Recent Findings and Recommendations: August 2024

In August 2024, the Chairperson of the RCMP External Review Committee (ERC) made the following Findings and Recommendations:

File Number File Type Keyword
C-112 Conduct
  • Conduct Measure
  • Financial penalty
C-113 Conduct
  • Conduct Measure
  • Mitigating factors
  • Aggravating factors
  • Proportionality
  • Prior discipline
C-114 Conduct
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Mitigating factor
  • Expert evidence
NC-208 Stoppage of Pay and Allowances
  • Inappropriate sexual relationships with members of the public
  • Absence of appeal submission
  • Effect of sick leave on SPA
  • Detrimental impact of SPA
  • Exceptional circumstances
  • Clear involvement
  • Requirements to order SPA
NC-209 Harassment
  • Admissibility of new evidence
  • Error of law
  • Burden of proof to establish harassment
  • Procedural fairness
  • Presumption of impartiality
  • Reasonable apprehension of bias
  • Right to be heard
NC-210 Harassment
  • Error of law
  • Burden of proof to establish harassment
  • Procedural fairness
  • Presumption of impartiality
  • Reasonable apprehension of bias
NC-211 Harassment
  • Error of law
  • Burden of proof to establish harassment
  • Procedural fairness
  • Presumption of impartiality
  • Reasonable apprehension of bias
  • Right to be heard
NC-212 Harassment
  • Error of law
  • Burden of proof to establish harassment
  • Procedural fairness
  • Presumption of impartiality
  • Reasonable apprehension of bias
NC-213 Harassment
  • Standing
  • Procedural fairness
  • Sufficiency of investigation
  • Clearly unreasonable
  • Key arguments
  • Factual errors
  • Accommodation
NC-214 Harassment
  • Standing to appeal – retired member
  • Length of appeal submissions
  • Admissibility of new evidence on appeal
  • Clearly unreasonable finding – No investigation mandated
  • Procedural unfairness finding – No opportunity to rebut Alleged Harasser’s information
  • Procedural unfairness finding – Reliance on information from outside sources/own opinion(s)
  • Alleged Harasser informed about harassment complaint – no error
  • Alleged Harasser’s response obtained without an investigation – no error
  • Alleged bias due to supervisory relationship – not established 
  • Alleged bias of Respondent – not established
  • Alleged biased of Harassment Unit – not established
  • Alleged unreasonable delay in receipt of Decision – not established 
  • Appeal allowed
NC-215 Harassment
  • Timeliness of harassment complaint – implicit granting of extension to limitation period
  • Standing to appeal – retired member
  • Admissibility of new evidence on appeal
  • Clearly unreasonable finding – No investigation mandated
  • Procedural unfairness finding – No opportunity to include supplemental information following initial complaint
  • Alleged Harasser informed about harassment complaint – no error
  • Alleged Harasser’s submission obtained without an investigation – no error
  • Alleged Harasser’s consent to information being shared with Appellant – purely technical procedural irregularity
  • Respondent’s reliance on Alleged Harasser’s response – no error
  • Alleged bias of Harassment Unit – not established
  • Alleged unreasonable delay in processing of file – not established
  • Alleged issue with Respondent’s location – not established
  • Appeal allowed
NC-216 Harassment
  • Recusal
  • Reasonable apprehension of bias
  • Test for harassment
  • Alleged harasser's intentions
  • New evidence
NC-217 Harassment
  • Clearly unreasonable
  • Investigation
  • Central arguments
  • Insufficiency of reasons
NC-218 Harassment
  • Length of appeal submissions
  • Admissibility of new evidence on appeal
  • Clearly unreasonable finding – No investigation mandated
  • Procedural unfairness finding – No opportunity to rebut Alleged Harasser’s information
  • Procedural unfairness finding – Reliance on information not contained in the record
  • Alleged bias
  • Alleged unreasonable delay in receipt of Decision
  • Appeal allowed
G-788 Harassment
  • Respondent’s Decision to deny harassment complaint–
  • New documents admissible at Level II- 
  • Respondent’s factual findings consistent with evidence-
  • Respondent did not misstate or misapply applicable legal test- 
  • Respondent did not ignore relevant principle when considering whether harassment had taken place.

If you would like to be notified when the ERC posts new Findings and Recommendations summaries, please contact us at org@erc-cee.gc.ca

Page details

Date modified: