Yellow fever virus: Infectious substances pathogen safety data sheet

For more information on yellow fever virus, see the following:

Section I – Infectious agent

Name

Yellow fever virus

Agent type

Virus

Taxonomy

Family

Flaviviridae

Genus

Orthoflavivirus

Species

Orthoflavivirus flaviFootnote 1

Synonym or cross-reference

Causative agent of yellow fever, previously known as black vomitFootnote 2, yellow jackFootnote 3, yellow plague, Bronze John, Bulam fever, and saffron scourgeFootnote 4.

Characteristics

Brief description

Yellow fever virus (YFV) is an icosahedral enveloped virus with a diameter of approximately 40 nm. The viral envelope is derived from the host plasma membrane and is embedded with dimers of the viral envelope (E) glycoprotein and membrane (M) proteins that protrude up to 10 nmFootnote 5. The viral genome is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA molecule, approximately 11 kb in length, with a cap structure at the 5'-end and a very stable, highly conserved stem-loop structure at the 3'-end which acts to stabilize the genome and provides signals for initiation of translation and RNA synthesisFootnote 5Footnote 6.

Properties

YFV can tolerate and replicate at temperatures between 20–37°C (optimum 37°C) in mosquito salivary glandsFootnote 7. After inoculation, the virus is able to replicate in a susceptible hostFootnote 8. It does so by first infecting dendritic cells in the skin, which are also susceptible to virus infection in vitro. The lymphatic vessels then drain these cells to lymph nodes, where the virus is replicated and released into the bloodstream, causing initial viremia. Once in the hematogenous route, the virus infects the liver, kidneys, heart, spleen and other organs.

Section II – Hazard identification

Pathogenicity and toxicity

YFV causes yellow fever (YF), a disease described as the original viral hemorrhagic feverFootnote 5Footnote 9. Reports from West African outbreaks suggest that the ratio of symptomatic to asymptomatic cases of YFV infection is 1 in 3.8 to 1 in 7.4, suggesting that clinically overt disease occurs in 12-21% of YFV infectionsFootnote 10. The clinical course of YF is classically described in three phases. The infection phase is typically abrupt in onset and is characterized by flu-like symptoms such as fever with measured temperatures of up to 41°C in adults, myalgia, headache, joint pain and nauseaFootnote 11. Patients are usually viremic during this stage of the illness, with high viral titers of up to 105 to 106 viral particles/mLFootnote 9. This may be followed by a short remission phase (2 to 48 hours in duration), with resolution of fever and improvement in clinical symptoms. Patients with mild disease may recover at this phase, without subsequent progression to more severe disease. Approximately 12–20% of YFV-infected individuals progress to the intoxication phase, which occurs within 3 to 6 days after onset of initial symptoms and is characterized by the recurrence of high fever, as well as abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, renal failure, oliguria, and jaundiceFootnote 5Footnote 11Footnote 12. Hemorrhagic manifestations occur during this phase and include petechiae, ecchymoses, epistaxis (nosebleeds), oozing of blood from gums and needle puncture sites, hematuria (blood in urine), melena (blood in the stool), hematemesis (vomiting of blood), and metrorrhagia (prolonged menstrual bleeding)Footnote 5Footnote 9Footnote 13. Notably, myocardial injury, represented via wave abnormalities on electrocardiograms, has also been reported in patientsFootnote 9. Encephalopathy and other changes in the brain can also be reported and are often due to increased cerebrospinal pressure and edema rather than viral encephalitisFootnote 9, although encephalitis due to YFV is extremely rareFootnote 14. Symptoms of encephalopathy include delirium, stupor, coma, Cheyne-Stokes respirations, metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, hypoglycemia, and hypothermiaFootnote 15Footnote 16. Based off a systematic literature review, the case fatality rate of YFV is estimated to be approximately 39%Footnote 17. An estimated 20 to 50% of YF patients with hepatorenal involvement during the disease (i.e., progression to the period of intoxication) have a fatal outcomeFootnote 9.

Epidemiology

YFV is currently endemic in 34 countries in Africa and 13 countries in South AmericaFootnote 18. The virus can be classified into two major clades: the first clade encompasses four genotypes, two in West Africa and two in South America, whereas the second clade includes three genotypes identified in Central/East AfricaFootnote 18. The virus is maintained in nature by transmission between non-human primates (NHPs), horizontal transmission via blood-feeding mosquitoes, and transovarial transmission in competent vectorsFootnote 18. There are 3 transmission cycles; sylvatic (or jungle), urban, and intermediate (savannah)Footnote 19. The sylvatic cycle involves the transmission of the virus between non-human primates and tree-hole breeding mosquitoes, such as Aedes africanus, A. luteocephalus, A. opok, and the A. simpsoni group in Africa and Haemagogus species in South AmericaFootnote 19Footnote 20. The urban cycle is less common but was responsible for historical outbreaks in Europe and North America and involves the transmission in densely populated regions between humans and domesticated mosquitoes like A. aegyptiFootnote 5Footnote 16. The intermediate cycle occurs only in Africa, and is between humans living close to jungle boarders and tree-hole-breeding anthropophilic mosquito species such as A. africanus, A. luteocephalus, A. opok, and the A. simpsoni groupFootnote 16Footnote 21. Since NHPs represent one of the reservoirs, YFV cannot be eradicated. In addition, infected humans can also contribute to YFV transmission, infecting mosquitoes during periods of viremia. There is an estimated 200,000 cases of YF and 30,000 deaths every year, 90% of which occur in AfricaFootnote 22.

From 2016-2018, YFV outbreaks were reported in both endemic and non-endemic areas in Africa and South America with historically low vaccination coverageFootnote 23. The largest YF outbreak in 30 years was reported in Angola in 2016-2017, an endemic area where YFV activity is infrequent and the vaccination coverage is lower than in West Africa, with subsequent spread to the Democratic Republic of Congo and possibly Uganda. From December 2015 to October 2016, 884 confirmed cases and 121 deaths were reported in these countries, triggering the mass vaccination of 30 million people. The largest YFV outbreak recorded in Africa occurred along the River Omo, in southwestern Ethiopia, between 1960 and 1962, resulting in approximately 200,000 cases and 30,000 deathsFootnote 21. In 1966, YFV appeared in Arba Minch in South Ethiopia, in an area previously unaffected in the 1960 epidemic, and therefore was excluded from the mass vaccination campaign at the time. During this outbreak, 2200 cases and 450 deaths were reported and the outbreak was confirmed through serological testingFootnote 24. YFV then re-emerged in South Omo in 2012-2014, and more recently in October 2018 in South West EthiopiaFootnote 21.

Individuals participating in occupational or recreational activities in forests have an increased risk of YFV infection via the sylvatic cycleFootnote 16Footnote 25. Infection is also more commonly reported in men than in women, likely due to the overrepresentation of men in these professionsFootnote 9.

Individuals older than 40 years were found to be more likely to succumb to YF than individuals under 40 yearsFootnote 26.

Host range

Natural host(s)

Humans, NHPs, and mosquitoes are the natural hostsFootnote 27. Susceptible animal species in Africa include monkeys of the genus Cercopithecus, chimpanzees (Pan spp.), mangabey (Cercocebus spp.), baboons (Papio spp.), bush babies (Galaga spp.), and possibly hedgehogs (Erinaceus spp.), whereas in Central and South America, YFV infection has been reported in capuchin, spider, howler, titi, and night monkeys, marmosets, and tamarinsFootnote 28Footnote 29Footnote 30.

Other host(s)

Mice and hamsters are experimentally infected hostsFootnote 31.

Infectious dose

Unknown for humans. Generally, the infectious dose for causative agents of viral hemorrhagic fever is approximately 1–10 organisms by aerosol in humansFootnote 32. Experimental evidence indicates that the 50% lethal dose in monkeys is less than 1 plaque-forming unitFootnote 9.

Incubation period

YF has an incubation period of 3 to 6 daysFootnote 5.

Communicability

The preferred mode of transmission is injection of infectious material via the bite of a YFV-infected mosquitoFootnote 5. Although there are no reported naturally acquired cases of YFV infection via contact with intact skin in humans or animals, historical experimental evidence in monkeys, suggested that YFV might be transmitted through the skin, although high viral titers would be necessaryFootnote 33. Contact of infectious material with mucous membranes or damaged skin is another possible route of transmissionFootnote 34. Experimental evidence in monkeys suggests that YFV can be transmitted via aerosols and by ingestionFootnote 34Footnote 35Footnote 36. Human-to-human transmission can occur via intimate direct contact through organ transplantation, blood transfusionFootnote 37, and vertical transmissionFootnote 34Footnote 38Footnote 39. Although YFV was shown not to be transmitted between individuals via contact with beddings of infected individualsFootnote 40, laboratory-acquired cases of infection have been reported after handling contaminated patient/animal materials, suggesting that indirect contact via fomites may be a rare route of human-to-human transmissionFootnote 34.

Section III – Dissemination

Reservoir

Humans in the urban cycle; NHPs in the sylvatic cycle; humans and NHPs in the intermediate cycleFootnote 18. In a serological survey conducted in French Guiana, anti-YFV antibodies were detected in 10 wild mammalian species of various orders or superorders, namely golden-handed tamarin, white-faced saki, and red howler monkeys (primates); agoutis and porcupines (Rodentia); collared peccary (artiodactyl); tayra (Carnivora); two-toed and three-toed sloths, and anteaters (Xenarthra), suggesting that non-primate mammalian species may play a role in transmissionFootnote 41.

Zoonosis

Indirect zoonosis occurs in the sylvatic cycle, which involves transmission of YFV between NHPs and tree-hole breeding mosquitoes, where humans may be sporadically infected when bitten by a YFV-infected mosquitoFootnote 11.

Vectors

The principal arthropod vectors of YFV differ depending on geographical location and transmission cycleFootnote 42. The urban transmission cycle is mediated by domesticated mosquito vectors, such as Aedes aegyptiFootnote 5. In the sylvatic cycle, YFV is transmitted between NHPs and tree-hole breeding mosquito species, including Aedes africanus in Africa, and Haemogogus spp. and Sabethes spp. in South AmericaFootnote 19Footnote 20. The intermediate cycle occurs only in Africa and involves transmission between humans and NHPs, and tree-hole breeding anthropophilic Aedes spp., including A. africanus, A. furcifer-taylori, A. bromeliae, A. metallicus, and A. luteocephalisFootnote 19Footnote 43.

Section IV – Stability and viability

Drug susceptibility/resistance

YFV is susceptible to high, and potentially cytotoxic, concentrations of ribavirin in vitroFootnote 44. Sofosbuvir has also shown antiviral activity against YFVFootnote 45. Some 2-indolinone compounds exhibited nontoxic and selective antiviral activity against YFV in vitro, with 1-benxyl and 5-halogen or nitro-substituted compounds being most effective against YFVFootnote 46.

Susceptibility to disinfectants

YFV is inactivated by 2% glutaraldehyde, beta-propioacetone, 2-3% hydrogen peroxide, 70% ethanol, 500-5000 ppm chlorine, 3-8% formaldehyde, 1% iodine and phenol iodophors, and 0.5% phenol with detergentFootnote 47.

Physical inactivation

YFV may be inactivated by heat treatment at temperatures >50°C for 30 minutes and by gamma irradiationFootnote 47.

Survival outside host

Low temperatures preserve infectivity, with stability being greatest below -60°CFootnote 48. YFV is viable for up to 90 days when air-dried on filter paper and maintained at room temperatureFootnote 49. In a case of YF vaccine virus transmission via blood transfusion, an individual received a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion from a donor that had been recently vaccinated with attenuated vaccineFootnote 37. The transfusion occurred 24 days after blood donation, suggesting that YF vaccine virus may be viable in stored RBC products for at least 24 days.

Section V – First aid/medical

Surveillance

The most widespread diagnostic method is detection of anti-YFV IgM antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), although this may be complicated by cross-reactivity among other flavivirusesFootnote 47. The plaque reduction neutralization (PRNT) assay, or virus neutralization test (VNT), is the most specific method for the detection of anti-YFV antibodies. Other tests that are currently used for detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against YFV include in house indirect immunofluorescence methods (IIF), which require well-trained personnel for correct interpretation, and ELISA, MAC-ELISA, and ELISA inhibition tests. More recently, a multiplex microsphere immunoassay (MIA) test has been described for the detection of arboviral antibodies, including those against YFVFootnote 47.

Note: The specific recommendations for surveillance in the laboratory should come from the medical surveillance program, which is based on a local risk assessment of the pathogens and activities being undertaken, as well as an overarching risk assessment of the biosafety program as a whole. More information on medical surveillance is available in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.

First aid/treatment

Treatment for YF is supportive as there are no therapies currently availableFootnote 50. Observation, rest, fluids and acetaminophen for pain and fever are recommended. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and aspirin should be avoided, given the risk of hemorrhagic shock. Persons with YF should be protected from mosquito bites for 5 days after fever onset to avoid infecting naïve mosquitoes and contributing to the transmission cycle.

Note: The specific recommendations for first aid/treatment in the laboratory should come from the post-exposure response plan, which is developed as part of the medical surveillance program. More information on the post-exposure response plan can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.

Immunization

A live attenuated YF vaccine (YF-VAX® or YF 17D vaccine) is available in CanadaFootnote 51. One dose of YF vaccine is recommended for immunocompetent individuals who are 9 months of age and older and travelling to countries with risk of YF transmission. Infants less than 6 months of age are at greater risk for YF vaccine-associated neurotropic disease following YF vaccination and should not receive the YF vaccine. In general, infants under the age of 9 months should not be vaccinated against YF. However, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in the United States recommends that for infants 6 to 8 months of age travelling to an endemic or transitional area, when travel is unavoidable, the decision to vaccinate needs to balance the risks of YF virus exposure with the risk of adverse events (AE) following immunizationFootnote 51. Laboratory personnel who work with YFV and those working in endemic YFV areas should receive the YFV vaccineFootnote 51.

YF-VAX® is contraindicated for those who have hypersensitivity reactions to the vaccine components, including eggs, as well as for children under 9 months of age, lactating individuals with babies under 9 months of age, and for those 60 years and older, as these groups are at a much higher risk of developing vaccine-associated neurotropic disease and viscerotropic diseaseFootnote 51, although these serious adverse effects are very rareFootnote 52.

Note: More information on the medical surveillance program can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook, and by consulting the Canadian Immunization Guide.

Prophylaxis

There is no approved post-exposure prophylaxis, although there is limited evidence to suggest that administration of passive immunotherapy, interferons, or interferon inducers may be effective if given before or within hours after YFV infection in an individual with known exposure (e.g., laboratory worker)Footnote 53.

Note: More information on prophylaxis as part of the medical surveillance program can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.

Section VI – Laboratory hazard

Laboratory-acquired infections

Over 30 cases of laboratory-acquired YFV infection were reported during the pre-vaccine era and were associated with contact with blood or tissues of infected patients or laboratory animals, or handling of experimentally infected animalsFootnote 34. One case occurred in a hospital technician in 1930 who analyzed a blood sample from a YF patient in London, United Kingdom; the individual died, although the route of transmission was unclearFootnote 54. One case of laboratory transmission was associated with a bite from an infected mosquitoFootnote 48.

Note: Please consult the Canadian Biosafety Standard and Canadian Biosafety Handbook for additional details on requirements for reporting exposure incidents.

Sources/specimens

YFV can be detected in blood, serum, organ tissues (liver, spleen, kidneys, heart, lung, and brain)Footnote 40, urine, and semenFootnote 55.

Primary hazards

Autoinoculation with infectious material, bites from infected mosquitoes, and exposure of mucous membranes or damaged skin are primary hazards associated with exposure to YFV.

Special hazards

Direct or indirect exposure to aerosols of concentrated YF 17D vaccine and work with experimentally infected animals can present a special hazardFootnote 34Footnote 56.

Section VII – Exposure controls/personal protection

Risk group classification

YFV is a Risk Group 3 Human Pathogen and Risk Group 3 Animal Pathogen, and is a Security Sensitive Biological Agent (SSBA)Footnote 57Footnote 58.

Containment requirements

Containment Level 3 facilities, equipment, and operational practices outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard for work involving infectious or potentially infectious materials, animals, or cultures.

Note that there are additional security requirements, such as obtaining a Human Pathogens and Toxins Act Security Clearance, for work involving SSBAs.

Protective clothing

The applicable Containment Level 3 requirements for personal protective equipment and clothing outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard are to be followed. At minimum, use of full body coverage dedicated protective clothing, dedicated protective footwear and/or additional protective footwear, gloves when handling infectious materials or animals, face protection when there is a known or potential risk of exposure to splashes or flying objects, respirators when there is a risk of exposure to infectious aerosols, and an additional layer of protective clothing prior to work with infectious materials or animals.

Note: A local risk assessment will identify the appropriate hand, foot, head, body, eye/face, and respiratory protection, and the personal protective equipment requirements for the containment zone must be documented.

Other precautions

All activities involving open vessels of pathogens are to be performed in a certified biological safety cabinet (BSC) or other appropriate primary containment device. The use of needles, syringes, and other sharp objects are to be strictly limited. Additional precautions must be considered with work involving animals or large scale activities.

Proper precautions should be considered when working with infected arthropods. This may include implementing a program to prevent escapes and monitor any escaped arthropods, as well as using suitable personal protective equipment (PPE), among other measuresFootnote 59Footnote 60.

Section VIII – Handling and storage

Spills

Allow aerosols to settle. Wearing personal protective equipment, gently cover the spill with absorbent paper towel and apply suitable disinfectant, starting at the perimeter and working towards the centre. Allow sufficient contact time with the disinfectant before clean-up (Canadian Biosafety Handbook).

Disposal

Regulated materials, as well as all items and waste to be decontaminated at the containment barrier prior to removal from the containment zone, animal room, animal cubicle, or post mortem room. This can be achieved by using decontamination technologies and processes that have been demonstrated to be effective against the infectious material, such as chemical disinfectants, autoclaving, irradiation, incineration, an effluent treatment system, or gaseous decontamination (Canadian Biosafety Handbook).

Storage

The applicable Containment Level 3 requirements for storage outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard are to be followed. Primary containers of regulated materials removed from the containment zone to be stored in a labelled, leak-proof, impact-resistant secondary container, and kept either in locked storage equipment or within an area with limited access.

Containers of security sensitive biological agents (SSBAs) stored outside the containment zone must be labelled, leakproof, impact resistant, and kept in locked storage equipment that is fixed in place (i.e., non-movable) and within an area with limited access.

An inventory of RG3 and RG4 pathogens, and SSBA toxins in long-term storage, to be maintained and to include:

Section IX – Regulatory and other information

Canadian regulatory information

Controlled activities with YFV require a Pathogen and Toxin licence issued by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). YFV is a terrestrial animal pathogen in Canada; therefore, importation of YFV requires an import permit under the authority of the Health of Animals Regulations (HAR). The PHAC issues a Pathogen and Toxin Licence, which includes a Human Pathogen and Toxin Licence and an HAR importation permit.

Note that there are additional security requirements, such as obtaining a Human Pathogens and Toxins Act Security Clearance, for work involving SSBAs.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of applicable designations, regulations, or legislations:

Last file update

June 2024

Prepared by

Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada.

Disclaimer

The scientific information, opinions, and recommendations contained in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet have been developed based on or compiled from trusted sources available at the time of publication. Newly discovered hazards are frequent and this information may not be completely up to date. The Government of Canada accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, sufficiency, or reliability or for any loss or injury resulting from the use of the information.

Persons in Canada are responsible for complying with the relevant laws, including regulations, directives and standards applicable to the import, transport, and use of pathogens and toxines in Canada set by relevant regulatory authorities, including the Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment and Climate Change Canada, and Transport Canada. The risk classification and related regulatory requirements referenced in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet, such as those found in the Canadian Biosafety Standard, may be incomplete and are specific to the Canadian context. Other jurisdictions will have their own requirements.

Copyright © Public Health Agency of Canada, 2024, Canada

References

Footnote 1

International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2023. Taxon details| ICTV. Available at https://ictv.global/taxonomy/taxondetails?taxnode_id=202303121&taxon_name=Orthoflavivirus%20flavi [Accessed on June 18, 2024]

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Acha, PN, and Szyfres, B. 2003. Yellow Fever. Zoonoses and Communicable Diseases Common to Man and Animals (3rd ed., pp. 377-387). Washington D.C.: Pan American Health Organization.

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Oldstone MBA. 2020. Viruses, Plagues, and History: Past, Present, and Future. Oxford University Press.

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Footnote 4

Bazin, H. 2011. Yellow fever vaccine, p. 407-454. Vaccination: A History: From Lady Montagu to Genetic Engineering. John Libbey Eurotext.

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Footnote 5

Gardner CL, and Ryman KD. 2010. Yellow fever: a reemerging threat. Clin Lab Med 30:237-60.

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Footnote 6

Rice CM, Lenches EM, Eddy SR, Shin SJ, Sheets RL, and Strauss JH. 1985. Nucleotide sequence of yellow fever virus: implications for flavivirus gene expression and evolution. Science 229:726-33.

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Footnote 7

Hay A. 1999. A magic sword or a big itch: an historical look at the United States biological weapons programme. Med Confl Surviv 15:215-34.

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Footnote 8

Manso PP, Dias de Oliveira BC, de Sequeira PC, Maia de Souza YR, Ferro JM, da Silva IJ, Caputo LF, Guedes PT, dos Santos AA, Freire Mda S, Bonaldo MC, and Pelajo-Machado M. 2015. Yellow Fever 17DD Vaccine Virus Infection Causes Detectable Changes in Chicken Embryos. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9:e0004064.

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Footnote 9

Monath TP. 2001. Yellow fever: an update. Lancet Infect Dis 1:11-20.

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

Chen LH, and Wilson ME. 2016. Update on non-vector transmission of dengue: relevant studies with Zika and other flaviviruses. Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines 2:15.

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

Waggoner JJ, Rojas A, and Pinsky BA. 2018. Yellow Fever Virus: Diagnostics for a Persistent Arboviral Threat. J Clin Microbiol 56.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

Hansen CA, and Barrett ADT. 2021. The Present and Future of Yellow Fever Vaccines. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 14.

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

Jardim LL, Franco MB, de Oliveira NR, de Carvalho BN, Basques F, Ribeiro DD, Lisman T, Pereira LS, and Rezende SM. 2024. Hypocoagulability in severe yellow fever infection is associated with bleeding: results from a cohort study. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 8:102427.

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Footnote 14

World Health Organization. 2003. WHO Position Paper - Yellow Fever Vaccine. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec., 40: 349–359.

Return to footnote 14 referrer

Footnote 15

LacKamp AN, and Stevens RD. 2013. Neurologic Implications of Critical Illness and Organ Dysfunction. Textbook of Neurointensive Care.

Return to footnote 15 referrer

Footnote 16

Gaythorpe KA, Hamlet A, Jean K, Garkauskas Ramos D, Cibrelus L, Garske T, and Ferguson N. 2021. The global burden of yellow fever. Elife 10.

Return to footnote 16 referrer

Footnote 17

Servadio JL, Munoz-Zanzi C, and Convertino M. 2021. Estimating case fatality risk of severe Yellow Fever cases: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 21:819.

Return to footnote 17 referrer

Footnote 18

Gianchecchi E, Cianchi V, Torelli A, and Montomoli E. 2022. Yellow Fever: Origin, Epidemiology, Preventive Strategies and Future Prospects. Vaccines (Basel) 10.

Return to footnote 18 referrer

Footnote 19

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2024. Yellow Fever | CDC Yellow Book 2024.

Return to footnote 19 referrer

Footnote 20

Haddow AJ. 1969. X.—The Natural History of Yellow Fever in Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section B Biology 70:191-227.

Return to footnote 20 referrer

Footnote 21

Mulchandani R, Massebo F, Bocho F, Jeffries CL, Walker T, and Messenger LA. 2019. A community-level investigation following a yellow fever virus outbreak in South Omo Zone, South-West Ethiopia. PeerJ 7:e6466.

Return to footnote 21 referrer

Footnote 22

World Health Organization. 2014. Fact sheet : Yellow fever. Available at https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/204192/Fact_Sheet_WHD_2014_EN_1635.pdf?sequence=1

Return to footnote 22 referrer

Footnote 23

Douam F, and Ploss A. 2018. Yellow Fever Virus: Knowledge Gaps Impeding the Fight Against an Old Foe. Trends Microbiol 26:913-928.

Return to footnote 23 referrer

Footnote 24

Ardoin P, Rodhain F, and Hannoun C. 1976. Epidemiologic study of arboviruses in the Arba-Minch district of Ethiopia. Tropical and Geographical Medicine. 1976;28(4):309–315.

Return to footnote 24 referrer

Footnote 25

Gubler DJ. 2004. The changing epidemiology of yellow fever and dengue, 1900 to 2003: full circle? Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 27:319-30.

Return to footnote 25 referrer

Footnote 26

Tuboi SH, Costa ZG, da Costa Vasconcelos PF, and Hatch D. 2007. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of yellow fever in Brazil: analysis of reported cases 1998-2002. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 101:169-75.

Return to footnote 26 referrer

Footnote 27

Kleinert RDV, Montoya-Diaz E, Khera T, Welsch K, Tegtmeyer B, Hoehl S, Ciesek S, and Brown RJP. 2019. Yellow Fever: Integrating Current Knowledge with Technological Innovations to Identify Strategies for Controlling a Re-Emerging Virus. Viruses 11.

Return to footnote 27 referrer

Footnote 28

de Azevedo Fernandes NCC, Guerra JM, Diaz-Delgado J, Cunha MS, Saad LD, Iglezias SD, Ressio RA, Dos Santos Cirqueira C, Kanamura CT, Jesus IP, Maeda AY, Vasami FGS, de Carvalho J, de Araujo LJT, de Souza RP, Nogueira JS, Spinola RMF, and Catao-Dias JL. 2021. Differential Yellow Fever Susceptibility in New World Nonhuman Primates, Comparison with Humans, and Implications for Surveillance. Emerg Infect Dis 27:47-56.

Return to footnote 28 referrer

Footnote 29

Mares-Guia MAMDM, Horta MA, Romano A, Rodrigues CDS, Mendonça MCL, Dos Santos CC, Torres MC, Araujo ESM, Fabri A, De Souza ER, Ribeiro ROR, Lucena FP, Junior LCA, Da Cunha RV, Nogueira RMR, Sequeira PC, and De Filippis AMB. 2020. Yellow fever epizootics in non-human primates, Southeast and Northeast Brazil (2017 and 2018). Parasites and Vectors 13.

Return to footnote 29 referrer

Footnote 30

Meegan, JM. 1994. Yellow Fever. Handbook of Zoonoses, Section B.

Return to footnote 30 referrer

Footnote 31

Julander JG. 2013. Experimental therapies for yellow fever. Antiviral Res 97:169-79.

Return to footnote 31 referrer

Footnote 32

Franz DR, Jahrling PB, Friedlander AM, McClain DJ, Hoover DL, Bryne WR, Pavlin JA, Christopher GW, and Eitzen EM, Jr. 1997. Clinical recognition and management of patients exposed to biological warfare agents. JAMA 278:399-411.

Return to footnote 32 referrer

Footnote 33

Stokes A, Bauer JH, and Hudson NP. 1928. The transmission of yellow fever to Macacus rhesus. Rev Med Virol 11:141-8.

Return to footnote 33 referrer

Footnote 34

Chen L, and Wilson M. 2005. Non-vector transmission of dengue and other mosquito-borne flaviviruses. Dengue Bulletin 29.

Return to footnote 34 referrer

Footnote 35

Hearn HJ, Jr., Soper WT, and Miller WS. 1965. Loss in Virulence of Yellow Fever Virus Serially Passed in Hela Cells. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 119:319-22.

Return to footnote 35 referrer

Footnote 36

Miller WS, Demchak P, Rosenberger CR, Dominik JW, and Bradshaw IL. 1963. Stability and infectivity of airborne yellow fever and rift valley fever viruses1. American Journal of Epidemiology 77:114-121.

Return to footnote 36 referrer

Footnote 37

Gould CV, Free RJ, Bhatnagar J, Soto RA, Royer TL, Maley WR, Moss S, Berk MA, Craig-Shapiro R, Kodiyanplakkal RPL, Westblade LF, Muthukumar T, Puius YA, Raina A, Hadi A, Gyure KA, Trief D, Pereira M, Kuehnert MJ, Ballen V, Kessler DA, Dailey K, Omura C, Doan T, Miller S, Wilson MR, Lehman JA, Ritter JM, Lee E, Silva-Flannery L, Reagan-Steiner S, Velez JO, Laven JJ, Fitzpatrick KA, Panella A, Davis EH, Hughes HR, Brault AC, St George K, Dean AB, Ackelsberg J, Basavaraju SV, Chiu CY, and Staples JE. 2023. Transmission of yellow fever vaccine virus through blood transfusion and organ transplantation in the USA in 2021: report of an investigation. Lancet Microbe 4:e711-e721.

Return to footnote 37 referrer

Footnote 38

Bentlin MR, de Barros Almeida RA, Coelho KI, Ribeiro AF, Siciliano MM, Suzuki A, and Fortaleza CM. 2011. Perinatal transmission of yellow fever, Brazil, 2009. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1779-80.

Return to footnote 38 referrer

Footnote 39

Diniz LMO, Romanelli RMC, de Carvalho AL, Teixeira DC, de Carvalho LFA, Ferreira Cury V, Filho MPL, Perigolo G, and Heringer TP. 2019. Perinatal Yellow Fever: A Case Report. Pediatr Infect Dis J 38:300-301.

Return to footnote 39 referrer

Footnote 40

Rifkind, D. and Freeman, G.L. 2005. 12 - YELLOW FEVER. The Nobel Prize Winning Discoveries in Infectious Diseases (D. Rifkind and G. L. Freeman, eds), pp. 85–88.

Return to footnote 40 referrer

Footnote 41

de Thoisy B, Dussart P, and Kazanji M. 2004. Wild terrestrial rainforest mammals as potential reservoirs for flaviviruses (yellow fever, dengue 2 and St Louis encephalitis viruses) in French Guiana. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 98:409-12.

Return to footnote 41 referrer

Footnote 42

Shinde D, Plante J, Plante K, and Weaver S. 2022. Yellow Fever: Roles of Animal Models and Arthropod Vector Studies in Understanding Epidemic Emergence. Microorganisms 10:1578.

Return to footnote 42 referrer

Footnote 43

Monath TP, and Vasconcelos PF. 2015. Yellow fever. J Clin Virol 64:160-73.

Return to footnote 43 referrer

Footnote 44

Blacksell SD, and Wormser GP. 2007. Tropical Infectious Diseases: Principles, Pathogens, and Practice 2nd Edition, Volumes 1 and 2 Edited by Richard L. Guerrant, David H. Walker, and Peter F. Weller Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone (Elsevier), 2005 1936 pp. $329.00 (cloth). Clinical Infectious Diseases 44:314-315.

Return to footnote 44 referrer

Footnote 45

Mendes E, Pilger D, Nastri A, Malta F, Pascoalino B, D'Albuquerque L, Balan A, Jr L, Durigon E, Carrilho F, and Pinho J. 2019. Sofosbuvir inhibits yellow fever virus in vitro and in patients with acute liver failure. Annals of Hepatology 18.

Return to footnote 45 referrer

Footnote 46

Apaydın ÇB, Göktaş F, Naesens L, and Karalı N. 2024. Novel 2-Indolinone Derivatives as Promising Agents against Respiratory Syncytial and Yellow Fever Viruses. Future Medicinal Chemistry 16:295-310.

Return to footnote 46 referrer

Footnote 47

Domingo C, Charrel RN, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Zeller H, and Reusken C. 2018. Yellow fever in the diagnostics laboratory. Emerg Microbes Infect 7:129.

Return to footnote 47 referrer

Footnote 48

Burke, DS., and Monath, TP. 2001. Flaviviruses. D. M. Knipe, & P. A. Howley (Eds.), (4th ed., pp. 1043-1125). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Return to footnote 48 referrer

Footnote 49

Guzman H, Ding X, Xiao SY, and Tesh RB. 2005. Duration of infectivity and RNA of Venezuelan equine encephalitis, West Nile, and yellow fever viruses dried on filter paper and maintained at room temperature. Am J Trop Med Hyg 72:474-7.

Return to footnote 49 referrer

Footnote 50

McGuinness I, Beckham JD, Tyler KL, and Pastula DM. 2017. An Overview of Yellow Fever Virus Disease. Neurohospitalist 7:157-158.

Return to footnote 50 referrer

Footnote 51

Public Health Agency of Canada. 2023. Yellow fever vaccine: Canadian Immunization Guide. Available at Yellow fever vaccine: Canadian Immunization Guide - Canada.ca

Return to footnote 51 referrer

Footnote 52

Hansen CA, and Barrett ADT. 2021. The Present and Future of Yellow Fever Vaccines. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 14.

Return to footnote 52 referrer

Footnote 53

Monath TP. 2008. Treatment of yellow fever. Antiviral Res 78:116-24.

Return to footnote 53 referrer

Footnote 54

Cook GC. 1994. Fatal yellow fever contracted at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London, UK, in 1930. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 88:712-3.

Return to footnote 54 referrer

Footnote 55

Barbosa C, Di Paola N, Cunha M, Rodrigues-Jesus M, Araujo D, Silveira V, Leal F, Mesquita F, Botosso V, Zanotto PMA, Durigon E, Silva M, and Oliveira DBL. 2018. Yellow Fever Virus DNA in Urine and Semen of Convalescent Patient, Brazil. Emerging Infectious Disease journal 24:176.

Return to footnote 55 referrer

Footnote 56

Cetron MS, Marfin AA, Julian KG, Gubler DJ, Sharp DJ, Barwick RS, Weld LH, Chen R, Clover RD, Deseda-Tous J, Marchessault V, Offit PA, and Monath TP. 2002. Yellow fever vaccine. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2002. MMWR Recomm Rep 51:1-11; quiz CE1-4.

Return to footnote 56 referrer

Footnote 57

Public Health Agency of Canada. 2023. Human Pathogens and Toxins Act (HPTA) (S.C. 2009, c.24).

Return to footnote 57 referrer

Footnote 58

ePATHogen Risk Group Database. 2024. Available at https://health.canada.ca/en/epathogen [Accessed on June 19, 2024]

Return to footnote 58 referrer

Footnote 59

Containment Standards for Facilities Handling Plant Pests, Canadian Food Inspection Agency (Canada)

Return to footnote 59 referrer

Footnote 60

Arthropod Containment Guidelines from the American Committee of Medical Entomology; American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (USA)

Return to footnote 60 referrer

Page details

2026-02-19