Annex B – Summary of findings
Relevance
Evaluation question | Acceptable | Opportunity for improvement | Attention required | Unable to assess | Not applicable |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Continued need for the program |
⚫ | - | - | - | - |
2. Aligned to federal government priorities |
⚫ | - | - | - | - |
3. Program consistent with federal roles and responsibilities |
⚫ | - | - | - | - |
Performance
Evaluation question | Acceptable | Opportunity for improvement | Attention required | Unable to assess | Not applicable |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Achievement of intended outcomes |
- | - | - | - | - |
Immediate Outcome 1: Effective actions to manage nutrients | ⚫ | - | - | - | - |
Immediate Outcome 2: Lake Winnipeg groups are aware of and apply for funding | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
Immediate Outcome 3: Increased partner and stakeholder collaboration/ coherence and coordination of federal actions | ⚫ | - | - | - | - |
Immediate Outcome 4: State of the Lake Indicators are established and tracked | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
Immediate Outcome 5: Use of predictive capability to model nutrient scenarios | ⚫ | - | - | - | - |
Immediate Outcome 6: Increased scientific knowledge and data to support decision making | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
Intermediate Outcome 1: Reduced nutrients in the Lake Winnipeg Basin | - | - | ⚫ | - | - |
Intermediate Outcome 2: The Province of Manitoba / transboundary management bodies establish nutrient objectives | ⚫ | - | - | - | - |
Final Outcome: Improvement to the ecological health of Lake Winnipeg | - | - | - | ⚫ | - |
Unintended outcomes | - | - | - | - | ⚫ |
Program design appropriate for achieving expected program results | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
Governance clear, appropriate and efficient | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
Program is implemented in an efficient and economical manner | ⚫ | - | - | - | - |
Performance data collected and reported | - | ⚫ | - | - | - |
Page details
- Date modified: