Gender-based analysis plus (GBA Plus)
Section 1: Institutional Gender-Based Analysis Plus Capacity
The Gender-Based Analysis (GBA) Plus responsibility centre provides input on policies, programs and services to achieve a representative public service. It also ensures that GBA Plus is integrated into decision-making processes, by ensuring that every Treasury Board submission assesses the potential implications of Public Service Commission of Canada (PSC) policies and programs on diverse populations of Canadians.
In 2022−23, we continued to integrate GBA Plus across key activities and business processes, ensuring that a GBA Plus lens is used, with a focus on the intersectional diversity characteristics, including gender-based differences of employees and applicants. Changes to our enabling legislation, the Public Service Employment Act, were implemented as they came into force. We developed tools to provide guidance to departments and agencies on removing barriers and biases that disadvantage equity seeking groups.
In addition, our GBA Plus Champion was engaged on and informed about GBA Plus implementation, and created opportunities to raise awareness where possible.
Section 2: Gender and Diversity Impacts, by Program
Core Responsibility: Public Service Hiring and Non-partisanship
Program Name: Oversight and Monitoring
Program Goals: Effective organizational oversight of staffing, data and information are accessible to Canadians and there is an efficient approach to oversight.
Target Population: Federal departments and/or agencies; public servants; the general public.
Distribution of benefits
First group | Second group | Third group | Fourth group | Fifth group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By gender | Men | Xchecked | Women | ||||
By income level | Low | Xchecked | High |
First group | Second group | Third group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
By age group | Youth | Xchecked | Senior |
Other key program impacts
The Oversight and Monitoring Program ensures the integrity of the merit-based public service hiring process. This program performs audits and investigations and conducts surveys to monitor organizational compliance with staffing legislation, regulations and policies, and to provide a system-wide view of the staffing environment of the public service. This program also monitors and analyzes hiring data and conducts research to provide departments, agencies and Canadians with an informed view of the dynamics of public service hiring. The findings of this program are used to monitor and understand organizational results, including other programs’ outcomes. As such, key impacts found in the PSC’s other programs may be derived from activities led by this program. In 2022–23, key achievements included the launch of the Employment Equity Promotion Rate Study - Three-Year Update.
GBA Plus Data Collection Plan
The PSC includes GBA Plus considerations when planning audits. In ongoing and planned audits, the PSC will seek to obtain and analyze disaggregated data, including for employment equity sub-groups and equity-seeking groups, whenever the audit methodology allows. It will include the GBA Plus lens in audit planning activities, as well as other oversight activities, where feasible.
The Oversight and Monitoring Program will seek to identify avenues for extracting and using disaggregated data on employment equity and other sociodemographic groups in its 2023–25 research plan, to support stronger policy, program and service development and implementation. When possible, variables relating to intersectionality, such as region and citizenship, will be analyzed along with employment equity information. The GBA Plus Responsibility Centre will be consulted and will have an opportunity to suggest variables of interest at the planning phases of each research project.
The PSC will also proactively integrate GBA Plus considerations into its information-gathering processes, including through the Staffing and Non-Partisanship Survey. The survey includes a third gender option for respondents and collects data on key sociodemographic factors, such as employment equity group membership, level of education, region and first official language. This format allows for a detailed analysis of interactions between gender and other employment equity groups, such as intersectionality in perceptions of merit and fairness in hiring, to detect potential differences in perception.
Core Responsibility: Public Service Hiring and Non-partisanship
Program Name: Policy Direction and Support
Program Goals: Confidence in the staffing system and a diverse public service. The Canadian government that retains skilled employees with efficient public service hiring which is seen to be non-partisan.
Target Population: Federal departments and agencies; public servants; the general public.
Distribution of benefits
First group | Second group | Third group | Fourth group | Fifth group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By gender | Men | Xchecked | Women | ||||
By income level | Low | Xchecked | High |
First group | Second group | Third group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
By age group | Youth | Xchecked | Senior |
Key program impacts statistics:
Statistics |
Observed Results |
Data Source |
Comment *All employment equity results Footnote 1 reflect the 2021−22 fiscal year |
---|---|---|---|
Percentage of employees who are women |
56.6% |
|
|
Relative promotion rates for women from the original study (2005 to 2018) and the updated results for each of the 3 subsequent periods studied (2006 to 2019, 2007 to 2020 and 2008 to 2021). |
4.3% 3.2% 2.8% 2.8% |
Women’s relative promotion rates decreased over the 4 periods but remained higher than rates for men. Women in the Scientific and Professional occupational category are still experiencing challenges compared to men. In the most recent study period (2008 to 2021), women holding a job in that occupational category still had lower relative promotion rates (-3.1%) (see Table 6). |
|
Representation of women as applicants, in the federal public service, and as a share of promotions |
Fiscal years 2017–18 to 2020–21 |
The representation of women applicants to job advertisements and their share of promotions continue to surpass their representation in the federal public service. |
|
Percentage of employees who are Indigenous people |
5.2% |
|
|
Relative promotion rates of Indigenous people from the original study (2005 to 2018) and the updated results for each of the 3 subsequent periods studied (2006 to 2019, 2007 to 2020 and 2008 to 2021). |
-7.5% -8.4% -8.5% -7.5% |
Indigenous people continue to have lower relative promotion rates and have remained consistent across the various time periods in our study (-7.5% for the most recent period ending in 2021). Indigenous people have had lower relative promotion rates in the Administrative Support, Administrative and Foreign Services, and the Scientific and Professional categories throughout the 4 periods. |
|
Representation of Indigenous people as applicants, in the federal public service, and as a share of promotions |
Fiscal years 2017–18 to 2020–21 |
Indigenous people had a lower representation as applicants than their representation in the federal public service over the 4 fiscal years. However, their representation in promotions continues to be higher than their representation as applicants. |
|
Percentage of employees who are members of visible minority groups |
20.1% |
|
|
Relative promotion rates for members of visible minorities from the original study (2005 to 2018) and the updated results for each of the 3 subsequent periods studied (2006 to 2019, 2007 to 2020 and 2008 to 2021).
|
0.6% 1.8% 2006 to 2019) 2.9% 4.4% |
Since the original study, the relative promotion rates of members of visible minority minorities steadily increased. Most visible minority subgroups experienced this increase in relative promotion rates. For example, Black public servants went from a negative relative promotion rate (-4.8%) in the original study period (2005 to 2018) to a statistically equivalent relative promotion rate in the latest study period (2008 to 2021). The relative promotion rates of members of visible minorities improved throughout the 4 periods. They increased from an equivalent rate for the 2005 to 2018 period to a relative promotion rate of 4.4% for the 2008 to 2021. For members of visible minority subgroups, Non-White West Asian, North African and Arab employees had a higher relative promotion rate in the Administrative Support, Administrative and Foreign Service and technical occupational categories throughout the 4 periods. Black and Filipino public servants had a lower relative promotion rate in the Scientific occupational category for most periods of the study. In the period ending in 2021, all visible minority subgroups in the Administrative Support Category had equivalent or higher relative promotion rates than their counterparts (see Table 3). |
|
Representation of the visible minority public servants as applicants, in the federal public service, and as a share of promotions. |
Fiscal years 2017–18 to 2020–21 |
Members of visible minorities’ representation as applicants continues to be larger than both their representation in the federal public service and their share of promotions. Among visible minority subgroups, this was also notable for public servants who identified as Black, South Asian/ East Indians and Non-White West Asian, North African or Arabs. |
|
Relative promotion rates for Black employees from the original study (2005 to 2018) and the updated results for each of the 3 subsequent periods studied (2006 to 2019, 2007 to 2020 and 2008 to 2021). |
-4.8% -4.2% -3.1% -1.1% |
A positive trend is also observed for Black employees. During the 2005 to 2018 period, public servants who identified as Black had lower relative promotion rates (-4.8%). For the period ending in 2021, Black public servants had relative promotion rates that were statistically equivalent. |
|
Percentage of employees who are persons with disabilities |
6.2% |
Persons with disabilities are the only employment equity group for which current representation remains below workforce availability. |
|
Relative promotion rates for employees who are persons with a disability according to the original study (2005 to 2018) and updated results for each of the 3 subsequent periods covered (2006 to 2019; 2007 to 2020; 2008 to 2021). |
7.9% (2005 to 2018) -9.4% (2006 to 2019) -11.2% (2007 to 2020) -12.6% (2008 to 2021) |
|
|
Representation of applicants who are persons with a disability, in the federal public service, and as a share of promotions |
Fiscal years 2017–18 to 2020–21 |
Over the 4 years, persons with disabilities had equivalent or higher representation as applicants compared to their share in promotions. However, both were lower than their representation in the federal public service. |
|
Percentage of applicants who self-declare as a person with a disability |
5.1% |
Public Service Resourcing System |
|
Percentage of new hires under the age of 35 |
53.7% |
PSC staffing files |
This demonstrates the PSC’s key role in contributing to the renewal agenda of the Government of Canada to ensure that the public service reflects the skills and professions representing the diversity of Canada. |
Percentage of executive appointees who self-identify as Indigenous |
5.1% |
Public Service Resourcing System |
This demonstrates the effectiveness of the PSC’s outreach to Canadians, and how its guidance and support enable departments and agencies to develop diversity and employment equity strategies. |
Percentage of indeterminate priority appointments of veterans by cohort |
71% |
PSC staffing files |
The indicator has progressed over the last 3 years from 61% in 2020-21, to 70% in 2021-22 and 71% this reporting period. 75% remains an ambitious but attainable target for the PSC, over time. |
Additional information
The PSC Employment Equity Promotion Rate Study - Three-Year Update reported the following additional key findings:
Intersectionality Footnote 2
Interaction between gender and identifying as a Black public servant.
As presented in our main result (see Table 1), women tend to have a higher relative promotion rate (2.8% for the 2008 to 2021 period). However, the results presented in Table 11a and 11b show that the compounding effect of being both a Black public servant and a woman significantly impacts the chances of promotion. More specifically:
- Black public servant women have lower relative promotion rates (-5.2%) than women who did not identify as a visible minority.
- Black public servant women have lower relative promotion rates (-7.0%) as compared to Black public servant men.
Other interactions
This study also measured interactions between other factors and employment equity status. An interesting interaction relates to gender and geographical location. Table 12 shows that the relative promotion rates of public servants in the National Capital Region were much higher than public servants outside the National Capital Region (63.1%). When considering the interaction with gender, we see that:
- the relative promotion rate for women compared to men was higher (8.3%) in the National Capital Region as compared to outside the region (-6.0%)
- the relative promotion rate of women in the National Capital Region compared to women outside the region (72.2%) was higher than the same comparison for men (49.5%).
The relative promotion rates of members of visible minorities and Indigenous Peoples, compared to their respective counterparts, were also higher in the National Capital Region than outside the region (as reported above for women). Conversely, persons with disabilities continue to have significantly lower relative promotion rates in the National Capital Region versus outside the region. (See Table 12.)
Representation of employment equity group members as applicants, in the federal public service, and as a share of promotions
Table 13 provides representation numbers of all employment equity groups, including visible minority subgroups as applicants, compared to their representation share in the federal public service for the fiscal years 2017–18 to 2020–21.
The main results are:
- The representation of women applicants to job advertisements and their share of promotions continue to surpass their representation in the federal public service.
- Members of visible minorities’ representation as applicants continues to be larger than both their representation in the general population and their share of promotions. Among visible minority subgroups, this was also notable for public servants who identified as Black, South Asian/ East Indians and Non-White West Asian, North African or Arabs.
- Indigenous Peoples had a lower representation as applicants than their representation in the general population over the 4 fiscal years. However, their representation in promotions continues to be higher than their representation as applicants.
- Over the 4 years, persons with disabilities had equivalent or higher representation as applicants compared to their share in promotions. However, both were lower than their representation in the federal public service.
The results of the PSC report on Citizenship of Applicants and External Appointments Footnote 3 show the following:
In line with our previous findings, there is an overall increase in non-citizens applying for jobs advertised in the public domain. Non-citizens, however, remain less likely to be appointed than Canadian citizens, and their appointment share has remained about the same since 2018−19 (2.5%).
- There has been an ongoing increase in the number and share of permanent resident applicants.
- Despite increases in their recruitment, permanent residents make up a smaller share of hires than applicants.
- Applicants who identify themselves as visible minorities are more likely to be non-citizens than their non-visible minorities counterparts. Further, non-citizens are less likely to be hired than citizens.
- As a result, there are fewer non-citizen visible minority applicants that are appointed.
- Most non-citizen applicants and hires are permanent residents.
- The percentage of non-citizen applicants for all employment equity designated groups is higher for men than for women.
Intersectionality with gender
Non-citizen men make up a higher percentage of applicants in all three employment equity groups than women (Annex 2, Table A2-12).
Other Key Program impacts
The Policy Direction and Support Program exists to support departments and agencies in experimenting and innovating with their staffing approaches and supporting strategies, to help them both meet their business needs and achieve their diversity and employment equity objectives. Through this program, the PSC provides guidance to organizations to enable legislative, regulatory and policy compliance. This includes providing expert advice to build understanding and help ensure that public service appointments are merit-based and reflective of Canada’s diversity. Key achievements for this program in 2022–23 included:
- establishing and approving a modernized framework to transform the Priority Entitlements Program
- modifying the appointment framework and developing guidance to prepare for the coming into force of the amendments to the Public Service Employment Act
GBA Plus Data Collection Plan
In partnership with the Recruitment and Assessment Services Program, as part of its recruitment activities, the Policy Direction and Support Program will continue to collect information on representation rates in hiring and staffing processes, based on self-declaration as a member of one or more designated employment equity group(s). This information is collected at the sub-group level for 3 of the designated groups (Indigenous persons, persons with disabilities and visible minority group members). This data-gathering process will be coupled with the PSC’s ongoing communications plan, focused on encouraging persons to self-declare.
Core Responsibility: Public Service Hiring and Non-partisanship
Program Name: Recruitment and Assessment Services
Program Goals: The strategic recruitment priorities of the Government of Canada and the renewal of the public service are achieved. This is done while reducing barriers for Canadians to have access to public service jobs and by hiring qualified individuals to deliver results for Canadians.
Target Population: Federal departments and/or agencies; public servants; the general public.
Distribution of benefits
First group | Second group | Third group | Fourth group | Fifth group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By gender | Men | Xchecked | Women | ||||
By income level | Low | Xchecked | High |
First group | Second group | Third group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
By age group | Youth | Xchecked | Senior |
Key Program Impacts Statistics:
Statistics | Observed Results | Data Source | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
Percentage of official language minority applicants | 11.9% (against target of at least 6.9%) | Public Service Resourcing System | This indicator includes English-speaking applicants in Quebec and French-speaking applicants outside of Quebec. |
Percentage of new hires who applied from outside the National Capital Region | 79.4% (against target of at least 75%) | Public Service Resourcing System | |
Percentage of accommodation requests processed within service standards | 78% (against target of least 90%) | Internal PSC data | Effective establishment of accommodation measures supports the timely assessment of candidates during an appointment process. |
Percentage of applicants who found GC Jobs easy to use when applying for a job. | 67% (against target of at least 80%) | Client satisfaction survey | The ease of access of the GC Jobs platform helps streamline the job application process. This may be especially helpful for applicants who have restricted time, for example due to family commitments, or limited access to Internet. |
Other Key Program Impacts
The Recruitment and Assessment Services Program exists to support departments and agencies in the hiring of qualified individuals into and within the public service, helping to shape a workforce reflecting Canada’s diversity. Through inclusive outreach and the use of modern tools, it reduces barriers for all Canadians seeking to access public service jobs. This program also collaborates with departments and agencies to create and implement innovative staffing and assessment approaches to meet the strategic recruitment priorities of the Government of Canada and support the renewal of the public service. Key achievements for this program in 2022–23 include:
- implementing WalkMe (Digital Adoption Platform), a new digital tool in the Public Service Resourcing System to guide users and make the system more intuitive
- reviewing recruitment programs, initiatives and inventories to mitigate potential assessment biases and barriers that disadvantage equity seeking groups
- beginning to review assessment tools to identify and mitigate the impact of potential biases or barriers that disadvantage equity seeking groups
- developing a guide, tools and a workshop to support federal departments and agencies in conducting evaluations of their assessment methods
- implementing services to help departments meet new Public Service Employment Act obligations related to accessible and inclusive assessments, as they come into force
- conducting “reach” solutions and proof-of-concept testing with online professional networking and job-matching sites
We continued to oversee the priority entitlements program, which aims to help people cope with career transitions due to various life and employment events. Through the priority entitlement program, the PSC supports the continuous employment of qualified employees, maintaining corporate knowledge and talent. This includes, but is not limited to, support to people who may be more likely to be marginalized, such as individuals who develop a disability.
GBA Plus Data Collection Plan
As it administers personnel assessment and development tests, the PSC will continue to monitor aggregated data on the performance of members of all employment equity groups (women, Indigenous Peoples, persons with disabilities, members of visible minorities), ensuring that the tools do not pose non-job-related barriers that disadvantage equity seeking groups. The new oral language assessment test will allow for detailed data collection, including input from candidates on their experience taking the test, to assess ease of use and possible barriers.
In addition, the new GC Jobs platform is expected to allow for advanced monitoring capabilities, tracking drop-off rates and representation rates of various groups at different stages of the application process, thus allowing for the collection of detailed data on potentially differentiated friction points for specific groups.
Page details
- Date modified: