ARCHIVED - Chronic Diseases in Canada

 

Volume 30, no. 2, March 2010

The comorbidity burden of the treated asthma patient population in British Columbia

R. Prosser, PhD (1); B. Carleton, PharmD (1); A. Smith, MSc (1)

Author References

  1. University of British Columbia, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Correspondence:Robert Prosser, 4th floor, Child and Family Research Institute, 950 West 28th Ave, Vancouver BC V5Z 4H4; Tel.: 604-875-2000 ext. 5360; Fax: 604-875-2494; E-mail: bprosser@popi.ubc.ca

Abstract

To date there has been little investigation of the prevalence of comorbid conditions in asthma patients. Using 1996/97 cross-sectional health services administrative data for British Columbia, we compared the prevalence of comorbid conditions in treated adult asthma patients with the general adult population using a standardized comorbidity identification methodology, the Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG) Case-Mix System. We also profiled the comorbidity burden of pediatric asthma patients.

Adults with asthma were significantly more likely to have a range of comorbidities, including respiratory infections, allergic rhinitis and 8 high impact/high prevalence chronic conditions (HIHPCCs). One in 4 adults with asthma had depression, the most prevalent HIHPCC. Children with asthma had a lower comorbidity burden than adults, but 12.6% had a stable or unstable chronic medical condition, with the most prevalent HIHPCC also depression.

Adults with asthma had a high and complex comorbidity burden, particularly in terms of multiple chronic conditions. We discuss the implications for services planning and delivery.

Keywords: asthma, comorbidity, multimorbidity, burden of illness, population health, chronic conditions, British Columbia, Canada

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the respiratory system, and is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases, affecting an estimated 300 million people worldwide and creating a burden in the order of 15 million disability-adjusted life years lost annually–approximately the level for diabetes or schizophrenia. Prevalence appears to be increasing.1

In recent years there has been a growing recognition of the importance of addressing comorbidity in patients with chronic conditions. There are several reasons for this: co-occurrence of multiple chronic conditions is common;2a,3acomorbidity has a negative impact on patients' quality of life;2b,3b and chronic disease management patients with higher levels of comorbidity use more health care services than patients with lower levels.4

To date there have been few published studies of comorbidity in asthma patients, and the research has had limitations with respect to (a) the range of comorbid chronic conditions studied, (b) lack of consistency and of reported details of the definitions used for the comorbid conditions studied and (c) representativeness and/or size of the samples studied. The lack of uniformity and representativeness are important in relation to obtaining unbiased and precise estimates of the prevalences of conditions–especially less common conditions–and of co-occurrences of particular pairs of conditions.

Van Manen et al.5a used a questionnaire to obtain data about 23 comorbid conditions from 290 general practice patients over the age of 40 with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 421 control patients. Locomotive diseases, insomnia, stomach and duodenal ulcers, migraine, sinusitis, depression, cancer and atherosclerosis were significantly more prevalent in the former group.

Using data collected in an Australian general population health survey from 834 adults with asthma and 6609 without, Adams et al.6a found that, after age and sex adjustments, arthritis, heart disease, stroke, cancer and osteoporosis were more prevalent among the asthmatic respondents.

Soriano et al.7 estimated the prevalences of comorbid conditions–reported in terms of the major organ systems affected, e.g. gastrointestinal–and other types of disorders, e.g. infections, in an administrative data–based study in Britain involving 7933 patients with asthma and an equal number of matched controls without.

It is difficult to compare the results of these studies. Further, with the exception of a study5b by Diette et al.8concerning a few selected conditions in older asthma patients and the van Manen et al. study,5 there appears to have been little systematic analysis that describes prevalences of asthma patients’ comorbidities in relation to age, sex and asthma severity.

In order to better design interventions and allocate health care resources, it is important for planners of chronic disease management programs to fully understand the needs of their target populations. Zhao et al.9a recently proposed a methodology called disease burden profiling as a means of identifying and describing populations with chronic conditions. In this approach, prevalences for a wide range of comorbid condition categories are computed in a population with a particular index condition, and excess morbidity ratios are computed for these categories to compare prevalences for patients without the index condition. One key to the successful implementation of this approach is the categorization of the comorbidities in a standardized manner using case-mix software.

Starfield et al.10 used the Johns Hopkins University Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG) Case-Mix System11a as a standardized method to categorize comorbidity in a study of resource utilization by managed care organization patients with chronic conditions. For the index conditions studied—hypertension, asthma, diabetes and 8 others—patterns of use of physician and emergency room were highly related to the degree of comorbidity.

Broemeling et al.12a also used this tool to categorize comorbidity in a population-based study of chronic conditions in British Columbia (BC). In 2000/01, 36% of the adult population had at least 1 chronic condition, and 30% of this group had 6 or more comorbid conditions. In comparison, 33% of the adult population had acute conditions only, and just 2.5% of this group had 6 or more comorbid conditions. Again, resource utilization was strongly linked to both the index conditions studied and patients’ level of comorbidity.

The objective of this study is to compare the prevalences of common chronic and acute conditions in adults with asthma to prevalences in the province’s general adult population using a standardized set of comorbidity identification algorithms—the ACG Case-Mix System.

Methods

Study design and data sources

We conducted a cross-sectional comparison of comorbidity prevalence in two populations: the population of treated adult (18 years and older) asthma patients in BC and the province's adult general medical services user population. The prevalence estimates used for the latter were obtained from a report by Reid et al.13a on high-cost users of physician services in BC during the 1996/97 fiscal year that includes adult asthma patients.13b In addition, we examined the prevalence of comorbidities in children with asthma aged 5 to 17 years and compared comorbidity profiles of subgroups within the adult and child populations.

The primary data sources used in this study were 3 linked BC Ministry of Health databases: the Medical Services Plan database containing fee-for-service general practitioner and specialist physician billing records, the Discharge Abstracts Database of hospital separation records and the PharmaNet database that captures all prescription drug dispensing in community pharmacies throughout BC.

The treated asthma population of BC

The treated asthma population in 1996/97, the year used by Reid et al.,13c comprised 112 000 patients with continuous health care system enrolment aged 5 years or older between April 1, 1996, and March 31, 1997, who satisfied one or more of the following criteria during the year: (a) at least 3 dispensing events for asthma medications (the list of qualifying medications is available from the corresponding author); (b) at least one hospital discharge with International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9) code 493 as the principal diagnosis or (c) at least two 493-coded physician visits. In a previous validation study,14 we estimated the sensitivity and specificity of our case definition to be 0.632 and 0.997, respectively, relative to a case selection algorithm developed using latent class modeling.

Data elements

Like Reid et al.,13d we used the Johns Hopkins University ACG Case-Mix System (version 5) as a standardized, validated set of algorithms for creating a set of binary variables indicating the presence or absence of specific types of comorbidity. This system is extensively described in the reference manual for the software that is used to generate these variables from patients' physician visits and hospitalization records.11b Recent validation studies in several jurisdictions–Sweden,15 Spain16,17 and two Canadian provinces18–have shown the system to be effective in characterizing the morbidity burden of populations.

Briefly, the system's set of 32 mutually exclusive Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADGs) form a high level classification scheme for groups of diseases/conditions. Each of the ICD diagnostic codes is assigned to a single ADG on the basis of 5 clinical dimensions of the condition: duration, severity, etiology, diagnostic certainty and the need for specialty care involvement. The conditions within an ADG are similar with respect to the expected level of resource utilization by patients. Having 1 or more of 8 major ADGs such as Chronic Medical: Unstable (ADG11) or Malignancy (ADG32), for example, is predictive, ceteris paribus, of greater resource use than having minor ADGs like Time-limited – Minor (ADG1) or Likely to Recur – Discrete (ADG7).

The system's 264 Expanded Diagnosis Cluster (EDC) variables represent sets of ICD diagnostic codes grouped on the basis of clinical similarity of the associated conditions. In contrast to ADGs, this grouping does not take into account possible differences in disease severity, chronicity or expected resource requirements. The EDCs, for example, Allergic Rhinitis (ALL03) or Ischemic Heart Disease (CAR03), are more useful than ADGs in identifying patients with particular comorbid conditions.

Table 1 provides the full names and abbreviations for the ADGs and EDCs we focused on in this study–40 of the 46 EDCs used by Reid et al.13e The major ADGs are flagged. Note that several ADGs are omitted including ADG6 (Asthma), ADG31 (Preventive and Administrative), ADG33 (Pregnancy) and ADG34 (Dental). ADGs 15 and 19 are no longer used.

Table 1
Aggregated Diagnosis Group (ADG) and Expanded Diagnosis Cluster (EDC) names and identifiers
Aggregated Diagnosis Group (ADG) Expanded Diagnosis Cluster (EDC)
1 Time limited: minor ALL01 Allergic reactions
2 Time limited: minor – primary infections ALL03 Allergic rhinitis
3 Time limited: major CAR02a Hypertension
4 Time limited: major – primary infections CAR03a Ischemic heart disease
5 Allergies CAR05a Congestive heart failure
7 Likely to recur: discrete CAR09a Cardiac arrhythmia
8 Likely to recur: discrete – infections CAR10 Generalized atherosclerosis
9 Likely to recur: progressive EAR01 Otitis media
10 Chronic medical: stable EAR09 Chronic pharyngitis and tonsillitis
11 Chronic medical: unstable EAR11a Acute upper respiratory tract infection
12 Chronic specialty: stable – orthopedic END01a Diabetes mellitus
13 Chronic specialty: stable – ear, nose, throat END02 Osteoporosis
14 Chronic specialty: stable – eye END04 Thyroid disease
16 Chronic specialty: unstable – orthopedic GAS02 Inflammatory bowel disease
17 Chronic specialty: unstable – ear, nose, throat GAS05 Chronic liver disease
18 Chronic specialty: unstable – eye GAS06a Peptic ulcer disease
20 Dermatologic GAS08 Gastroesophageal reflux
21 Injuries/adverse effects: minor GAS09 Irritable bowel syndrome
22 Injuries/adverse effects: major GSU11 Peripheral vascular disease
23 Psychosocial: time limited, minor GUR08a Urinary tract infection
24 Psychosocial: recurrent or persistent, stable HEM02a Iron deficiency, other deficiency anemias
25 Psychosocial: recurrent or persistent, unstable INF01 Tuberculosis infection
26 Signs/symptoms: minor MAL01 Malignant neoplasms of the skin
27 Signs/symptoms: uncertain MAL02ab Low impact malignant neoplasms
28 Signs/symptoms: major MAL03ab High impact malignant neoplasms
29 Discretionary MUS03a Degenerative joint disease
30 See and reassure MUS14a Low back pain
32 Malignancy NUR01 Neurologic signs and symptoms
    NUR05a Cerebrovascular disease
    NUR06 Parkinson’s disease
    NUR08 Multiple sclerosis
    PSY01a Depression, anxiety, neuroses
    PSY07a Schizophrenia and affective psychoses
    REN01 Chronic renal failure
    RES02a Acute lower respiratory tract infection
    RES03 Cystic fibrosis
    RES04a Emphysema, chronic bronchitis, COPD
    RES07 Sinusitis
    RHU01a Autoimmune and connective tissue diseases
    SKN02a Dermatitis and eczema

Shading indicates major ADGs and High Impact/High Prevalence (HI/HP) EDCs.

a EDCs for which comparisons are made with the general adult population. Asthma, our index condition, is also HI/HP.

b MAL02 and MAL03 are combined as Cancer when considering the HI/HP conditions.

Statistical analyses

For each of 28 ADGs we computed the proportion of adult asthma patients who had the ADG and compared these odds with the corresponding odds for the general adult population. We repeated our profile comparison using the 21 EDCs and 19 additional EDCs (see Table 1). We obtained approximate 95% bootstrap confidence intervals19 for each odds ratio (OR) using 1000 samples from the adult asthma patient population (n = 93 512). In computing the ORs we treated the odds values for the general population (computed from the Reid et al. proportions13f) as exact estimates because of this population's large size (N = 2 521 248). Because comorbid conditions are interrelated and multiple comparisons of their prevalences are not independent, we used an adaptation of Westfall's multiple comparison method20 to control type 1 error rate in testing composite hypotheses about intergroup ADG (EDC) profile differences. Using the age distribution reported by Reid et al.13g for the adult service user (ASU) population and the age distribution for the adult asthma patient cohort, we created a set of weights that could be applied to the latter's data to perform a crude age adjustment in our OR comparisons of the asthma patient and ASU groups. We have reported weighted and unweighted comparisons.

We also created ADG and EDC prevalence profiles for male and female adults and children and compared the corresponding prevalences via ORs using bootstrapping to create confidence intervals, repeatedly sampling from each subgroup. We used SPSS version 15 for all our analyses.21

Results

Table 2 shows age and sex distributions for the adult asthma patient population and the general ASU population of BC. The latter comprises 84% of the province's total adult population. The percentages of asthma patients in the 60-to-74-year and 75-year -plus age groups are larger than the corresponding percentages for the ASU population. The proportion of men is similar for the adult asthma patient and ASU populations.

Table 3, which shows the prevalence of each ADG in the adult asthma patient and ASU populations, provides a summary of the 2 populations' comorbidity burdens. Adult asthma patients were significantly more likely to have any particular (ADG) category of comorbidity.

Table 3 also provides a comparison of the populations via ORs for the 28 ADGs. All but 2 of the ADGs had an OR, computed with weighting, that was significantly larger than 1, signifying a greater morbidity burden in the asthma population. Further, individual adults with asthma tended to have more multimorbidity than individual ASUs–larger numbers of ADGs, and in particular more of the 8 major ADGs (3, 4, 9, 11, 16, 22, 25 and 32) associated with very high expected resource use.9b Of adult asthma patients, 36% had 6 or more ADGs, compared with 20% for ASUs; 18.9% of adult asthma patients had 2 or more major ADGs compared with 9.3% of ASUs.

While children with asthma generally had a lower comorbidity burden than adult asthma patients, 12.1% had 6 or more ADGs (14.8% for girls and 10.2% for boys); 12.6% had a stable or unstable chronic medical condition; and 4.3% had 2 or more major ADGs. The most prevalent ADG (65%) among these children was time-limited minor infections. Almost 1 in 6 children (15%) with asthma had allergies (ADG5), and 1 in 12 children–9.2% of girls and 6.9% of boys–had depression (PSY01). Note that ADG5 incorporates allergic rhinitis associated with a variety of factors, e.g. animal hair, but not conditions such as atopic dermatitis.

Table 2
Age and sex profiles of asthma patients and general adult service user (ASU) population
  Asthma patients General adult
All Adults service user population
(n = 111 780) (n = 93 512) (N = 2 521 248)
Age (years) % % %
5–11 10.3    
12–17 6.0    
18–29 9.8 11.7 20.0
30–44 17.4 20.8 32.0
45–59 17.4 20.8 23.4
60–74 23.2 27.7 15.8
75+ 15.9 19.0 8.8
Total 100 100 100
  Patients aged 5–17 Patients aged 18+ Adult service users
Sex % % %
M 57.7 43.5 45.6
F 42.3 56.5 54.4
Table 3
Prevalences and odds ratios for ADGs in adults with asthma and general adult service users
Aggregated Diagnosis Group (ADG)a Prevalence per 1000 population Unweightedb Weightedb
Adults with asthma General population users Odds ratio 95% CI Odds ratio 95% CI
27 Signs/symptoms: uncertain 486 400 1.42 (1.40, 1.44) 1.29 (1.27, 1.31)
28 Signs/symptoms: major 488 398 1.44 (1.42, 1.46) 1.36 (1.34, 1.38)
2 Time limited: minor primary infections 561 359 2.29 (2.26, 2.31) 2.32 (2.28, 2.35)
26 Signs/symptoms: minor 497 309 2.21 (2.18, 2.24) 2.05 (2.02, 2.08)
10 Chronic medical: stable 437 282 1.98 (1.96, 2.01) 1.46 (1.44, 1.48)
1 Time limited: minor 324 276 1.26 (1.24, 1.28) 1.30 (1.28, 1.32)
7 Likely to recur: discrete 261 186 1.55 (1.52, 1.57) 1.48 (1.46, 1.51)
24 Psychosocial: recurrent or persistent, stable 231 170 1.46 (1.44, 1.49) 1.58 (1.56, 1.61)
21 Injuries/adverse effects: minor 174 150 1.19 (1.17, 1.21) 1.30 (1.28, 1.33)
11 Chronic medical: unstable 376 141 3.68 (3.63, 3.73) 2.44 (2.41, 2.48)
20 Dermatologic 140 125 1.14 (1.12, 1.16) 1.15 (1.12, 1.17)
8 Likely to recur: discrete – infections 170 121 1.49 (1.47, 1.52) 1.60 (1.57, 1.63)
29 Discretionary 164 118 1.46 (1.44, 1.49) 1.39 (1.37, 1.42)
22 Injuries/adverse effects: major 166 113 1.56 (1.53, 1.59) 1.56 (1.53, 1.59)
14 Chronic specialty: stable – eye 82 73 1.14 (1.12, 1.17) 0.73 (0.71, 0.75)
4 Time limited: major – primary infections 109 59 1.93 (1.89, 1.97) 1.74 (1.70, 1.78)
18 Chronic specialty: unstable – eye 68 59 1.17 (1.14, 1.20) 0.82 (0.80, 0.85)
3 Time limited: major 96 53 1.92 (1.88, 1.96) 1.50 (1.46, 1.53)
23 Psychosocial: time limited, minor 71 49 1.49 (1.45, 1.53) 1.60 (1.56, 1.65)
5 Allergies 102 47 2.29 (2.24, 2.34) 2.71 (2.65, 2.77)
32 Malignancy 71 34 2.18 (2.13, 2.24) 1.45 (1.41, 1.49)
25 Psychosocial: recurrent or persistent, unstable 50 31 1.66 (1.61, 1.71) 1.68 (1.62, 1.73)
9 Likely to recur: progressive 51 23 2.28 (2.22, 2.35) 1.44 (1.40, 1.49)
12 Chronic specialty: stable – orthopedic 27 21 1.29 (1.24, 1.35) 1.28 (1.22, 1.33)
13 Chronic specialty: stable – ear, nose, throat 24 14 1.70 (1.63, 1.77) 1.43 (1.36, 1.50)
16 Chronic specialty: unstable – orthopedic 20 14 1.40 (1.34, 1.47) 1.36 (1.30, 1.44)
30 See and reassure 20 14 1.45 (1.39, 1.51) 1.25 (1.19, 1.32)
17 Chronic specialty: unstable – ear, nose, throat 13 8 1.61 (1.52, 1.71) 1.38 (1.30, 1.48)

Notes: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.

aThe ADGs are in order of decreasing prevalence in the general adult service user population.

bIn the unweighted computations, the asthma patients' age distribution is unmodified. In the weighted computations, cases were weighted to produce an age distribution that approximated that of the general adult service using population. Prevalences for adults with asthma are unweighted.

Table 4
Prevalences and odds ratios for EDCs in adults with asthma and general adult service user population
Expanded Diagnosis Cluster (EDC) per 1000 population Unweighted Weighted
  Asthma General Odds ratio 95% CI Odds ratio 95% CI
EAR11 Acute upper respiratory tract infection 262 205 1.38 (1.36, 1.40) 1.60 (1.57, 1.62)
PSY01 Depression, anxiety, neuroses 249 187 1.44 (1.42, 1.46) 1.56 (1.54, 1.59)
NUR01 Neurologic signs and symptoms 225 175 1.37 (1.35, 1.39) 1.34 (1.32, 1.37)
RES02 Acute lower respiratory tract infection 354 115 4.23 (4.17, 4.29) 3.87 (3.81, 3.93)
CAR02 Hypertension 179 112 1.73 (1.70, 1.75) 1.16 (1.14, 1.18)
MUS14 Low back pain 137 106 1.34 (1.32, 1.37) 1.39 (1.37, 1.42)
SKN02 Dermatitis and eczema 77 58 1.35 (1.32, 1.38) 1.45 (1.41, 1.49)
GUR08 Urinary tract infection 82 56 1.51 (1.48, 1.55) 1.43 (1.38, 1.46)
CAR03 Ischemic heart disease 93 49 2.00 (1.95, 2.04) 1.22 (1.19, 1.25)
END01 Diabetes mellitus 67 41 1.68 (1.63, 1.72) 1.23 (1.19, 1.26)
MUS03 Degenerative joint disease 80 40 2.12 (2.07, 2.17) 1.49 (1.45, 1.52)
GAS06 Peptic ulcer disease 64 37 1.79 (1.75, 1.84) 1.66 (1.61, 1.71)
CAR09 Cardiac arrhythmia 58 27 2.24 (2.18, 2.30) 1.38 (1.34, 1.42)
MAL02 Low impact malignant neoplasms 49 24 2.08 (2.01, 2.14) 1.43 (1.38, 1.48)
HEM02 Iron deficiency, other deficiency anemias 38 19 2.07 (2.00, 2.14) 1.56 (1.50, 1.62)
RHU01 Autoimmune and connective tissue diseases 66 19 3.75 (3.65, 3.85) 3.13 (3.04, 3.22)
RES04 Emphysema, chronic bronchitis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) 197 16 14.75 (14.5, 15.0) 9.13 (8.96, 9.30)
CAR05 Congestive heart failure 61 14 4.62 (4.49, 4.74) 2.46 (2.39, 2.54)
PSY07 Schizophrenia and affective psychoses 20 13 1.50 (1.44, 1.57) 1.52 (1.45, 1.60)
NUR05 Cerebrovascular disease 25 12 2.23 (2.14, 2.33) 1.35 (1.29, 1.40)
MAL03 High impact malignant neoplasms 27 9 3.10 (2.97, 3.23) 2.21 (2.12, 2.31)

Notes:aEDCs are listed in order of decreasing prevalence in the general adult service using population.

bIn the unweighted computations, the asthma patients' age distribution is unmodified. In the weighted computations, cases were weighted to produce an age distribution that approximated that of the population of general adult service users. Prevalences for adults with asthma are unweighted.

The most prevalent comorbidity among adult asthma patients was time-limited minor infections (ADG2): 56% had this ADG, an indicator of a variety of illnesses including acute bronchitis and acute upper respiratory tract infections (RTIs). A majority of adult asthma patients (59%) had either a chronic medical stable comorbid condition (ADG10) or a chronic medical unstable comorbidity (ADG11) or both. Examples of ADG10 conditions include essential hypertension, adult onset type 1diabetes and osteoarthritis; chronic liver disease, COPD and multiple sclerosis are examples of ADG11 conditions. The prevalences among adult asthma patients of ADGs 10 and 11 were 44% and 38%, respectively. One in 10 adult asthma patients had an allergy.

ADGs 2, 5 and 11 had the 3 largest ORs: 2.29 (95% CI = 2.26, 2.31); 2.29 (95% CI = 2.24, 2.34) and 3.68 (95% CI = 3.63, 3.73), respectively. The 28 ORs were recomputed after weights were applied to the adult asthma patient data to approximate the age distribution in the ASU population. The ORs changed, generally in the direction one would expect, but these 3 still had the largest ORs.

Table 4 shows the prevalences for 21 specific comorbid conditions–indicated by EDCs–in the adult asthma patient and ASU populations, and shows the ORs comparing the populations with respect to these EDCs. For each EDC the prevalence was higher for adult asthma patients than for ASUs. All 21 ORs were significantly larger than 1.

Among these 21 comorbidities are 10 that have been categorized by Broemeling et al.12b as “high impact and/or high prevalence” chronic conditions (HIHPCCs). (Broemeling et al. also categorized asthma, our index condition, as an HIHPCC.12) The impact of each condition was assessed in terms of expected short-term resource use and outcomes. The HIHPCCs are depression, hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, degenerative joint disease, cardiac arrhythmia, cancer, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular disease and COPD (including chronic bronchitis and emphysema). Note that in the interest of brevity we will use the term COPD to refer to the 3 conditions, recognizing that the “COPD” label is most applicable to patients 55 years of age or older.

Sixty percent of adult asthma patients had 1 or more additional HIHPCC, and 12%had 3 or more of these. One in 4 had depression and 1 in 6, hypertension. The prevalences of 3 of the HIHPCCs–high impact malignant neoplasms, congestive heart failure and COPD–were considerably higher (OR >= 2.0) in adult asthma patients than in ASUs. Adult asthma patients' odds of having depression were more than 50% higher than the odds for ASUs.

Figure 1
Comorbidity (Expanded Diagnosis Cluster) prevalences for four age and sex groups of asthma patientsa (1996/97)

Comorbidity (Expanded Diagnosis Cluster) prevalences for four age and sex groups of asthma patients (1996/97)

Notes:Aggregated Diagnosis Group labels are listed in Table 1.

aGirls and boys 5 to 17 years old, men and women 18 years old and over

Figure 2
Comorbidity (Aggregated Diagnosis Group) prevalences for four age and sex groups of asthma patientsa (1996/97)

Comorbidity (Aggregated Diagnosis Group) prevalences for four age and sex groups of asthma patients (1996/97)

Notes:Aggregated Diagnosis Group labels are listed in Table 1.

aGirls and boys 5 to 17 years old, men and women 18 years old and over

Of particular interest is the co-occurrence of additional chronic respiratory conditions in asthma patients. One in 5 adult asthma patients also had COPD, compared with 1.6% in the ASU population. Among asthma patients aged 56 and older, the proportion increased to 38% for men and 28% for women. The odds for adult asthma patients having COPD were 9.1 times larger than the odds for the ASU population. The ORs for acute lower and upper RTIs were 3.9 and 1.6, respectively.

Figures 1 and 2 show, respectively, the EDC and ADG profiles for male and female patients in the 5 to 17 years and 18 years and older age groups. The 4 EDC profiles were significantly different as were the 4 ADG profiles. Acute lower RTIs were the most prevalent comorbid condition for men and women and the second most prevalent for boys and girls, following acute upper RTIs. Otitis media was the third most prevalent condition in both boys and girls, while allergic rhinitis was fourth for boys and fifth for girls. COPD was more common in men than women, ranking second for men and sixth for women. Depression, anxiety and neuroses, however, were more prevalent in women, ranking second for women and fifth for men.

Discussion

The population of adult British Columbians with asthma has a higher overall illness burden than the province's general population of adult health care users. Each ADG category of comorbidity is significantly more prevalent in the asthma population. The proportion of the asthma population's members with 2 or more major ADGs is double the proportion of the general adult population. For each of 10 HIHPCCs, as well as 11 other specific comorbid conditions, the prevalence in adults with asthma was higher. This remains the case after adjusting for age differences in the two populations.

Although we expected to see a higher prevalence of allergies, acute respiratory conditions and COPD in the asthma population, we also found an increased prevalence for non-respiratory chronic conditions. In particular, we found that adult asthma patients have increased odds for having cancer, heart disease, stroke and arthritis. These findings have been reported by other investigators.6b In contrast to Ben-Noun22 and Adams et al.,6c however, we found diabetes to be significantly more prevalent in the adult asthma patient population than in the general adult population.

Having multiple chronic conditions is common for adults in BC,12c and this is particularly true for adult asthma patients where 1 in 8 had 3 or more HIHPCCs, increasing to 1 in 5 for adults 55 years and older. The most prevalent of the HIHPCCs in this multimorbidity subgroup were depression, hypertension, ischemic heart disease and COPD.

As Broemeling et al.12d point out, it is important to consider both impact and prevalence of comorbid chronic conditions in analyzing the health care needs of the asthma patient population. While it may be tempting to enhance patient care by focusing on treatment of asthma patients' depression because it is common, chronic conditions like COPD have a higher impact, in terms of health service utilization, albeit for a smaller proportion of asthma patients.

In contrast, and as expected, children with asthma are relatively free of major comorbidities. Fewer than 1 in 4 has any major ADGs and only 12% have 1 or more HIHPCCs. The most prevalent major comorbidity category is major injuries/adverse effects, and the most prevalent HIHPCC is depression.

The BC population of asthma patients is very heterogeneous, and many patients have complex treatment and self-management needs. As Adams et al.6d point out, age needs to be considered in planning care for patient subgroups: comorbidity profiles of children and older and younger adult populations differ considerably. We have also found that asthma patients of a particular age and sex can differ considerably in terms of their comorbidity profiles.

The literature and clinical practice guidelines tend to portray asthma patients as if they only had asthma. Knowing comorbidity prevalences for this (or any other condition-based) population and the similarities and differences in service needs of patient subgroups can help health system planners make more rational allocations of resources,23 and can enable clinicians, particularly those in primary care, to consider and develop holistic approaches to treatment. Chronic disease management strategies that are suitable for patients with a single chronic disease will need to be adapted for patients with multiple, possibly unrelated, chronic conditions. Self-management approaches that are more generic, such as those developed by Lorig et al.,24 may serve as a model.

Patients with multimorbidity face numerous barriers to following complex disease management plans,25 and some combinations of conditions make this particularly difficult. Increasing exercise might be an appropriate goal for an obese patient with diabetes, for example, but having asthma and arthritis as well might make this difficult to accomplish.26 Having depression, as 25% of adult BC asthma patients do, makes it difficult to maintain motivation to follow a treatment plan.27

We have compared two populations with respect to the prevalences of common acute and chronic conditions–a complete provincial population of adults with treated asthma and the province's general adult health service using population–using a standardized set of comorbidity identification algorithms. We have described the nature of the higher comorbidity burden of the asthma patient population. A variety of associations, between asthma and other respiratory and atopic conditions–links that clinicians and physiologists are familiar with–have been supported and given precise estimates at a population level.

In addition, we have compared the comorbidity prevalence profiles of male and female adults and children. These comparisons are possible because of the comprehensiveness of service use data from a large universal public health care system. In contrast to several other studies that have used small sample surveys and non-standard methods to identify comorbid conditions, the methodology of our study could be used to make precise comparisons of asthma patients' comorbidity profiles between jurisdictions that have population-based administrative data.

Several limitations of our study are a result of data access issues. Individual level data for the general adult population were not available to us: we relied on 1996/97 aggregated data reported by Reid et al.13h making it possible to perform a simple age-related weighting adjustment to adult asthma patients' data in computing ORs but not to match asthma patients to individuals without asthma by age and sex–a preferable approach that would reduce underestimation of associations. Further, we did not have access to general population children's data, precluding the type of comparisons we made for adults. Population comparisons based on more recent data, were we able to make them, could show different results. A comparison of adult asthma patients' comorbidity profiles across 5 years (results not shown) suggests that for the majority of conditions we examined, prevalence increased.

We recognize that we are really estimating prevalences of treated comorbidities. Patients with mild conditions for which they seldom if ever use physician or hospital services would not be counted as having the comorbidity. On the other hand, because the primary focus in health care planning is usually on users of the health care system, especially frequent or high-cost users, our current results are very relevant.

The case definition we used to identify asthma patients is similar to the one used by the BC Ministry of Health for surveillance purposes.28 Using a definition with a higher sensitivity–a more inclusive definition would probably create a more heterogeneous cohort–could have the effect of lowering the odds ratios we observed. In older patients it is often difficult to distinguish COPD from asthma because the two conditions share several clinical features including the symptoms of dyspnea, cough, wheezing and sputum production. If some asthma patients identified by the ACG algorithm as having COPD were false positives, the effect would be to lower the apparent prevalence of COPD in these patients.

In summary, our current research suggests that treated adult asthma patients have a significantly greater comorbidity burden than adults in the general population, both in terms of number of comorbid conditions and in terms of occurrence of specific conditions. While higher prevalences of additional respiratory and atopic conditions are expected, the higher prevalences of conditions like cancer are less so. These latter associations may provide a starting point for further clinical research.

References

  1. ^ Masoli M, Fabian D, Holt S, Beasley, R. The global burden of asthma: executive summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee report. Allergy. 2004;59(5):469-78.
  2. a,b Fortin M, Lapointe L, Hudson C, Vanasse A, Ntetu AL, Maltais D. Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2:51.
  3. a,b Sprangers MA, de Regt EB, Andries F. van Agt HM, Bijl RV, de Boer JB, Foets M, Hoeymans N, Jacobs AE, Kempen GI, Miedema HS, Tijhuis MA, de Haes HC. Which chronic conditions are associated with better or poorer quality of life? J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53(9):895-907.
  4. ^ Charlson M, Charlson R, Briggs W, Hollenberg J. Can disease management target patients most likely to generate high costs? The impact of comorbidity. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(4):464-9.
  5. a,b van Manen JG, Bindels PJ, Ijzermans CJ, van der Zee JS, Bottema BJ, Schadé E. Prevalence of comorbidity in patients with chronic airway obstruction and controls over the age of 40. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(3):287-93.
  6. a,b,c,d Adams RJ, Wilson DH, Taylor AW, Tursan d'Espaignet E, Dal Grande E, Ruffin RE. Coexistent chronic conditions and asthma quality of life: a population-based study. Chest. 2006;129(2):285-91.
  7. ^ Soriano JB, Visick GT, Muellerova H, Payvandi N, Hansell AL. Patterns of comorbidities in newly diagnosed COPD and asthma in primary care. Chest. 2005; 128(4):2099-107.
  8. ^ Diette GB, Krishnan JA, Dominici F, Haponik E, Skinner EA, Steinwachs D, Wu AW. Asthma in older patients: factors associated with hospitalization. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(10):1123-32.
  9. a,b Zhao Y, Ash AS, Ellis RP, Slaughter JP. Disease burden profiles: an emerging tool for managing managed care. Health Care Manage Sci. 2002;5(3):211-9.
  10. ^ Starfield B, Lemke KW, Bernhardt T, Foldes SS, Forrest CB, Weiner JP. Comorbidity: implications for the importance of primary care in ‘case' management. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(1):8-14.
  11. a,b Weiner J, Abrams C. ACG software documentation/users manual, version 5.0. Baltimore (MD): John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health:2001.
  12. a,b,c,d Broemeling A M, Watson DE, Black C. Chronic conditions and co-morbidity among residents of British Columbia. Vancouver (BC): UBC Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia; 2005.
  13. a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h Reid R, Evans R, Barer M, Sheps S, Kerluke K, McGrail K, Hertzman C, Pagliccia N. Conspicuous consumption: characterizing high users of physician services in one Canadian province. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(4):215-24.
  14. ^ Prosser RJ, Carleton BC, Smith MA. Identifying persons with treated asthma using administrative data via latent class modelling. Health Serv Res. 2008; 43(2):733-54.
  15. ^ Carlsson L. Patient based ‘burden-of-illness' in Swedish primary health care. Applying the Johns Hopkins ACG case-mix system in a retrospective study of electronic patient records. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2002;17(3):268-82.
  16. ^ Juncosa S, Bolibar B, Roset M, Tomas R. Performance of an ambulatory casemix measurement system in primary care in Spain: ambulatory care groups (ACGs). Eur J Public Health. 1999;9(1):27-35.
  17. ^ Orueta JF, Lopez-De-Munain J, Báez K, Aiarzaguena JM, Aranguren JI, Pedrero E. Application of the ambulatory care groups in the primary care of a European national health care system: does it work? Med Care. 1999;37(3):238-48.
  18. ^ Reid RJ, MacWilliam L, Verhulst L, Roos N, Atkinson M. Performance of the ACG case-mix system in two Canadian provinces. Med Care. 2001;39(1):86-99.
  19. ^ Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1997.
  20. ^ Westfall P. Simultaneous small-sample multivariate Bernoulli confidence intervals. Biometrics. 1985;41(4):1001-13.
  21. ^ SPSS Inc. SPSS 15.0 Command Syntax Reference. Chicago (IL): SPSS Inc.; 2006.
  22. ^ Ben-Noun L. Characteristics of comorbidity in adult asthma. Public Health Rev. 2001; 29(1):49-61.
  23. ^ Fleming DM, Pannell RS, Elliot AJ, Cross KW. Respiratory illness associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus infection. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:741-6.
  24. ^ Lorig K, Ritter P, Stewart A, Sobel D, Brown B, Bandura A, Gonzalez VM, Laurent DD, Holman HR. Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Medical Care. 2001;39:1217-23.
  25. ^ Bayliss EA, Steiner JF, Fernald DH, Crane LA, Main DS. Descriptions of barriers to self-care by persons with comorbid chronic diseases. Ann Fam Med. 2003; 1(1):15-21.
  26. ^ Grumbach K. Chronic illness, comorbidities, and the need for medical generalism. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(1):4-7.
  27. ^ Smith A, Krishnan JA, Bilderback A, Reikert KA, Rand CS, Bartlett SJ. Depressive symptoms and adherence to asthma therapy after hospital discharge. Chest. 2006;130(4):1034-38.
  28. ^ Asthma in British Columbia–an administrative data view [Internet]. Victoria (BC):British Columbia Health Services; 2004 May [cited 2009 May 5]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.bc.ca/cdm/research/asthmadataview.pdf
Report a problem or mistake on this page
Please select all that apply:

Thank you for your help!

You will not receive a reply. For enquiries, contact us.

Date modified: