Annex B – Summary of findings
Relevance
| Evaluation question | Acceptable | Opportunity for improvement | Attention required | Unable to assess | Not applicable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Continued need for the program |
⚫ | - | - | - | - |
| 2. Aligned to federal government priorities |
⚫ | - | - | - | - |
| 3. Program consistent with federal roles and responsibilities |
⚫ | - | - | - | - |
Performance
| Evaluation question | Acceptable | Opportunity for improvement | Attention required | Unable to assess | Not applicable |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Achievement of intended outcomes |
- | - | - | - | - |
| Immediate Outcome 1: Effective actions to manage nutrients | ⚫ | - | - | - | - |
| Immediate Outcome 2: Lake Winnipeg groups are aware of and apply for funding | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
| Immediate Outcome 3: Increased partner and stakeholder collaboration/ coherence and coordination of federal actions | ⚫ | - | - | - | - |
| Immediate Outcome 4: State of the Lake Indicators are established and tracked | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
| Immediate Outcome 5: Use of predictive capability to model nutrient scenarios | ⚫ | - | - | - | - |
| Immediate Outcome 6: Increased scientific knowledge and data to support decision making | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
| Intermediate Outcome 1: Reduced nutrients in the Lake Winnipeg Basin | - | - | ⚫ | - | - |
| Intermediate Outcome 2: The Province of Manitoba / transboundary management bodies establish nutrient objectives | ⚫ | - | - | - | - |
| Final Outcome: Improvement to the ecological health of Lake Winnipeg | - | - | - | ⚫ | - |
| Unintended outcomes | - | - | - | - | ⚫ |
| Program design appropriate for achieving expected program results | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
| Governance clear, appropriate and efficient | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
| Program is implemented in an efficient and economical manner | ⚫ | - | - | - | - |
| Performance data collected and reported | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |