STBBI prevention guide: Screening and diagnostic testing
This guide includes an overview of practices for the screening and diagnostic testing of sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI) by healthcare professionals practicing in public health or primary care settings.
On this page
Screening and diagnostic testing
STBBIs are frequently asymptomatic and can lead to serious complications if left undiagnosed or untreated. STBBI screening can raise awareness about signs and symptoms and provide an opportunity to discuss transmission and prevention measures. Screening increases the possibility of early detection and treatment, prevents or limits complications and lessens potential for transmission. Offer screening for STBBIs during routine care, with special attention to individuals who are more likely to be exposed. Age, gender, medical and sexual history as well as risk factors all inform the decision to screen. More frequent screening may be appropriate for individuals with ongoing risk factors. Screening for STBBIs can be normalized by using statements such as, “I always suggest testing for STBBIs. Are you okay with being tested?”
Many STBBIs have similar risk factors and transmission modes, and co-infection is common. If an STBBI is suspected, take the opportunity to screen for other STBBIs. Some STBBIs can cause inflammation, ulcers or both and increase the risk of HIV acquisition and transmission. Consult etiology specific guides for screening recommendations.
Clinical presentation and sexual and substance use history will help inform what specimens and samples to collect, from which anatomical sites (pharyngeal, genital, rectal) and the type of diagnostic tests. Depending on type of sexual activity, it may be necessary to collect specimens from multiple anatomical sites. Consult etiology specific guides or the STI-associated Syndromes guide for information on diagnostic tests.
Barriers to screening and testing
Underscreening for STBBIs results in missed opportunities to detect infection and thereby prevent transmission. There are several common STBBI screening barriers at the individual, healthcare and social level.
Individual barriers
- Underestimated personal risk
- Lack of awareness about STBBI screening and benefits
- Perception that STBBIs are minor health concerns
- Fear of invasive procedures such as urethral swabbing, speculum exam and venipuncture
- Self-consciousness about or previous negative experience with physical examination including genital, gynecological or rectal examination
- Shame, or internalized stigma about sexual or substance use practices
- Concerns around confidentiality
- Lack of access or poor connection to the health care system (e.g. men can be less likely to seek care)Footnote 1
- Fear of disclosing sexual orientation, gender identity or gender-affirming surgery
Healthcare barriers
- Attitudes and behaviours, which lead to stigmaFootnote 2Footnote 3
- Lack of confidence in taking a sexual history, screening, testing and treating STBBIs
- Topic avoidance
- Lack of time due to competing medical priorities
- Lack of knowledge, preparedness or discomfort in providing:
- Culturally safe care
- Trauma-informed care
- Care that recognizes syndemic conditions which place some populations at increased risk for STBBIFootnote 4Footnote 5Footnote 6Footnote 7Footnote 8
Social barriers
- Stigma
- Discrimination
- Lack of anonymity in smaller communities
Individuals may be more vulnerable to STBBI and more likely to experience barriers to screening and testing if they have experiencedFootnote 9:
- Stigma
- Exclusion
- Marginalization
- Mental health issues
- Discrimination based on race, immigration status, sexual orientation, gender identity or substance use
- Involvement in sex work
These barriers and STBBI-related stigma can be reduced by offering screening in a person-centred, culturally safe and trauma-informed manner, as part of routine care. Motivational interviewing techniques can be used to identify barriers and the means to overcome themFootnote 10.
The use of urine and other self-obtained specimens, like vaginal and rectal swabs, can increase acceptance of screening in persons reluctant to be examined. Self-testing (e.g., HIV self-testing) and point of care (POC) testing (where available) can also facilitate uptake of screening.
Additional resources
- Canada.ca
- Tips for STI screening, treatment and follow-up
- Chlamydia among young women: A resource for population-specific prevention
- HIV screening and testing guide
- Hepatitis C virus (HCV): Screening and testing for health professionals
- For health professionals: Hepatitis C
- Primary care management of Hepatitis B: Quick reference
- National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) Guide to Services
- Canada Communicable Disease Report (CCDR)
- Canadians are still reluctant to get tested for STBBI
- Barriers to and facilitators of hepatitis C virus screening and testing: A scoping review
- Understanding barriers and facilitators to HIV testing in Canada from 2009–2019: A systematic mixed studies review
- Resources to address stigma related to sexuality, substance use and sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections
- Saskatoon Tribal Council
- UNAIDS
- Trans Care BC, Provincial Health Services Authority
- Canadian Public Health Association
- Organizational assessment tool for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBIs) and stigma
- Reducing stigma and discrimination through the protection of privacy and confidentiality
- Self-assessment tool for STBBIs and stigma
- Trauma- and violence- informed care toolkit for reducing stigma related to STBBIs
References
- Footnote 1
-
Banks I. No man's land: Men, illness, and the NHS. BMJ. 2001;323(7320):1058-1060. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7320.1058 [doi].
- Footnote 2
-
Myles A. The role of physicians’ attitudes and the provision of hepatitis C virus treatment to people who inject drugs. Open Medicine Journal. 2016;3(1).
- Footnote 3
-
Wagner AC, Girard T, McShane KE, Margolese S, Hart TA. HIV-related stigma and overlapping stigmas towards people living with HIV among health care trainees in canada. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2017;29(4):364-376.
- Footnote 4
-
Gott M, Galena E, Hinchliff S, Elford H. “Opening a can of worms”: GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care. Fam Pract. 2004;21(5):528-536.
- Footnote 5
-
Fuzzell L, Fedesco HN, Alexander SC, Fortenberry JD, Shields CG. “I just think that doctors need to ask more questions”: Sexual minority and majority adolescents’ experiences talking about sexuality with healthcare providers. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(9):1467-1472.
- Footnote 6
-
Loeb DF, Lee RS, Binswanger IA, Ellison MC, Aagaard EM. Patient, resident physician, and visit factors associated with documentation of sexual history in the outpatient setting. Journal of general internal medicine. 2011;26(8):887-893.
- Footnote 7
-
Greenwood NW, Wilkinson J. Sexual and reproductive health care for women with intellectual disabilities: A primary care perspective. Int J Family Med. 2013;2013:642472. doi: 10.1155/2013/642472 [doi`].
- Footnote 8
-
White W, Brenman S, Paradis E, et al. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patient care: Medical students' preparedness and comfort. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(3):254-263.
- Footnote 9
-
Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada. A summary of the pan-canadian framework on sexually-transmitted and blood-borne infections. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2018;44(7/8):179-81.
- Footnote 10
-
Hall K, Gibbie T, Lubman DI. Motivational interviewing techniques: Facilitating behaviour change in the general practice setting. Aust Fam Physician. 2012;41(9):660.
Page details
- Date modified: