Hepatitis C in Canada and the importance of risk-based screening - CCDR: Volume 42-3, March 3, 2016: Infectious Disease as Chronic Disease

ISSN 1481-8531
(On-line) ccdr canada communicable disease report

Overviews

Hepatitis C in Canada and the importance of risk-based screening

Ha SAuthor Footnote 1, Totten SAuthor Footnote 1, Pogany LAuthor Footnote 1, Wu JAuthor Footnote 1, Gale-Rowe MAuthor Footnote 1

Affiliations:

Author Footnote 1

Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON

Return to author footnote 1 referrer

Author Footnote *

Correspondenceshalane.ha@phac-aspc.gc.ca

Return to author footnote * referrer

Abstract

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) remains a public health issue affecting an estimated 220,000 individuals in Canada. In 2011, approximately 44% of those with CHC were unaware of their infection. Hepatitis C is infectious in origin, and if left untreated, can lead to significant morbidity and mortality in its chronic form, including liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure. These health outcomes are associated with comorbidities, adding a burden to the Canadian health care system. Recent advancements in the treatment of hepatitis C have changed the clinical landscape.

In Canada, the prevalence of incident cases is higher in specific population groups. Injection drug use (IDU) currently accounts for the highest proportion of new hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. It is unclear to what extent HCV infection through health care or personal services use contributed to current prevalent cases of CHC. The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC) is currently reviewing the evidence for different approaches to HCV screening and the benefits and harms of screening. Risk-based screening remains critical to detecting hepatitis C as knowing one’s status has been linked to the cascade of care and improved population health outcomes. This article intends to highlight risk factors associated with the acquisition of HCV so that health care providers can screen, where appropriate, and detect CHC.

Suggested citation: Ha S, Totten S, Pogany L, Wu J, Gale-Rowe M. Hepatitis C in Canada and the importance of risk-based screening. Can Comm Dis Rep 2016;42:57-62.

Introduction

Hepatitis C, an inflammation of the liver caused by the hepatitis C virus (HCV), is infectious in origin and can lead to chronic disease with the added dimension of transmission. Hepatitis C is often asymptomatic for decades until liver damage is already underway, highlighting the importance of early detection.

The primary route of transmission is through blood-to-blood contact with an infected individual or product. HCV can cause acute and chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Approximately 25% of individuals with acute hepatitis C will spontaneously clear the virus Footnote 1; the remaining 75% develop CHC, which may progress to cirrhosis, liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma Footnote 2.

Of the seven HCV genotypes known worldwide Footnote 3, genotype 1 is the most common in Canada Footnote 4 and, until recently, has been difficult to treat. Approvals of new pharmaceuticals for the management of CHC in Canada have the potential to make CHC a curable infectious disease.

In Canada, 346 deaths were attributed to CHC in 2011 Footnote 5; however, the number of hepatitis C-related deaths is likely considerably underestimated due to misclassification on death certificates Footnote 6. Data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Registry indicate that 21% of patients who received liver transplants from 2004 to 2013 in Canada had a primary diagnosis of HCV Footnote 7. In a 2010 Ontario study, HCV was ranked as one of the most burdensome infectious pathogens in terms of years of life lost due to premature mortality, year-equivalents of reduced functioning, and health-adjusted life years Footnote 8, underscoring the impact of this infection on the health of Canadians.

In 2012 and 2013, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released updated guidelines on HCV screening, recommending that all adults born between 1945 and 1965 (also known as “baby boomers”) should receive baseline screening for HCV regardless of their risk factors Footnote 9,Footnote 10. The US recommendations to undertake one-time testing of baby boomers were based on epidemiological data demonstrating 1) a high prevalence of HCV in the baby boomer birth cohort; 2) a high proportion of patients with undiagnosed infection; 3) a projected increase in the burden of disease; and 4) indirect evidence linking screening with improved health outcomes Footnote 9,Footnote 10.

Following the release of the US recommendations, the Public Health Agency of Canada examined the projected burden related to hepatitis C Footnote 11 and modelled prevalence estimates for anti-HCV and CHC Footnote 12. Given the uncertainty around the estimates and the benefits and harms of screening, further analysis was required to determine whether changes should be made to Canada’s current risk-based screening recommendations. These areas will be addressed by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC). CTFPHC is conducting a review of Canadian data to determine the applicability of different screening approaches, including birth cohort screening, in Canada.

The objectives of this article are to highlight the risk factors that contribute to transmitting and acquiring HCV and to encourage health care providers to assess the need for HCV screening as part of routine medical care while we wait for the results of the assessment of the evidence for birth cohort screening in Canada.

Pharmaceutical management

The goal of hepatitis C therapy is to achieve a sustained virological response (SVR), defined as having an undetectable viral load in the blood following treatment. Until recently, treatment for hepatitis C consisted of injections of pegylated interferon-alfa and ribavirin, which resulted in <60% SVR Footnote 13. In addition, the therapies lasted a long time (up to 48 weeks), involved injections and had significant adverse effects (e.g. anemia, fever), which limited the efficacy and tolerability among patients Footnote 13,Footnote 14.

In December 2014, Health Canada approved new short-course interferon-free treatments Footnote 15. Genotype 1 patients treated with these new regimens can achieve a SVR of >90%, with fewer side effects Footnote 14,Footnote 16,Footnote 17. These new treatments present an opportunity to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with hepatitis C and the burden on the health care system. The introduction of the new therapies has shifted the focus from living well with hepatitis C to potentially curing hepatitis C.

Epidemiology

In Canada, HCV has been a notifiable infection under national surveillance since 1991. Provincial and territorial health authorities report cases of HCV infection to the Canadian Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (CNDSS). The latest surveillance data indicate that between 2005 and 2012 the rate of reported cases of HCV decreased steadily from 40.4 per 100,000 to 29.3 per 100,000 population. Rates declined among both males and females in all age groups, with the exception of small increases in males aged 60 years and older and females aged 25 to 29 years. Over the eight-year time frame, rates of reported cases of HCV were consistently higher in males than in females Footnote 18. Although information on acute or CHC status was not available from most provinces and territories, CHC infection probably makes up the majority of cases reported to the CNDSS, as acute infection is usually asymptomatic and less likely to be diagnosed Footnote 18.

An analysis of cohort effects among cases of HCV reported between 1991 and 2010 in Canada found that those born between 1946 and 1965 contributed more than half of all cases Footnote 19. While the rate of reported cases in Canada appears to be decreasing, the number of individuals infected decades ago and now developing sequelae is expected to increase as their disease progresses Footnote 20.

Population-based studies of the prevalence of HCV infection provide additional information on the extent of this disease. The Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) found the seroprevalence of HCV antibody (anti-HCV), a marker of lifetime exposure to the virus, to be 0.5% of the household-dwelling population in Canada over a period of data collection spanning 2007 to 2011 Footnote 21. However, modelled prevalence estimates, taking into account vulnerable populations not surveyed by the CHMS, such as the homeless, prison inmates and foreign-born populations who do not speak English or French, indicate that the rate of anti-HCV in the Canadian population may be closer to 1% (plausibility range, 0.6%–1.3%) Footnote 12. The prevalence of CHC was estimated to be 0.6%, with approximately 44% of those being unaware of their infection Footnote 12.

Risk factors

Risk factor information available through national surveillance of HCV is limited; however, there is a considerable research on the conditions that influence the likelihood of becoming infected with the virus. An overview of practices that increase the risk of acquiring HCV, as well as populations that have been reported to have higher than average rates of HCV infection, is presented below.

Injection drug use

Injection drug use (IDU) continues to be the primary cause for incident cases of HCV in developed countries Footnote 19. In Canada, among newly acquired HCV cases with known risk factor information, 61% had reported a history of IDU Footnote 22. In addition, a 2010–2012 survey of people who injected drugs found that 68% of those surveyed had evidence of exposure to HCV in their lifetime Footnote 23. The high prevalence of HCV infection among injection drug users coupled with the high infectivity of HCV make preventing HCV transmission challenging Footnote 24,Footnote 25. IDU or sharing needles or other drug use equipment (i.e. filters, syringes, pipes, spoons), even once, increases the risk of acquiring or transmitting hepatitis C.

Contaminated medical, dental or personal services equipment

Lack of implementation of standard infection prevention and control practices in health care (e.g. in hospitals, dental offices) or personal service (e.g. tattoo parlours and nail salons) is another risk for HCV infection Footnote 26,Footnote 27,Footnote 28,Footnote 29,Footnote 30. For instance, patients undergoing hemodialysis are at increased risk of acquiring HCV, especially if the equipment has been reused or improperly sterilized Footnote 26. In addition, a recent systematic review of international publications reported that health care workers in direct contact with patients or blood (from needle stick injuries) are 1.6 times more likely to be infected with HCV than the general population. Increased prevalence of HCV was found among medical staff (OR 2.2), laboratory staff (OR 2.2) and dental staff (OR 3.5) compared to controls Footnote 27. HCV outbreaks have also occurred in colonoscopy clinics in Canada Footnote 31,Footnote 32,Footnote 33,Footnote 34,Footnote 35.

Unsafe tattooing practices using non-sterile equipment increase the risk of acquiring HCV Footnote 28. Results from a systematic review indicate that risk of HCV increases with increase in the surface area covered by tattoos as well as the number of tattoos Footnote 28.

The key to reducing the risk of transmitting infectious diseases in health care and personal service settings is to ensure appropriate education and, training of personnel to be compliant with infection prevention and control practices Footnote 29,Footnote 30.

Blood, blood products and organ transplantation before 1992

Prior to implementing routine screening of donated blood, blood products and organs in 1992, transfusion and transplantation procedures represented a significant risk for HCV transmission. These risks have been minimized in Canada through routine screening and disposal of donations that contain a transmissible disease; however, this is not the case for all countries. Canadian Blood Services data from 2014 indicate that HCV was detected in 6.1 per 100,000 donations; the residual risk of becoming infected with HCV through receipt of a unit of blood is estimated to be very low at 1 in 6.7 million donations Footnote 36.

Vertical transmission

Mother-to-child or vertical transmission of HCV may occur when an infant is born to a woman with HCV infection. Results from a recent meta-analysis suggest that the risk of vertical transmission from anti-HCV positive and RNA‑positive women is about 5.8% (95% CI, 4.2%–7.8%), and the risk to children born to an anti-HCV positive mother with spontaneous clearance of infection (RNA negative) was insignificant Footnote 37,Footnote 38.

Other activities that may result in contact with contaminated blood

Sharing personal care items such as razors, toothbrushes or nail clippers with someone who is HCV-positive is a risk, of a less common one, for acquiring hepatitis C because HCV can remain infectious on inanimate surfaces for up to 6 weeks Footnote 24.

Though risk for sexual transmission of HCV during intercourse is low Footnote 39, engaging in risky sexual behaviour, such as anal sex without a condom, could result in HCV transmission Footnote 40,Footnote 41,Footnote 42 if the mucosa breaks, leading to blood‑to‑blood contact.

Populations with a higher prevalence of HCV infection
Men who have sex with men

Some studies have demonstrated higher rates of HCV infection among HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) compared to HIV-negative MSM Footnote 43,Footnote 44. Some HIV-positive MSM may be more likely to engage in practices that increase the risk of HCV transmission. These practices may include high-risk sexual behaviour (e.g. unprotected anal intercourse or fisting, which may lead to bleeding); IDU and the use of recreational drugs that have been linked to high-risk sexual activity; and serosorting (i.e. choosing sexual partners with the same HIV status as one’s own), which has also been linked to transmission of sexually transmitted and bloodborne infections among HIV-positive MSM. In addition, the HIV infection itself, as well as co-infection with other sexually transmitted infections (e.g. syphilis, gonorrhea or chlamydia), may increase susceptibility to HCV through ulceration of genital mucosa or suppression of the immune system Footnote 41,Footnote 42,Footnote 43,Footnote 45,Footnote 46,Footnote 47.

Incarcerated populations

High rates of HCV infection have been found among inmates of federal and provincial penitentiaries through routinely offered screening. Although not all inmates accept HCV screening, those identified with CHC are offered treatment depending on their stage in liver fibrosis Footnote 48. Recent surveillance data from Correctional Services Canada indicate that 86.1% of federal penitentiary inmates accepted HCV screening on admission and 18.5% were positive for HCV in 2012 Footnote 49. Risk factors for HCV acquisition among inmates include contact with infected blood through fights, sexual exposure, IDU or unsafe tattooing practices (50 and unpublished data Correctional Services Canada 2015).

Aboriginal Peoples

Aboriginal Peoples appear to be disproportionately affected by HCV infection: a pilot survey of Aboriginal people in Regina, Saskatchewan, conducted from 2011-2012 found that 42% of participants had evidence of exposure to HCV in their lifetime Footnote 51,Footnote 52,Footnote 53. As with non-Aboriginal Canadians, IDU is the primary risk factor; additional social determinants that may make Aboriginal people vulnerable to HCV infection include poverty, inadequate housing and lack of access to health care services Footnote 51.

Immigrants from countries with high HCV prevalence

Certain countries have a higher-than-average prevalence of HCV (greater than 3%); people who were born or resided for a significant period of time in such regions may be at increased risk of HCV infection, particularly in those regions where infection prevention and control measures in health care or personal service settings are not routinely implemented Footnote 54. Regions where hepatitis C is more common include Central, East and South Asia; Australasia and Oceania; Eastern Europe; Sub-Saharan Africa; and North Africa/Middle East Footnote 4,Footnote 55.

Screening

Screening is a viable public health intervention when the following criteria are met: the condition being screened for should be an important health problem; the natural history should be well understood; there should be a detectable early stage; a suitable test should be available for the early stages; treatment at an early stage should be more beneficial than at a later stage; the availability of a diagnostic test should be accepted; intervals for repeat testing should be determined; adequate health service provisions should be available; the benefits should outweigh the harms; effective treatment should be available and accessible; and lastly, the cost should be balanced against the benefits Footnote 56.

Screening for CHC may provide both public health and personal health benefits by interrupting viral transmission (public benefit) and reducing morbidity and mortality (personal benefit). Achieving SVR is associated with a reduced risk of hepatic events and with patients living healthier lives Footnote 57. In addition, early diagnosis enables counselling to reduce alcohol consumption, which can slow the progression of liver disease Footnote 58.

The public health benefit of identifying undiagnosed cases through risk-based screening is to prevent the acquisition and transmission of HCV in incident cases. A case is being made for birth cohort screening identifying individuals with CHC who might otherwise remain undiagnosed. The CTFPHC’s assessment will shed light on the applicability of birth cohort screening in Canada. Health care practitioners are encouraged to assess the need for HCV screening as part of routine care.

Risk-based screening for hepatitis C

Current screening recommendations for hepatitis C in Canada are based on the assessment of risk factors Footnote 59. Risks associated with the acquisition of HCV include activities that involve any risk of exposure to contaminated blood or products including:

  • IDU or sharing contaminated drug equipment, even once
  • Receipt of health care or personal services, where there is a lack of infection prevention and control practices
  • Receipt of a blood transfusion, blood products or organ transplant before 1992 in Canada
  • Birth or residence in a region where hepatitis C is more common (prevalence >3%), including Central, East and South Asia; Australasia and Oceania; Eastern Europe; Sub-Saharan Africa; and North Africa/Middle East
  • Other Risks:
    • Sharing personal care items with someone who is HCV-positive
    • Participating in risky sexual activity
    • Being born to a mother who is HCV-positive

Conclusion

Hepatitis C is a complex disease in that it is infectious, can remain asymptomatic for decades, can present as a chronic illness and is associated with other chronic comorbidities. The presence of comorbidities may have implications for the diagnosis, management and treatment success of CHC. With the availability of new effective treatment for hepatitis C, screening for hepatitis C is important for early detection and to improve population health and patient outcomes. Familiarity with the risk factors for the acquisition of HCV and identifying individuals who are at risk are important to reduce the morbidity and mortality related to hepatitis C and prevent onwards transmission.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Report a problem or mistake on this page
Please select all that apply:

Privacy statement

Thank you for your help!

You will not receive a reply. For enquiries, contact us.

Date modified: