Charities in the International Context
Introduction and overview
Canadian charities that operate abroad face a complex set of circumstances and a sometimes dangerous working environment. It can be difficult to be certain exactly what rules apply, which guidelines to follow, or if there are best practices that could inform how charitable activities should be carried out. Work is currently underway within the CRA (Charities Directorate), across the federal government, and internationally that is relevant to working in this challenging international environment. The following points to the relevant CRA rules and guidelines that apply. It also summarizes other federal initiatives and international work. It gives a short description of the relevant work, as well as citations to access source material.
Canada's Income Tax Act rules apply no matter where a Canadian registered charity operates. The rules allow it either to make gifts to qualified donees, or to carry on its own activities. Few foreign organizations are qualified donees. As a result, most Canadian charities operating outside Canada must do so in the form of actively delivering their own programs.
Today, charities may be operating under great difficulty in parts of the world where terrorism and other forms of violence prevail. The leaders of Canadian charities are called on to weigh such troublesome questions as how to meet desperate cases of need without providing support to one or another political faction or without prolonging the violence. In carrying out its mandate, the Directorate seeks to recognize the realities that charities face when operating under such difficult conditions. It welcomes helpful information and advice on this matter from the charities sector.
Terrorism can also become an issue in a different way–when a Canadian charity is used to support terrorism. This was the issue Parliament addressed when it enacted the Charities Registration (Security Information) Act in December 2001, as an important element in Canada's response to terrorism. The law deals only with the rare situation where classified intelligence information about terrorist activities is needed to exclude an organization from registration as a charity. In most situations, open-source information and normal procedures should be sufficient to establish if an organization does not meet the requirements for registration.
Other countries and international bodies have also examined how terrorist financing has flowed from and through charities in their countries. Canada took part in these discussions. Through this work, an international consensus has emerged on basic standards or "best practices" that could be used to reduce the risk of abuse anywhere in the world. The sponsors of this work are interested in feedback from Canadian charities. In addition, while most Canadian charities operating internationally follow such practices, consideration of this work can help ensure vigilance in maintaining the current high standards.
Registered charities are therefore encouraged to review the best practices that international agencies and foreign governments have put forward for consideration (International Best Practices; Policies in other Countries). The discussion on best practices covers subjects such as internal governance, fundraising, financial accountability, and maintaining control over the charity's resources, along with suggested warning signs that should attract the attention of directors.
For subjects falling within the Directorate's mandate, such as maintaining direction and control over international charitable programs, charities can refer to Guidance CG-002, Canadian registered charities carrying out activities outside Canada.
Charities Registration (Security Information) Act
Within the CRA, the Charities Directorate has a regulatory responsibility to identify problems and to take measures that protect and maintain public confidence in the charitable sector. In deciding whether organizations should be registered as charities, we need to ensure that the tax benefits reserved for Canada's charities are not used to provide support to terrorism in the guise of charity.
Canada and the international community recognized, well before September 11, 2001, that terrorist groups can use non-profit organizations for cover, legitimacy, and resources. In July 1996, at the Paris Ministerial Meeting on Terrorism, the G7/G8 nations agreed to adopt domestic measures to prevent terrorist financing through front organizations that have, or claim to have, charitable goals.
Canada further committed itself to introducing measures to prevent the financing and support of terrorism when it signed the United Nations International Convention on the Suppression of Financing of Terrorism on February 10, 2000. The Convention emphasized the need to cut off financial support for terrorists and specifically referred to the important role played by charities in the international support network of some terrorist groups.
In December 2001, the enactment of the Charities Registration (Security Information) Act, under Part 6 of The Anti-terrorism Act, re-defined the role and importance of protecting the integrity of Canada's registration system for charities in terms of Canada's anti-terrorism objectives. The Act's purposes are:
to demonstrate Canada's commitment to participating in concerted international efforts to deny support to those who engage in terrorist activities
to protect the integrity of the registration system for charities under the Income Tax Act
to maintain the confidence of Canadian taxpayers that the benefits of charitable registration are made available only to organizations that operate exclusively for charitable purposes
Countering terrorism is a complex issue. The Government recognized that criminal measures alone are not enough and that a broad range of tools, including new civil law remedies, are required. The Charities Registration (Security Information) Act introduces a special administrative measure that will help the Charities Directorate meet its regulatory responsibilities without affecting the vast majority of Canadian charities.
The legislation has been specifically designed to protect the use of very sensitive information that may reveal an organization's ties to terrorist groups. This allows the Charities Directorate to make proper use of all information relevant to deciding whether an organization should be registered as a charity under the Income Tax Act.
The legislation establishes a test: are there reasonable grounds to believe, based on criminal and security intelligence reports, that an organization makes its resources available, either directly or indirectly:
to a terrorist group that is a listed entity under the Criminal Code, or
to any other organization engaged in terrorist activities or in activities that support terrorist activities?
The Minister of National Revenue and the Minister of Public Safety each review the evidence and sign a certificate if they believe the test has been met. The certificate is then referred automatically to a judge of the Federal Court to determine the reasonableness of the ministers' decision.
The judge prepares a summary of the security and criminal intelligence reports, which he gives to the affected organization. The organization can then appear before the judge to argue against the certificate.
If the judge upholds the ministers' decision, the organization is barred from obtaining registration as a charity, or if already registered, it loses its registration. The bar to registration lasts for seven years. However, an organization can ask ministers to reconsider its case at an earlier point if there has been a material change in circumstances.
You can find:
You can find the names of listed entities on the website of Public Safety Canada.
International best practices
Canada's commitment to combating terrorism is further reflected in its participation in the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The FATF is an inter-governmental body, established in 1989, to set standards and promote effective implementation of legal, regulatory and operational measures for combating money laundering, terrorist financing, and other related threats to the integrity of the international financial system. The FATF is therefore a “policy-making body” which works to generate the necessary political will to bring about national legislative and regulatory reforms. The FATF currently comprises 34 member jurisdictions and 2 regional organizations (members), representing most major financial centres in all parts of the globe.[Footnote 1]
The FATF has developed a series of Recommendations that are recognized as the international standard for combating of money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. They form the basis for a co-ordinated response to these threats to the integrity of the financial system and help ensure a level playing field. First issued in 1990, the FATF Recommendations were revised most recently in 2012, to ensure that they remain up to date and relevant, and they are intended to be of universal application.
Most notably, FATF Recommendation 8 states members should review the adequacy of laws and regulations that are related to entities that can be used for the financing of terrorism. It further states that non-profit organizations, including charities, are particularly vulnerable, and members should ensure that they cannot be misused:
by terrorist organizations posing as legitimate entities
to exploit legitimate entities as conduits for terrorist financing, including for the purpose of escaping asset freezing measures
to conceal or obscure the clandestine diversion of funds intended for legitimate purposes to terrorist organizations
The document includes an Interpretive Note to Recommendation 8. The Interpretive Note explains the objectives of the recommendation and offers specific measures that members should put into place to ensure that their non-profit sectors are not misused for terrorist financing purposes.
Further, in October 2002, the FATF held discussions aimed at establishing practical guidelines to implement Recommendation 8 (then known as Special Recommendation VIII). Canadian officials played a prominent role in these discussions and made a significant contribution to the drafting of a "best practices" paper for non-profit organizations. The resulting paper, entitled Combating the Abuse of Non-Profit Organizations: International Best Practices, was released on October 11, 2002, and offers some preliminary practical guidelines, and establishes a basis for best practices, on how to prevent charities and non-profit organizations from being misused to finance terrorism.
While most Canadian charities are well aware of how they can best manage their programs to ensure the proper, charitable application of their resources, the FATF’s best practices publication offers some useful guidance, especially on internal governance practices.
The Charities Directorate invites your comments on the FATF best practices paper and the interpretive note. Please email them to: email@example.com.
Policies in other countries
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has issued a revised version of its publication entitled U.S. Department of the Treasury Anti-Terrorist Financing Guidelines: Voluntary Best Practices for U.S.-Based Charities.
The Charity Commission for England and Wales has issued a policy statement on charities and their alleged links to terrorism. In August 2007, the Commission published its updated Operational Guidance Charities and Terrorism. This document explains the principles underlying the Commission's handling of alleged links to terrorism among some U.K.-based charities. It also discusses how terrorist and other criminal groups can use charities for their own ends and outlines the duties and responsibilities of a charity's trustees to ensure that the organization's assets are not used to further the aims of any terrorist or terrorist group.
FATF members include: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong (China), Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea (Republic of), Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands (Kingdom of), New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Russian Federation, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, the European Commission, and the Gulf Co-operation Council.
Report a problem or mistake on this page
- Date modified: