Chapter 2: Impact and effectiveness of Employment Insurance benefits (Part I of the Employment Insurance Act)

Official title: Employment Insurance Monitoring and Assessment Report for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2023, and ending March 31, 2024: Chapter 2 – Impacts and effectiveness of the Employment Insurance benefits (Part I of the Employment Insurance Act)

In chapter 2

List of abbreviations

This is the complete list of abbreviations for the Employment Insurance Monitoring and Assessment Report for the fiscal year beginning April 1, 2023 and ending March 31, 2024.

B/C
Benefits-to-Contributions
B/U
Beneficiary-to-Unemployed (rate)
B/UC
Beneficiary-to-Unemployed Contributor (rate)
CAWS
Client Access Work Station
CCB
Compassionate Care Benefits
CCDA
Canadian Council of Directors of Apprenticeship
CCIS
Corporate Client Information Service
CEEDD
Canadian Employer-Employee Dynamics Database
CEGEP
College of General and Professional Teaching
CEIC
Canada Employment Insurance Commission
CEIFB
Canada Employment Insurance Financing Board
CERB
Canada Emergency Response Benefit
CF
Canadian Forces
CFP
Call for Proposals
CPI
Consumer Price Index
CPP
Canada Pension Plan
CRA
Canada Revenue Agency
CRF
Consolidated Revenue Fund
EAS
Employment Assistance Services
EBSM
Employment Benefits and Support Measures
EDI
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
EI
Employment Insurance
EI-ERB
Employment Insurance Emergency Response Benefit
EIACC
Employment Insurance Appeals Consultative Committee
EICS
Employment Insurance Coverage Survey
eROE
Electronic Record of Employment
ESDC
Employment and Social Development Canada
FS
Family Supplement
G7
Group of Seven
GC
Government of Canada
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
HR
Human Resources
IC
Individual Counselling
ID
Identification
IMP
International Mobility Program
ISET
Indigenous Skills and Employment Training
JCP
Job Creation Partnership
LFS
Labour Force Survey
LMDA
Labour Market Development Agreements
LMI
Labour Market Information
LMP
Labour Market Partnerships
LTU
Long-Term Unemployed
MSCA
My Service Canada Account
MIE
Maximum Insurable Earnings
NERE
New Entrant and Re-Entrant
NESI
National Essential Skills Initiative
NHQ
National Headquarters
NOC
National Occupation Classification
OAS
Old Age Security
OASIS
Occupational and Skills Information System
p.p.
Percentage point
PCIC
Parents of Critically Ill Children
PCS
Post Call Survey
PPE
Premium Paid Eligible
PRP
Premium Reduction Program
PTs
Provinces and Territories
QPIP
Quebec Parental Insurance Plan
RAIS
Registered Apprenticeship Information System
R&I
Research and Innovation
ROE
Record of Employment
SAT
Secure Automated Transfer
SCT
Skills and Competency Taxonomy
SD
Skills Development
SD-A
Skills Development – Apprentices
SD-R
Skills Development – Regular
SE
Self-Employment
SEAQ
Service, Excellence, Accuracy and Quality
SEPH
Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours
SFS
Skills for Success
SIN
Social Insurance Number
SIP
Sectoral Initiatives Program
SME
Small and medium-sized enterprise
SST
Social Security Tribunal
STVC
Status Vector
SUB
Supplemental Unemployment Benefit
SWSP
Sectoral Workforce Solutions Program
TES
Targeted Earning Supplements
TR
Temporary Resident
TRF
Targeting, Referral and Feedback
TFWP
Temporary Foreign Worker Program
TWS
Targeted Wage Subsidies
UV
Unemployment-to-job-vacancy
VBW
Variable Best Weeks
VER
Variable Entrance Requirement
WISE
Work Integration Social Enterprises
WWC
Working While on Claim

List of figures

List of tables

2.1 Employment Insurance benefits

In this section

This chapter of the Employment Insurance Monitoring and Assessment Report assesses income support provided by Employment Insurance (EI) Part I benefits: regular benefits, fishing benefits, Work-Sharing benefits and special benefits. It covers the period beginning April 1, 2023, and ending March 31, 2024 (2023‑24).

This chapter includes several key indicators, such as the number of new claims established, total amount of benefits paid, level of benefits, maximum entitlement and actual duration of benefits, as well as the exhaustion of benefits. Throughout the chapter, key EI program provisions and recent changes made to the EI program are discussed. Indicators related to level of claims and level of benefits are presented for claims established within the fiscal year for which at least 1 dollar in EI benefits was paid. Indicators such as maximum entitlement and actual duration of benefits are based on claims completed during the fiscal year for which at least 1 dollar in EI benefits was paid. Indicators related to the amount of EI benefits paid are presented on a cash basis, which means the expenses are accounted for during the fiscal year in which they are paid. More information on the definitions of the indicators presented throughout this chapter can be found in Annex 2.1 of this report.

This chapter relies on several sources of information to provide a comprehensive analysis of the EI program. EI administrative data, generally based on a 10% sample for fiscal years 2022‑23 and before and 100% of data for 2023‑24, underpins most of the analysis (consult the methodological note below). Some sections of this chapter also make use of tax data provided by the Canada Revenue Agency related to T4 tax slips with employment income or T1 returns. Statistics Canada's Employment Insurance Coverage Survey provides the basis for analysis of coverage, eligibility and access to EI benefits for unemployed people. Throughout the chapter, results by sociodemographic characteristics are discussed and compared to previous years.

Annex 2 of the report presents additional statistical information on benefits analyzed in this chapter. Annex 5 breaks down financial information from the EI Operating Account. Annex 7 provides an overview of major legislative and regulatory changes to the EI program between April 1996 and December 2024.

Methodological note: Change in data methodology and data revision

In previous EI monitoring and assessment reports, results on regular benefits and some special benefits (maternity, parental and sickness benefits) were based on a 10% sample of EI administrative data.* Starting in 2023‑24, results for these benefit types are now based on 100% of EI administrative data. Overall, there is an estimated difference of less than 1% in terms of number of claims established and amount of EI benefits paid when comparing results based on the 10% sample of data and 100% of data. However, the differences are slightly higher when results are broken down by some age groups and industries. This change in data methodology allows producing more accurate results.

In addition, the EI administrative data used in this report underwent a revision to ensure each claim is only counted once, even though some might be processed in different operating systems. Duplicates in the data were identified and subsequently removed during the revision. Overall, there was an average overestimation of 2% in the number of EI claims established and 1% in the amount of EI benefits paid every year, although this was slightly lower in 2022‑23. However, some benefit types were more impacted than others. Claims for compassionate care benefits, family caregiver benefits for adults and family caregiver benefits for children were overestimated by 5%, 10% and 37% respectively in 2022‑23.** This can be mainly explained by the fact that claims for these benefit types are more likely to be manually processed at some point and thus be in different operating systems.

Past fiscal years results related to the number of EI claims established and amount of EI benefits paid were not revised despite this change in data methodology and data revision. Consequently, comparisons with previous fiscal years need to be made with caution. For these reasons, as well as the EI temporary measures that were in place until September 2022, no year-over-year comparisons are examined in the chapter. Results in future EI monitoring and assessment reports will not be impacted by these methodological changes and comparisons with the fiscal years ahead will be possible.

  • * Other EI benefit types such as fishing, Work-Sharing and caregiving benefits were based on 100% of EI administrative data.
  • ** Similar results were found in terms of amount of EI benefits paid for these 3 benefit types.

2.1.1 Employment Insurance benefits overview

The EI program provides temporary income support to partially replace employment income for eligible claimants to help them find a new job and stay active in the labour force, and for those who are absent from work due to specific life circumstances (such as illness, injury, pregnancy, providing care to a newborn or newly adopted child, providing care or support to a critically ill or injured person or someone needing end-of-life care).

In this chapter, EI benefits refer to regular benefits, special benefits, fishing benefits and Work-Sharing benefits (consult Table 1). Special benefits include maternity benefits, parental benefits, sickness benefits, family caregiver benefits for adults or children, and compassionate care benefits. Subsection 2.1.1 covers the number of new claims established in the fiscal year, total amount paid over the fiscal year, and benefit levels of claims established. Subsection 2.1.2 examines combined (or mixed) benefit claims. Subsection 2.1.3 provides an analysis of the usage of EI benefits relative to EI premiums contributed.

Table 1 – Summary of Employment Insurance benefit types
Benefit type Circumstance Insurable employment entrance requirement Maximum entitlement
Regular Unemployed with a valid reason for separation and available for work and searching for suitable employment or retraining in certain cases 420 to 700 hours depending on the regional unemployment rate 14 to 45 weeks, depending on the number of hours of insurable employment and regional unemployment rate
Fishing Self-employed fishers actively searching work and unable to qualify for regular benefits $2,500 and $4,200 in insurable earnings from fishing depending on the regional unemployment rate 26 weeks per season (summer or winter)
Work-Sharing Firm avoiding layoffs during a slowdown in business activity for reasons beyond the firm's control with a recovery plan and a Work‑Sharing agreement in place 420 to 700 hours depending on the regional unemployment rate and must be a year-round employee 6 to 26 weeks with the possibility of an extension by 12 weeks if warranted
Special1 – Maternity Unavailable to work because of pregnancy or having recently given birth 600 hours 15 weeks
Special1 – Parental Unavailable to work to care for a newborn or a newly adopted child 600 hours Standard parental: 40 weeks available to share, with no parent able to receive more than 35 weeks;
Extended parental (at a lower replacement rate): 69 weeks available to share, with no parent able to receive more than 61 weeks
Special1 – Sickness Unavailable to work because of illness, injury or quarantine 600 hours 26 weeks
Special1 – Family caregiver for children Unavailable to work because providing care or support to a critically ill or injured child under the age of 18 600 hours 35 weeks2
Special1 – Family caregiver for adults Unavailable to work because providing care or support to a critically ill or injured person 18 years or older 600 hours 15 weeks2
Special1 – Compassionate care Unavailable to work because providing care to a person of any age who requires end-of-life care 600 hours 26 weeks2
  • 1 Self-employed workers (other than fishers) who have opted into EI special benefits must meet an insurable earnings threshold for the calendar year preceding the claim. The threshold was $8,255 for claims established in 2023 and $8,492 for claims established in 2024. Self-employed fishers must meet an insurable earnings threshold from self‑employment fishing of $3,760 during the qualifying period to qualify for special benefits.
  • 2 Benefits can be shared between eligible claimants (that is, family members or those considered to be like family).

2 different sets of EI temporary measures were introduced over the past few years as the Canadian economy and job market recovered from the disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Under these temporary measures, the entrance requirements to qualify for EI benefits varied over the past fiscal years, depending on when claims were established. For example, claims established in the first half of 2022‑23 required a minimum of 420 hours of insurable employment during the qualifying period to qualify for EI regular benefits, regardless of the regional unemployment rate. These temporary measures ended on September 24, 2022 and new claims established after that date were under the original EI rules.

Given the different sets of EI temporary measures in place from 2020-21 to 2022‑23, year-over-year comparisons of the number of EI claims established and amount of EI benefits paid are not examined in the chapter.

Impacts of measures of using the last reason for separation on access to Employment Insurance benefits: Studies examining the impacts of the Employment Insurance temporary measures during the COVID‑19 pandemic

To support Canadian workers through the economic and labour market disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Government of Canada implemented two sets of Employment Insurance (EI) temporary measures.

The first set of EI temporary measures were introduced to facilitate access to EI benefits for all new claims established between September 27, 2020 and September 25, 2021. They included, among others a minimum of 120 hours of insurable employment to be eligible for EI regular and special benefits (after the 300-hour credit for regular benefits and 480-hour credit for special benefits were applied), a maximum of 50 weeks of regular benefits, and a minimum benefit rate of $500 per week (or $300 per week for extended parental benefits).

The second set of EI temporary measures were in place for claims established between September 26, 2021 and September 24, 2022. They included among others, a minimum of 420 hours of insurable employment to be eligible for EI regular and special benefits, a simplified treatment of reasons for separation and a simplified treatment of monies on separation. In addition, a minimum benefit rate of $300 per week (or $180 per week for extended parental benefits) was provided for claims established between September 26, 2021 and November 20, 2021.

A first departmental study* and its follow-up study** examined the impacts on the eligibility and on the additional income support provided by the 2 sets of EI temporary measures compared to what would have been provided under the original EI rules. These results are summarized in the 2022-2023 EI Monitoring and Assessment Report. The follow-up study also estimated that the additional cost for the main EI temporary measures examined was $20.6 billion. The main measures from the first set of EI temporary measures had an estimated additional cost of $19.3 billion, whereas the main measures from the second set of EI temporary measures had an estimated additional cost of $1.3 billion.

A more recent departmental study*** examined in greater detail how the minimum of 420 hours of insurable employment and the simplified treatment of reasons for separation from the second set of temporary measures improved access to EI benefits for workers in precarious employment. Among claims established between September 26, 2021 and September 24, 2022, the study found that 10.5% of regular claims and 7.0% of special benefit claims would not have qualified for EI benefits without the minimum of 420 hours of insurable employment and the simplified treatment of reasons for separation. Among these claims:

  • the minimum of 420 hours of insurable employment had the biggest impact since 6.5% of regular claims and 4.1% of special benefit claims would not have been established without it. The average weekly benefit rate was $323 for regular claims
  • the simplified treatment of reasons for separation was needed to establish 3.6% of regular claims and 2.5% of special benefit claims, with an average weekly benefit rate of $475 for regular claims
  • another 0.4% of regular claims and 0.4% of special benefit claims were established using both measures, with an average weekly benefit rate of $277 for regular claims
  • the average weekly benefit rate was $352 for special benefit claims that would not have been established without the temporary measures

Furthermore, an additional 7.1% of regular claims and 5.5% of special benefit claims did not need the temporary measures to be established, but benefited from the measures by having a higher entitlement (from an average of 23.0 weeks under original EI rules to 30.7 weeks with the temporary measures for regular claims). These claims also benefited from the measures by having a higher weekly benefit rate. For regular claims, there was an increase of $29 from the average weekly benefit rate of $501 under original EI rules and for the special benefit claims, an increase of $34 from the average weekly benefit rate of $472 under original EI rules.

  • * ESDC, Initial impacts of temporary Employment Insurance measures in Canadian communities during the pandemic (Ottawa: ESDC, Employment Insurance Policy Directorate, 2022).
  • ** ESDC, Impacts of Employment Insurance temporary measures during the pandemic: update and new findings (Ottawa: ESDC, Employment Insurance Policy Directorate, 2024).
  • *** ESDC, Impacts of measures of using the last reason for separation on access to Employment Insurance benefits (Ottawa: ESDC, Employment Insurance Policy Directorate, 2025).

Employment Insurance claims and amount paid

The total number of new EI claims established was 2.0 million in 2023‑24. This is slightly higher than the levels recorded in 2022‑23 (1.9 million) and before the COVID‑19 pandemic (1.8 million in 2018‑19 and 1.9 million in 2019‑20). This may be partly due to the significant labour force growth and rising unemployment rate at the national level during the reporting period. In comparison, the number of EI claims established in 2023‑24 was lower than the ones observed during the pandemic period (3.0 million in 2020‑21 and 2.1 million in 2021‑22). The total EI benefit payments increased to reach $21.0 billion in the reporting period compared to $19.7 billion in the previous fiscal year (consult Table 2).

Table 2 – Employment Insurance claims and amount paid by type of benefits, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Types of Employment Insurance benefit New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ million) 2023‑24
Regular 1,288,240 1,374,813 $12,310.0 $12,812.1
Fishing 30,447 27,437 $372.5 $354.9
Work-Sharing 9,959 17,529 $30.6 $39.5
Special 657,820 675,757 $7,017.5 $7,778.3
Maternity 170,530 173,191 $1,356.3 $1,413.0
Parental 236,140 244,005 $3,499.6 $3,488.7
Sickness 418,480 429,798 $2,003.4 $2,725.3
Family caregiver for children* 5,855 4,422 $41.2 $33.6
Family caregiver for adults* 13,272 14,135 $74.7 $77.8
Compassionate care* 6,619 6,417 $42.4 $39.9
All benefit types 1,900,720 2,003,560 $19,719.2 $20,972.7
  • Notes: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes all claims for which at least $1 of Employment Insurance benefits was paid. The sum of claims by benefit type does not add up as multiple benefit types can be combined in one single claim.
  • * Due to revisions in EI administrative data, comparisons between 2023-24 and previous fiscal years need to be made with caution. Consult the methodology box in Section 2.1.
  • Consult Annex 2.3 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

According to Statistics Canada,Footnote 1 there were 754,100 beneficiaries receiving EI benefits on average each month during 2023‑24. This is similar to the previous year, as well as pre-pandemic levels.

New Employment Insurance claims established

The higher number of new EI claims observed during the reporting period relative to 2022‑23 is largely attributed to an increase in claims for EI regular benefits (consult Table 2). The share of regular claims among all new claims established was 68.6% in 2023‑24, whereas the share of claims for sickness benefits ─ which are the second most common benefit type claimed ─ was 21.5% over the same period.

All provinces and territories, except for Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia and New-Brunswick experienced increases in the number of new EI claims established in 2023‑24 compared to 2022‑23 (consult Table 3). The number of new claims also increased for both genders, with men continuing to account for just over half (54.3%) of all new claims in 2023‑24. All age groups also registered increases in their number of new EI claims established during the reporting period relative to the previous fiscal year.

Table 3 – Employment Insurance claims and amount paid by province or territory, gender and age, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ millions) 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 82,880 79,013 $1,141.1 $1,089.0
Prince Edward Island 22,730 22,757 $279.7 $272.9
Nova Scotia 78,430 77,989 $933.0 $904.1
New Brunswick 83,600 81,299 $1,054.6 $981.6
Quebec 476,480 498,005 $3,653.0 $3,926.4
Ontario 610,670 663,134 $6,554.1 $7,233.1
Manitoba 67,350 70,247 $725.5 $739.5
Saskatchewan 53,270 54,582 $654.9 $650.4
Alberta 196,200 215,429 $2,334.7 $2,491.4
British Columbia 223,610 234,916 $2,308.5 $2,601.7
Yukon 2,280 2,398 $28.7 $30.7
Northwest Territories 1,860 2,418 $28.9 $29.5
Nunavut 1,360 1,373 $22.5 $22.5
Male 1,006,590 1,087,830 $9,581.6 $10,483.4
Female 894,130 915,730 $10,137.6 $10,489.3
24 years old and under 174,870 182,520 $1,521.9 $1,488.7
25 to 44 years old 956,370 1,027,472 $10,929.3 $11,829.6
45 to 54 years old 327,820 339,581 $2,969.3 $3,164.0
55 years old and over 441,660 453,987 $4,298.6 $4,490.4
Canada 1,900,720 2,003,560 $19,719.2 $20,972.7
  • Notes: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.3 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

Total amount paid in Employment Insurance benefits

In 2023‑24, the total amount paid for all types of EI benefits combined reached $21.0 billion compared to $19.7 billion in the previous fiscal year. This increase was mainly attributable to the rise in the amount paid in EI regular and sickness benefits over the same period (consult Table 2).

The share of EI regular benefits paid was 61.1% in 2023‑24, while the share of EI special benefits paid slightly increased to 37.1%, mainly due to the higher share of sickness benefits paid in 2023‑24 (13.0%) compared to 2022‑23 (10.2%) (consult Chart 1). The shares of amount paid for the other benefit types in 2023‑24 remained fairly stable compared to 2022‑23. The breakdown of the amount paid by benefit type in 2023‑24 was relatively similar to the shares of claims established by benefit type during the same period.

Chart 1 – Amount paid in Employment Insurance benefits*, by benefit type, Canada, 2023‑24
Chart 1: description follows
Text description for Chart 1
Benefit type Amount paid ($ millions) Share in percentage (%)
Regular benefits $12,812.1 61.1%
Work-Sharing benefits $39.5 0.2%
Fishing benefits $354.9 1.7%
Special benefits $7,778.3 37.1%
Parental benefits $3,488.7 16.6%
Sickness benefits $2,725.3 13.0%
Maternity benefits $1,413.0 6.7%
Compassionate care and family caregiving benefits $151.3 0.7%
Amount paid in Employment Insurance benefits $20,984.9 100.0%
  • * The total amount paid reported in Chart 1 does not correspond to the total reported in Tables 2 and 3 because of some incompatibility of administrative data sources for family caregiver benefits.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

During the reporting period, the Atlantic provinces and Saskatchewan recorded declines in EI benefits paid, while the remaining provinces and territories saw an increase in EI benefits paid. Claimants in Ontario and Quebec continued to receive higher shares of the total amount paid in EI benefits in 2023‑24 (34.5% and 18.7%, respectively), followed by those from British Columbia and Alberta.

In 2023‑24, EI benefits paid to both genders and to each age group, except for those under the age of 25, increased from the previous fiscal year. Women accounted for 50.0% of the EI benefits paid, slightly lower than in 2022‑23 (51.4%), but similar to pre-pandemic levels. The distribution of EI benefits paid across age groups remained relatively similar to 2022‑23.

Levels of benefits

The weekly benefit rate to which EI claimants are entitled is subject to the Variable Best Weeks (VBW) provision.Footnote 2 Under this provision, the weekly benefit rate is calculated based on an EI claimant's highest (best) weeks of insurable earnings during their qualifying period. The number of highest (best) weeks used under this provision ranges from 14 to 22, depending on the unemployment rate in the claimant's EI economic region at the time the claim is established (consult Table 4).

Table 4 – Number of best weeks of insurable earnings by regional unemployment rate as per the Variable Best Weeks (VBW) provision
Regional unemployment rate Number of weeks
6.0% and under 22
6.1% to 7.0% 21
7.1% to 8.0% 20
8.1% to 9.0% 19
9.1% to 10.0% 18
10.1% to 11.0% 17
11.1% to 12.0% 16
12.1% to 13.0% 15
More than 13.0% 14

Note: The monthly regional unemployment rates used for the EI program are a 3‑month moving average of seasonally adjusted rates of unemployment produced by Statistics Canada, except for EI regions in the territories which use the higher of the 3‑month or 12‑month moving average, as per section 17 of the Employment Insurance Regulations.

Under the EI program, the weekly benefit rate is paid as 55%Footnote 3 of the average weekly insurable earnings, up to the maximum weekly benefit rate in a given year. The maximum weekly benefit rate was $650 in 2023 and $668 in 2024 (except for extended parental benefits).Footnote 4 Claimants with children (under the age of 18 years) and low annual family income may also be eligible for the Family Supplement provision.Footnote 5

For all claims established in 2023‑24, excluding those for extended parental benefits, the average weekly benefit rate increased by 4.7% nationally to $560. This rise was higher than the 2.8% growth in maximum insurable earnings from 2023 to 2024. All provinces and territories recorded increases. Yukon had the highest average weekly benefit rate ($615), while Nova Scotia and Manitoba had the lowest average weekly benefit rates ($529). On average, men were entitled to a higher weekly benefit rate than women ($587 and $526, respectively). Claimants between 25 to 44 years old had the highest average weekly benefit rate ($576) among the age groups (consult Annex 2.3.2).

Just under half of all claimants (48.6%) who established a claim in 2023‑24 were entitled to the maximum weekly benefit rate. This proportion was the highest in Nunavut (73.7%) and the lowest in New-Brunswick (36.5%). Men were proportionally more likely to receive the maximum weekly benefit rate (59.9%) compared to women (35.0%). A higher proportion of claimants between 25 to 44 years old received the maximum weekly benefit rate (54.6%) than any other age group.

Family Supplement provision

The EI Family Supplement provision provides additional benefits to EI claimants with children under the age of 18 who have an annual family net income equal to or less than $25,921, supporting low-income families. The claimant must also receive the Canada Child Benefit.Footnote 6 Under the Family Supplement provision, which is available to claims of all EI benefit types, the weekly amount of family supplement can increase a claimant's benefit rate from 55% to a maximum of 80% of their weekly insurable earnings, up to the maximum weekly benefit rate. The supplement provided to eligible claimants is determined by the claimant's family net income, the number of children in the claimant's family, and the age of the claimant's children.Footnote 7

In 2023‑24, low-income families received a total of $48.6 million in additional EI benefits through the Family Supplement provision. Close to 51,400 claims received the family supplement in 2023‑24, which represents 2.6% of all claims established during the reporting period. The proportion of EI claims receiving the family supplement has decreased for the past 2 decades, from a high of 10.7% of all claims in 2000‑01. This decrease can be explained by the fact that the eligibility threshold for this provision has not been indexed over time, as well as by changes in family composition and wage growth.

Women (81.4%) and claimants aged 25 to 44 (74.1%) continued to be the main demographic groups benefitting from the Family Supplement provision. The average family supplement to the weekly benefit rate was $46 in 2023‑24 and has remained relatively unchanged over the years (consult Annex 2.23).

A departmental studyFootnote 8 examined claims that would have been eligible to additional benefits under the EI Family Supplement provision if the annual family net income thresholds were adjusted for inflation. The study found that the share of EI claims eligible for the family supplement would be 2.9 percentage points higher if the annual family net income thresholds were adjusted for inflation for claims that started in 2022, whereas the family supplement to the weekly benefit rate would be, on average, $3 higher. If both the family net income thresholds and the family supplement amounts were adjusted for inflation, the family supplement to the weekly benefit rate would be, on average, $25 higher.

Supplemental Unemployment Benefit plans

While EI benefits provide temporary income support for claimants, employers can use a Supplemental Unemployment Benefit (SUB) plan to increase their employees' weekly earnings when they are unemployed due to a temporary stoppage of work, training, illness, injury or quarantine.Footnote 9 These SUB plans need to be registered with Service Canada so that supplemental payments (or top-ups) are not considered as earnings and are not deducted from EI benefits. The combined weekly payments from the plan and EI weekly benefits cannot exceed 95% of the employee's normal weekly earnings.

Employers can also provide supplemental payments to maternity, parental (including adoption), compassionate care and family caregiver benefits.Footnote 10 These plans do not have to be registered with Service Canada. The top-up amounts are not deducted from EI benefits if the combined weekly payments do not exceed 100% of the employee's normal weekly earnings and the plan does not use the supplemental payments to reduce other accumulated employment benefits (such as banked sick leave, vacation leave credits or severance pay).

Results on average weekly benefit rates presented in this chapter do not include any supplemental payments made to EI claimants by their employers.

Study on Supplemental Unemployment Benefit plans

A departmental study* examined the characteristics of employers and employees with SUB plans**, and their utilization pattern of the EI program. From 2008 to 2017, an annual average of over 6,800 firms (0.5% of all firms in Canada) had active SUB plans, increasing over time. Around 63% of these plans were for illness, injury or quarantine, while plans for temporary stoppage of work or training and plans consisting of a combination of top-up plans accounted for around 10%, 7% and 20% respectively.

Firms offering SUB plans were generally larger in size compared to the general firms' profile in Canada. Firms having over 50 employees accounted for 5% of all firms in Canada during the 2008‑2017 period, while they represented 40% of firms with SUB plans over the same period. In terms of the distribution of firms offering SUB plans across industries, about 52% were in the Services industry (excluding the governmental sector) and close to 14% in the Construction industry.

Overall, EI claims that receive top-up payments through SUB plans constituted between 40,000 and 60,000 claims per year during the study period (around 3% of all EI claims). Most of these claims (49%) were for EI regular benefits (temporary stoppage of work), followed by 27% for EI sickness benefits (illness, injury or quarantine), and 2% for training.

  • * ESDC, Supplemental Unemployment Benefit plans (Ottawa: ESDC, Evaluation Directorate, 2021).
  • ** Excluding SUB plans for maternity, parental (including adoption), compassionate care, and family caregiver benefits.

2.1.2 Combined Employment Insurance claims

Under certain provisions of the EI program, a claimant may receive multiple types of benefits as part of a single claim if they meet the requirements for each benefit type they intend to receive.Footnote 11,Footnote 12

A "pure" claim is one in which an EI claimant receives a single benefit type, while a "combined" claim is one in which the claimant receives more than one benefit type. The combination of EI benefit types in a single claim is examined using claims completed in 2023‑24, regardless of the year in which the claim was established. Statistics for the reporting fiscal year are preliminary estimates and are subject to revision in the future. Combined claims represented 17.0% of all completed claims in 2023‑24 (consult Table 5).

Table 5 – Completed pure and combined Employment Insurance claims by types of benefits, Canada, 2023‑24
Benefit type Level of total claims ('000s)P Level of pure claims ('000s)P Share of pure claims (%)P Level of combined claims ('000s)P Share of combined claims (%)P Benefit type most often combined with (share of combined claims)P
Regular 1,399.2 1,241.1 88.7% 158.2 11.3% Sickness (88.6%)
Fishing 27.8 23.9 86.1% 3.9 13.9% Sickness (90.3%)
Work-Sharing 12.8 8.6 67.1% 4.2 32.9% Regular (80.4%)
Maternity 172.0 2.7 1.6% 169.4 98.4% Parental (98.5%)
Parental* 245.3 70.4 28.7% 174.9 71.3% Maternity (95.4%)
Sickness 423.9 251.8 59.4% 172.1 40.6% Regular (81.4%)
Compassionate care 6.6 4.2 64.8% 2.3 35.2% Sickness (62.3%)
Family caregiver for children 3.2 2.4 76.4% 0.7 23.6% Regular (57.3%)
Family caregiver for adults 13.3 9.5 71.0% 3.9 29.0% Regular (62.1%)
All claims** 1,944.3 1,614.6 83.0% 329.8 17.0% n/a
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Percentage shares are based on unrounded numbers. Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI benefits was paid. The sum of claims by benefit type for the "Level of total claims" and "Level of combined claims" columns does not add up to the total because more than one benefit type can be part of the same claim. This does not apply to pure claims that include only one benefit type.
  • *Parental benefits include benefits for biological parents and adoptive parents.
  • ** The total number of claims is based on claims completed during the fiscal year. This explains why the total number of claims here is different from the total numbers of claims in Tables 2 and 3 which are based on established claims.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • Consult Annex 2.27 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Over time, trends in the share of claims that combined more than one benefit type remained relatively stable. The share of combined claims was 17.5% in 2022‑23 (consult Annex 2.27). Women were more likely to claim more than one type of EI benefit (26.6%) than men (8.9%), mostly due to their high probability of claiming both maternity and parental benefits.

In fact, maternity benefits were the benefits most often combined with other types of benefits, usually parental benefits (98.5%). However, a significant proportion also claimed sickness benefits with maternity benefits (14.7%), which can be claimed 12 weeks prior to the child's expected date of birth. The combination of sickness, maternity and parental benefits was the most common among claims with 3 or more benefit types (23,700 claims, which represented 13.8% of completed claims for maternity benefits in 2023‑24).

Claims for parental benefits were combined at a lower rate than maternity, as only 9.5% of men who claimed parental also received another benefit payment. Of those male claimants, 86.6% received regular benefits and 15.6% claimed sickness benefits. Among women, virtually all (99.4%) who combined parental benefits with other types of benefits combined them with maternity benefits.

Sickness benefits were the third most likely to be combined with other benefit types (40.6%), mostly with regular benefits (81.4%). Men combined their sickness benefits predominantly with regular benefits (94.6%), while sickness claims from women were most often combined with regular (68.8%), maternity (28.4%) and parental benefits (27.2%). Sickness also represented the greatest share of combined regular claims (88.6%).

When combined, compassionate care benefits were shared with sickness benefits (62.3%) or regular benefits (46.0%). Men tended to combine compassionate care benefits with regular benefits (59.6%) more often than women (40.4%). Women were more likely to combine compassionate care benefits with sickness benefits (67.8%) compared to men (49.2%).

Similar to compassionate care benefits, both family caregiver benefits for children and for adults were most often combined with regular benefits by men (70.6% and 73.0%, respectively). Women were more likely to combine family caregiver benefits for children with sickness benefits (55.3%), and family caregiver benefits for adults with regular benefits (56.5%).

One third of all Work-Sharing claims were combined with other benefit types (32.9%), predominantly regular benefits (80.4%). This is attributable to the fact that both benefit types are typically used during a downturn in business activity, which increases the risk of layoffs (Work-Sharing benefits) and actual layoffs (regular benefits). Regular benefits are usually claimed following Work-Sharing benefits, reflecting a continued downturn in a participating firm's activity that eventually leads to a downsizing of the firm's labour force (consult Section 2.5 for more details).

While it is possible for fishers to combine fishing benefits with other benefit types (under some restrictions), 13.9% of fishing claims were combined claims. Of those claims, 90.3% were combined with sickness benefits.

2.1.3 Benefits-to-contributions ratios

The EI benefits paid to eligible claimants who qualify are financed solely by the mandatory contributions (EI premiums) made by employers, employees and the self-employed persons who have opted into the EI program. The amount of EI benefits paid relative to the contributions made provides some useful insights into the usage of the program, especially when the claimants are analyzed by their socio-demographic characteristics. This subsection examines the usage of the program by looking at 2 different ratios: the total benefits-to-contributions ratio (total B/C ratio) and the regular benefits-to-contributions ratio (regular B/C ratio) for 2022.Footnote 13 The tax data for the calendar year 2022 are the latest data available on contributions levels to calculate these ratios. As EI contributions are not assigned to specific benefit types, reductions in EI contributions related to special benefits are taken into account in the calculation of the regular B/C ratio.Footnote 14

The total B/C ratios and the regular B/C ratios presented below are normalized, with the ratio for Canada set at 1.0. Consequently, the adjusted total and regular B/C ratios provide a quick interpretation on the net usage of the EI program by socio-demographic characteristics relative to the national level. An adjusted ratio higher than 1.0 means that the underlying sub-population (such as region or industry) received comparatively more benefits than contributions made relative to the Canadian average and is a net beneficiary of the EI program. On the other hand, an adjusted ratio lower than 1.0 means that the representing sub-population received comparatively less benefits than contributions made relative to the national level and is a net contributor.

In 2022, the Atlantic provinces had adjusted total B/C ratios significantly above the national average, meaning claimants from these jurisdictions received comparatively more in EI benefits than the contributions made to the EI program (consult Chart 2). This is in line with previous years, as regions with larger share of seasonal claimants tend to record a greater use of EI benefits by claimants in these regions compared with other regions. On the other hand, Ontario and British Columbia had adjusted total B/C ratios below the national average, as claimants in these provinces received comparatively less in EI benefits than the contributions made to the EI program. The remaining provinces and territories had ratios very close to the national level.

Chart 2 – Adjusted benefits-to-contributions (B/C) ratios and unemployment rate by province and territory*, Canada, 2022
Chart 2: description follows
Text description for Chart 2
Province or territory Adjusted total benefits-to contributions ratio (left scale) Adjusted regular benefits-to contributions ratio (left scale) Adjusted benefits-to contributions ratio for Canada (left scale) Unemployment rate (right scale)
Newfoundland and Labrador 4.12 5.26 1.00 11.3%
Prince Edward Island 3.19 3.43 1.00 7.6%
Nova Scotia 1.78 2.07 1.00 6.5%
New Brunswick 2.53 3.08 1.00 7.2%
Quebec 1.03 1.09 1.00 4.3%
Ontario 0.81 0.73 1.00 5.6%
Manitoba 1.05 1.03 1.00 4.6%
Saskatchewan 1.07 1.09 1.00 4.7%
Alberta 0.94 0.91 1.00 5.8%
British Columbia 0.79 0.70 1.00 4.6%
Yukon 0.93 0.96 1.00 4.5%
Northwest Territories 0.91 0.95 1.00 5.6%
Nunavut 1.11 1.17 1.00 14.0%
  • * Provincial and territorial B/C ratios are determined by the residence of employees for premiums paid and by the residence of claimants for benefits received.
  • Consult Annex 2.30 for more details.
  • Sources: Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), T4 slips with employment income (for data on contributions). Results are based on 100% of CRA data. Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC), Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data (for data on benefits). Results are based on 100% of EI administrative data. Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, Tables 14-10-0287-01 and 14-10-0292-01 (for data on unemployment rates).

When only considering EI regular benefits, the adjusted regular B/C ratios by province and territory in 2022 were similar to their respective adjusted total B/C ratios.

With the general improvement in labour market conditions in 2022 and the end of the EI temporary measures on September 24, 2022 that were introduced to respond to the economic and labour market disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of EI regular claims established and amount of EI benefits paid decreased close to pre-pandemic levels. The EI premium rate in 2022 remained frozen at the 2020 level. As a result, the amount of EI contributions made stayed relatively unchanged. In this context, the adjusted total B/C ratio and adjusted regular B/C ratio for all provinces and territories returned to pre-pandemic levels. This is illustrated in Chart 3 which compares the adjusted regular B/C ratios for 2019 and 2022 by province and territory. The Atlantic provinces still received comparatively more benefits than contributions made compared to the Canadian average in 2022, while Ontario and British Columbia remained below the Canadian average.

Chart 3 – Adjusted regular benefits-to-contributions (B/C) ratios by province and territory*, Canada, 2019 and 2022
Chart 3: description follows
Text description for Chart 3
Province or territory Adjusted regular benefits-to contributions ratio for 2019 Adjusted regular benefits-to contributions ratio for 2022 Adjusted regular benefits-to contributions ratio for Canada
Newfoundland and Labrador 5.37 5.26 1.00
Prince Edward Island 3.37 3.43 1.00
Nova Scotia 2.20 2.07 1.00
New Brunswick 2.99 3.08 1.00
Quebec 1.07 1.09 1.00
Ontario 0.71 0.73 1.00
Manitoba 0.98 1.03 1.00
Saskatchewan 1.19 1.09 1.00
Alberta 0.96 0.91 1.00
British Columbia 0.70 0.70 1.00
Yukon 1.09 0.96 1.00
Northwest Territories 1.21 0.95 1.00
Nunavut 1.12 1.17 1.00
  • * Provincial and territorial B/C ratios are determined by the residence of employees for premiums paid and by the residence of claimants for benefits received.
  • Consult Annex 2.30 for more details on 2022.
  • Sources: Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), T4 slips with employment income (for data on contributions). Results are based on a 10% sample of CRA data for 2019 and 100% of CRA data for 2022. Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC), Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data (for data on benefits). Results are based on a 10% sample of EI administrative data for 2019 and 100% of EI administrative data for 2022.

In terms of gender, Table 6 outlines that, as in the past, women had a higher adjusted total B/C ratio (1.15) than men (0.88) in 2022. This is partly due to the fact that women aged 25 to 44 are more likely to receive EI maternity or parental benefits or both. Trends are generally reversed when only EI regular benefits are considered. Men showed a higher adjusted regular B/C ratio (1.14) than women (0.83) in 2022. This was a change from 2021 where adjusted regular B/C ratios were identical for both genders (1.00) due to the EI temporary measures in place during the period, which facilitated access to the EI program.

Table 6 – Adjusted benefits-to-contributions (B/C) ratios by gender and age, Canada, 2022
Age category Adjusted total B/C ratio for men Adjusted total B/C ratio for women Adjusted total B/C ratio for both genders Adjusted regular B/C ratio for men Adjusted regular B/C ratio for women Adjusted regular B/C ratio for both genders
24 years old and under 1.04 0.98 1.01 1.32 0.77 1.08
25 to 44 years old 0.79 1.53 1.12 0.99 0.71 0.87
45 to 54 years old 0.72 0.64 0.68 0.96 0.78 0.87
55 years old and over 1.17 0.91 1.06 1.61 1.19 1.42
Total 0.88 1.15 1.00 1.14 0.83 1.00

Sources: Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), T4 slips with employment income (for data on contributions). Results are based on 100% of CRA data. Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC), Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data (for data on benefits). Results are based on 100% of EI administrative data.

Similar to pre-pandemic levels, in 2022, claimants aged 25 to 44 years had the highest adjusted total B/C ratio, while those aged 55 years and over had the highest adjusted regular B/C ratio. This is a change from 2021 where claimants aged 24 years and under had the highest adjusted ratios for both total and regular benefits due to the EI temporary measures. Their adjusted ratios were still above 1.0 in 2022 but were lower than those in 2021.

Similar to the previous year, in 2022, claimants working in the goods-producing industries were net beneficiaries of the EI program, while those working in the services-producing industries were net contributors (consult Annex 2.30). This may be due to the larger proportion of seasonal employment in the goods-producing industries, notably the Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting industry and the Construction industry. As seasonal employment fluctuates during certain periods of the year, workers employed in these industries generally rely on EI benefits during the "off-seasons", leading to higher adjusted regular B/C ratios.

In 2022, 2 industries received significantly more in EI regular benefits for each dollar they contributed in premiums than before the COVID-19 pandemic: the Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting industry (4.22 in 2022 compared to 3.90 in 2019), and the Accommodation and food services industries (1.49 in 2022 compared to 1.14 in 2019), mostly due to the ongoing economic disruptions caused by the COVID‑19 pandemic (consult Chart 4).

Chart 4 – Adjusted regular benefits-to-contributions (B/C) ratios by industry, Canada, 2019 and 2022
Chart 4: description follows
Text description for Chart 4
Industry Adjusted regular benefits-to contributions ratio for 2019 Adjusted regular benefits-to contributions ratio for 2022 Adjusted regular benefits-to contributions ratio for Canada
Goods-producing industries 1.91 1.74 1.00
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 3.90 4.22 1.00
Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 1.58 1.15 1.00
Utilities 0.41 0.32 1.00
Construction 3.28 2.72 1.00
Manufacturing 0.94 0.93 1.00
Services-producing industries 0.74 0.78 1.00
Wholesale trade and retail trade 0.74 0.73 1.00
Transportation and warehousing 0.97 1.00 1.00
Finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing 0.46 0.41 1.00
Professional, scientific and technical services 0.70 0.63 1.00
Business, building and other support services* 1.37 1.36 1.00
Educational services 0.96 1.10 1.00
Health care and social assistance 0.35 0.47 1.00
Information, culture and recreation** 0.92 0.90 1.00
Accommodation and food services 1.14 1.49 1.00
Other services (except public administration) 1.02 1.05 1.00
Public administration 0.47 0.51 1.00
  • * This industry sector comprises the industries with codes 55 (Management of companies and enterprises) and 56 (Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services).
  • ** This industry sector comprises the industries with codes 51 (Information and cultural industries) and 71 (Arts, entertainment and recreation).
  • Consult Annex 2.30 for more details on 2022.
  • Sources: Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), T4 slips with employment income (for data on contributions). Results are based on a 10% sample of CRA data for 2019 and 100% of CRA data for 2022. Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC), Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data (for data on benefits). Results are based on a 10% sample of EI administrative data for 2019 and 100% of EI administrative data for 2022.

The difference between the goods-producing industries and the services-producing industries is less significant for the adjusted total B/C ratio. This may be due in part to the larger proportion of women working in certain services-producing industries, such as the Health care and social assistance industry and the Educational services industry. Women can claim EI maternity or parental or both benefits and thus increase the relative use of EI benefits in these industries.

Study on the eligibility of temporary foreign workers for Employment Insurance benefits

In Canada, foreign nationals (i.e., temporary foreign workers) are authorized to work under the Temporary Foreign Worker Program (TFWP) or the International Mobility Program. Like Canadian workers, Temporary Foreign Workers (TFWs) along with their specific employers pay EI premiums and thereby contribute to the EI Operating account.

A recent departmental study* examined the relative number of EI beneficiaries and contributors among different streams of workers hired under the TFWP and assesses their impact on the EI Operating account. The study focuses on the 2011 to 2020 period, during which multiple policy changes to the TFWP took place, including significant reforms introduced from 2013 to 2015. The study uses Temporary Foreign Worker Program administrative data and Canadian Employer-Employee Dynamics Database at Statistics Canada.

Results from the study showed that from 2011 to 2020, the annual number of temporary foreign workers hired via the TFWP ranged between 105,435 and 160,000. Almost all, along side their employers, paid EI premiums. The study also noted that the share of TFWs who were issued a record of employment increased from about 30% prior to 2014 to 45% in 2020. Between 2011 and 2020, an average of 1.7% of TFWs who contributed to the program received EI benefits.

Over that period, the net contribution of TFWs to the EI Operating account represents an average of $131 million annually. The study showed that from every dollar of EI contribution paid (by the employees and their employer), TFWs receive an average of 9 cents of EI benefits,** whereas Canadian workers receive an average of 80 cents in EI benefits.*** The observed disparity between Canadians and TFWs typically widens during periods of labour market slackness (recession) or disruption (pandemic). TFWs are predominantly male, aged between 26 to 35, and live in the Western region and the Territories and therefore, their profile, work patterns and EI program usage are not comparable to the overall Canadian workers population.

  • * ESDC, Eligibility of Temporary Foreign Workers for Employment Insurance Benefits (Ottawa: ESDC, Evaluation Directorate, 2025).
  • ** Include any EI benefit types such as EI regular and special benefits.
  • *** These estimates of the amount of EI benefits paid relative to the contributions made are calculated using a different methodology than the one used to estimate the adjusted total B/C ratio included in subsection 2.1.3 of this report which is normalized, with the ratio for Canada set at 1.0.

2.2 Employment Insurance regular benefits

In this section

Employment Insurance (EI) regular benefits are designed to provide temporary income support to partially replace lost employment income for eligible claimants to help them find a new job and stay active in the labour force.

Claimants qualify for EI regular benefits if they:

  • are unemployed
  • have worked a minimum number of hours of insurable employment during their qualifying period (defined as either the previous 52 weeks or since the establishment of their last claim, whichever is shorter), ranging from 420 to 700 hours, depending on the regional unemployment rate where the claimant lived at the time of the claim, and
  • have had a valid reason for job separation according to the Employment Insurance Act

As mentioned in Section 2.1, 2 different sets of EI temporary measures were introduced over the past few years as the Canadian economy and job market recovered from the disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Under these temporary measures, the number of hours of insurable employment required to qualify for EI regular benefits varied over the past fiscal years, depending on when claims were established. For example, claims established in the first half of 2022‑23 required a minimum of 420 hours of insurable employment during the qualifying period to qualify for EI regular benefits, regardless of the regional unemployment rate. These temporary measures ended on September 25, 2022, and new claims established after that date were under the original EI rules.

In addition to meeting these eligibility criteria, claimants must also prove that they are capable of and available for work and unable to obtain suitable employment for each working day of their claim while claiming regular benefits.Footnote 15

2.2.1. Employment Insurance regular claims and benefits paid

The number of new EI regular claims established in 2023‑24 was 1.37 million, which was higher than the number of regular claims established in 2022‑23 (1.29 million) and before the pandemic (1.30 million in 2017‑18 and 1.29 million in 2018‑19).

In general, the number of new claims established for EI regular benefits during a given period tends to be influenced by labour market conditions and overall economic cycles. During periods of economic growth and favourable labour market conditions, it is expected that fewer claims for EI regular benefits are established. Conversely, the opposite is expected to be seen during periods of economic stagnation and unfavourable labour market conditions.

Evaluation of the role of Employment Insurance as a stabilizer in economic recessions: a synthesis report

A key objective of the Employment Insurance (EI) program is to act as an automatic stabilizer of the economy during economic downturns. The stabilization role occurs through EI benefits paid to unemployed individuals and changes in premiums paid by employees and employers. During periods of rising unemployment, EI benefits increase while contributions decrease, helping to stimulate the economy. Conversely, in times of economic booms, the reverse occurs.

A departmental study* evaluates the stabilizing role of the EI program on employment and real gross domestic product (GDP) in Canada during the 2001‑02 economic downturn and the 2008‑09 financial crisis. To achieve this goal, the study simulates the impact of EI program on employment and real GDP during 2 periods of artificially prolonged downturns (2001‑04) and (2008‑11) using 2 distinct macroeconomic models for the Canadian economy. The analysis finds that during the 2001‑04 economic downturn, the EI's stabilising effect resulted in average annual increase of 31,000 jobs and a 0.39% rise in real GDP. Conversely, during the 2008‑11 downturn, the impact was even larger, with 60,000 additional jobs and a 0.65% higher real GDP on average per year. The analysis therefore concludes that the EI program played a more significant stabilizing role during the 2008‑09 recession than in the 2001‑02 slowdown. The findings of this study are consistent with previous studies in Canada and other OECD countries that underline the importance of EI and UI systems as economic stabilizers.

* ESDC, Evaluation of the Role of Employment Insurance as a Stabilizer in Economic Recessions. (Ottawa: ESDC, Policy Research Directorate, 2012)

As mentioned in Chapter 1, the Canadian economy experienced a slowdown in growth in 2023‑24 as well as a significant labour force increase (+2.7%) along with a moderate employment growth (+1.6%) compared to the previous fiscal year. Additionally, the national unemployment rate increased from an average of 5.1% in 2022‑23 to an average of 5.6% in 2023‑24. The easing of labour market conditions compared to 2022‑23 also contributed to the higher number of new claims established for EI regular benefits in 2023‑24. With the labour market conditions relatively similar to those just before the COVID‑19 pandemic, the higher number of new EI regular claims established in 2023‑24 compared to pre-pandemic years can be explained in part by the sharp increase in the labour force during the reporting period.

The total amount of EI regular benefits paid was $12.8 billion in 2023‑24, which was higher than the $12.3 billion in 2022‑23. This higher amount in benefits paid can be explained, in part, by the higher number of new regular claims established in 2023‑24. On average, there were almost 448,000 beneficiaries receiving EI regular benefits each month in 2023‑24 compared to 446,000 in 2022‑23.Footnote 16

Because the number of beneficiaries is based on previously established claims, these 2 measures generally trend in the same direction, with the count of beneficiaries usually lagging behind the number of new claims established. For example, an increase in the number of claims established for EI regular benefits after an economic shock would result in an increase in the number of beneficiaries following the increase in claims. However, the count of beneficiaries can still remain elevated even after the volume of new claims has subsided once the labour market conditions improve, as payments continue to be made on previously established claims until benefits are exhausted, or the claimants have found employment. The higher number of EI regular claims in 2023‑24 was reflected on the number of beneficiaries for the same fiscal year.

Employment Insurance regular claims and amount paid by province or territory, gender and age

Table 7 outlines the number of new EI regular claims established and the total amount paid in benefits by province and territory, gender and age category. The number of claims established for EI regular benefits in 2023‑24 was lower in Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick than in 2022‑23. The relative share of claims established across regions was similar in 2023‑24 to the previous fiscal year, except for a slight decrease in the Atlantic provinces compared to a small increase in Ontario.

Table 7 – Employment Insurance regular claims and amount paid by province and territory, gender and age, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ millions) 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 59,630 57,643 $843.7 $784.9
Prince Edward Island 14,340 14,985 $189.1 $177.9
Nova Scotia 55,050 53,649 $632.5 $573.7
New Brunswick 63,210 61,104 $782.1 $691.1
Quebec 376,680 395,053 $3,000.0 $3,075.7
Ontario 377,100 423,113 $3,412.9 $3,808.1
Manitoba 43,200 44,835 $430.1 $424.4
Saskatchewan 35,360 36,188 $403.0 $389.7
Alberta 125,980 140,200 $1,354.7 $1,433.5
British Columbia 134,280 143,956 $1,216.1 $1,403.7
Yukon 1,450 1,553 $16.5 $18.0
Northwest Territories 1,190 1,720 $16.0 $18.1
Nunavut 770 814 $13.2 $13.4
Men 759,990 829,115 $7,860.1 $8,421.9
Women 528,250 545,698 $4,449.9 $4,390.2
24 years old and under 117,230 127,012 $1,139.3 $1,099.4
25 to 44 years old 581,850 640,386 $5,358.9 $5,910.0
45 to 54 years old 249,830 260,187 $2,358.9 $2,406.5
55 years old and over 339,330 347,228 $3,452.9 $3,396.2
Canada 1,288,240 1,374,813 $12,310.0 $12,812.1
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.5 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

Chart 5 illustrates the distribution of the labour force across provinces in comparison with the distribution of EI regular claims in 2023-24. There was a higher share of EI regular claims established in the Atlantic provinces and in Quebec in 2023-24 than their relative share of the labour force.

Chart 5 – Proportion of Employment Insurance regular claims and labour force by province*, Canada, 2023‑24
Chart 5: description follows
Text description for Chart 5
Province Share of labour force (%) Share of regular claims established (%)
Newfoundland and Labrador 1.2% 4.2%
Prince Edward Island 0.5% 1.1%
Nova Scotia 2.5% 3.9%
New Brunswick 1.9% 4.4%
Quebec 21.9% 28.7%
Ontario 39.5% 30.8%
Manitoba 3.5% 3.3%
Saskatchewan 2.9% 2.6%
Alberta 12.1% 10.2%
British Columbia 14.0% 10.5%
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Since the Territories represent a small share of EI regular claims established, they were not included in this chart.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data. Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, Table 14-10-0287-01.

The regular benefits paid out decreased in 6 out of 13 jurisdictions in 2023‑24 compared to the previous fiscal year. The largest decline was recorded in the Atlantic provinces due, in part, to a smaller number of new EI regular claims established during 2023‑24. There was also a decrease in the regular benefits paid out in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, while the rest of the provinces and territories had an increase. The share of benefits paid to claimants from Ontario went from 27.7% in 2022‑23 to 29.7% in 2023‑24, representing the highest share of EI regular benefits paid in 2023‑24.

The majority of EI regular claims in 2023‑24 were established by men (60.3%), similar to previous years. In terms of regular benefits paid out, the total amount increased for men and decreased for women compared to 2022‑23. Women accounted for a lower share of EI regular benefits paid in 2023‑24 (34.3%) than in 2022‑23 (36.1%) and returned to pre-pandemic levels (33.6% in 2019‑20). This lower share of EI regular benefits paid to women compared to the pandemic period (44.2% in 2021‑22) can be partly attributed to the end of the EI temporary measures, which, among other things, likely increased the weekly benefit rate of women to a greater extent than that of men.

All age groups registered an increase in their number of EI regular claims established in 2023‑24. In contrast, only claimants aged between 25 to 54 years recorded a rise in regular benefits paid out in the reporting period compared to 2022‑23. Claimants aged between 25 and 44 years accounted for the largest share of claims established for EI regular benefits (46.6%) and benefits paid out (46.1%) in 2023‑24. Conversely, claimants aged 24 years and under accounted for the smallest share of both EI regular claims (9.2%) and benefits paid out (8.6%) during the fiscal year. The relative share of claims established across age groups was similar in 2023‑24 to the previous fiscal year.

Employment Insurance regular claims and amount paid by industry

As outlined in Table 8, the number of new EI regular claims established in 2023‑24 increased in both goods-producing and services-producing industries from the previous year. Services-producing industries accounted for the majority (60.4%) of EI regular claims established in 2023‑24. This represented a small increase of 0.3 percentage points (p.p.) from 2022‑23. The Educational services industry continued to account for the largest share of new EI regular claims among the services-producing industries in 2023‑24 (13.5%), although recording a decrease in its share from the previous fiscal year (‑1.5 p.p.).

Table 8 – Employment Insurance regular claims and amount paid by industry, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24
Industry New claims established
(% share) 2022‑23
New claims established
(% share) 2023‑24
Amount paid ($ millions)
(% share) 2022‑23
Amount paid ($ millions)
(% share) 2023‑24
Goods-producing industries 474,160
(36.8%)
513,992
(37.4%)
$4,858.9
(39.5%)
$5,189.5
(40.5%)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 51,410
(4.0%)
48,672
(3.5%)
$615.6
(5.0%)
$573.3
(4.5%)
Mining, quarrying, oil and gas extraction 20,260
(1.6%)
23,064
(1.7%)
$251.5
(2.0%)
$274.9
(2.1%)
Utilities 3,690
(0.3%)
3,467
(0.3%)
$35.9
(0.3%)
$34.0
(0.3%)
Construction 279,670
(21.7%)
306,784
(22.3%)
$2,762.5
(22.4%)
$3,056.9
(23.9%)
Manufacturing 119,130
(9.2%)
132,005
(9.6%)
$1,193.4
(9.7%)
$1,250.4
(9.8%)
Services-producing industries 774,430
(60.1%)
831,039
(60.4%)
$7,080.3
(57.5%)
$7,331.2
(57.2%)
Wholesale and retail trade 97,250
(7.5%)
108,873
(7.9%)
$1,073.3
(8.7%)
$1,078.2
(8.4%)
Transportation and warehousing 63,330
(4.9%)
67,084
(4.9%)
$571.7
(4.6%)
$570.1
(4.5%)
Finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing 26,920
(2.1%)
32,958
(2.4%)
$320.6
(2.6%)
$360.8
(2.8%)
Professional, scientific and technical services 65,120
(5.1%)
74,932
(5.5%)
$647.2
(5.3%)
$901.3
(7.0%)
Business, building and other support services* 84,470
(6.6%)
97,566
(7.1%)
$872.9
(7.1%)
$964.8
(7.5%)
Educational services 193,530
(15.0%)
185,799
(13.5%)
$1,059.3
(8.6%)
$963.3
(7.5%)
Health care and social assistance 49,980
(3.9%)
49,827
(3.6%)
$530.4
(4.3%)
$438.2
(3.4%)
Information, culture and recreation** 37,330
(2.9%)
49,278
(3.6%)
$343.9
(2.8%)
$472.5
(3.7%)
Accommodation and food services 55,430
(4.3%)
62,020
(4.5%)
$526.7
(4.3%)
$531.9
(4.2%)
Other services (excluding public administration) 36,800
(2.9%)
37,219
(2.7%)
$385.5
(3.1%)
$366.9
(2.9%)
Public administration 64,270
(5.0%)
65,483
(4.8%)
$748.8
(6.1%)
$683.2
(5.3%)
Unclassified industries *** 39,650
(3.1%)
29,782
(2.2%)
$370.7
(3.0%)
$291.4
(2.3%)
Canada 1,288,240
(100.0%)
1,374,813
(100.0%)
$12,310.0
(100.0%)
$12,812.1
(100.0%)
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Percentage shares are based on unrounded numbers. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * This industry sector comprises the industries with codes 55 (Management of companies and enterprises) and 56 (Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services).
  • ** This industry sector comprises the industries with codes 51 (Information and cultural industries) and 71 (Arts, entertainment and recreation).
  • *** For some claims, this information was not available in the data.
  • Consult Annex 2.6 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

Goods-producing industries accounted for 37.4% of the share of new EI regular claims established in 2023‑24. The Construction industry continued to hold the largest share of new EI regular claims (22.3%) and had the highest increase in its share (+0.6 p.p.) among the goods-producing industries compared to the previous fiscal year.

In terms of amount paid, services-producing industries accounted for 57.2% of regular benefits paid out in 2023‑24, down from 57.5% in 2022‑23, whereas goods-producing industries represented 40.5% of regular benefits paid out, up from 39.5% over the same period. The breakdown of regular benefits paid across industry group in 2023‑24 was similar to the one observed before the pandemic. Of all industries, the Construction industry accounted for the highest share (23.9%) of benefits paid in the fiscal year examined.

Employment Insurance benefit repayments

EI benefit payments are taxable income, regardless of the type of benefits. Depending on their net income and whether they received EI regular benefits, including fishing benefits, individuals may be required to repay some of the EI benefits at the time they file income tax returns.

In accordance with the Employment Insurance Act, claimants must repay a percentage of EI benefits they received if their net incomeFootnote 17 in a given year exceeds 1.25 times the maximum yearly insurable earnings.Footnote 18 Claimants whose net income exceeded that threshold were required to repay 30% of the lesser of:

  • the net income in excess of the threshold, or
  • the total regular benefits, including fishing benefits, paid to the claimant in the taxation year

Claimants who received EI special benefits are exempt from the benefit repayment requirement.Footnote 19 In addition, claimants who received less than one week of EI regular or fishing benefits in the preceding 10 taxation years are also exempt from repaying benefits.

The threshold was $75,375 for the 2022 taxation year, which was the most recent data available at the time this report was produced. In the 2022 taxation year, almost 178,000 EI claimants repaid a total of $289.2 million in EI benefits. These numbers decreased compared to the 2021 taxation year in which 245,000 EI claimants repaid a total of $450.6 million in EI benefits. This decrease is attributed in part to the lower number of claims established for EI benefits in 2022‑23 compared to 2021-22, and to the end of the EI temporary measures put in place in response to the COVID‑19 pandemic. On average, each EI claimant subject to the benefit repayment provision repaid $1,628 in 2022, while they received $6,871 in EI benefits in the same year.

In 2022, Quebec and Ontario together accounted for slightly more than half of EI claimants who repaid benefits, while they accounted for slightly less than half of all benefits repaid (consult Table 9). This was also the case in previous years.

Table 9 – Employment Insurance claimants who repaid benefits and amount repaid by province or territory, gender and age, Canada, 2022 taxation year
Category EI claimants who repaid benefits Amount repaid ($ millions)
Newfoundland and Labrador 11,382 $32.5
Prince Edward Island 1,504 $6.0
Nova Scotia 6,715 $19.0
New Brunswick 5,732 $13.5
Quebec 52,337 $63.0
Ontario 43,665 $62.0
Manitoba 3,314 $5.4
Saskatchewan 4,847 $8.3
Alberta 28,217 $49.0
British Columbia 19,176 $29.3
Yukon 252 $0.5
Northwest Territories 262 $0.5
Nunavut 97 $0.2
Non-residents of Canada 69 $0.1
Men 152,804 $250.4
Women 24,765 $38.8
24 years old and under 4,431 $6.5
25 to 44 years old 79,839 $112.9
45 to 54 years old 39,303 $64.0
55 years old and over 53,996 $105.7
Canada 177,569 $289.2
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding.
  • Consult Annex 2.28 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Men continued to account for the majority of EI claimants who repaid benefits in 2022. They also accounted for the majority of benefits repaid, their share of the total amount repaid increasing from 83.4% in 2021 to 86.6% in 2022.

In terms of age groups, claimants aged between 25 and 44 years continued to account for the largest share of individuals who repaid benefits and of benefits repaid in 2022.

Claimants who had worked in the goods-producing industries continued to account for the majority of individuals who repaid benefits and of the total benefits repaid in 2022. Their share among all claimants who repaid benefits increased in 2022 (+3.0 p.p.) compared to 2021. Similarly, their share of the total benefits repaid increased during the same period (+5.5 p.p.). The Construction industry continued in 2022 to account for the largest share of EI claimants who repaid benefits (43.9%) and of benefits repaid (38.8%) (consult Annex 2.28).

Employment Insurance regular benefits and firms

According to the 2022 tax data,Footnote 20 which were the most recent data available at the time this report was produced, approximately 1.32 million firmsFootnote 21 were operating in Canada in 2022 (consult Table 10). Among them, 26.0% (341,600 firms) employed at least one employee who had received EI regular benefits during that year.

Table 10 – Firms, employment and Employment Insurance regular claimants by size* of firms, Canada, 2022
Firm size* Number of firms
(all firms)
Number of firms with at least one employee receiving EI regular benefits Employment distribution** (% share) EI claimant distribution*** (% share)
Small 1,193,372 245,476 21.0% 28.2%
Small-medium 101,110 75,967 19.4% 23.6%
Medium-large 17,434 16,675 16.2% 16.4%
Large 3,472 3,462 43.4% 31.8%
Canada 1,315,388 341,580 100.0% 100.0%
  • Note: Data may not add up due to rounding.
  • * Small-sized firms are defined as those that employ 1 to 19 employees. The category also includes tax records for which the firm's size could not be determined. Small-to-medium sized firms employ 20 to 99 employees. Medium-to-large sized firms employ 100 to 499 employees. Large-sized firms employ 500 employees or more.
  • ** The number of workers in a firm is the number of individuals with employment income in that firm, as indicated on a T4 form. The number of workers is adjusted so that each individual in the labour force is only counted once and individuals who work for more than one firm are taken into account. For example, if an employee earned $25,000 in firm 1 and $25,000 in firm 2, then he or she was recorded as 0.5 employees at the first firm and 0.5 employees at the second firm.
  • *** These are based on the number of people receiving EI regular benefits in 2022.
  • Sources: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of EI administrative data. Canada Revenue Agency, CRA administrative data. Results are based on 100% of CRA data.

As in the past, the proportion of firms which employed at least one employee receiving EI regular benefits increased with firm size. In 2022, 20.6% of small-sized firms had at least one former employee who received EI regular benefits. That ratio increased to 75.1% for small-to-medium sized firms, 95.6% for medium-to-large sized firms and 99.7% for large-sized firms.

Similar to previous years, employees from smaller firms are found to be overrepresented among claimants for EI regular benefits when comparing the distribution of claimants by firm size to the distribution of the workforce by firm size. As shown in Table 10, small firms accounted for 21.0% of the total workforce, while they represented 28.2% of the claimants for EI regular benefits in 2022. Similarly, small-to-medium sized firms accounted for 19.4% of the workforce and 23.6% of claimants. On the other hand, large-sized firms accounted for 43.4% of the workforce, but only 31.8% of claimants. This suggests that smaller-sized firms are more vulnerable to difficult business or economic conditions than large firms are (for instance, economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic). As a result, these firms may be more likely to make broader adjustments to their workforces, resulting in a larger share of employees claiming EI regular benefits because of layoffs. Moreover, industry-related characteristics such as the greater prevalence of seasonal jobs in small-sized firms may have an influence, as these firms are generally more likely to rely on EI benefits, relative to the national average in some industries.Footnote 22

Employment Insurance regular claims and amount paid by EI claimant category

This report assigns EI regular claims to 1 of 3 claimant categories based on the claimant's EI premiums paid and EI benefits used in the past few years. Prior to their current claim, long-tenured workers generally had strong labour market attachment and low EI benefits usage. Frequent claimants had established multiple EI claims and received several weeks of EI benefits over the past few years. Claims that do not fall in these first 2 categories are classified as occasional claimants.Footnote 23 When it comes to the relationship between claimant category and age group, long-tenured workers tend to be spread out across claimants aged 35 to 44 years, 45 to 55 years, and 55 years and over. Frequent claimants tend to be men, aged 55 years and over, from the Atlantic provinces and in the goods‑producing industries.

Table 11 outlines the number of claims established for EI regular benefits and the amount paid by EI claimant category. The number of claims established in 2023‑24 slightly decreased among frequent claimants but increased among long-tenured workers and occasional claimants compared to the previous fiscal year. Overall, occasional claimants continued to account for more than half (57.0%) of the share of EI regular claims established in 2023‑24.

Table 11 – Employment Insurance regular claims and amount paid by EI claimant category, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24
Claimant category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ millions) 2023‑24
Long-tenured workers 278,840 312,990 $2,551.1 $2,627.1
Occasional claimants 729,900 783,196 $6,650.0 $7,044.7
Frequent claimants 279,500 278,627 $3,108.9 $3,140.3
Canada 1,288,240 1,374,813 $12,310.0 $12,812.1
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.5 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

In terms of EI regular benefits paid, all claimant categories had an increase in 2023‑24 compared to 2022‑23. Occasional claimants accounted for more than half (55.0%) of benefits paid in 2023‑24, followed by frequent claimants (24.5%) and long-tenured workers (20.5%).

In general, the shares of both claims established for regular benefits and benefits paid appear to be trending towards pre-pandemic level across claimant categories (consult Annex 2.5.1).

Employment Insurance regular claims by hours of insurable employment and unemployment rate in the Employment Insurance economic region of establishment

Claimants must have worked a minimum number of hours of insurable employment in their qualifying period, ranging from 420 to 700 hours, in order to qualify for EI regular benefits. The number of required hours to qualify depends on the unemployment rate in the EI economic region where the claimant resides at the time of submitting the application for EI and is known as the Variable Entrance Requirement (VER) (consult Table 12). The higher the unemployment rate in a given region, the lower the number of hours needed to qualify for EI regular benefits and vice versa (consult Annex 2.2 for the full breakdown). A detailed discussion on the eligibility and access to EI regular benefits is provided in subsection 2.2.2.

Table 12 – Variable entrance requirement
EI regional unemployment rate Variable entrance requirement
6.0% and under 700 hours
6.1% to 7.0% 665 hours
7.1% to 8.0% 630 hours
8.1% to 9.0% 595 hours
9.1% to 10.0% 560 hours
10.1% to 11.0% 525 hours
11.1% to 12.0% 490 hours
12.1% to 13.0% 455 hours
More than 13.0% 420 hours

Chart 6 illustrates the distribution of EI regular claims by the number of hours of insurable employment that were used to qualify for these benefits, for men and women. In general, men accumulate more hours of insurable employment than women prior to establishing a claim. In 2023‑24, claimants who accumulated 1,820 or more hours of insurable employment during their qualifying period accounted for the largest share (31.6%) of EI regular claims established by men, while it accounted for only 21.3% of EI regular claims established by women. Claimants who accumulated between 420 and 699 hours accounted for the smallest share for both genders, but women had a slightly higher share (2.8%) than men (2.5%). Overall, almost half (49.0%) of EI regular claims established by men had 1,540 hours of insurable employment or more, while it was 38.3% for women.

Chart 6 – Share of Employment Insurance regular claims by hours of insurable employment and gender, Canada, 2023‑24
Chart 6: description follows
Text description for Chart 6
Hours of insurable employment Share of claims (% of total) men Share of claims (% of total) women
420 to 699 hours 2.5% 2.8%
700 to 979 hours 15.7% 17.5%
980 to 1,259 hours 16.6% 19.3%
1,260 to 1,539 hours 16.2% 22.0%
1,540 to 1,819 hours 17.4% 17.0%
1,820 hours and more 31.6% 21.3%
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.7 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Table 13 details the number and distribution of EI regular claims established in 2023‑24, as well as the labour force and the unemployed population by regional unemployment rate. Consult Table 12 for the minimum number of hours of insurable employment required to qualify for EI regular benefits, depending on the regional unemployment rate. In general, the distribution of EI regular claims across regional unemployment rates during 2023‑24 remained similar to the distribution of unemployed individuals reported in the Labour Force Survey. EI economic regions with an unemployment rate at 6% and lower represented the majority of EI regular claims established (61.6%), of the labour force (62.6%) and of the unemployed population (53.4%).

Table 13 – Number and share of Employment Insurance regular claims by regional unemployment rate*, Canada, 2023‑24
Unemployment rate Number of claims (thousands) (% share) 2023‑24 Labour force (thousands) (% share) 2023‑24 Number of unemployed (thousands) (% share) 2023‑24
0.1% to 6% 846.3
(61.6%)
13,580.8
(62.6%)
692.6
(53.4%)
6.1% to 7% 288.3
(21.0%)
5,841.4
(26.9%)
385.8
(29.7%)
7.1% to 8% 45.0
(3.3%)
1,127.0
(5.2%)
85.2
(6.6%)
8.1% to 9% 39.0
(2.8%)
370.3
(1.7%)
31.8
(2.5%)
9.1% to 10% 39.3
(2.9%)
129.3
(0.6%)
12.3
(0.9%)
10.1% to 11% 34.5
(2.5%)
202.5
(0.9%)
21.9
(1.7%)
11.1% to 12% 16.6
(1.2%)
87.7
(0.4%)
10.5
(0.8%)
12.1% to 13% 13.1
(1.0%)
50.8
(0.2%)
6.4
(0.5%)
13.1% to 14% 31.4
(2.3%)
124.2
(0.6%)
17.0
(1.3%)
14.1% to 15% 10.3
(0.8%)
72.3
(0.3%)
10.5
(0.8%)
15.1% to 16% 2.5
(0.2%)
30.4
(0.1%)
4.7
(0.4%)
16.1% or higher 8.5
(0.6%)
61.7
(0.3%)
19.3
(1.5%)
Canada 1,374.8
(100.0%)
21,678.4
(100.0%)
1,297.9
(100.0%)
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Unemployment rates used for the Employment Insurance program are a 3-month moving average of seasonally adjusted rates of unemployment produced by Statistics Canada, as per section 17 of the Employment Insurance Regulations.
  • Consult Annex 2.7 for more details.
  • Sources: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data (for EI regular claims). Statistics Canada, special tabulations from the Labour Force Survey (for labour force and unemployment).

The share of EI regular claims established in EI economic regions with an unemployment rate at 6% or lower has increased significantly over the past fiscal years. As presented in Chart 7, these regions accounted for 29.6% of EI regular claims established in 2017‑18 compared to 50.1% in 2019‑20 and 61.6% in 2023‑24. This was likely due to the decrease in the unemployment rate in Canada in the years before the COVID‑19 pandemic, as well as the relatively low unemployment rate recorded in 2023‑24.

Chart 7 ─ National unemployment rate and share of Employment Insurance regular claims by regional unemployment rate*, Canada, 2017‑18 to 2019‑20 and 2022‑23 to 2023‑24**
Chart 7: description follows
Text description for Chart 7
Category Share of claims (%) 2017‑18 Share of claims (%) 2018‑19 Share of claims (%) 2019‑20 Share of claims (%) 2022‑23 Share of claims (%) 2023‑24
Regional unemployment rate: 6.0% or less 29.6% 31.8% 50.1% 64.9% 61.6%
Regional unemployment rate: 6.1% to 8.0% 43.1% 47.1% 30.6% 21.1% 24.2%
Regional unemployment rate: 8.1% to 10.0% 11.0% 4.2% 3.3% 2.5% 5.7%
Regional unemployment rate: 10.1% to 13.0% 6.3% 7.0% 6.4% 5.9% 4.7%
Regional unemployment rate: 13.1% or more 10.1% 9.9% 9.6% 5.7% 3.8%
National unemployment rate 6.2% 5.8% 5.9% 5.1% 5.6%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Unemployment rates used for the Employment Insurance program are a 3-month moving average of seasonally adjusted rates of unemployment produced by Statistics Canada, as per section 17 of the Employment Insurance Regulations.
  • ** Results are not presented for 2020‑21 and 2021‑22 because a minimum unemployment rate of 13.1% was in effect between September 27, 2020 and September 25,2021 due to the first set of EI temporary measures.
  • Consult Annex 2.7 for more details.
  • Sources: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2017‑18 to 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24 (for EI regular claims). Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, Table 14-10-0287-01 (for unemployment rate).

Claimants' obligations to search for and accept suitable employment

Under the Employment Insurance Act, EI regular benefits claimants must be capable of and available for work and be unable to obtain suitable employment. This requirement, which must be met in order to receive EI regular benefits, can be demonstrated through reasonable and customary efforts to obtain suitable employment. Footnote 24

Claimants may be disentitled from receiving EI regular benefits when they fail to meet a specific entitlement condition. A disentitlement applies on a day-to-day basis for as long as the claimants' situation remains unchanged. Claimants may be disqualified from receiving EI regular benefits due to their specific action or inaction. The disqualification can be either indefinite or for a specific number of complete weeks.

Table 14 outlines the number of disqualifications and disentitlements related to refusal of suitable work and failure to search for work in past fiscal years. In 2023‑24, there were a total of 450 disqualifications and disentitlements related to failure to search for work and 80 related to refusal of suitable work. These results are higher than the previous fiscal year but remained significantly below pre-pandemic levels. However, refusal of suitable work and failure to search for work represent only a fraction (less than 1.0%) of all disqualifications and disentitlements in the fiscal year. The results also do not take into consideration that benefits would generally have been reinstated after claimants who were disentitled demonstrated that they were once again fulfilling their responsibilities, or after claimants who were disqualified served their weeks of disqualification.

Table 14 – Number of Employment Insurance disqualifications and disentitlements related to refusal of suitable work and failure to search for work, Canada, 2017‑18 to 2023‑24*
Type of disqualification or disentitlement 2017‑18 2018‑19 2019‑20 2021‑22 2022‑23 2023‑24
Refusal of suitable work 130 170 180 50 50 80
Failure to search for work 1,730 1,430 1,190 220 240 450
  • * The total for 2019‑20 is calculated using monthly estimates from April 2019 to February 2020, and excludes data for the month of March 2020. Additionally, 2020‑21 is excluded from the table because no new claims for EI regular benefits could be established between March 15 and September 26, 2020, when the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) was introduced. As a result, the Employment Insurance Statistics program was suspended between the March and September 2020 reference months. Consequently, data on the number of EI disqualifications and disentitlements are not available for this period.
  • Source: Statistics Canada, monthly Employment Insurance disqualifications and disentitlements, Table 14-10-0004-01.

2.2.2 Coverage, eligibility and access to Employment Insurance regular benefits for the unemployed population

As mentioned at the beginning of Section 2.2, there are 3 eligibility criteria to qualify for EI regular benefits. The claimant must have:

  1. had insurable employment and paid EI premiums during the qualifying period (defined as either the previous 52 weeks or since the establishment of their last claim, whichever is shorter)
  2. a valid reason for job separation according to the Employment Insurance Act
  3. worked a minimum number of hours of insurable employment (ranging from 420 hours and 700 hours, depending on the regional unemployment rate where the claimant lived at the time of the establishment of the claim) during the qualifying period

This subsection provides an overview of the unemployed population in Canada for 2023 relative to these 3 eligibility criteria and presents measures of coverage, eligibility, and access to EI regular benefits for the unemployed population. Results are from the Employment Insurance Coverage Survey (EICS),Footnote 25 published annually by Statistics Canada. The survey provides statistics on the contributors and non-contributors to the EI program among the unemployed population in the calendar year, as well as on the eligible recipients and those who did not qualify for EI regular benefits. The survey also provides information on the take-up of EI maternity and parental benefits in Canada (consult subsection 2.6.3). Estimates of the unemployed population eligible for EI regular benefits (that is, the eligibility rates) are also presented based on the Records of Employment (ROEs) for 2023‑24 compared to previous years.

Chart 8 illustrates the distribution of the unemployed population in Canada in 2023 in terms of their eligibility for EI regular benefits. On average, there were 1,127,000 unemployed individuals per month in Canada in 2023. Of them, 382,800 (34.0%) individuals did not pay EI premiums during the year because they did not work in the previous 12 months or never worked, or because they were self-employed or unpaid family workers. The other 744,200 (66.0%) unemployed individuals in 2023 paid EI premiums in the 12 months prior to becoming unemployed and were covered by the EI program.

Chart 8 – Distribution of the unemployed population in terms of eligibility for Employment Insurance regular benefits, Canada, 2023*
Chart 8: description follows
Text description for Chart 8
(U) Total Unemployed: 1,127,000 (100%) Description
(A) Unemployed individuals who did not pay premiums: 382,800 (34,0%)
  • (A1) Individuals who did not work in the previous 12 months or never worked: 324,400 (28.8%)
  • (A2) Individuals who were self-employed or unpaid family workers: 58,400 (5.2%)
(B) EI premium-paying unemployed individuals with an invalid reason for job separation: 72,100 (6.4%)
  • (B1) Individuals who quit without a just cause: 21,500 (1.9%)**
  • (B2) Individuals who quit to go to school: 50,600 (4.5%)
(C) Potentially eligible unemployed individuals but with insufficient hours of insurable employment: 113,300 (10.1%) (C1) Individuals who did not have sufficient hours of insurable employment: 113,300 (10.1%)
(D) Unemployed individuals eligible for EI regular benefits with enough hours of insurable employment: 558,800 (49.6%)
  • (D1) Individuals who received EI regular benefits in the reference week: 278,000 (24.7%)
  • (D2) Benefits temporarily interrupted or waiting to receive benefits, or received another type of EI benefits that regular benefits in the reference week: 66,000 (5.9%)
  • (D3) Individuals who did not claim or receive benefits for unknown reasons: 101,800 (9.0%)
  • (D4) Individuals who did not receive EI regular benefits during the reference week but received and exhausted EI benefits in the past 12 months: 113,000 (10.0%)
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding.
  • * Estimates for the year are based on monthly averages.
  • **Use with caution as there are high levels of error in this estimate.
  • Source: Statistics Canada, Employment Insurance Coverage Survey, 2023.

Of the total unemployed population, 72,100 (6.4%) individuals were ineligible for EI benefits as they had invalid reasons for job separation, although they had paid EI premiums. Of these individuals, some quit their jobs to go to school while others quit for other reasons. The remaining 672,100 unemployed individuals (59.6% of total unemployed) had paid EI premiums and had a valid reason for job separation. However, some of them (10.1% of total unemployed) did not accumulate enough hours of insurable employment during their qualifying period. The rest (49.6% of total unemployed) had enough hours of insurable employment during their qualifying period and were eligible for EI regular benefits, as they had met all 3 eligibility criteria of the EI program.

While half of the unemployed population eligible for EI regular benefits with enough hours of insurable employment were receiving EI regular benefits at the time they were surveyed in 2023, some were not receiving them even though they were eligible (consult Chart 8). Among the total unemployment population:

  • 5.9% had their benefits temporarily interrupted, were waiting to receive benefits or were receiving another type of EI benefits than regular benefits
  • 9.0% did not claim or receive benefits for unknown reasons, and
  • 10.0% had received and had exhausted benefits in the past 12 months

Chart 9 shows the breakdown of the unemployed population according to their eligibility for EI regular benefits from 2011 to 2023. Compared to 2022, the share of unemployed individuals who did not pay premiums decreased by 6.8 p.p. and settled at 34.0% in 2023, at a level that is lower than pre-pandemic years. This was mainly brought by a noticeable decrease in the share of unemployed individuals who did not work in the previous 12 months or never worked (28.8% in 2023 down from 36.9% in 2022), which could be attributable to the tight labour market conditions observed right after the pandemic in 2022.

Chart 9 – Distribution of the unemployed population in terms of eligibility for Employment Insurance regular benefits, Canada, 2011 to 2023**
Chart 9: description follows
Text description for Chart 9
Category 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020* 2021 2022 2023
(A) Unemployed individuals who did not pay premiums 35.5% 38.3% 37.5% 39.0% 34.7% 34.7% 37.0% 36.1% 38.5% Not available 29.0% 40.8% 34.0%
(B) EI premium-paying unemployed individuals with an invalid reason for job separation 12.7% 13.7% 14.9% 14.9% 12.4% 11.9% 12.0% 15.8% 14.2% Not available 1.6% 4.1% 6.4%
(C) Potentially eligible unemployed individuals but with insufficient hours of insurable employment 11.2% 8.7% 6.7% 7.8% 9.1% 7.8% 8.0% 6.1% 8.3% Not available 2.9% 5.8% 10.1%
(D) Unemployed individuals eligible for EI regular benefits with enough hours of insurable employment 40.5% 39.3% 40.8% 38.3% 43.8% 45.6% 43.0% 42.1% 39.0% Not available 66.6% 49.4% 49.6%
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding.
  • * Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the data collection on EI regular benefits was suspended in the EICS 2020.
  • ** Estimates for the year are based on monthly averages.
  • Source: Statistics Canada, Employment Insurance Coverage Survey, 2011 to 2023.

Meanwhile, the share of unemployed individuals who had a valid reason for separation, but insufficient hours of insurable employment almost doubled (10.1% in 2023 compared to 5.8% in 2022). This increase was likely due to the end of the EI temporary measures in September 2022 which had temporarily lowered the number of hours of insurable employment required to qualify for regular EI benefits. Furthermore, the share of unemployed individuals who were eligible for EI regular benefits, as they had met all 3 eligibility criteria of the EI program, remained stable in 2023 and was still higher than before the pandemic.

Coverage of Employment Insurance regular benefits

The coverage rate of EI regular benefits shows the proportion of unemployed individuals who contributed to the EI program by paying EI premiums in the preceding 52 weeks prior to becoming unemployed. Thus, the coverage rate is calculated by dividing the number of unemployed individuals who had insurable employment and paid EI premiums within the previous 52 weeks by the number of total unemployed individuals in Canada. In 2023, the coverage rate was 66.0%, 6.8 p.p. higher than what was observed in 2022 (59.2%).

Higher coverage rates of EI regular benefits are usually observed during economic slowdowns, as slowing economic activities lead to layoffs that increase the share of unemployed EI contributors among all unemployed individuals. For example, the coverage rates were higher in 2015 and 2016, during the downturn in commodity prices, and in 2021 due to layoffs following the COVID-19 pandemic (consult Chart 10). The higher coverage rate in 2023 compared to 2022 (+6.8 p.p.) and to the average rate of 62.7% in 2018 and 2019 (+3.3 p.p.) can be explained by the easing of labour market conditions in 2023. This resulted in a relative higher share of unemployed individuals who had paid EI premiums among all unemployed individuals in 2023 compared to 2022 and to pre-pandemic years.

Chart 10 – Coverage rate of Employment Insurance regular benefits for the unemployed population, Canada, 2011 to 2023
Chart 10: description follows
Text description for Chart 10
Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020* 2021 2022 2023
Coverage rate of Employment Insurance regular benefits 64.5% 61.7% 62.5% 61.0% 65.3% 65.3% 63.0% 63.9% 61.5% Not available 71.0% 59.2% 66.0%
  • * Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the data collection on EI regular benefits was suspended in the EICS 2020.
  • Source: Statistics Canada, Employment Insurance Coverage Survey, 2011 to 2023.

Table 15 outlines the coverage rates of EI regular benefits in 2023 by province,Footnote 26 gender, age, and previous work patterns. Consistent to the historical pattern, the Atlantic provinces have higher coverage rates than the rest of the country. This may be explained by the composition of unemployed individuals, such as the prevalence of the seasonal employment pattern in that region.Footnote 27 Ontario continued to have the lowest coverage rate in 2023 (59.8%).

Table 15 – Employment Insurance regular benefits coverage rates for the unemployed population by province, gender, age, and previous work patterns**, Canada, 2018 to 2023*
Category 2018 2019 2021 2022 2023 Change (% points) 2022 to 2023
Newfoundland and Labrador 87.3% 77.7% 78.9% 92.5% 85.9% -6.6
Prince Edward Island 91.0% 81.8% 94.2% 100.0%E 79.9%E -20.1
Nova Scotia 73.0% 73.7% 83.9% 77.6% 77.8% +0.2
New Brunswick 69.7% 76.1% 86.5% 92.3% 84.6% -7.7
Quebec 67.0% 63.9% 76.5% 67.2% 73.4% +6.2
Ontario 59.6% 57.9% 63.8% 47.9% 59.8% +11.9
Manitoba 62.5% 59.5% 73.8% 60.3%E 60.7% +0.4
Saskatchewan 70.2% 58.0% 76.6% 69.9% 62.0% -7.9
Alberta 61.7% 61.6% 74.8% 59.5% 64.0% +4.5
British Columbia 61.7% 58.5% 72.0% 59.8% 70.1% +10.3
Men 68.3% 62.8% 71.6% 65.0% 67.7% +2.7
Women 58.1% 59.9% 70.1% 52.2% 64.2% +12.0
24 years old and under 57.1% 57.9% 54.9% 50.5% 61.9% +11.4
25 to 44 years old 64.4% 59.4% 73.2% 59.6% 66.6% +7.0
45 years old and over 67.5% 65.6% 75.9% 63.2% 68.3% +5.1
Permanent 72.1% 67.6% 82.1% 63.5% 73.3% +9.8
Full-time 74.0% 66.1% 82.7% 66.5% 74.1% +7.6
Part-time 67.1% 72.7% 82.6% 55.9% 72.4% +16.5
Non-permanent 81.1% 79.4% 83.2% 78.0% 84.2% +6.2
Seasonal*** 86.9% 88.2% 88.1% 89.6% 94.8% +5.2
Other non-standard**** 77.2% 72.8% 80.3% 71.0% 76.0% +5.0
Canada 63.9% 61.5% 71.0% 59.2% 66.0% +6.8
  • E As per the EICS release guidelines, this estimate should be used with caution.
  • * Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the data collection on EI regular benefits was suspended in the EICS 2020.
  • ** The coverage rates of unemployed individuals for most of the work pattern categories are higher than the national average. This can be explained by the 0% coverage rate of unemployed individuals for whom a previous work pattern is not applicable because they never worked before. The national average is lower because these individuals are included.
  • *** Seasonal employment is temporary work that is expected to last only until the end of a ‘season'—the period for which services are in demand.
  • **** Other non-standard refers to non-permanent paid jobs that were either temporary, term, contractual, casual or other non-permanent (but not seasonal) employment. This excludes unemployed individuals who were self-employed.
  • Source: Statistics Canada, Employment Insurance Coverage Survey, 2018 to 2023.

Consistent with trend in previous years, the coverage rate for men was higher than that for women in 2023. The lower coverage rate for women can be explained by the fact that unemployed women are less likely to have recent insurable employment compared to unemployed men. The coverage rate of younger unemployed individuals was still the lowest and the coverage rate for those aged 45 years and older remained the highest in 2023.

When the unemployed population is categorized by their previous work patterns, results show that a higher share of unemployed individuals with previous non-permanent jobs paid EI premiums in the previous 52 weeks than those who had permanent jobs. This can be explained by the higher coverage rate of unemployed individuals who worked in non-permanent seasonal jobs. As these individuals work for a few weeks or months on a cyclical pattern over a year, they are more likely to have paid EI premiums in the previous 52 weeks than those who were in permanent jobs and might be unemployed for more than a year. Among unemployed individuals who previously held permanent jobs, the coverage rate in 2023 for those who had part-time jobs was slightly lower than the one for those who had full-time jobs. Among unemployed individuals who previously were in non-permanent employment, those who had seasonal work had a significantly higher coverage rate in 2023 compared to those who had non-seasonal non-standard work, consistent to historical trend.

Eligibility for Employment Insurance regular benefits

As mentioned at the beginning of this subsection, claimants for EI regular benefits must meet 3 criteria to be considered eligible (they must have paid EI premiums, have a valid reason for job separation, and have accumulated the required hours of insurable employment during their qualifying period). The eligibility rate is expressed as the share of unemployed individuals with sufficient hours of insurable employment among those who meet the other 2 eligibility criteria.

As illustrated by the "all unemployed individuals" line in Chart 11, the eligibility rate for EI regular benefits in Canada has ranged from 78.4% to 87.4% in the past decade. The rate for 2023 stood at 83.1%, slightly higher than its pre-pandemic level of 82.4% observed in 2019. The comparable eligibility rate between 2019 and 2023 can be partly attributed to similar national unemployment rates in both years (5.7% in 2019 and 5.4% in 2023),Footnote 28 which translated into relatively similar entrance requirements for EI regular benefits at the national level for those years. The eligibility rate for unemployed individuals who previously had permanent employment has historically been higher than the one of those who had non-permanent employment.

Chart 11 – Eligibility rate for Employment Insurance regular benefits for the unemployed population by previous employment characteristics, Canada, 2011 to 2023
Chart 11: description follows
Text description for Chart 11
Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020* 2021** 2022** 2023
Eligibility rate for all unemployed individuals 78.4% 81.9% 85.8% 83.1% 82.8% 85.4% 84.3% 87.4% 82.4% Not available Not available Not available 83.1%
Eligibility rate for unemployed individuals who were in permanent employment 87.2% 89.9% 91.4% 87.7% 90.0% 92.8% 91.7% 92.8% 89.3% Not available Not available Not available 86.8%
Eligibility rate for unemployed individuals who were in non-permanent employment 68.3% 72.2% 79.0% 77.7% 72.2% 75.7% 76.7% 80.0% 74.4% Not available Not available Not available 78.3%
  • * Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the data collection on EI regular benefits was suspended in the EICS 2020.
  • ** Due to the EI temporary measures related to the COVID‑19 pandemic in place from September 2020 to September 2022, eligibility rates for 2021 and 2022 were incomparable to the other years.
  • Source: Statistics Canada, Employment Insurance Coverage Survey, 2011 to 2023.

The eligibility rates for EI regular benefits are sensitive to economic conditions and specific employment patterns during the qualifying period, such as the incidence of full-time versus part-time employment, and permanent versus temporary employment. Because of this, significant variations are found when unemployed individuals are classified based on regional, demographic and previous employment characteristics.

As outlined in Table 16, unemployed individuals in Alberta, Ontario and Saskatchewan had slightly lower eligibility rates compared to the national average in 2023. In comparison, those in the Atlantic provinces had generally higher eligibility rates.

Table 16 – Employment Insurance regular benefits eligibility rates for the unemployed population by province, gender, age, and previous work patterns, Canada, 2016 to 2023*
Category 2016 2017 2018 2019 2023 Change (% points) 2019 to 2023
Newfoundland and Labrador 95.9% 96.7% 93.8% 94.1% 95.6% +1.5
Prince Edward Island 98.5% 94.3% 98.2% 97.0% 96.1%E -0.9
Nova Scotia 93.3% 86.0% 93.8% 95.2% 91.7% -3.5
New Brunswick 94.6% 93.1% 94.0% 96.7% 87.6% -9.1
Quebec 86.7% 85.1% 85.5% 87.8% 87.3% -0.5
Ontario 81.3% 79.6% 88.7% 75.7% 80.1% +4.4
Manitoba 75.3% 84.9% 83.1% 79.1%E 87.3% +8.2
Saskatchewan 78.9% 69.7% 86.6% 83.2% 80.5% -2.7
Alberta 84.9% 85.2% 79.6% 84.1% 74.7% -9.4
British Columbia 87.3% 90.0% 91.0% 73.6% 86.7% +13.1
Men 87.2% 85.8% 88.3% 84.7% 88.6% +3.9
Women 81.6% 82.1% 86.1% 79.5% 76.4% -3.1
24 years old and under 50.8% 40.7% 60.5% 51.7% 57.1% +5.4
25 to 44 years old 88.4% 89.4% 90.7% 82.1% 83.5% +1.4
45 years old and over 94.0% 90.2% 90.5% 91.4% 95.1% +3.7
Permanent 92.8% 91.7% 92.8% 89.3% 86.8% -2.5
Full-time 95.3% 94.5% 93.6% 94.2% 95.4% +1.2
Part-time 62.4% 69.3% 86.0%E 64.7% 40.4%E -24.3
Non-permanent 75.7% 76.7% 80.1% 74.4% 78.2% +3.8
Seasonal** 87.5% 86.7% 82.0% 83.5% 80.7% -2.8
Other non-standard*** 66.4% 66.8% 78.5% 64.5% 76.0% +11.5
Canada 85.4% 84.3% 87.4% 82.4% 83.1% +0.7
  • E As per the EICS release guidelines, this estimate should be used with caution.
  • * Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the data collection on EI regular benefits was suspended in the EICS 2020. Due to the EI temporary measures related to the COVID‑19 pandemic in place from September 2020 to September 2022, eligibility rates for 2021 and 2022 were incomparable to the other years.
  • ** Seasonal employment is temporary work that is expected to last only until the end of a ‘season'—the period for which services are in demand.
  • *** Other non-standard refers to non-permanent paid jobs that were either temporary, term, contractual, casual or other non-permanent (but not seasonal) employment. This excludes unemployed individuals who were self-employed.
  • Source: Statistics Canada, Employment Insurance Coverage Survey, 2016 to 2023.

Consistent to previous years, unemployed men registered higher eligibility rates than unemployed women in 2023, probably due to the fact that a higher proportion of men hold full-time jobs or permanent jobs or both, while a higher proportion of women work in part-time jobs or temporary jobs or both. This means that unemployed women are less likely to accumulate sufficient hours of insurable employment. By age, unemployed youth aged 24 years and under continued to have the lowest eligibility rate in 2023, compared to unemployed individuals aged between 25 and 44 years and those aged 45 years and over.

Additionally, unemployed individuals who had part-time or non-permanent employment were less likely to accumulate the required number of hours of insurable employment in 2023 due to their work pattern, resulting in lower eligibility rate compared to the national average.

Alternative method using EI administrative data to estimate eligibility for EI regular benefits

The eligibility for EI regular benefits can also be estimated by using Record of Employment (ROE)* data. In this case, the eligibility rate is expressed as the share of job separators** who met the required number of hours of insurable employment in their qualifying period (previous 52 weeks or since the establishment of their last EI claim, whichever is shorter) to qualify for EI regular benefits among those who had a job separation with a valid reason for job separation. The calculation of eligibility rates relies on EI administrative data such as ROEs and Status Vector (STVC) data.***

This alternative methodology was used to report eligibility rates in the EI Monitoring and Assessment reports 2020‑21 to 2022‑23. EICS‑based eligibility rates could not be reported in these reports because the EICS 2020 did not collect any information on EI regular benefits and the EICS 2021 and 2022 did not fully adapt to the changes in eligibility criteria to qualify for EI regular benefits due to the COVID‑19 pandemic and the subsequent EI temporary measures.

Given that the EI temporary measures ended on September 24, 2022, and original EI rules resumed, the ROE‑based eligibility rate for 2023‑24 can be compared to that for 2018‑19, 2019‑20 and the second half of 2022‑23, when the same original EI rules were in effect.

Based on EI administration data, 61.1% job separators had sufficient hours of insurable employment to qualify for EI regular benefits in 2023‑24. This was higher than the levels observed in the second half of 2022‑23 (57.0%) and in pre‑pandemic years (48.3% in 2019‑20 and 52.5% in 2018‑19).

Results from this alternative methodology are not comparable to those of the EICS‑based eligibility. The alternative methodology examines eligibility among a different population, as job separators are not necessarily unemployed. Results from a previous departmental study also found that the alternative methodology may not fully reflect potential eligibility where previous employment did not result in a ROE.

  • * A record of employment (ROE) is a form completed by the employer when an employee stops working. It contains information on employment history, such as hours of insurable employment from the past year.
  • ** Job separators are defined as individuals who have at least one incidence of job separation during the reference period.
  • *** The STVC file contains key information about the EI program and the flow of EI claims and payments, from the time the claim is filed to the time the benefits expire. Results for 2023‑24 are based on 100% of ROE and STVC data from August 2024. Results for pre‑pandemic fiscal years and 2022‑23 are based on a 10% random sample of ROE data and 100% of STVC data from August 2024.

Eligibility for Employment Insurance regular benefits during natural disasters

A recent departmental study* assessing the effectiveness of the EI program in supporting workers affected by natural disasters examined EI eligibility and usage during selected natural disaster events during the 2015-2019 and 2023 periods. The study found that workers laid off due to natural disaster events were more likely to accumulate sufficient hours of insurable employment to qualify for EI regular benefits than those who were laid off during non-disaster periods. This may be attributed to the fact that natural disasters often affect individuals with a stronger attachment to the labour market-those who would likely have remained employed if not for the disruptions caused by the disasters-resulting in a higher average eligibility rate.

Additionally, the study found that during natural disaster periods, both the EI take-up rate** and maximum entitlement increased. However, the average number of weeks of EI regular benefits actually used was lower, leading to a reduced proportion of entitlement weeks used. These trends further suggest that natural disasters impact many individuals with a strong labour market attachment.

  • *ESDC, Employment Insurance during "Non-Economic Crises" (Ottawa: ESDC, Employment Insurance Policy Directorate, 2025).
  • ** EI take-up rate is defined as the proportion of individuals with valid reasons for separation and sufficient hours of insurable employment who actually established an EI regular claim.

Access to Employment Insurance regular benefits

Access to EI regular benefits is another way to measure how the EI program is providing financial support to Canada's unemployed individuals following a job loss and helping them transition to new employment. For the purpose of the EI Monitoring and Assessment Report, access to EI regular benefits is measured by 2 rates: the Beneficiary-to-Unemployed (B/U) rate and the Beneficiary-to-Unemployed Contributor (B/UC) rate.

The rates' numerator (B) and denominators (U and UC) are both obtained from the EICS. The number of unemployed individuals who received EI regular benefits (B) includes those who received EI regular benefits at the time they were surveyed (including those who had their benefits temporarily interrupted or waiting to receive benefits) as well as those who received but exhausted their EI regular benefits within 12 months of the time they were surveyed to incorporate all beneficiaries in the year.

The Beneficiary-to-Unemployed (B/U) rate is the share of unemployed individuals who received EI regular benefits among all unemployed individuals. As such, it includes a significant segment of the unemployed population who are ineligible for EI regular benefits (such as those who did not work in the previous year or never worked, who did not have a valid job separation, and those who were self-employed). As a result, the B/U rate is sensitive to changes in the composition of the unemployed population and the proportion of the unemployed individuals outside the scope of the EI program's coverage.

The Beneficiary-to-Unemployed Contributor (B/UC) rate is the share of unemployed individuals who received EI regular benefits among the unemployed individuals who contributed EI premiums in the previous 12 months. The B/UC rate measures accessibility among unemployed individuals for whom EI regular benefits are designed to provide coverage and excludes those who did not contribute EI premiums during their last employment period or did not have any labour force attachment. As a result, this rate provides a better assessment of accessibility to EI regular benefits.

Change in methodology to report on access to Employment Insurance regular benefits

In previous years' reports, access to EI regular benefits was measured by the B/U and B/UC ratios. Those ratios were based on 2 data sources: average number of beneficiaries of EI regular benefits reported in Statistics Canada's monthly EI Statistics (B) and the number of unemployed individuals (U) and unemployed contributors (UC) obtained from the EICS. Given that the ratios' numerator and denominator came from 2 different data sources, it could create incoherent results. For example, no ratios were reported for 2021 for this reason. Starting with this year's report, the B/U and B/UC rates (not ratios) are reported as measures of access to EI regular benefits. The rates' numerator and denominator are both obtained from the EICS.

The results of B/C and B/UC rates are not comparable to those of the ratios released in previous EI Monitoring and Assessment reports. For trend analysis purposes, the new B/U and B/UC rates are calculated retroactively using historical EICS data dating back to 2011.

Chart 12 illustrates the B/U and B/UC rates over the 2011-2023 period. In 2023, the B/U rate was 39.9%, 2.3 p.p. lower than that in 2022. In the meantime, the B/UC rate was 60.4% in 2023, down from 71.3% in 2022, representing a 10.8 p.p. drop. The lower share of unemployed individuals who received EI regular benefits among the total unemployed individuals and unemployed individuals who paid EI premiums in 2023 compared to 2022 could be partially due to the end of the EI temporary measures in September 2022 that facilitated access to EI benefits. In addition, the larger drop in the B/UC rate than the B/U rate in 2023 could be explained by the number of unemployed individuals who paid EI premiums that outpaced the total number of unemployed individuals over the period due to the tight labour market conditions observed right after the COVID-19 pandemic in 2022. Compared to the pre-pandemic years, both B/U and B/UC rates were higher in 2023 than in 2018 and 2019.

Chart 12 – Employment Insurance regular benefits access rates, Canada, 2011 to 2023
Chart 12: description follows
Text description for Chart 12
Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020* 2021 2022 2023
B/U rate 37.6% 34.7% 37.2% 33.9% 40.0% 41.7% 37.9% 37.1% 34.7% Not available 62.3% 42.2% 39.9%
B/UC rate 58.3% 56.2% 59.6% 55.6% 61.3% 63.8% 60.1% 58.0% 56.4% Not available 87.7% 71.3% 60.4%
  • * Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the data collection on EI regular benefits was suspended in the EICS 2020.
  • Source: Statistics Canada, Employment Insurance Coverage Survey, 2011 to 2023.

2.2.3 Level of Employment Insurance regular benefits

The weekly benefit rate to which EI claimants are entitled is subject to the Variable Best Weeks (VBW) provision. Under this provision, the weekly benefit rate that eligible claimants are entitled to receive is calculated as 55% of the average of their highest (best) weeks of insurable earnings during their qualifying period, up to the maximum weekly benefit rate.Footnote 29 The number of weeks used to calculate the weekly benefit rate ranges from 14 to 22, depending on the monthly regional unemployment rate of the claimant's EI economic region at the time their claim is established (consult subsection 2.1.1 for the VBW table).

Claimants with children (under 18 years old) and low annual family income may be eligible to receive the Family Supplement. This provision can increase eligible claimants' benefit rate from 55% up to a maximum of 80% of their weekly insurable earnings, subject to the maximum weekly benefit rate (consult subsection 2.1.1 for additional details). The weekly benefit rates presented in this subsection include the Family Supplement amounts paid to eligible claimants, if applicable.

Table 17 outlines the average weekly benefit rates for EI regular claims by province and territory in 2023‑24. Regular claims established during the fiscal year had an average weekly benefit rate of $561, up from $535 in 2022‑23 (+4.9%). Similar to previous years, regular claims established in the Territories received, on average, the highest weekly benefit rate in 2023‑24. Conversely, regular claims from the Atlantic provinces and Manitoba had, on average, the lowest weekly benefit rate during the reporting period. The average weekly regular benefit rate increased in all jurisdictions in 2023‑24 compared to 2022‑23, ranging from 2.6% in Northwest Territories to 6.1% in British Columbia. This was consistent with the growth in average nominal weekly earnings by jurisdiction over the same period (consult Chapter 1).

Table 17 – Average weekly benefit rate for Employment Insurance regular claims by province or territory, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Province or territory 2022‑23 2023‑24 Change (%)
Newfoundland and Labrador $510 $537 +5.4%
Prince Edward Island $499 $524 +4.9%
Nova Scotia $491 $519 +5.9%
New Brunswick $517 $540 +4.6%
Quebec $544 $567 +4.3%
Ontario $538 $563 +4.6%
Manitoba $500 $525 +4.9%
Saskatchewan $525 $550 +4.7%
Alberta $551 $577 +4.8%
British Columbia $543 $576 +6.1%
Yukon $597 $615 +3.0%
Northwest Territories $583 $598 +2.6%
Nunavut $579 $603 +4.3%
Canada $535 $561 +4.9%
  • Note: Percentage change is based on unrounded numbers. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.5.3 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

In terms of gender, men had a higher average weekly regular benefit rate ($588) than women ($522) in 2023‑24 (consult Annex 2.5.3). Historically, this has also been the case. Proportionally, the average weekly regular benefit rate for women represents 88.8% of the average rate for men in 2023‑24, which remained similar to the ratio before the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the growth in the average weekly regular benefit rate for women surpassed that for men in 2023‑24 compared to 2022‑23 (+5.6% and +4.2%, respectively).

Furthermore, men had a higher average weekly regular benefit rate than women in all categories of hours of insurable employment worked during their qualifying period. This gender gap is more apparent at lower levels of labour market attachment, as categorized by the number of hours of insurable employment. As illustrated in Chart 13, the average weekly regular benefit rate for women who had 420 to 559 hours of insurable employment during their qualifying period was 80.1% of the average rate for men in 2023‑24. At the other end, for those who had 1,820 or more hours of insurable employment, that ratio was 94.6%.

Chart 13 – Average weekly benefit rate for Employment Insurance regular claims by gender and hours of insurable employment, Canada, 2023‑24
Chart 13: description follows
Text description for Chart 13
Hours of insurable employment Men's average weekly benefit rate Women's average weekly benefit rate
420 to 559 $427 $342
560 to 699 $478 $394
700 to 839 $491 $404
840 to 979 $528 $445
980 to 1,119 $555 $468
1,120 to 1,259 $574 $494
1,260 to 1,399 $590 $523
1,400 to 1,539 $602 $562
1,540 to 1,679 $609 $562
1,680 to 1,819 $615 $572
1,820 or more $630 $596
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Table 18 outlines the average weekly benefit rate for EI regular claims by age group for men and women in 2023‑24. Overall, in terms of age group, claimants aged 25 to 44 years had the highest average weekly benefit rate during the reporting period, while those aged 24 years and under received the lowest average weekly benefit rate. When categorizing claimants by both age group and gender, on average, men aged between 45 and 54 years had the highest weekly benefit rate ($606), while for women, those who were aged between 25 and 44 years received the highest weekly benefit rate ($541). Moreover, the gap between men and women was highest for claimants aged between 45 and 54 years, as men received, on average, $77 more in weekly regular benefits than women.

Table 18 – Average weekly benefit rate for Employment Insurance regular claims by age group and gender, Canada, 2023‑24
Age category Men Women All claimants
24 years old and under $537 $465 $515
25 to 44 years old $601 $541 $577
45 to 54 years old $606 $529 $570
55 years old and over $572 $497 $542
Canada $588 $522 $561
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

In terms of claimant category, long-tenured workers received the highest average weekly regular benefit rate ($601) in 2023‑24, while occasional claimants had the lowest ($543) (consult Table 19). Compared to the previous year, all claimant categories experienced an increase of their average weekly regular benefit rate in 2023‑24, with occasional claimants having the highest growth.

Table 19 – Average weekly benefit rate for Employment Insurance regular claims by EI claimant category, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Claimant category 2022‑23 2023‑24 Change (%)
Long-tenured workers $583 $601 +3.1%
Occasional claimants $512 $543 +6.0%
Frequent claimants $547 $567 +3.7%
Canada $535 $561 +4.9%
  • Note: Percentage change is based on unrounded numbers. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.5.3 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

Table 20 outlines the share of claims established for EI regular benefits that receive the maximum weekly benefit rate. In 2023‑24, 48.8% of claims received the maximum weekly benefit rate, a proportion higher than the one observed in 2022‑23 (45.4%) and similar to the years preceding the COVID-19 pandemic (49.1% in 2018‑19 and 49.0% in 2019‑20). The share of regular claims receiving the maximum weekly benefit rate in 2023‑24 was higher in the Territories, and lower in the Atlantic provinces and Manitoba. This is consistent with the results of the average weekly regular benefit rate by jurisdiction.

Table 20 – Share of Employment Insurance regular claims receiving the maximum weekly benefit rate by province or territory, gender, age and claimant category, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category 2022‑23 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 40.4% 44.8%
Prince Edward Island 28.9% 31.2%
Nova Scotia 33.3% 36.5%
New Brunswick 36.9% 34.7%
Quebec 48.6% 50.6%
Ontario 44.4% 48.3%
Manitoba 34.3% 36.7%
Saskatchewan 45.2% 47.5%
Alberta 53.9% 58.7%
British Columbia 47.0% 53.0%
Yukon 71.0% 72.4%
Northwest Territories 63.9% 67.6%
Nunavut 67.5% 72.2%
Men 56.9% 60.1%
Women 28.8% 31.5%
24 years old and under 27.2% 31.5%
25 to 44 years old 50.6% 54.3%
45 to 54 years old 48.3% 51.4%
55 years old and over 40.6% 43.0%
Long-tenured workers 61.5% 64.2%
Occasional claimants 37.7% 42.0%
Frequent claimants 49.4% 50.7%
Canada 45.4% 48.8%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

In line with previous years, the share of regular claims receiving the maximum weekly benefit rate established by men (60.1%) was significantly higher than those established by women (31.5%) in 2023‑24. This is partly attributable to the fact that a higher proportion of women work in part-time jobs than men, resulting in generally lower average weekly insurable earnings for them.

By age group, claimants aged between 25 and 44 years had the highest share of regular claims receiving the maximum weekly benefit rate (54.3%) in 2023‑24, while claimants aged 24 and under had the lowest share (31.5%). In terms of claimant category, long-tenured workers had the highest share of regular claims receiving the maximum weekly benefit rate (64.2%), while occasional claimants had the lowest (42.0%).

As outlined in Table 21, 71.8% of regular claims established in 2023‑24 had a weekly benefit rate of $501 or more in 2023‑24. On the other hand, 24.5% of claims received between $301 and $500 weekly, and 3.7% received $300 or less.

Table 21 – Share of Employment Insurance regular claims by weekly benefit rate grouping, Canada, 2023‑24
Category 2023‑24
$300 and under 3.7%
$301 to $500 24.5%
$501 and over 71.8%
Canada 100.0%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

2.2.4 Employment Insurance regular benefit entitlement

This subsection presents detailed analysis on the duration of EI regular benefits, both maximum entitlement and actual weeks used. Statistics presented in this subsection are based on claims that were completedFootnote 30 during the fiscal year. Statistics for the reporting fiscal year are preliminary estimates and are subject to revision in the future.

Claimants who have successfully established a claim for EI regular benefits are entitled to a maximum number of weeks of regular benefits they may receive, known as their entitlement. This entitlement ranges between 14 and 45 weeks and is determined by the number of hours of insurable employment accumulated by claimants during their qualifying periodFootnote 31 and the effective unemployment rate in the EI economic region where they live at the time the claim is established (consult Annex 2.2 for the entitlement table).

The EI program is designed to respond automatically to changes in economic conditions that affect local labour markets. The number of hours of insurable employment needed to qualify for EI regular benefits (420 to 700 hours) and the maximum number of weeks payable (14 to 45 weeks) vary depending on the monthly unemployment rate in the EI economic region in which the individual lives. When an EI region's unemployment rate changes, the entrance requirement and the maximum number of weeks of EI regular benefits claimants are entitled to receive adjust in response.Footnote 32

The number of weeks of benefits that an EI claimant actually receives during a claim (defined as the actual duration of a claim) is usually lower than the maximum entitlement. This is usually due to circumstances such as:

  • the claimant has found work and is no longer unemployed
  • the claimant has switched to EI special benefits, or
  • the claimant was disentitled from receiving regular benefits because they were not available for work during their claimFootnote 33

Claimants receive different levels of entitlement. In order to compare the duration of EI regular benefits regardless of their entitlement, the proportion of weeks of EI regular benefits used by claimants is also examined. This proportion is defined as the number of weeks of EI regular benefits used by claimants as a share of their maximum entitlement.

Duration of Employment Insurance regular benefits

As illustrated in Chart 14, the average maximum entitlement of completed EI regular claims was 28.5 weeks in 2023‑24. This was similar to 28.0 weeks recorded for claims completed in 2022‑23 that were established on or after September 26, 2021. These latter claims were established when the maximum entitlement returned to the pre‑pandemic range of between 14 to 45 weeks. For simplicity, for the rest of the subsection, they are referred to as claims completed in 2022‑23. The average actual duration, on the other hand, was 16.7 weeks for claims completed in 2023‑24, virtually unchanged from 16.8 weeks for claims completed in 2022‑23. Both durations in 2023‑24 were lower than the ones observed before the pandemic (average maximum entitlement of 30.0 weeks and average actual duration of 18.3 weeks over the period of 2018‑19 to 2019‑20). This is attributable in part to the relatively low unemployment rate observed in 2023‑24 compared to before the pandemic.

Chart 14 – Average maximum entitlement and actual duration of completed claims for Employment Insurance regular benefits and unemployment rate, Canada, 2014‑15 to 2023‑24
Chart 14: description follows
Text description for Chart 14
Year 2014‑15 2015‑16* 2016‑17* 2017‑18* 2018‑19 2019‑20 2020‑21** 2021‑22*** 2022‑23**** 2023‑24****
Average maximum entitlement 31.6 32.1 33.7 32.6 30.3 29.7 31.1 Not comparable 28.0R 28.5P
Average actual duration 19.4 19.3 20.7 20.3 18.5 18.2 21.1 Not comparable 16.8R 16.7P
Unemployment rate 6.9% 7.1% 6.9% 6.2% 5.8% 5.9% 10.2% 6.8% 5.1% 5.6%
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • *A temporary measure extended the number of weeks of EI regular benefits for claimants in 15 EI economic regions that were hit the hardest by the downturn in commodity prices during this period.
  • **Includes claims established before March 15, 2020 and completed in 2020‑21.
  • ***Most claims completed in 2021‑22 were entitled 50 weeks of EI regular benefits, therefore their average actual duration is not comparable with the other fiscal years.
  • ****Includes claims established on or after September 26, 2021 and completed in 2022‑23 or 2023‑24.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Sources: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2014‑15 to 2020‑21 and 100% of data for 2022‑23 and 2023‑24 (for average maximum entitlement and average actual duration). Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, Table 14-10-0287-01 (for data on unemployment rates).

The average proportion of EI regular benefit weeks used by completed claims in 2023‑24 was 62.0%. This was lower than the proportion recorded by completed claims in 2022‑23 (64.1%), as well as claims completed before the pandemic (63.7% in 2018‑19 and 64.1% in 2019‑20).

Declining Employment Insurance regional unemployment rates and maximum entitlement

In recent years, the EI unemployment rates in several EI economic regions in Canada have declined and reached historic lows. As a result, individuals in these regions may find it challenging to qualify for EI regular benefits due to higher entrance requirements, and when they do, they may be entitled to less weeks of regular benefits, which could lead to higher entitlement exhaustion rate.

A recent departmental study* examined the impact of declining EI regional unemployment rates and the degree to which long-standing employment patterns adapted to the changing EI entrance requirements and lower maximum entitlement. The study identified 15 EI economic regions affected by declining unemployment rates. Between September 25, 2022 and August 26, 2023 (referred to as 2022‑23 in the study), these regions had an unemployment rate at least 1 percentage point (p.p.) lower than their minimum unemployment rate observed from 2015 to 2017.** When comparing non-seasonal regular claims established in 2022‑23 in the affected EI regions to their counterparts established from 2015 to 2017, the unemployment rate and the maximum entitlement fell by 4.1 p.p. and 5.4 weeks on average, respectively.

After controlling for demographic factors and industries, results showed that the decline in regional unemployment rates did not cause a significant increase in the proportion EI regular benefit weeks used by claimants in the affected regions in 2022‑23 (for both seasonal and non-seasonal claims). Inversely, the study found a significant increase in the likelihood of exhausting regular benefits for non-seasonal claims in the affected regions due to the decline in regional unemployment rates (but no significant impact for seasonal claims).

Although claimants were impacted by the decline in regional unemployment rates, there appeared to be little to no behavioral change in response to the regional unemployment rate decline for both seasonal and non-seasonal claims in the affected regions.

  • * ESDC, Declining unemployment rate in high unemployment rate regions (Ottawa: ESDC, Evaluation Directorate, 2025).
  • ** EI economic regions where the unemployment rate declined but did not fall below 16.1%, or began below 6.1%, were not considered as affected regions.

Duration of Employment Insurance regular claims by province or territory, gender, age, claimant category and industry

The duration of EI regular claims completed in 2023‑24 varied significantly across provinces and territories, reflecting differences in regional labour market and labour market characteristics in 2023‑24, as outlined in Table 22. EI regular claims established in Newfoundland and Labrador and Nunavut had the highest average maximum entitlement (36.7 weeks and 37.5 weeks, respectively). These significantly higher maximum entitlements compared to the national average can be explained in part by the high unemployment rates observed in these jurisdictions (the unemployment rate was 9.8% in Newfoundland and Labrador and 12.7% in Nunavut in 2023‑24).Footnote 34 These 2 jurisdictions also had the highest average actual duration (26.1 weeks and 26.6 weeks, respectively) and among the highest average proportion of regular benefit weeks used (73.1% and 71.7%, respectively) (consult Table 23 for proportions of EI regular benefit weeks used). In comparison, among provinces, EI regular claims established in British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec had the lowest average maximum entitlement (from 27.3 weeks to 27.5 weeks) corresponding to the low unemployment rates generally observed in these provinces. Claims established in Quebec (14.4 weeks), Ontario (15.8 weeks) and British Columbia (16.3 weeks) also registered the lowest average actual duration among all provinces in 2023‑24. This resulted in a relatively low average proportion of EI regular benefit weeks used in these provinces.

Table 22 – Average maximum entitlement and average actual durations of completed claims for Employment Insurance regular benefits, by province or territory, gender, age and claimant category, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24*
Category Average maximum entitlement (weeks) 2022‑23 Average maximum entitlement (weeks) 2023‑24P Change in average maximum entitlement (%) Average actual duration (weeks) 2022‑23R Average actual duration (weeks) 2023‑24P Change in average actual duration (%)
Newfoundland and Labrador 38.0 36.7 -3.5% 26.4 26.1 -1.3%
Prince Edward Island 32.6R 31.2 -4.5% 22.2 21.3 -3.8%
Nova Scotia 31.0 30.6 -1.1% 21.3 21.1 -1.0%
New Brunswick 32.5R 30.9 -4.8% 21.9 21.6 -1.2%
Quebec 26.6R 27.5 +3.3% 14.6 14.4 -1.3%
Ontario 26.7R 27.4 +2.8% 15.7 15.8 +0.9%
Manitoba 27.8R 28.6 +3.0% 17.2 17.4 +1.3%
Saskatchewan 30.6R 30.6 0.0% 19.0 19.0 +0.2%
Alberta 28.9R 28.9 -0.1% 17.4 16.9 -2.8%
British Columbia 25.6 27.3 +6.5% 15.4 16.3 +5.5%
Yukon 26.9R 27.5 +2.3% 17.9 17.9 +0.3%
Northwest Territories 23.5R 30.5 +29.6% 17.2 15.4 -10.5%
Nunavut 37.5 37.5 +0.1% 23.2 26.6 +14.9%
Men 28.9 29.2 +1.1% 17.1 17.1 -0.2%
Women 26.6 27.3 +2.5% 16.3 16.1 -1.1%
24 years old and under 25.9 26.8 +3.6% 14.7 15.0 +2.4%
25 to 44 years old 28.2 28.7 +2.0% 15.7 15.9 +0.8%
45 to 54 years old 29.0 29.1 +0.6% 17.0 16.7 -1.8%
55 years old and over 27.8 28.0 +0.6% 19.2 18.9 -1.7%
Long-tenured workers 31.7 31.4 -0.9% 14.6 14.1 -3.5%
Occasional claimants 26.3 27.4 +4.2% 15.9 16.3 +2.7%
Frequent claimants 28.9 28.2 -2.7% 20.9 20.6 -1.7%
Canada 28.0 28.5 +1.6% 16.8 16.7 -0.6%
  • Note: Percentage changes are based on unrounded numbers. Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Includes claims established on or after September 26, 2021 and completed in 2022‑23 or 2023‑24.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Consult Annex 2.5 for more details on average actual duration.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.
Table 23 – Proportion of Employment Insurance regular benefits' weeks used, by province or territory, gender, age and claimant category, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24*
Category 2022‑23R 2023‑24P Change (% points)
Newfoundland and Labrador 71.3% 73.1% +1.8
Prince Edward Island 70.8% 71.6% +0.8
Nova Scotia 72.0% 71.9% -0.2
New Brunswick 70.6% 73.2% +2.6
Quebec 60.8% 57.4% -3.5
Ontario 62.9% 60.7% -2.2
Manitoba 65.7% 63.4% -2.3
Saskatchewan 65.8% 65.0% -0.8
Alberta 64.0% 61.7% -2.3
British Columbia 64.8% 62.8% -2.0
Yukon 71.5% 68.9% -2.7
Northwest Territories 78.0% 55.4% -22.6
Nunavut 64.1% 71.7% +7.6
Men 64.0% 62.5% -1.5
Women 64.2% 61.1% -3.1
24 years old and under 60.8% 59.7% -1.1
25 to 44 years old 60.1% 58.5% -1.6
45 to 54 years old 62.5% 60.2% -2.3
55 years old and over 72.9% 70.5% -2.4
Long-tenured workers 48.6% 46.8% -1.7
Occasional claimants 64.6% 62.6% -2.0
Frequent claimants 76.2% 76.4% +0.2
Canada 64.1% 62.0% -2.1
  • Note: Changes in percentage points are based on unrounded numbers. Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Includes claims established on or after September 26, 2021 and completed in 2022‑23 or 2023‑24.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Source:  Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

The average maximum entitlement of EI regular claims completed in 2023‑24 was lower for women (27.3 weeks) than men (29.2 weeks) partly because they are more likely to work in part-time jobs and to accumulate less hours of insurable employment. Women also used on average less weeks of regular benefits compared to men in 2023‑24 (16.1 weeks and 17.1 weeks, respectively). In terms of proportion, women used on average a slightly lower share of their entitlement of regular benefits than men in 2023‑24 (61.1% for women compared to 62.5% for men).

In terms of age groups, claimants aged 24 and under had the lowest average maximum entitlement (26.8 weeks) and the lowest average actual duration (15.0 weeks) of EI regular claims completed in 2023‑24. In comparison, claimants aged 55 and over used, on average, the highest number of weeks of regular benefits (18.9 weeks) and the highest proportion of their entitlement of regular benefits (70.5%) in 2023‑24.

With regard to claimant categories, long-tenured workers generally have higher maximum entitlements than occasional and frequent claimants, as they are more likely to accumulate hours of insurable employment well above the minimum requirements for EI regular benefits. This was true for completed claims in 2023‑24 (31.4 weeks, 27.4 weeks and 28.2 weeks, respectively). On average, occasional and frequent claimants used more weeks of EI regular benefits than long-tenured workers. This was reflected in their average proportion of regular benefit weeks used, as frequent (76.4%) and occasional (62.6%) claimants used proportionally more weeks of regular benefits than long-tenured workers (46.8%) in 2023‑24. This discrepancy between categories of claimants can be explained by the fact that long‑tenured workers generally have stronger labour market attachment, tend to have more weeks of entitlement to regular benefits, and collect fewer weeks of benefits. As such, they use a lower proportion of their benefit weeks.

In terms of industry breakdown, EI regular claims completed in 2023‑24 with the highest average actual durations were from Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting (20.4 weeks), Finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing (19.6 weeks), and Wholesale and retail trade (19.3 weeks). These industries also used a higher share of their entitlement of regular benefits on average than the national level (75.4%, 69.0% and 69.4%, respectively). Conversely, claims established by claimants from the Educational services industry had the lowest average actual duration (10.6 weeks) and the lowest average proportion of regular benefit weeks used (44.1%) due to the seasonal nature of this sector and the relatively short and well‑defined "off-season" over the summer months (consult Annex 2.6.2).

Similar to the national level, the average actual duration of EI regular claims completed in 2023‑24 stayed relatively unchanged in almost all provinces and territories, genders, age groups, claimant categories and industries compared to 2022‑23. However, there were some exceptions in the Northwest Territories (‑1.8 weeks or ‑10.5%), Nunavut (+3.4 weeks or +14.9%) and the Professional, scientific and technical services industry (+1.8 weeks or +10.0%).

Proportion of Employment Insurance regular benefit weeks used by weeks of entitlement, EI regional unemployment rate and working while on claim status

As with the duration of EI regular benefits, a few factors may influence the proportion of entitlement used by claimants; for instance, the number of hours of insurable employment, the EI regional unemployment rates and working while on claim.

Claimants with a greater number of hours of insurable employment and those residing in EI regions with lower unemployment rates are more likely to find employment following a job separation before they exhaust their weeks of EI benefits. Therefore, they use a lower proportion of their maximum entitlement for EI regular benefits.

As shown in Table 24, on average for EI regular claims completed in 2023‑24, claimants with the lowest number of EI entitlement weeks (between 14 and 19 weeks) used 81.8% of their entitlement compared to claimants with the highest number of weeks of entitlement (45 weeks) who only used 48.5% of their entitlement.

Table 24 – Proportion of Employment Insurance regular benefits' weeks used by weeks of entitlement, EI regional unemployment rate and working while on claim status, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24*
Category 2022‑23R 2023‑24P Change (% points)
Between 14 and 19 weeks of entitlement for EI regular benefits 83.1% 81.8% -1.3
Between 20 and 24 weeks of entitlement for EI regular benefits 73.1% 71.1% -2.0
Between 25 and 29 weeks of entitlement for EI regular benefits 62.2% 59.5% -2.8
Between 30 and 34 weeks of entitlement for EI regular benefits 55.5% 56.1% +0.6
Between 35 and 39 weeks of entitlement for EI regular benefits 47.2% 50.3% +3.1
Between 40 and 44 weeks of entitlement for EI regular benefits 55.2% 44.9% -10.3
45 weeks of entitlement for EI regular benefits 49.4% 48.5% -0.9
Unemployment rate in the EI economic region: 6.0% or less 59.9% 60.9% +1.0
Unemployment rate in the EI economic region: Between 6.1% and 8.0% 64.8% 60.0% -4.8
Unemployment rate in the EI economic region: Between 8.1% and 10.0% 72.7% 60.4% -12.3
Unemployment rate in the EI economic region: Between 10.1% and 13.0% 72.9% 74.1% +1.1
Unemployment rate in the EI economic region: 13.1% or more 68.7% 71.2% +2.5
Did not work while on claim 68.5% 66.3% -2.1
Worked while on claim 58.9% 56.5% -2.5
Canada 64.1% 62.0% -2.1
  • Note: Changes in percentage points are based on unrounded numbers. Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Includes claims established on or after September 26, 2021 and completed in 2022‑23 or 2023‑24.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Source:  Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Conversely, higher proportions of entitlement used are generally associated with EI economic regions with higher unemployment rates. Although these EI regions typically provide higher entitlement, they are also often characterized by weaker labour market conditions. For claims completed in 2023‑24, those in lower EI unemployment rate regions (6% or lower) used on average 60.9% of their entitlement, whereas claims in higher EI unemployment rate regions (13.1% and higher) used on average 71.2% of their entitlement.

Claimants working while on claim generally use a lower portion of their entitlement, as they may have a stronger labour market attachment and may also defer weeks of EI regular benefits. This leads to a lower proportion of their entitlement weeks used compared to claimants who did not work while on claim (on average 56.5% versus 66.3%, respectively, in 2023‑24).Footnote 35

2.2.5 Exhaustion of Employment Insurance regular benefits

This subsection examines EI regular claims that end either when all the entitled weeks of benefits are paid to the claimant, or when the end of the benefit period is reached, before all the entitled weeks have been paid. Since a claim must be completed in order to determine whether the entitlement or benefit period is exhausted or not, the analysis in this subsection focuses on EI regular claims completed during the fiscal year. Statistics for the reporting fiscal year are preliminary estimates and are subject to revision in the future.

As mentioned in subsection 2.2.4, entitlement to EI regular benefits, ranging between 14 to 45 weeks, is determined based on 2 factors. The first is the unemployment rate in the EI region where claimants live at the time of establishing their claim and the second is the number of hours of insurable employment accumulated in the previous 52 weeks or since the establishment of their last claim, whichever is shorter. Claims also have a benefit period during which benefits can be paid. The benefit period is generally 52 weeks but may be extended under specific circumstances.Footnote 36

Claimants are considered to have exhausted their entitlement to EI regular benefits when the number of weeks of regular benefits paid (actual duration) equals the entitlement available over the course of the benefit period (the period during which an EI claimant can receive EI benefits). Measuring the entitlement exhaustion rate of EI regular benefits gives an indication of the support provided by EI regular benefits to those looking for suitable employment following a job separation.

Claimants are considered to have exhausted their benefit period when their benefit period ends before all weeks of entitlement to regular benefits have been paid. When this occurs, unless the claimant has stopped filing EI biweekly reports,Footnote 37 the claim is considered to have exhausted its benefit period.

Example: Entitlement exhaustion versus benefit period exhaustion

David works as a full-time chef at a restaurant in Toronto, Ontario. The restaurant closes permanently and he is laid off on October 14, 2022. Following the job separation, David applies for EI regular benefits. Service Canada determines that David is eligible for EI regular benefits and entitled to receive up to 19 weeks of EI regular benefits based on his accumulated hours of insurable employment during the qualifying period and the regional unemployment rate. Service Canada establishes David's benefit period (during which benefits may be collected) starting the week of October 23, 2022 for a length of 52 weeks. David starts receiving EI regular benefits in the week starting October 30, 2022.

Scenario: Entitlement exhaustion

David is unable to find suitable employment for the full 19 weeks of his EI regular benefits. As of March 11, 2023, he has exhausted his regular benefit entitlement as the number of weeks of benefits received equals the entitlement available during the benefit period. This is illustrated below.

Chart of entitlement exhaustion: description follows
Text description for scenario entitlement exhaustion

David loses his job on October 14, 2022. David starts to receive EI regular benefits on October 30, 2022. David reaches the end of his entitlement on March 11, 2023.

Scenario: Benefit period exhaustion

In this scenario, David starts receiving EI regular benefits in the week starting October 30, 2022 and continues for the next 15 weeks, until February 11, 2023. At that point, David becomes ill and unable to work, so transitions to EI sickness benefits. As of May 27, 2023, he has received the full 15 weeks of sickness benefits. David's health condition improves and starting on October 8, 2023 he is capable of and available for work, but unable to find suitable employment. He claims EI regular benefits for 2 weeks before reaching the end of his benefit period on October 21, 2023. Because David's benefit period ended before he could collect all 19 weeks of EI regular benefits that he was entitled to, in this case David is said to have exhausted his benefit period. This is illustrated below.

Chart of Benefit period exhaustion: description follows
Text description for scenario benefit period exhaustion

David loses his job on October 14, 2022. David starts to receive EI regular benefits on October 30, 2022. David switches to EI sickness benefits on February 11, 2023. David claims EI regular benefits for 2 weeks on October 8, 2023. David's benefit period ends, he has 2 weeks of uncollected EI regular benefits on October 21, 2023.

Entitlement exhaustion of Employment Insurance regular benefits

Of the total EI regular claims completed in 2023‑24, 34.5% exhausted their entitlement for EI regular benefits, a 1.9 p.p. decrease compared to claims established on or after September 26, 2021 that were completed in 2022‑23 (consult Chart 15). These latter claims were established when the maximum entitlement returned to the EI original rules of between 14 to 45 weeks. For simplicity, for the rest of the subsection, they are referred to as claims completed in 2022‑23. The entitlement exhaustion rate in 2023‑24 (34.5%) was lower than those recorded in 2020‑21 (36.9%) and 2022‑23 (36.4%) which were likely impacted by the economic slowdown due to the COVID‑19 pandemic and the EI temporary measures introduced to facilitate access to the EI program, respectively. In comparison, it was higher than the entitlement exhaustion rates observed before the pandemic (33.1% on average over the 2018‑19 and 2019‑20 period). This could be explained in part by an increase in the national unemployment rate during the reporting fiscal year‒rising from 5.1% in April 2023 to 6.1% in March 2024‒making it more difficult for unemployed individuals to find employment. In addition, the higher entitlement exhaustion rate could also be explained by the lower average maximum entitlement for claims completed in 2023‑24 than that of claims completed before the pandemic.

Chart 15 – Employment Insurance regular benefit entitlement exhaustion rate and benefit period exhaustion rate, Canada, 2014‑15 to 2023‑24
Chart 15: description follows
Text description for Chart 15
Year 2014‑15 2015‑16* 2016‑17* 2017‑18* 2018‑19 2019‑20 2020‑21** 2021‑22*** 2022‑23**** 2023‑24****
Entitlement exhaustion rate 33.3% 31.2% 34.9% 34.1% 33.0% 33.1% 36.9% Not comparable 36.4%R 34.5%P
Benefit period exhaustion rate 22.8% 22.7% 17.8% 18.2% 18.2% 20.4% 26.9% Not comparable 16.7%R 20.2%P
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • *A temporary measure extended the number of weeks of EI regular benefits for claimants in 15 EI economic regions that were hit the hardest by the downturn in commodity prices during this period.
  • **Includes claims established before March 15, 2020 and completed in 2020‑21.
  • ***Most claims completed in 2021‑22 were entitled 50 weeks of EI regular benefits, therefore their exhaustion rates are not comparable with the other fiscal years.
  • ****Includes claims established on or after September 26, 2021 and completed in 2022‑23 or 2023‑24.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Source:  Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2014‑15 to 2020‑21 and 100% of data for 2022‑23 and 2023‑24.

All provinces and territories registered entitlement exhaustion rates above the national level for claims completed in 2023‑24, except for Quebec and Ontario. As illustrated in Table 25, despite a decrease at the national level, the entitlement exhaustion rate increased in 6 jurisdictions in 2023‑24 compared to 2022‑23, with the most notable rise in Nunavut (+10.5 p.p.), Newfoundland and Labrador (+6.1 p.p.) and New Brunswick (+4.4 p.p.).

Table 25 – Entitlement and benefit period exhaustion rates of completed claims for Employment Insurance regular benefits by province or territory, gender, age and claimant category, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24*
Category Entitlement exhaustion rate 2022‑23 Entitlement exhaustion rate 2023‑24P Change in entitlement exhaustion rate (% points) Benefit period exhaustion rate 2022‑23 Benefit period exhaustion rate 2023‑24P Change in benefit period exhaustion rate (% points)
Newfoundland and Labrador 34.5%R 40.6% +6.1 39.4%R 36.4% -3.1
Prince Edward Island 40.8%R 43.0% +2.2 25.6% 26.8% +1.2
Nova Scotia 43.4%R 44.1% +0.7 21.8%R 22.7% +0.9
New Brunswick 37.3% 41.7% +4.4 32.5%R 30.5% -2.1
Quebec 34.1%R 30.0% -4.1 18.4%R 23.8% +5.4
Ontario 35.7%R 33.8% -1.9 11.7%R 16.0% +4.3
Manitoba 38.9% 35.4% -3.5 12.9%R 19.2% +6.2
Saskatchewan 36.5%R 36.8% +0.4 15.4%R 19.2% +3.7
Alberta 38.6%R 36.1% -2.5 11.2%R 16.0% +4.8
British Columbia 38.6%R 36.0% -2.6 10.8%R 14.2% +3.4
Yukon 44.5%R 42.8% -1.6 13.8% 15.8% +2.0
Northwest Territories 60.5%R 36.1% -24.4 7.2%R 6.8% -0.3
Nunavut 37.3%R 47.8% +10.5 11.6%R 11.1% -0.5
Men 35.8%R 34.9% -0.9 20.4%R 21.1% +0.7
Women 37.3% 33.8% -3.5 11.1%R 19.0% +7.9
24 years old and under 38.1%R 35.8% -2.3 11.6%R 14.2% +2.6
25 to 44 years old 32.8%R 31.4% -1.3 14.5%R 18.1% +3.6
45 to 54 years old 32.9%R 31.3% -1.6 18.9%R 23.1% +4.2
55 years old and over 44.2%R 41.9% -2.3 20.7%R 24.1% +3.4
Long-tenured workers 23.8%R 21.8% -2.0 13.5%R 20.0% +6.5
Occasional claimants 39.4%R 36.7% -2.7 11.3%R 16.3% +5.0
Frequent claimants 40.0%R 41.8% +1.8 32.4%R 30.8% -1.6
Canada 36.4% R 34.5% -1.9 16.7% R 20.2% +3.5
  • Note: Changes in percentage points are based on unrounded numbers. Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Includes claims established on or after September 26, 2021 and completed in 2022‑23 or 2023‑24.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Source:  Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Claims established by women tend to have a higher entitlement exhaustion rate compared to claims established by men. This may be due to the fact that, on average, women qualified for fewer weeks of entitlement to EI regular benefits than men (27.3 weeks compared to 29.2 weeks, respectively, consult Table 22 in subsection 2.2.4). A higher proportion of women work in part-time or temporary jobs than men, and thus accumulate fewer hours of insurable employment on average, resulting in lower entitlement. However, this trend was reversed for claims completed in 2023‑24, as the entitlement exhaustion rate of EI regular claims established by women (33.8%) was slightly less than that by men (34.9%).

By age group, claimants aged 55 and over had the highest entitlement exhaustion rate (41.9%), followed by those aged 24 and under (35.8%). These claimants tend to exhaust their entitlement more often, which may reflect their lower entitlement on average, as well as the challenges they face in securing new employment following a job loss.

By EI claimant category, long-tenured workers had a lower entitlement exhaustion rate than occasional claimants and frequent claimants for claims completed in 2023‑24. Similar to the national level, the entitlement exhaustion rate of claims established by long-tenured workers and occasional claimants decreased compared to 2022‑23 but increased for claims established by frequent claimants (+1.8 p.p.).

Benefit period exhaustion of Employment Insurance regular benefits

When a claimant's benefit period ends before all weeks of entitlement to EI regular benefits have been paid, unless the claimant has stopped filing EI biweekly reports, the benefit period is considered to have been exhausted. As shown in Chart 15, the benefit period exhaustion rate is generally lower than the entitlement exhaustion rate.

In 2023‑24, 20.2% of all completed EI regular claims exhausted their benefit period (consult Table 25). This rate was 3.5 p.p. higher than that observed for claims completed in 2022‑23 (16.7%) and similar to those recorded in pre-pandemic fiscal years (18.2% in 2018‑19 and 20.4% in 2019‑20).

In general, claims established in the Atlantic provinces, by older claimants and frequent claimants have a higher benefit period exhaustion rate than the national level. This may be explained by the different factors presented below.

Entitlement exhaustion versus benefit period exhaustion

The circumstances that result in benefit period exhaustion are generally different from those associated with entitlement exhaustion. Many variables influence benefit period exhaustion, including regular benefit entitlement, weeks worked while on claim (leading to deferred benefit weeks) and the use of special benefits (adding another type of benefits to the claim).

Table 26 outlines different characteristics of completed EI regular claims by exhaustion type in 2023‑24. For instance, EI regular claims in EI economic regions with lower unemployment rates were generally less likely to exhaust their benefit period in 2023‑24 compared to claims established in EI regions with higher unemployment rates. Likewise, claims established in EI economic regions with lower unemployment rates tend to have lower entitlement exhaustion rates in 2023‑24 than those established in EI regions with higher unemployment rates.

Table 26 – Completed claims for Employment Insurance regular benefits by exhaustion type and characteristics, Canada, 2023‑24*
Category Entitlement exhaustionp Benefit period exhaustionp
Exhaustion rate – overall 34.5% 20.2%
Regional unemployment rate at the time of claim establishment: 6.0% or less 34.1% 18.3%
Regional unemployment rate at the time of claim establishment: 6.1% to 8.0% 32.7% 18.9%
Regional unemployment rate at the time of claim establishment: 8.1% to 10.0% 34.2% 20.2%
Regional unemployment rate at the time of claim establishment: 10.1% to 13.0% 41.8% 33.3%
Regional unemployment rate at the time of claim establishment: 13.1% or above 38.5% 35.4%
Proportion of exhausted claims involving at least one week worked while on claim 28.7% 69.6%
Average weeks worked while on claim** 10.9 weeks 15.2 weeks
Requalification rate for EI regular benefits*** 9.0% 74.5%
Average weeks of EI regular benefits paid 24.4 weeks 16.1 weeks
Share of mixed claims (EI regular and special benefits) 9.8% 17.4%
Average proportion of regular benefits entitlement used 100.0% of weeks 52.5% of weeks
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Includes claims established on or after September 26, 2021 and completed in 2023‑24.
  • ** Includes only claims with at least one week worked while on claim.
  • *** The requalification rate refers to the proportion of claimants who are able to requalify for a new claim within 4 weeks following the termination of their claim.
  • p Preliminary data.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Furthermore, a much greater proportion of claims that exhausted the benefit period included at least one week worked while on claim (69.6%) compared with claims that exhausted their entitlement (28.7%). This is likely due to the Working While on Claim provision that allows claimants to defer weeks of entitlement to be used later in the benefit period. Claims that had at least one week worked while on claim and exhausted their benefit period had, on average, a greater number of weeks worked while on claim (15.2 weeks) compared with claims that exhausted their entitlement (10.9 weeks).

Because a larger share of claims that exhausted their benefit period also worked while on claim, claimants who exhausted their benefit period are more likely to accumulate enough hours of insurable employment during their benefit period to meet the eligibility requirements to establish a new claim following the end of their claim. As a result, a much greater proportion of claims who exhausted the benefit period (74.5%) requalified for a new claim within 4 weeks following the termination of the claim compared with completed claims that exhausted their entitlement (9.0%).

In addition, completed claims that exhausted their benefit period received fewer weeks of EI regular benefits on average (16.1 weeks) compared with claims that exhausted their entitlement (24.4 weeks) in 2023‑24 (consult Table 26). Completed EI regular claims that exhausted their benefit period used, on average, just over half (52.5%) of their entitlement. Among completed EI claims combining regular and special benefits, the share that exhausted their benefit period was greater than the share that exhausted their entitlement in 2023‑24 (17.4% and 9.8%, respectively).

2.2.6 Employment Insurance regular benefits and seasonal claimants

Seasonal claimants are EI claimants who had at least 3 regular or fishing claims in the 5 years preceding the reference (current) claim, with at least 2 of these claims having started during the same time of year as the current claim.Footnote 38,Footnote 39 The definition of seasonal claimants is not exclusive of the definitions for other EI claimant categories.Footnote 40

As outlined in the definition, claims established by seasonal claimants can include both EI regular and fishing claims. In 2023‑24, a total of 409,900 claims were established by seasonal claimants. Of those, 388,100 claims (94.7%) were for EI regular benefits, which is slightly higher than the 382,000 claims recorded in the previous fiscal year. The remaining 21,800 claims (5.3%) in 2023‑24 were for EI fishing benefits.Footnote 41 The analysis presented in this subsection focuses only on regular claims established by seasonal claimants.Footnote 42 For simplicity, in the rest of this subsection, these claims are referred to as seasonal regular claims.

The seasonal regular claims' share of all regular claims established in 2023‑24 was 28.2%. As illustrated in Chart 16, this was comparable to the shares recorded in 2022‑23 and in fiscal years before the pandemic. The lower share (23.5%) observed in 2021‑22 could be due in part to the significantly high number of non-seasonal regular claims established at that time.

Chart 16 – Number of Employment Insurance seasonal regular claims and share among total regular claims, Canada, 2014‑15 to 2023‑24
Chart 16: description follows
Text description for Chart 16
Year 2014‑15 2015‑16 2016‑17 2017‑18 2018‑19 2019‑20 2020‑21* 2021‑22 2022‑23 2023‑24
Number of seasonal regular claims established ('000s) 419.7 425.7 380.7 381.1 395.3 413.4 Not comparable 342.8 382.0 388.1
Seasonal regular claims as share of all regular claims 31.1% 29.7% 28.8% 29.3% 30.6% 30.2% Not comparable 23.5% 29.7% 28.2%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Claims for EI regular benefits could not be established during the first half of 2020‑21 due to the implementation of the Canada Emergency Response Benefits. Consequently, results for 2020‑21 are not comparable with other fiscal years.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2014‑15 to 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

Similar to the national level, the number of EI seasonal regular claims increased in all jurisdictions in 2023‑24 compared to the previous fiscal year, except for Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba and British Columbia (consult Table 27). The decrease observed in the 3 Atlantic provinces was also recorded among all EI regular claims and occurred at the same time as a decline in seasonal employment in these provinces based on the Labour Force Survey (consult the text box ‘Seasonal workers in the Labour Force Survey' below). In comparison, the number of EI seasonal regular claims increased across genders and age groups between 2022‑23 and 2023‑24.

Table 27 – Employment Insurance seasonal regular claims by region, gender, age and industry, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category Number of seasonal regular claims 2022‑23 Number of seasonal regular claims 2023‑24 Seasonal regular claims as a share of total regular claims (%) 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 28,460 28,008 48.6%
Prince Edward Island 6,930 7,058 47.1%
Nova Scotia 21,520 20,297 37.8%
New Brunswick 29,720 28,849 47.2%
Quebec 133,170 137,181 34.7%
Ontario 90,730 93,995 22.2%
Manitoba 12,130 12,090 27.0%
Saskatchewan 9,940 9,975 27.6%
Alberta 22,310 24,377 17.4%
British Columbia 26,490 25,601 17.8%
Territories 590 664 16.2%
Men 240,340 245,570 29.6%
Women 141,650 142,525 26.1%
24 years old and under 7,670 8,173 6.4%
25 to 44 years old 140,720 143,843 22.5%
45 to 54 years old 89,660 90,382 34.7%
55 years old and over 143,940 145,697 42.0%
Goods-producing industries 173,310 177,813 34.6%
Services-producing industries 201,830 205,414 24.7%
Unclassified industries* 6,850 4,868 16.3%
Canada 381,990 388,095 28.2%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * For some claims, industry information was not available in the data.
  • Consult Annex 2.9 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

As in the past, the share of seasonal regular claims among total regular claims was higher in Atlantic provinces and Quebec, compared to Ontario, the Western provinces and the Territories. This may be attributed to the composition of industries in the Atlantic provinces and Quebec, which contain a large share of goods-producing industries. As shown in Table 27, goods-producing industries had a higher share of EI seasonal regular claims among all regular claims than service-producing industries (34.6% vs 24.7% in 2023‑24). This can be due to a larger proportion of seasonal employment notably in the Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting industry and the Construction industry.

The share of seasonal regular claims as a proportion of all EI regular claims for women was relatively close to the share for men in 2023‑24. Claimants aged 55 and above continued to have the highest share (42.0%) of EI seasonal regular claims among all regular claims across all age groups in 2023‑24. In comparison, the share of seasonal regular claims established by younger claimants (aged 24 and less) remained low (6.4% of all regular claims) in 2023‑24. Although younger individuals are more likely to work in seasonal jobs (consult the text box ‘Seasonal workers in the Labour Force Survey' below), a larger share of them tend to quit jobs and return to school, which is not a valid reason for job separation under the Employment Insurance Act. Consequently, they are disqualified from receiving EI benefits. In addition, younger claimants are less likely to have the historical claiming pattern to meet the condition to be defined as seasonal claimants.

Seasonal workers in the Labour Force Survey

Every month, Statistics Canada provides information on employment, unemployment and other key labour market indicators by a variety of demographic characteristics through the Labour Force Survey (LFS). According to the LFS, there were 370,900 seasonal workers in Canada* in 2023‑24, up by 6.6% from the previous year. Though this figure is similar to that of EI seasonal regular claims established in 2023‑24 (388,100), the 2 measures are very different.  The definition of seasonal claimants used by the EI program is based on the claimant's recent history of EI regular and fishing benefits usage, while the LFS defines seasonal workers as those who identify their employment as temporary due to being seasonal in nature.

Based on the LFS, seasonal workers represented 2.1% of total employment in 2023‑24, similar to the previous fiscal year. Among the total temporary employment,** seasonal workers accounted for 18.3% in 2023‑24, up slightly from 2022‑23. In Atlantic provinces, seasonal workers accounted for 3.7% of total employment in 2023‑24, lower than the previous fiscal year (4.4%). This was attributable to a decline in seasonal employment in Newfoundland and Labrador (‑12.7%), Nova Scotia (‑7.9%) and New Brunswick (‑25.5%) in 2023‑24 compared to 2022‑23. In comparison, seasonal workers accounted for 1.9% of total employment in the Western provinces and Ontario, and 2.4% in Quebec in 2023‑24, slightly higher or unchanged from the previous fiscal year. Quebec had the largest increase in seasonal employment (+16.8%) in 2023‑24, followed by Ontario (+12.9%) compared to 2022‑23.

Historically, younger individuals (aged between 15 and 24 years old) are more likely to work in seasonal jobs, attributed to summer employment patterns for students. This remained true in 2023‑24, as young workers accounted for 45.9% of total seasonal workers. Men are also over-represented in seasonal employment. In 2023‑24, they accounted for 61.1% of all seasonal employment.

Seasonal employment is largely concentrated in the services-producing industries. In 2023‑24, more than two thirds (70.9%) of all seasonal jobs were in the services-producing industries. The Information, culture and recreation industry (19.4% of all seasonal jobs) and the Accommodation and food services industry (11.2% of all seasonal jobs) accounted for almost a third of all seasonal jobs in Canada in 2023‑24. On the other hand, the Construction industry in the goods-producing sector accounted for 14.8% of all seasonal jobs in 2023‑24.

  • * Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, Table 14-10-0071-01.
  • ** In the Labour Force Survey questionnaire, respondents are first asked to identify if their job is permanent or not. Respondents whose employment is not permanent are asked to identify the way in which it is not permanent: seasonal jobs; temporary, term or contract jobs including work done through a temporary help agency; casual jobs; and other temporary work.

Generally, the number of EI seasonal regular claims established throughout the year varies by quarter. For instance, 59.5% of all seasonal regular claims established in 2023‑24 were established in the third quarter (October to December) of the fiscal year (consult Chart 17). This can be attributed to the slowdown in many seasonal industries during that time of year. The dominance of seasonal regular claims in the third quarter was consistently observed in all parts of Canada.

Chart 17 – Distribution of Employment Insurance seasonal regular claims by quarter and region, Canada, 2023‑24
Chart 17: description follows
Text description for Chart 17
Region Q1 (April to June) Q2 (July to September) Q3 (October to December) Q4 (January to March)
Atlantic provinces 7.1% 14.5% 62.7% 15.7%
Quebec 6.2% 14.9% 68.2% 10.7%
Ontario 6.5% 27.4% 51.6% 14.4%
Western provinces 10.0% 30.0% 49.3% 10.7%
Territories 10.2% 14.2% 65.5% 10.1%
Canada 7.2% 20.7% 59.5% 12.7%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

As outlined in Table 28, seasonal regular claims were more likely to be established in the third quarter of the year by men, claimants aged below 25 years old, and claimants in the goods-producing industries. Though claimants in the services-producing industries were also more likely to establish seasonal regular claims in the third quarter of the fiscal year, 42.9% of claims within these industries were established in the first 2 quarters. This is likely due to the summer "off-season" in the Educational services industry, reflecting school closures during that period of the year.

Table 28 – Quarterly distribution of Employment Insurance seasonal regular claims by gender, age and industry, Canada, 2023‑24
Category Share of claims established in Q1 (April to June) Share of claims established in Q2 (July to September) Share of claims established in Q3 (October to December) Share of claims established in Q4 (January to March)
Men 5.0% 9.1% 70.4% 15.5%
Women 10.9% 40.5% 40.7% 7.8%
24 years old and under 2.6% 9.3% 73.1% 15.1%
25 to 44 years old 5.7% 18.6% 62.8% 12.8%
45 to 54 years old 8.1% 26.0% 54.2% 11.6%
55 years old and over 8.3% 19.9% 58.6% 13.1%
Goods-producing-industries 3.3% 7.4% 73.7% 15.6%
Services-producing industries 10.6% 32.3% 47.0% 10.1%
Unclassified industries* 4.7% 11.4% 67.2% 16.8%
Canada 7.2% 20.7% 59.5% 12.7%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * For some claims, industry information was not available in the data.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Level of Employment Insurance regular benefits for seasonal claimants

The average weekly benefit rate for seasonal regular claims established in 2023‑24 was $580 (consult Annex 2.9.3). This was higher than the average weekly benefit rate for non-seasonal regular claims ($551) established during the same period.

Duration and exhaustion of Employment Insurance regular benefits among seasonal claimants

The average maximum entitlement of seasonal regular claims completed in 2023‑24 was 28.8 weeks.Footnote 43 This was comparable to the average maximum entitlement recorded for claims completed in 2022‑23 that were established on or after September 26, 2021 (29.7 weeks). These latter claims were established when the maximum entitlement returned to the pre‑pandemic range of between 14 to 45 weeks. For simplicity, for the rest of the subsection, they are referred to as claims completed in 2022‑23. In comparison, the average maximum entitlement of non-seasonal regular claims completed in 2023‑24 was 28.3 weeks.

The average actual duration of seasonal regular claims completed in 2023‑24 was 16.3 weeks, down from 17.5 weeks in the previous fiscal year (‑1.2 weeks or ‑6.7%) (consult Annex 2.9.2). It was 16.9 weeks on average for non-seasonal regular claims completed in 2023‑24, relatively unchanged from 2022‑23 (16.5 weeks). In addition, seasonal regular claims completed in 2023‑24 used on average a slightly lower share of their entitlement of regular benefits than non-seasonal regular claims (60.1% versus 62.8%, respectively).

The average maximum entitlement and the average actual duration of regular claims are usually shorter for seasonal claimants than for non-seasonal claimants. This reflects the fact that seasonal claimants typically accumulate fewer hours of insurable employment prior to establishing a claim than non-seasonal claimants. In 2023‑24, the average maximum entitlement and average actual duration of seasonal regular claims were similar to those of non-seasonal claims in the same period. This was likely due to the additional weeks of EI regular benefits provided to eligible seasonal claimants in targeted EI economic regions under a temporary support measure (consult the subsection ‘Temporary support measure providing additional weeks of EI regular benefits to seasonal claimants in 13 EI economic regions' below).

As mentioned in subsection 2.2.5, claims may end either when the number of weeks of regular benefits paid equals the entitlement to EI regular benefits over the course of the benefit period (referred to as entitlement exhaustion) or when the benefit period ends before all regular benefit weeks of entitlement have been paid (referred to as benefit period exhaustion). When EI regular claims completed in 2023‑24 are categorized by their seasonality status, claims established by seasonal claimants had a lower entitlement exhaustion rate than those established by non-seasonal claimants (26.7% and 37.6%, respectively), but this result was reversed when benefit period exhaustion is considered (32.8% and 15.1%, respectively). This means that seasonal claimants were less likely to collect all their entitled weeks of EI regular benefits than non-seasonal claimants. This is most likely due to the timing of their work seasons.Footnote 44

Alternative definitions of seasonal claimants

A recent departmental study* examined how the incidence of seasonal regular claims varied based on alternative definitions of a seasonal claim, and how the usage of EI regular benefits (in terms of entitlement, proportion of entitlement used and entitlement exhaustion) changed across the definitions.

In addition to the standard definition of seasonal claimants already used in the EI monitoring and assessment report, the study examined 2 alternative definitions:

  • a strictly seasonal claimant is a claimant who established 5 or more regular or fishing claims in the 5 years preceding the reference claim, with at least 3 of these claims established within a 17‑week window of the current claim's establishment date
  • a mostly seasonal claimant is a claimant who established 4 or more regular or fishing claims in the 5 years preceding the refence claim, with at least 3 of these claims established within a 13‑week window of the current claim's establishment date

Based on these definitions, the number of seasonal regular claims varied between about 400,000 and 210,000 annually (representing about 31% and 16% of EI regular claims) over the 2005 to 2023 period (excluding 2021 and 2022 due to the COVID‑19 pandemic). The usage of EI regular benefits was similar across all 3 definitions. The average maximum entitlement was around 33 weeks for the 3 definitions of seasonal claimants over the examined period. Their proportion of entitlement used ranged from 59% to 61%, while they all had an entitlement exhaustion rate of 21% on average over the examined period.

The study also looked at the claiming pattern by quarter. Similar to results presented in the EI MAR, it found that a high proportion of seasonal regular claims were established at the end of the calendar year (mostly by men) and, to a lower extent, in the middle of the calendar year (mostly by women). Results from the study showed that seasonal regular claims established in the fourth quarter of a calendar year had relatively similar average maximum entitlement than those established in other quarters over the 2005 to 2023 period. However, they used a higher proportion of their entitlement and had a higher entitlement exhaustion rate (65% and 57%, respectively, for the standard seasonal definition) than claims established in other quarters. The higher usage of EI regular benefits by seasonal regular claims established in the fourth quarter of a calendar year was found across the 3 definitions of seasonal claimants.

* ESDC, Alternative approaches to define a seasonal claimant using Employment Insurance administrative data (Ottawa: ESDC, Evaluation Directorate, 2025).

Overlapping definitions of seasonal and frequent claimants

Frequent EI claimants are defined as those who, within the past 5 years, have had 3 or more regular or fishing claims and have collected benefits for more than 60 weeks in total. Seasonal claimants are not considered frequent if they collected less than 60 weeks of EI regular or fishing benefits or both over the previous 5 years. Frequent claimants are not considered seasonal if they do not have at least 2 prior regular or fishing claims established at around the same time of year as their reference claim. However, there is a significant overlap between frequent claimants and seasonal claimants.

In 2023‑24, the total number of EI regular claims established by seasonal or frequent or both claimants was 442,200. Among them, 224,600 claims were established by claimants who were both seasonal and frequent, representing 50.8% of the total regular claims established by seasonal or frequent or both claimants in 2023‑24 (consult Chart 18). Seasonal claimants who were non-frequent accounted for 37.0% of the total 442,200 regular claims established by seasonal or frequent or both claimants, whereas frequent non-seasonal claimants accounted for 12.2%.

Chart 18 – Distribution of Employment Insurance regular claims by frequent and seasonal status, Canada, 2023‑24
Chart 18: description follows
Text description for Chart 18
Category Frequent, non-seasonal Frequent and seasonal Non-frequent, seasonal Total frequent or seasonal
Number of regular claims 54,100 224,600 163,500 442,200
Share of total frequent or seasonal claims 12.2% 50.8% 37.0% 100.0%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Table 29 compares the average duration, proportion of weeks of EI regular benefits used and entitlement exhaustion rate of EI regular claims established by the 3 groups and completed in 2023‑24. In general, frequent claimants use more EI support than non-frequent claimants. Among frequent claimants, non-seasonal claimants typically receive, on average, EI regular benefits for longer duration, use a greater proportion of their regular entitlement weeks and are more likely to exhaust their entitlement than seasonal claimants. This is likely due to seasonal claimants returning to their seasonal employment.

Table 29 – Characteristics of completed Employment Insurance regular claims by frequent and seasonal status, Canada, 2023‑24
Claimant type Average duration of EI regular claims (in weeks)P Proportion of weeks of EI regular benefits used (%)P Entitlement exhaustion rate (%)P
Frequent, non-seasonal 19.9 76.6% 48.4%
Frequent and seasonal 20.8 76.3% 40.1%
Non-frequent, seasonal 10.2 37.6% 8.1%
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Temporary support measure providing additional weeks of EI regular benefits to seasonal claimants in 13 EI economic regionsFootnote 45

In August 2018, to better support seasonal workers, the government introduced a pilot project (Pilot Project No. 21) in 13 EI economic regionsFootnote 46 of the country. This pilot project provided up to 5 additional weeks of EI regular benefits—to a maximum of 45 weeks—to eligible seasonal claimants who started a benefit period between August 5, 2018 and September 25, 2021. The parameters of the pilot project, including eligible EI regions, were then temporarily replicated through amendments to the Employment Insurance Act. Most recently, Budget 2024 extended this temporary legislated support for seasonal claimants until October 24, 2026. In addition, in 2022 a legislative fix was introduced to ensure that the timing of the temporary COVID‑19 measures would not affect access to this temporary seasonal measure.Footnote 47

Moreover, to further support seasonal claimants from steep declines in unemployment rates, the government introduced Pilot Project No. 22 in the same 13 targeted EI economic regions. This pilot project provided up to 4 additional weeks, on top of the 5 additional weeks available under the existing temporary seasonal measure, to seasonal claimants who started a benefit period between September 10, 2023, and September 7, 2024, and who met the criteria of the existing seasonal measure. The maximum entitlement of 45 weeks of regular benefits remained in place.

Methodological change for reporting on the temporary support measure for seasonal claimants

In previous EI Monitoring and Assessment Reports, most results on the temporary support measure were reported cumulatively since the beginning of the measure in August 2018. Starting with this year's report, results will focus mainly on the reporting fiscal year to better reflect the labour market conditions and the usage of additional weeks of EI regular benefits occurring during the reporting period.

This change leads to a small difference in the number of eligible seasonal regular claims between the 2 methodologies. Consequently, results for 2023‑24 are not fully comparable with previous years' results.

In the 13 targeted EI economic regions, there were about 146,800 regular claims completed in 2023‑24 that were eligible for additional weeks of regular benefits under the temporary seasonal measure. Among them, 129,100 claims were established by seasonal claimants, and 17,700 claims were not eligible according to the original conditions of the seasonal measure but became eligible under the legislative fix. For simplicity, for the rest of this subsection, they are referred to as the eligible claims completed in 2023‑24. Among the 146,800 eligible claims completed in 2023‑24, about 66,300 (45.2%) used at least one additional week of regular benefits. This included 8,200 claims (46.2% out of the 17,700 claims) that became eligible under the legislative fix and used at least one additional week of regular benefits.

Among all eligible claims completed in 2023‑24, the proportion that used at least one additional week of benefits under the temporary seasonal measure ranged from 59.9% in the EI region of Restigouche-Albert to 27.3% in Chicoutimi-Jonquiere (consult Table 30). In addition, more than half of eligible claims established by claimants aged 55 years and over used at least one additional week. A higher proportion of eligible claims established by women used at least one additional week than those established by men (50.5% and 42.8%, respectively). A smaller proportion of eligible claims established by claimants who had worked in the Construction industry used at least one additional week compared to claimants who had worked in the Accommodation and food services industry or the Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting industry.

Table 30 – Number and proportion of completed Employment Insurance seasonal regular claims* eligible for additional weeks of regular benefits and that used at least one additional week, by the 13 targeted EI regions, gender, age and selected industries, Canada, 2023‑24
Category Number of eligible claimsP Number of claims that used additional weeksP Proportion of claims that used additional weeks (%)P
Newfoundland-Labrador (excluding St. John's) 21,951 11,890 54.2%
Charlottetown 1,241 607 48.9%
Prince Edward Island (excluding Charlottetown) 6,624 3,419 51.6%
Eastern Nova Scotia 9,531 5,654 59.3%
Western Nova Scotia 10,896 5,282 48.5%
Madawaska-Charlotte 4,313 2,089 48.4%
Restigouche-Albert 19,923 11,926 59.9%
Gaspésie-Îles-de-la-Madeleine 13,653 7,204 52.8%
Central Quebec 30,718 8,428 27.4%
North Western Quebec 6,347 2,476 39.0%
Lower Saint Lawrence and North Shore 17,419 6,171 35.4%
Chicoutimi-Jonquière 4,025 1,098 27.3%
Yukon (excluding Whitehorse) 179 79 44.1%
Men 101,898 43,632 42.8%
Women 44,922 22,691 50.5%
24 years old and under 3,323 1,435 43.2%
25 to 44 years old 48,457 17,365 35.8%
45 to 54 years old 31,055 12,552 40.4%
55 years old and over 63,985 34,971 54.7%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting industry 17,123 11,073 64.7%
Construction industry 41,374 12,646 30.6%
Accommodation and food services industry 7,962 5,069 63.7%
13 regions 146,820 66,323 45.2%
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Regular claims in this table include claims that were not eligible for the temporary seasonal measure according to the original rules, but became eligible under the legislative fix introduced in 2022.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Among the 146,800 eligible claims completed in 2023‑24, 138,900 were entitled up to 5 additional weeks of EI regular benefits, and 47.2% (65,500 of 138,900) used at least one additional week of regular benefits. Among these 65,500 claims, almost all were entitled to have the full 5 extra weeks, and 72.3% used the full additional 5 weeks of regular benefits. On average, eligible claims entitled up to 5 additional weeks that used at least one additional week of benefits under the temporary seasonal measure received 4.3 additional weeks of EI regular benefits. The number of additional weeks used was, on average, almost identical for men and women, across different age groups, and for claimants who had worked in services-producing industries compared to those who had worked in goods-producing industries.

Furthermore, among the 146,800 eligible claims completed in 2023‑24, the remaining 8,000 were established when the Pilot Project No. 22 was in effect and were entitled to 6 to 9 additional weeks of EI regular benefits (up to 4 additional on top of the 5 additional weeks). Given the short period between the start of the Pilot Project No. 22 on September 10, 2023, and the end of the reporting period (March 31, 2024), a low number of completed claims used at least one of the 4 additional weeks provided under the Pilot Project No. 22. Statistics based on a higher volume of claims completed will be presented in future Monitoring and Assessment Reports. Therefore, results on eligible claims completed in 2023‑24 that were entitled to 6 to 9 additional weeks of regular benefits are not discussed.

As of March 31, 2024, 525,300 claims established by seasonal claimants on or after August 5, 2018 were eligible for additional weeks of regular benefits under the temporary seasonal measure (including 43,700 claims that were not eligible according to the original conditions of the seasonal measure but became eligible under the legislative fix). Among the total, 227,700 (43.4%) used at least one additional week of regular benefits (including 19,000 under the legislative fix). For claims that used one to 5 additional weeks, they received on average 4.2 additional weeks of regular benefits since the start of the temporary seasonal measure. As of March 31, 2024, $422.2 million in additional benefits had been paid to eligible seasonal claimants who used additional weeks of EI regular benefits under either Pilot Project No. 21, the temporary legislative measure for seasonal workers, or Pilot Project No. 22 (including $37.3 million paid under the legislative fix) since Pilot Project No. 21 was first introduced on August 5, 2018.

Entitlement exhaustion of Employment Insurance regular benefits: seasonal and non-seasonal gappers

Claimants of EI regular benefits who have exhausted their entitlement weeks may go through a period without income from either employment or EI benefits before they find work or return to work at the start of the next employment season. These claimants, known as "gappers", have not accumulated sufficient hours of insurable employment during their qualifying period for their entitlement to cover the entire duration of their unemployment spell.

To be considered a gapper, a claimant must have established a regular claim during the reporting fiscal year, have completed their previous regular benefit claim during the reporting fiscal year or the previous fiscal year and must have experienced a period without employment income or EI income immediately following the exhaustion of the preceding claim. The period with no income must be 15 weeks or less. While this is more common for seasonal claimants due to their work and EI claiming patterns, it can affect non-seasonal claimants as well.

Of the 1.37 million EI regular claims established in 2023‑24, approximately 84,900 (6.2%) experienced a gap in income based on the gapper definition (consult Table 31). This is slightly higher than the proportions registered in 2022‑23 (5.8%) and before the pandemic in 2019‑20 (5.5%). The average length of the gap was 5.3 weeks in 2023‑24, similar to 5.2 weeks recorded in 2022‑23.

Table 31 ─ Number of gappers and share among all Employment Insurance regular claims by region and seasonality, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category Number of gappers 2022‑23 Number of gappers 2023‑24 Share (%) of gappers among regular claims 2022‑23 Share (%) of gappers among regular claims 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 3,810 4,797 6.4% 8.3%
Prince Edward Island 970 1,718 6.8% 11.5%
Nova Scotia 3,740 4,823 6.8% 9.0%
New Brunswick 4,340 5,604 6.9% 9.2%
Quebec 22,260 24,760 5.9% 6.3%
Ontario 19,540 21,124 5.2% 5.0%
Manitoba 3,080 3,343 7.1% 7.5%
Saskatchewan 2,260 2,612 6.4% 7.2%
Alberta 7,290 8,235 5.8% 5.9%
British Columbia 7,270 7,470 5.4% 5.2%
Territories 410 375 12.0% 9.2%
Seasonal 27,070 38,576 7.1% 9.9%
Non-seasonal 47,900 46,285 5.3% 4.7%
Canada 74,970 84,861 5.8% 6.2%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

The incidence of gappers by region shows that all provinces and territories, except Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia, registered a share of gappers above the national average in 2023‑24 (6.2%) (consult Table 31). This is mostly attributable to the composition of the local labour markets.

In 2023‑24, 9.9% of claims established by seasonal claimants experienced an income gap compared to 4.7% for claims established by non-seasonal claimants. Receiving additional weeks of EI regular benefits through the temporary support measure for seasonal claimants (consult the subsection above) helps reduce the length of the period without any income. As a result, among regular claims established in 2023‑24, the proportion of seasonal gappers in the 13 EI economic regions participating in the temporary support measure (9.0%) was lower than the proportion of seasonal gappers in EI economic regions outside the scope of this temporary support measure (10.5%).

2.2.7 Working while on claim

In addition to providing temporary income support to eligible unemployed contributors, the EI program is also designed to encourage claimants to accept available jobs, maintain their skills and remain connected to the labour market while they receive EI regular benefits. The Working While on Claim (WWC) provision of the Employment Insurance ActFootnote 48 allows claimants to earn additional employment income while on claim. The WWC provision applies to all types of EI benefits.

The WWC provision determines how EI benefits are adjusted to reflect employment income earned while on claim. It allows claimants to keep their employment earnings while continuing to receive a portion of their EI benefits, up to a limit after which benefits are reduced dollar-for-dollar. If benefits are reduced to zero, the week of entitlement is deferred and can be used later during the benefit period.Footnote 49

Under the WWC provision, claimants can keep 50 cents of their EI benefits for every dollar earned while on claim, up to a maximum of 90% of the average weekly insurable earnings used to calculate their weekly benefit rate, before benefits are reduced dollar-for-dollar.Footnote 50

Working while on claim (illustrative example)

Sophia used to work full-time at a construction company where she earned $600 per week before getting laid off due to a reduction in workload. Following the job loss, she applies for EI regular benefits and her weekly benefit rate is calculated to be $330 (55% of $600). However, after a few weeks she finds part-time employment at a local plumbing company where she can work 3 days per week and earn $350 per week.

When Sophia starts working part-time, she simply needs to declare her earnings on her bi‑weekly EI report. In this case, her weekly EI regular benefits are reduced by $175 or 50 cents for every dollar she earns at her part-time job (50% of $350). This brings her total weekly EI regular benefits to $155 ($330-$175=$155).

In the end, under the Working While on Claim provision, Sophia takes home $505* in total weekly income ($155 in weekly EI regular benefits and $350 from her part-time work), compared to $330 from EI regular benefits if she does not work while on claim.

* Her total weekly income is under 90% of the average weekly insurable earnings used to calculate her weekly benefit rate (90% of $600 would be $540).

This subsection focuses on claims where claimants reported employment income from part‑time or full‑time work in at least one week while on claim, regardless of whether the EI benefits for those weeks were paid in full, paid partially or reduced to zero. To make the text easier to read, these claims and their beneficiaries are referred to in this subsection as having "at least one week worked while on claim" even if the week or weeks of work were partial (for example, 2 days of work).

Number of Employment Insurance regular claims and claimants working while on claim

The use of the WWC provision is reported using 2 different but complementary approaches. The first approach is based on EI claimants who had an open regular claim during the reporting fiscal year, regardless of when their claim was established. This focuses on the WWC activities in the fiscal year under review and therefore better reflects the labour market conditions during the reporting period. The second approach is based on regular claims completed in the reporting fiscal year. This provides a better estimate of the relative incidence of WWC as it takes into consideration the entire duration of the claim and not only a specific period (such as the reporting fiscal year, as done under the first approach).

Of all EI regular benefit claimants who had an open claim in 2023‑24, around 648,600 (37.6% of total) worked at least one week while on claim during the fiscal year (consult Table 32). This share was lower than the levels recorded before the COVID‑19 pandemic (43.0% on average in 2018‑19 and 2019‑20) and in 2022‑23 (39.9%). The decrease in the share of claimants who worked at least one week while on claim was observed in almost all industries in 2023‑24. This may be attributed to the decline in job vacancies across all industries in 2023‑24 compared to the previous fiscal year that indicates decrease in labour market tightness in Canada.Footnote 51 In comparison, based on the second approach, 44.3% of all completed EI regular claims (close to 595,300) included at least one week worked while on claim in 2023‑24 which is also lower than the previous fiscal year (47.9%) (consult Annex 2.24.4).

Table 32 – Number and share of Employment Insurance regular benefit claimants with an open claim working at least one week while on claim, and of completed EI regular claims with at least one week worked while on claim, by region, gender, age and seasonality,* Canada, 2023‑24
Category Number of claimants with an open claim during the fiscal year who have worked at least one week while on claim in 2023‑24 Share (%) of claimants with an open claim during the fiscal year who have worked at least one week while on claim in 2023‑24 NumberP of completed claims with at least one week worked while on claim ShareP (%) of completed claims with at least one week worked while on claim
Newfoundland and Labrador 35,491 49.8% 32,710 54.7%
Prince Edward Island 7,348 41.1% 6,936 46.2%
Nova Scotia 28,512 42.7% 26,297 48.1%
New Brunswick 35,818 47.6% 33,172 53.0%
Quebec 217,478 45.0% 200,254 50.9%
Ontario 167,113 31.1% 153,161 37.9%
Manitoba 18,517 32.7% 16,974 39.3%
Saskatchewan 14,990 32.5% 13,690 38.7%
Alberta 57,061 31.9% 51,678 39.3%
British Columbia 64,967 35.0% 59,193 42.2%
Territories 1,349 25.4% 1,186 31.1%
Men 370,538 35.4% 339,869 41.9%
Women 278,106 41.0% 255,382 47.9%
24 years old and under 53,632 33.1% 50,612 40.5%
25 to 44 years old 311,989 38.8% 288,242 46.5%
45 to 54 years old 147,955 45.6% 136,805 53.1%
55 years old and over 135,068 31.1% 119,592 35.0%
Seasonal n/a n/a 209,264 53.7%
Non-seasonal n/a n/a 385,987 40.4%
Canada 648,644 37.6% 595,251 44.3%
  • Note: Includes claimants (or completed claims) to which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Claimants are not categorized according to seasonality given that the seasonal status is determined at the claims level. Therefore, no results for claimants are reported.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • Consult Annex 2.24 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Based on the first approach examining EI regular benefit claimants with an open claim in 2023‑24 who worked at least one week while on claim, more than half (58.8%) had deferred at least one week of EI benefits. Men, claimants who were from the Atlantic provinces, and older claimants (aged 55 years and over) were more likely to defer weeks of their EI benefits.

The proportion of regular benefit claimants with an open claim who worked at least one week while on claim varies by, among other things, region and industry, which may be partly explained by local labour market conditions in the regions where the claimants resided. Generally, regions that have a higher proportion of seasonal claimants have greater shares of EI regular benefit claimants who worked at least one week while on claim. This may be due in part to seasonal claimants that tend to return to work before their benefit period is exhausted. For example, in 2023‑24, the Atlantic provinces (46.4%) and Quebec (45.0%) had relatively higher share of claimants who worked at least one week while on claim (consult Table 32). In terms of industry, the Educational services industry (58.7%), as well as the Construction industry (43.3%), which had higher proportions of seasonal claimants, had the highest share of claimants who worked at least one week while on claim (consult Chart 19). Similar outcomes are found for completed claims when the second approach is examined.

Chart 19 – Share of Employment Insurance regular benefit claimants with an open claim working at least one week while on claim by industry, Canada, 2023‑24
Chart 19: description follows
Text description for Chart 19
Industry Share of Employment Insurance regular benefit claimants with an open claim working at least one week while on claim
Good-producing industries 40.7%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 35.7%
Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 37.7%
Utilities 37.4%
Construction 43.3%
Manufacturing 37.4%
Services-producing industries 36.1%
Wholesale and retail trade 25.7%
Transportation and warehousing 37.5%
Finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing 22.0%
Professional, scientific and technical services 30.7%
Business, building and other support services* 27.8%
Educational services 58.7%
Health care and social assistance 37.7%
Information, culture and recreation** 28.3%
Accommodation and food services 34.2%
Other services (excluding public administration) 31.2%
Public administration 33.1%
All industries 37.6%
  • Note: Includes claimants to which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * This industry sector comprises the industries with codes 55 (Management of companies and enterprises) and 56 (Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services).
  • ** This industry sector comprises the industries with codes 51 (Information and cultural industries) and 71 (Arts, entertainment and recreation).
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Weeks worked while on claim

This subsection analyzes the proportion and the average number of weeks worked while on claim. It examines whether employment income was reported during a week in which a claimant was entitled to receive EI regular benefits.

The first reported measure is the proportion of weeks worked while on claim among weeks for which claimants were entitled to receive EI regular benefits in the reporting fiscal year (regardless of the establishment date of the claim). It reflects the relative frequency of WWC usage among regular benefit claimants and is indicative of local labour market conditions during the reporting period. The proportion of weeks worked while on claim was 21.3% nationally in 2023‑24, lower than the levels observed in the previous fiscal year (24.0%) and in fiscal years before the pandemic (23.8% on average in 2018‑19 and 2019‑20) (consult Table 33).

Table 33 – Proportion of weeks worked while on claim among weeks for which claimants were entitled to receive EI regular benefits, by region, gender, age and seasonality, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category Proportion of weeks of entitlement worked* in 2022‑23 Proportion of weeks of entitlement worked* in 2023‑24 Change in proportion of weeks of entitlement worked* (% points)
Newfoundland and Labrador 28.6% 27.0% -1.5
Prince Edward Island 23.4% 22.7% -0.8
Nova Scotia 26.2% 24.4% -1.9
New Brunswick 30.6% 29.4% -1.2
Quebec 33.2% 31.1% -2.1
Ontario 17.9% 14.2% -3.7
Manitoba 12.3% 11.2% -1.2
Saskatchewan 13.4% 11.9% -1.6
Alberta 14.6% 12.8% -1.8
British Columbia 18.2% 15.2% -3.0
Territories 7.7% 6.7% -1.0
Men 23.6% 21.2% -2.4
Women 24.7% 21.3% -3.4
24 years old and under 20.1% 17.9% -2.2
25 to 44 years old 25.1% 21.8% -3.3
45 to 54 years old 30.6% 27.4% -3.2
55 years old and over 19.3% 17.3% -2.0
Seasonal 31.1% 29.7% -1.4
Non-seasonal 21.0% 17.6% -3.4
Canada 24.0% 21.3% -2.7
  • Note: Changes in percentage points are based on unrounded numbers. Includes all claims for which at least $1 in EI regular benefit was paid.
  • * Data are based on weeks worked while on claim during the reporting fiscal year, regardless of the year in which their claim was established.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

An analysis by demographic characteristics shows that the proportion of weeks worked while on claim generally varied in the same way as the proportion of claimants who worked at least one week while on claim. Seasonal claimants, claimants aged 45 to 54 years, and those in the Atlantic provinces and Quebec had higher proportions of weeks worked while on claim as well as proportions of claimants who worked at least one week while on claim than the national average in 2023‑24 (consult Table 32 and Table 33). This trend has been generally consistent with previous years.

The second measure is the average number of weeks worked while on claim for EI regular claims completed during the fiscal year with at least one week of work during the entire claim period. This measure of WWC frequency is based on the entire duration of the claim, rather than a specific reference period. In 2023‑24, the average number of weeks worked while on claim was 10.3 weeks, down from 11.2 weeks recorded in the previous fiscal year (consult Table 34). It was also slightly lower than those observed in the fiscal years before the pandemic (consult Annex 2.24.2). The average number of weeks worked while on claim generally varied the same way across demographic characteristics than the proportion of weeks worked while on claim.

Table 34 – Average number of weeks worked while on claim for EI regular claims completed with at least one week of work, by region, gender, age and seasonality, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category Average number of weeks worked in 2022‑23R Average number of weeks worked in 2023‑24P Change in average number of weeks worked (# of weeks)
Newfoundland and Labrador 17.2 17.1 0.0
Prince Edward Island 12.2 13.4 +1.2
Nova Scotia 14.2 13.3 -0.8
New Brunswick 15.8 16.2 +0.4
Quebec 13.3 12.5 -0.8
Ontario 8.7 7.2 -1.4
Manitoba 6.4 5.6 -0.9
Saskatchewan 7.6 6.7 -0.9
Alberta 7.9 6.6 -1.3
British Columbia 8.0 7.0 -0.9
Territories 5.4 4.6 -0.7
Men 12.0 11.4 -0.6
Women 10.2 8.7 -1.5
24 years old and under 8.1 7.9 -0.2
25 to 44 years old 10.3 9.4 -1.0
45 to 54 years old 12.6 11.3 -1.3
55 years old and over 13.1 12.2 -0.9
Seasonal 13.5 12.4 -1.1
Non-seasonal 10.3 9.1 -1.2
Canada 11.2 10.3 -0.9
  • Note: Changes are based on unrounded numbers. Includes completed claims for which at least $1 in EI regular benefit was paid.
  • p Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Consult Annex 2.24.2 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Weekly income associated with working while on claim

As outlined in Table 35, there is a difference between the average weekly income of claimants who worked while on claim and those who did not. For EI regular claims completed in 2023‑24, claimants who worked while on claim had lower average weekly EI regular benefits ($387) for the entire claim period compared to the average weekly EI regular benefit of those who did not work while on claim ($526). However, claimants who worked while on claim had significantly higher average weekly total income ($775) compared to that of those who did not work while on claim ($526). When only the weeks worked were considered, claimants who worked while on claim received an average of $935 per week in 2023‑24.

Table 35 – Average weekly income associated with completed EI regular claims by working while on claim status, Canada, 2023‑24
Income type Claims without working while on claim Claims with working while on claim (all weeks*) Claims with working while on claim (weeks worked only**)
Average weekly EI regular benefits $526 $387 Not available
Average weekly employment earnings Not applicable $389 $935
Average weekly total income (EI regular benefits and employment earnings) $526 $775 Not available
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid.
  • * Includes deferred weeks of EI benefits (that have thus $0 of EI benefits paid and high amount of employment earnings). Average incomes for this category are the sum of all regular benefits paid and/or employment earnings divided by the number of weeks the claim was active.
  • ** The average weekly employment earnings for this category are total employment earnings divided by the number of weeks worked while on claim.
  • Consult Annex 2.24.3 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

2.3 Employment Insurance support while on training

In this section

To be entitled to EI regular benefits, claimants must show that they are unemployed, able and willing to work and actively looking for suitable employment. However, EI program flexibilities allow unemployed EI claimants to pursue training and get the skills they need to succeed in the labour market in specific scenarios.

An EI regular benefits claimant may be referred to training by a designated authority, such as a province, territory, Indigenous organization, or Service Canada, under Section 25 of the Employment Insurance Act. With a Section 25 referral from a designated authority, claimants continue to receive EI regular benefits while they upgrade their skills. Otherwise, the training could be considered to restrict their ability to meet program requirements on entitlement to regular benefits (that is, searching and being available for work).

Referred claimants may have their training funded through provincial and territorial Labour Market Development Agreements (LMDAs), or the training may be self‑funded. In the case that the Section 25 referral is issued by a provincial or territorial government or Indigenous organization, it must be agreed that the training is a reasonable part of the claimant's return‑to‑work plan. Consult Chapter 3 for more information on LMDAs.

Additionally, under Skills Boost, EI regular claimants who are long‑tenured workers and wish to self‑fund full‑time training at an approved institutionFootnote 52 may directly request permission from Service Canada in order to continue receiving EI regular benefits while taking training.Footnote 53

Without a Section 25 referral in place from a designated authority, EI regular benefits claimants who decide on their own to take training can continue to receive EI support, provided they declare the training to Service Canada and prove they are ready, willing and capable of working each day they are on training and that they are actively looking for work during this period. These claimants must be ready to work if they receive a job offer and must be willing to adjust or cancel their training plan if necessary. Service Canada assesses these situations on a case‑by‑case basis, taking into account the individual claimant's circumstances.

In 2023‑24, a total of 114,200 claims established received at least $1 of EI regular benefits while on training.

Subsection 2.3.1 examines support for apprentices while subsection 2.3.2 addresses the training permission provided by Service Canada.

2.3.1 Employment Insurance support for apprentices

For many skilled trades, apprenticeship provides the skills and experience necessary for certification and full participation in the labour market. In Canada, apprenticeship is industry‑driven learning that combines on‑the‑job and technical training. Each province or territory is responsible for the system of apprenticeship training within its jurisdiction. As a result, apprenticeship programs in Canada, including the duration and delivery method of technical training, vary across trades and across provinces and territories.

In Quebec, for instance, apprentices typically complete all of their technical training at a college (CEGEP) or training institution before starting their on‑the‑job training. In the rest of Canada, most apprentices start with on‑the‑job training, which is combined with technical training through various approaches. Most often, technical training takes place through in‑class learning at an approved training provider, such as a public college or polytechnic, or a union training centre. This is commonly known as block‑release training. Less commonly, technical training may be delivered via self‑learning, distance learning, night classes, or day release programs.

In most jurisdictions and trades, prospective apprentices must be at least 16 years old and have successfully completed Grade 12 or an equivalent to enter an apprenticeship program. Generally, an apprenticeship begins when a prospective apprentice is hired by an employer who agrees, through an apprenticeship agreement, to sponsor and train them under the guidance of a qualified mentor.

To help EI contributors continue their apprenticeship and become certified journeypersons or tradespeople, the EI program provides temporary income support to those who are unemployed and attending full‑time block‑release technical training. To qualify, individuals must meet the eligibility requirements for EI regular benefitsFootnote 54, and they must have been referred to training by their respective province, territory or Indigenous organization under Section 25 of the Employment Insurance Act. Furthermore, they must be referred for each block of full‑time technical training that is required as part of their apprenticeship. Employers may also provide their apprentices with Supplemental Unemployment Benefit (SUB) plans to increase their weekly income during their periods of technical training, offering up to 95% of the apprentice's normal weekly earnings.Footnote 55

There are a number of existing flexibilities in the EI program to support apprentices' access to benefits. For example, they can apply for EI benefits up to 7 days before their last day of work and are only required to serve a single waiting period for the entire duration of their apprenticeship, even if it includes multiple blocks of full‑time technical training over multiple years, as long as they remain in the same apprenticeship program. Apprentices can also request to be exempt from submitting bi-weekly reports to Service Canada while receiving EI and attending full-time technical training. If they choose to be exempt from submitting reports and work or have earnings, they must subsequently contact Service Canada to report the work and earnings.

To ensure that apprentices receive EI benefits without delay while attending full‑time technical training, it is the responsibility of the province, territory or Indigenous organization referring them for their apprenticeship training to provide them with a special reference code for each block of full‑time technical training. This code facilitates faster processing and payment of their EI benefits.

Apprentices may also be entitled to receive financial support under Part II of the Employment Insurance Act.Footnote 56 This support is provided by the provinces and territories (under the Labour Market Development Agreements) and Indigenous organizations (under the Indigenous Skills and Employment Training Program). These benefits help cover accommodation, childcare, transportation and other costs incurred while attending technical training. Additional financial support from the Government of Canada is also available through programs such as the Canada Apprentice Loan and various apprenticeship grants.

This subsection presents detailed statistics on the number of EI claims from apprentices, their weekly benefit rate and the duration of their benefits. EI claims from apprentices are those referred under Section 25 of the Employment Insurance Act, and who received at least $1 of EI regular benefits during a period of full‑time apprenticeship training.

Employment Insurance claims from apprentices and amount paid

In 2023‑24, there were approximately 52,400 new EI claims established by apprentices, an increase from the total reported in 2022‑23 (consult Table 36). This is in line with an increase in enrollment in apprenticeship programs during the same period. Across Canada, excluding Alberta, there were close to 70,500 new registrations in apprenticeship programs in 2023, an increase of 8.0% from 2022 and higher than pre-pandemic levels reported in 2019.Footnote 57,Footnote 58 In addition, there were approximately 42,000 certifications in trades issued in 2023, an increase of 3.0% from 2022, but still below pre-pandemic levels.

Table 36 – Employment Insurance claims from apprentices and amount paid by region, gender and age, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ millions) 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 900 963 $7.3 $9.0
Prince Edward Island 260 368 $1.3 $2.4
Nova Scotia 1,280 1,513 $6.9 $9.3
New Brunswick 1,330 1,554 $7.7 $9.8
Quebec* 110 87 $1.0 $0.7
Ontario 16,520 18,340 $101.8 $123.6
Manitoba 2,440 2,656 $14.4 $16.9
Saskatchewan 2,430 2,591 $13.7 $15.0
Alberta 11,710 13,762 $73.9 $90.6
British Columbia 9,590 10,375 $53.4 $64.3
Territories 150 223 $0.9 $1.4
Men 44,100 49,372 $264.9 $321.1
Women 2,620 3,060 $17.4 $22.1
24 years old and under 20,100 22,952 $109.7 $135.0
25 to 44 years old 25,150 27,802 $162.1 $194.9
45 years old and over 1,470 1,678 $10.5 $13.3
Canada 46,720 52,432 $282.3 $343.2
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims from apprentices referred under Section 25 of the Employment Insurance Act for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid while the claimant was on training.
  • * The low number of claims from apprentices in Quebec is due to the unique program design in which apprentices complete all of their technical training prior to beginning on‑the‑job training.
  • Consult Annex 2.25 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

As in previous years, the majority of these claims were established by claims from Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia, with these 3 provinces accounting for 81.0% of the total in 2023‑24. Men also established the vast majority of claims by apprentices (94.2%) during this period. This is reflected by the fact that women represent a low share of the total apprenticeship registrations among major trade groups (12.2% in 2023).Footnote 59

Among age groups, claimants aged between 25 and 44 years accounted for the largest share of EI claims established by apprentices (53.0%), followed by claimants aged between 15 and 24 years (43.8%). Claimants aged 45 years and over accounted for 44.2% of all EI regular claims established, but only 3.2% of all EI apprenticeship claims in 2023‑24.

The total amount of EI benefits paid to apprentices reached $343.2 million in 2023‑24. Almost all regions had an increase in the amount paid in benefits to apprentices compared to 2022‑23, with the exception of Quebec.

From an industry perspective, claimants from the Construction sector established the majority of new apprentice claims (63.0%) in 2023‑24, similar to previous years (consult Table 37). Among occupational groupings, the majority of EI claims established by apprentices were associated with the Technical trades and transportation officers and controllers groupingFootnote 60 (91.4%).

Table 37 – Employment Insurance claims from apprentices and amount paid by sector and occupational grouping, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ millions) 2023‑24
Construction 28,650 33,047 $183.1 $227.6
Manufacturing 3,320 3,702 $19.1 $23.6
Wholesale and retail trade 5,600 5,989 $28.0 $31.8
Other services (excluding public administration) 3,490 3,733 $17.1 $19.9
Other sectors 5,660 5,961 $35.0 $40.3
Technical trades and transportation officers and controllers 42,670 47,902 $256.3 $310.2
Other occupations 4,050 4,530 $26.1 $33.0
Canada 46,720 52,432 $282.3 $343.2
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims from apprentices referred under Section 25 of the Employment Insurance Act for which at least $1 of EI regular benefits was paid while the claimant was on training.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

Outside of periods of full‑time training and during the benefit period of a claim, an apprentice may experience a loss of employment income due to circumstances that may require access to other types of EI benefits, such as regular benefits for lack of available work or special benefits for the care of a newborn child or other life events. The apprentice may access these benefits if they meet the eligibility requirements for the relevant EI benefits. Of all claims established by apprentices in 2023‑24, 28.7% (or approximately 15,100 claims) contained at least 1 week of regular benefits paid outside of periods of full‑time training. Additionally, 1.4% (or approximately 740 claims) contained at least 1 week of special benefits paid outside of period of full‑time training, including approximately 440 claims for sickness benefits.

Of the total $343.2 million paid in benefits to apprentices in 2023‑24, $265.6 million (or 77.4% of all EI benefits paid to apprentices) were paid while apprentices attended full‑time technical training. EI regular benefits paid outside of periods of training accounted for most of the remaining benefits ($68.4 million, or 19.9%), while a small portion was paid as special benefits ($9.2 million, or 2.7%).

Level and duration of Employment Insurance benefits for apprentices

The average weekly benefit rate for claims established by apprentices was $598 in 2023‑24. This was higher than the average weekly benefit rate for EI regular claims established during the same period ($561). Apprentice claimants from the Territories and Alberta had the highest average weekly benefit rate in the country ($619 and $609, respectively). By gender, men received a higher average weekly benefit rate ($600) than women ($571), while among age groups, claimants aged between 25 and 44 years received the highest average weekly benefit rate ($611), followed closely by those aged 45 years and over ($610) (consult Annex 2.25.3).

The average duration of EI regular claims completed in 2023‑24 by claimants while on full‑time technical training was 8.9 weeks. Outside of Quebec, claims established in Prince Edward Island had the highest average duration (9.5 weeks), while claims established in New Brunswick had the lowest (8.3 weeks). There were no significant differences in the average duration across genders and age groups in 2023‑24 (consult Annex 2.25.2).

2.3.2 Training with permission from Service Canada to keep receiving Employment Insurance benefits

Under Skills Boost, claimants who are long‑tenured workersFootnote 61 and wish to self‑fund full-time training at an approved institution may request permission directly from Service Canada to continue receiving EI regular benefits during training. Without this permission, the training could restrict their ability to meet program requirements (that is, searching and being available for work). Service Canada does not offer services normally provided by the provinces and territories, such as employment counselling, job search assistance, needs assessments and help with developing return‑to‑work plans. Claimants must identify their preferred full-time training program before requesting permission from Service Canada to continue receiving EI regular benefits while attending training.

Employment Insurance claims under Skills Boost and amount paid

In 2023‑24, Service Canada gave permission to (or "referred") approximately 780 claimants to continue receiving EI benefits while training under Skills Boost (consult Table 38). This marks the highest total since the 2019‑20 reporting year (consult Annex 2.26.1). Among all claims established under Skills Boost in 2023‑24, approximately 730 (93.9%) claims contained at least 1 week of EI regular benefits paid while on training, and just under 550 (70.3%) claims contained at least 1 week of EI regular benefits paid outside of training periods.

Table 38 – Employment Insurance claims during which claimants received permission from Service Canada to train, and amount paid by region, gender, age and industry, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ millions) 2023‑24
Atlantic provinces 56 67 $0.7 $0.9
Quebec 140 208 $1.6 $2.8
Ontario 182 206 $2.2 $2.9
Manitoba 28 33 $0.4 $0.4
Saskatchewan 22 30 $0.3 $0.4
Alberta 115 121 $1.5 $1.6
British Columbia and Territories1 84 116 $1.1 $1.5
Men 307 412 $3.7 $5.6
Women 320 369 $4.1 $5.0
34 years old and under 247 291 $2.8 $3.6
35 to 44 years old 227 261 $2.9 $3.7
45 to 54 years old 115 183 $1.5 $2.6
55 years old and over 38 46 $0.5 $0.6
Goods-producing industries 178 228 $2.2 $3.0
Agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 17 33 $0.2 $0.4
Construction 90 105 $1.0 $1.3
Manufacturing2 71 90 $0.9 $1.3
Services-producing industries 428 541 $5.3 $7.3
Wholesale and retail trade 70 85 $0.9 $1.2
Transportation and warehousing 22 33 $0.3 $0.4
Finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing 31 38 $0.4 $0.6
Professional, scientific and technical services 37 53 $0.5 $0.9
Business, building, and other support services3 48 47 $0.6 $0.6
Educational services 63 68 $0.7 $0.7
Healthcare and social assistance 48 66 $0.6 $0.9
Information, culture and recreation4 20 39 $0.2 $0.6
Accommodation and food services 25 30 $0.2 $0.4
Other services (excluding public administration) 14 29 $0.2 $0.4
Public administration 50 53 $0.6 $0.8
Unclassified industries5 21 12 $0.3 $0.2
Canada 627 781 $7.8 $10.5
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which claimants received permission from Service Canada to train.
  • 1 For confidentiality reasons, data for the Territories have been combined with those for British Columbia.
  • 2 For confidentiality reasons, data for the Utilities industry have combined with those for the Manufacturing industry.
  • 3 This industry sector comprises the industries with codes 55 (Management of companies and enterprises) and 56 (Administration and support, waste management and remediation services).
  • 4 This industry sector comprises the industries with codes 51 (Information and cultural industries) and 71 (Arts, entertainment and recreation).
  • 5 For some claims, this information was not available in the data.
  • Consult Annex 2.26 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Similar to previous years, most of the training referrals by Service Canada in 2023‑24 were in Quebec (26.6%), Ontario (26.4%) and Alberta (15.5%). Men accounted for slightly more than half of referrals (52.8%), compared to 60.3% of all EI regular claims established in 2023‑24. In terms of age, claimants aged 44 years and under established just under three-quarters (70.7%) of all referrals in 2023‑24, while accounting for 55.8% of EI regular claims during the same period.

From an industry perspective, claimants from the Construction sector accounted for the largest share of referrals (13.4%), followed by those from the Manufacturing (11.5%) and the Wholesale and retail trade (10.9%) sectors.

A total of $10.5 million in EI regular benefits were paid to claimants under Skills Boost in 2023‑24, representing the highest amount since the 2020‑21 reporting period. Of this amount, $7.0 million (66.5% of the total amount) was paid while claimants were on training, and $3.2 million (30.0% of the total amount) were paid to claimants outside of training periods.

Level and duration of Employment Insurance benefits for Skills Boost claims

Claimants who requested and received a referral to training by Service Canada had an average weekly benefit rate of $563 in 2023‑24. This is nearly identical to the average weekly benefit rate for EI regular benefits ($561), but lower than the one entitled to long‑tenured workers ($601) during the same period.

Claimants from Ontario received the highest average weekly benefit rate ($582), while claimants from Manitoba received the lowest ($488). In terms of gender, the weekly benefit rate for men was higher than for women, while among age groups, claimants aged 55 years and over received a lower average weekly benefit rate than the other age groups (consult Annex 2.26.3).

Claims with a referral to training by Service Canada that were completed in 2023‑24 received, on average, 16.7 weeks of EI benefits while on training and 10.8 weeks of EI regular benefits outside of training periods (consult Annex 2.26.2).

Claimants from the Atlantic provinces received, on average, the highest number of EI weeks while on training (20.3 weeks). In terms of gender, women received more EI weeks than men during training, while that trend was reversed outside of training periods. Among age groups, claimants aged between 35 and 44 years received, on average, the highest number of EI benefits weeks during training (17.9 weeks), while claimants aged 55 years and over received the most weeks outside of training periods (14.7 weeks).

2.4 Employment Insurance fishing benefits

In this section

Employment Insurance provides fishing benefits to qualifying, self-employed fishers who are actively seeking work. Unlike EI regular benefits, eligibility for EI fishing benefits is not based on hours of insurable employment. Rather, it is based on insurable earnings from self-employment in fishing in the qualifying period.Footnote 62 In addition to fishing benefits, self-employed fishers may also be eligible to receive sickness, maternity, parental, compassionate care and family caregiver benefits.

Under the Employment Insurance (Fishing) Regulations, a "fisher" is defined as a self-employed person engaged in fishing and includes a person engaged, other than under a contract of service or for their own or another person's sport, in any of the following:

  • making a catch
  • doing any work incidental to making or handling a catchFootnote 63
  • the construction of a fishing vessel for the person's own use or for the use of a crew of which the person is a member in making a catch

Self-employed fishers are eligible for EI fishing benefits if they do not qualify for EI regular benefits and have earned a minimum amount of insurable earnings from self-employment in fishing during their qualifying period. This amount varies between $2,500 and $4,200, depending on the unemployment rate in the claimant's EI economic region.

When not engaged in fishing-related activities, fishing claimants must demonstrate that they are capable of and available for work but unable to find suitable employment for each working day of their claim.

EI fishing benefits are available for 2 fishing seasons per year: the winter fishing season and the summer fishing season. Self-employed fishers who have established a claim for EI fishing benefits are entitled to a maximum of 26 weeks of EI fishing benefits per claim, which may be received consecutively or intermittently during the benefit period. However, they are limited by the fixed start and end dates of the benefit period.

  • For winter fishing claims, the benefit period spans from the week of April 1 to the week of December 15. In addition, the qualifying period cannot start earlier than the week of September 1
  • For summer fishing claims, the benefit period spans from the week of October 1 to the week of June 15. In addition, the qualifying period cannot start earlier than the week of March 1

In some cases, claimants can defer earnings from one season to the other. However, there is no increase in the length of the benefit period for any reason except for the payment of special benefits.

A fisher's weekly benefit rate is usually calculated by dividing their total insurable earnings from fishingFootnote 64 during the qualifying period by the divisor associated with the unemployment rate in the claimant's EI economic region (consult Table 39). The result is then multiplied by the replacement rate of 55% to determine the weekly benefit rate, which cannot exceed the maximum weekly benefit rate established for each year ($650 in 2023 and $668 in 2024).

Table 39 – Minimum threshold of insurable earnings from self-employed fishing and earnings divisor for EI fishing benefits by regional unemployment rate
Regional unemployment rate Required insurable earnings Earnings divisor
6.0% or less $4,200 22
6.1% to 7.0% $4,000 21
7.1% to 8.0% $3,800 20
8.1% to 9.0% $3,600 19
9.1% to 10.0% $3,400 18
10.1% to 11.0% $3,200 17
11.1% to 12.0% $2,900 16
12.1% to 13.0% $2,700 15
13.1% or more $2,500 14

Note: The earnings divisor is applied to the insurable earnings during the qualifying period to determine the equivalent weekly earnings that will be subject to the standard 55% replacement rate.

2.4.1 Employment Insurance fishing claims and benefits paid

The total number of new EI fishing claims decreased from 30,400 in 2022‑23 to 27,400 in 2023‑24 (consult Chart 20). This represents the lowest number since 2014‑15. Similarly, the total amount paid in EI fishing benefits went from $372.5 million in 2022‑23 to $354.9 million in 2023‑24.

Chart 20 – Employment Insurance fishing claims established and amount paid, Canada, 2014‑15 to 2023‑24
Chart 20: description follows
Text description for Chart 20
Fiscal year New claims established (thousands) Amount paid ($ millions)
2014‑15 27.6 $255.5
2015‑16 28.3 $272.3
2016‑17 28.9 $282.9
2017‑18 30.1 $300.2
2018‑19 30.4 $297.7
2019‑20 30.4 $303.1
2020‑21 28.3 $323.6
2021‑22 30.0 $354.8
2022‑23 30.4 $372.5
2023‑24 27.4 $354.9
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI fishing benefits was paid.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results for claims are based on 100% of data. Results for benefits are based on a 10% sample of data for 2014‑15 to 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

In 2023‑24, 96.0% of claims for EI fishing benefits were established by individuals who resided in 6 provinces (Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Quebec and British Columbia) (consult Table 40). Similarly, 96.3% of EI fishing benefits paid were to claimants in these provinces.

Table 40 – Employment Insurance fishing claims and amount paid by region, gender and age, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24
Region New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ millions) 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 14,408 11,953 $178.0 $159.1
Prince Edward Island 3,169 3,150 $38.0 $40.3
Nova Scotia 5,494 5,400 $68.1 $68.8
New Brunswick 3,007 2,830 $40.8 $36.6
Quebec 1,264 1,089 $13.2 $14.0
British Columbia 2,006 1,920 $21.4 $23.2
Other provinces and territories 1,099 1,095 $13.0 $13.0
Men 23,944 21,746 $295.4 $279.7
Women 6,503 5,691 $77.1 $75.2
24 years old and under 1,629 1,410 $20.4 $16.2
25 to 44 years old 8,130 7,376 $102.1 $94.2
45 to 54 years old 7,130 6,338 $82.7 $82.5
55 years old and over 13,558 12,313 $167.4 $162.0
Canada 30,447 27,437 $372.5 $354.9
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI fishing benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.10 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results for claims are based on 100% of data. Results for the amount paid are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

As outlined in Table 40, the number of new fishing claims established in 2023‑24 was lower than the previous fiscal year for all regions. The Atlantic provinces accounted for 85.0% of all fishing claims established in 2023‑24, as well as 85.9% of the amount paid in fishing benefits. More specifically, Newfoundland and Labrador continued to represent the largest share of fishing claims (43.6%) and benefits paid (44.8%) this fiscal year.

In terms of gender, men represented the largest shares of both claims established (79.3%) and total amount paid in fishing benefits (78.8%).

Among age groups, claimants aged 55 years and over represented the largest share of claims established (44.9%) and total benefits paid (45.7%) in 2023‑24. The share of fishing claims established by older claimants increased by 6.3 percentage points (p.p.) between 2017‑18 and 2023‑24, with an increase reported each year. The share of fishing benefits paid to older claimants has followed a similar trend, increasing by 7.2 p.p. over the same period.

In 2023‑24, the average weekly benefit rate for EI fishing benefits increased by 1.2% to $601, up from $594 in 2022‑23 (consult Table 41). As in previous years, this rate was above the average weekly regular benefit rate for the same reporting period ($561). Among all regions with a significant fishing industry, the average weekly benefit rate for fishing claims was the highest in Quebec ($622), followed by the Atlantic provinces ($609) and British Columbia ($529). Moreover, Quebec as well as all 4 Atlantic provinces had an average weekly benefit rate for fishing claims above the national average. Among these specific regions, Quebec had the highest increase in its average weekly benefit rate for fishing claims (+$26) from 2022‑23 to 2023‑24, while Newfoundland and Labrador was the only region that had a decrease (-$2).

Table 41 – Average weekly benefit rate for EI fishing benefits and proportion of fishing claims at the maximum weekly benefit rate by region, gender and age, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24
Region Average weekly benefit rate 2022‑23 Average weekly benefit rate 2023‑24 Proportion of claims at the maximum weekly benefit rate 2022‑23 Proportion of claims at the maximum weekly benefit rate 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador $604 $602 72.5% 62.8%
Prince Edward Island $614 $625 82.3% 80.7%
Nova Scotia $600 $610 74.3% 75.9%
New Brunswick $603 $621 75.4% 79.0%
Quebec $596 $622 69.0% 81.5%
British Columbia $518 $529 39.5% 40.2%
Other provinces and territories $479 $513 37.1% 42.4%
Men $597 $605 73.6% 70.8%
Women $579 $582 59.5% 54.8%
24 years old and under $574 $576 60.5% 57.4%
25 to 44 years old $590 $601 69.5% 69.2%
45 to 54 years old $602 $611 74.6% 71.8%
55 years old and over $594 $597 70.3% 65.3%
Canada $594 $601 70.5% 67.4%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI fishing benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.10 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

In terms of gender, men had a higher average weekly benefit rate for fishing claims ($605) than women ($582) in 2023‑24, while among age groups, claimants who were aged between 45 and 54 years had the highest average weekly benefit rate for fishing claims ($611).

The proportion of fishing claims that received the maximum weekly benefit rate was 67.4% in 2023‑24, compared to 70.5% in 2022‑23. Quebec had both the highest proportion of claims receiving the maximum weekly benefit rate (81.5%), and the largest increase of this proportion from the previous fiscal year, with 12.5 percentage points (p.p.). Conversely, Newfoundland and Labrador had the largest decrease of this proportion from the previous fiscal year (-9.7 p.p.). Similar to previous years, men had a higher proportion of fishing claims that received the maximum rate compared to women. Among age groups, claimants aged between 45 and 54 years had the largest proportion of claims at the maximum weekly benefit rate (consult Table 41).

2.4.2 Seasonal component of Employment Insurance fishing benefits

EI fishing benefits are available for 2 fishing seasons each year, winter and summer, allowing eligible claimants to establish multiple claims in a year.Footnote 65 In 2023‑24, approximately 19,700 fishers established at least 1 EI fishing claim, a decrease from the approximately 20,900 fishers reported in 2022‑23 (consult Table 42). Of these 19,700 fishers, 12,000 (60.9%) established a claim in only 1 season, while 7,700 (39.1%) established claims in both seasons. Among fishers who established a fishing claim in only 1 season, 3,300 established a winter claim, while 8,700 established a summer claim. The share of fishers who established a claim in only 1 season increased in 2023‑24, driven by an increase in the fishers who only established a summer fishing claim, while the share of those establishing claims in both seasons decreased.

Table 42 – Number of fishers by season of establishment of claim, Canada, 2019‑20 to 2023‑24
Season of establishment 2019‑20 2020‑21 2021‑22 2022‑23 2023‑24
1 season 12,054 11,663 11,408 11,431 12,021
Winter 3,192 2,624 3,030 3,472 3,309
Summer 8,862 9,039 8,378 7,959 8,712
Both seasons 9,162 8,307 9,252 9,506 7,706
Canada 21,216 19,970 20,660 20,937 19,727
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

In 2023‑24, fishers who established 1 fishing claim received an average of $13,191 in EI fishing benefits, similar to the amount reported in 2022‑23. Those who established 2 fishing claims received, on average, $12,670 for their first claim and $11,426 for their second claim, adding up to a total average of $24,096 received in EI fishing benefits in 2023‑24. This represents a decrease from the amount reported in 2022‑23.

2.4.3 Duration of Employment Insurance fishing benefits

The maximum entitlement of a claim established for EI fishing benefits is 26 weeks, regardless of the labour market conditions in the claimant's region of residence.

The average duration of fishing claims decreased from 22.1 weeks in 2022‑23 to 21.2 weeks in 2023‑24. Among regions with a significant fishing industry, British Columbia had the highest average duration of fishing benefits in 2023‑24, with 22.8 weeks. At the other end, claims established in Quebec had the lowest average duration (20.5 weeks), while those established in the Atlantic Provinces had an average duration of 21.0 weeks.

The lower average duration of claims in the Atlantic Provinces and Quebec compared to British Columbia may be attributable, in part, to a higher proportion of fishers in the Atlantic provinces and Quebec who establish 2 claims for fishing benefits per year compared to British Columbia. Over the past 5 years, on average, 49.2% of fishers in the Atlantic Provinces and 62.2% of fishers in Quebec established 2 claims per year, compared to 2.4% for British Columbia.

Table 43 outlines the average duration of fishing benefits. In 2023‑24, fishers who established a single fishing claim received benefits for an average of 23.2 weeks, a duration nearly unchanged from 2022‑23. Fishers who established multiple claims received benefits for an average of 20.6 weeks for their first claim and 18.5 weeks for their second claim, totaling an average of 39.1 weeks for the entire 2023‑24 fiscal year. These durations decreased from the previous fiscal year: down 1.5 weeks (-6.7%) for the first claim, 2.1 weeks (-10.3%) for the second claim, and 3.6 weeks (-8.4%) overall.

Table 43 – Average duration of Employment Insurance fishing benefits by number of claims established per fiscal year, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24
Number of claims established during the fiscal year 2022‑23 2023‑24 Change (%) 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
1 claim 23.3 23.2 -0.4%
2 claims 42.7 39.1 -8.4%
First claim 22.1 20.6 -6.7%
Second claim 20.7 18.5 -10.3%
  • Note: Percentage change is based on unrounded numbers.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

2.5 Employment Insurance Work‑Sharing benefits

In this section

The EI Work-Sharing program is designed to help avoid layoffs of all or a number of a firm's employees when there is a temporary decrease in the normal level of the business activities whether due to an economic downturn, a disaster event, or another shock that is beyond the control of the employer.

Layoffs are avoided by offering EI Work-Sharing benefits to eligible workers who accept to work a temporarily reduced workweek while their employer recovers. The goal of the program is for all participating employees to return to normal working hours by the end of the Work-Sharing agreement. The employer and the employees must agree to participate in a Work-Sharing agreement.

By participating in the Work-Sharing program, employers are able to retain skilled employees, thus avoiding the costly process of recruiting and training new employees once the business activities return to normal level. At the same time, participating workers can maintain their employment and skills by supplementing the reduced wages with EI Work-Sharing benefits for the days they are not working. Also, within a Work-Sharing period the employers are required to maintain all existing employee benefits. The receipt of EI Work-Sharing benefits has no impact on future eligibility for EI regular or EI special benefits. The program can also generate savings for the EI operating account by reducing the time and extent to which participating employees collect EI regular benefits.

Work-Sharing agreements must include a reduction in work activity ranging between 10% and 60% of participating employees' regular weekly hours of work over the life of the agreement. In any given week, the work reduction can vary depending on available work. The proposed reduction in work hours corresponds to the number of anticipated temporary layoffs.

To illustrate how the program works, consider a business with 100 workers. The business is considering temporarily laying-off 60 workers during a temporary and unexpected economic downturn, due to supply chain constraints. If the 60 EI-eligible workers were laid off, they would collect EI regular benefits for every day they were unemployed, up to their maximum entitlement.

Work-Sharing allows all 100 of the business' employees to share the costs of the downturn. Rather than laying off the 60 workers, the business could reduce the workweek by up to 60% (for example, work a 2‑day week) for all 100 workers. This would allow all 100 workers to stay connected to the labour market and their employer, and thus retain their employee benefits, while avoiding skill erosion.

To be eligible for a Work-Sharing agreement, an employer must meet the following criteria:

  • have been in business in Canada year-round for at least 2 years
  • be a publicly-held company, private business or a certain type of not-for-profit organization
  • be experiencing a decrease in overall work activities of at least 10% in the last 6 months, where the reduction in business activity is caused by factors beyond its control (reductions due to cyclical shortages of work and recurring slowdowns are ineligible)
  • employ at least 2 eligible employees in the affected work unit, and
  • undertake recovery measures that will return employees to normal levels of employment upon the completion of the Work-Sharing agreement

Employees participating in a Work-Sharing agreement must:

  • be year-round, permanent, full-time or part-time employees who are required to carry out the everyday functions of the business
  • be eligible to receive EI regular benefits, that is have worked the required minimum number of hours of insurable employment in the previous 52 weeks or since the establishment of their last EI claim, whichever is shorter, and
  • agree to a reduction of their normal working hours and to share equally the available work among all members of their Work-Sharing unit over a specified period of time

An initial Work-Sharing agreement can last between a minimum of 6 and a maximum of 26 consecutive weeks. If needed, an extension may be requested of up to 12 weeks, bringing the initial agreement to a maximum total of 38 weeks. There is a mandatory cooling-off period between successive agreements equal to the number of weeks of the first Work-Sharing agreement (up to a maximum period of 38 weeks).

During participation in a Work-Sharing agreement, employer-initiated training activities may take place. Training costs may be funded by the employer or through other available supports, such as provincial or territorial programming.

Training can take place during the non-working hours for which the participating employees are in receipt of EI Work-Sharing benefits. The salary costs of employees taking part in training activities during normally-scheduled working hours cannot be compensated through the Work-Sharing agreement.

The program is not meant to provide full coverage of hours of insurable employment or insurable earnings. As a result, the data reported on Work-Sharing claims are not directly comparable to other types of EI benefits. This is particularly true of the weekly benefit rates paid to claimants, which are meant to only cover 10% to 60% of a regular work week for affected employees in a work unit subject to a Work-Sharing agreement, depending on the agreed upon decrease in work levels. Because of this, the weekly Work-Sharing benefit rates are lower on average than for other types of EI benefits. Because the weekly Work-Sharing benefit rate is determined by employees' wage and the degree of reductions in the hours worked (between 10% and 60%), significant variability is also observed across industries in the reported weekly benefit rates.

The Canada Employment Insurance Commission (CEIC) may introduce temporary special measures to provide additional support for affected employers and employees during a period of economic downturn, natural disaster, or emergency. Typically, temporary special measures have involved easing eligibility requirements for employers, extending the maximum duration of Work-Sharing and removing the requirement to serve a mandatory cooling-off period between successive applications.

Work-Sharing temporary special measures in effect during the reporting period

To support businesses affected by the 2023 wildfires that occurred in multiple regions across Canada, the Government of Canada put in place Work-Sharing temporary special measures. Employers that experienced a decline in business activity attributable to the wildfires could be eligible to Work‑Sharing temporary special measures if they were located in the affected areas or had major customers or suppliers located in the affected areas.

Effective June 25, 2023 to November 4, 2023, these temporary special measures provided a duration between 6 weeks and 26 weeks, with a 12-week extension if required, to a maximum total duration of 38 weeks in communities across Canada.

For the purpose of this section, EI Work-Sharing claims refers to any claims for which at least $1 of EI Work-Sharing benefits was paid.

2.5.1. Employment Insurance Work-Sharing agreements

The number of Work-Sharing agreements established in a given fiscal year increases during periods of economic shocks and uncertainty and decreases during periods of economic growth and stability. This countercyclical pattern can be observed by looking at the number of Work-Sharing agreements established in Canada over the past few years, notably the high demand for the Work‑Sharing program in 2020‑21 during the economic downturn due to the COVID‑19 pandemic.

The participation in the Work-Sharing program increased to 683 agreements in 2023‑24, compared to 503 in 2022‑23 (consult Chart 21). This increase is explained by the Canadian economy experiencing a slowdown in its growth. As a result of Work-Sharing agreements, an estimated minimum of 8,894 layoffs were averted in 2023‑24.Footnote 66

Chart 21 – Total count of Work-Sharing agreements, Canada, 2012‑13 to 2023‑24
Chart 21: description follows
Text description for Chart 21
Fiscal year Agreements
2012-13 830
2013-14 649
2014-15 411
2015-16 917
2016-17 862
2017-18 198
2018-19 158
2019-20 370
2020-21 4,224
2021-22 886
2022-23 503
2023-24 683

Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Common System of Grants and Contributions.

Across the country, in absolute terms, Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia and Manitoba had the most agreements in 2023‑24 (consult Table 44). The number of agreements increased in all provinces, except for Saskatchewan and Alberta. In addition, there was no Work-Sharing agreement for the third consecutive year in the Territories. In 2023‑24, almost 75% of Work-Sharing agreements were in goods-producing industries, compared to just under 25% of agreements in the services-producing industries. The share of Work‑Sharing agreements in the goods-producing industries continued its increase from previous fiscal years and returned to pre-pandemic level. The Manufacturing industry (68.5%) continued to account for the largest share of the agreements in 2023‑24.

Table 44 – Number of Work-Sharing agreements by region and industry, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category 2022‑23 2023‑24
Atlantic provinces 11 14
Quebec 190 318
Ontario 200 226
Manitoba 14 29
Saskatchewan 8 7
Alberta 34 18
British Columbia 46 71
Territories 0 0
Goods-producing industries 336 504
Construction 26 29
Manufacturing 302 468
Rest of goods-producing industries 8 7
Services-producing industries 137 169
Wholesale and retail trade 23 51
Professional, scientific and technical services 45 49
Rest of services-producing industries 69 69
Unclassified industries 30 10
Canada 503 683

Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Common System of Grants and Contributions.

When assessed by firm size, small-sized enterprises (with fewer than 50 employees) comprised 72.6% of all Work-Sharing agreements in the fiscal year examined, down from 78.1% reported in the previous fiscal year. Small-to-medium sized enterprises (50 to 99 employees) represented 14.3% of all Work‑Sharing agreements in 2023‑24. Combined, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) with fewer than 500 employees accounted for almost all Work-Sharing agreements in 2023‑24 and in previous fiscal years. This high representation of small and medium-sized businesses in the Work-Sharing program has been a consistent feature of the program since 2008-09, as Work-Sharing agreements have been primarily initiated to assist SMEs in recovering from economic shocks to their normal levels of business activity.

2.5.2 Employment Insurance Work-Sharing claims and amount paid

As with the number of Work-Sharing agreements, the total number of Work-Sharing claims established and the total amount paid in Work-Sharing benefits also follow a countercyclical pattern: they increase during labour market contraction and economic uncertainties, and decrease during periods of economic expansion.

In 2023‑24, the number of claims for Work-Sharing benefits increased. There were 17,500 claims for Work-Sharing benefits established in 2023‑24, compared to approximately 10,000 claims established in the previous fiscal year (consult Chart 22). The amount of Work-Sharing benefits paid increased from $30.6 million in 2022‑23 to $39.5 million in 2023‑24.

Chart 22 – Employment Insurance Work-Sharing claims and benefits paid, Canada, 2019‑20 to 2023‑24
Chart 22: description follows
Text description for Chart 22
Fiscal year New claims established Amount paid ($ million)
2019-20 11,046 16.5
2020-21* 82,991 183.5
2021-22* 15,078 88.8
2022-23* 9,959 30.6
2023-24 17,529 39.5
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of Employment Insurance (EI) Work-Sharing benefits was paid.
  • * The eligibility criteria for EI regular benefits varied over the fiscal years depending on when claims were established. Therefore, comparison between fiscal years should be done with caution.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Employment Insurance Work-Sharing claims and amount paid, by region, gender, age and industry

As outlined in Table 45, compared to 2022‑23, the most notable increase in the number of Work-Sharing claims in 2023‑24 was in Quebec (+4,849 claims), followed by Ontario (+1,856 claims). The number of claims established only decreased in 2 provinces: Alberta (‑26 claims) and Manitoba (‑2 claims). Claimants from Quebec established the largest share of total new claims (48.6%), followed by claimants from Ontario (32.8%) in 2023‑24. The same trend can be observed in terms of amount paid, claims established in Quebec received the largest share of total amount paid with 48.2%, followed by claims established in Ontario (34.4%) in 2023‑24. There were no claims established in the Territories during the reporting period.

Table 45 – Number of Employment Insurance Work-Sharing claims and amount paid, by region, gender, age and industry, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ thousands) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ thousands) 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 15 60 C $64.8 $37.0
Prince Edward Island 40 60 C $34.6 $139.5
Nova Scotia 39C 89 $245.4 $324.7
New Brunswick 39C 64 $73.5 $35.8
Quebec 3,666 8,515 $8,662.7 $19,045.6
Ontario 3,900 5,756 $14,985.7 $13,583.1
Manitoba 1,354 1,352 $1,376.5 $1,933.6
Saskatchewan 39 107 $631.5 $234.8
Alberta 334 308 $1,407.3 $831.0
British Columbia 572 1,278 $3,142.1 $3,371.9
Territories 0 0 $2.1 $0.0
Men 6,532 11,397 $20,306.6 $26,105.4
Women 3,427 6,132 $10,319.7 $13,431.6
24 years old and under 731 1,025 $1,529.5 $1,798.1
25 to 44 years old 3,519 6,694 $10,036.8 $13,824.6
45 to 54 years old 2,439 4,240 $8,060.2 $9,999.6
55 years old and over 3,270 5,570 $10,999.7 $13,914.7
Goods-producing industries 8,658 15,871 $23,254.3 $34,650.5
Manufacturing 8,410 15,522 $22,519.2 $33,488.9
Rest of goods-producing industries 248 349 $735.1 $1,161.5
Services-producing industries 1,192 1,623 $7,041.0 $4,776.8
Wholesale and retail trade 445 768 $2,064.5 $1,917.2
Professional, scientific and technical services 294 338 $1,197.4 $1,303.4
Rest of services-producing industries 453 517 $3,779.1 $1,556.2
Unclassified industries* 109 35 $331.0 $109.7
Canada 9,959 17,529 $30,626.3 $39,537.0
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of Employment Insurance (EI) Work-Sharing benefits was paid.
  • * For some claims, this information was not available in the data.
  • C For confidentiality purposes, data for some provinces have been combined.
  • Consult Annex 2.21 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

Men continued to be more likely to make use of the Work-Sharing program—a trend that has been persistent over the years. In 2023‑24, men accounted for 65.0% of new Work-Sharing claims and 66.0% of total benefits paid, relatively similar to 2022‑23 (65.6% and 66.3%, respectively). The age distribution of claimants in 2023‑24 remained relatively unchanged compared to the previous year, with the exception of a slight increase in the proportion of new claims established by individuals aged 25 to 44 years old (from 35.3% to 38.2%). Youth remained under-represented among newly established Work‑Sharing claims (5.8%), relative to their share of national employment (13.3% in 2023-24).Footnote 67

From an industry perspective, the Work-Sharing program was most frequently used by workers in the Manufacturing industry, which is consistent with historical patterns. They accounted for the largest share of new EI Work-Sharing claims (88.6%) established in 2023‑24, up from 84.4% in the previous fiscal year. These workers received the largest share of the total EI Work‑Sharing benefits paid (84.7%), up from 73.5% in 2022‑23.

Among the services-producing industries, workers in the Wholesale and retail trade and in the Professional, scientific and technical services industries accounted for 4.4% and 1.9% of Work-Sharing claims, respectively, in 2023‑24. In terms of amount paid, workers in the Wholesale and retail trade industry received 4.8% of total Work-Sharing benefits paid in 2023‑24, followed by workers in the Professional, scientific and technical services industry, who accounted for 3.3% of total Work-Sharing benefits paid.

2.5.3 Level and duration of Employment Insurance Work-Sharing benefits

The national average weekly Work-Sharing benefit rate increased by 6.2% to $138 in 2023‑24, up from the average weekly benefit rate of $130 in the previous fiscal year (consult Table 46).Footnote 68 It increased in all regions, except the Atlantic provinces and Alberta. Similar to the previous years, a high degree of variability can be observed among the average weekly benefit paid in each region. For example, in 2023‑24, the highest average weekly benefit rate was in British Columbia ($153), followed by Saskatchewan ($152), while the lowest was in Alberta ($111). The average weekly Work-Sharing benefit rate for men increased by 8.0% to $145, while the rate for women increased by 2.7% to $126 in 2023‑24. The average weekly benefit rate for all age groups increased; the highest average rate was observed for workers aged 25 to 54 years ($140).

Table 46 – Employment Insurance Work-Sharing average weekly benefit rate, by region, gender, age and industry, 2021‑22 to 2023‑24
Category 2021‑22* 2022‑23 2023‑24 Change (%) 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Atlantic provinces $127 $152 $126 -17.3%
Quebec $146 $139 $139 -0.1%
Ontario $138 $137 $142 +4.0%
Manitoba $142 $77 $116 +50.6%
Saskatchewan $190 $142 $152 +6.7%
Alberta $174 $138 $111 -19.8%
British Columbia $160 $152 $153 +0.4%
Territories n/a n/a n/a n/a
Men $151 $134 $145 +8.0%
Women $132 $123 $126 +2.7%
24 years old and under $142 $119 $131 +9.8%
25 to 44 years old $147 $132 $140 +5.7%
45 to 54 years old $143 $129 $140 +8.8%
55 years old and over $145 $132 $137 +3.7%
Goods-producing industries $145 $127 $137 +7.8%
Services-producing industries $141 $153 $155 +1.4%
Canada $145 $130 $138 +6.2%
  • Note: Percentage change is based on unrounded numbers. Includes claims for which at least $1 of Employment Insurance (EI) Work-Sharing benefits was paid.
  • * EI temporary measures affecting the weekly benefit rate were in effect in 2021‑22. Therefore, the results in 2021‑22 are not fully comparable to those in 2022‑23 and 2023‑24.
  • Consult Annex 2.21 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

As in previous fiscal years, the average weekly Work-Sharing benefit rate varied across industries in 2023‑24. The average weekly benefit rate in services-producing industries increased by 1.4% to $155 in 2023‑24. The average weekly Work-Sharing benefit rate increased by 7.8% to $137 in goods‑producing industries. Consult Annex 2.21.3 for detailed information on average Work-Sharing weekly benefit rate by industry.

The average duration of Work-Sharing claims completed in 2023‑24 was 17.7 weeks (consult Chart 23), reversing the upward trend from the previous fiscal years. This may be a result of the end of the Work‑Sharing special measures related to the COVID‑19 pandemic that were in effect from March 15, 2020 to September 24, 2022. These temporary measures extended the maximum duration of agreements up to 76 weeks instead of 38 weeks.

Chart 23 – Average duration of completed Employment Insurance Work-Sharing claims, 2019‑20 to 2023‑24
Chart 23: description follows
Text description for Chart 23
Fiscal year Average Work-Sharing weeks
2019-20 14.4
2020-21 11.8
2021-22 23.5
2022-23 25.6
2023-24 17.7P
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of Employment Insurance (EI) Work-Sharing benefits was paid.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • Consult Annex 2.21 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

2.5.4 Employment Insurance Work-Sharing agreements termination status

The share of Work-Sharing agreements in which firms returned to their normal level of employment remained relatively unchanged compared to the previous fiscal year (69.0% in 2022‑23 to 68.2% in 2023‑24).

A Work-Sharing agreement may also end before the anticipated end date—this is referred to as early termination. In this case, a firm returns to normal levels of business activity ahead of recovery plan timelines, or withdraws from the Work-Sharing agreement for other reasons (for example, the firm is shutting down or deciding to go ahead with layoffs).Footnote 69 In 2023‑24, 41.1% of agreements were terminated earlier than their scheduled end date compared to 50.5% in 2022‑23.

Effectiveness of the Work-Sharing program over the years

A recent departmental evaluation* examined the usage of the Work-Sharing program and estimated the number of layoffs averted** by the program, and the number of shutdowns by employers who participated in the program.

The study found that, among Work-Sharing claimants between 2013 and 2019, 7% were laid-off and received EI regular benefits within 3 months, 11% within 6 months and 15% within 12 months after the end of the Work-Sharing claim. Employees with a higher reduction in work hours, older individuals, singles, those residing in the Atlantic region and those working in Primary industries were more likely to be laid off within 3 to 6 months after the end of their Work-Sharing claims.

When Work-Sharing claimants between 2015 and 2017 are compared to EI regular benefit claimants having similar characteristics but who did not participate in the Work-sharing program***, the former used on average less weeks of benefits, had a higher probability of returning to work after the claim, and were less likely to use EI regular benefits again in the 2 following years than the latter.

The evaluation also examined the likelihood of firms closures after participation in the Work-Sharing program. Between 2013 and 2019, 11% of them closed within 1 year, while 38% closed within 4 years following the agreement. Firms that laid-off employees during the agreement, with less than 20 employees and from the Prairies were more likely to close within 4 years following the agreement. Between 2013 and 2019, 10% of firms re-used the program within 1 year of their original Work-Sharing agreement, and 23% did it within 4 years.

  • * ESDC, Evaluation of the Work-Sharing Program: 2013 to 2020 (Ottawa: ESDC, Evaluation Directorate, 2025).
  • ** The methodology used to estimate the number of layoffs averted assumes a perfect substitution between 1 hour of work reduction with the Work-Sharing program and 1 hour of work reduction through the layoff alternative (a conversion rate of 1.0). The number of layoffs that occurred subsequent to the program was subtracted from the estimated number of layoffs averted to calculate the net layoffs averted.
  • *** The methodology used controls for differences in industry, region and size between firms participating in the Work-Sharing program and firms who employed the EI regular benefit claimants who did not participate in the Work-Sharing program. It also controls for differences between both types of claimants. EI regular benefit claimants who did not participate in the Work-Sharing program are non-seasonal claimants who were laid-off and did not participate in a Work-Sharing agreement in the previous 52 weeks.

2.6 Employment Insurance special benefits

In this section

EI special benefits provide temporary income support to employees, self-employed persons participating in the program, and fishers who are eligible and unable to work due to specific life circumstances. These include illness or injury; pregnancy or giving birth; providing care to a newborn or newly adopted child, and providing care or support to a critically ill or injured person or someone needing end-of-life care.

To qualify for EI special benefits, employees must have accumulated a minimum of 600 hours of insurable employment during their qualifying period. They must also meet the eligibility criteria for the special benefits claimed, and have their normal weekly earnings reduced by more than 40%.

Self-employed persons may qualify if they opted into the EI program and paid EI premiums at least one full year prior to claiming benefits. They also had to have self-employment income that met the minimum self-employment eligibility thresholdFootnote 70 in the calendar year preceding their claim, and met other eligibility criteria specific to the special benefits being claimed.

As mentioned in Section 2.1, 2 different sets of EI temporary measures were introduced over the past few years as the Canadian economy and job market recovered from the disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, claims established by employees in the first half of 2022‑23 required a minimum of 420 hours of insurable employment during the qualifying period to qualify for EI special benefits. These temporary measures ended on September 24, 2022. New claims established after this date were under the original EI rules.

Subsection 2.6.1 provides a summary overview of special benefits, including the number of new claims established, amount paid and the level of benefits. The following subsections examine the EI special benefits by type. Subsection 2.6.2 discusses maternity benefits and subsection 2.6.3 parental benefits. Sickness benefits are introduced in subsection 2.6.4. Subsections 2.6.5, 2.6.6 and 2.6.7 examine compassionate care benefits, the family caregiver benefits for adults and the family caregiver benefits for children, respectively. Finally, subsection 2.6.8 looks at the use of special benefits by self-employed persons who have opted into the EI program. For the purpose of the following section, EI special benefit claims refer to EI claims for which at least $1 of special benefits was paid. The EI administrative data used in this report underwent a revision in 2023‑24 and duplicates in the data were identified and removed. Compassionate care benefits, family caregiver benefits for adults and family caregiver benefits for children were more affected than other EI benefit types. Consult the methodology box in Section 2.1 for details.

It is important to note that the maternity and parental benefits offered under the EI program are available across Canada with the exception of Quebec. For parents who reside in Quebec, the Quebec Parental Insurance Plan (QPIP) has provided eligible salaried workers and self-employed persons with comparable benefits since January 1, 2006.

2.6.1. Employment Insurance special benefit claims overview

The number of new EI special benefit claims increased from 657,800 in 2022‑23 to 675,800 in 2023‑24 (consult Table 47). Claims established for sickness benefits increased the most (+11,318), followed by claims for parental benefits (+7,865) and claims for maternity benefits (+2,661).

Table 47 – Employment Insurance special benefit claims and amount paid according to benefit type, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Benefit type Number of claims 2022‑23 Number of claims 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ million) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ million) 2023‑24
Maternity 170,530 173,191 $1,356.3 $1,413.0
Parental 236,140 244,005 $3,499.6 $3,488.7
Sickness 418,480 429,798 $2,003.4 $2,725.3
Compassionate care* 6,619 6,417 $42.4 $39.9
Family caregiver for adults* 13,272 14,135 $74.7 $77.8
Family caregiver for children* 5,855 4,422 $41.2 $33.6
Canada 657,820 675,757 $7,017.5 $7,778.3
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes all claims for which at least $1 in EI special benefit was paid. New claims established by benefit type may not sum as claimants can receive multiple benefit types on a single claim.
  • * Due to revisions in EI administrative data, comparisons between 2023-24 and previous fiscal years need to be made with caution. Consult the methodology box in Section 2.1.
  • Consult Annex 2.11 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results on maternity, parental and sickness benefits are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24, whereas results on compassionate care benefits, family caregiver benefits for adults and family caregiver benefits for children are based on 100% of data.

Similar to previous years, sickness benefits continued to represent almost two-thirds (63.6%) of special benefit claims established in 2023‑24. During the same period, 36.1% and 25.6% of special benefit claims included parental and maternity benefits, respectively. Approximately 2.1% of all special benefit claims included family caregiver benefits for adults, 0.9% had compassionate care benefits, and 0.7% included family caregiver benefits for children.Footnote 71

The total amount paid out in special benefits increased from $7.0 billion in 2022‑23 to $7.8 billion in 2023‑24, largely driven by the increase in the average number of weeks of sickness benefits used. Amounts paid also increased for maternity benefits, while it slightly decreased for parental benefits.

In 2023‑24, women established a larger share (60.7%) of special benefit claims compared to men (39.3%). This breakdown of claims by gender is consistent with previous fiscal years. Women also continued to receive a greater share of the amounts paid in special benefits than men during 2023‑24 (77.4% for women versus 22.6% for men). This is mainly because only women can receive maternity benefits, a higher share of women than men receive parental benefits, and on average, women receive a higher number of weeks of parental benefits than men.

By age, claimants under 45 years continued to account for two-thirds (66.2%) of new special benefit claims and receive the largest share of the total amount paid in special benefits (79.6%) in 2023‑24.

Excluding extended parental benefits, which are paid at a lower benefit rate than other types of special benefits (consult subsection 2.6.3), the average weekly benefit rate for special benefit claims established during 2023‑24 was $549, representing a 4.5% increase compared to 2022‑23. Annex 2.11.2 presents the detailed breakdown of the average weekly benefit rate.

For all types of special benefits combined, the proportion of claims established in 2023‑24 receiving the maximum weekly benefit rate was 47.1%. By gender, 58.6% of claims established by men received the maximum weekly benefit rate in 2023‑24, compared to only 39.6% of claims established by women.

Employment Insurance special benefits and firms

According to 2022 tax data, which is the most recent data available at the time this report was produced, there were approximately 222,900 firms (16.9% of all firms in 2022) which were associated with the establishment of an EI special benefit claim as the claimant's current or most recent employer (consult Table 48).

Table 48 – Firms, employment and Employment Insurance special benefit claimants by firm size*, Canada, 2022
Firm size* Number of firms Number of firms with at least one employee receiving EI special benefits Employment distribution**
(% share)
Distribution of EI special benefit claimants***
(% share)
Distribution of EI sickness benefit claimants***
(% share)
Small 1,193,372 130,804 21.0% 18.7% 20.8%
Small-medium 101,110 71,865 19.4% 20.7% 25.6%
Medium-large 17,434 16,747 16.2% 18.2% 20.8%
Large 3,472 3,455 43.4% 42.4% 32.8%
Canada 1,315,388 222,871 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
  • Note: Data may not add up due to rounding.
  • * Small-sized firms are defined as those that employ 1 to 19 employees. The category also includes tax records for which the firm's size could not be determined. Small-to-medium sized firms employ 20 to 99 employees. Medium-to-large sized firms employ 100 to 499 employees. Large-sized firms employ 500 employees or more.
  • ** The number of workers in a firm is the number of individuals with employment income in that firm, as indicated on a T4 form. The number of workers is adjusted so that each individual in the labour force is only counted once and individuals who work for more than one firm are taken into account. For example, if an employee earned $25,000 in firm 1 and $25,000 in firm 2, then he or she would be recorded as 0.5 employees at the first firm and 0.5 employees at the second firm.
  • *** These figures are based on the number of people receiving EI special benefits or EI sickness benefits in 2022.
  • Sources: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of EI administrative data. Canada Revenue Agency, CRA administrative data. Results are based on 100% of CRA data.

The distribution of the workforce and of EI special benefit claimants is roughly similar by firm size, unlike EI regular benefits, where larger firms are typically under-represented (consult Section 2.2). For special benefits, the largest difference between employee and claimant distributions was observed in small-sized firms. These firms accounted for 21.0% of the total workforce, while they represented 18.7% of the claimants for EI special benefits in 2022. While workforce adjustment issues during a difficult business or economic context may offer some explanation of the higher relative use of EI regular benefits among small firms, the use of EI special benefits is more likely related to the demographic profile of the workforce, individual circumstances, and the nature of the work in the industry.

However, when the distribution of the workforce is compared solely to the one of EI sickness benefit claimants, larger firms are under-represented. They accounted for 43.4% of the total workforce, while they represented 32.8% of the claimants for EI sickness benefits in 2022. This difference can be largely explained by the fact that large-sized firms are generally more likely to offer short-term disability plans to their employees. As a result, employees who are unable to work because of illness or injury and are covered by their employers' plans may not have to collect EI benefits, as benefits from the registered plans have to be paid before EI benefits are paid.

2.6.2 Employment Insurance maternity benefits

EI maternity benefits are available to eligible persons who cannot work because they are pregnant or have recently given birth. EI maternity claimants need to provide Service Canada with a signed statement attesting to their pregnancy and their expected or actual date of delivery. Qualified claimants may receive up to 15 weeks of maternity benefits. Benefits can begin to be paid as early as 12 weeks prior to the expected date of birth and can end as late as 17 weeks after the child's actual birth date. Subsection 2.6.3 discusses coverage and accessibility of EI maternity benefits.

Employment Insurance maternity claims, amount paid and level of benefits

The total number of new maternity claims established was just under 173,200 in 2023‑24, similar to the previous fiscal year. The breakdown of claims by province showed that Ontario continued to account for half of all maternity claims (consult Table 49).

Table 49 – Employment Insurance maternity claims and amount paid by province or territory and age, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ millions) 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 2,160 2,175 $16.7 $17.6
Prince Edward Island 1,020 1,005 $8.1 $7.9
Nova Scotia 5,070 5,225 $38.0 $41.9
New Brunswick 4,080 4,112 $33.2 $31.4
Quebec n/a n/a n/a n/a
Ontario 86,700 88,966 $697.3 $737.8
Manitoba 7,960 8,134 $60.6 $62.6
Saskatchewan 7,300 7,261 $56.0 $57.9
Alberta 28,390 28,518 $222.7 $227.2
British Columbia 26,980 27,029 $216.2 $221.8
Yukon 280 290 $2.5 $2.6
Northwest Territories 330 279 $2.8 $2.6
Nunavut 260 197 $2.2 $1.7
24 years old and under 11,740 10,444 $71.2 $67.7
25 to 39 years old 150,850 154,696 $1,219.0 $1,277.8
40 years old and over 7,940 8,051 $66.1 $67.5
Canada 170,530 173,191 $1,356.3 $1,413.0
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI maternity benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.14 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

In 2023‑24, the majority of new maternity claims (89.3%) were established by women between 25 and 39 years old. The distribution of claims across age groups is similar to the one observed in past years.

The total amount paid in maternity benefits reached $1.4 billion in 2023‑24 (consult Table 49). Consistent with the number of claims, Ontario accounted for 52.2% of the total amount paid and mothers aged 25 to 39 years received 90.4% of maternity benefit payments over the reporting period.

In 2023‑24, the average weekly maternity benefit rate was $563, representing a 4.2% increase from the previous fiscal year (consult Annex 2.14.3). Overall, the average weekly maternity benefit rate continued to be higher for claims established in the Territories and by mothers aged 40 years and over. Of all claims established over the period, 54.5% received the maximum weekly benefit rate, compared to 51.3% in the previous fiscal year.

Maternity benefits are frequently combined in the same claim with other benefit types, particularly parental (98.5%) and sickness (14.7%) benefits; 98.4% of all EI maternity claims completed during 2023‑24 included another type of EI benefit (consult subsection 2.1.2).

Duration of Employment Insurance maternity benefits

As observed during previous fiscal years, mothers typically use almost all of the EI maternity weeks to which they are entitled. In 2023‑24, 92.8% of mothers received maternity benefits during the entire 15 weeks available to them. During the reporting period, the average duration of completed maternity claims was 14.7 weeks, similar to the previous fiscal year. The breakdown of the average duration by province and age also remained relatively unchanged compared to 2022‑23.

2.6.3 Employment Insurance parental benefits

EI parental benefits are available to eligible parents who take a leave from work to care for a newborn or recently adopted child or children. Claimants must provide a declaration as to the newborn's date of birth or, for the purpose of an adoption, the date of the child's placement and the name and address of the adoption authority. Parents must choose between standard parental benefits or extended parental benefits.

Standard parental benefits provide up to 40 weeks of benefits paid over a maximum of 12 months (this includes the additional 5 weeks of benefits available to parents who share parental benefits). A parent cannot receive more than 35 weeks of standard benefits. The benefit rate is 55% of weekly insurable earnings up to a maximum of $650 in 2023 and $668 in 2024.

Extended parental benefits provide up to 69 weeks of benefits paid over a maximum of 18 months (this includes the additional 8 weeks of benefits available to parents who share parental benefits). A parent cannot receive more than 61 weeks of extended benefits. The benefit rate is 33% of weekly insurable earnings up to a maximum of $390 in 2023 and $401 in 2024.

Parents can share and use parental benefits at the same time or different times within 12 months (standard parental benefits) or 18 months (extended parental benefits) of birth or placement for the purpose of adoption. When parental benefits are shared, only one parent needs to serve the one-week waiting period. Parents must choose the same parental benefits option (standard or extended) when they apply for benefits. The choice of the first parent who completes the application is binding on other parents. Once parental benefits have been paid out to any parent, they cannot change their option but may change how they share the weeks of benefits.

Employment Insurance maternity and parental benefits: Coverage and accessibility

The Employment Insurance Coverage Survey (EICS) provides a meaningful picture of who does or does not have access to EI benefits, notably EI maternity and parental benefits. This survey complements EI administrative data that only cover EI claimants. According to the 2023 EICS,Footnote 72 75.6% of parents with a child aged 18 months or younger living outside Quebec had insurable employment in 2023. Among these new parents with insurable employment, 91.3% reported having received maternity or parental benefits, which is similar to the previous year (92.4% in 2022).

According to EICS data, the proportion of spouses or partners living outside Quebec who received or intended to claim EI parental benefits increased from 31.3% in 2022 to 39.3% in 2023. This proportion continues to increase as it was only 11.9% in 2017 and 19.5% in 2020. The additional weeks of EI benefits that have been available to new parents sharing parental benefits since March 2019 may have contributed to this increase.

As in previous years, 2023 EICS data continue to show that the share of new parents with insurable employment in Quebec who received maternity or parental benefits under QPIP (95.0%) is greater than that of parents having received EI maternity or parental benefits in the rest of Canada (91.3%), despite having decreased from 99.3% in 2022. The higher share in Quebec can be explained by several factors, most notably the lower eligibility requirement based on earnings under QPIP ($2,000). In addition, despite a decrease of 12.7 percentage points (p.p.) compared to 2022, a larger share of spouses or partners in Quebec received parental benefits or intended to receive them (80.2%), compared to the rest of Canada (39.3%). Historically, this proportion has remained higher for Quebec, however, the gap has narrowed in recent years.

Employers may choose to offer their employees a supplement to EI maternity and parental benefits (consult subsection 2.1.1 for more details). According to the 2023 EICS data, the share of parents with a child aged 18 months or younger living outside Quebec who received top-ups to their EI benefits from their employer (50.2%) increased compared to previous years (41.5% and 43.9% in 2021 and 2022, respectively).

Employment Insurance parental claims, amount paid and level of benefits

The total number of new parental claims established was 244,000 in 2023‑24, higher than the number established in 2022‑23 (consult Table 50). Extended parental benefits accounted for 17.9% of all parental claims established in 2023‑24, relatively unchanged compared to previous fiscal years.

Table 50 – Employment Insurance parental claims and amount paid by benefit type, province or territory, gender and age, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ millions) 2023‑24
Standard parental benefit 193,400 200,350 $2,793.6 $2,840.5
Extended parental benefit 42,740 43,655 $706.0 $648.2
Newfoundland and Labrador 2,880 2,748 $44.1 $43.7
Prince Edward Island 1,350 1,355 $21.7 $18.7
Nova Scotia 7,500 7,662 $108.2 $102.7
New Brunswick 5,720 5,797 $85.5 $79.7
Quebec n/a n/a n/a n/a
Ontario 121,910 126,387 $1,779.7 $1,806.9
Manitoba 11,170 11,669 $166.4 $157.9
Saskatchewan 9,090 9,786 $148.1 $143.6
Alberta 37,420 38,471 $569.7 $562.4
British Columbia 37,840 39,017 $555.5 $556.1
Yukon 490 432 $7.4 $6.6
Northwest Territories 410 400 $8.1 $5.8
Nunavut 360 281 $5.3 $4.5
Men 69,270 74,540 $441.8 $464.7
Women 166,870 169,465 $3,057.8 $3,024.0
24 years old and under 12,920 11,781 $170.9 $159.4
25 to 39 years old 205,150 212,967 $3,103.7 $3,096.9
40 years old and over 18,070 19,257 $225.0 $232.4
Canada 236,140 244,005 $3,499.6 $3,488.7
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI parental benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.15 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

Among those parental claims, some were established by adoptive parents. These claims continued to account for less than 1.0% (about 1,200) of all parental claims. In 2023‑24, 15.7% of parental claims established by adoptive parents were for extended parental benefits. A lower share of parental claims were established by women among adoptive parents (56.0%) compared to all parental claims (69.5%) in 2023‑24. However, a higher share of parental claims were established by claimants 40 years old and over by adoptive parents (41.2%) compared to all parental claims (7.9%) in 2023‑24.

The breakdown of parental claims by province and territory remained relatively stable in 2023‑24 compared to 2022‑23. Over the entire reporting period, the majority of new parental claims were established by women (69.5%). However, the share of claims established by men continued to increase and reached 30.5% in 2023‑24, compared to 29.3% in the previous fiscal year. This share has almost doubled since 2017‑18. The additional weeks of benefits available to parents of a child born or adopted on or after March 17, 2019 who share parental benefits may have contributed to the continued increase in claims by men. Chart 24 illustrates the share of men among parental claimants over the past 10 years.

Chart 24 – Share of EI parental claims established by men, by parental benefit option*, Canada, 2014‑15 to 2023‑24
Chart 24: description follows
Text description for Chart 24
Share of EI parental claims established by men, by parental benefit option* Standard parental benefits Extended parental benefits
2014-15 13.9% Not available
2015-16 13.6% Not available
2016-17 15.0% Not available
2017-18 16.0% 5.3%
2018-19 17.9% 11.2%
2019-20 22.8% 19.6%
2020-21 24.1% 21.0%
2021-22 29.4% 23.2%
2022-23 29.8% 27.2%
2023-24 31.0% 28.3%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI parental benefits was paid.
  • * There are no results for extended parental benefits before 2017‑18 because these benefits started to be available on December 3, 2017.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2014‑15 to 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

In 2023‑24, the majority of new parental claims (87.3%) were established by claimants aged 25 to 39 years. The breakdown of parental claims by age remained similar to the previous year.

The amount paid in parental benefits totalled $3.5 billion in 2023‑24, similar to 2022‑23 (consult Table 50). The slight difference in the total parental benefits paid can be explained by the lower amount paid in extended parental benefits in 2023‑24 compared to the previous fiscal year. Extended parental benefits paid represented 18.6% of total parental benefits paid in 2023‑24, which is similar to the proportion (17.9%) of these claims among all parental claims.

All provinces and territories recorded decreases in parental benefits paid compared to 2022‑23, except for British Columbia and Ontario. The amount paid to men accounted for 13.3% of the total amount paid in parental benefits in 2023‑24, while claims established by men accounted for 30.5% of new parental claims in the same period. This may be explained, in part, by the smaller number of weeks of parental benefits typically received by men compared to women. The breakdown of the amount paid in parental benefits by age group for 2023‑24 is roughly the same as for new claims established during the period.

As stated above, the benefit rate (55% or 33% of average weekly earnings) and the maximum weekly benefit rate are calculated differently depending on whether the claimant is receiving standard or extended benefits.

In 2023‑24, the average weekly standard parental benefit rate was $582, a 3.9% increase from the previous fiscal year (consult Annex 2.15.5). On average, the weekly benefit rate was higher for standard parental claims established in the Northwest Territories, by men and by claimants aged 40 years and over. Over the fiscal year, 62.1% of claimants received the maximum weekly standard parental benefit rate. By gender, 77.3% of claims established by men received the maximum weekly benefit rate in 2023‑24, compared to 55.2% of claims established by women.

In 2023‑24, the average weekly extended parental benefit rate was $353, a 4.1% increase from the previous fiscal year (consult Annex 2.15.9). Overall, the average weekly benefit rate was higher for extended parental claims established in the territories, by men and by claimants aged 40 and over. Over the fiscal year, 62.9% of claimants received the maximum weekly extended parental benefit rate. By gender, 86.2% of claims established by men received the maximum weekly benefit rate in 2023‑24, compared to 53.8% of claims established by women.

Duration and sharing of Employment Insurance parental benefits

Standard parental benefits

Among claims for standard parental benefits completed in 2023‑24, 39.8% had shared weeks of benefits. The proportion of parents sharing parental benefits increased compared to the previous fiscal year where 37.1% of claims were shared.

When weeks of benefits were shared, women and men received, on average, 31.7 and 8.3 weeks of standard parental benefits in 2023‑24, respectively, compared to 30.6 and 7.2 weeks in 2022‑23 (consult Table 51). The combined number of weeks of parental benefits used by families was, on average, 38.0 weeks for standard parental claims in 2023-24.

Table 51 – Average number of weeks of Employment Insurance parental benefits for completed claims, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category Duration of claims not shared 2022‑23R Duration of claims not shared 2023‑24P Duration of shared claims 2022‑23R Duration of shared claims 2023‑24P
Standard parental – Men 17.9 17.5 7.2 8.3
Standard parental – Women 32.9 32.9 30.6 31.7
Standard parental – Family n/a n/a 37.8 38.0
Extended parental – Men 35.1 34.0 11.4 Not available*
Extended parental – Women 57.6 57.9 53.0 Not available*
Extended parental – Family n/a n/a 64.3 Not available*
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI parental benefits was paid.
  • * Since extended parental benefits can be paid over a maximum of 18 months, the average duration of shared extended parental benefits is reported with a one-year lag to ensure that both parents have completed their claim.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Consult Annex 2.15 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

In 2023‑24, of all families sharing standard parental benefits, 89.3% used at least one of the extra 5 weeks available to them, and 57.4% used all 40 weeks of parental benefits to which they were entitled. Of the claims completed by men in 2023‑24, 41.8% received 5 weeks of benefits and 36.0% received more than 5 weeks. In almost all families, parents used some weeks of maternity or parental benefits at the same time. On average, in 2023-24, there were 5.4 weeks of overlap between parents for families receiving standard parental benefits.

For parental claims completed in 2023‑24 for which benefit weeks were not shared, the average duration of standard parental benefits was 32.9 weeks for women and 17.5 weeks for men, compared to 32.9 and 17.9 weeks, respectively, in 2022‑23 (consult Table 51). Among non-shared claims for standard parental benefits, 71.2% used the maximum 35 weeks of benefits available to them.

Extended parental benefits

Since extended parental benefits can be paid over a maximum of 18 months, starting with this year's report, the duration of shared extended parental benefits is reported with a one-year lag to ensure that both parents have completed their claim. This methodological change allows for more accurate results. Therefore, results on duration of shared extended parental benefits for 2023‑24 will be presented in next year's report.

For extended parental benefits for which benefit weeks were not shared, the average duration was 57.9 weeks for women and 34.0 weeks for men in 2023‑24, versus 57.6 and 35.1 weeks, respectively, in 2022‑23 (consult Table 51). Among non-shared claims for extended parental benefits, 72.7% used all 61 weeks of benefits to which they were entitled.

2.6.4 Employment Insurance sickness benefits

Employment Insurance (EI) sickness benefits provide financial support to eligible people who are unable to work because of illness, injury or quarantine, but would otherwise be available to work. As of December 18, 2022, the maximum number of weeks available for sickness benefit claimants increased from 15 to 26 weeks. Consequently, 2023-24 marks the first full year since the extension to 26 weeks. The maximum duration of benefits to which a sickness claimant is entitled per claim depends on the recommendations provided by their physician or another approved medical practitioner. Additionally, with job protection through the Canada Labour Code and the provincial and territorial statutes under labour law, EI sickness benefits enable claimants to focus on recovery while maintaining their attachment to the labour market.

Premium Reduction Program

Employers who offer short-term disability plans to their employees that meet requirements stipulated in the Employment Insurance Act and Employment Insurance Regulations can register their plans with Service Canada to obtain a lower EI premium rate than the regular employer rate through the Premium Reduction Program (PRP).

More information on the effect on premiums and the number of firms affected can be found in Section 2.7.

Employment Insurance sickness claims, amount paid and level of benefits

In 2023‑24, almost 429,800 new sickness claims were established (consult Table 52). This number is higher than the previous fiscal year, where almost 418,500 new sickness claims were established, and also exceeds pre‑pandemic levels at least partially due to population growth.

Table 52 – Employment Insurance sickness claims and amount paid by province or territory, gender and age, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ millions) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ millions) 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 12,680 12,710 $57.0 $82.0
Prince Edward Island 5,330 5,438 $21.9 $27.0
Nova Scotia 19,170 20,042 $81.9 $112.5
New Brunswick 26,650 26,205 $110.7 $140.0
Quebec 130,250 133,653 $602.8 $790.7
Ontario 116,800 118,531 $584.1 $808.1
Manitoba 11,300 12,478 $52.7 $78.5
Saskatchewan 8,320 8,326 $41.3 $53.7
Alberta 33,880 37,376 $169.3 $250.6
British Columbia 53,270 54,136 $276.8 $374.7
Yukon 370 416 $2.0 $3.3
Northwest Territories 270 311 $1.9 $2.7
Nunavut 190 176 $1.0 $1.5
Male 177,150 185,017 $914.8 $1,240.8
Female 241,330 244,781 $1,088.6 $1,484.4
24 years old and under 31,290 29,972 $115.6 $141.4
25 to 34 years old 91,830 95,804 $403.6 $543.2
35 to 44 years old 86,500 89,729 $422.3 $579.3
45 to 54 years old 85,250 85,993 $441.8 $589.2
55 to 64 years old 95,440 97,376 $485.2 $667.4
65 years old and over 28,170 30,924 $134.9 $204.7
Canada 418,480 429,798 $2,003.4 $2,725.3
  • Notes: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI sickness benefits was paid.
  • Consult Annex 2.16 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2022‑23 and 100% of data for 2023‑24.

In 2023‑24, almost every province and territory recorded an increase in the number of sickness claims compared to the previous fiscal year, except for New Brunswick and Nunavut.

Consistent with previous fiscal years, a larger share of new EI sickness claims were established by women (57.0%) than men (43.0%). Claimants aged 55 to 64 years established the largest share of new sickness claims during the fiscal year (22.7%).

Relative to their representation in the labour force, claimants aged 24 years and under, as well as those aged 35 to 44 years were the most under‑represented in terms of sickness claims and amounts paid, while claimants aged 55 to 64 years were the most over‑represented during the fiscal year (consult Chart 25).Footnote 73

Chart 25 – Proportion of Employment Insurance sickness claims, amount paid and labour force, by age, Canada, 2023‑24
Chart 25: description follows
Text description for Chart 25
Age category Share of sickness claims established Share of amount paid in sickness benefits Share in the labour force
24 years old and under 7.0% 5.2% 13.8%
25 to 34 years old 22.3% 19.9% 23.3%
35 to 44 years old 20.9% 21.3% 22.2%
45 to 54 years old 20.0% 21.6% 19.5%
55 to 64 years old 22.7% 24.5% 16.0%
65 years old and over 7.2% 7.5% 5.1%
  • Note: Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI sickness benefits was paid.
  • Sources: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data. Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, Table 14-10-0017-01.

The total amount paid in sickness benefits was $2.7 billion in 2023­‑24, compared to $2.0 billion in 2022‑23 (consult Table 52). This increase is mainly due to the increase in the average duration of sickness claims established on or after December 18, 2022. The breakdown of total sickness benefits paid by province and territory remained fairly consistent with previous fiscal years.

As with new claims, women received a slightly larger share of the total amount paid in sickness benefits than men, at 54.5% and 45.5%, respectively. Claimants aged 45 and over received a larger share of the total amount of payments for sickness benefits than their share in the labour force, while claimants under the age of 45 received a smaller share (consult Chart 25).

By industry, the goods-producing industries continued to be overrepresented among EI sickness claims and total benefits paid. This sector accounted for 25.9% of new EI sickness claims in 2023‑24, despite representing only 20.4% of the workforce (consult Table 53).

Table 53 – Employment Insurance sickness claims and amount paid, and employment, by industry, Canada, 2023‑24
Industry Number of claims (thousands) (% share) Amount paid ($ millions) (% share) Employment (thousands) (% share)
Goods-producing industries 111.5
(25.9%)
$721.7
(26.5%)
4,195.6
(20.5%)
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 11.3
(2.6%)
$56.6
(2.1%)
305.4
(1.5%)
Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction 4.0
(0.9%)
$30.7
(1.1%)
280.6
(1.4%)
Utilities 0.6
(0.1%)
$4.5
(0.2%)
159.3
(0.8%)
Construction 44.0
(10.2%)
$299.2
(11.0%)
1,602.4
(7.8%)
Manufacturing 51.6
(12.0%)
$330.7
(12.1%)
1,848.0
(9.0%)
Services-producing industries 310.1
(72.1%)
$1,958.4
(71.9%)
16,250.5
(79.5%)
Wholesale and retail trade 67.7
(15.7%)
$392.5
(14.4%)
2,987.1
(14.6%)
Transportation and warehousing 23.2
(5.4%)
$167.8
(6.2%)
1,058.9
(5.2%)
Finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing 11.6
(2.7%)
$81.7
(3.0%)
1,388.7
(6.8%)
Professional, scientific, and technical services 14.3
(3.3%)
$92.3
(3.4%)
1,917.2
(9.4%)
Business, building, and other support services* 29.1
(6.8%)
$192.0
(7.0%)
690.6
(3.4%)
Educational services 14.4
(3.3%)
$79.6
(2.9%)
1,533.8
(7.5%)
Healthcare and social assistance 64.4
(15.0%)
$420.0
(15.4%)
2,718.8
(13.3%)
Information, culture, and recreation** 8.1
(1.9%)
$47.2
(1.7%)
848.6
(4.2%)
Accommodation and food services 27.1
(6.3%)
$140.5
(5.2%)
1,127.6
(5.5%)
Other services (excluding public administration) 18.0
(4.2%)
$110.6
(4.1%)
781.5
(3.8%)
Public administration 32.2
(7.5%)
$234.3
(8.6%)
1,197.8
(5.9%)
Unclassified industries*** 8.2
(1.9%)
$45.2
(1.7%)
n/a
Canada 429.8
(100.0%)
$2,725.3
(100.0%)
20,446.1
(100.0%)
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Percentage shares are based on unrounded numbers. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI sickness benefits was paid.
  • * This industry sector comprises the industries with codes 55 (Management of companies and enterprises) and 56 (Administrative and support, waste management and remediation services).
  • ** This industry sector comprises the industries with codes 51 (Information and cultural industries) and 71 (Arts, entertainment and recreation).
  • *** For some claims, this information was not available in the data.
  • Consult Annex 2.17 for more details.
  • Sources: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data. Statistics Canada, Labour Force Survey, Table 14-10-0022-01 (for employment data).

In 2023‑24, the average weekly sickness benefit rate was $531, an increase of 4.9% over last fiscal year. On average, the highest weekly sickness benefit rate was paid for claims established in the Nunavut, by men, and by claimants aged 35 to 44 years (consult Annex 2.15.3). Consistent with previous fiscal years, a little more than a third (37.6%) of all sickness claimants received the maximum weekly benefit rate (consult subsection 2.1.1 for more details).

Duration of Employment Insurance sickness benefits

For sickness claims completed in 2023‑24, claims established prior to December 18, 2022 were entitled to a maximum of 15 weeks of benefits, while those established on or after December 18, 2022 were entitled to a maximum of 26 weeks of benefits. The number of weeks of benefits to which a claimant is entitled depends on the claimant's medical practitioner's assessment.

As illustrated in Chart 26, sickness claims completed in 2023‑24 that were entitled to a maximum of 15 weeks of benefits used on average 9.0 weeks, which is consistent with the average duration in previous fiscal years. In comparison, sickness claims that were entitled to a maximum of 26 weeks of benefits used significantly more weeks on average, reaching 12.4 weeks in 2023‑24.

Chart 26 – Average number of weeks of Employment Insurance sickness benefits for completed claims, Canada, 2015‑16 to 2023‑24
Chart 26: description follows
Text description for Chart 26
Fiscal year Sickness claims entitled to a maximum of 15 weeks Sickness claims entitled to a maximum of 26 weeks
2015-16 9.8 n/a
2016-17 9.9 n/a
2017-18 9.8 n/a
2018-19 9.8 n/a
2019-20 10.0 n/a
2020-21 9.1 n/a
2021-22 9.1 n/a
2022-23 9.5R n/a
2023-24 9.0P 12.4 P
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI sickness benefits was paid.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Consult Annex 2.16 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2015‑16 to 2021‑22 and 100% of data for 2022‑23 and 2023‑24.

For completed sickness claims entitled to a maximum of 26 weeks of benefits, men and women used on average 12.0 and 12.7 weeks in 2023‑24, respectively. Sickness claims that were entitled to a maximum of 15 weeks of benefits showed a similar pattern, with men using on average a lower number of weeks than women in 2023‑24 (consult Annex 2.16.2).

As in previous years, the average number of weeks of sickness benefits paid increased with the age of claimants. Among completed sickness claims that were entitled to a maximum of 26 weeks of benefits, claimants aged 24 years and under experienced, on average, the shortest duration (10.2 weeks), while those aged 55 years and over registered the longest duration (13.8 weeks) (consult Annex 2.16.2).

Over one-quarter (27.4%) of all sickness claims completed in 2023‑24 that were established before December 18, 2022, used the maximum of 15 weeks of benefits, which is lower than previous fiscal years (consult Table 54). Meanwhile, nearly one‑sixth (16.0%) of all sickness claims completed in 2023‑24 that were established on or after December 18, 2022, used the maximum of 26 weeks of benefits.

Table 54 – Share of completed Employment Insurance sickness claims that used the maximum number of weeks of sickness benefits by age, Canada, 2019‑20 to 2023‑24
Age category 2019‑20 2020‑21 2021‑22 Claim established before December 18, 2022 and completed in 2022‑23R Claim established before December 18, 2022 and completed in 2023‑24P Claim established on or after December 18, 2022 and completed in 2023‑24P
24 years old and under 29.6% 24.8% 26.2% 26.9% 22.4% 9.3%
25 to 44 years old 33.0% 28.9% 31.9% 31.5% 25.6% 13.2%
45 to 54 years old 39.9% 35.4% 39.2% 38.2% 31.0% 17.0%
55 years old and over 42.5% 41.3% 43.1% 40.4% 29.7% 20.7%
Canada 37.0% 33.4% 35.7% 35.0% 27.4% 16.0%
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 in EI sickness benefits was paid.
  • p Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2019‑20 to 2021‑22 and 100% of data for 2022‑23 and 2023‑24.

For completed sickness claims that were entitled up to 26 weeks of benefits, women (16.5%) were slightly more likely than men (15.2%) to use the maximum 26 weeks of benefits in 2023‑24. Completed sickness claims entitled up to 15 weeks of benefits showed similar results across genders in 2023‑24. By age, the use of all 15 or 26 weeks of sickness benefits generally increases with the age of claimants (consult Table 54).

Among completed sickness claims in 2023‑24 that were entitled up to a maximum of 26 weeks of benefits, 61.4% used less than 15 weeks, while 6.3% used exactly 15 weeks. A further 16.4% used more than 15 weeks but less than the maximum 26 weeks. The remaining 16.0% used the maximum 26 weeks of benefits (consult Table 55).

Table 55 – Share of completed Employment Insurance sickness claims by weeks of sickness benefits used, Canada, 2019‑20 to 2023‑24
Weeks of sickness benefits used 2019‑20 2020‑21 2021‑22 2022‑23R Claim established before December 18, 2022 and completed in 2023‑24P Claim established on or after December 18, 2022 and completed in 2023‑24P
1 to 14 weeks 63.0% 66.6% 64.3% 65.0% 72.6% 61.4%
15 weeks 37.0% 33.4% 35.7% 35.0% 27.4% 6.3%
16 to 25 weeks Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 16.4%
26 weeks Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 16.0%
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes completed claims for which at least $1 in EI sickness benefits was paid.
  • p Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 10% sample of data for 2019‑20 to 2021‑22 and 100% of data for 2022‑23 and 2023‑24.

Employment Insurance sickness benefits and short-term disability plans (STDP) offered by employers

An internal analysis examined the number of employers who offered STDPs (that are registered with the Premium Reduction Program (PRP)) to their employees between 2016 and 2019 in Canada. It found that around 2% of all employers on average had plans registered with the PRP over that four‑year period. Small-sized firms (1 to 19 employees) were less likely to offer STDPs compared to large-sized firms (500 employees or more) (less than 1% and around 70%, on average, respectively).

Close to one-third of employees in Canada were covered by STDPs registered with the PRP over the four-year period. The proportion of employees covered increased with annual employment income. Around 8% of employees earning less than $20,000 per year were covered compared to more than half of employees earning more than $60,000 per year. Women were slightly more likely than men to be covered (33% versus 31%, on average). In terms of age, a higher share of core-age employees (35 to 54 years old) was covered than younger employees (24 years old and under) and older employees (55 years and over).

The analysis also compared the characteristics of 2 groups of EI sickness claimants – those who had coverage from a plan registered with the PRP and used the benefits before applying for EI sickness benefits, as required by EI regulations, and those who were not covered by a registered plan and turned directly to EI sickness benefits. Claimants for whom the EI program was the second payer were proportionally more likely to use the maximum 15-week period provided for EI sickness benefits than those who received only EI sickness benefits (an average of 44% compared to 40%, respectively, for the period between 2016 and 2019). In 2019, 14.4% of all EI sickness claimants used EI as a second payer, while the remaining 85.6% of EI sickness claimants used EI as a first payer.*

The majority of employers receiving a premium reduction through the PRP offered weekly indemnity plans, which provide benefits for a minimum of 15 weeks. Given that claimants who were covered by a plan offered by their employer had to use all of their short-term disability insurance benefits before establishing an EI sickness claim, it is possible that those who used all 15 weeks of EI sickness benefits were more likely to have severe medical issues that require longer recovery time.

* The methodology used in this internal analysis to determine if an employee is covered or not by their employer's STDP is different from the one used in the departmental study Enhance Understanding of the Use of the Premium Reduction Program (Ottawa: ESDC, Evaluation Directorate, 2019). Disaggregated information at the payroll level was used to distinguish between employees covered by their employers' STDPs and employees working for employers offering STDPs but that were not themselves covered. Consequently, the proportion of employees covered by STPDs is lower in the internal analysis than the supplemental study.

2.6.5 Employment Insurance compassionate care benefits

EI compassionate care benefits offer temporary income support to any eligible person who needs to take temporary leave from work to provide end-of-life care to family membersFootnote 74 with a serious medical condition that poses a significant risk of death within 26 weeks. The benefits may be received for up to 26 weeks and may be paid to a single caregiver or shared among multiple caregivers, and only 1 of them needs to serve the waiting period. Claimants must provide Service Canada with a medical certificate issued by the family member's doctor or nurse practitioner confirming certain details surrounding the individual's medical condition.

Employment Insurance compassionate care claims, amount paid and level of benefits

In 2023‑24, there were just over 6,400 new claims established for compassionate care benefits (consult Table 56). The breakdown of the number of claims by region remained relatively stable in 2023‑24 compared to previous fiscal years. Quebec and Ontario continued to represent more than half (59.3%) of claims established for compassionate care benefits in 2023‑24.

Table 56 – Employment Insurance compassionate care claims and amount paid, by region, gender and age group, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24*
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ thousands) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ thousands) 2023‑24
Newfoundland and Labrador 79 83 $462.5 $461.7
Prince Edward Island 44 44 $220.6 $300.1
Nova Scotia 210 227 $1,384.0 $1,488.1
New Brunswick 141 125 $1,022.4 $711.2
Quebec 1,131 1,039 $6,035.5 $5,360.6
Ontario 2,820 2,766 $18,781.0 $17,265.0
Manitoba 264 267 $1,482.9 $1,552.6
Saskatchewan 151 153 $872.7 $938.9
Alberta 732 723 $5,082.6 $5,241.6
British Columbia 1,034 976 $6,994.6 $6,514.6
Territories 13 14 $75.5 $112.3
Men 2,025 2,011 $14,442.6 $14,450.0
Women 4,594 4,406 $27,971.8 $25,496.8
24 years old and under 120 125 $637.3 $699.4
25 to 44 years old 2,153 2,210 $13,424.4 $13,446.5
45 to 54 years old 2,044 1,847 $13,156.0 $11,386.5
55 years old and over 2,302 2,235 $15,196.6 $14,414.3
Canada 6,619 6,417 $42,414.4 $39,946.8
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI compassionate care benefits was paid.
  • * Due to revisions in EI administrative data, comparisons between 2023‑24 and previous fiscal years need to be made with caution. Consult the methodology box in Section 2.1.
  • Consult Annex 2.18 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

In terms of gender, women continued to represent a larger share of compassionate care benefit claims than men, with just over two-thirds (68.7%) of claims established. Among age groups, the number of claims established was relatively similar for claimants in the 3 older age groups (25 to 44 years, 45 to 54 years, and 55 years and over). However, while claimants aged 45 years and over represented 63.6% of claims for compassionate care benefits, they only represented 40.8% of the Canadian labour force.Footnote 75

The total amount paid in compassionate care benefits was $39.9 million in 2023‑24. Women received 63.8% of this amount, a decrease of 2.1 percentage points (p.p.) compared to the previous fiscal year. In terms of age groups, claimants aged 55 years and over received 36.1% of the total amount paid in compassionate care benefits in 2023‑24, despite only accounting for 21.3% of the Canadian labour force. Conversely, claimants aged 24 years and under accounted for 1.8% of compassionate benefits paid in 2023‑24, compared to a representation of 14.1% in the labour force.

In 2023‑24, the average weekly benefit rate for compassionate care benefits increased by 3.4%, going from $546 to $564. On average, the highest average weekly benefit rate was for claims established in the territories, by men and by claimants aged between 25 and 44 years (consult Annex 2.18.3). Nearly half of all claims established in 2023‑24 (49.9%) received the maximum weekly benefit rate for compassionate care benefits, an increase of 2.1 p.p. from the previous fiscal year.

Duration of Employment Insurance compassionate care benefits

The average duration of EI compassionate claims completed in 2023‑24 was 11.0 weeks, compared to 11.5 weeks in 2022‑23 (consult Table 57). A small proportion of claims completed in 2023‑24 had weeks of benefits that were shared among multiple caregivers (6.5%). This proportion was slightly higher than the one reported in 2022‑23 (5.6%).

Table 57 – Average duration and share of completed Employment Insurance compassionate care claims that used all 26 weeks of benefits, Canada, 2019‑20 to 2023‑24
Category 2019‑20 2020‑21 2021‑22 2022‑23R 2023‑24P
Average duration (weeks) 11.1 11.8 11.6 11.5 11.0
Share (%) of completed compassionate care claims using all 26 weeks of benefits 16.7% 21.5% 19.3% 19.1% 16.8%
  • Note: Includes completed claims for which at least $1 of EI compassionate care benefits was paid.
  • P Preliminary data.
  • R Revised data.
  • Consult Annex 2.18 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

In 2023‑24, the average duration of claims for compassionate care benefits was higher for men (11.8 weeks) than for women (10.7 weeks). Over the same period, claimants aged 55 years and over had the highest duration (11.7 weeks) among all age groups (consult Annex 2.18.2).

In total, 16.8% of completed claims for compassionate care benefits received the maximum number of 26 weeks of benefits in 2023‑24 (consult Table 57). This share was lower than the one reported in recent years, but similar to the one reported pre-pandemic. Among all completed claims in 2023‑24, a higher proportion of men used all 26 weeks of benefits (19.1%) compared to women (15.7%), although both shares were down from the previous fiscal year. Claimants aged 24 years and under (20.1%) and those aged 55 years and over (19.7%) were more likely to use all 26 weeks of compassionate care benefits compared to claimants aged 25 to 54 years (15.1%).

2.6.6 Employment Insurance family caregiver benefits for adults

The EI family caregiver benefits for adults took effect on December 3, 2017. It offers temporary income support to any eligible person who needs to take temporary leave from work to provide care or support for a person aged 18 years or over who is critically ill or injured. Family caregivers can receive these benefits for up to 15 weeks, which may be received consecutively or in separate periods. They can also be paid to a single caregiver or shared among eligible family members and other eligible individuals who are considered to be like family.

Claimants must provide Service Canada with a medical certificate issued by the medical doctor or nurse practitioner of the critically ill or injured family member. To be considered critically ill or injured, a person must have experienced a significant change in their baseline state of health because of illness or injury, placing the person's life at risk and necessitating the care or support of at least 1 caregiver. Caregivers are not eligible for benefits if the person is already living with a chronic medical condition, unless the person experiences a significant health change due to a new and acute life-threatening event.

Employment Insurance claims for the family caregiver benefits for adults, amount paid and level of benefits

In 2023‑24, approximately 14,100 claims were established for the family caregiver benefits for adults (consult Table 58). Compared to the previous fiscal year, the distribution of claims by region remained relatively stable, with Ontario accounting for nearly half (49.3%) of claims established.

Table 58 – Employment Insurance claims for the family caregiver benefits for adults and amount paid by region, gender and age group, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24*
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ thousands) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ thousands) 2023‑24
Newfound and Labrador 188 178 $1,125.2 $1,054.6
Prince Edward Island 81 96 $419.6 $543.0
Nova Scotia 356 381 $1,925.5 $2,071.2
New Brunswick 265 286 $1,477.7 $1,629.3
Quebec 2,137 2,088 $12,128.7 $11,643.5
Ontario** 6,542 6,970 $36,280.1 $37,190.4
Manitoba 487 482 $2,553.4 $2,785.9
Saskatchewan 323 355 $1,857.1 $2,031.1
Alberta 1,286 1,478 $7,463.0 $8,511.2
British Columbia 1,568 1,778 $9,191.3 $10,048.0
Territories 39 43 $276.4 $278.4
Men 4,520 4,978 $27,221.9 $29,630.1
Women 8,752 9,157 $47,476.2 $48,156.4
24 years old and under 276 356 $1,177.6 $1,654.0
25 to 34 years old 1,764 1,995 $9,395.7 $10,578.9
35 to 44 years old 2,592 2,790 $14,245.6 $14,893.3
45 to 54 years old 3,728 3,843 $21,025.2 $21,627.0
55 to 64 years old 4,102 4,230 $24,119.8 $23,941.9
65 years old and over 810 921 $4,734.1 $5,091.4
Canada 13,272 14,135 $74,698.0 $77,786.5
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI family caregiver benefits for adults was paid.
  • * Due to revisions in EI administrative data, comparisons between 2023‑24 and previous fiscal years need to be made with caution. Consult the methodology box in Section 2.1.
  • ** Claims for which the region was unknown have been combined with Ontario for confidentiality purposes.
  • Consult Annex 2.19 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

In terms of gender, women continued to account for the majority of claims, representing 64.8% of the total. By age group, claimants aged 55 to 64 years continued to represent the largest share (29.9%) of claims established this fiscal year.

The total amount paid out for the family caregiver benefits for adults was $77.8 million in 2023‑24. Women continued to receive a larger share of the total benefits paid (61.9%) in 2023‑24. However, the share of benefits paid to men has gradually increased over the past few years, going from 33.2% in 2021‑22 to 38.1% in 2023‑24. In terms of age groups, claimants aged 55 to 64 years continued to receive the highest proportion of benefits paid out in 2023‑24, followed by claimants aged 45 to 54 years.

In 2023‑24, the average weekly benefit rate for the family caregiver benefits for adults was $554. On average, claimants from the Territories had the highest average weekly benefit rate ($582). In terms of gender, men had a higher average rate than women ($588 compared to $535), while claimants aged 25 to 34 years had the highest average rate among all age groups ($572), followed by claimants aged 35 to 44 years ($571) (consult Annex 2.19.3).

Duration of Employment Insurance family caregiver benefits for adults

Under the family caregiver benefits for adults, claimants are eligible for up to 15 weeks of benefits, which can be shared among eligible caregivers and divided into segments within the 52-week benefit period.

The average duration of completed claims for the EI family caregiver benefits for adults in 2023‑24 was 10.1 weeks. This was similar to 2022-23 (10.5 weeks). Claimants from Prince Edward Island had the highest average duration (11.2 weeks), while claimants from Ontario had the lowest (9.8 weeks). Men and women had similar average durations (10.1 weeks and 10.2 weeks, respectively). Across age groups, claimants aged 65 years and over had the highest average duration (11.6 weeks), compared to the other age groups, which ranged from 9.5 to 10.6 weeks (consult Annex 2.19.2).

2.6.7 Employment Insurance family caregiver benefits for children

The EI family caregiver benefits for children offers temporary income support to any eligible person who needs to take temporary leave from work to provide care or support for a child under 18 years of age who is critically ill or injured. Family caregivers can receive these benefits for up to 35 weeks, which may be received consecutively or in separate periods. They can also be paid to a single caregiver or shared among eligible family members and other individuals who are considered to be members of the family.

Claimants must provide Service Canada with a medical certificate issued by the medical doctor or nurse practitioner of the critically ill or injured child. To be considered critically ill, a child must have experienced a significant change in their baseline state of health because of illness or injury, placing the child's life at risk and necessitating the care or support of at least 1 caregiver. Caregivers are not eligible for benefits if the child is already living with a chronic medical condition, unless the child experiences a significant health change due to a new and acute life-threatening event.

Employment Insurance claims for the family caregiver benefits for children, amount paid and level of benefits

There were approximately 4,400 claims for the family caregiver benefits for children established in 2023‑24 (consult Table 59). Ontario and Quebec continued to account for the majority of claims established, representing 61.0% of the total. More claims for the family caregiver benefits for children were established by women (72.8%) than men (27.2%), and claimants aged 25 to 44 years established the majority of claims (80.8%) during the reporting period.

Table 59 – Employment Insurance claims for the family caregiver benefits for children and amount paid by region, gender and age group, Canada, 2022‑23 and 2023‑24*
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ thousands) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ thousands) 2023‑24
Newfound and Labrador 47 48 $394.2 $341.4
Prince Edward Island 30 23 $197.9 $147.0
Nova Scotia 108 115 $823.0 $958.5
New Brunswick 132 79 $906.9 $659.8
Quebec 1,119 1,068 $7,512.1 $7,699.9
Ontario** 2,332 1,630 $17,279.2 $12,460.3
Manitoba 209 158 $1,537.6 $1,280.2
Saskatchewan 233 143 $1,506.6 $1,248.1
Alberta 889 611 $5,771.6 $4,771.4
British Columbia 734 533 $5,006.7 $3,908.8
Territories 22 14 $226.0 $125.6
Men 1,445 1,203 $10,317.4 $8,991.6
Women 4,410 3,219 $30,844.4 $24,609.2
24 years old and under 181 151 $963.9 $844.8
25 to 44 years old*** 5,010 3,573 $33,844.9 $26,661.4
45 to 54 years old 581 617 $5,749.2 $5,345.4
55 years old and over 83 81 $603.7 $749.3
Canada 5,855 4,422 $41,161.7 $33,600.8
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims for which at least $1 of EI family caregiver benefits for children was paid.
  • * Due to revisions in EI administrative data, comparisons between 2023‑24 and previous fiscal years need to be made with caution. Consult the methodology box in Section 2.1.
  • ** For confidentiality purposes, claims for which the region was unknown have been combined with Ontario.
  • *** For confidentiality purposes, claims for which the age group was unknown have been combined with the 25 to 44 years old category.
  • Consult Annex 2.20 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on 100% of data.

The total amount paid for the family caregiver benefits for children was $33.6 million in 2023‑24. As in previous years, women and claimants aged 25 to 44 years continued to receive the majority of benefits paid in 2023‑24 (73.2% and 79.3% respectively).

The average weekly benefit rate for family caregivers for children was $558 for claims established in 2023‑24. On average, the highest weekly benefit rates were paid for claims established by men ($598) and by claimants aged between 25 and 44 years ($564) (consult Annex 2.20.3).

Duration of Employment Insurance family caregiver benefits for children

Under the family caregiver benefits for children, claimants are eligible for up to 35 weeks of benefits, which can be shared among eligible caregivers and divided into segments within the 52-week benefit period.

In 2023‑24, the average duration of completed claims for the EI family caregiver benefits for children was 15.2 weeks. On average, women used more weeks of benefits than men, with 16.3 weeks and 13.1 weeks respectively. Claimants aged 45 to 54 years and those aged 55 years and over used the highest average number of weeks of benefits, with each group having an average duration of 17.1 weeks (consult Annex 2.20.2).

2.6.8 Employment Insurance special benefits for self‑employed persons

Self‑employed persons may make a claim for EI special benefits after signing up for the EI program. The special benefits available to self‑employed persons are the same as those offered to salaried employees.

To be eligible for EI special benefits for self‑employed persons, an individual must:

  • register with Service Canada and enter into an agreement with the Canada EI Commission
  • pay EI premiums at the same rate as salaried employees for at least one year before they may claim benefits
  • wait for 12 months from the date of their confirmed registration before claiming EI special benefits
  • have earned the minimum net amount of self‑employed earnings during the calendar year preceding the year they apply for benefitsFootnote 76
  • have reduced the amount of time devoted to their business by more than 40% for at least one week, and
  • meet the eligibility criteria specific to the special benefits being claimedFootnote 77

As soon as a self‑employed person receives EI benefits, they would have to pay premiums on their self‑employment earnings for the rest of their self‑employment career. Those who also have paid employment earnings have the choice to apply for EI special benefits as self‑employed persons or as insured claimants (if they have paid EI premiums through their paid employment). If they claim benefits under the former, their benefits would be calculated based on both self‑employment and paid employment income, whereas for the latter, only earnings from paid employment would be taken into account. The choice between EI special benefits as self-employed persons or as insured claimants (including fishers) is final and binding.

In 2023‑24, the number of participating self‑employed persons who entered into a voluntary agreement with Service Canada increased by close to 4,700, bringing the total number of participating self‑employed persons just under 57,400 (consult Table 60). Despite this increase, the number of annual enrolments has been trending downwards since 2020‑21, with numbers reaching below pre-pandemic levels.

Table 60 – Number of self-employed persons registered in the Employment Insurance program, Canada, 2019‑20 to 2023‑24
Enrolment 2019‑20 2020‑21 2021‑22 2022‑23 2023‑24
Net enrolments 6,572 12,778 5,268 4,792 4,676
New participants to the program (opted in) 7,775 17,932 6,747 6,007 5,985
Registrants who cancelled or terminated participation (opted out) -1,203 -5,154 -1,479 -1,215 -1,309
Cumulative total, at the end of the fiscal year 29,858 42,636 47,904 52,696 57,372

Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Service Canada administrative data. Results are based on a 100% sample of data.

Employment Insurance special benefits for self‑employed persons, claims, amount paid and level of benefits

In 2023‑24, a total of just under 1,300 special benefit claims were established by self‑employed persons, which is slightly higher than the previous fiscal year (consult Table 61). The benefit types most frequently received by self‑employed EI claimants were maternity benefits and parental benefits.

Table 61 – Employment Insurance special benefit claims for self-employed persons and amount paid by benefit type, region, gender and age, Canada, 2022‑23 to 2023‑24
Category New claims established 2022‑23 New claims established 2023‑24 Amount paid ($ thousands) 2022‑23 Amount paid ($ thousands) 2023‑24
Benefit type: maternity 738 774 $4,208.2 $4,578.0
Benefit type: parental 839 925 $9,675.6 $10,813.3
Benefit type: other special benefits 363 399 $922.9 $1,466.5
Atlantic 69 107 $748.9 $1,084.8
Quebec 49 77 $136.2 $284.2
Ontario 457 513 $5,931.9 $6,692.8
Prairies 256 256 $3,118.8 $3,454.7
British Columbia and the Territories 339 319 $4,870.8 $5,341.2
Men 101 123 $372.6 $541.3
Women 1,069 1,149 $14,434.1 $16,316.4
29 years old and under 175 164 $2,127.7 $2,342.5
30 to 39 years old 767 843 $11,319.5 $12,441.0
40 to 54 years old 162 195 $1,168.1 $1,759.3
55 years old and over 66 63 $191.4 $314.9
Canada 1,170 1,272 $14,806.7 $16,857.7
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding. Includes claims to self-employed persons for which at least $1 in EI special benefits was paid. New claims established by benefit type may not sum as claimants can receive multiple benefit types on a single claim.
  • Consult Annex 2.11 for more details.
  • Source: Employment and Social Development Canada, Employment Insurance (EI) administrative data. Results are based on a 100% sample of data.

In 2023‑24, Ontario is the region that established the largest number of claims for self-employed persons, with a share of 40.3% of total claims, while Quebec had the lowest number of claims. Quebec continued to be under‑represented in new claims established due to the fact that the province offers maternity, parental, adoption and paternity benefits under the Quebec Parental Insurance Plan with mandatory participation of self‑employed persons (consult subsections 2.6.2 and 2.6.3). The Atlantic region had the biggest increase in the number of claims established compared to the previous fiscal year (consult Table 61).

Consistent with past trends, women made up the vast majority (90.3%) of new claims established for self‑employed persons. By age, claimants between 30 and 39 years old accounted for the largest share of new claims (66.3%). This is mainly attributable to the fact that most benefits received by self‑employed EI claimants are maternity and parental benefits. Conversely, claimants aged 55 years and over represented the smallest share of new claims (5.0%).

The total amount paid in EI special benefits to self‑employed persons was $16.9 million for the reporting period, compared to $14.8 million in the previous fiscal year. Similar to the breakdown of claims by region, the largest proportion of special benefits was paid to Ontario (39.7%), while the smallest proportion was paid to Quebec (1.7%). This proportion of benefits paid to Quebec was lower than the share of claims established in the province over the fiscal year (6.1%).

As observed with claims, women received the largest share of the total special benefits paid to self‑employed persons in 2023‑24 (96.8%). In terms of age group, claimants aged between 30 and 39 years old also continued to receive the largest share of special benefits paid to self‑employed persons (73.8%).

In 2023‑24, the average weekly benefit rate for self‑employed persons was $400.Footnote 78 On average, during the whole fiscal year, the highest weekly benefit rate was for claims established in British Columbia and the Territories ($446), by women ($405) and by those between the ages of 30 and 39 ($415).

2.7 Employment Insurance financial information

In this section

Employers and employees across Canada make mandatory premium contributions to the EI program. These contributions are based on the employees' insurable earnings up to the annual Maximum Insurable Earnings (MIE) threshold.Footnote 79 Since January 2010, self-employed individuals who have opted into the EI program also pay EI premiums in order to be eligible for EI special benefits.

All EI premiums and other types of revenues (such as interest and penalties) related to the EI program under the authority of the Employment Insurance Act are first deposited into the Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF) and then credited to the EI Operating Account (the Account).Footnote 80 All EI benefits paid and administrative costs provided for under the Employment Insurance Act are paid out of the CRF and debited from the Account.

The following section provides information on EI premium rates and recent trends in revenues and expenditures recorded for the Account.

2.7.1 Employment Insurance premium rate

As defined in the Employment Insurance Act, since April 1, 2016, the Canada Employment Insurance Commission (the Commission) has been responsible for setting the EI premium rate. According to the Employment Insurance Act, the premium rate is set according to a 7‑year break-even rate (under which the projected balance for the Account is expected to be $0 in 7 years), as forecasted by the EI Senior Actuary. As such, EI program expenditures are matched by premium contributions to ensure that the Account is in cumulative balance by the end of a 7‑year period. In addition, annual changes to the EI premium rate are legislatively limited to increases or decreases of no more than 5 cents per year.Footnote 81 The 7‑year forecast break-even rate and the 5‑cent limit on annual changes ensure stable and predictable premium rates for employees and employers.Footnote 82 Employers pay EI premiums that are 1.4 times the employee rate.

The EI premiums are paid by employers, employees and self-employed persons who have opted into the EI program, for every $100 of insurable earnings up to the annual MIE threshold. In 2024, the MIE was $63,200, increasing by $1,700 (+2.8%) from the previous year's MIE of $61,500.

The EI program grants a reduction in EI premiums to employees and employers who are covered by a provincial plan that reduces or eliminates EI special benefits payable in that province. Since January 1, 2006, Quebec is the only province in Canada that has been administering its own provincial plan, known as the Quebec Parental Insurance Plan (QPIP). The QPIP provides parental, adoption, maternity, and paternity benefits to eligible claimants and is financed by premiums paid by wage earners, self-employed workers, and employers in Quebec. These benefits replace maternity and parental benefits provided by the EI program and, as such, EI premiums in Quebec are lowered to reflect the savings that are generated for the EI program as a result of the existence of the QPIP.

In 2024, the EI premium rate for employees (who were not covered by a provincial parental insurance plan) was $1.66 per $100 of insurable earnings. This was an increase of 3 cents from $1.63 per $100 of insurable earnings in 2023, less than the maximum 5 cents allowed under the Employment Insurance Act.Footnote 83 As a result, the maximum annual EI premiums paid by employees in 2024 was $1,049.12.

As mentioned previously, employers pay EI premiums that are 1.4 times the employee rate such that employers contribute approximately 58% of the total EI premium revenues versus approximately 42% contributed by employees. This means that, in 2024, employers paid $2.32 ($2.324 unrounded) for every $100 of insurable earnings for each of their employees, up to a maximum of $1,468.77.

Self-employed persons who opted into the program to access special benefits pay the same EI premium rate as employees, and also pay premiums up to the MIE.Footnote 84 In 2024, the premium reduction to Quebec residents was 34 cents, resulting in an EI premium rate of $1.32 per $100 of insurable earnings for employees in Quebec, while employers paid $1.85 ($1.848 unrounded) per $100 of insurable earnings for each of their employees. Table 62 summarizes this information for the past 6 years.

Table 62 – Employment Insurance maximum insurable earnings, premium rates* and annual maximum contributions for employees and employers in Canada, 2019 to 2024
Category 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Employee premium rates for residents of a province without a provincial parental insurance plan $1.620 $1.580 $1.580 $1.580 $1.630 $1.660
Employer premium rates for residents of a province without a provincial parental insurance plan $2.268 $2.212 $2.212 $2.212 $2.282 $2.324
Employee premium rates for residents of a province with a provincial parental insurance plan (Quebec) $1.250 $1.200 $1.180 $1.200 $1.270 $1.320
Employer premium rates for residents of a province with a provincial parental insurance plan (Quebec) $1.750 $1.680 $1.652 $1.680 $1.778 $1.848
Employees' maximum insurable earnings $53,100 $54,200 $56,300 $60,300 $61,500 $63,200
Employee annual maximum contribution $860.22 $856.36 $889.54 $952.74 $1,002.45 $1,049.12
Employer annual maximum contribution $1,204.31 $1,198.90 $1,245.36 $1,333.84 $1,403.43 $1,468.77

Example: Employment Insurance premium contributions

Olivia is an employee working at a call centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia, and earns $45,000 per year.

Based on Olivia's income level and assuming she remained employed throughout the year; her annual contribution to the EI program in 2024 would be $747.00 at the premium rate of $1.66 for every $100 of insurable earnings. Her employer would contribute $1,045.80 in EI premiums on her insurable earnings, for a combined total of $1,792.80 in contributions made to the Account in 2024.

However, if Olivia was working and living in Quebec, her annual EI contribution in 2024 would be reduced to $594.00, and her employer would have contributed $831.60 in EI premiums on her earnings, for a combined total of $1,425.60 in contributions made to the Account. As wage earners in Quebec paid a Quebec Parental Insurance Plan (QPIP) premium rate of $0.494 for every $100 of insurable earnings in 2024, Olivia's contribution to the QPIP would be $222.30, while her employer's contribution would be $311.40 (at the employers' premium rate of $0.692 for every $100 of insurable earnings for each of their employees). Note that QPIP premiums are set by the Quebec Parental Insurance Plan's Conseil de gestion and not by the Commission.

Chart 27 illustrates the EI premium rates for employees and employers over the past 10 years in Quebec and the rest of Canada.Footnote 85 The Government froze the 2014 premium rate for employees at the 2013 level of $1.88 per $100 of insurable earnings and legislated the 2015 and 2016 rates at that amount. The 2021 and 2022 rates were frozen at the 2020 premium rate level of $1.58 per $100 of insurable earnings, as part of the Government's economic response to COVID-19.

Chart 27 – Employment Insurance premium rates (rounded) per $100 of insurable earnings, Canada, 2014 to 2024
Chart 27: description follows
Text description for Chart 27
Category 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Employee contributions – Canada except Quebec $1.88 $1.88 $1.88 $1.63 $1.66 $1.62 $1.58 $1.58 $1.58 $1.63 $1.66
Employer contributions – Canada except Quebec $2.63 $2.63 $2.63 $2.28 $2.32 $2.27 $2.21 $2.21 $2.21 $2.28 $2.32
Employee contributions – Quebec $1.53 $1.54 $1.52 $1.27 $1.30 $1.25 $1.20 $1.18 $1.20 $1.27 $1.32
Employer contributions – Quebec $2.14 $2.16 $2.13 $1.78 $1.82 $1.75 $1.68 $1.65 $1.68 $1.78 $1.85

Source: EI premium rates and maximums – Calculate payroll deductions and contributions

2.7.2 Premium refund provision

Under certain circumstances, a share or all of EI premiums paid can be refunded to contributors.

The EI program includes a provision that grants EI premium refunds to employees with insurable earnings equal to or less than $2,000 in a given calendar year, as they are unlikely to qualify for EI benefits. In addition to this, some employees, such as those with multiple jobs or those who change jobs during the year, may pay EI premiums on earnings that exceed the MIE and the maximum annual contribution in a given tax year. Under these circumstances, affected employees are entitled to receive a refund of all or a portion of their EI premiums paid in the year when filing their income tax returns. However, employers do not receive a corresponding refund.

According to Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) data on T4 slips from employers, there were 837,181 individuals in 2022 (the most recent taxation year for which data is available) that were eligible to receive full EI premium refunds under the Premium Refund Provision, representing 4.3% of those with insurable earnings.Footnote 86 Of these individuals who were eligible to receive full refunds on their EI premiums, 73.3% (613,663 individuals) had filed income taxes and 65.8% of those who were eligible (551,274 individuals) received a full premium refund based on CRA T1 tax filer data. A total of $7.8 million in premiums were refunded to the eligible individuals in 2022. On average, each eligible individuals received $14.20 in EI premiums refunded.

Employment Insurance premium refund provision

A department study* used administrative income tax data (T1 and T4 tax records) from 2006 to 2021 to examine how the number and profile of individuals who received the EI premium refund has changed over the period. Furthermore, it analyzed the characteristics of individuals who would have received the premium refund if the threshold was indexed based on inflation or the minimum wage to account for wage increases over time. Finally, the study investigated the probability of low-income earners to be eligible for the EI premium refund if the threshold was indexed based on inflation or the minimum wage.

The study found that the total number of individuals with employment income has increased while the number of individuals eligible for the EI premium refund has decreased over the studied period. The share of workers eligible for the EI premium refund dropped from 4.2% in 2006 to 3.1% in 2021 and the average refund amount decreased from $18 in 2006 to $15 in 2021 due to a decrease in the EI premium rate.

The study also showed that the average age of individuals eligible for the EI premium refund has increased since 2006. This is in part explained by an increasing share of older workers, around the age of 65, who earned less than $2,000 and became eligible for the refund. The study found that younger low-income earners would have benefited the most from the threshold indexation. In addition, a higher share of low total income individuals as well as those with a spouse with low total income would have received the EI premium refund under a threshold indexation scenario.

Lastly, the study found that low-income earners under 20 years old, those paying union dues, those working in regions with higher unemployment as well as students were more likely to benefit from the threshold indexation (inflation and minimum wage) compared to the group under the current threshold.

* ESDC, EI Premium Refunds (Ottawa: ESDC, Evaluation Directorate, 2024).

2.7.3 Premium reduction program

The Premium Reduction Program (PRP) was introduced in 1971 to encourage employers to provide short-term income protection coverage plans to their employees. The PRP recognized employer-based plans that already existed and encouraged employers to continue to offer them as EI sickness benefits became available.

Under the Employment Insurance Act, employers who provide qualified wage-loss plans, also known as short-term disability plans, to their employees that are at least equivalent to the protection provided by EI sickness benefits may be eligible to receive a reduction in the EI premiums payable through the PRP. The PRP puts less strain on the EI program as employees who are covered by such short-term disability plans may not have to collect EI benefits, or may collect them for a shorter period of time, as benefits from the registered plans provided by employers have to be paid before EI benefits are paid.

There are 2 types of wage-loss replacement plans for which EI premium reductions may be granted: cumulative paid sick leave plans and weekly indemnity programs. These plans must also meet certain requirements established by the Commission.Footnote 87 The premium reduction reflects the average savings generated to the EI Account due to the existence of these plans, and is provided directly to employers. As EI premiums are paid by both employers and employees in a proportion of 7/12 and 5/12, respectively, employers are required to ensure that their employees benefit from the reduction of the employers' premium in an amount at least equal to 5/12 of the reduction.

In each calendar year, the rates of premium reduction are established based on 4 categories of qualified plans, with a distinct rate for each category, as explained below:

  • category 1: cumulative paid sick leave plans that allow for a minimum monthly accumulation of 1 day and for a total accumulation of at least 75 days
  • category 2: cumulative paid sick leave plans that allow for a minimum monthly accumulation of one and two-third days and for a total accumulation of at least 125 days
  • category 3: weekly indemnity plans with a benefit period of at least 15 weeks
  • category 4: weekly indemnity plans with a benefit period of at least 52 weeks (this reduction is available only to public and para-public employers of a province)

Rates of premium reduction are expressed as a percentage of the insurable earnings of employees. In 2024, the rates of reduction were 0.23%, 0.37%, 0.37% and 0.41% of insurable earnings for categories 1 through 4, respectively.Footnote 88 Premiums were reduced by an estimated $1,195.3 million due to wage-loss plans in 2022 (the most recent taxation year for which data is available), compared to $1,135.2 million in 2021 and $1,023.0 million in 2020.Footnote 89

An internal analysis on the PRP estimated that there were approximately 24,000 employers receiving EI premium reductions through the PRP in 2019, representing 1.8% of all employers. About 6.4 million workers were covered by a short-term disability plan offered by their employers under the PRP in 2019. This analysis also shows that, during the period of 2015 to 2019, approximately 89.0% of all employers in the program offered a category 3 plan with weekly indemnity to their employees. Another 9.0% of employers offered category 1 with cumulative paid sick leave plans, followed by 2.0% offering category 2 of short-term disability plan. Less than 1.0% of employers offered a category 4 plan.Footnote 90 These breakdowns were stable across the 4 years examined.

2.7.4 Recent trends in revenues and expenditures

As required by Section 64 of the Financial Administration Act, the Receiver General prepares the Public Accounts of Canada annually to report on the financial transactions of the Government for the fiscal year. According to the Public Accounts of Canada, EI revenues were $30.3 billion in 2023‑24, up from $27.5 billion (+10.2%) from the previous year. Over the same period, EI expenditures increased from $24.2 billion in 2022‑23 to $26.3 billion in 2023‑24 ($2.1 billion or 8.7%) (consult Table 63).

EI expenditures in 2023‑24 have returned at their pre-pandemic levels. The Account had an annual surplus of $3.7 billion by the end of 2023‑24 (consult Table 63).

Table 63 – Employment Insurance Operating Account revenues and expenditures, Canada, 2019‑20 to 2023‑24 ($ million)
Operating Account 2019‑20 2020‑21 2021‑22 2022‑23 2023‑24
Revenues * $22,713.7 $22,896.5 $24,333.7 $27,472.9 $30,273.1
Premiums 99.7% 99.9% 99.9% 99.8% 99.6%
Interest and penalties 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4%
Expenditures ** $23,724.8 $61,838.3 $41,504.9 $24,194.9 $26,307.2
Employment Insurance benefits (Part I) 74.8% 51.0% 89.1% 81.3% 80.9%
Employment benefits and support measures (Part II) 10.4% 4.0% 6.1% 10.3% 9.6%
Benefit repayments -1.0% -0.4% -1.2% -1.1% -1.1%
Employment Insurance Emergency Response Benefit*** 7.4% 39.9% 0.0% -0.3% -1.5%
Administration costs 8.0% 4.1% 6.4% 11.2% 11.0%
Bad debts 0.3% 1.5% -0.1% -1.4% 1.1%
Funding from the Government of Canada – Employment Insurance Emergency Response Benefit**** n/a 27,331.4 (94.7) (483.4) (225.8)
Annual surplus (deficit) ($1,011.1) ($11,610.3) ($17,265.9) $2,794.7 $3,740.0
  • Note: Data may not add up to the total due to rounding.
  • * Includes all revenues and funding from EI premiums, interest owed on accounts receivable, penalties applied to claimants for violations of terms and conditions of the EI program and additional funding measures introduced for Employment Insurance under the federal budget.
  • ** Includes all expenses related to funding and operations of the EI program, including benefit payments under Part I of the EI program, Employment Benefit and Support Measure (EBSM) expenditures under Part II of the EI program, EI benefit repayments, administrative costs and outstanding debts counted as liabilities against the EI Operating Account.
  • *** The Employment Insurance Emergency Response Benefit is the portion of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit that was administered by Employment and Social Development Canada. Expenses related to the EI Emergency Response Benefit were paid from the EI Operating Account and are included in this financial statement.
  • **** Pursuant to section 153.111 of the Employment Insurance Act, the Account was credited the reported amount determined by the Minister of Finance that corresponds to the total cost of the EI Emergency Response Benefit (EI-ERB), including all costs related to the benefit and its administration. The funding from the Government of Canada is recognized in the period in which the transfer is authorized. Funding recognized is comprised of EI-ERB expenditures, incremental costs related to the administration of the EI-ERB, overpayments established and bad debts related expense.
  • Source: Government of Canada, Public Accounts of Canada 2024, Volume I: Summary Report and Consolidated Financial Statements (Ottawa: Receiver General for Canada, 2024) and past year versions of the Public Accounts Report.

Chart 28 shows the financial position of the Account at the end of the fiscal year for the past 10 years. On March 31, 2024, the accumulated deficit was $18.4 billion, down from the $22.2 billion at the end of the previous fiscal year. The reduction in the accumulated deficit this year compared to last year is mainly attributable to the growth in revenues, due to the increased premium rate and MIE, in relation to the expenses paid out.

Chart 28 – Employment Insurance Operating Account financial position at the end of the fiscal year, Canada, 2014‑15 to 2023‑24
Chart 28: description follows
Text description for Chart 28
Fiscal year 2014‑15 2015‑16 2016‑17 2017‑18 2018‑19 2019‑20 2020‑21 2021‑22 2022‑23 2023‑24
Accumulated surplus/deficit at the end of the fiscal year ($ billion) $0.52 $2.91 $3.00 $2.95 $4.92 $3.90 -$7.71 -$24.97 -$22.18 -$18.44

Source: Government of Canada, Public Accounts of Canada 2024, Volume I: Summary Report and Consolidated Financial Statements (Ottawa: Receiver General for Canada, 2024) and past year versions of the Public Accounts Report.

Page details

Date modified: