Temporary Enhancements to Employment Insurance
Start Date: September 27, 2020
End Date: September 25, 2021
As part of COVID-19: Financial support, the Government transitioned from the CERB to a simplified Employment Insurance (EI) program, effective September 27, 2020, to provide income support to eligible workers who remain unable to work. Recognizing that many workers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic will have lost their jobs or are working reduced hours, a set of temporary measures have been introduced to facilitate access to EI benefits. Measures include:
- a minimum unemployment rate of 13.1% applies to all regions across Canada since August 9, 2020 and until September 11, 2021
- allowing workers with 120 insurable hours to qualify for benefits because of a one-time credit of:
- 300 insured hours if applying for regular benefits; and
- 480 insured hours if applying for sickness, maternity, parental or caregiving benefits, and;
- a minimum weekly benefit of $500 per before taxes, or $300 before taxes for extended parental benefits
These measures allow Canadians to qualify for EI with a one-time eligibility of 120 hours of work, establish a minimum benefit rate of $500 per week and provide a minimum entitlement of 26 weeks of regular benefits (extended to a maximum of 50 weeks on March 18, 2021) for claims established between September 27, 2020 to September 25, 2021.
To support small businesses and workers, the Government of Canada has also frozen the EI premium rate for 2 years at the current 2020 rate.
In early January 2021, Canada experienced an increase in COVID-19 infections, which resulted in additional public health measures and increased financial pressure on workers. In response, the Government of Canada waived the waiting period for all new EI claims established from January 31, 2021 until September 25, 2021. This enables eligible workers to be paid for the first week of unemployment.
Lower Threshold for Self-Employed Workers
Start date: January 3, 2021
End Date: September 25, 2021
Self-employed workers who have opted in to the EI program are now able to access EI special benefits with a 2020 earnings threshold of $5,000, compared to the previous threshold of $7,555. This change is retroactive for claim established as of January 3, 2021 and applies until September 25, 2021.
Extension of Employment Insurance regular benefits
Start date: March 18, 2021
End Date: September 25, 2021
To support Canadian workers through the next phase of the pandemic recovery, the Government has extended EI regular benefits from a minimum entitlement of 26 weeks to a maximum of 50 weeks.
Legislation and Regulations
The hours credit, minimum benefit rate and minimum weeks of entitlement were made through an interim order under the authority of the Employment Insurance Act.
The waiving of the waiting period was made through amendments to the Employment Insurance Regulations under the authority of the Employment Insurance Act.
The lowered threshold for self-employed workers and the extension of regular benefits were made through amendments to the EI Act brought forward in Bill C-24 (An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (additional regular benefits), the Canada Recovery Benefits Act (restriction on eligibility) and another Act in response to COVID-19), which received Royal Assent on March 17, 2021.
3. Recovery Benefits
Start date: September 27, 2020
End Date: September 25, 2021
The Government introduced 3 temporary Recovery Benefits to provide income support to those Canadian workers who are not eligible for EI and those who require tailored support when their employment is affected by COVID-19. These include the:
- Canada Recovery Benefit
The new Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB) provides a benefit amount of $500 per week (available in 2-week periods) for up to 26 weeks (extended to 38 weeks on March 18, 2021) for those who are not eligible for EI and are not employed or self-employed due to COVID-19, or have had their employment/self-employment income reduced by at least 50% due to COVID-19.
- Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit
The Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit (CRSB) provides a benefit amount of $500 per week (available in one-week periods), for up to 2 weeks (extended to 4 weeks on March 18, 2021) for those who are unable to work because they are sick or must self-isolate due to COVID-19, or have underlying conditions would make them more susceptible to COVID-19.
- Canada Recovery Caregiving Benefit
The Canada Recovery Caregiving Benefit (CRCB) provides a benefit amount of $500 per week (available in one-week periods) for up to 26 weeks (extended to 38 weeks on March 18, 2021) for those who are unable to work because they must care for their child under the age of 12 or family member who needs supervised care.
Extension of the Recovery Benefits
Start date: March 18, 2021
End Date: September 25, 2021
On March 18, 2021, the Government approved regulations to increase the number of weeks available for the Canada recovery benefits to ensure continued support as Canada’s economy and labour force recovers:
- 12 weeks (for a total of 38 weeks) for the Canada Recovery Benefit
- 12 weeks (for a total of 38 weeks) for the Canada Recovery Caregiving Benefit
- 2 weeks (for a total of 4 weeks) for the Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit
The Canada Recovery Benefits Act established the Canada Recovery Benefit, the Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit, and the Canada Recovery Caregiving Benefit to support Canada’s economic recovery in response to COVID-19. The Canada Recovery Benefits Act received Royal Assent on October 2, 2020.
The Canada Recovery Benefit, the Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit, and the Canada Recovery Caregiving Benefit were extended through regulations on March 17, 2021.
7. Preventing applicants from receiving CERB from both Service Canada and CRA
Issue
Instances where individuals applied to both the Service Canada and the Canada Revenue Agency for the Canada Emergency Response Benefit
Key facts
- Service Canada and the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) jointly administered the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) to ensure that Canadians received the money they were entitled to as quickly as possible
- As 2 organizations were administering the CERB independently, at the outset, there were situations where clients mistakenly applied for the benefit through both Service Canada and CRA, which resulted in a double payment
- Service Canada and CRA worked together to ensure that these situations were addressed and payments to eligible clients did not exceed the maximum allowable benefit of 28 weeks or $14,000
- Within one week of the launch of the CERB, Service Canada and CRA introduced pre-payment controls to stop applicants from receiving duplicate benefits
- Due to quick action taken to rectify the problem, this amount represented less than 1% of total CERB payments
Response
- Service Canada takes the integrity of its programs very seriously and remains committed to the financial stewardship of its programs
- The CERB, jointly delivered by Service Canada and the Canada Revenue Agency, was an important and necessary temporary emergency response implemented to protect Canadians and the economy from the impacts of the global COVID-19 pandemic
- To stop applicants from receiving duplicate benefits, our Department and Canada Revenue Agency quickly introduced, within one-week of the launch of CERB, pre-payment controls
- The Government’s Fall Economic Statement announced $260 million over 4 years for our Department and the Canada Revenue Agency to increase the capacity to detect, investigate and address cases of fraud or misrepresentation related to the CERB
- While there will not be any penalty for Canadians if they have received a payment in error, they will be required to repay the CERB benefits for which they are not eligible
Background
As the COVID-19 pandemic began, the Government needed to provide direct and rapid income supports to Canadians whose jobs were impacted by closures and public health restrictions. It was determined that, due to the expected volume of applications, usual processing rules would result in significant delays in issuing the benefit. The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) was introduced, and jointly administered by ESDC (Service Canada) and the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to ensure that Canadians received the money they were entitled to as quickly as possible.
As the 2 organizations were administering the CERB independently, at the outset, there were situations where clients mistakenly applied for the benefit through both streams, which resulted in a double payment from Service Canada and the CRA. Within 1-week of the launch of CERB, pre-payment controls were introduced to stop applicants from receiving duplicate benefits.
Service Canada and the CRA worked together to ensure that those situations were addressed and payments to eligible clients did not exceed the maximum allowable benefits. To prevent these situations from continuing, CRA conducted a validation check at the application stage. If the applicant had already been approved for benefits with Service Canada, they would not have been able to continue further with the CRA-CERB application.
While there will not be any penalty for Canadians if they received a payment in error, they will be required to repay the CERB benefits for which they were not entitled and may have already received a letter from CRA providing them with further information about the repayment process. Specifically, if they have received the CERB twice for the same benefit period, they are requested to return one of the payments to the CRA. Canadians are strongly encouraged to file their 2020 tax returns by the filing deadline.
As new data sources such as tax returns and records of employment become available, Service Canada and CRA will be identifying additional individuals who may have been ineligible for the benefit.
Service Canada uses data analytics and intelligence capabilities to actively monitor and identify cases of fraud.
In addition, the Department has been working closely with key partners, including other government departments and law enforcement agencies, to detect and disrupt cases of possible fraud.
Verification of eligibility will follow the tax season to determine next steps. The first priority will be to identify and take measures against those who may have knowingly engaged in fraud/abused the system. Part of the plan includes providing relief to vulnerable individuals who may be adversely impacted. Upon further review, tailored repayment solutions may be required to address various circumstances where benefit repayment may affect in particular, low-income individuals.
Additionally, ESDC is actively working on investigating cases linked to potential fraudulent claims of the CERB. The time it takes to conduct and complete an investigation of a fraudulent claim will vary based on individual circumstances. As a result, it is difficult to estimate the time it will take to complete the investigations linked to fraudulent claims.
The 2020 Fall Economic Statement announced multi-year funding to address CERB fraud for ESDC and the Canada Revenue Agency. ESDC has put in place a multi-year plan for investigations focusing on areas of highest risk.
Prepared by
Name: Jonathan Larocque
Title: Director, Strategic Directions, Benefits and Integrated Services Branch
Key contact
Name: Michael MacPhee
Title: Director General, Employment Insurance Benefits Processing, Benefits and Integrated Services Branch
Phone number: 819-654-7571
Approved by
Name: Cliff Groen
Title: Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Benefits and Integrated Services Branch
Phone number: (819) 654-6944
Date
Date approved in SADMO / COO: 2021/04/09
8. Cost of EI-Emergency Response Benefit (EI-ERB), Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB), and Canada Recovery Benefits (CRB, CRCB, CRSB)
Issue
What is the latest website information for EI-ERB, CERB, CRB, CRCB, and CRSB (spend-to-date, number of unique applicants)?
Key facts
- The CERB benefits statistics are updated on the following website:
https://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/ei/claims-report.html - The Canada Recovery Benefits statistics are updated by CRA on the following websites:
CRB: https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/benefits/recovery-benefit/crb-statistics.html
CRCB: https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/benefits/recovery-caregiving-benefit/crcb-statistics.html
CRSB: https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/benefits/recovery-sickness-benefit/crsb-statistics.html - Note - This document should be used as a reference to report cumulative costs related to EI-ERB, CERB, CRB, CRCB, and CRSB. To avoid reconciliation and timing issues, it should supersede any previous house cards with cost information. This document contains publically available information and will be updated as required.
Response
The following CERB data is from the website listed above as of October 4, 2021:
- the total dollar value of CERB benefit payments is $74.08B, with 8.9M unique applicants
- of this total, $45.04B is CERB (CRA administered) and $29.04B is EI-ERB (ESDC administered)
The following CRB data from the websites listed above is as of March 28, 2021:
Program
CRB
Spending to Date
$13.4B
Unique Applicants
1,827,750
Program
CRCB
Spending to Date
$1.86B
Unique Applicants
361,790
Program
CRSB
Spending to Date
$391.4M
Unique Applicants
447,750
Prepared by
Name: Jennifer Moorehead
Title: Senior Director, Planning and Expenditure Management
Phone Number: 613-793-3084
Key contact
Name: Jason Won
Title: Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Chief Financial Officer Branch
Phone number: 613-295-2555
Approved by
Name: Mark Perlman
Title: Chief Financial Officer, Chief Financial Officer Branch
Phone number: 819-654-6634
Date:
April 7, 2021
Date approved in SADMO / COO:
9. Canada Emergency Response Benefit overpayments
Issue
Employment and Social Development Canada’s response to CERB overpayments.
Key facts
- In March 2020, ESDC put a pause on collection activities for all ESDC debts, including Notice of Debts for all programs
- Issuance of Notice of Debts and Monthly Statements of Accounts (MSA) for ESDC debts resumed on November 1, 2020. A minimal number of Notice of Debts and MSAs were issued by ESDC for CERB overpayments. These statements were mainly addressed to clients who had provided a full or partial reimbursement of their overpayment
- On February 9, 2021, the Government announced that it is allowing self-employed individuals who applied for the CERB through the Canada Revenue Agency or ESDC, and whose net self-employment income was less than $5,000, to keep their CERB payments provided they meet all other eligibility requirements
- While clients can voluntarily pay amounts owing, no active collection activity of CERB overpayments is planned until late Fall 2021. For those affected, ESDC will offer flexibility to clients in establishing a payment plan
Response
- The federal government is committed to continuing to support Canadians throughout this crisis
- The Government understands there may be situations in which Canadians received a CERB payment to which they were not eligible
- ESDC takes the integrity of its programs very seriously and remains committed to the financial stewardship of its programs
- While there will not be any penalty for Canadians if they have received a payment in error, they may be required to repay the CERB benefits for which they are not eligible
- Clients in this situation may have received a letter providing them with further information to make arrangements to repay any applicable amounts
- We would like to reassure Canadians that there is a continued pause of collection activities of EI emergency response benefit debts for the coming months
Background
On April 6, 2020, the Government launched the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) to provide temporary income support to workers who had stopped working and were without employment or self-employment income, for reasons related to COVID-19. Through this benefit, eligible workers who lost their job or were unable to work due to COVID-19 received $500 per week.
ESDC and the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) jointly administered the CERB to ensure that Canadians received the money they were entitled to as quickly as possible. However, there may be situations in which Canadians received a CERB payment to which they were not eligible.
Claimants may need to return or be required to repay the CERB if they:
- returned to work earlier than expected, including being paid retroactively
- applied for CERB but later realized they were not eligible, or
- applied for and received the CERB from both ESDC and CRA for the same period
While there will not be any penalty for Canadians if they received a payment in error, they may be required to repay the CERB benefits for which they were not entitled and may have already received a letter providing them with further information about the repayment process. Specifically, if they have received the CERB twice for the same benefit period, they are requested to return one of the payments to the CRA. To support this process, Canadians are strongly encouraged to file their 2020 tax returns by the filing deadline.
ESDC and the CRA worked together to ensure that those situations were reconciled and payments to eligible clients did not exceed the maximum allowable benefits. To prevent these situations from continuing, CRA conducted a validation check at the application stage. If the applicant had already been approved for benefits with ESDC, they would not have been able to continue further with the CRA-CERB application.
In March 2020, ESDC put a pause on collection activities for all of ESDC debts, including Notice of Debts for all programs. This decision was made to focus on supporting Canadians rather than establishing new overpayments.
On September 27, 2020, ESDC began transitioning clients from CERB to a simplified EI program, and put in place new temporary measures for 1 year to facilitate access to the EI program.
Issuance of Notice of Debts and Monthly Statements of Accounts for ESDC debts resumed on November 1, 2020. A minimal number of Notice of Debts and Monthly Statements of Accounts were issued for CERB overpayments issued by ESDC, mainly for clients who had provided a full or partial reimbursement of their overpayment. No active collection activity of CERB overpayments is planned until late fall 2021.
The information provided in this card is specific to ESDC only. Issues pertaining to CRA collection activities should be addressed to CRA.
If pressed on net vs. gross income for self-employment income:
On December 6, 2020, articles in the media raised questions on whether the $5,000 in income required to be eligible for CERB is net or gross for the purposes of self-employed individuals.
The CRA website for CERB eligibility included the following information.
Small Business owners can receive income from their business in different ways, including as salary, business income or dividends. In determining their eligibility for the CERB:
- owners who take a salary from their business should consider their pre-tax salary
- owners who rely on business income should consider their net pre-tax income (gross income less expenses)
- owners who rely on dividend income should consider this as self-employment income provided it comes from non-eligible dividends (generally, those paid out of corporate income taxed at the small business rate)
In some cases, self-employed individuals had declared their total business revenue, rather than their personal self-employment income in attesting that they made $5,000 in 2019. These individuals subsequently received education letters from the CRA indicating that they may not have met the requirements for the benefit.
On February 9, 2021 the Government announced that it is allowing self-employed individuals who applied for the CERB through the CRA or ESDC, and whose net self-employment income was less than $5,000, to keep their CERB payments provided they meet all other eligibility requirements.
Some self-employed individuals whose net self-employment income was less than $5,000 may have already voluntarily repaid the CERB. The CRA and ESDC will return the repaid amounts to impacted individuals. The exact process by which this will occur and the timelines within which it will be implemented are still being determined.
This approach provides a targeted resolution specifically for self-employed individuals who applied in good faith and received benefits based on unclear eligibility information provided by the Government.
Prepared by
Name: Jonathan Larocque
Title: Director, Strategic Directions Directorate
Key contact
Name: Nisa Tummon
Title: Director General, Strategic Directions Directorate
Phone number: 873-396-1062
Approved by
Name: Cliff Groen
Title: Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Benefits and Integrated Services Branch
Phone number: 819-654-6944
Date approved in COOO: April 9, 2021
10. CERB Integrity
Issue
The Auditor General has stated that the Government should have ways to identify fraud and recoup money for the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) and employment-insurance (EI) benefits during the pandemic.
Suggested Response
- Service Canada takes the integrity of its programs very seriously
- We know that in time of crisis, the risk of fraud is heightened and we continue to conduct investigations to identify and address cases of fraud
- Service Canada uses data analytics and intelligence capabilities to actively monitor and identify cases of fraud
- In addition, the Department has been working closely with key partners, including other government departments and law enforcement agencies, to detect and disrupt cases of possible fraud
- In cases where claimants are found to be ineligible to receive the Canada Emergency Response Benefit, they will be required to reimburse the overpayment
- The Government's Fall Economic Statement announced $260 million over 4 years for ESDC and the CRA to increase the capacity to detect, investigate and address cases of misrepresentation or fraud related to the Canada Emergency Response Benefit
- This investment will ensure the proper stewardship of the program
Background
In order to deal with the high volumes of applications and get money to eligible Canadians as quickly as possible during the pandemic, a number of temporary measures were implemented to simplify policy and processes while maintaining the integrity of the EI program through largely post-payment verification. Simplification measures included moving to a flat rate and the use of attestations over the requirement for documentation.
Post-payment verification reviews will help us develop accurate estimates of fraud.
The Government's Fall Economic Statement announced $260.4 million over 4 years for Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) and the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to increase the capacity to detect, investigate and address cases of fraud or misrepresentation related to the Canada Emergency Response.
From this, $114.3 million is to ensure that ESDC continues to have the capacity to effectively detect, investigate and address high-risk cases of abuse, misrepresentation and fraud in the Employment Insurance Emergency Response Benefit (EI ERB); and $146.1 million for the CRA to ensure it has continued capacity to advance compliance, verification and collections activities with respect to the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB).
Prepared by
Name: Donna Blois
Title: Executive Director, National Enforcement and Intelligence Division
Key contact
Name: Kathleen Walford
Title: Director General, Integrity Operations
Approved by
Name: Lori MacDonald
Title: COO
Date
Date approved by COOO: April 8, 2021
11. Provinces and Territories Clawing Back Social Assistance Benefits
Issue
Most provincial/territorial governments deduct amounts from Social Assistance benefits to reflect clients receiving certain federal benefits such as Employment Insurance and other emergency federal COVID-19 income supports.
Response
- Collaboration between different orders of government has been a keystone of Canada's approach to this global pandemic
- The Government of Canada has taken immediate, significant and decisive actions to help Canadians facing hardship as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic
- It is also important to recognize that the provinces and territories have full jurisdiction over how federal benefits are treated within their own programming, including social assistance
- We will continue to work with provincial and territorial governments to help Canadians through this crisis
Background
Most Provincial/Territorial (P/T) governments allow Social Assistance (SA) recipients to earn a certain amount of additional income through work while remaining eligible for SA benefits. Some SA recipients (including some recipients with disabilities) would have met the earnings requirements for federal emergency/recovery benefits, as well as for Employment Insurance benefits. However, P/T governments have the authority to deduct federal emergency/recovery benefit income from SA benefits because the administration of SA programs is under their jurisdiction.
In April 2020, Ministers Qualtrough and Hussen wrote letters to their P/T counterparts requesting that Canada Emergency Recovery Benefit income be fully exempt when determining eligibility and benefits under social assistance in order to maximize support to vulnerable Canadians.
Prepared by
Eric Dugas
Policy Analyst
Key contact
Richard Archambault
Manager, Strategic Policy
873-355-3951
Approved by
Poppy Vineberg
A/Senior Director 613-324-2433
Date
April 9, 2021
12. CERB Statistics Website – $7B variance
What is the latest website information for CRB, CRCB, and CRSB (spend-to-date, number of unique applicants)?
- Total Canada Emergency Response Benefit (delivered by Service Canada and Canada Revenue Agency, combined) and EI benefits as of October 4, 2020 can be found on the following website: https://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/ei/claims-report.html
- In April 2020, the government began weekly publishing on the Canada.ca website consolidated CERB and non-CERB EI payment data. This was done to meet commitments for transparency in reporting. At that time, it was not possible to quickly separate non-CERB EI payment data from CERB payment data for public reporting purposes
- As a result, the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) data published on the Canada.ca website reported, up until February 16, CERB and EI expenditures together, showing a total expenditure of $81.64 billion. A note was included on the website to document the data limitation
- ESDC has worked to disaggregate CERB and non-CERB EI payments to allow more accurate reporting of CERB expenditures. The website was revised on Feb 16 and now reports the numbers in the Department's data system reports for CERB payments, which total $74.08 billion as of October 4, 2020 (in other words the end date of the program). The difference of $7.56 billion represents non-CERB EI payments that were made until October 4, 2020
- ESDC has also updated the Canada.ca website to include an additional footnote to clarify the changes to the previously reported total costs for CERB as of October 4, 2020. In addition, work will continue in order to update the website for applications received after October 4, 2020 for retroactive benefits paid
- The website shows benefits paid of $74.08B. The $76.5B in Supps C reflects the estimate Finance put in the FES. The $76.5B also includes operating costs
- The total EI non-CERB of $7.56B includes: applications for which the benefit start date was prior to March 15, 2020; applications to renew claims that were active prior to this date; or applications for special benefits (such as Family Caregiver Benefits, Compassionate Care Benefits, Parental and Maternity benefits)
Prepared by
Name: Jennifer Moorehead
Title: Senior Director, Planning and Expenditure Management, CFOB
Phone number: 819-654-6402
Key contact
Name: Jason Won
Title: Deputy Chief Financial Officer, Chief Financial Officer Branch
Phone number: 613-295-2555
Approved by
Name: Mark Perlman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Phone number: 819-654-6634
Date: April 1, 2021
13. Description and costing of ESDC COVID measures (announced)
Training/Transfer to PTs
Measure
Additional investment of $1.5B in the WDAs with PTs
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$1.5B 2020 to 2021
Additional Information
[Redacted]
Measure
Additional flexibilities under the WDA and LMDA
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
N/A
Additional Information
Broadened eligible expenditures to include upgrades of physical spaces to meet new health and safety requirements and enhanced wrap-around supports to individuals.
Allow PTs to carry forward up to 20% in unspent funds from their total funding allocation from 2020 to 2021 to 2021 to 2022 for both the LMDAs and WDAs.
Temporary changes to the timing of 2020 to 2021 transfer payments and the related PTs deliverables to allow funds to flow sooner under the WDA and LMDA.
A temporary change to the definition of an "insured participant" to allow PTs to be able to provide skills training and employment supports under the LMDA to these claimants.
Measure
Training
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
[Redacted]
Additional Information
In 2021 to 2022 and targeting Indigenous Skills and Employment Training Program ($144.2M), the Foreign Credential Recognition Program ($15M), the Opportunities Fund for Persons with Disabilities ($65M); and in 2021 to 2022 and 2022 to 2023, targeting the Women's Employment Readiness Canada pilot project ($50M over 2 years).
Employment Insurance
Measure
Waive the 1-week waiting period for EI sickness from Sept 27 2020 to Sept 25 2021
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
ESDC did not seek funding for this item
Additional Information
$5M
Measure
Waive the waiting period for all EI benefits from January 31, 2021 to Sept 25, 2021
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$106.3M in 2020 to 2021
$213.8M in 2021 to 2022
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Waive the requirement to provide a medical certificate to access EI sickness benefits between Sept 27 2020 to Sept 25, 2021
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
No cost associated
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Extension of the Work-Sharing Program
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
Operating Funding:
- $4.8M in 2020 to 2021
- $4.4M in 2021 to 2022
Additional Information
Since February 28, 2020 and as of March 28, 2021, 7,469 Work-Sharing (WS) applications have been received. Of those applications, 4,361 WS agreements have been approved, representing an estimated total agreement value of $1.5 billion. The agreements have supported over 131,000 participants and averted about 61,000 layoffs
Measure
Temporary Changes to EI to Improve Access:
- minimum benefit floor of $500/week
- hours credit (300 for regular benefits and 480 for special benefits)
- fixed unemployment rate of 13.1%
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
Included in the EI account forecasted benefit spending
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Extending Employment Insurance Regular Benefits by up to 24 weeks
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
Operating Funding:
- $22.2M in 2021 to 2022
- $1.4M in 2022 to 2023
- total: $22.6M
Additional Information
N/A
Non-EI Eligible
Measure
Canadian Emergency Response Benefit (CERB)
Retroactivity ended December 2
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
Revised authority
$76.5B in 2020 to 2021
[Redacted]
Additional Information
As of October 4th, 2020, (CRA and EI combined):
- 8.9m applicants
- $81.64B in combined benefits ($74B CERB and 7.6B in EI benefits)
Measure
Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB)
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
Revised authority:
- $10.1B in 2020 to 2021
- $3.4B in 2021 to 2022 pending revision
- total:$13.5B
Additional Information
As of March 5, 2021, since launch:
- 12,004,240 applications
- 1,781,370 unique applicants
- $12.0B total gross amount
Measure
Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit (CRSB)
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
Revised authority:
- $780M in 2020 to 2021
- $2.4B in 2021 to 2022 pending revision
- total $3.2B
Additional Information
As of March 5, 2021, since launch:
- 727,130 applications
- 420,680 unique applicants
- $363.57M total gross amount
Measure
Canada Recovery Caregiving Benefit (CRCB)
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
Revised authority:
- $2.9B 2020 to 2021
- $4.5B in 2021 to 2022
- total $7.4B
Additional Information
As of March 5, 2021, since launch:
- 3,301,170 applications
- 347,450 unique applicants
- $1.65B total gross amount
Measure
Integrity related to the CERB and CESB, including administration costs
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$211M 2021 to 2022
$101M 2022 to 2023
$73M 2023 to 2024
$59M 2024 to 2025
Total:$444M
Additional Information
N/A
Temporary Foreign Workers
Measure
TFW Program
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$4M 2020 to 2021
Additional Information
To date, $2.79M has been spent, representing a total of 2,787 positions refunded over a total of 677 LMIAs.
Measure
Protecting the health and safety of farm workers
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$23.6 in 2020 to 2021
Additional Information
$7.4 million to increase supports to temporary foreign workers, including $6 million for direct outreach to workers delivered through migrant worker support organizations. To date $5.3 million has been provided through contribution agreements.
$16.2 million to strengthen the employer compliance regime, particularly on farms, and making improvements to how tips and allegations of employer non-compliance are addressed. This funding has included conducting an additional 3,000 inspections.
Students
Measure
Canada Emergency Student Benefit
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
Revised authority:
- $3.03B 2020 to 2021
[Redacted]
Additional Information
$1,250/month
$2,000/month if have dependant(s) or a disability
The CESB provided $2.95 billion to over 709,000 students and recent graduates.
Measure
Canada Student Loan Program – Repayment Moratorium
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$186M 2020 to 2021
Part of the CSLP statutory forecast.
Additional Information
Paused from March 30 2020 to September 30, 2020. Approximately 1.3 million student loan borrowers benefited.
Measure
Double the Canada Student Grants (2020 to 2021 school year)
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$1.55B 2020 to 2021
Part of the CSLP statutory forecast.
Additional Information
Up to $6000 for full-time students
Up to $3600 for part-time students
Doubling of the Canada Student Grant for Students with a Permanent Disability and Students with Dependants
Measure
No student or spousal contribution in 2020 to 2021 for student loans/grants
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$88.7M 2020 to 2021
Part of the CSLP statutory forecast.
Additional Information
Average student $1700 (max $3000)
Average spousal $3000 (up to 10% family)
Measure
Increase the maximum weekly amount of Canada Student Loans from $210 to $350 for 2020 to 2021 school year
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$286.7M 2020 to 2021
Part of the CSLP statutory forecast.
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Supports for Student Learning Program
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$15M in 2020 to 2021 pursuant to section (2)1 of the Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act, and concurrence from the Minister of Finance and Minister of Health to access funding from the Consolidated Revenue Fund
Additional Information
Support for an anticipated 14,700 vulnerable children and youth to persist in their studies, complete high school and transition to post-secondary education. Funding has helped 7 organizations in the after-school space to digitize delivery of wraparound supports, such as tutoring and mentoring, and increase students' access to laptops and internet services.
Measure
Medical and Parental Leave for student loan borrowers
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$8.7M 2020 to 2021
Part of the CSLP statutory forecast.
Additional Information
Effective October 1, 2020, the Government of Canada introduced a new Medical and Parental Leave for students taking temporary leave from their studies for medical or parental reasons, including mental health reasons. It offers interest and payment-free for 6-month periods, up to a maximum of 18 consecutive months.
Measure
Elimination of Interest on Student Loans (1-year)
April 2021 to March 2022
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$329.4M 2021 to 2022
Part of the CSLP statutory forecast.
Additional Information
Eliminate the interest on repayment of the Canada Student Loans and Canada Apprentice Loans for 2021 to 2022
Youth
Measure
Youth Employment and Skills Strategy (YESS) is a horizontal initiative delivered by ESDC and 10 other departments, Crown corporations and Agencies
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
[Redacted]
Additional Information
Provide approximately 45,300 job placements in 2021 to 2022 for young people
COVID-19 funding in 2020 to 2021 provided an additional 13,600 placements
Measure
Student Work Placement Program
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$266.1M 2020 to 2021
Additional Information
Support up to 340,000 work-integrated learning opportunities in 2020 to 2021 (15,000 opportunities with base funding more then 25,000 opportunities with COVID-19 investments).
Measure
Changes to the Canada Summer Jobs program
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$447.5M 2021 to 2022
$61.7M 2020 to 2021
Additional Information
Support up to 120,000 job placements through Canada Summer Jobs in 2021 to 2022 – an increase of 40,000 from 2020 to 2021 levels (when excluding COVID additional 10,000 work placements).
Measure
Canada Student Service Grant
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
Authority forecast revised in Supplementary Estimates B to $0
Additional Information
In July 2020, WE Charity Foundation withdrew from delivery of the Canada Student Service Grant (CSSG). Following this, the Contribution Agreement with the WE Charity Foundation was terminated. The $30M in funds that were advanced to WE Charity Foundation have been returned to the Government of Canada.
The Government did not move forward with the CSSG.
Measure
Canada Service Corps Micro Grant
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
[Redacted]
Additional Information
ESDC was negotiating a COVID-specific contribution agreement to deliver on the commitment to expand the number of available micro-grants from 1,800 to 15,000. In August 2020, it was determined that the project was no longer feasible.
Early Learning and Child Care
Measure
Federal Secretariat
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
[Redacted]
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Indigenous Early Learning and Child Care Secretariat
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
[Redacted]
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Transfer to PTs and Indigenous organizations
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
[Redacted]
Additional Information
Based on 2027 to 2028 funding level
Measure
ECE Workforce
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
[Redacted]
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Emergency Community Support Fund
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
[Redacted]
Additional Information
$80M – Red Cross
$157M – United Way
$112M – Community Foundations
$1M O and M
Measure
Supporting people experiencing homelessness (ESDC)
Supporting women and children fleeing violence (WAGE + ISC)
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$15M 2019 to 2020
$394M 2020 to 2021
Total $409.2M
2021 to 2022 funding - [Redacted]
Not ESDC measure
Additional Information
$157.5M – Reaching Home – Round 1
$236.7M – Reaching Home – Round 2
$15M (2019 to 2020) – departmental lapses
$299.4M – Reaching Home – FES announcement (continued emergency funding + prevention of homelessness)
$40M through WAGE
$10M through Indigenous Services Canada
Measure
Addressing Labour Shortages in Long-Term and Home Care
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$25.3M 2020 to 2021
$13.2M 2021 to 2022
Total $38.5M
Additional Information
N/A
Seniors
Measure
One-time payment for Seniors
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$2.5B 2020 to 2021
Additional Information
Tax free $300 for seniors eligible for the OAS and additional $200 for GIS and Allowance recipients
Measure
Supporting organizations that provide essential services to seniors
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$9M 2019 to 2020
Additional Information
Through the United Way
Measure
New flexibilities under the New Horizons for Seniors Program
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$20M 2020 to 2021
Additional Information
Community Based Projects
Measure
Extending GIS and Allowance payments
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
N/A
Additional Information
Temporarily extending GIS and Allowance payments if seniors' 2019 income information has not been received.
Measure
One Time Payment to Persons with Disabilities
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$849M 2020 to 2021
$11M 2021 to 2022
Total: $860M
Additional Information
A one-time, tax-free, non-reportable, payment of up to $600 (seniors eligible for OAS, would receive $300; for OAS and GIS, $100) to help with extra costs incurred by persons with disabilities because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
To date more than 1.7 million persons with disabilities have benefitted from the OTP.
The first batch of payments was released on October 30, 2020 to the majority of eligible Canadians with disabilities. The second batch of payments was issued in January 2021, and a third, and final batch of 65,000 payments are expected to be released April 23 2021.
Measure
Providing resources to improve workplace accessibility and access to jobs
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$15M 2020 to 2021
Additional Information
For community organizations to improve workplace accessibility
Measure
COVID-19 Disability Advisory Group
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
N/A
Additional Information
The Government of Canada established the COVID-19 Disability Advisory Group, comprised of experts in disability inclusion, to provide advice on: the lived experiences of persons with disabilities during this crisis; along with disability specific issues; challenges and systemic gaps; and strategies, measures and steps to be taken in response, in keeping with a "Nothing Without Us" approach. With a recently renewed and expanded mandate, the Advisory Group will build on previous work advising the Minister and provide ongoing expert advice on disability inclusion within Government priorities and on implementation of Government programs and policies.
Measure
Funding to Support Communications and Engagement Activities Related to COVID-19
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$1.1M funded internally within ESDC
Additional Information
Funding to national disability organizations through the Social Development Partnership Program - Disability Component in order to tailor communications and engagement activities to the varying needs of persons with disabilities in addressing the impact of COVID-19.
Measure
Waive the requirement to provide a medical certificate to access the medical leave
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
No cost associated
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Leave related to COVID-19
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
No cost associated
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Extend the periods for temporary lay-offs
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
No cost associated
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Improving our Ability to Reach All Canadians
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$16M 2020 to 2021
$16M 2021 to 2022
Total: $32M
Additional Information
1-800-O-Canada
Canada.ca
Indigenous Outreach
Measure
Supporting the Ongoing Delivery of Key Benefits
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$13M 2020 to 2021
Additional Information
Resumption of In-Person Access to Services
Measure
Funding to support business resumption for federally regulated employers
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$0.5M 2020 to 2021
$2M 2021 to 2022
Total: $2.5M
Additional Information
N/A
Measure
Covid-19 Communication and Marketing
Funding Decision
[Redacted]
Authority
$900K 2020 to 2021
Additional Information
Essential Services Jobs/Job Bank advertising campaign
The Auditor General's report on CERB states that GBA+ was considered as part of the delivery of the CERB. Members of the Committee may wish to have more information on the timing of the conduct of GBA+ and the impact that it had on the development and delivery of the CERB.
- As CERB was being delivered, Employment and Social Development Canada considered GBA+ to assess how Canadian workers were being supported by the benefit. This fact was noted in section 6.37 of the Auditor General's report
- Publicly available data on CERB and EI benefit recipients found that, as of October 4th, 2020, claims are approximately gender-balanced (51.4% males vs. 48.5% females). A small proportion of recipients (0.1%) were gender diverse. Gender diverse was defined, for the purpose of these statistics, as applicants whose gender was either not disclosed or who are non-binary
- The department of Employment and Social Development considered GBA+ both during the development of CERB, and as the benefit was being delivered
- The decision to include EI maternity and parental benefits as part of the $5,000 income threshold for eligibility primarily benefitted women
- GBA+ considerations also help informed the decision to set the income eligibility threshold at as low as $5,000. This benefited a large number of low-income workers, which therefore helped women who on average are overrepresented in lower paying jobs than men
- The GBA+ conducted in June 2020 found that:
- although a larger portion of women were eligible for CERB than are typically eligible under EI, woman may continue to disproportionately feel the impacts of childcare closures and job losses in female-dominated industries such as the services sector. Despite flexible eligibility criteria for CERB, women were more likely not to have earned the required minimum of $5,000 in the last 12 months or in 2019
- CERB eligibility rules are more flexible than traditional EI rules, which likely facilitated access to the benefit for self-employed individuals and recent immigrants, including women, given that income can be earned from self-employment or be earned overseas in that the employment income can be earned from self-employment or be earned overseas
A comprehensive GBA+ assessment was conducted in June 2020, as the benefit was being delivered. However, from the start, GBA+ considerations influenced the CERB. Without that GBA+ lens, the Government would or could have come up with different rules affecting negatively some groups and making them worse compared to the observed outcomes.
The source income to determine eligibility for CERB included maternity and parental benefits (which mostly benefit women) was part of the $5,000 threshold for eligibility is an illustration that GBA+ analysis was taken into consideration in the design of the CERB in the development phase. Likewise, the fact that the income eligibility threshold was set at as low as $5,000 benefited a large number of low-income workers, which therefore helped women who on average earn less than men.
The GBA+ conducted in June 2020 found that although a larger portion of women were eligible for CERB than are typically eligible under EI, woman may continue to disproportionately feel the impacts of childcare closures and job losses in female-dominated industries such as the services sector.
CERB eligibility rules are more flexible than traditional EI rules in that the employment income can be earned from self-employment or be earned overseas. This facilitated access to CERB for self-employed individuals and recent immigrants, including women.
In July 2020, the department responded to a request for documentation pertaining to the CERB audit that was performed by the Office of the Auditor General. The request asked for information pertaining to "Any analysis related to the design of the CERB, for example, options considered, controls, uptake, eligibility, length of benefit, outreach, fraud prevention, overlap with other benefits, and so on."
As part of this request, the department submitted information on how GBA+ was considered in the design and delivery of CERB. GBA+ was only briefly mentioned in the Auditor General's report.
Section 6.37 of the Auditor General's report on the CERB:
"We also found that, as the benefit was being delivered, the Department of Finance Canada and Employment and Social Development Canada considered gender-based analysis plus to assess how Canadian workers were being supported by the benefit. The departments considered recipient data through different demographic profiles, such as age, occupation type, and gender. The Department of Finance Canada also considered the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals and how they were related to the emergency nature of the benefit."
Prepared by
Name: Alexandra Neufeldt
Title: Policy officer
Key contact
Name: Sarah Wiles
Title: Director, GBA+ Centre of Expertise
Phone number: 613-793-5256
Approved by
Name: Colin Spencer James
Title: DG, Corporate Planning and Management Directorate
Phone number: 613-240-0691
Date
Date approved in SADMO / COO: April 8, 2019
From: Department of Finance Canada
News release
March 18, 2021 - Ottawa, Ontario - Department of Finance Canada
Today, the Department of Finance Canada welcomed the International Monetary Fund (IMF)'s Staff Report for the 2021 Article IV Consultation to conclude its annual Article IV mission to Canada. The report, which is consistent with the IMF's preliminary findings released last month, continues to highlight Canada's "decisive actions and unprecedented fiscal support," which has helped to limit economic scarring and protect jobs while supporting Canadians and businesses through the pandemic.
The report observed that "Canada's strong history of prudent policymaking afforded it the policy space to respond forcefully to the crisis, helping it to contain the socio-economic impact of the pandemic."
The IMf estimates that without COVID-19: Financial support, "real output would have declined by an additional 7.8 percentage points in 2020 and the unemployment rate would have been 3.2 percentage points higher."
The IMF currently projects Canada's real GDP to expand by 4.4% in 2021 and 4.1% in 2022.
The IMF conducted analysis which shows that had the federal government not acted with its decisive and substantial support, Canada would have reached a similar level of gross debt-to-GDP ratio from reduced output, but there would have been a much broader loss of jobs and GDP.
The IMF acknowledged that Canada's net debt remains low and that "Canada still does not have substantial fiscal vulnerabilities, partly due to its strong pre-crisis fiscal position and its sizable asset position."
The report noted that "public health policies and spending were instrumental in containing the initial spread of the virus. . . Crucially, the public health response has been guided by science and expert advice."
The IMF advised that "As the economy transitions from crisis mode to recovery, it is vitally important to keep the spread of COVID-19 under control, and to avoid premature withdrawal of fiscal and monetary support."
Quick facts
- The IMF's annual Article IV missions assess the economic and financial developments in a country and include discussions with government officials, central bank officials, parliamentarians and representatives of business, labour unions, and civil society
- Canada entered the pandemic in a position of strength, with the lowest net debt-to-GDP ratio among G7 peers, a position it still retains
- Select COVID-19 support measures by the numbers:
- Canada Emergency Response Benefit: over 8 million Canadians supported through direct payments of $81.6 billion
- Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy: $69.31 billion in subsidies to support 433,950 employers and help protect over 5.2 million jobs as of March 7
- Canada Emergency Business Account: $44.41 billion for 846,350 loans to businesses across Canada as of March 11
- Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy and Lockdown Support: $1.97 billion in subsidies for 138,550 organizations as of March 7
- Canada Recovery Benefit: $12 billion provided to 1.76 million Canadians as of March 5
- Canada Recovery Caregiving Benefit: $1.65 billion provided to 347,450 Canadians as of March 5; and
- Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit: $363 million provided to 420,680 Canadians as of March 5
Associated links
Contacts
Media may contact:
media Relations
Department of Finance Canada
fin.media-media.fin@canada.ca
613-369-4000
General enquiries
Phone: 613-369-3710
Facsimile: 613-369-4065
TTY: 613-369-3230
E-mail: fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca
Canada - Staff Concluding Statement of the 2021 Article IV Mission February 16, 2021
A Concluding Statement describes the preliminary findings of IMF staff at the end of an official staff visit (or 'mission'), in most cases to a member country. Missions are undertaken as part of regular (usually annual) consultations under Article IV of the IMF's Articles of Agreement, in the context of a request to use IMf resources (borrow from the IMF), as part of discussions of staff monitored programs, or as part of other staff monitoring of economic developments.
The authorities have consented to the publication of this statement. The views expressed in this statement are those of the IMF staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF's Executive Board. Based on the preliminary findings of this mission, staff will prepare a report that, subject to management approval, will be presented to the IMF Executive Board for discussion and decision.
Washington, DC: The Canadian economy was operating at close to capacity and had strong policy buffers when the COVID-19 pandemic hit. The authorities took strong and well-coordinated policy actions at the onset of the pandemic that provided crucial support to the economy and the functioning of financial markets, and helped protect lives and livelihoods. The nascent recovery that started when virus-related restrictions began to be eased last Spring has slowed as renewed restrictions were deployed to mitigate a second wave of the virus. Going forward, as the vaccination program proceeds and the economy transitions from crisis mode to recovery, it would be vitally important to contain the spread of COVID-19, and to avoid a premature withdrawal of policy support. The federal government's approach to the withdrawal of policy stimulus is a step in the right direction, but clear and credible communication about the path to normalcy will be key. Beyond the pandemic, it remains necessary to continue implementing structural reforms to increase the productive capacity of the economy and promote sustainable and inclusive growth.
Policy Response to COVID-19
The authorities took timely, decisive, and well-coordinated policy actions in response to the pandemic. Canada's strong history of prudent policymaking afforded it the policy space to respond forcefully to the crisis and avert much steeper declines in economic activity and employment. The size and scope of policy support has been unprecedented. Direct fiscal support provided by the federal government is expected to amount to almost 15 percent of GDP and includes spending on healthcare, and support for households, firms, and vulnerable groups through cash transfers and wage subsidies. In addition, the federal government provided liquidity support through tax deferrals, credit facilities, and loan guarantees. At the same time, the Bank of Canada responded by cutting its policy interest rate to an historical low and announced a range of programs to support liquidity in the financial system. An array of other financial sector policies was also deployed to support banks, insurers, and pension funds.
From Crisis Management to Supporting the Recovery
The path of the recovery is inexorably linked to the evolution of the pandemic. Following an estimated contraction of 5.4% in 2020, real GDP is now projected to expand by 4.4% in 2021 as the pandemic fades. A more favorable growth projection than outlined in the January WEO update mainly reflects better-than-expected high frequency indicators. The outlook is, however, subject to both upside and downside risks. On the one hand, the adoption of fiscal stimulus in the United States, the size and timing of which remains uncertain, higher oil prices, and stronger-than-expected pent up domestic demand are important upside risks. On the other hand, the recovery could be delayed by new waves of the virus. Hence, swift vaccination of the population should remain a key short-term policy priority. However, even as rapid progress is made in vaccinating a large swathe of the population—which could realistically take several months—mitigation efforts must continue. These efforts should focus on reducing the risks associated with social contact while minimizing economic disruptions.
The crisis exposed gaps in Canada's social safety net that should be addressed. The significant job losses at the onset of the crisis put pressure on the employment insurance (EI) system, and many Canadians did not qualify for income support. These factors prompted the rapid rollout of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) to help fill the gaps. By the time the CERB expired in September 2020, 8.9 million people (almost a quarter of the population) had applied for the benefit. When the benefit ended, many of the CERB claimants transitioned to a newly revamped EI system, and those still not covered by the revamped system transitioned to temporary recovery benefits. The lessons from the crisis represent an excellent opportunity to review the EI system, including its role as an automatic stabilizer.
The federal government could consider developing a more systematic framework for cyclical stabilization. For instance, linking discretionary fiscal spending to a timely and well-understood macroeconomic variable that reflects the cyclical position of the economy (for example, the unemployment rate) could provide an automatic trigger for both initiating emergency spending and its withdrawal. These enhanced automatic stabilizers could maximize policy effectiveness over the business cycle and reduce uncertainty related to policy decisions. In the current context, for example, the expiration of some emergency support programs (for example, recovery benefits and wage subsidies) later this year could complicate decisions of households and firms, add to uncertainty, and potentially increase fiscal costs.
The federal government's data-driven approach to the withdrawal of policy stimulus (its "fiscal guardrails") is a welcome step in the right direction, but requires more clarity. The approach represents a strong signal of the authorities' commitment to avoid a premature withdrawal of policy support, which is welcome, but lack of information about the specific conditions that would trigger withdrawal complicates communication and could add to uncertainty.
Prior to embarking on any new spending, it would be important to ensure its composition achieves well-defined objectives, including enhancing long-term growth. The federal government's commitment to spend up to 4% of GDP over the next 3 years to support the recovery needs further justification. It has stated that the additional stimulus will be designed to provide the support the economy needs to operate at its full capacity and to stop COVID-19 from doing long-term damage to output. In this context, it is essential that the strength and durability of the recovery is evaluated against these objectives, as well as the government's broader policy agenda to boost long-term growth, before a commitment to a significant new spending initiative is made. While the government still has some fiscal space, the additional spending, if deemed unjustified, could weaken the credibility of the fiscal framework.
The federal government needs to elaborate and clearly communicate its medium-term fiscal objectives. While the federal fiscal support provided is well justified and more support may be needed as the pandemic wanes, fiscal risks have clearly risen. Commitment to a well thought-through debt anchor supported by a well-understood operational rule, or the regular publication of longer-term fiscal projections that clearly illustrate fiscal sustainability, would go a long way towards ensuring that credibility in the fiscal framework is maintained over the medium term. Fiscal objectives should also be clearly communicated at the provincial level, especially in those provinces with wide deficits and high levels of debt.
The central bank should continue to clearly communicate its strategy for both maintaining and eventually withdrawing policy support. Current monetary policy settings are well-aligned with the needs of the economy. Scaling back asset purchases and gradually lifting the policy rate to its estimated natural rate once the economy has recovered will promote financial stability and help to create policy space for the next downturn. Clear communication about future policy intentions will be key to managing expectations during the recovery.
Financial sector support should also be gradually phased out as the effects of the pandemic fade. While current macroprudential policy settings are broadly appropriate, policy tightening should carefully balance short-term risks against longer-term macro-financial vulnerabilities. Policy should help to mitigate a broad-based and persistent buildup of leverage and address vulnerabilities in the housing market.
Beyond the Pandemic—Supporting Sustainable and Inclusive Growth
Structural challenges that existed prior to the pandemic remain. Canada still needs to boost its productivity, support productivity-enhancing investments, and diversify beyond traditional sectors, including oil. Cutting regulatory barriers, reviewing the tax system to improve efficiency, and facilitating internal and international trade should remain on the list of key priorities. The federal government's "build back better" plan aims to foster an inclusive recovery by investing in training and skills, empowering women and minorities, and creating opportunities for vulnerable groups. While this is a welcome step, any new spending should also be evaluated against the government's broader policy objectives, including its desire to increase the productive capacity of the economy. Moreover, the federal government's emphasis on housing affordability is key for sustainable and inclusive growth, and should be supported by policies that focus on expanding the supply of housing.
Canada has pledged to become emissions neutral by 2050 and is implementing strong policies in line with this goal. The centerpiece is a requirement that provinces and territories implement a carbon price (or equivalent measures) rising to CAn $170 per ton by 2030. Energy-intensive, trade-exposed firms are covered by an output-based performance standard (OBPS). Carbon pricing is the most efficient policy for reducing emissions while returning the revenues to households in transparent tax relief helps with acceptability. The authorities could consider reinforcing mitigation incentives in sectors that are difficult to decarbonize through pricing alone (for example, transport, buildings, forestry, agriculture) with feebates—revenue-neutral sliding scales of fees/rebates on products with above/below average emission rates. A medium-term transition from the OBPS to a border carbon adjustment (BCA) could be considered. At the global level, Canada's carbon price floor could be a valuable prototype for an international carbon price floor arrangement among large emitting countries.
Welcome progress has been made towards implementing recommendations from the 2019 Financial Sector Assessment Program. Notably, information sharing and collaboration among financial oversight authorities has been enhanced through the establishment of the Systemic Risk Surveillance Committee in 2019. Going forward, it would be important to address other recommendations, including the enhancement of regulatory capital requirements for banks' mortgage exposures, which remains relevant amid continuously tight housing market conditions, and, in the near term, pandemic-related risks, which could affect the ability of households to service elevated levels of debt.
The mission would like to thank the authorities and all our other counterparts for the constructive and candid policy dialogue and productive collaboration.
IMF Communications Department
media Relations
Press Officer: Randa Elnagar
Phone: +1 202 623-7100 Email:media@imf.org
What is Government of Canada doing to improve the way it delivers benefits to Canadians, including efforts to improve and modernize its benefits delivery platform?
- Canada's social programs and benefits are governed by complex legislation, regulations and policies that have evolved over a 50-year period. Interpreting these complexities in computer code has led to equally complex, less robust and more rigid benefits delivery systems over time. The Government of Canada is working on borrowed time operating our current legacy systems – [one part of the sentence has been redacted]
- There are considerable costs and risks in continuing to extend the life of our systems. Challenges include costly maintenance and upgrades, coding complexities, data integrity and security issues, potential errors and mispayments, extended wait times for clients and reputational risk for government
- ESDC is investing in the Benefits Delivery Modernization (BDM) Programme to address the risk of system failures from aging IT and to provide improved service delivery to Canadians. BDM will streamline the structure, process, performance and client experience
- ESDC's legacy Information Technology (IT) systems are at the end of their lifecycle. They are becoming increasingly fragile, impeding the Department's ability to quickly implement policy, program and business process changes
- The BDM Programme is addressing the risk of technology debt and "rust-out" while continuing to provide Canadians with reliable and accurate EI, CPP and OAS benefits. Over time, the Programme will expand integrated self-service options, leading to better service, reduced wait times and streamlined application processes. Since March 2020, ESDC has been at the forefront of the Government of Canada's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. An early version of the technology that will be used for BDM was leveraged to deliver the one-time payment to persons with disabilities and the Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant, from policy decision to implementation in only 17 weeks. ESDC provided vulnerable Canadians cheques in their pockets quickly and demonstrated its ability to deliver new benefits on accelerated timeframes
- Next, BDM will create a new, scalable digital platform to make applying for benefits easier and faster. BDM is poised to begin implementation as early as this spring, with new benefits being on-boarded as early as 2022
Background
Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) is the largest federal service delivery organization in Canada, providing $136B in direct benefits to Canadians in 2019 to 2020 through the Employment Insurance (EI), Canada Pension Plan (CPP), and Old Age Security (OAS) programs. These benefits are essential to maintain a safety net for economically vulnerable Canadians, including low-income seniors, persons with disabilities, and workers who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own.
As a result of a succession of Budget investments, ESDC has made progress in addressing technical debt on EI, CPP and OAS and ensuring benefit payments continue to flow. The BDM Programme will ensure that ESDC can continue to deliver our mandate in the future.
The BDM Programme is a modern service delivery model that will standardize technology, process and operational models across EI, OAS and CPP. The BDM Programme goals are service excellence, policy agility and a transformed organization.
The BDM Programme benefits from industry expertise and lessons learned from other large IT transformation projects, including taking advantage of commercial off-the-shelf technology and agile project management practices. BDM's governance structure is well established, with clear decision-making authorities and escalation processes in place to effectively lead and govern the Programme.
BDM will improve processing speed and accuracy of payments, enhance program integrity, centralize program data and decrease operational costs. Regardless of channel, region or function, the enhanced functionalities of the new BDM solution will enable the Department to provide services that meet client needs and expectations.
The modernized platform is being implemented incrementally in 4 phases, over 10 years.
N/A
Key contact
Name: Ree Schwartz
Title: Manager, BDM Strategic Communications
Phone number: 613-406-8763
Approved by
Name: Susan Ingram
Title: DG, Enterprise Major Projects Execution
Phone number: 819-654-6163
Date
Date approved in SADMO / COO: April 07, 2021
17. CERB Performance Measurement Approach
Issue
What performance measurement approach has the Government taken to assess the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB)?
Key facts
- On April 6, 2020, the Government of Canada launched the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) to provide temporary income support to workers who stopped working or had their employment or self-employment income reduced for reasons related to COVID-19. Through this benefit, eligible workers who lost their job or were unable to work due to COVID-19 received $500 per week, for up to 28 weeks, between March 15, 2020, and October 3, 2020
- Service Canada and the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) jointly administered the CERB to ensure that Canadian workers received the money they were entitled to as quickly as possible
- As of October 4, 2020, the total dollar value of CERB benefit payments is $74.08B, with 8.9M unique applicants. Between ESDC and the CRA, 27.56M CERB applications were processed over the duration of the CERB program
- On March 25, 2021, the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) tabled its independent report on the development and delivery of the CERB in Parliament. This report presents the results of the OAG's CERB performance audit, which includes 2 recommendations that the Government has accepted. The first relates to finalizing and implementing post-payment verification for the CERB. The second calls for a formal assessment of the delivery of the CERB to apply the findings to the design and delivery of future government emergency response and recovery benefits
Response
- In response to the COVID-19 crisis, the Government provided direct and rapid income support to millions of Canadian workers impacted by closures and public health restrictions, by introducing the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) in a matter of weeks
- While the Department of Employment and Social Development is finalizing its performance measurement approach to assess the CERB, there are some key metrics currently available for the program. As of October 4, 2020, the total dollar value of CERB benefit payments is $74.08B, which supported 8.9M unique applicants. Between ESDC and the CRA, 27.56M CERB applications were processed over the duration of the CERB program. Further information on the performance measurement of the CERB program will be available in the coming months
- The Office of the Auditor General has undertaken a performance audit of the design and delivery of the CERB. The Government welcomes the Auditor General's report on the CERB. We are pleased with the findings that the rapid roll-out of income support through the CERB enabled Canadian workers to follow public health guidelines, and that focusing on post-payment verification helped to expedite benefit payments to Canadians when they needed them
- The Government also gratefully accepts the recommendations in the Auditor-General's report. Work is already underway to address the report's recommendations. A post-payment verification plan has been developed and initiated to ensure that those who received the benefit were eligible
- To support this work, the Government's Fall Economic Statement announced $260 million over 4 years for ESDC and the CRA to help detect, investigate and address cases of fraud or misrepresentation related to the CERB
- Additionally, work will begin on an assessment of the CERB's design and delivery. This will help the Government of Canada apply lessons learned for the design of future emergency response benefits
Background
The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) was an important and necessary temporary emergency response to support Canadian workers, including the self-employed, who stopped working due to COVID-19.
The CERB was delivered by the Canada Revenue Agency and Service Canada and provided a weekly amount of $500 for up to 28 weeks, between March 15, 2020, and October 3, 2020. The CERB followed a simplified attestation-based design with integrity applied at the back end, to provide rapid temporary income support to Canadians whose employment was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
While the Department of Employment and Social Development Canada is finalizing its performance measurement approach to assess the CERB, the Office of the Auditor General (OAG)’s independent report on the design and delivery of the CERB was tabled in Parliament on March 25, 2021.
As indicated in the OAG report, the quick roll-out and subsequent adjustments of the CERB helped Canadians to stay at home to avoid overwhelming the country’s health care system, while allowing them to meet their financial obligations. The report acknowledges that the decision the Government made to focus on "post-payment" rather than upfront verification helped to expedite benefit payments to Canadians when they needed them.
While there are no recommendations with respect to the design of the benefit, there are 2 recommendations with respect to controls in the report addressed to both the CRA and ESDC.
The first relates to finalizing and implementing the plans for post-payment verification for the CERB. The second calls for a formal assessment of the delivery of the CERB in order to apply the findings to the design and delivery of future government emergency response and recovery benefits.
ESDC and the CRA have responded to these recommendations in the report noting that they are in agreement.
Key quotes
“Since the very beginning of this pandemic, our government’s number one priority has been to keep Canadians safe. At a time when we were asking people to stay home and flatten the curve, the CERB helped more than 8 million workers and their families stay afloat. The quick and decisive actions we took to provide income support to millions of Canadians affected by closures and public health restrictions helped buffer the worst economic impacts.”
“The Auditor General’s report highlights the incredible work done by the Canadian public service, and recognizes the approach taken by our government to roll out support quickly during an unprecedented emergency.”
Prepared by
Name: Marina Makris
Title: Policy Analyst
No phone number
Key contact
Name: Steven Coté
Title: A/Executive Director
Phone number: 819-576-2722
Approved by
Name: Elisha Ram
Title: AADM, Skills and Employment Branch
Phone number: 819-654-5212
Date
Date approved in SADMO / COO: April 13, 2021
18. Parliamentary Background and Analysis
Official title: Appearance by the Deputy Minister Graham Flack Standing Committee on Public Accounts - Report 6, Canada Emergency Response Benefit of the Auditor General of Canada - April 15, 2021 | 11:00 a.m. - 13:00 p.m.
1. Background
On March 25, 2021, the Auditor General (AG) of Canada, Karen Hogan, tabled the first 3 audits on the Government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Report 6 - Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) will be the focus of the Public Accounts Committee (PACP) meeting of April 15, 2021.
The AG concluded that ESDC, the Department of Finance and the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) rose to the challenge presented by the pandemic by quickly analyzing, designing and delivering CERB to Canadians. The AG will later audit the results of the Government's post-payment verification efforts.
The meeting will provide Committee Members with the opportunity to query you, as Accounting Officer, on the conclusions and recommendations found in the audit. The Commissioner of the CRA, Bob Hamilton, and the Deputy Minister of Finance Canada, Michael Sabia, will also appear on April 15. The AG will also be present.
Of note, the AG and senior principals responsible for the CERB audit are scheduled to testify before PACP on April 13, where the AG will present the audit findings to the Committee, as well as Reports on the Canada Emergency Wage Benefit, the Pandemic Preparedness and Response and the Report on infrastructure: Investing in Canada Plan.
2. Committee proceedings
On April 15th, 2021, the AG will be provided with 5 minutes for an opening statement. The AG will typically share her remarks with witnesses in advance of the meeting.
You and your counterparts will each have 5 minutes for remarks. Furthermore, ESDC is required to provide a detailed action plan, in both official languages, to the Committee and the Office of the Auditor General of Canada 48 hours in advance of the meeting, which will also be posted on the Committee website. The Action Plan must address the audit recommendations by including specific actions, and timelines for completion.
PACP is 1 of 4 committees where the chair is a member of the official opposition. The Chair is Ms. Kelly Block, a member of the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC). The 2 Vice-Chairs are Liberal MP Lloyd Longfield and Bloc Québécois (BQ) MP Maxime Blanchette-Joncas. During a minority Parliament, the Government does not hold the majority at Committee.
Other members include:
- Luc Berthold (CPC)
- Kody Blois (Liberal)
- Greg Fergus (Liberal)
- Matthew Green New Democratic Party (NDP)
- Philip Lawrence (CPC)
- Francesco Sorbara (Liberal)
- Len Webber (CPC)
- Jean Yip (Liberal)
PACP has agreed that questioning of witnesses would be allocated as follows:
Round 1: 6 minutes for the first questioner of each party as follows:
- Conservative Party
- Liberal Party
- Bloc Québécois
- New Democratic Party
For the second and subsequent rounds, the order and time for questioning is as follows:
- Conservative Party, 5 minutes
- Liberal Party, 5 minutes
- Bloc Québécois, 2 and a half minutes
- New Democratic Party, 2 and a half minutes
- Conservative Party, 5 minutes
- Liberal Party, 5 minutes.
3. Parliamentary and media analysis
The 3 AG Audit Reports were tabled in the House of Commons on March 25 at 2:00 p.m. before Question Period. There were no questions on CERB. However, since the implementation of CERB, concerns related to fraud and abuse have been repeatedly raised in Committees and during Question Period. The timeline and cost of the post-payment verification will likely be raised during the April 15th Committee meeting.
Claims of Fraud and Post-payment verification
The AG held a press conference following the release of the Reports at which time she raised the importance of the upcoming post-payment verification. She noted that the verification would likely be both costly and lengthy – taking years to be completed. While the AG report was generally positive, the lack of pre-payment controls used to vet applicants' eligibility and prevent fraud was noted.
Of note, the CERB Report indicated that it could take CRA until March 2023 to conduct the necessary fraud verifications, and that ESDc has a separate 4-year plan for "post-payment integrity activities. The Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion was quoted in the National Post on March 25, 2021, where she acknowledged that some of the audits would be complex, some involving sophisticated fraud. It is anticipated that issues relating to verification measures will be raised at the April 15th, 2021, Committee meeting. In particular, Committee members may question the timelines.
Following the implementation of CERB, the CPC repeatedly raised concerns that the federal government had suspended compliance and enforcement of fraudulent claims and questioned the perceived lack of consequences to those abusing the system. Since the audit was released on March 25, Shadow Minister of Employment, Raquel Dancho spoke of the CPC's concern that the Government was not transparent with this information 12 months ago. As previously discussed at Committee and in Question Period, the NDP may also raise the issue of low-income Canadians being required to repay their COVID-19 emergency funds.
Aging IT Systems
Taking into consideration previous warnings from the Ag regarding the risks and consequences associated with the aging IT systems, PACP may query issues relating to IT systems; including, whether the system supporting EI was of concern in the delivery of CERB and other Benefits such as Canada Recovery Benefits (CRB). This question was raised at HUMA on February 18 when ESDC Officials took part in a Study on the Review of EI.
CERB Design and Delivery: Lessons learned
The Report on CERB also includes a recommendation that ESDc and the CRA conduct a formal assessment of the delivery of CERB in order to apply the findings to the design and delivery of future government emergency response and recovery benefits. As such, Committee Members might ask ESDC, the CRA and Finance about lessons learned and their ability to respond to future emergency situations without compromising program integrity.
International Monetary Fund (IMF) Report
On March 18, the IMF published a Report related to Canada's actions and fiscal measures taken since March 2020. According to the IMF, Canada's measures helped to limit devastating economic impacts and protect jobs while supporting Canadians and businesses through the pandemic. The Report observed that Canada's history of prudent policymaking helped to respond forcefully to the crisis while contain the socio-economic impact of the pandemic.
19. Committee membership and biographies
Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP)
Mandate of the committee
When the Speaker tables a report by the Auditor General in the House of Commons, it is automatically referred to the Public Accounts Committee. The Committee selects the chapters of the report it wants to study and calls the Auditor General and senior public servants from the audited organizations to appear before it to respond to the Office of the Auditor General's findings. The Committee also reviews the federal government's consolidated financial statements – the Public Accounts of Canada – and examines financial and/or accounting shortcomings raised by the Auditor General. At the conclusion of a study, the Committee may present a report to the House of Commons that includes recommendations to the government for improvements in administrative and financial practices and controls of federal departments and agencies.
Government policy, and the extent to which policy objectives are achieved, are generally not examined by the Public Accounts Committee. Instead, the Committee focuses on government administration – the economy and efficiency of program delivery as well as the adherence to government policies, directives and standards. The Committee seeks to hold the government to account for effective public administration and due regard for public funds.
Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3) of the House of Commons, the mandate of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts is to review and report on:
- the Public Accounts of Canada
- all reports of the Auditor General of Canada
- the Office of the Auditor General's Departmental Plan and Departmental Results Report, and
- any other matter that the House of Commons shall from time to time refer to the Committee
The Committee also reviews:
- the federal government's consolidated financial statements
- the Public Accounts of Canada
- makes recommendations to the government for improvements in spending practices; and
- the Estimates of the Office of the Auditor General
Other Responsibilities:
- the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of government administration
- the quality of administrative practices in the delivery of federal programs
- Government's accountability to Parliament with regard to federal
Committee Members
Chair
Kelly Block, Conservative, Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, PACP Member and Chair since Oct 2020
Vice-chair
Lloyd Longfield, Liberal, Guelph, PACP Member and Vice-Chair since Feb 2020
Maxime Blanchette-Joncas, Bloc Québécois, Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, PACP Member and Vice-Chair since Feb 2020, Public Accounts Critic
Members
Luc Berthold, Conservative, Mégantic—L'Érable, PACP Member since Oct 2020, TBS Critic
Philip Lawrence, Conservative, Northumberland—Peterborough South, PACP Member since October 2020, National Revenue Critic
Len Webber, Conservative, Calgary Confederation, PACP Member since Oct 2020
Matthew Green, New Democratic Party, Hamilton Centre, PACP Member since Feb 2020, TBS Critic
Kody Blois, Liberal, Kings—Hants, PACP Member since Feb 2020
Greg Fergus, Liberal, Hull—Alymer, PACP Member since May 2019, Parliamentary Secretary TBS and Digital Government
Francesco Sorbara, Liberal, Vaughan—Woodbridge, PACP Member since Feb 2020
Jean Yip, Liberal, Scarborough—Agincourt, PACP Member since Jan 2018
Kelly Block (Saskatchewan - Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek), Conservative, Chair

- Elected as the Member of Parliament in 2015 for Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, previously for Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar from 2008 to 2015
- Served as vice-chair on the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities in the 42nd Parliament
- Member of the Liaison Standing Committee
- Previous member of the Standing Committee of Government Operations and Estimates in the 43rd and 41st Parliament, the Standing Committee of Finance in the 40th Parliament
- Served as the Opposition critic for Public Services and Procurement Canada (appointed by Andrew Scheer)
- Prior to her election, Mrs. Block served 2 terms as the first female mayor of Waldheim, Saskatchewan, as chairperson of the Gabriel Springs Health District, and was awarded the Maclean's Parliamentarian of the Year – Rising Star – Award in June 2010
Lloyd Longfield (Ontario—Guelph), Liberal, First Vice-Chair

- Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Guelph in 2015
- Former member of the Public Accounts Committee (PACP) in the 43rd Parliament and is a standing Member of the Environment and Sustainable Development Committee (ENVI)
- Former Executive Director of the Guelph Chamber of Commerce, and former business executive
Maxime Blanchette-Joncas (Québec—Rimouski-Neigette – Témiscouata – Les Basques), Bloc Québécois, Second vice-chair

- Elected as the Member of Parliament for Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques in the 2019 federal election
- BQ Critic for Public Accounts
- Preceded in his riding by Guy Caron who served as the leader of the NDP from 2017 to 2019
- Business Administration graduate from the University of Quebec in Rimouski and former administrative officer at the Business Development Bank of Canada
- Was regional president of the Youth Forum of the Bloc Québécois
Luc Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), Conservative, Member

- Elected as the Member of Parliament for Mégantic—L'Érable in 2015
- Critic for Treasury Board
- Previously the Vice-Chair of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, and the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food
- Prior to his election, Mr. Berthold was Nathalie Normandeau's Political Assistant, and communications advisor for the Leader of the Official Opposition in 1999, the Interim Director of communications for Quebec's Liberal Party in 2006, and worked as a speaker, coach and gave leadership training sessions
Philip Lawrence (Northumberland—Peterborough South), Conservative, Member

- Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Northumberland—Peterborough South in the 2019 federal election
- Shadow Minister of National Revenue
- Former member of Standing Committee of Justice and Human Rights
- Prior to his election, Mr. Lawrence received his BA from Brock University in Political Science, he attended Osgoode Hall Law School and the Schulich School of business to obtain his law degree and MBA and volunteered at the Financial Planning Standards Council
Len Webber (Calgary Confederation), Conservative, Member

- Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Calgary Confederation in 2015
- Former Vice-Chair of the Standing Committee on Health in the 42nd Parliament
- Previously a member on the Standing Committee on Health, the Subcommittee on Sports-Related Concussions in Canada of the Standing Committee on Health and the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure of the Standing Committee on Health
- Prior to his election, Mr. Webber was a Member of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta, representing the constituency of Calgary-Foothills from 2004 to 2014, work as an apprentice electrician and managed his own contracting company for 10 years, and served as vice president and director of the Webber Academy, a private, non-profit school in southwest Calgary for children from junior kindergarten to grade 12 founded by his father.
Matthew Green (Ontario—Hamilton Centre), NDP, Member

- Elected as the Member of Parliament foe Hamilton Centre in the 2019 federal election in the riding formerly held by NDP MP David Christopherson
- NDP Critic for National Revenue/CRA, Public Services and Procurement
- Former Councillor for the City of Hamilton (2014 to 2018)
- Member of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP), the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates (OGGO), and the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates
- Member of the Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association (CAAF) and the Canadian Section of ParlAmericas (CPAM)
Kody Blois (Kings—Hants), Liberal, Member

- Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Kings—Hants in the 2019 federal election, in the riding formerly held by former TBS President Scott Brison
- Current member of the Standing Committee for Agriculture and Agri-Food, and the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food
- Former member of the Standing Committee for Agriculture and Agri-Food, and the Standing Committee on Public Accounts
- Blois completed degrees in commerce, law, and public administration - which sparked his interest in serving his community
Greg Fergus (Hull—Alymer), Liberal, Member, Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board and Minister of Digital Government

- Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Hull—Aylmer in 2015
- Member of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics
- Former member of the Standing Committee on Finance, and the Standing Committee on Public Accounts
- Current and Former Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board and Minister of Digital Government. Former Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development
- Former National Director of the Liberal Party of Canada and former political staffer in various Ministerial offices
Francesco Sorbara (Vaughn—Woodbridge), Liberal, Member

- Elected as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Vaughan—Woodbridge in 2015
- Member of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics
- Former member of the Standing Committee on Finance, as well as the Subcommittee on Agenda and Procedure of the Standing Committee on Finance, and the Standing Committee on Public Accounts
- Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Revenue
- Sorbara is a chartered financial analyst and worked in the global financial markets for nearly 20 years in both Canada and the United States for Scotiabank, JPMorgan Chase, and global credit rating agency DBRS
Jean Yip (Scarborough—Agincourt), Liberal, Member

- First elected in a by-election on December 11, 2017 as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Scarborough—Agincourt. Elected in 2019 as the Member of Parliament for the riding of Scarborough—Agincourt
- Current member of the Special Committee on Canada-China Relations
- Former member of the Public Accounts committee, and the Government Operations and Estimates Committee
20. April 13, 2021 PACP Summary - Briefing with Auditor General
Topic of Meeting
Briefing with the Auditor General concerning the reports tabled in the House on Thursday, March 25, 2021
Members in Attendance
LPC: Lloyd Longfield (Vice-Chair), Kody Blois, Greg Fergus, Francesco Sorbara, Jean Yip
CPC: Kelly Block (Chair), Luc Berthold, Phillip Lawrence, Len Webber
NDP: Matthew Green
BQ: Maxime Blanchette-Joncas (Vice-Chair) replaced by Julie Vignola
Witnesses
Office of the Auditor General
- Karen Hogan, Auditor General of Canada
- Nicholas Swales, Principal
- Carol McCalla, Principal
- Chantal Richard, Principal
- Philippe Le Goff, Principal
- Jo Ann Schwartz, Principal
Summary
The first hour of the meeting (11 am to noon) took place in camera, with a briefing with the Auditor General on motion concerning news articles.
The second hour with the Auditor General dealt with the 4 reports tabled on March 25:
- Report 6—Canada Emergency Response Benefit
- Report 7—Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy
- Report 8—Pandemic Preparedness, Surveillance, and Border Control Measures
- Report 9—Investing in Canada Plan
Members focused their questions on PHAC's handling of the pandemic and the findings in the AG's report on Investing in Canada Plan as these reports elicited the most criticism. There were no questions on the CERB.
Opening Remarks
The Auditor General outlined the findings in Reports 6, 7, 8 and 9 and was critical of the Investing in Canada Plan (Report 9) and pandemic preparedness, surveillance, and border control measures (Report 8). While the OAG found that the government was not as ready as it could have been for a pandemic of this magnitude, the public service mobilized, prioritized the needs of Canadians and quickly delivered support and services. She noted that Finance, ESDC and CRA rose to the challenge and quickly analyzed, designed and delivered the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) (Report 6). However, with the decision to rely on personal attestations, post-payment verification becomes very important. The AG is aware that ESDC and CRA are working to start their post-payment verification efforts relating to the CERB later this year. She remarked that work in this area, will be the subject of a future audit.
The AG also commented on the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) (Report 7), of which she observed a similar focus on getting help out quickly, in this case to businesses, and that Finance and CRA worked together within short timeframes to support the development and implementation of the program. However, she noted that the design and rollout of the subsidy have highlighted pre-existing weaknesses in CRA's systems, approaches and data. She is also expecting a follow up audit on the CEWS.
She ended her opening remarks by noting that the pandemic has highlighted the importance of dealing with known issues, whether it's agreeing on which organization has the lead, who will do what when, who will report what to whom, or replacing outdated systems or processes and addressing issues in data quality and that Government organizations need to do collaboration better.
Overview of Q and A
CPC – Len Webber asked about the Investment in Canada Plan's absence of clear and complete reporting, any privacy breaches found in audits during the pandemic.
LPC – Lloyd Longfield inquired about awareness and reporting of infrastructure projects by various orders of governments, whether the AG works with her provincial and municipal counterparts; and vaccine rollout in Canada.
BQ – Julie Vignola raised questions regarding the country's pandemic preparedness following the SARS outbreak in 2002; delay due to bureaucracy or PHAc scientists let go by previous Governments; and challenge for the OAG to take on a comprehensive audit on Investment in Canada Plan.
NDP – Matthew Green asked about PHAC's inadequate pandemic preparedness after SARS and H5N1 outbreaks in the past and National Emergency Strategic Stockpile.
CPC – Len Webber sought the AG's clarification and comments on the CEWS and not requesting the SIN in the application forms, and whether CRA applied controls in pre-payment. He commented that his constituents benefited from the CERB but may have to return some of that money.
LPC – Jean Yip sought explanations and comments on PHAC's lack of progress in pandemic preparedness in the past 2 decades; size of bureaucracy in causing delays; collaboration between PHAC and CBSA on quarantine measures; and specific report that stood out (A: focus on service instead of process was the most outstanding, as seen with CERB and CEWS).
BQ – Julie Vignola asked the AG whether she is satisfied with the resources provided to the OAG for their multitude pandemic audit work, and whether departments' and agencies' collaborated with the OAG in their audits.
NDP – Matthew Green asked for the AG's comments on PHAC's failure in their risk assessment and preparedness for the pandemic.