Program 5.0: Defence Capability Development and Research - DPR 2015-16

Sub-Program 5.1: Capability Design, Development and Integration

The Capability Design, Development and Integration Program provides focused expertise to develop and introduce new capabilities, develop new knowledge, integrate knowledge from internal and external sources, develop new concepts, innovate ways to provide competitive advantage to military operations, and enhance the effectiveness of Defence programs. Results from this Program are accomplished by: developing, demonstrating, testing and evaluating advanced systems and technologies and integrating these and other scientific research into Defence programs; identifying lessons from on-going and historical operations; producing new concepts and doctrine; designing and assessing alternative capabilities; providing planning, oversight and expertise for the introduction and divestment of capabilities; and developing analyses to enable evidence-based decisions concerning the selection and effective use of capabilities at strategic, operational and tactical levels. The products and services from this program sustain Defence by directly enabling the Strategic Direction and Planning Support Program. They also enable aspects of the Defence Capability Elements Production Program, the Defence Ready Force Element Production Program, and the programs that deliver Defence Combat and Support Operations as well as Defence Services and Contributions to Government.

2015-16 Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)

Planned Spending Actual Spending Difference (actual minus planned)
349,845,124 387,949,569 38,104,445

2015-16 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned Actual Difference (actual minus planned)
Military – Regular Force 729 590 (139)
Civilian 865 1,363 498
TOTAL 1,594 1,953 359

Note: Variances between planned and actual FTEs at the Sub- and Sub-Sub-Program levels are primarily due to a shift in activities across the Program Alignment Architecture.

Due to rounding, the FE count at the Sub-Sub-Program levels may not add up to totals shown

Performance Results

Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Plans which make adjustments to the elements of Defence capability are established, aligned and monitored. % score on the Capability Design Development and Integration Evaluation Index. 81 - 100% N/A

Sub-Sub-Program 5.1.1: Capability Design and Management

The Capability Design and Management Program oversee the execution of activities that conceive, design, develop and introduce new or modify existing Defence capabilities which provide the ability to achieve a desired effect during the execution of a defence operation or the delivery of a Defence service. Defence capabilities are formed of various combinations of force elements, the entities that execute the tasks to achieve desired effects during an operation. This Program applies system-of-systems approaches to describe, analyse, design, and manage each individual capability as a system of capability elements (i.e., military personnel, materiel and information systems, information, and real property) which must be suitably integrated in order to produce new or enhanced force elements. Results are achieved through the oversight of Defence capability requirements specification, conception, and design; and the oversight and coordination of individual capability elements delivery and process specification for force element integration. This Program sustains Defence by directly enabling the Strategic Capability Planning Support Program and the lifecycle management programs responsible for the production, maintenance, and retirement of Defence capability elements. It also influences the Operational Readiness Production, Coordination and Command and Control Program.

2015-16 Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)

Planned Spending Actual Spending Difference (actual minus planned)
55,087,061 88,654,379 33,567,318

2015-16 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned Actual Difference (actual minus planned)
Military – Regular Force 249 251 2
Civilian 6 14 8
TOTAL 255 265 10

Performance Results

Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Options to modify Defence capabilities in order to fill individual capability gaps are produced. % score on the Capability Design and Management Evaluation Index. 81 - 100% N/A

Sub-Sub-Program 5.1.2: Concept, Doctrine Development and Warfare Experimentation

The Concept, Doctrine Development and Warfare Experimentation Program seeks to achieve predictability and reliability of performance and thereby realize enhanced opportunities for success and reduce the risk of failure when delivering Defence operations and services. Results are achieved by this program through conception, development, and testing of the principles, methods and approaches that in-turn become the concepts, doctrine and standards that guide how tasks should be performed at the strategic, operational and tactical levels during the delivery of Defence Combat and Support Operations and Defence Services and Contributions to Government. Innovations in the development and assessment of new concepts and doctrine are enabled through military experimentation services and related modelling and simulation services. Fundamental to this Program is the delivery of services that provide for and the collection, analysis, synthesis and distribution and integration of lessons learned from past operations. The products and services provided by this Program sustain Defence by directly enabling the Capability Design and Management Program and the Overarching Command and Control of Domestic and International Operations Program. This Program is also a key enabler to the Operational Readiness Production, Coordination and Command and Control Program.

2015-16 Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)

Planned Spending Actual Spending Difference (actual minus planned)
59,325,596 68,716,617 9,391,021

2015-16 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned Actual Difference (actual minus planned)
Military – Regular Force 389 244 (145)
Civilian 34 41 7
TOTAL 423 285 (138)

Performance Results

Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Operational concepts and doctrine improve agility during the introduction, preparation and application of Defence capabilities. % score on the State of Concept and Doctrine Evaluation Index. 81 - 100% 50%*
Experimental testing determines the suitability of new military concepts, doctrine, methods and systems for Defence needs. % score on the Warfare Experimentation Quality and Impact Evaluation Index. 81 - 100% 80%
Lessons learned from past operations are integrated to improve agility during the introduction, preparation and application of Defence capabilities. % score on the Lessons Learned Quality and Impact Evaluation Index. 81 - 100% 83%

Note: *The Canadian Forces Warfare Centre (CFWC) Joint Doctrine Branch completed 50% of the fiscal year work plan. The CFWC Joint Doctrine Branch was required to concentrate and maximize effort on a higher priority tasking, specifically the joint collective training exercise JOINTEX.

Sub-Sub-Program 5.1.3: Science and Systems Development and Integration

The Science and Systems Development and Integration Program aims to develop and synthesize new knowledge and integrate advancements in science, systems and technology to provide a competitive advantage in military operations and enhance the effectiveness of other defence programs. It also seeks to synthesize information and develop methods and analyses to enable evidence-based decisions concerning the effective use of Defence capabilities and improvements to the delivery of defence programs at strategic, operational and tactical levels across current and future time horizons. Results are achieved by this Program through: the conduct of basic research using scientific methods, the delivery of advanced systems and systems concepts; the testing and evaluation of existing systems and technologies; human systems integration; the development of advanced analyses; and the integration of science into other defence programs. The innovations and advancements in science, systems and technology that are delivered by this program sustain Defence by enabling the Capability Design and Management Program, the Concept Doctrine Development and Warfare Experimentation Program, and in some cases, the Overarching Command and Control of Domestic and International Operations Program. The products and services provided by this Program for the purpose of evidence-based decision making sustain Defence by enabling each of the sub-programs within Defence Capability Development and Integration Program as well as the Coordination and Command and Control programs that govern delivery of: Defence Combat and Support Operations; Defence Services and Assistance to Government; Defence Ready Force Element Production; and Defence Capability Element Production. This Program also directly supports the management and oversight of Defence as a whole.

2015-16 Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)

Planned Spending Actual Spending Difference (actual minus planned)
235,432,467 230,578,573 (4,853,894)

2015-16 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned Actual Difference (actual minus planned)
Military – Regular Force 91 95 4
Civilian 825 1,308 483
TOTAL 916 1,403 487

Performance Results

Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Bodies of knowledge, technologies and systems are explored, developed and integrated to realise enhanced levels of agility during the preparation and application of Defence capabilities. % score on the Development and Integration Evaluation Index. 80 - 100% 89%
Strategic and operational decisions that affect the agility of Defence are evidence based and informed by analytical methods, models and tools. % score on the Exploitation of Advice and Knowledge Evaluation Index. 80 - 100% 89%

Sub-Program 5.2: Strategic Direction and Planning Support

The Strategic Direction and Planning Support Program aims to identify the strategic demand for Defence capabilities and to enable strategic decisions and the development of strategic direction concerning the corresponding use of available resources to: apply and maintain existing capabilities; introduce new or modified capabilities; and divest of surplus capabilities with acceptable levels of risk across near- and long-term time horizons. In the near-term, a quantifiable relationship is established between Government and strategic direction, ongoing and contingency operations requirements and performance, defence roles, and readiness targets in order to align force element production resources. In the long-term, challenge areas that may require changes to the Defence capability and program portfolios are established. Results are achieved through monitoring, threat and security environment analysis, change requirement identification, trend synthesis, portfolio challenge identification, and portfolio alteration approach formulation and assessment. This Program sustains Defence by directly enabling the Defence Ready Force Element Production Program, the Defence Capability Element Production Program, the Defence Capability Development and Research Program, and the management and oversight of Defence as a whole.

2015-16 Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)

Planned Spending Actual Spending Difference (actual minus planned)
23,692,677 36,839,839 13,147,162

2015-16 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned Actual Difference (actual minus planned)
Military – Regular Force 87 81 (6)
Civilian 22 31 9
TOTAL 109 112 3

Notes: Variances between planned and actual FTEs at the Sub- and Sub-Sub-Program levels are primarily due to a shift in activities across the Program Alignment Architecture.

Due to rounding, the FTE cout at the Sub-Sub-Program levels may not add up to totals shown.

Performance Results

Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Plans that align the supply and demand for Defence capabilities in near-, mid-, and future-time horizons are established and monitored. % score on the Future Capability Gap Strategic Direction and Planning Support Evaluation Index. 81 - 100% 60%
% score on the Force Posture and Readiness Strategic Direction and Planning Support Evaluation Index 81 - 100% 85%

Sub-Sub-Program 5.2.1: Strategic Capability Planning Support

The Strategic Capability Planning Support Program provides the analyses that determine the overarching portfolio of all capabilities that will be required to successfully defend Canada and promote Canadian interests in future time horizons. This is accomplished through the assessments of Defence policy, direction from the Government of Canada, the external environment, internal performance, the strategic threat environment and the envelope of available resources. Modifying the capability portfolio typically requires decisions and precursor initiatives to take place in near-term time horizons and these are either initiated or facilitated by this Program. Results are achieved by this Program through activities that: identify required military effects; determine the capabilities needed to generate these effects; assess current and planned capabilities of defence against these needs; oversee the conception of possible approaches to mitigate capability shortfalls and reduce capability surpluses; facilitate decisions to determine which approaches are to be pursued; and develop high-level plans to enable and align programs that will deliver new capabilities and divest existing capabilities. The products and services provided by this Program sustain Defence by directly enabling the Capability Design and Management Program, as well as the Concept, Doctrine Development and Warfare Experimentation Program and the Science and Systems Development and Integration Program. Additionally, the broad evidence-based analyses provided by this Program directly enable the strategic management and oversight of Defence as a whole. This Program also has secondary influence on the co-ordination, development and control programs that govern the lifecycles of the capability elements.

2015-16 Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)

Planned Spending Actual Spending Difference (actual minus planned)
21,077,206 32,998,119 11,920,913

2015-16 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned Actual Difference (actual minus planned)
Military – Regular Force 69 56 (13)
Civilian 17 29 12
TOTAL 86 85 (1)

Performance Results

Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Awareness of expected differences between the supply and demand across the portfolio of Defence capabilities is established for mid- and long-term horizons. % score on the Strategic Capability Planning Support Evaluation Index. 81 - 100% 90%

Sub-Sub-Program 5.2.2: Strategic Force Posture Planning Support

The Strategic Force Posture Planning Support Program aims to maintain the sustainability of Defence’s Force Posture towards the achievement of Government of Canada expectations for Defence operations. Force Posture is a collective term used by Defence to characterize the balance in the operational state of force elements within Defence’s portfolio. Force elements may be in one of three operational states. They are either delivering Defence operations or services, ready to respond to operational contingencies, or in a state of reduced readiness. Readiness, which is an intrinsic part of Force Posture, refers to the capability, responsiveness, quantity and endurance requirements that force elements must meet in order to improve the potential for success and reduce undue risks when they are employed on operations. A balanced Force Posture, including the achievement of readiness targets, must be maintained to achieve effectiveness in the delivery of Defence operations and services across time. This Program establishes and manages the adjustment of near-term Force Posture and readiness targets and provides a bridge to longer-term capability planning. Results are achieved through monitoring, analysis and planning based on strategic direction as well as risk and opportunity assessments. The Strategic Force Posture Planning Support Program sustains Defence by directly enabling the Overarching Command and Control of Domestic and International Operations Program, the Operational Readiness Production, Coordination and Command and Control Program, and the management and oversight of Defence as a whole.

2015-16 Budgetary Financial Resources (dollars)

Planned Spending Actual Spending Difference (actual minus planned)
2,615,471 3,841,720 1,226,249

2015-16 Human Resources (FTEs)

Planned Actual Difference (actual minus planned)
Military – Regular Force 18 25 7
Civilian 5 2 (3)
TOTAL 23 27 4

Performance Results

Expected Results Performance Indicators Targets Actual Results
Awareness of the expected differences between the supply and demand for existing Defence capabilities is established for the near- and mid-term horizon. % score on the Strategic Force Posture Planning Support Evaluation Index. 81 - 100% 95%

Page details

Date modified: