Meeting between Patrick Borbey, PSC President, and Darlene Heather Carreau, Chief Administrator of the Courts Administration Service

*Information valid as of February, 2021

Introduction

Deputy Head

Ms. Darlene Heather Carreau was appointed as the Chief Administrator of the Courts Administration Service (CAS), on December 21, 2020.

Ms. Carreau is exercising the Public Service Commission’s (PSC) authority for the first time as Deputy Head (DH). A copy of the New Direction in Staffing (NDS) highlights for DHs is attached as Annex A.

Organizational Context

Mandate

CAS provides services to the Federal Court of Appeal, the Federal Court, the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada and the Tax Court of Canada. CAS is responsible for meeting the courts' requirements and ensuring public access to both the courts and their records. The following are a few examples of specific functions:

Challenges

During the current pandemic crisis, CAS has maintained its regular staffing activities as its services are considered essential to maintaining the operation of the Federal Court of Appeal, Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada, and Tax Court. In addition, CAS continued their yearly recruitment of University graduates for their Law Clerk Program. Under this initiative, graduates of law programs can be appointed to an 11-month term position to work under the direction of Judges in Courts. Recruitment under this program must be conducted every year to attract the best talent from top Universities around the world. To support the unique needs of this program, while ensuring compliance with all legislated requirements, the PSC implemented an administrative arrangement with CAS for the consideration of persons with a priority entitlement.

Population and Staffing Activities

Population

CAS is a medium-size organization that has a population of 790 employees (as of March 31, 2020). In the 2019-2020 fiscal year, it performed 608 staffing actions.

Staffing Activities

In 2019-2020, CAS proceeded with a total of 608 staffing activities:

Please refer to Annex B for additional details on staffing activities.

Time to Staff

There is insufficient data to provide time to staff results for internal or external staffing processes at CAS.

Staffing Framework

New Direction in Staffing Implementation

CAS’s staffing policies were updated in 2016-2017 to reflect some of the changes brought by the NDS. CAS continued its policy review work in 2017-2018, by adopting a new Staffing Monitoring Framework.

Appointment Delegation and Accountability Instrument Annex D Reporting

Use of the Public Service Official Languages Exclusion Approval Order and the Public Service Official Languages Appointment Regulations

In 2019-2020, CAS reported exclusions under the Public Service Official Languages Exclusion Approval Order and Public Service Official Languages Appointment Regulations that were still within the initial two-year period to become bilingual.

Approved Deputy Head Exceptions to the National Area of Selection Requirements for an External Advertised Appointment Process

In 2019-2020, CAS reported that they had not used any DH exceptions to the National Area of Selection.

Results of Organizational Cyclical Assessment

CAS has until October 1st, 2021 to report their first cyclical assessment results to the PSC.

Inquiries and Trends

CAS has made 24 inquiries to the Staffing Support Advisor since April 1, 2020.  Questions were concerning clarification of staffing requirements and guidance on how to prepare their cyclical assessment.

Oversight

Audits

Past Audits

CAS was among the departments and agencies selected for the pilot System-Wide Staffing Audit (SWSA) that was published in 2018. SWSA was a review of system-wide compliance in staffing. In all, 25 departments and agencies participated in the audit, providing a sample of 386 appointments; 5 of these appointments were from CAS. The audit report can be found at the following hyperlink: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-service-commission/services/publications/results-system-wide-staffing-audit.html#l.

Current Audits

CAS was among the 30 organizations selected for the Audit of Employment Equity Representation in Recruitment that was recently completed. The objective of the Audit was to determine whether the four designated employment equity groups were proportionately represented in recruitment processes and to identify key factors that influence representation in the appointment system among the four designated employment equity groups. The audit report was published in January 2021.

Investigations

Table 1 - Investigations
Nature of Issue Cases Received Cases Referred by Organization Closed - Not Accepted Completed Unfounded Completed Founded Ongoing
s.66 External Appointments (Merit, Error, Omission, Improper Conduct) 9 0 2 0 0 7
s.69 Fraud 7 3 4 3 3 0
s.118 Improper Political Activities - Employees 1 0 1 0 0 0
Total 17 3 7 3 3 7

Note: The numbers may not add up as discontinued cases, and cases resolved via early intervention are not included in this table.

There were three founded investigations from January 8, 2020 to January 8, 2021:

Staffing and Non-Partisanship Survey Results

45.2% of CAS employees completed the 2018 Staffing and Non-Partisanship Survey, compared to 47.6% for the public service in general. Below are key findings from CAS’s 2018 Staffing and Non-Partisanship Survey results:

Diversity Profile

As presented in the table below, there are gaps for Aboriginal peoples and persons with disabilities.

Table 2 - Diversity Profile
Designated Group Public Service
Work Force Availability (WFA)
CAS
EE data
2018-2019
CAS
EE data
2017-2018
Representation across the
Public Service of Canada
Women 52.7% 64.9% 66.3% 54.8%
Aboriginal Peoples 4.0% 2.4% 3.7% 5.1%
Persons with Disabilities 9.0% 6.3% 6.2% 5.2%
Members of Visible Minorities 15.3% 20.4% 17.8% 16.7%

Source: Employment Equity in the Public Service of Canada 2018-2019, and Employment Equity in the Public Service of Canada 2017-2018, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Priority Entitlements and Veterans

Appointments of Persons with a Priority Entitlement

From April 1, 2019 to January 7, 2021, CAS appointed one person with a priority entitlement (PPE) indeterminately who was one of their own PPEs.

Appointments of Persons with a Canadian Armed Forces Priority Entitlement

From the coming into force of the Veterans Hiring Act on July 1, 2015 until January 4, 2021, CAS has not made any appointments of persons with a Canadian Armed Forces priority entitlement.

Priority Clearance Requests

From April 1, 2019 to January 7, 2021, CAS submitted 315 priority clearance requests.

Table 3 - Priority Clearance Type
Priority Clearance Type Amount Percentage
Internal advertised processes
  • Internal advertised (12)
  • Appointment from a previously established pool (12)
  • Employment Equity (EE) process (1)
  63   20%
Internal non-advertised processes 71 22.5%
External advertised processes
  • External advertised (43)
  • Appointment from a previously established pool (25)
  • EE process (4)
  101   32%
External non-advertised processes 56 17.8%
Appointment of persons with a priority entitlement (includes term and indeterminate appointments)   1   0.3%
Student bridging 22 7%
Section 43 1 0.3%
Total 315 100%

Source: Priority Information Management System

COVID-19 Related Priority Clearance Requests

Since March 11, 2020, CAS has submitted one priority clearance request related to COVID-19 to the PSC.

Persons with a Priority Entitlement

CAS had six persons with a priority entitlement activated in the Priority Information Management System (PIMS) on January 13, 2021:

Table 4 - Priority Entitlement Type
Priority Entitlement Type Amount
Leave of Absence Returnee/Replacement 4
Relocation of Spouse or Common-law Partner 2
Total 6

Non-Partisanship in the Public Service

Since 2006-2007, the PSC received two candidacy requests from the same CAS employee:

2018 Staffing and Non-partisanship Survey results related to political activities:

General awareness sessions on political activities and non-partisanship for employees can be delivered upon request. The CAS Designated Political Activities Representative (DPAR) is Adèle Anderson, Chief, Workplace Management. The DPAR acts as a liaison with the PSC on matters related to political activities and non-partisanship.

Public Service Commission Initiatives

CAS requested the help of the Personnel Psychology Centre to support their talent management program. A service agreement was put in place to provide specialized assessment, coaching and executive counselling services. The objective is to promote greater self-awareness and targeted learning in order to develop the leadership potential of managers and executives.

Recruitment Programs

Federal Internship Program for Canadians with Disabilities

CAS is currently not participating in the Federal Internship Program for Canadians with Disabilities (FIPCD). The FIPCD is an excellent initiative to contribute to the Government of Canada’s Accessibility Strategy by having an intern and supporting them in skill development to increase their employability. The program also offers for a 50% salary reimbursement to hiring departments for the duration of the internship period. In addition, the PSC provides guidance on possible training opportunities offered by schools and associations.

Should CAS wish to hire interns, they may contact the PSC to explore this option at: cfp.diversitedetalent-talentdiversity.psc@canada.ca

Employment Opportunity for Students with Disabilities / Indigenous Student Employment Opportunity

Since January 1, 2020, CAS has submitted 1 request for the referral of students with disabilities, and 1 request for Indigenous students through Federal Student Work Experience Program (FSWEP). The Employment Opportunity for Students with Disabilities (EOSD) and Indigenous Student Employment Opportunity (ISEO) are excellent recruitment options to increase diversity in the workplace by hiring students living with disabilities or indigenous students. Managers and students are provided with resources, such as onboarding tools, training, and networking events. The candidates from both these initiatives are available year-round in the FSWEP ongoing inventory.

Federal Student Work Experience Program  

CAS has submitted 15 requests for referrals from FSWEP since January 2020. This program remains an excellent way for an organization to renew its workforce and bring new energy, ideas and approaches to its workplace. The number of available students in this program is 84,744Footnote 3.

Post-Secondary Recruitment

CAS has submitted 10 requests for referrals from the Post-Secondary Recruitment inventories in 2020.

Participation in initiatives related to the hiring of Indigenous Peoples

CAS is currently not participating in any initiatives related to the hiring of Indigenous Peoples. The PSC’s Aboriginal Centre of Expertise and the Treasury Board Secretariat’s Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer have developed an Indigenous Career Pathways (ICP) that may be of interest to CAS. It provides information on indigenous recruitment, career progression, as well as development and retention:

Staffing Support

Public Service of Commission Representatives and Organizational Contacts

The Staffing Support Advisor assigned to this organization is Daniel Morin. The primary organizational contact is Richard Vallée, Chief, Workforce Management, and the Head of HR is Vicky Lefebvre, Executive Director (Finance and Human Resources).

PREPARED BY:

Daniel Morin
Staffing Support Advisor

APPROVED BY:

Lynn Brault
Director General, Staffing Support, Priorities and Political Activities Directorate
Policy and Communications Sector

Patricia Jaton
Vice-President
Policy and Communications Sector

Annexes:

Annex A

A New direction in Staffing – A merit-based system that is effective, efficient and fair

Appointment Policy

New focus on core requirements to provide sub-delegated persons greater discretion in making an appointment

Delegation

All PSC monitoring and reporting requirements now found in the Appointment Delegation and Accountability Instrument

Monitoring and Reporting

Monitoring built by organizations, targeted to their needs

PSC Oversight

System wide-focus

This document should be read in conjunction with the Public Service Employment Act, the Public Service Employment Regulations, the PSC Appointment Policy and the PSC Appointment Delegation and Accountability Instrument.

Annex B

Population by tenure as of March 31

Figure 1 - Population by tenure as of March 31

Text version
Table 5 - Public Service Employment Act population by tenure as of March 31
 Year Indeterminate population Term population Casual population Student population Total population
As of March 31, 2015 477 77 45 18 617
As of March 31, 2016 507 92 48 21 668
As of March 31, 2017 521 87 24 21 653
As of March 31, 2018 512 94 41 15 662
As of March 31, 2019 545 96 51 23 715
As of March 31, 2020 617 105 51 17 790

Population by language requirements as of March 31, 2020

Figure 2 - Population by language requirements as of March 31, 2020

Text version
Table 6 - Public Service Employment Act population by language requirements of the position for fiscal year 2019 to 2020
Linguistic requirements of the position Population as of March 31, 2020 Percentage of population as of March 31, 2020
Bilingual 421 63%
Unilingual 246 37%
Unknowns 123 0%

Population by occupational group as of March 31, 2020

Figure 3 - Population by occupational group as of March 31, 2020

Text version
Table 7 - Top occupational groups, as a percentage of the Public Service Employment Act population for fiscal year 2019 to 2020
Occupational group Population as of March 31, 2020 Percentage of population as of March 31, 2020
PM – Programme Administration 226 29%
AS – Administrative Services 174 23%
CR – Clerical and Regulatory 156 20%
EC – Economics and Social Science Services 82 11%
Other 135 17%
Unknowns 17 0%

Population by region as of March 31, 2020

Figure 4 - Population by region as of March 31, 2020

Text version
Table 8 - Distribution by region, as a percentage of the Public Service Employment Act population for fiscal year 2019 to 2020
Region Population as of March 31, 2020 Percentage of population as of March 31, 2020
National Capital Region (NCR) 584 74%
Non-NCR 206 26%
Unknown 0 0%

External indeterminate hires by occupational group, 2019-2020

Figure 5 - External indeterminate hires by occupational group, 2019-20

Text version
Table 9 - External indeterminate hires by top occupational groups, for fiscal year 2019 to 2020
Occupational group Number of indeterminate hiring activities Percentage of all indeterminate hiring activities
CR – Clerical and Regulatory 29 37%
AS – Administrative Services 17 22%
PM – Programme Administration 12 15%
GS – General Services 9 12%
Other 11 14%
Total 78 100%

Staffing by region

Figure 6 - Staffing by region

Text version
Table 10 - Percentage of staffing activities in the National Capital Region compared with all other regions by fiscal year
Fiscal year Percentage of staffing activities in the National Capital Region (NCR) Percentage of staffing activities in all other regions (Non-NCR)
2015 to 2016 76% 24%
2016 to 2017 78% 22%
2017 to 2018 78% 22%
2018 to 2019 80% 20%
2019 to 2020 79% 21%

* Regional distribution excludes unknowns

Staffing by process type

Figure 7 - Staffing by process type

Text version
Table 11 - Number and percentage of staffing activities by type of process and fiscal year
Fiscal year Non-advertised processes (excludes unknowns) Advertised processes % of Non- advertised processes
2015 to 2016 12 166 7%
2016 to 2017 74 85 47%
2017 to 2018 37 87 30%
2018 to 2019 46 129 26%
2019 to 2020 79 150 35%

Staffing by appointment type

Figure 8 - Staffing by appointment type

Text version
Table 12 - Staffing activities by appointment type and fiscal year
Fiscal year Promotions Lateral and downward movements Appointments to the public service (includes casuals and students) Acting appointments (excludes appointments of less than 4 months) Total
2015 to 2016 54 78 291 46 469
2016 to 2017 118 58 228 38 442
2017 to 2018 57 39 218 28 342
2018 to 2019 73 62 329 42 506
2019 to 2020 102 79 366 61 608

Staffing by tenure

Figure 9 - Staffing by tenure

Text version
Table 13 - Staffing activities by tenure and fiscal year
Fiscal year Indeterminate staffing activities Term staffing activities Casual staffing activities Student staffing activities Total staffing activities
2015 to 2016 189 108 118 54 469
2016 to 2017 221 96 74 51 442
2017 to 2018 140 102 77 23 342
2018 to 2019 227 108 130 41 506
2019 to 2020 314 126 128 40 608

Key findings - Staffing and non-partisanship survey (2018)

Student program hires

Figure 10 - Student program hires

Text version
Table 14 - Student staffing activities by recruitment program and fiscal year
Fiscal year Federal Student Work Experience Program Post-Secondary Co-op/Internship Program Research Affiliate Program Total
2015 to 2016 49 5 0 54
2016 to 2017 49 2 0 51
2017 to 2018 23 0 0 23
2018 to 2019 41 0 0 41
2019 to 2020 38 2 0 40

External indeterminate and term hiring activities: Post-Secondary Recruitment Program and former student hires

Figure 11 - External indeterminate and term hiring activities: Post-Secondary Recruitment Program and former student hires

Text version
Table 15 - External indeterminate and term hiring activities: Post-Secondary Recruitment Program and former student hires by fiscal year
Fiscal year Post-Secondary Recruitment Program hires Hiring of former students
2015 to 2016 4 17
2016 to 2017 2 16
2017 to 2018 2 21
2018 to 2019 2 22
2019 to 2020 0 32

Hiring of former students includes indeterminate and term hires with experience in a federal student recruitment program within the last 10 years.

Internal time to staff

Figure 12 - Internal time to staff Public service median = 175 days, 2019-2020

Text version
Table 16 - Internal time to staff
Number of calendar days The number of internal appointments for which the TTS-IA was within the specified number of calendar days  for organizations subject to the Public Service Employment Act
0 calendar days 0
0 to 29 calendar days 13
30 to 59 calendar days 106
60 to 89 calendar days 256
90 to 119 calendar days 331
120 to 149 calendar days 313
150 to 179 calendar days 314
180 to 209 calendar days 258
210 to 239 calendar days 191
240 to 269 calendar days 143
270 to 299 calendar days 109
300 to 329 calendar days 91
330 to 359 calendar days 70
360 to 389 calendar days 49
390 to 419 calendar days 43
420 to 449 calendar days 41
450 to 479 calendar days 36
480 to 509 calendar days 20
510 to 539 calendar days 15
540 to 569 calendar days 23
570 to 599 calendar days 20
600 to 629 calendar days 18
630 to 659 calendar days 11
660 to 689 calendar days 15
690 to 719 calendar days 6
720 to 749 calendar days 11
750 to 779 calendar days 6
780 to 809 calendar days 5
810 to 839 calendar days 6
840 to 869 calendar days 10
870 to 899 calendar days 1
900 to 929 calendar days 4
930 to 959 calendar days 5
960 to 989 calendar days 4
More than 990 calendar days 43

Internal time to staff is calculated as the number of calendar days between the opening date of the advertisement and the date of the first notification,

The median internal time to staff for the public service (organizations subject to the Public Service Employment Act) for fiscal year 2019 to 2020 is 175 days

Internal time to staff for fiscal year 2019 to 2020

The data is insufficient for providing results on internal process times for the Courts Administration Service.

External time to staff

Figure 13 - External time to staff Public service median = 203 days, 2019-2020

Text version
Table 17 - Internal time to staff
Number of calendar days The number of external appointment processes for which the TTS-EA was within the specified number of calendar days for organizations subject to the Public Service Employment Act
0 calendar days 0
0 to 29 calendar days 55
30 to 59 calendar days 75
60 to 89 calendar days 95
90 to 119 calendar days 108
120 to 149 calendar days 166
150 to 179 calendar days 164
180 to 209 calendar days 160
210 to 239 calendar days 133
240 to 269 calendar days 122
270 to 299 calendar days 101
300 to 329 calendar days 80
330 to 359 calendar days 61
360 to 389 calendar days 50
390 to 419 calendar days 45
420 to 449 calendar days 34
450 to 479 calendar days 34
480 to 509 calendar days 21
510 to 539 calendar days 16
540 to 569 calendar days 19
570 to 599 calendar days 13
600 to 629 calendar days 7
630 to 659 calendar days 7
660 to 689 calendar days 4
690 to 719 calendar days 11
720 to 749 calendar days 6
750 to 779 calendar days 2
780 to 809 calendar days 4
810 to 839 calendar days 4
840 to 869 calendar days 0
870 to 899 calendar days 1
900 to 929 calendar days 0
930 to 959 calendar days 0
960 to 989 calendar days 0
More than 990 calendar days 0

External time to staff is calculated as the number of calendar days between the opening date of the advertisement and the date of the first estimated external hire.

The median external time to staff for the public service (organizations subject to the Public Service Employment Act) for fiscal year 2019 to 2020 is 203 days.

External time to staff for fiscal year 2019 to 2020

The data is insufficient for providing results on external process times for the Courts Administration Service.

Technical notes:

Sources:

Page details

Date modified: