Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP) - October 23 2025

On this page

Opening Remarks

Mr. Chair, thank you for the opportunity to present the Canada Revenue Agency’s actions in response to the Auditor General’s audit of its contact centres.

The Agency accepts the audit’s findings and acknowledges the importance of delivering timely, accessible service to Canadians.

With nearly 200 million service transactions annually, service delivery is central to the Agency’s mandate. We value our employees who give their best in serving Canadians. And we are committed to providing them with better tools to carry out their mission.

To address the audit’s recommendations, the Agency is building on its 100-Day Service Improvement Plan, running from September 2 to December 11, 2025.

This plan is structured around four key pillars:

  1. Increasing the ability to answer more calls;
  2. Expanding online self-service options;
  3. Addressing root causes of service issues; and,
  4. Accelerating service modernization.

Pillars 1 and 2 will deliver short-term results, while Pillars 3 and 4 focus more on longer term impact, beyond the 100-Day Plan.

Let's talk about results in the short-term, particularly on the accessibility of services.

The Agency increased the number of contact centre representatives. As a result, the percentage of calls answered has exceeded the plan’s target of 70%.

The Agency is enhancing its self-service digital options, including optimizing the website, adding features in My Account and expanding AI-based chat support.

To date, improvements include:

In the short term, efforts are also underway to improve the accuracy of responses provided by our contact centres

While we agree with the Auditor General’s findings, it is important to highlight certain nuances that, we hope, will reassure Canadians.

In 2018, the Agency implemented a new telephone system with call recording, a quality assurance program, targeted training, and technology-driven oversight.

During the last fiscal year, the Agency evaluated over 100,000 calls as part of this quality assurance program. Of these, 80% were related to specific taxpayer files. According to our results, these calls achieved an accuracy rate of 94%, which is confirmed by the Auditor General.

However, the Agency fully acknowledges that the remaining 20% of calls, which are related to general inquiries, still require improvement. In fact, the audit tested 167 calls related to general inquiries from individuals — which represents a small sample size — and the results showed that the Agency’s responses had an accuracy rate of 17%. This situation is concerning, and we are taking steps to address it.

To respond to audit findings, our quality assurance program is refocusing its evaluation criteria to emphasize the accuracy and completeness of information shared with callers.

Evaluations will more effectively inform improvements, including updated training materials, revised procedures, and individualized coaching.

Now let’s turn to longer-term improvements, which will extend beyond the 100-Day Plan.

In Pillar 3, it was also crucial for the Agency to identify and resolve the root causes of service-related problems.

Among these causes, we observed that the Agency’s high call volume is driven by population growth, evolving tax complexity, and lack of widespread self-serve tools.

As more Canadians seek personalized support, especially for nuanced topics, agents respond to longer, more detailed calls.

Many issues require expert guidance beyond digital platforms, reinforcing the need for accessible, responsive service channels.

To address these challenges, the Agency is:

Finally, under Pillar 4, as part of its long-term modernization strategy, the Agency assisted Shared Services Canada with the award a new competitive contract for a Contact Centre as a Service platform—a cutting-edge, secure, and reliable cloud-based technology used by leading organizations globally.

The Agency will also support Shared Services Canada in improving processes and clarifying roles and responsibilities to strengthen oversight and cost management of contracts with a revised agreement to be finalized in January 2026.

This new cloud-based platform will help provide a solid foundation for contact centre representatives, who will be equipped with state-of-the-art tools to carry out their mandate. It will allow Canadians to seamlessly move across service channels, improving their experience.

The Agency is fully committed to taking swift and sustained action to improve service delivery in its contact centres.

The 100-day plan has already yielded tangible results in the short term, and the Agency intends to make sustainable improvements in the longer term as well – including the implementation of modern platforms and AI tools – which will ensure continued progress.

We are pleased to answer your questions.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Issue Notes

OAG Report-related

OAG Report (Overall)

Issue: Does CRA agree with the OAG Report and its recommendations?

Key Points:

OAG Report (Improving Accuracy)

Issue: How is CRA improving contact centre accuracy?

Key Points:

OAG Report (Contact Centre Contracts)

Issue: What is the CRA doing to improve accountability with regards to contact centre contracts?

Key Points:

OAG Report (Shared Services Canada role)

Issue:What is Shared Services Canada (SSC) role in contracts for CRA’s contact centres? What role does CRA have in them?

Key Points:
Bell Canada contract

Background:

2017 OAG Report on Call Centres

Issue: Did the CRA implement the OAG’s 2017 recommendations to improve call centre performance?

Key Points:

100-Day Plan-related

100-Day Plan (high-level overview)

Issue: What is CRA’s 100-Day Plan (‘the Plan’)?

Key Points:

Pillar 1: Increase Ability to Answer Calls

Issue: How will CRA answer more calls?

Key Points:

Pillar 2: Expanding Digital Self-service Options

Issue: How is CRA is expanding digital / self-service options?

Key Points:
Specific Examples:

GenAI chatbot beta

MyAccount changes

Extended CRA Online Chat

Click to Talk

Manage Balance service

Pillar 3: Addressing the Root cause of Service Issues

Issue: How is CRA addressing the root causes of high-call volume and other service issues?

Key Points:

Improving delivery for high-demand workloads (Pillar 3)

Issue: How is CRA tackling areas of frequent, high-demand?

Key Points

Pillar 4: Accelerating Service Modernization

Issue: How is CRA speeding up service modernization?

Key Points

New call scheduling tools (Pillar 4)

Issue: How will the callback feature at CRA work?

Key Points

Tracking Implementation

Issue: How will the Government track implementation of the 100-day plan? Will you report on that publicly?

Key Points

100-Day Plan Cost

Issue: How much will the 100-day plan cost?

Key Points

100-Day Plan Staffing

Issue: How many more agents will the 100-day plan involve?

Key Points

Duration of 100-Day Plan

Issue: How long will these changes be in effect? Is this a permanent fix?

Key Points

Performance Issues

CRA Call Centre Quality & Accuracy

Issue: Are CRA agents providing accurate responses to Canadians?

Key Points

Increased Call Duration

Issue: Why are calls to CRA agents longer recently?

Key Points
Example:

Use of AI Tools

Issue:How is CRA using AI to better serve Canadians?

Key Points

Self-serve options

Issue: How is CRA providing / promoting self-serve options?

Key Points

Private Sector Collaboration / Consultants (Contact Centres)

Issue: Will CRA consult the private sector / consultants to improve service?

Key Points

Staffing Issues

CRA Workforce

Issue: Will CRA still be letting employees go despite the plan?

Key Points:

Comprehensive Expenditure Review

Issue: How will CRA be impacted by the Government’s Comprehensive Expenditure Review?

Key Points:

Term Contact Centre Employees

Issue: Why isn’t CRA renewing some term contracts for agents?

Key Points:

Service issues

Problem Resolution Service

Issue: Were there delays with the problem resolution service used by MPs?

Key Points:
Background:
Recent closed case volumes for both workloads are as follows:
Year Problem Resolution Service Service Complaints
2022/2023 27,298 10,808
2023/2024 33,832 14,900
2024/2025 39,967 19,702

2025-26 Service Standards

Issue: Why did CRA defer the annual publication of its External Service Standards (ESS) from Q1 to Q3?

Key Points:

Service Complaints

Issue: How many service complaints does the CRA receive?

Key Points:

Taxpayer Relief Provisions

Issue: Does CRA waive penalties and interest if they resulted from an incorrect answer from a CRA call agent?

Key Points:
Background:

The CRA administers legislation, commonly called the taxpayer relief provisions, which give the CRA discretion to cancel or waive penalties and interest when taxpayers cannot meet their tax obligations due to circumstances beyond their control.

Taxpayers or their authorized representative can make a request to cancel penalties and interest online using the CRA My Account, My Business Account or Represent a Client services by selecting “Request relief of penalties and interest”.

The CRA has an online tool designed to help Canadians determine if they should apply for penalties and interest relief. The CRA’s self-evaluation and learning tool (SELT) is a valuable resource for assisting taxpayers and representatives in understanding how to support their request for relief.

Hard-to-Reach / Vulnerable Populations

Issue: How is CRA improving outreach to vulnerable populations?

Key Points:

Improving Outreach to New Canadians

Issue: How is CRA improving outreach to new Canadians?

Key Points:

Outreach to Northern and Indigenous Communities

Issue: How is CRA improving outreach to vulnerable populations?

Key Points:

Automatic Tax Filing

Issue: What is the status of the automatic tax filing plan?

Key Points:

SimpleFile by Phone

Pre-filled tax returns in CRA’s MyAccount (PM announcement)

Supporting Documentation

OAG October 2025 Report - Contact Centres
https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/docs/parl_oag_202510_01_e.pdf
OAG Opening Statement to the News Conference
https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/osm_20251021_e_44732.html
Statement by the Minister on OAG 2025 Report - Contact Centres
https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/news/2025/10/the-minister-of-finance-and-national-revenue-and-the-secretary-of-state-canada-revenue-agency-and-financial-institutions-respond-to-the-auditor-gen.html
Action Plan (for PACP)
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/451/PACP/WebDoc/WD13538778/PACP-Sessional-ActionPlans/2025-OAG/RptCRA/CanadaRevenueAgency-e.pdf
Recap of OAG 2017 Audit – Call Centres

The following table lists the recommendations and responses found in the 2017 Fall Reports of the Auditor General of Canada to the Parliament of Canada, Report 2—Call Centres—Canada Revenue Agency.

The paragraph number preceding the recommendation indicates the location of the recommendation in the report, and the numbers in parentheses indicate the location of the related discussion.

https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201711_02_e_42667.html#hd2e

OTO response to 100-Day Plan
https://www.canada.ca/en/taxpayers-ombudsperson/news/2025/09/statement-from-the-taxpayers-ombudsperson-about-100-day-plan-to-strengthen-service-at-the-canada-revenue-agency.html
UTE response to 100-Day Plan
https://www.ute-sei.org/en/news-events/news/utes-response-minister-champagnes-letter
Tax Filing Trends (2016-2025)
T1 tax returns recieved
Tax Filing Season Total Number of T1 Returns ReceivedFootnote *
2016 29,059,445
2017 29,309,004
2018 29,784,503
2019 30,319,388
2020 30,916,517
2021 30,864,118
2022 31,303,684
2023 32,283,581
2024 33,454,068

2025

(as of Sept. 28, 2025)

32,951,536
  • The number of returns received as of September 28, 2025, was under 33M
  • With 4 months left in the tax filing season, this is already almost 7% more than what was received in the entire 2020 (30.9M) and 2021 tax filing seasons (30.8M)
CRA-administered programs & benefits
Total number of federal, provincial and territorial related benefit programs and services administered by the CRA
Year Benefit Programs and Services administered by the CRA
2016-2017 157
2017-2018 171
2018-2019 181
2019-2020 178
2020-2021 195
2021-2022 195
2022-2023 199
2023-2024 206
2024-2025 211

Parliamentary Information:

PACP Member Profiles

Standing Committee on Public Accounts (PACP) Committee Member Biographies – October 2025

About the Committee

Timing

As per a motion adopted on June 16, 2025, PACP conducts its meetings in the following manner with regards to timing:

Projected total time breakdown of questions for the October 28, 2025 PACP meeting:

PACP Member Profiles

John Williamson (Chair)

Conservative – Saint John—St. Croix (New Brunswick)

John Williamson

Biography

Prior to Williamson’s election to the House of Commons in 2011, he worked as Stephen Harper’s Director of Communications in the Office of the Prime Minister. Outside of elected office, Williamson established Canadians for Affordable Energy and held senior positions with the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, Atlantic Institute for Market Studies and the Manning Centre for Building Democracy. He was an editorial writer with the National Post at its inception in 1998 and founding member of the newspaper’s editorial board.

During his time in Parliament, Williamson has also served as a member of the House of Commons committee investigating all aspects of the Canada-China relationship.

Williamson has a master’s degree in economic history from the London School of Economics and a bachelor’s degree from McGill University.

CRA-related issues raised in Parliament
Recent correspondence to CRA (May 2025-present)

(Redacted).

Ned Kuruc

Conservative – Hamilton East—Stoney Creek (Ontario)

Ned Kuruc

Biography

Kuruc is a local entrepreneur and a former global sports entertainment executive. Ned has lived in Hamilton East-Stoney Creek his entire life, along with his wife Lisa and their three children, Vonn, Ilija, and Ivanna.

 

 

Recent correspondence to CRA (May 2025-present)

(Redacted).

Stephanie Kusie

Conservative – Calgary Midnapore (Alberta)

CPC Critic for Treasury Board and the King's Privy Council

Stephanie Kusie

Biography

Kusie was born and raised in the community of Calgary Midnapore and earned a degree in political science from the University of Calgary. Kusie went on to obtain her Masters in Business Administration from Rutgers University.

As a diplomat for the Canadian federal government, Kusie served in Argentina in 2006; was chargée d’affaires and Consul for Canada in El Salvador from 2006-2008; and Consul for Canada at the Consulate in Dallas, Texas from 2010-2013. She also served as policy advisor to the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs for the Americas in 2009. In 2018, Kusie was elected to the Executive Committee of the Canadian Section of ParlAmericas Interparliamentary Association. In March 2023, Kusie joined the Canadian Chapter of the Parliamentary Network on the World Bank and the IMF as an Executive Member. Kusie speaks English, French, and Spanish fluently.

CRA-related issues raised in Parliament
Recent correspondence to CRA (May 2025-present)

(Redacted).

Gérard Deltell

Conservative –Louis-Saint-Laurent—Akiawenhrahk (Quebec)

CPC Critic for National Revenue

Gérard Deltell

Biography

Deltell was born and raised in Quebec City. He held party membership in the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada in the 1980s. Deltell studied social science at Cégep de Sainte-Foy, graduating in 1984. He majored in history at Université Laval and graduated in 1989. He also received training as an announcer at the Collège des annonceurs radio télévision in 1982 and at École de radio et de télévision Promédia in 1993. He received a pilot’s license for ultralight aircraft in 2005.

Before he entered politics, Deltell worked as a TV correspondent with TQS. He also worked for TVA and Radio-Canada stations in Quebec City, as well as the CIRO-FM radio station as a radio show host. Overall, he worked as a journalist for a total of over 20 years.

Prior to entering federal politics, he represented Chauveau in the National Assembly of Quebec from 2008 to 2015 and was the leader of the Action démocratique du Québec (ADQ) from 2009 until it merged with the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) in 2012.

CRA-related issues raised in Parliament
Recent correspondence to CRA (May 2025-present)

(Redacted).

Sébastien Lemire

Bloc Québécois – Abitibi—Témiscamingue (Quebec)

PACP Vice-Chair
Bloc Québécois Critic for Public Accounts, Sports, and Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada

Sébastien Lemire

Biography

With degrees in political communication, public leadership, and corporate governance, Sébastien Lemire is a specialist in public relations and citizen participation. Before being elected in 2019, he worked at the Fédération de l'UPA d'Abitibi-Témiscamingue, the Mercier—Hochelaga-Maisonneuve borough of the City of Montreal, the Juripop Legal Clinic, Octane Stratégies, and the Forum jeunesse de l'Île de Montréal of the Conférence régionale des élus de Montréal.

CRA-related issues raised in Parliament
Recent correspondence to CRA (May 2025-present)

(Redacted).

Jean Yip

Liberal – Scarborough—Agincourt (Ontario)

PACP Vice-Chair

Jean Yip

Biography

Yip was born in Scarborough, and raised in Agincourt, and has deep roots in the community. After completing her degree at the University of Toronto, Yip pursued a career in insurance and underwriting, becoming a team leader in her field. Yip holds the Fellow Chartered Insurance Professional Designation.

Prior to becoming an MP, Yip has focused on her community and her family, stepping up to serve Scarborough—Agincourt. She has taught Sunday school at her church for over 13 years, and has been involved with the STEM Fellowship Board of Directors which promotes computer literacy and programming capacity among youth.

She also serves as Co-Chair of the Liberal Seniors Caucus. Yip is also a member of the Liberal Party’s Caucuses on Immigration, and Mental Health as well as Women’s and Scarborough Caucuses where she brings attention to the issues facing the people of Scarborough—Agincourt. Yip is a member of the Canada-China Legislative Association, as well as the Canada-Armenia, Canada-Philippines Parliamentary Friendship Group, and the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association.

CRA-related issues raised in Parliament
Recent correspondence to CRA (May 2025-present)

(Redacted).

Anthony Housefather

Liberal – Mount Royal (Quebec)

Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Emergency Management and Community Resilience

Anthony Horsefather

Biography

Housefather previously served as Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Services and Procurement, and Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Labour.

He also served as Special Advisor to the Prime Minister on Jewish Community Issues and Antisemitism and is co-chair of the Inter-Parliamentary Task Force on Online Antisemitism.

Prior to his election to the House of Commons, Anthony worked at Dialogic Corporation, a multinational technology company, where he rose through the ranks to become Executive Vice-President of Corporate Affairs and General Counsel. Anthony also served as a city councillor and then as Mayor of the City of Cote Saint-Luc for 10 years prior to being elected federally.

Housefather is active in his community, having served as a volunteer for many years with a number of community organizations. He is also a member of the local swim team. His performance in swimming earned him a total of twelve medals at the 2013 and 2017 Maccabiah Games, an international multi-sport competition held every four years in Israel.

Housefather holds a Bachelor of Civil Law and a Bachelor of Laws from McGill University, and a Master of Business Administration from Concordia University’s John Molson School of Business.

CRA-related issues raised in Parliament
Recent correspondence to CRA (May 2025-present)

(Redacted).

Tom Osborne

Liberal – Cape Spear (Newfoundland and Labrador)

Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Treasury Board

Tom Osborne

Biography

Prior to being elected, Osborne was the General Manager of the Dairy Farmers of Newfoundland and Labrador (DFNL).

Prior to being General Manager of DFNL, Osborne was a Member of the Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature.

Osborne holds the distinction as the longest serving member of the NL legislature in the history of the province. He has held several cabinet positions throughout his provincial political career, including Minister of Environment, Minister of Labour, Minister of Health, Minister of Justice, Minister of Finance and President of Treasury Board, Minister Responsible for the Human Resource Secretariat, the Public Service Commission, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Minister of Education and Minister of Service NL. Osborne was also elected as Speaker of the Legislature.

Recent correspondence to CRA (May 2025-present)

(Redacted).

Kristina Tesser Derksen

Liberal – Milton East—Halton Hills South (Ontario)

Kristina Tesser Derksen

Biography

Tesser Derksen is a devoted community leader with an impressive record of community service. A two-term elected town councillor, local lawyer, wife, mother, and engaged community member, Tesser Derksen has shown her determination to make life better for families in the community.

Tesser Derksen volunteers her time with several organizations, having sat as a Director on the boards of the Townsend Smith Foundation, Conservation Halton, Milton Chamber of Commerce, Milton Downtown Business Improvement Area and Canadian Federation of Women (CFUW). She is also a committee member of the Nassagaweya Community Consultation Committee and the Milton Quarry Community Advisory Committee.

Tesser Derksen’s professional career has always been in providing service: after several years working in the funeral service profession caring for families in Georgetown and Milton, Kristina studied law at the University of Toronto and runs her own Main Street practice in downtown Milton.

Relevant PACP Meeting Transcripts

PACP - Committee Transcript Recap

Committee Name:
House of Commons Public Accounts (PACP) Committee
Agenda:
Committee Business
Meeting Date
September 16, 2025, 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Items of note:

The public portion of the meeting (3:31PM - 4:23 PM) was solely focused on potential committee business for the fall of 2025, there were some brief references to the CRA during the meeting. No decisions were made in the public portion of the meeting about future business.

CRA service issues / Fall 2025 OAG report on Contact Centres During the meeting, CPC PACP Member (and CPC National Revenue critic) Gérard Deltell suggested that PACP take a close look at CRA in the fall, especially in the context of the upcoming OAG fall report on Contact Centres in October. Deltell complained that MPs have received “hundreds of calls from taxpayers” displeased with the CRA, as “80% of the people who call CRA don't get any answer … and only 5% of the people can actually reach somebody by telephone” despite this being an essential service for Canadians. Deltell also referenced media reports over the summer that showed incorrect information being provided to taxpayers by CRA contact centres as well (i.e. related to wrong information on TFSA contribution room, incorrect interest penalties being levied, etc), and that has jeopardized the financial well-being of many Canadians – especially seniors. Deltell further worried that CRA is not adequately supporting seniors that do not have online access or familiarity with computers. Deltell demanded that “CRA has to be accountable” and he was anxious to see what the upcoming OAG report would say – stressing that PACP should work together to investigate this issue.

  • Gérard Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent—Akiawenhrahk, CPC):
    We know that the Office of the Auditor General of Canada is expected to table a report on this subject in a few weeks, on October 7, if I'm not mistaken. I think we can all agree that this is an issue that affects all regions of Canada, from coast to coast. It's nothing to celebrate. We know that it's never easy to manage the agency because of new tax measures that are introduced. We recognize that. We are also aware that taxpayers are the ones who suffer the consequences of inadequate service. Media surveys conducted over the past few weeks show that 95% of people who try to contact someone at the agency over the phone are unsuccessful. We can understand that there may be issues over the summer. However, 95% is huge. Only 5% of people manage to talk to someone on the phone. This is not a lottery; it is a public service to which Canadians are entitled and that they pay for.
  • An article in La Presse mentioned cases where the agency wasn't even able to provide specific information to Canadians who wanted to invest in a tax-free savings account, or TFSA. If they can't get their facts straight on how much someone can invest in a TFSA, the very basis of Canadians' savings is at stake. The very basis of a TFSA investor's future is at stake here.
  • The media has also reported cases where mistakes were made. You'll see the common thread. Le Journal de Québec and Le Journal de Montréal reported that 78-year-old Mr. Roujeon had to pay interest on an amount he had already paid to the Canada Revenue Agency. We know how it works. When you receive a notice from the agency, it says that you have to pay immediately or else you will be charged interest. If you've already paid, why would you pay interest? While someone is trying to prove that they've paid, the interest is accumulating. In this case, the agency finally realized that it was absurd and it had made a mistake.
  • Canadians in general are honest, hard-working people, apart from a few scofflaws. Hard-working people of good faith don't expect the Canadian government to treat them like thieves. However, that is what happened.
  • Another case involves 83-year-old Mr. Derome. The CRA claimed that he had phantom revenue that, as it turned out, was non-existent. These examples are cited in Le Journal de Québec and Le Journal de Montréal. Aside from the fact that they were mistreated by the agency, the common thread between these two is that they are an 83-year-old man and a 78-year-old man.
  • That brings me to a very important issue. Our seniors are the ones who built Canada and the wealth Canadians now enjoy. The least we can do is treat them with dignity. They shouldn't be taken for crooks, thieves or anything of the sort. We must not forget that these people, who were born in the 1930s and 1940s, are not digital natives. As a result, we need to respect their wishes. What they want is to have direct phone contact, to speak directly to a person.

CPC PACP Member William Stevenson also agreed that CRA needs to be more aware of the challenges that seniors face – fearing CRA’s modernization may be ageist and discriminatory against seniors.

  • William Stevenson (Yellowhead, CPC):
    … Mr. Deltell discussed how the modernizing of CRA was making it difficult and was becoming somewhat ageist or discriminatory toward those who are technically challenged in dealing with CRA.

Later in the meeting, Bloc Québécois Sébastien Lemire also voiced support for looking closely at CRA, as he was also hearing concerns and especially among seniors.

  • Sébastien Lemire (Abitibi—Témiscamingue, BQ):
    While the meeting is still public, I would like to say that I support what Mr. Deltell on the Conservative side said about the timeliness of the services provided to people, particularly seniors. In my riding, I too have seen people having problems at the Canada Revenue Agency. I even travelled around talking to seniors, and we wrote a report about it. This is a real problem. I think it would be particularly interesting to take a look at it.

PACP - Quick Committee Recap

Committee Name:
House of Commons Public Accounts (PACP) Committee
Agenda:
2025 Reports 5 to 10 of the Auditor General of Canada
Witnesses:
Office of the Auditor General
Meeting Date (video/audio link):
Tuesday, October 21, 2025, 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
Items of note:

The Office of the Auditor General appeared to speak to the ‘2025 Reports 5 to 10 of the Auditor General of Canada’ as a whole. Canada Revenue Agency Contact Centres was a significant focus of the meeting, with interventions as follows:

  • In her opening statement, the Auditor General noted that she was concerned that “in spite of a new telephony system and other improvements, Canadians are still waiting too long to get answers to their tax questions.” She explained that during the last fiscal year, callers choosing to speak with an agent weighted on average 31 minutes, more than twice as long as the agencies service standard of 15 minutes – and when callers did reach an agent, they were often provided with inaccurate information. The Auditor General noted the audit found agents responses to individual tax questions were accurate only 17% of the time, and business tax or benefit questions accurate just over half of the time. She noted though that agent responses to account specific questions had much higher accuracy rates.
  • CPC PACP Member (and CPC National Revenue critic) Gérard Deltell complained that Canadians are ‘terribly harassed’ by the CRA – and don’t even receive timely or correct information. He complained ‘mediocrity’ exists at CRA – as it largely never meets its service standards and provides incorrect information 4/5 of the time. He called this a ‘lack of respect for taxpayers’, and asked how CRA reached this ‘level of mediocrity’; the Auditor General explained that while CRA “definitely would like to provide better service”, Canadians are frustrated with long wait times and not getting exact information – stating “there is a great deal of improvement that can be made at the CRA.”
    • Deltell wanted to know about the increase in the telephone system contract to $110 million; the Auditor General explained that she “saw so many red flags with this particular contract that I thought we should look more closely at the contract for at the call centres that are managed by Shared Services Canada”, as there was the need for more exactness.
  • CPC PACP Member Stephanie Kusie called the OAG’s finding “another damning report that Canadians continue to pay more and get less”, especially despite the OAG audit in 2017 and CRA’s previous efforts to address the issue. Kusie was surprised that ‘the priority for the CRA is adhering to shift and breaks’ rather than accuracy and completeness. She also complained that seniors were being treated poorly by CRA agents during the personal information authentication process – calling this “unacceptable service”; the Auditor General underlined there were ‘lots of opportunities’ for CRA to improve – especially having more than 10% of an agent's annual performance review based on the accuracy and completeness of their responses as that “does not encourage a good culture where accuracy and completeness is top of mind.” She agreed that Canadians “expect CRA will be available in a timely fashion and provide them with accurate information. And what we're seeing is that that is not the case.” She did note though that CRA had improved some service to specific question responses since 2017, but responses “haven't gotten better” since 2017 on general questions. She added that CRA’s MyAccount – which was meant to take calls away from call centres – now represent most of the calls received, with callers trying to access MyAccount.
  • Kusie pointed to issues with the IBM contract and the increased costs – worried that neither Shared Services Canada nor CRA could confirm whether the invoice levels of activity, which were the basis for the charges invoice to the agency, were accurate. She declared “we're seeing this same type of practice that we saw in ArriveScam”; the Auditor General explained the contact covers three departments, but that they found ‘invoices received very little scrutiny and as CRA didn't verify the accuracy of what was being charged. So there were enough red flags here for me and my inability to conclude value for money’ – noting she will be auditing the contract.
  • Liberal PACP Member Tom Osborne conceded that nearly all MPs have received complaints about the slowness at CRA, wondering if the Government’s recently announced 100-day plan would help address the gaps identified in the OAG report; the Auditor General said that CRA agents don’t have the tools they need to address the calls, also CRA needs to change their culture that is currently placing greater importance on how closely they adhered to their schedules for shift and breaks – rather than accuracy and completeness of information they provided to callers. The Auditor General said she trusted that the 100-day plan and the CRA’s response to the OAG report’s specific recommendations should service to improve the situation.
  • Bloc Québécois PACP Member Sébastien Lemire complained that CRA agents only giving accurate information 17% of time is having a major negative impact on Canadians, and questioned why CRA has not improved the situation since 2017; Auditor General explained that the situation from 2017 has changed depending on the type of question asked – general questions are answered incorrectly still, but more specific questions are generally being answered correctly (so there was a ‘margin of improvement’ in that respect). OAG clarified that there was no difference when agents answering in English and French.
  • Lemire complained why CRA was leaning on IBM systems here given their poor track record with the Phoenix pay system; Auditor General confirmed there were a lot of ‘red flags’ on management of the contracts, especially on authentication of invoices – as such, the OAG would bring forward an audit in 2026 to Parliament on the matter.
  • Lemire wondered about the use of AI to improve service to Canadians; Auditor General noted that CRA has a chatbot that provided correct response 2 out of 6 times (which was better than the overall response from CRA call centre agents) but conceded that not all Canadians would be comfortable to use it. Lemire then quired if CRA could create a specialized call centre for seniors; Auditor General explained that report did not look at that and the OAG was unsure about its feasibility – though added CRA had a ‘Northern-based’ call centre.
  • Liberal PACP Member Jean Yip asked if the CRA’s shift to digital improvements would help address the concerns in the OAG report – especially self-serve options and extended chat hours; the Auditor General said digital improvements aligned with the report’s recommendations. She highlighted the need for improving the CRA chatbot, which performed worse when compared to other publicly available AI tools. She also added that agents need access to better tools to find correct information more quickly and reduce call duration (30% of call time was spent on hold as agents looked for information). She also said better work needs to be done to divert the calls related to access to MyAccount, as those are currently most calls.
  • CPC PACP Member William Stevenson explained he had ‘wasted lots of time’ waiting for CRA calls to be answered as a former CPA. He noted the OAG report showed number of CRA call centre agents has been reduced in recent years – and asked if this was part of a push to self-service; the Auditor General said number of agents indeed has a direct impact on quality and timeliness of service received, but the number of agents depends on budget constraints at given period.
    • Stevenson again complained that seniors were having lots of issues with CRA.
    • Stevenson noted there appeared to be little training for CRA call centre agents (“seems like virtually none)”; the Auditor General agreed that CRA provides limited feedback or training to agents, and that is especially needs to better triage calls to specialized agents that can be trained for specific issues. She repeated again that having only 10% of an agent's annual performance review based on the accuracy and completeness was creating culture issues – and CRA needs to do a better job at focusing on stressing the importance of accuracy.
  • Liberal PACP Member Anthony Housefather asked for confirmation of the audit period; the Auditor General noted it ended on June 30th – and would not have picked up improvements from the 100-day plan, as that occurred after the audit period.
    • Housefather was puzzled by the ‘bizarre’ situation that CRA’s chatbot performed worse than other publicly available AI tools – ‘how is it possible that CRA’s specially created tool is worse than average AI chatbot tool that can be accessed online’; Auditor General said that was an excellent question for the CRA, but that its chatbot was only populated with general personal tax information (not business tax information). Housefather wondered it the chatbot should be eliminated or more information should be uploaded to allow for more information; Auditor General said the future of the CRA chatbot was a CRA management decision, but CRA had to be more cognizant of Canadians desire to self-serve.
  • Near the end of the meeting, CPC PACP Member (and CPC National Revenue critic) Gérard Deltell moved a motion for a PACP study (starting on October 23, 2025) on the CRA Contact Centres report as follows (below is an unofficial AI transcript should not be quoted):
    Que compte tenu de graves préoccupations soulevées dans le rapport de la Vérificatrice générale concernant les centres de contact de l'Agence du revenu du Canada indiquant des manquements importants à fournir aux Canadiens des renseignements opportuns et exacts sur les impôts et les prestations, le comité entreprenne immédiatement une étude sur cet audit et l'étude examine dans quelle mesure ces manquements ont touché les contribuables et les bénéficiaires de prestations, en particulier les Canadiens à faible revenu, les aînés et les familles qui dépendent de paiements de prestations versées en temps opportun. Le comité tienne sa première réunion sur cette étude le jeudi 23 octobre 2025 et des représentants de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, y compris le commissaire du revenu, les sous commissaires responsables des services ainsi que les hauts fonctionnaires concernés, des directions des centres d'appels et des prestations soient convoquées à cette réunion conjointement avec la Vérificatrice générale du Canada.
    • The PACP Chair voiced support for the motion, as he noted this was an issue that had impacted all MPs offices. Deltell also noted that CRA’s poor service was forcing Canadians to hire accountants for information.
    • After limited debate on the motion, it passed unanimously.
Follow-ups for CRA:
CRA will be required to appear before PACP on October 23, 2025 as part of the Committee’s study of the CRA Contact Centres report.

Page details

2026-02-12