Acceptable Claims for Articles Treated with Antimicrobial Preservatives

Pest Management Regulatory Agency
12 March 2024

(PDF Version - 354 KB)

Document history (revision/update)
Updated Update/Rationale:
12 March 2024 This document introduces more comprehensive definitions and explanations about treated articles. Additionally, it references the amendments to the Pest Control Products Regulations (PCPR) that came into force in 2023.
December 2018 Initial release of document.

Table of Contents

Disclaimer

This document does not constitute part of the Pest Control Products Act (PCPA) or its regulations and in the event of any inconsistency or conflict between the Act or regulations and this document, the Act or the regulations take precedence. This document is an administrative document that is intended to facilitate compliance by the regulated party with the Act, the regulations and the applicable administrative policies.

1.0 Introduction

An antimicrobial preservative used to treat an article is always required to be registered or otherwise authorizedFootnote 1 under the Pest Control Products Act for that use. Claims made about an article treated with an antimicrobial preservative must be consistent with the approved label for that antimicrobial preservative. This document provides general guidance on acceptable labelling claims for articles treated with antimicrobial preservatives. It is intended to help registrants or users of antimicrobial preservatives, as well as distributors and retailers of articles treated with antimicrobial preservatives, to be compliant with the regulatory requirement under subsection 6(7) of the Pest Control Products Act with regard to packaging and advertisement of pest control products. It is the responsibility of manufacturers, importers, retailers and distributors of treated articles to ensure that the claims associated to the articles treated with antimicrobial preservatives are consistent with the guidance provided in this document, as well as in Regulatory Directive 2016-01: Guidelines for the Advertising of Pest Control Products, available from the Pesticides portion of Canada.ca. The amendments to the Pest Control Products Regulations that entered into force on 5 June 2023, clarify regulatory requirements for treated articles, establish criteria for authorizing certain treated articles and formally exempt certain antimicrobials used in products regulated under particular acts. Additional information on treated articles can be found in an Information Note on Treated Articles and a Questions and Answers document, both available from the Pesticides and Pest Management Reports and Publications webpage (under Fact Sheets and Other Resources).

The Pest Control Products Regulations define a treated article as: an inanimate product or substance but does not include food as defined in section 2 of the Food and Drugs Act,

  1. that, during the manufacturing process, is treated with a pest control product either by intentionally:
    • incorporating the product into the article; or
    • applying it to the article, and
  2. whose primary purpose, prior to that treatment, is not, directly or indirectly, to control, destroy, attract or repel a pest or to mitigate or prevent the injurious, noxious or troublesome effects of a pest.

Articles can be treated with pesticides such as antimicrobials (for example, textile treated with a preservative), insecticides (for example, insecticide-treated clothing), and herbicides (for example, herbicide-treated landscape fabric). A pesticide that has been intentionally incorporated into or applied to an article during manufacture for import, sale or use in Canada must be registered or otherwise authorized under the Pest Control Products Act.

2.0 Guiding principles for acceptable claims

  1. The claim may only reference the type of organism(s) for which the antimicrobial preservative was registered (in other words, bacteria, fungi, mould and/or mildew, etc.). If the antimicrobial preservative label does not specifically reference the type of organism for which the product was registered, the claims about the treated article itself cannot refer to specific types/species of organisms. In such a case, only the general purpose of the treatment may be stated (for example, "This article contains a preservative to extend its shelf life").
  2. Claims such as "antimicrobial" and "preservative" cannot be used alone and must be properly qualified. An example of a properly qualified claim would the following:

    "Treated with an antimicrobial that provides mildew-resistant dried paint coating."
  3. Labelling claims must not create false or misleading impressions. Label claims with respect to treated articles used in areas where food-borne or disease-causing organisms may be present have the potential to create the misleading impression that the article provides protection against such organisms. This should be addressed through very careful narrowing and qualification of the non-public health claims, as in the following examples:

    "This product does not protect users or others against food-borne (or disease-causing) bacteria. Always clean this product thoroughly after each use", or

    "This product does not protect users or others against bacteria, viruses, germs or other disease-causing organisms. Always clean this product thoroughly after each use."

  4. Claims should be limited to the effect of the antimicrobial treatment on the pest itself (for example, "prevents aesthetic disfigurement caused by mould"). A claim that goes beyond this in terms of alleged efficacy-related health benefits such as "prevents infection" or that identifies specific pathogens that do not appear on the approved label for the antimicrobial preservatives used to treat the article is not permitted. See Regulatory Directive DIR2016-01: Guidelines for the Advertising of Pest Control Products for more information.
  5. References to pesticide properties should not be given any greater prominence than any other described product feature. All references to the pesticidal properties and the required qualifying statements should be located together, should be printed in type of the same size, style and colour, and should be given equal prominence to any other described product feature.

3.0 Examples of acceptable labelling claims

Below are examples of acceptable labelling claims for articles treated with antimicrobial preservatives, provided they are consistent with the approved use pattern of the registered antimicrobial preservative used for treatment. The following examples are not intended to be an all-inclusive listing of acceptable claims.

3.1 In-can preservation (for example, paints, adhesives and household detergents)

3.2 Dry-film preservation (for example, paints, caulking and sealants)

3.3 Plastic preservation (for example, lawn furniture and garden hoses)

3.4 Textile preservation (for example, socks, canvas, tarps, tents and awnings)

3.5 Wood preservation (for example, joinery/millwork, wood for above ground and ground contact)

Footnotes

Footnote 1

For the purpose of this document, otherwise authorized refers to authorization under 21(5) of the Pest Control Products Act.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Page details

Date modified: