Murray Valley encephalitis virus: Infectious substances pathogen safety data sheet

Section I - Infectious agent

Name

Murray Valley encephalitis virus

Agent type

Virus

Taxonomy

Family

Flaviviridae

Genus

Orthoflavivirus

Species

murrayenseFootnote 1

Synonym or cross-reference

Causative agent of Murray Valley encephalitis (MVE), formally known as Australian X disease or Australian encephalitisFootnote 2.

Characteristics

Brief description

Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV) is part of the Japanese encephalitis (JE) serological complex and is an enveloped and spherical virus that measures between 40-60 nm in diameter, as other viruses of the family FlaviviridaeFootnote 2Footnote 3Footnote 4. It contains a non-segmented single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome, approximately 9.2-13 kb in lengthFootnote 2Footnote 3Footnote 4Footnote 5Footnote 6Footnote 7Footnote 8Footnote 9Footnote 10. Within the bilayered lipid envelope, the genome is surrounded by an icosahedral nucleocapsidFootnote 4Footnote 6Footnote 9.

Properties

MVEV is a mosquito-borne arbovirus with four recognized genotypes (G1-G4), with G1 being the most prevalentFootnote 2Footnote 11. The genome encodes three structural proteins (capsid protein C, the membrane protein prM, and the envelope protein E) and seven non-structural proteins (NS1, NS2A, NS2B, the helicase/protease NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and the viral RNA polymerase NS5)Footnote 2Footnote 3Footnote 4.

Virion binding and uptake is facilitated via receptor-mediated endocytosisFootnote 10. Once infected, host cells replicate the viral RNA genome and assemble the virion particle by budding through the membranes of the endoplasmic reticulumFootnote 2Footnote 10.

Section II - Hazard identification

Pathogenicity and toxicity

Most cases of human MVEV infection are asymptomatic or present as a mild, non-specific febrile illness usually accompanied by headache, myalgia, and occasionally a rashFootnote 2Footnote 12Footnote 13. Clinically overt disease is estimated to occur in 1 of 150 to 1,000 infectionsFootnote 2Footnote 12Footnote 13.

Lasting usually 2 weeks, clinical disease associated with MVEV infection is characterized by a rapid onset of 2-5 days of fever, headache, myalgia, malaise, anorexia, and nausea before neurological complications occurFootnote 2Footnote 7Footnote 14. Signs of neurological involvement occur within approximately 5 days of onset and include drowsiness, irritability, confusion, speech disturbances, photophobia, numbness, stiff neck, encephalitis, paralysis (including respiratory paralysis), meningismus, and spastic quadriplegia, and seizuresFootnote 2Footnote 6Footnote 7Footnote 9Footnote 14Footnote 15Footnote 16. In severe cases, disease may progress to respiratory failure, coma, and deathFootnote 2. MVE is more severe and common in children, in whom convulsions occur frequently, and Aboriginal populationsFootnote 2Footnote 9. The case fatality rate ranges from 15-32%, whereas long-term neurological sequelae occur in 30-50% of survivors, such as cerebellar and extrapyramidal movement disorders, and cranial palsies, and only 40% recover completelyFootnote 2Footnote 6Footnote 7Footnote 12Footnote 13Footnote 14Footnote 15Footnote 16.

Notably, four clinical patterns of disease have been observed, including relentless progression to death, prominent spinal cord involvement, cranial nerve/brainstem involvement and tremor, and encephalitis with complete recoveryFootnote 2. Overall, cases involving flaccid paralysis with rapid progression to respiratory failure is a predictor of poor neurological outcome and deathFootnote 2.

MVEV infection has additionally been reported in horses, with more severe cases commonly being reportedFootnote 13Footnote 17. The majority of equine cases show clinical symptoms consistent with encephalitis, including both neurological and muscular signsFootnote 17. Viral encephalitis in horses, including MVEV, is characterized by ataxia, depression, altered mental state, muscle fasciculations, hypermetria, hyperaesthesia, circling, recumbency, facial paralysis, weight loss, and pyrexiaFootnote 17. Severe cases may also present with lameness and blindnessFootnote 17.

Epidemiology

MVEV circulates in Australia and Papua New Guinea, and most likely in the Indonesian archipelagoFootnote 2Footnote 12Footnote 13Footnote 14Footnote 15. The virus is endemic in northern Australia and Papua New Guinea and is occasionally epizootic in southeastern and southwestern AustraliaFootnote 2Footnote 11Footnote 15. In Australia, MVEV is endemic in the Kimberley region of Western Australia (WA), the north of the Northern Territory (NT), and in northern QueenslandFootnote 2Footnote 12. G1 is the predominantly circulating genotype in mainland Australia, whereas the G2 genotype is more restricted and consists of mosquito isolates from the Kimberley region of WAFootnote 11Footnote 18. Genotypes G3 and G4 have been identified in Papua New GuineaFootnote 11Footnote 18. MVE usually occurs from February to JuneFootnote 7Footnote 19.

MVEV was suspected to be the causative agent of several large epidemics of encephalitis, designated Australian X disease, in 1917, 1918, 1922, and 1925 on the east coast of Australia, which ranged from 21 to 114 casesFootnote 2Footnote 13. In 1951, a confirmed epidemic of MVEV occurred in southeastern Australia and resulted in 45 cases; however, all but two cases originated from the Murray ValleyFootnote 2Footnote 13. Another outbreak occurred in Australia in 1974, comprising 58 cases, including 13 deathsFootnote 13Footnote 14. The last major outbreak occurred in Australia in 2011 and resulted in 17 confirmed cases, including 3 deaths, one of which was acquired in Australia but became symptomatic in CanadaFootnote 13Footnote 20.

Predisposing factors for MVEV infection are situational, including geographical location, occupational, and human behaviourFootnote 13Footnote 21. Human behaviours that could result in an increased risk for infection include being outdoors, especially in a generally wet environment, such as going fishing or campingFootnote 13. On the other hand, in occupational settings, an increased risk of infection could be a result of working with organisms, specifically mosquitos, infected with MVEVFootnote 22.

Host range

Natural host(s)

Waterfowl of the order Ciconiiformes, particularly the Nankeen (or rufous) night heron (Nycticorax caledonicus), and other herons and egrets are primary (definitive) hostsFootnote 2Footnote 11Footnote 13. Mosquitoes are secondary (intermediate) hostsFootnote 2Footnote 7. Dead-end hosts include humans, horses, cattle, feral pigs, chickens, rabbits, canids (dogs and dingoes), rats, camels, and western grey kangaroosFootnote 2Footnote 12Footnote 13Footnote 23.

Other host(s)

Experimentally infected hosts include hamsters and miceFootnote 2Footnote 24Footnote 25.

Infectious dose

The infectious dose for humans is unknown. However, in experimental settings, a mean 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) of 5.74 ± 0.24 log IU/mL was determined for MVEV following titration on Vero cells and incubation for 5daysFootnote 26.

Incubation period

The incubation period is between 5 and 28 daysFootnote 3Footnote 14.

Communicability

In both human and animals, the preferred mode of transmission is by injection via the bite of a mosquito that has been infected by feeding on MVEV-infected waterfowlFootnote 7Footnote 8Footnote 27. In experimental settings, inoculation by the oral, subcutaneous, and intranasal routes has been shown to induce infection and/or disease in animal models, suggesting that ingestion, contact with mucous membranes or damaged skin, and inhalation are possible routes of transmission in humansFootnote 28Footnote 29.

Direct or indirect human-to-human transmission is unlikely as humans are considered dead-end hosts, although there is evidence that orthoflaviviruses can be transmitted verticallyFootnote 6Footnote 21Footnote 22Footnote 30Footnote 31. Indirect animal-to-animal transmission occurs between waterfowl as MVEV is maintained in a transmission cycle involving mosquito vectors and waterfowl amplifying hostsFootnote 11Footnote 15.

Section III - Dissemination

Reservoir

Waterfowl of the order Ciconiiformes, particularly the Nankeen (or rufous) night heron (Nycticorax caledonicus), and other herons and egrets are the main reservoir hosts of MVEV; however, cattle, horses, and feral pigs may also act as reservoirsFootnote 2Footnote 7Footnote 9Footnote 12Footnote 14Footnote 21.

Zoonosis

MVEV is transmitted from infected animals (particularly waterfowl) to humans via indirect zoonosis, specifically via MVEV-infected mosquitoesFootnote 2Footnote 3Footnote 12. Humans are considered dead-end hosts for MVEV; as such, reverse zoonosis or zooanthroponosis is unlikely to occurFootnote 2Footnote 21.

Vectors

Culex mosquitoes, particularly Culex annulirostris, are the main vectors, although Aedes mosquitoes, particularly Aedes normanensis, are also believed to play a role in MVEV transmissionFootnote 2Footnote 7Footnote 12Footnote 19.

It is important to note that vertical transmission between arthropod vectors and their offsprings is possible for orthoflaviviruses and has been reported for Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV)Footnote 22Footnote 27.

Section IV - Stability and viability

Drug susceptibility/resistance

None knownFootnote 2Footnote 16.

Susceptibility to disinfectants

MVEV is rapidly inactivated by common laboratory disinfectants, including 70% ethanol, 1% sodium hypochlorite, 2% glutaraldehyde, and quaternary ammonium compoundsFootnote 32. In addition, similar to all lipid-enveloped viruses, MVEV is likely susceptible to phenolics, iodophors, formaldehyde (paraformaldehyde and formalin), and peracetic acidFootnote 33.

Physical inactivation

The thermal inactivation point of orthoflaviviruses, including MVEV, is 40°C, and virus present in serum or culture media can be inactivated by heating at 56°C for 30 minutesFootnote 34. Additionally, a study involving arboviruses, including MVEV, showed an approximate 98% reduction in arboviral infectivity in buffy coat-derived platelets using the Mirasol pathogen reduction technology (PRT) system, which is a UV light procedureFootnote 26.

Survival outside host

Unknown.

Section V - First aid/medical

Surveillance

As most cases present as asymptomatic or mild, monitor for worsening or new symptoms to provide proper clinical care if requiredFootnote 2. MVEV infection can be confirmed by detection of MVEV, MVEV RNA, or MVEV-specific IgM by reverse transcriptase followed by PCR (RT-PCR), the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), or microsphere immunoassaysFootnote 2Footnote 6Footnote 7Footnote 16.

Note: The specific recommendations for surveillance in the laboratory should come from the medical surveillance program, which is based on a local risk assessment of the pathogens and activities being undertaken, as well as an overarching risk assessment of the biosafety program as a whole. More information on medical surveillance is available in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.

First aid/treatment

No specific treatment is available; however, intensive supportive care may be required to treat symptomsFootnote 2Footnote 7Footnote 9Footnote 16.

Note: The specific recommendations for first aid/treatment in the laboratory should come from the post-exposure response plan, which is developed as part of the medical surveillance program. More information on the post-exposure response plan can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.

Immunization

There is no vaccine currently available for MVEVFootnote 2Footnote 7Footnote 9. However, there is mixed evidence of cross-protection from the JE vaccine as both JEV and MVEV are part of the JE serocomplexFootnote 2Footnote 3Footnote 21. In experimental settings, the JE vaccine induced cross-protective immunity in animal models, although a study using mice showed that vaccination enhanced MVE and caused a more severe clinical courseFootnote 2Footnote 3Footnote 21.

Note: More information on the medical surveillance program can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook, and by consulting the Canadian Immunization Guide.

Prophylaxis

No known post-exposure prophylaxis.

Note: More information on prophylaxis as part of the medical surveillance program can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.

Section VI - Laboratory hazard

Laboratory-acquired infections

No reported cases of laboratory-acquired infection with MVEV.

Note: Please consult the Canadian Biosafety Standard and Canadian Biosafety Handbook for additional details on requirements for reporting exposure incidents.

Sources/specimens

MVEV can be found in blood (plasma and serum), urine, and cerebrospinal fluidFootnote 15Footnote 16.

Primary hazards

Autoinoculation with infectious material is the primary hazard associated with exposure to MVEVFootnote 7Footnote 31.

Special hazards

Work with experimentally infected mosquitoes may present a special hazard.

Section VII - Exposure controls/personal protection

Risk group classification

MVEV is a Risk Group 3 Human Pathogen and Risk Group 3 Animal Pathogen, and is a Security Sensitive Biological Agent (SSBA)Footnote 35Footnote 36.

Containment requirements

Containment Level 3 facilities, equipment, and operational practices outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard for work involving infectious or potentially infectious materials, animals, or cultures.

Protective clothing

The applicable Containment Level 3 requirements for personal protective equipment and clothing outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard are to be followed. At minimum, use of full body coverage dedicated protective clothing, dedicated protective footwear and/or additional protective footwear, gloves when handling infectious materials or animals, face protection when there is a known or potential risk of exposure to splashes or flying objects, respirators when there is a risk of exposure to infectious aerosols, and an additional layer of protective clothing prior to work with infectious materials or animals.

Note: A local risk assessment will identify the appropriate hand, foot, head, body, eye/face, and respiratory protection, and the personal protective equipment requirements for the containment zone must be documented.

Other precautions

All activities involving open vessels of pathogens are to be performed in a certified biological safety cabinet (BSC) or other appropriate primary containment device. The use of needles, syringes, and other sharp objects are to be strictly limited. Additional precautions must be considered with work involving animals or large scale activities.

Proper precautions should be considered when working with infected arthropods. This might include implementing a program to prevent escapes and monitor any escaped arthropods, as well as using suitable personal protective equipment (PPE), among other measures.

Section VIII - Handling and storage

Spills

Allow aerosols to settle. Wearing personal protective equipment, gently cover the spill with absorbent paper towel and apply suitable disinfectant, starting at the perimeter and working towards the centre. Allow sufficient contact time with the disinfectant before clean up (Canadian Biosafety Handbook).

Disposal

Regulated materials, as well as all items and waste to be decontaminated at the containment barrier prior to removal from the containment zone, animal room, animal cubicle, or post mortem room. This can be achieved by using decontamination technologies and processes that have been demonstrated to be effective against the infectious material, such as chemical disinfectants, autoclaving, irradiation, incineration, an effluent treatment system, or gaseous decontamination (Canadian Biosafety Handbook).

Storage

The applicable Containment Level 3 requirements for storage outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard are to be followed. Primary containers of regulated materials removed from the containment zone to be stored in a labelled, leak-proof, impact-resistant secondary container, and kept either in locked storage equipment or within an area with limited access.

Containers of security sensitive biological agents (SSBA) stored outside the containment zone must be labelled, leakproof, impact resistant, and kept in locked storage equipment that is fixed in place (i.e., non-movable) and within an area with limited access.

An inventory of RG3 and SSBA toxins in long-term storage, to be maintained and to include:

  • specific identification of the regulated materials
  • a mechanism that allows for the detection of a missing or stolen sample in a timely manner

Section IX - Regulatory and other information

Canadian regulatory information

Controlled activities with MVEV require a Pathogen and Toxin licence issued by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). MVEV is a terrestrial animal pathogen; therefore, importation of MVEV requires an import permit under the authority of the Health of Animals Regulations (HAR), issued by the PHAC. The PHAC issues a Pathogen and Toxin Licence, which includes an HAR importation permit.

Note that there are additional security requirements, such as obtaining a Human Pathogens and Toxins Act Security Clearance, for work involving SSBAs.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of applicable designations, regulations, or legislations:

Last file update

June 2024

Prepared by

Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada.

Disclaimer

The scientific information, opinions, and recommendations contained in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet have been developed based on or compiled from trusted sources available at the time of publication. Newly discovered hazards are frequent and this information may not be completely up to date. The Government of Canada accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, sufficiency, or reliability or for any loss or injury resulting from the use of the information.

Persons in Canada are responsible for complying with the relevant laws, including regulations, guidelines and standards applicable to the import, transport, and use of pathogens in Canada set by relevant regulatory authorities, including the Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment and Climate Change Canada, and Transport Canada. The risk classification and related regulatory requirements referenced in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet, such as those found in the Canadian Biosafety Standard, may be incomplete and are specific to the Canadian context. Other jurisdictions will have their own requirements.

Copyright © Public Health Agency of Canada, 2024, Canada

References

Footnote 1

International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2023. Orthoflavivirus murrayense Taxon Details | ICTV. Available at https://ictv.global/taxonomy/taxondetails?taxnode_id=202303100&taxon_name=Orthoflavivirus%20murrayense [Accessed on June 13, 2024]

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Prow, N. A., R. A. Hall, and M. Lobigs. 2013. Murray Valley Encephalitis Virus, p 26, Neuroviral Infections : RNA Viruses and Retroviruses, 1ed.

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Schweitzer, B. K., N. M. Chapman, and P. Iwen. 2009. Overview of the Flaviviridae With an Emphasis on the Japanese Encephalitis Group Viruses. Labmedicine 40:493-499.

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Footnote 4

Hurrelbrink R. J., A. Nestorowicz, and P. C. McMinn.1999. Characterization of infectious Murray Valley encephalitis virus derived from a stably cloned genome-length cDNA. Journal of General Virology 80:3115-3125.

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Footnote 5

Simmonds P., P. Becher, J. Bukh, E. A. Gould, G. Meyers, T. Monath, S. Muerhoff, A. Pletnev, R. Rico-Hesse, D. B. Smith, J. T. Stapleton, and I. R. Consortium. 2017. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Flaviviridae. Journal of General Virology 98:2-3.

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Footnote 6

Lanciotti, R. S., and T. F. Tsai. 2007. Arboviruses, p 1486-1498. Murray, P. R., E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. L. Landry, and M. A. Pfaller (Eds.). Manual of Clinical Microbiology (9th ed.). Washington: ASM Press

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Footnote 7

Aaskov, J. G., and R. L. Doherty. 1994. Arboviral Zoonoses of Australasia, p 289-292. Beran G.W. (Ed.). Handbook of Zoonoses, Section B: Viral Zoonoses (2nd ed.). CRC Press

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Footnote 8

Paragas, J., and T. P. Endy. 2006. Viral Agents of Human Disease: Biosafety Concerns, p 189. Fleming, D., and D. Hunt (Ed.). Biological Safety Principles and Practices (4 th ed.). Washington: ASM Press.

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Footnote 9

Russell, R. C., and D. E. Dwyer. 2000. Arboviruses associated with human disease in Australia. Microbes and Infection / Institut Pasteur, 2(14), 1693-1704.

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

Lindenbach, B. D., G. Randall, R. Bartenschlager, and C. M. Rice. 2020. Flaviviridae: The Viruses and Their Replication, p 246-301. Howley, P. M., D. M. Knipe, and S. Whelan (Eds.). Fields Virology: Emerging Viruses (7 th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

Williams, D. T., S. M. Diviney, K. J. Corscadden, B. H. Chua, and J. S. Mackenzie. 2014. Complete genome sequences of the prototype isolates of genotypes 2, 3, and 4 of murray valley encephalitis virus. Genome Announcements 2.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

Mackenzie, J. S., M. D. A. Lindsay, D. W. Smith, and A. Imrie. 2017. The ecology and epidemiology of Ross River and Murray Valley encephalitis viruses in Western Australia: examples of One Health in Action. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 111:248-254.

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

Selvey, L. A., L. Dailey, M. Lindsay, P. Armstrong, S. Tobin, A. P. Koehler, P. G. Markely, and D. W. Smith. 2014. The Changing Epidemiology of Murray Valley Encephalitis in Australia: The 2011 Outbreak and a Review of the Literature. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8:e2656.

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Footnote 14

Barboza, P., A. Tarantola, L. Lassel, T. Mollet, I. Quatresous, and C. Paquet. 2008. Viroses émergentes en Asie du Sud-Est et dans le Pacifique. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses 38:513-523.

Return to footnote 14 referrer

Footnote 15

Knox, J. R. U. Cowan, J. S. Doyle, M. K. Ligtermoet, J. S. Archer, J. N. C. Burrow, S. Y. C. Yong, B. J. Currie, J. S. Mackenzie, D. W. Smith, M. Catton, R. J. Moran, C. A. Aboltins, and J. S. Richards. 2012. Murray Valley Enephalitis: A review of clinical features, diagnosis and treatment. The Medical Journal of Australia 196:1-5.

Return to footnote 15 referrer

Footnote 16

McCormack, J. G., and A. M. Allworth. 2002. Emerging viral infections in Australia. The Medical Journal of Australia, 177(1), 45-49.

Return to footnote 16 referrer

Footnote 17

Roche, S., R. Wicks, M. Garner, I. East, R. Paskin, B. Moloney, M. Carr, and P. Kirkland. 2013. Descriptive overview of the 2011 epidemic of arboviral disease in horses in Australia. Australian Veterinary Journal 91:5-13.

Return to footnote 17 referrer

Footnote 18

Knare, B., and R. J. Kuhn. 2022. The Japanese Encephalitis Antigenic Complex Viruses: From Structure to Immunity. Viruses 14:2213.

Return to footnote 18 referrer

Footnote 19

Floridis, J., S. L. McGuiness, N. Kurucz, J. N. Burrow, R. Baird, and J. R. Francis. 2018. Murray Valley Encephalitis Virus: An Ongoing Cause of Encephalitis in Australia's North. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 3:49.

Return to footnote 19 referrer

Footnote 20

Niven, D. J., K. Afra, M. Iftinca. R. Tellier, K. Fonseca, A. Kramer, D. Safronetz, K. Holloway, M. Drebot, and A. S. Johnson. 2017. Fatal Infection with Murray Valley Encephalitis Virus Imported from Australia to Canada, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis 23:280-283.

Return to footnote 20 referrer

Footnote 21

Braddick, M., H. M. O'Brien, C. K. Lim, R. Feldman, C. Bunter, P. Neville, C. R. Bailie, G. Butel-Simoes, M. H. Jung, A. Yuen, N. Hughes, and N. D. Friedman. 2023. An integrated public health response to an outbreak of Murray Valley encephalitis virus infection during the 2022-2023 mosquito season in Victoria. Front Public Health 11:1256149.

Return to footnote 21 referrer

Footnote 22

Lequime, S., R. e. Paul, and L. Lambrechts. 2016. Determinants of Arbovirus Vertical Transmission in Mosquitoes. PLOS Pathogens 12:e1005548.

Return to footnote 22 referrer

Footnote 23

Doherty, R. 1977. ARTHROPOD-BORNE VIRUSES IN AUSTRALIA, 1973-1976. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 55:103-130.

Return to footnote 23 referrer

Footnote 24

May, F. J, M. Lobigs, E. Lee, D. J. Gendle, J. S. Mackenzie, A. K. Broom, J. V. Conlan, and R. A. Hall. 2006. Biological, antigenic and phylogenetic characterization of the flavivirus Alfuy. Journal of General Virology 87:329-337.

Return to footnote 24 referrer

Footnote 25

Imam, I. Z. E., and W. M. Hammon. 1957. Challenge of Hamsters with Japanese B, St. Louis and Murray Valley Encephalitis Viruses after Immunization by West Nile Infection Plus Specific Vaccine1. The Journal of Immunology 79:243-252.

Return to footnote 25 referrer

Footnote 26

Faddy, H. M., N. A. Prow, J. J. Fryk, R. A. Hall, S. D. Keil, R. P. Goodrich, and D.C. Marks. 2015. The effect of riboflavin and ultraviolet light on the infectivity of arboviruses. Transfusion 55:824-831.

Return to footnote 26 referrer

Footnote 27

International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2024. Genus: Orthoflavivirus | ICTV. Available at https://ictv.global/report/chapter/flaviviridae/flaviviridae/orthoflavivirus [Accessed June 18]

Return to footnote 27 referrer

Footnote 28

McLean, D. M. 1953. The behaviour of Murray Valley encephalitis virus in young chickens. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 31:491-503.

Return to footnote 28 referrer

Footnote 29

French, E. l. 1952. Murray Valley encephalitis isolation and characterization of the aetiological agent. Med J Aust 1:100-3.

Return to footnote 29 referrer

Footnote 30

Chen, L. H., and M. E. Wilson. 2005. Non-Vector Transmission of Dengue and Other Mosquito-Borne Flaviviruses.

Return to footnote 30 referrer

Footnote 31

Winkler, W. G., and D. C. Blenden. 1995. Transmission and Control of Viral Zoonoses in the Laboratory, p 114-115. Fleming D. O., J. H. Richardson, J. J. Tulis, and D. Vesley. (Eds.). Laboratory Safety Principles and Practices (2nd ed.). Washington: American Society for Microbiology.

Return to footnote 31 referrer

Footnote 32

Katz L. M., R. Y. Dodd, P. Saa, J. B. Gorlin, K. Palmer, F. B. Hollinger, and S. L. Stramer. 2024. Viral Agents (2nd section) Transfusion, 64:S19-S207.

Return to footnote 32 referrer

Footnote 33

Collins, C. H., and D. A. Kennedy (Eds.). 1983. Laboratory-acquired Infections (4th ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinermann.

Return to footnote 33 referrer

Footnote 34

Williams, D. T., J. S Mackenzie, and J. S. Bingham. 2019. Flaviviruses, p. 530-543. J. J. Zimmerman, L. A. Karriker, A. Ramirez, K. J. Schwartz, G. W. Stevenson, and J. Zhang (eds.), Diseases of Swine, 11th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Return to footnote 34 referrer

Footnote 35

Human Pathogens and Toxins Act. S.C. 2009, c. 24, Second Session, Fortieth Parliament, 57-58 Elizabeth II, 2009. (2009)

Return to footnote 35 referrer

Footnote 36

Public Health Agency of Canada. 2024. ePATHogen Risk Group Database. Available at https://health.canada.ca/en/epathogen [Accessed on June 18, 2024]

Return to footnote 36 referrer

Page details

Date modified: