Ehrlichia chaffeensis: Infectious substances pathogen safety data sheet
Section I – Infectious agent
Name
Ehrlichia chaffeensis
Agent type
Bacteria
Taxonomy
Family
Anaplasmataceae
Genus
Ehrlichia
Species
chaffeensis
Synonym or cross-reference
Ehrlichiosis, human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME), Ehrlichia ewingii, Ehrlichia muris eauclairensis, Rikettsial diseases, undetermined ehrlichiosis/anaplasmosis.
Characteristics
Brief description
Ehrlichia chaffeensis is a tick-borne Gram-negative obligatory intracellular bacterium of the family Anaplasmataceae in the order RickettsialesFootnote 1. Its genome consists of a single small (1.18 Mbp) circular genome that lacks most genes for amino-acid biosynthesis and intermediary metabolism and consequently, the bacterium depends on host cells for these moleculesFootnote 2. In humans, they reside and propagate in bone marrow-derived cells, such as granulocytes, monocytes, erythrocytes, and platelets within vacuoles. These intracytoplasmic clusters of bacteria are found in two forms; as small dense core forms (0.2 to 0.4 µm) or larger forms (0.8 to 1.5 µm) that resemble reticulate bodiesFootnote 3. Infection in humans causes a severe flu-like febrile disease called human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME), which is often accompanied by hematologic abnormalities and signs similar to those of hepatitisFootnote 4.
Properties
As an obligate intracellular bacteria, E. chaffeensis has adaptations that aid in avoiding detection by the host immune system. The bacteria replicates within monocytes and macrophages, which are primary immune cells that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). To avoid detection, E. chaffeensis has lost genes encoding major PAMPs such as lipopolysaccharide, peptidoglycan, flagella, and common piliFootnote 5. E. chaffeensis invasin EtpE (entry-triggering protein of Ehrlichia) binding to the host surface receptor DNase X induces internalization into host cells without activating a phagocytic response. Once inside the host cell, bacterium replicate inside vacuoles which further shields it from the host immune responseFootnote 6.
Section II – Hazard identification
Pathogenicity and toxicity
Although ehrlichiosis is a general term used to describe disease caused by E. chaffeensis, Ehrlichia ewingii and Ehrlichia muris eauclairensis, the majority of reported cases in humans are due to infection caused by E. chaffeensisFootnote 7. Symptoms of early illness include fever, chills, dull/severe headaches, myalgia, malaise, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and loss of appetiteFootnote 8Footnote 9. In addition, ehrlichiosis patients may present with symptoms of confusion or changes in mental state and rashFootnote 10Footnote 11. Ehrlichiosis typically manifests with leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and elevated hepatic transaminasesFootnote 12. More severe symptoms can lead to multi-organ failureFootnote 11Footnote 13 and manifests in vital organs such as the heart, kidney, liver, spleen and lung and can be accompanied with mental confusionFootnote 11. Additionally, ehrlichiosis may be complicated by hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in rare cases and in immunocompromised situations, such as in transplant patientsFootnote 11Footnote 13. The clinical manifestations of E. chaffeensis infections appear to be due to the host inflammatory response to the infection rather than direct damage from the bacteria. Fatality rate as high as 3% is seen for E. chaffeensis infectionsFootnote 14.
Epidemiology
Ehrlichiosis caused by E. chaffeensis is seen primarily in North America, but there are reports of the disease in Europe and in Asian countries such as China, Japan, and South KoreaFootnote 14Footnote 15Footnote 16Footnote 17Footnote 18. Maintenance of tick-borne E. chaffeensis in nature depends upon the presence of appropriate tick vectors and mammalian hosts in the local environment. In North America, E. chaffeensis is maintained in a cycle involving the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and the lone star tick (Amblyomma americanum), which play a role as its primary reservoir and vector, respectivelyFootnote 1. E. chaffeensis has also been detected in coyotes, foxes, gray wolves, raccoons, opossums, goats and domestic dogsFootnote 7Footnote 19.
As ehrlichiosis is a tickborne disease, it is more common from May through to AugustFootnote 7. In the United Sates, the number of reported cases on ehrlichiosis caused by E. chaffeensis has steadily increased from 200 cases in the year 2000 up to a peak of 2093 cases in 2019Footnote 20. These figures are likely underestimates, as active surveillance in Tennessee has shown infection rates as high as 330–414 cases per 100,000 population (0.3%–0.4%)Footnote 7. In the United States during the period from 2008 to 2012, 4613 cases of E. chaffeensis infection were reported, corresponding to an incidence rate of 3.2 cases per million persons-yearsFootnote 21. The hospitalization rate was 57% while the fatality rate was 1%.
Older individuals, patients with comorbidities, and immunocompromised patients are at higher risk for a severe disease if left untreatedFootnote 14.
Host range
Natural host(s)
White-tailed deer, humans and domestic animalsFootnote 15.
Other host(s)
White-footed mice, hamsters, and red-backed voles have been inoculated but do not show signs of infection, disease or seropositivityFootnote 22. Immunocompromised C3H/HeJ mice have been infected.
Infectious dose
Unknown.
Incubation period
Median incubation period is 9 daysFootnote 1.
Communicability
Most people develop ehrlichiosis after a tick bite from an infected tickFootnote 1. In rare cases, E. chaeffeensis may be transmitted through blood transfusion and organ transplantationFootnote 23.
Section III – Dissemination
Reservoir
White tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) is the principal animal reservoir of E. chaffeensis. They are persistently bacteremic, but do not develop clinical signs of infectionFootnote 24Footnote 25. Dogs, foxes, wolves, coyotes and cats are also known animal reservoirsFootnote 9Footnote 26Footnote 27.
Zoonosis
None.
Vectors
Lone Star tick (Amblyomma americanum); black-legged ticks (Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus). American dog ticks (Dermacentor variabilis and D. occidentalis) are less common carriersFootnote 28.
Section IV – Stability and viability
Drug susceptibility/resistance
Doxycycline is a wide spectrum antibiotic of choice for ehrlichiosis; early treatment can prevent death and severe illnessFootnote 9Footnote 11Footnote 16. Many antibiotics such as b-lactams, cephalosporins, macrolides, and aminoglycosides are ineffective against E. chaffeensis in vitroFootnote 7.
Susceptibility to disinfectants
Susceptible to 1% sodium hypochlorite, 70% ethanol, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, and quaternary ammonium disinfectantsFootnote 29.
Physical inactivation
Sensitive to moist heat (121°C) for at least 15 minutes and dry heat (160°C–170°C) for at least 1 hourFootnote 28Footnote 30.
Survival outside host
E. chaffeensis is an obligate intracellular bacteria and are sensitive to mechanical stress such as freezing and thawing, and osmolarity changesFootnote 1Footnote 29.
Section V – First aid/medical
Surveillance
Monitor for symptoms of illness; confirmation through diagnostic testing such as Romanowsky stains, PCR, and serological tests (indirect immunofluorescence) which detect Ehrlichia species in blood, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), tissue, and ticks, or Ehrlichia-specific antibodies in serumFootnote 1.
Note: The specific recommendations for surveillance in the laboratory should come from the medical surveillance program, which is based on a local risk assessment of the pathogens and activities being undertaken, as well as an overarching risk assessment of the biosafety program as a whole. More information on medical surveillance is available in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.
First aid/treatment
People bitten by a tick are advised to remove the tick and subsequently watch for signs and symptoms of illness. If signs such as fever, rash, fatigue, or myalgia develop, the recommendation is to see a physician within 14 days of the tick bite. A wide spectrum tetracycline based antibiotic, doxycycline, is the first line of treatment for positive diagnostic tests indicating signs of ehrlichiosisFootnote 7.
Note: The specific recommendations for first aid/treatment in the laboratory should come from the post-exposure response plan, which is developed as part of the medical surveillance program. More information on the post-exposure response plan can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.
Immunization
No vaccines are available for humansFootnote 20.
Note: More information on the medical surveillance program can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook, and by consulting the Canadian Immunization Guide.
Prophylaxis
No known post-exposure prophylaxis.
Note: More information on prophylaxis as part of the medical surveillance program can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.
Section VI – Laboratory hazard
Laboratory-acquired infections
No cases of laboratory-acquired infections have been reported.
Note: Please consult the Canadian Biosafety Standard and Canadian Biosafety Handbook for additional details on requirements for reporting exposure incidents.
Sources/specimens
Whole blood, CSF, eschar swab or tissue. Cultures and frozen stocksFootnote 1.
Primary hazards
Ingestion, accidental parenteral inoculation, and direct contact with skin or mucous membranes with cultures/infected tissues/body fluids and inhalation of aerosols of contaminated fluids.
Special hazards
Direct contact with an slaughtered infected animalFootnote 10.
Section VII – Exposure controls/personal protection
Risk group classification
Ehrlichia chafeensis is a Risk Group 3 Human Pathogen and Risk Group 2 Animal PathogenFootnote 31.
Containment requirements
Containment Level 3 facilities, equipment, and operational practices outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard for work involving infectious or potentially infectious materials, animals, or cultures.
Protective clothing
The applicable Containment Level 3 requirements for personal protective equipment and clothing outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard are to be followed. At minimum, use of full body coverage dedicated protective clothing, dedicated protective footwear and/or additional protective footwear, gloves when handling infectious materials or animals, face protection when there is a known or potential risk of exposure to splashes or flying objects, respirators when there is a risk of exposure to infectious aerosols, and an additional layer of protective clothing prior to work with infectious materials or animals.
Note: A local risk assessment will identify the appropriate hand, foot, head, body, eye/face, and respiratory protection, and the personal protective equipment requirements for the containment zone must be documented.
Other precautions
All activities involving open vessels of pathogens are to be performed in a certified biological safety cabinet (BSC) or other appropriate primary containment device. The use of needles, syringes, and other sharp objects are to be strictly limited. Additional precautions must be considered with work involving animals or large scale activities.
Proper precautions should be considered when working with infected arthropods. This might include implementing a program to prevent escapes and monitor any escaped arthropods, as well as using suitable personal protective equipment (PPE), among other measuresFootnote 32Footnote 33.
Section VIII – Handling and storage
Spills
Allow aerosols to settle. Wearing personal protective equipment, gently cover the spill with absorbent paper towel and apply suitable disinfectant, starting at the perimeter and working towards the centre. Allow sufficient contact time with disinfectant before clean up (Canadian Biosafety Handbook).
Disposal
Regulated materials, as well as all items and waste to be decontaminated at the containment barrier prior to removal from the containment zone, animal room, animal cubicle, or post mortem room. This can be achieved by using decontamination technologies and processes that have been demonstrated to be effective against the infectious material, such as chemical disinfectants, autoclaving, irradiation, incineration, an effluent treatment system, or gaseous decontamination (Canadian Biosafety Handbook).
Storage
The applicable Containment Level 3 requirements for storage outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard are to be followed. Primary containers of regulated materials removed from the containment zone to be stored in a labelled, leak-proof, impact-resistant secondary container, and kept either in locked storage equipment or within an area with limited access.
An inventory of RG3 pathogens in long-term storage, to be maintained and to include:
- specific identification of the regulated materials
- a mechanism that allows for the detection of a missing or stolen sample in a timely manner
Section IX – Regulatory and other information
Canadian regulatory information
Controlled activities with Ehrlichia chaffeensis require a Pathogen and Toxin licence issued by the Public Health Agency of Canada. E. chaffeensis is a terrestrial animal pathogen in Canada; therefore, importation of E. chaffeensis requires an import permit under the authority of the Health of Animals Regulations (HAR). The PHAC issues a Pathogen and Toxin Licence which includes a Human Pathogen and Toxin Licence and an HAR importation permit.
The following is a non-exhaustive list of applicable designations, regulations, or legislations:
- Human Pathogens and Toxins Act and Human Pathogens and Toxins Regulations
- Health of Animals Act and Health of Animals Regulations
Last file update
June, 2024
Prepared by
Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada.
Disclaimer
The scientific information, opinions, and recommendations contained in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet have been developed based on or compiled from trusted sources available at the time of publication. Newly discovered hazards are frequent and this information may not be completely up to date. The Government of Canada accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, sufficiency, or reliability or for any loss or injury resulting from the use of the information.
Persons in Canada are responsible for complying with the relevant laws, including regulations, directives and standards applicable to the import, transport, and use of pathogens and toxins in Canada set by relevant regulatory authorities, including the Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment and Climate Change Canada, and Transport Canada. The risk classification and related regulatory requirements referenced in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet, such as those found in the Canadian Biosafety Standard, may be incomplete and are specific to the Canadian context. Other jurisdictions will have their own requirements.
Copyright © Public Health Agency of Canada, 2024, Canada
References
- Footnote 1
-
Reller, M.E. and Dumler, J.S. (2015). Ehrlichia, Anaplasma, and Related Intracellular Bacteria. Manual of Clinical Microbiology (eds J.H. Jorgensen, K.C. Carroll, G. Funke, M.A. Pfaller, M.L. Landry, S.S. Richter, D.W. Warnock, K.C. Carroll, G. Funke, K.A. Bernard, J.S. Dumler, M.B. Miller, C.A. Petti and P.A.R. Vandamme).
- Footnote 2
-
Dunning Hotopp, J. C., Lin, M., Madupu, R., Crabtree, J., Angiuoli, S. V., Eisen, J., et al. (2006). Comparative Genomics of Emerging Human Ehrlichiosis Agents. PloS Genet. 2, e21
- Footnote 3
-
Rikihisa Y. (2022) The "Biological Weapons" of Ehrlichia chaffeensis: Novel Molecules and Mechanisms to Subjugate Host Cells. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 11:830180.
- Footnote 4
-
Dawson, J. E., Anderson, B. E., Fishbein, D. B., Sanchez, J. L., Goldsmith, C. S., Wilson, K. H., and Duntley, C. (1991). Isolation and Characterization of an Ehrlichia sp. From a Patient Diagnosed With Human Ehrlichiosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29, 2741–2745
- Footnote 5
-
Lin, M., and Rikihisa, Y. (2003). Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum Lack Genes for Lipid A Biosynthesis and Incorporate Cholesterol for Their Survival. Infect. Immun. 71, 5324–5331.
- Footnote 6
-
Lin, M., and Rikihisa, Y. (2007). Degradation of P22phox and Inhibition of Superoxide Generation by Ehrlichia chaffeensis in Human Monocytes. Cell Microbiol. 9, 861–874
- Footnote 7
-
Dumler, J. S., Madigan, J. E., Pusterla, N., and Bakken, J. S. (2007). Ehrlichioses in humans: epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 45 Suppl 1, S45–S51
- Footnote 8
-
Biggs, H. M., Behravesh, C. B., Bradley, K. K., Dahlgren, F. S., Drexler, N. A., Dumler, J. S., Folk, S. M., Kato, C. Y., Lash, R. R., Levin, M. L., Massung, R. F., Nadelman, R. B., Nicholson, W. L., Paddock, C. D., Pritt, B. S., and Traeger, M. S. (2016). Diagnosis and Management of Tickborne Rickettsial Diseases: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and Other Spotted Fever Group Rickettsioses, Ehrlichioses, and Anaplasmosis - United States. MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports, 65(2), 1–44.
- Footnote 9
-
Stone, J. H., Dierberg, K., Aram, G. and Dumler, J. S. (2004). Human monocytic ehrlichiosis. JAMA 292, 2263–2270.
- Footnote 10
-
Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis. Available at https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/ehrlichiosis/symptoms-causes/syc-20372142.
- Footnote 11
-
Al Majali, F., Oleary, C., Hallcox, T., Lok, J., Hermelin, D., Guenette, A. and Nazzal, M. (2022). Ehrlichiosis in a Recent Liver Transplant Recipient Leading to Multiorgan Failure. Case Reports in Transplantation. 2022. 1-3. 10.1155/2022/3062836
- Footnote 12
-
Olano, J. P., Masters, E., Hogrefe, W. and Walker, D. H. (2003). Human monocytotropic ehrlichiosis, Missouri. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9, 1579–1586.
- Footnote 13
-
Kaplan, R. M., Swat, S. A. and Singer, B. D. (2016). Human monocytic ehrlichiosis complicated by hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and multi-organ dysfunction syndrome. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 86, 327–328.
- Footnote 14
-
Madison-Antenucci, S., Kramer, L. D., Gebhardt, L. L. and Kauffman, E. (2020). Emerging Tick-Borne Diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 33.
- Footnote 15
-
Ganguly, S. and Mukhopadhayay, S. K. (2008). Tick-borne ehrlichiosis infection in human beings. J. Vector Borne Dis. 45, 273–280.
- Footnote 16
-
Ehrlichiosis. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/ehrlichiosis/healthcare-providers/signs-symptoms.html.
- Footnote 17
-
Wen, B., Cao, W. and Pan, H. (2003). Ehrlichiae and ehrlichial diseases in china. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 990, 45–53.
- Footnote 18
-
Su, H. et al. Serologic Evidence of Human Exposure to Ehrlichiosis Agents in Japan. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 28, 2355–2357 (2022).
- Footnote 19
-
André, M. R. (2018). Diversity of Anaplasma and Ehrlichia/Neoehrlichia Agents in Terrestrial Wild Carnivores Worldwide: Implications for Human and Domestic Animal Health and Wildlife Conservation. Frontiers in veterinary science, 5, 293.
- Footnote 20
-
Ehrlichiosis Epidemiology and Statistics | Ehrlichiosis | CDC. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/ehrlichiosis/data-research/facts-stats/index.html
- Footnote 21
-
Nichols Heitman, K., Dahlgren, F. S., Drexler, N. A., Massung, R. F., and Behravesh, C. B. (2016). Increasing Incidence of Ehrlichiosis in the United States: A Summary of National Surveillance of Ehrlichia chaffeensis and Ehrlichia ewingii Infections in the United States, 2008-2012. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 94(1), 52–60.
- Footnote 22
-
Telford, S.R. and Dawson, J.E. (1996). Persistent infection of C3H/HeJ mice by Ehrlichia chaffeensis. Veterinary Microbiology, Volume 52, Issues 1–2:103-112.
- Footnote 23
-
Saha, A., Browning, C., Dandamudi, R., Barton, K., Graepel, K., Cullity, M., Abusalah, W., Christine, D., Rossi, C., Drexler, N., Basavaraju, S., Annambhotia, P., Vazquez Guillamet, R., Eid, A., Maliakkal, J., Miller, A., Hugge, C., Dharnidharka, V., Kandula, P., and Moritz, M. (2021). Donor-derived Ehrlichiosis: 2 Clusters Following Solid Organ Transplantation. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 74. 10.1093/cid/ciab667.
- Footnote 24
-
Paddock, C. D. and Childs, J. E. (2003). Ehrlichia chaffeensis: a prototypical emerging pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16, 37–64.
- Footnote 25
-
Varela, A. S., Stallknecht, D. E., Tabsley, M. J., Moore, V. A., Davidson, W. R. and Little, S. E. (2003). Experimental infection of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) with Ehrlichia chaffeensis by different inoculation routes. J. Wildl. Dis. 39, 881–886 (2003).
- Footnote 26
-
Nair, A. D., Cheng, C., Jaworski, D. C., Ganta, S., Sanderson, M. W., and Ganta, R. R. (2015). Attenuated Mutants of Ehrlichia chaffeensis Induce Protection against Wild-Type Infection Challenge in the Reservoir Host and in an Incidental Host. Infection and immunity, 83(7), 2827–2835.
- Footnote 27
-
Braga, M. do S. C. de O., André, M. R., Freschi, C. R., Teixeira, M. C. A. and Machado, R. Z. (2012). Molecular and serological detection of Ehrlichia spp. in cats on São Luís Island, Maranhão, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. = Brazilian J. Vet. Parasitol. Orgao Of. do Col. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. 21, 37–41.
- Footnote 28
-
Yabsley MJ. (2010). Natural history of Ehrlichia chaffeensis: vertebrate hosts and tick vectors from the United States and evidence for endemic transmission in other countries. Vet Parasitol. 167(2-4):136-148.
- Footnote 29
-
Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies. (2024). Ehrlichia Species (aabb.org)
- Footnote 30
-
Pflug, I. J., R. G. Holcomb, and M. M. Gomez. 2001. Principles of the thermal destruction of microorganisms, p. 79-129. S. S. Block (ed.), Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation, 5th ed., . Lipincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
- Footnote 31
-
Public Health Agency of Canada. 2024. ePATHogen - Risk Group Database.
- Footnote 32
-
Containment Standards for Facilities Handling Plant Pests, Canadian Food Inspection Agency (Canada)
- Footnote 33
-
Arthropod Containment Guidelines from the American Committee of Medical Entomology; American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (USA)