Original mixed methods research – Development of a prenatal program for adults with personal histories of childhood abuse or neglect: a Delphi consensus consultation study
This article has been peer reviewed.
Correspondence: Nicolas Berthelot, Département des sciences infirmières, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QC G9A 5H7; Tel: 819-376-5011 ext. 3487; Email: email@example.com
Introduction: Pregnancy and the birth of a child present particular challenges for adults with personal histories of childhood abuse or neglect. However, few prenatal interventions address the specific needs of this population. This research aims to determine a list of actions that should be achieved during group interventions designed for expectant parents who experienced childhood trauma.
Methods: Fifteen stakeholders representing nine different Quebec health care and community organizations that work with families and/or trauma survivors participated in a Delphi process in two rounds. In round 1, three project leaders identified, from clinical and empirical literature, a set of 36 actions relevant for expectant parents who experienced childhood trauma. Using an anonymized online survey, stakeholders coded how important they considered each action and whether they were already conducting similar interventions in their clinical setting. Stakeholders subsequently participated in a one-day in-person meeting during which they discussed the pertinence of each action, proposed new ones and refined them. This was followed by a second anonymized online survey (round 2). A consensus was reached among the stakeholders regarding a final list of 22 actions.
Results: Two central clusters of actions emerged from the consultation process: actions aiming to support mentalization about self and parenthood, and actions aiming to support mentalization of trauma.
Conclusion: The Delphi process helped to identify what should be the core of a prenatal intervention targeting adults who experienced childhood trauma, from the viewpoint of professionals who will ultimately deliver such a program.
Keywords: adult survivors of child adverse events; child maltreatment; parenting; intervention; mentalization; Delphi process
- Childhood abuse or neglect have long-term impacts that persist throughout adulthood and negatively affect the transition to parenthood.
- Few interventions are designed for the numerous adults with histories of childhood abuse and neglect who are expecting.
- Such interventions are of great importance for public health because they could promote the physical and mental health of adults with personal histories of childhood trauma, promote the psychosocial development of their child, and interrupt intergenerational cycles of abuse.
- Stakeholders targeted to offer such a program consider that its primary focus should be to support mentalization of self and parenthood and mentalization of trauma.
Pregnancy and the year following childbirth is a critical transitional period—a time of risk and opportunities. The level of adaptation that pregnancy and the birth of a child requires makes this one of the most critical periods for a woman’s mental health.Footnote 1 Such an important life transition is a challenge even for adults with no apparent biological, psychological, marital or socioeconomic vulnerabilities. The challenge associated with pregnancy or birth may be even more intense for adults who experienced adverse life events, such as childhood abuse or neglect.
There is extensive evidence confirming that childhood abuse and neglect have mentalFootnote 2,Footnote 3 and physical healthFootnote 4,Footnote 5 consequences that persist into adulthood. Disorders in adults associated with childhood trauma include major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, conduct disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, substance use disorder, obesity, arthritis, high blood pressure, migraine headaches, cancer and strokes. Pregnancy and the birth of a child may trigger or intensify these latent or apparent disorders.Footnote 6
Pregnant women with personal histories of childhood trauma are at increased risk of significant challenges, pain and distress. They are also at increased risk of having limited access to personal and social protective factors. Expecting a child may resurrect unresolved attachment trauma;Footnote 7 such non-mentalized trauma (i.e. trauma that are denied, reported incoherently or for which the victim takes the blame) have been associated with negative feelings towards the baby and motherhood, and difficulties in intimate relationships.Footnote 8 Women who experienced childhood trauma report common complaints of pregnancy significantly more often Footnote 9 and are more likely to have a high-risk pregnancy.Footnote 10,Footnote 11 In addition, they are more at risk of intimate partner violence than pregnant women who have not experienced childhood trauma.Footnote 12,Footnote 13 They are also at greater risk of trauma-related symptoms, such as dissociation and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder,Footnote 14 as well as symptoms not specific to trauma, such as anxiety and depression.Footnote 15,Footnote 16
The strategies often used to regulate intense negative emotions in adults with a history of trauma (e.g. dissociation, avoidance, psychoactive medication, alcohol or drug use/abuse) may actually interfere with parenting or affect the fetus and eventually the child. Women who experienced maltreatment in childhood are more inclined to be isolated during pregnancyFootnote 17 and in the years following childbirth,Footnote 18 and to report low satisfaction with the social support they receive.Footnote 19
Although the literature on expectant fathers who experienced childhood trauma is scant, we can assume they have similar challenges given that 10% of men in the general population experience significant psychological distress after the birth of a child.Footnote 20 Moreover, childhood maltreatment is associated with important long-term consequences in men as well as women.Footnote 21
Risk trajectories associated with early experiences of abuse and neglect may be transmitted from one generation to the next. For instance, early in their development, the majority of children born to a mother with a personal history of abuse or neglect develop insecure attachment strategies (82% vs 38% of the general population) and as many as 44% (vs 15% of the general population) display disorganized/disoriented attachment.Footnote 22 Disorganized attachment is a significant precursor of social, intellectual, cognitive, affective and behavioural difficulties.Footnote 23,Footnote 24 Children of mothers with personal histories of trauma are also at greater risk of presenting with developmental problems such as biological anomalies in the physiological regulation of stressFootnote 25,Footnote 26,Footnote 27, neurodevelopmental disordersFootnote 10 and emotional and behavioural problems.Footnote 18,Footnote 28,Footnote 29,Footnote 30 In addition, empirical evidence supports the notion of intergenerational cycles of childhood maltreatment.Footnote 31,Footnote 32,Footnote 33
Given the high prevalence (32%) of reported child maltreatment in Canada,Footnote 21 a significant number of expectant parents have a personal history of abuse or neglect. Considering (1) the multiple challenges expectant parents encounter during the transition to parenthood; (2) the empirical evidence for the intergenerational transmission of risk following childhood trauma; and (3) the fact that intervening soon after birth may already be late as some intergenerational impacts of parental trauma can be identified immediately after birthFootnote 25, there is a definite need for prenatal interventions specifically designed for this population. Such interventions should aim to promote the physical and mental health of expectant parents who experienced childhood trauma; promote the psychosocial development of their child; and interrupt intergenerational cycles of abuse and neglect.
Different programs are offered worldwide to support parents considered at “high-risk”: the Nurse–Family Partnership,Footnote 34 Circle of Security,Footnote 35 Early StartFootnote 36 or Minding the Baby.Footnote 37 The program with the strongest evidence for preventing childhood maltreatment is the Nurse–Family Partnership.Footnote 38 All of these programs generally include home visitations and mainly target adults who have difficulties responding to infant needs or who present general risk factors (e.g. adolescent motherhood, poverty, drug use). However, they are not specifically designed to address the particular challenges associated with the experience of childhood trauma or do not evaluate their effects in parents with histories of abuse or neglect.Footnote 39
Conceptualizing specific interventions for this population may be important, as the way adults with histories of abuse or neglect view their experiences plays a distinctive role in their adaptation to parenthood and in the attachment relationship they develop with their child.Footnote 8,Footnote 22 A recent literature review confirmed that there are currently very few perinatal interventions for parents with histories of trauma and that no intervention was evaluated with fathers.Footnote 39 Many of the programs listed above are designed to intervene primarily during the postnatal period. Only two programs specifically designed for adults with histories of trauma are delivered primarily during pregnancy: Survivor Moms Companion,a self-help manual,Footnote 40 and the Perinatal Child–Parent Psychotherapy,Footnote 41 which involves one-on-one psychotherapy. Prenatal interventions are required for different reasons. First, parents are psychologically and physically more available during this period than after the birth of the child. It has been suggested that pregnancy invariably activates internalized attachment representations,Footnote 42 making pregnancy an ideal time for clinical approaches that aim to rework internalized object relationships.Footnote 43 From a practical stance, parents may be unavailable to participate in interventions after the child’s birth, when obligations and responsibilities are numerous. Overall, perinatal interventions for parents who experienced interpersonal traumas in childhood were safe and acceptable to parents, but further research is required.
Sensitive parenting may require that someone has previously been sensitive to the parent’s own history and psychological conflicts. Based on this reasoning, prenatal interventions offer the opportunity to sensitively accompany the person in the development of their identity as a parent, while the focus of postnatal interventions can be placed on the child and the parent–child relationship. As well, intervening in the postnatal period, however early, may be considered more therapeutic than preventive as intergenerational impacts of childhood maltreatment are observed immediately after the child’s birthFootnote 25 and important problems in the mother–child attachment relationship may already be in place at the time of consultation.Footnote 22 Prenatal interventions would complement existing postnatal programs in preventing the emergence of difficulties in the parent–child relationship and may help interrupt the intergenerational transmission of risk associated with childhood maltreatment.
Considering the lack of prenatal interventions for adults with personal histories of childhood maltreatment, the aim of the present study was to consult health care providers and community organizations about the actions that should be taken during a prenatal group intervention designed to help expectant parents who experienced childhood trauma.
Delphi consensus development method
The Delphi consensus development method was used to identify important actions that should be accomplished during a prenatal group intervention for expectant parents who experienced childhood abuse or neglect. The Delphi method is widely used by health care professionals to determine sets of priorities in relation to health practice and research,Footnote 44,Footnote 45 and it has been previously used to establish guidelines on how to support people with personal histories of trauma.Footnote 46
The goal of the Delphi method is to reach a consensus among a panel of experts on a specific domain. Consensus is reached using a series of questionnaires that experts complete in two or more rounds. After each round, the results are summarized and the experts are invited to discuss their responses. A revised questionnaire is then presented and the participants are encouraged to re-evaluate their earlier answers in light of the discussions. This process eventually leads to a decrease in the variance in experts’ ratings of priorities in a domain and the achievement of a consensus about a certain number of priorities.
Supporting the transition to and engagement in parenthood (STEP)
STEP is a clinical research program carried out at the Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières and funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada. The aim is to design, deliver and evaluate an innovative group accompaniment program for expectant parents who experienced interpersonal trauma in childhood. Ultimately, the aim of the program is to (1) promote the physical and mental health of adults with histories of childhood trauma who are transitioning to parenthood; (2) promote the psychosocial development of the program participants’ children; and (3) interrupt intergenerational cycles of abuse.
The present study reports on the first steps of the program’s development (see Figure 1). The program is designed for adults with histories of abuse or neglect who either do or do not present with or currently experience psychosocial difficulties. The program aims to complement existing interventions and services for expectant parents and promote participation of parents with histories of childhood trauma in such services.
The research was initiated by three project leaders who are clinical psychologists and researchers in the fields of mental health, child development and parenting. The research also involved 18 partners from 10 independent organizations that offer services to expectant parents, families and/or other adults who experienced childhood trauma. Three of these 18 stakeholders identified themselves as more or less qualified to complete the Delphi consensus development process, but one had to withdraw to take maternity leave. Fifteen professionals from nine organizations participated in the first round of consultations, 15 in the in-person discussions and 14 in the final round of consultations. All participants were francophone and worked in Quebec. Stakeholders were selected by the project leaders for their expertise in childhood trauma; childhood sexual abuse; parental neglect; intimate partner violence; pregnancy, childbirth and delivery; parenting in the context of vulnerabilities; parent–child relationships; fatherhood; prevention of child abuse and neglect; child protection; Indigenous communities; individual psychotherapy with survivors of trauma; group intervention; health care management; community services; health care; and program evaluation. Table 1 provides more information on the participants.
|Work setting||Training||Primary occupation|
|Academic||Clinical psychology||Service to the population|
|Governmental agency||Social work||Service to the population|
|Governmental agency||Nursing||Coordination of services|
|Governmental agency||Social work and management||Coordination of services|
|Governmental agency||Psychoeducation||Coordination of services|
|Non-governmental organization||Social work||Coordination of services|
|Non-governmental organization||Psychoeducation||Coordination of services|
|Non-governmental organization||Social work||Coordination of services|
|Non-governmental organization||Law||Coordination of services|
|Non-governmental organization||Psychoeducation||Service to the population|
|Non-governmental organization||Psychology||Service to the population|
|Non-governmental organization||Animation and training||Service to the population|
|Non-governmental organization||Animation and administration||Service to the population|
|Non-governmental organization||Midwifery||Service to the population|
|Abbreviation: STEP, Supporting the transition to and engagement in parenthood.|
After reviewing clinical and empirical literature on parenting interventions and interventions with parents and victims of trauma, the three project leaders first identified a preliminary list of actions to accomplish during a prenatal group intervention with adults with personal histories of childhood trauma. The selected actions had to be particularly pertinent to adults with histories of interpersonal trauma, and sufficiently appropriate and safe to be conducted during pregnancy. Following the team discussions, the project leaders identified six core themes that they determined to be important for expectant parents who are trauma survivors: attachment; mentalization (the ability to think of behaviours in terms of underlying mental states such as emotions, motivations or beliefs); transition to parenthood; emotion regulation; trauma; and social support. A starting list of 36 potential actions covering these core themes was proposed. The preliminary list of actions is presented in Table 2.
|Actions for prenatal group intervention||ImportanceTable 2 - Footnote a||AvailabilityTable 2 - Footnote b|
|Mean||Standard deviation||Mean||Standard deviation|
|Theme: Attachment relationships||4.40||0.85||3.10||1.02|
|To discuss the children’s emotional needs||4.53||0.74||3.29||1.07|
|To provide information on the importance of the parent-child attachment relationship (e.g. for the development of the child’s sense of security)||4.33||0.98||2.93||1.00|
|To address strategies to foster the development of a secure attachment relationship between the parent and the child (e.g. to be sensitive to the child’s needs)||4.33||0.82||3.07||1.00|
|To help identify the person’s strengths as a parent||4.60||0.63||2.86||1.35|
|To foster the identification of positive parental models in the parent’s personal history and of the behaviours that should be reproduced as a parent||4.47||0.64||2.36||1.08|
|To support reflecting on the person’s parental values||4.33||0.62||2.79||1.25|
|To help identify the person’s vulnerabilities as a parent||4.33||0.72||2.64||1.22|
|To support reflecting on the challenges that the person may encounter in their parental role (e.g. to think about the implications of having a child)||4.33||0.82||2.86||1.29|
|To anticipate and discuss the specific situations where the child’s needs may potentially compete with the parent’s needs (e.g. the child needs to be reassured at night when the parent is tired)||4.27||0.88||2.79||1.19|
|To discuss the importance of the parent reflecting on what goes through the mind of their child (e.g. trying to identify the emotions, desires or intentions behind the behaviour of the child)||4.27||0.96||2.43||1.34|
|To support the person in the development of a realistic vision of what it is to be a parent (e.g. to understand that it is not possible to be perfect)||4.13||0.74||2.86||1.10|
|To explain that it is possible to exercise control over our own actions and that this faculty can improve||4.00||0.65||2.36||1.01|
|To discuss the importance of the parent reflecting on his/her reactions during interactions with the child (e.g. trying to identify their own thoughts and emotions)||3.80||1.08||2.43||1.28|
|To discuss the ideas that our thoughts do not determine who we are and that it is possible to have thoughts that we won’t ever act upon (e.g. briefly thinking about hitting their child does not make the parent abusive)||3.73||0.80||1.93||0.83|
|To teach the concept of mentalization||3.71||0.73||2.07||1.00|
|To foster the identification of negative parental models in the parent’s personal history and of the behaviours that should not be reproduced as a parent||3.53||1.13||2.29||1.14|
|Theme: Transition to parenthood||4.07||0.85||2.83||1.10|
|To give the person an opportunity to voice their reactions to pregnancy and emotions during pregnancy||4.47||0.64||3.21||1.19|
|To guide the person towards being able to identify the different emotions/reactions that can be triggered by the transition to parenthood (e.g. negative, positive or mixed emotions)||4.20||0.77||2.86||1.10|
|To bring up troubling emotions or reactions that some expectant parents may experience (e.g., if they have the impression that they will not be emotionally attached to the child)||3.53||1.13||2.43||1.02|
|Theme: Emotion regulation||3.87||0.85||3.07||0.95|
|To identify strategies to put in place when the parent will feel overwhelmed in their role||4.53||0.74||3.29||0.99|
|To support better recognition of the warning signs of emotional/psychological distress||3.80||0.94||3.43||0.85|
|To teach emotion regulation strategies in the context of parenthood (e.g. relaxation techniques)||3.27||0.88||2.50||1.02|
|To discuss the importance of protection in order to be safe and keep the child safe (e.g. to help the person to more effectively identify the contexts that will potentially place them at risk or place the child at risk)||4.40||0.74||2.79||1.19|
|To discuss how the unmet needs and frustrations of the adult victim of childhood maltreatment can emerge in their adult/parenting life (e.g. the need to feel adequate, the need to feel in control)||4.40||0.74||2.43||1.02|
|To discuss the potential impacts of the trauma on the adult’s perception and identity as a parent (e.g. to continue to see himself/herself as a victim, to see the child’s behaviours as malevolent)||4.27||0.80||2.50||1.09|
|To assist the person in identifying the normal childhood needs that were not met during the person’s own childhood||4.27||0.88||2.36||1.34|
|To inform about the potential impacts of trauma in the context of parenting (e.g. fear of repeating the trauma experienced, not being alert to risky situations)||4.20||0.86||2.43||1.40|
|To discuss the coping strategies often used by victims of maltreatment to protect themselves from the feelings and memories associated with the trauma (e.g. avoidance behaviours)||3.93||0.96||2.43||1.50|
|To provide information on the impacts of trauma (e.g. biological impacts, intense emotions, negative self-perception and of others, sense of insecurity)||3.80||0.94||2.57||1.45|
|To discuss the potential harmful effects on the parent and the child of behaviours or strategies commonly used to alleviate trauma-associated distress (e.g. alcohol or drug use/abuse, dissociation, avoidance) and to offer clues for alternative solutions||3.73||0.96||2.50||1.22|
|To identify the various situations that may cause trauma||3.60||0.99||2.43||1.34|
|Theme: Social support||4.23||0.73||3.43||0.91|
|To create an opportunity to seek support from community organizations||4.40||0.63||3.64||1.01|
|To suggest strategies to reinforce the parent’s social network||4.27||0.59||3.64||0.74|
|To create an opportunity to seek professional support||4.27||0.70||3.64||0.93|
|To discuss the importance of both parents for the child, even when one is less involved||4.13||0.83||3.36||0.93|
|To offer strategies to strengthen the parental couple or to discuss how to face the challenges of lone parenting||4.07||0.88||2.86||0.95|
The participants in the consultation process were first requested to rate in terms of importance the proposed actions using an anonymized online survey. A five-point Likert scale was used (1 = not important; 2 = somewhat important; 3 = important; 4 = very important; 5 = essential). Participants were also asked to propose additional actions and to identify the extent to which each action was being accomplished in their clinical setting using a five-point Likert scale (1 = different from existing services; 2 = slightly different from existing services; 3 = I don’t know if such an action is offered in my clinical setting; 4 = similar to existing services; 5 = identical to existing services).
This first round of the consultation process was followed by a one-day in-person meeting during which the results of the first round were presented and each action was discussed. Participants were invited to comment on their responses, to discuss the feasibility of these interventions and to identify the extent to which they replicate services already available to expectant parents in the participants’ own clinical practices. The discussions were recorded and used to refine the actions and to prepare a final list. One week after the meeting, participants received the revised list through a second online survey and were requested to code for a second time the importance they attributed to each action.
Ethical approval for the study was given by the Comité d’éthique de la recherche avec des êtres humains de l’Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CER15-226-10.04) and the Comité d’éthique de la recherche du Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec (CER2016-016-00).
Round 1 (online survey)
A total of 15 stakeholders completed the first round of consultations. The results are presented in Table 2. Overall, each dimension was considered important. Top-ranked themes for discussion included attachment relationships, followed by social support, mentalization, trauma, transition to parenthood and emotional regulation. All actions obtained an average score of over 3, indicating their importance in the context of working with expectant parents who experienced trauma in childhood. While the themes of attachment relationships and social support were rated by the experts as the most important, they were also more likely to be offered in existing services compared with those actions that aim to help people process the trauma and improve mentalization, which appear more innovative.
Fifteen participants attended the one-day discussion meeting. The relevance, feasibility and implementation of each action were discussed to refine them. Overall, the group agreed on some general considerations. One of those considerations was that all actions that implied a passive role in participants (teaching, informing, etc.) had to be redefined in order to involve participants actively in the intervention and to make sure that the professionals delivering the program do not present themselves as experts with solutions that have to be implemented by the parents. In other words, rather than providing information or teaching skills, the intervention should aim to support participants’ sense of competence and personal agency. Another consideration was that the actions should not try to identify deficiencies, but rather should be formulated as opportunities for self-development for all expectant parents. In other words, the program should be presented as an “accompaniment program” rather than as an “intervention.” The group also agreed that the program should listen to and address participants’ needs before discussing the children’s needs—the focus should first be on the “developing parents” and later on the “developing children.” Stimulating sensitive parenting cannot be accomplished without being sensitive to parents’ personal history, reality and internal conflicts. In addition, the actions had to be gender-specific rather than gender-neutral, and thus be delivered differently to men and women.
Overall, the group recommended that the program be designed in a way that helps participants gain awareness of their personal strengths and weaknesses; to think, in a compassionate fashion, about how their past experiences influence how they perceive themselves as person and a parent today; and to be sensitive to issues relevant to the experiences of expectant mothers and fathers. As a result, mentalization was reconsidered from being a specific dimension to address with future participants to being the core framework of the intervention. The six themes were thus regrouped in two broader categories: (1) actions with the aim of stimulating participants’ mentalization about themselves and their experience of parenthood; and (2) actions with the aim of stimulating participants’ mentalization about their adverse life experiences.
Round 2 (online survey)
Actions were refined by the project leaders and a final list of 22 (15 actions on mentalizing self and parenthood and 7 on mentalizing trauma) was sent to the stakeholders in an online survey. Fourteen participants completed this final round anonymously. The results, ranked in order of importance, are presented in Table 3. Overall, all actions were considered important.
|Overall ranking||Actions for prenatal group intervention||MeanTable 3 - Footnote a||Standard deviation|
|Theme 1 – Mentalization of self and parenthood|
|1||To discuss the specific situations where the person’s needs will potentially compete with the child’s needs (e.g. the child is in need of reassurance at night when the parent is tired)||4.50||0.65|
|3||To support the person in elaborating a realistic version of what it is to be a parent (e.g. to understand it is not possible to be perfect)||4.46||0.66|
|4||To support reflecting on the signs of emotional distress and to discuss the available forms of support (e.g. emotional, material assistance, coaching, physical assistance, socialization) that are the most appropriate for the person’s specific needs||4.43||0.85|
|5||To guide the person in identifying the different emotions/reactions arising as a response to parenting in general and for this person specifically, and to offer a place to voice opinions on these emotions (negative, positive or mixed emotions)||4.36||0.63|
|6||To support reflecting on the person’s strengths and weaknesses as a parent||4.36||0.50|
|8||To reflect on the emotional needs of children and what these needs may trigger in the parent in terms of emotions, thoughts and behaviours||4.29||0.61|
|9||To support reflecting on the typical challenges that parents encounter and to help identify those that this person is inclined to meet in their parental role||4.29||0.83|
|11||To foster the identification of positive as well as negative parental models in the person’s personal history and to reflect on the influence of these models on the person’s perception of parenthood and on the future relationship with the child||4.21||0.97|
|12||To support reflecting on the intentions and motivations underlying the behaviours of the child and to discuss contexts that may influence the person’s interpretation of the child behaviours||4.21||0.70|
|13||To support reflecting on the person’s values as a parent||4.14||0.77|
|14||To support reflecting on the affective, cognitive and behavioural strategies that the person is considering using when feeling destabilized after the arrival of the child||4.14||0.86|
|17||To support reflecting on the parent’s social network||4.00||0.68|
|18||To support reflecting on the importance of both parents for the child, even when one of them is less involved||3.93||0.83|
|19||To support reflecting on parents’ relationships in the context of parenthood and on the experience of being a lone parent||3.79||0.80|
|22||To discuss psychological functioning by illustrating its principles with concrete examples (e.g. it is possible to exercise control over our own actions and that this faculty can be improved; our thoughts do not determine who we are, and it is possible to have thoughts that we won’t ever act upon)||3.57||1.09|
|Theme 2 – Mentalization of trauma|
|2||To discuss the potential impacts of trauma in the context of parenting (e.g. fear of repeating the trauma)||4.50||0.65|
|7||To stimulate the potential to reach out for help and for community services support||4.36||0.74|
|10||To discuss the coping strategies often used by victims of maltreatment to protect themselves from the feelings and memories associated with the trauma (e.g. avoidance behaviours), and to identify how the typical challenges of parenthood may exacerbate or interfere with the use of such strategies||4.29||0.91|
|15||To support reflecting on the contexts that may potentially be a risk for the parent’s and for the child’s security||4.14||0.77|
|16||To support identifying the normal childhood needs that were not met during the person’s own childhood. To discuss how these unmet needs can affect typical parenthood challenges (e.g. difficulty in tolerating the child’s dependency or, eventually, their developing autonomy)||4.07||0.83|
|20||To identify the various situations that may cause trauma||3.79||1.12|
|21||To support a discussion on the impacts of trauma on diverse spheres of functioning (e.g. biological impacts, intense emotions, negative self-perception, sense of insecurity)||3.79||1.12|
The aim of the present study was to consult with health care providers and community organizations about the actions that should be accomplished by prenatal group programs designed to help adults with personal histories of childhood trauma.
The research led to three main observations. First, we identified very few prenatal interventions specifically designed for expectant women and men who have personal histories of abuse or neglect, despite the long-term and intergenerational consequences associated with these adverse childhood experiences.Footnote 39 Second, our results confirm that health care providers and community organizations consider such an intervention important and a valuable addition to the services they already offer to victims of abuse or expectant parents. Third, the mentalization framework should be considered when developing such a program, with actions aimed at supporting participants’ mentalization of their experience of parenthood and mentalization of their adverse childhood experiences.
A focus on mentalization is in accordance with recent clinical and empirical literature. Mentalization-based interventions integrate psychodynamic, cognitive and neurodevelopmental theories.Footnote 47,Footnote 48 Mentalization-based approaches typically aim to reinforce participants’ ability to think of their behaviours and those of others (for instance, their baby) in terms of mental states. While empirical evidence confirms the efficacy of such interventions among adults with severe psychological difficultiesFootnote 49 and among parents of young children,Footnote 50 the interventions have never been specifically adapted for expectant parents with personal histories of childhood trauma. Enhancing mentalization could play a major protective role in parents who experienced childhood trauma: mentalization abilities in pregnant women with personal histories of childhood abuse correlate with their engagement in parenthood and with the quality of their couple relationship during pregnancyFootnote 8 and predict the quality of the attachment relationship they develop with their baby.Footnote 22 However, enhancing mentalization in parents for whom the normal development of this ability was disturbed by adverse life circumstances is complex and calls for specific adaptations.Footnote 51
This study adds to the literature on the provision of an empirically and clinically grounded framework for the development of a prenatal accompaniment program aimed at expectant parents who experienced childhood abuse or neglect. The actions identified by the stakeholders during this Delphi process differ from what currently exists in terms of prenatal psychosocial interventions in Quebec. The principal aim of many of the programs offered to the general population is to provide information on pregnancy, child development and child care. These programs, which are mainly informed by social learning theories, focus on enhancing knowledge, skills and confidence in parents through role models, practical exercises and feedback.Footnote 52Several prenatal programs have been designed for at-risk parents, and many have been shown to lead to significant improvement in parental functioning and to positive outcomes for children.Footnote 39,Footnote 52,Footnote 53,Footnote 54
However, to the best of our knowledge, few interventions specifically address the unique needs of parents with personal histories of trauma or use a theory of trauma as conceptual framework. Even parenting interventions aimed at preventing childhood maltreatment and trauma are rarely informed by trauma theories.Footnote 55 In other words, these programs do not consider the challenges that face people who grow up in environments where their needs or vulnerabilities were neither considered nor respected in becoming parents and participating in psychosocial interventions.
Public and community services for parents and children represent an institutional space within which several approaches or perspectives coexist. Some of these are contradictory in the actions they offer to families. The implementation of a new service model for expectant parents with histories of trauma must consider this institutional complexity.
This study had some limitations. First, the priorities presented here reflect the perspective of stakeholders in health care and from community organizations and may not reflect the position of adults who will ultimately benefit from such psychosocial programs. Our team is investigating the points of view and specific needs in terms of prenatal interventions of adults with personal histories of childhood trauma. Second, the panel of professionals recruited for this research reflects the diverse range of services offered to victims of abuse or neglect or expectant parents in the region where the study was conducted. A panel recruited elsewhere may have identified other priorities. Third, despite that having 15 professionals involved in this process is a considerable success, the number of participants is relatively small.
To the best of our knowledge, this paper articulates the first set of priorities for a clinical program aimed at supporting expectant parents with personal histories of childhood trauma. This set of priorities will represent the framework for STEP, a prenatal group program currently under development that, once evaluated and implemented, will be offered to women and men who experienced childhood abuse and neglect. This program may contribute to promoting the physical and mental health of adults with personal histories of childhood trauma who are transitioning to parenthood; promoting the psychosocial development of their children; and interrupting intergenerational cycles of abuse.
The Public Health Agency of Canada contributed financially to this research.
The authors want to thank all stakeholders who participated in this research, as well Christine Drouin-Maziade (project leader), Sylvie Moisan (research coordinator), Aurélie Baker-Lacharité (Masters student) and Vanessa Bergeron (PhD student) for their help in organizing this activity.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest
Authors’s contributions and statement
NB contributed to the design and conceptualization of the study; to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data; and to drafting the paper. RL contributed to the design and conceptualization of the study; to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data; and to revising the paper. CL contributed to the design and conceptualization of the study; to the acquisition of the data; and to revising the paper.
The content and views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Canada.
Report a problem or mistake on this page
- Date modified: