ARCHIVED – Enhanced Language Training Initiative: Formative Evaluation

Interview Guide

Other Government Department Representatives

This interview is being undertaken as part of the evaluation of the Enhanced Language Training (ELT) Initiative. Goss Gilroy Inc. has been hired to carry out the evaluation over the period of January to April 2007. Several methodologies are being used for the evaluation including a survey of service providers, focus groups with clients, case studies of funded projects, and interviews with CIC, provincial representatives, service providers, employers and other stakeholder representatives. It is as part of the interviews that you are being asked to participate. Please note that anything you say will be kept confidential. Your comments will not be associated to you but rather reported in aggregate. This interview will take about 30 minutes to complete.

1. Please describe your familiarity and role with the Enhanced Language Training (ELT) Initiative.

2. In your opinion, to what extent do you believe that the ELT model is appropriate (i.e., development of materials, delivery of language training to immigrants with a focus on occupations, bridge-to-work component)?

  1. On what do you base your answers?
  2. How could it be improved?
  3. Does ELT offer added value to existing programs?

3. To what extent is labor market integration of immigrants a challenge? Why do you believe this?

  1. Is it more of a challenge in relation to particular occupations, regions/cities?
  2. Do you believe that labor market integration of immigrants is an important area for continued federal government involvement? Why or why not?

4. Are there other workforce integration programs available to immigrants?

  1. Can you briefly describe them?
  2. Who delivers that program/those programs?
  3. How do they compare with ELT (i.e., in terms of objectives, activities, focus on language or skills or workforce integration)?

5. To your knowledge, do you believe that the design and operation of ELT is cost-effective (i.e., compared to other programs, considering the delivery mechanism)?

  1. Why or why not?
  2. On what do you base your answers (e.g., feedback from clients, service providers)?

6. Do you believe that language training at advanced levels (i.e., at CLB levels 6 to 10) is an important area for continued federal government involvement? Why or why not?

Do you have any other comments you would like to make at this time?

Thank you very much for your time!

Page details

Date modified: