Mumps virus: Infectious substances pathogen safety data sheet
For more information on Mumps virus, see the following:
Section I – Infectious agent
Name
Mumps virus
Agent type
Virus
Taxonomy
Family
Paramyxoviridae
Genus
Orthorubulavirus
Species
Orthorubulavirus parotitidis
Synonym or cross-reference
Formerly known as mumps rubulavirus, mumps orthorubulavirus; etiological agent of mumpsFootnote 1. Mumps is also known as infectious parotitis or viral parotitisFootnote 2 Footnote 3.
Characteristics
Brief description
Mumps virus (MuV) virions are enveloped and have an irregular spherical shape, measuring 90 to 300 nm in diameterFootnote 4. The nucleocapsid has a helical structure. MuV has a single-stranded, negative-sense, linear RNA genome, approximately 15.3 kbp in size, with a G+C content of 42.3%Footnote 5 Footnote 6 Footnote 7.
Properties
There are 12 MuV genotypes (A to N, excluding E and M) classified based on the small hydrophobic protein sequenceFootnote 8Footnote 9. Fusion and hemagglutinin-neuraminidase proteins appear to be the major determinants of immunityFootnote 4Footnote 10. MuV can be grown in a variety of mammalian cell cultures and avian embryosFootnote 4. The life cycle of MuV includes the following key stages: initial infection, systemic spread, viral replication, and immune responseFootnote 5. MuV first binds to the host cell surface via the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein receptor, sialic acid, which mediates virus-to-cell fusion and cell-to-cell membrane fusion, facilitating virus spreadFootnote 5. In humans, MuV mainly replicates in upper respiratory mucosaFootnote 11.
Section II – Hazard identification
Pathogenicity and toxicity
Mumps is usually a self-limiting disease; approximately one-third to one-half of infections among unvaccinated individuals are asymptomatic or subclinical, whereas the frequency of asymptomatic infection among vaccinated individuals is unclearFootnote 12 Footnote 13 Footnote 14. Symptoms include fever, malaise, muscle pain, and headache; followed by swelling/tenderness of one or both parotid glands, which usually persists for one weekFootnote 3Footnote 15. Swelling of other salivary glands may occur in conjunction with parotitis in 10% of casesFootnote 4. Rare manifestations include meningitis (1-10%)Footnote 16, epididymo-orchitis (25% to 38% of post-pubertal males)Footnote 3Footnote 4, encephalitis (0.1%) with a mortality rate of 1.4%Footnote 4Footnote 17, oophoritis (5% of post-pubertal females)Footnote 18, transient high-frequency deafness (4%)Footnote 19, permanent deafness (<0.01%)Footnote 20, and pancreatitis (4%)Footnote 4Footnote 15. Joint, myocardial, and ocular involvement have also been reportedFootnote 3. Complications include sialectasia and pharyngolateral edemaFootnote 4Footnote 21. Neurologic syndromes infrequently associated with mumps include cerebellar ataxiaFootnote 22, facial palsyFootnote 23Footnote 24, transverse myelitisFootnote 25, Guillain-Barré syndromeFootnote 26Footnote 27, and poliomyelitis-like syndromeFootnote 28. Extremely rare conditions associated with mumps include nephritisFootnote 29, thyroiditisFootnote 30, and thrombocytopeniaFootnote 31. Other sequelae, including paralysis, seizures, cranial nerve palsies, and hydrocephalus have also been reported but are uncommonFootnote 5.
Epidemiology
Mumps is endemic worldwideFootnote 32. Since the introduction of MuV vaccine in the 1960s, annual incidence of mumps has declined markedly; however in recent decades, there has been a resurgence of mumps prevalenceFootnote 4Footnote 32. Incidence of mumps in Canada and the United States is estimated to be 0.1 cases per 100,000 persons per yearFootnote 32Footnote 33. From 2015 to 2022, an estimated 24,000 cases were reported to the World Health Organization from North AmericaFootnote 34. Sporadic outbreaks primarily affect individuals living in close proximity with extensive personal contact (e.g., college campuses, summer camps, sports teams)Footnote 35 Footnote 36 Footnote 37 Footnote 38. A large-scale outbreak occurred in northwest Arkansas in 2016-2017, comprising almost 3,000 cases and accounting for 41% of cases reported in the United States in 2016Footnote 39. Out of 2917 patients, 2014 (69%) had their mumps immunizations up to date. About 92% of impacted children aged 5-17 years also had their mumps immunizations up to dateFootnote 39. Many of the patients affected by mumps outbreaks in the United States, Europe, and Australia are young adults and older adolescents, aged 18-35, who had received two doses of MuV vaccineFootnote 33Footnote 37Footnote 40 Footnote 41Footnote 42 Footnote 43. This appears to be due in part to waning mumps-vaccine-conferred immunityFootnote 10Footnote 41. Risk and severity of complications with MuV increases with age, however, complications are less likely to occur in vaccinated individualsFootnote 10Footnote 42. Individuals living in close proximity with extensive personal contact to infected individuals are at high risk of infectionFootnote 35Footnote 36Footnote 37Footnote 38.
Host range
Natural host(s)
HumansFootnote 5.
Other host(s)
Non-human primates, mice, and hamsters have been experimentally infectedFootnote 44 Footnote 45Footnote 46 Footnote 47.
Infectious dose
Unknown.
Incubation period
The incubation period for MuV is usually 16 to 18 days, but can range from 12 to 25 days post-exposureFootnote 4Footnote 48. Virus shedding appears to be relatively low by 5 days after the onset of parotitisFootnote 49.
Communicability
Human-to-human transmission occurs via direct contact with secretions from infected individuals, inhalation of infectious aerosols, and contaminated fomitesFootnote 3Footnote 4. The preferred mode of transmission is direct contact with saliva or respiratory dropletsFootnote 50. Infected individuals are contagious from 48 hours before to 9 days after onset of parotitisFootnote 3Footnote 15Footnote 51. The estimated basic reproductive number (R0) of MuV, which represents the number of secondary cases generated by a primary case in an otherwise susceptible population, is 10-12Footnote 52.
Section III – Dissemination
Reservoir
HumansFootnote 5.
Zoonosis
None.
Vectors
None.
Section IV – Stability and viability
Drug susceptibility/resistance
No antivirals are currently available to treat MuV infection. Ribavirin has shown virostatic activity in vitroFootnote 53.
Susceptibility to disinfectants
MuV is sensitive to 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorine dioxide (ClO2) at a concentration of 1.0 mg/L for 30 minutes, 70% ethanol, and glutaraldehydeFootnote 54 Footnote 55.
Physical inactivation
MuV is inactivated by autoclave treatment with moist heat (121°C for 30 minutes)Footnote 55. An estimated disinfection rate of 97% has been reported from UV exposure at a mean dose of 45 J/m2 (unspecified time period)Footnote 55.
Survival outside host
MuV tends to remain infective for several hours in the external environment but can persist for days depending on environmental conditions such as temperature and humidityFootnote 56. MuV has been noted to remain stable at 4°C for days, although environmental conditions were not specifiedFootnote 15.
Section V – First aid/medical
Surveillance
Patients suspected of infection should be monitoredFootnote 4. Diagnosis is based on history of exposure and clinical symptoms such as parotid swelling/tendernessFootnote 4. MuV can be detected in clinical specimens, such as saliva or cerebrospinal fluid using viral isolation and reverse transcription followed by polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) Footnote 3Footnote 57Footnote 58.
Note: The specific recommendations for surveillance in the laboratory should come from the medical surveillance program, which is based on a local risk assessment of the pathogens and activities being undertaken, as well as an overarching risk assessment of the biosafety program as a whole. More information on medical surveillance is available in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.
First aid/treatment
Treatment is supportive and may include rest, increased fluid intake, analgesics and antipyretics (e.g., aspirin, acetaminophen) to reduce pain, inflammation and feverFootnote 3Footnote 4Footnote 59.
Note: The specific recommendations for first aid/treatment in the laboratory should come from the post-exposure response plan, which is developed as part of the medical surveillance program. More information on the post-exposure response plan can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.
Immunization
In Canada, mumps vaccine is available in combination with measles and rubella vaccine (MMR) or measles, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) vaccine. A two-dose regimen is recommended for children at 12-15 months and 4-6 years of ageFootnote 4. More than 120 countries include mumps vaccine as part of their national immunization programFootnote 60. Cofactors that may affect vaccination recommendations include pregnancy, immunocompromised status, and being born before 1970Footnote 61.
Note: More information on the medical surveillance program can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook, and by consulting the Canadian Immunization Guide.
Prophylaxis
A third dose of mumps-containing vaccine is recommended by some national public health institutes, including the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention, for individuals who are at increased risk of contracting mumps due to an ongoing outbreak, those born after 1970, or those travelling to susceptible areasFootnote 42Footnote 61Footnote 62.
Note: More information on prophylaxis as part of the medical surveillance program can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.
Section VI – Laboratory hazard
Laboratory-acquired infections
Only a few MuV-associated laboratory-acquired infections have been reportedFootnote 63Footnote 64. However, no information regarding the root cause or route of exposure is available.
Note: Please consult the Canadian Biosafety Standard and Canadian Biosafety Handbook for additional details on requirements for reporting exposure incidents.
Sources/specimens
MuV can be found in saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, blood, and throat swabsFootnote 3Footnote 16Footnote 65.
Primary hazards
Inhalation of aerosolized infectious material and direct contact with secretions from infected individuals are the primary hazards associated with exposure to MuVFootnote 66.
Special hazards
None.
Section VII – Exposure controls/personal protection
Risk group classification
Mumps virus is a Risk Group 2 Human Pathogen and a Risk Group 1 Animal PathogenFootnote 67 Footnote 68.
Containment requirements
Containment Level 2 facilities, equipment, and operational practices outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard for work involving infectious or potentially infectious materials, animals, or cultures.
Protective clothing
The applicable Containment Level 2 requirements for personal protective equipment and clothing outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard are to be followed. The personal protective equipment could include the use of a lab coat and dedicated footwear (e.g., boots, shoes) or additional protective footwear (e.g., boot or shoe covers) where floors may be contaminated (e.g., animal cubicles, PM rooms), gloves when direct skin contact with infected materials or animals is unavoidable, and eye protection where there is a known or potential risk of exposure to splashes.
Note: A local risk assessment will identify the appropriate hand, foot, head, body, eye/face, and respiratory protection, and the personal protective equipment requirements for the containment zone and work activities must be documented.
Other precautions
The aerosol transmission of MuV necessitates the use of a BSC or other primary containment device for activities with open vessel; centrifugation to be carried out in sealed safety cups or rotors that are unloaded using a mechanism that prevents their release. Respiratory protection to be considered when BSC or other primary containment devices cannot be used; inward airflow is required for work involving large animals or large scale activities.
Use of needles and syringes are to be strictly limited. Bending, shearing, re-capping, or removing needles from syringes to be avoided, and if necessary, performed only as specified in standard operating procedures (SOPs). Additional precautions are required for work involving animals or large-scale activities.
Additional information
For diagnostic laboratories handling primary specimens that may contain MuV, the following resources may be consulted:
Section VIII – Handling and storage
Spills
Allow aerosols to settle. While wearing personal protective equipment, gently cover the spill with absorbent paper towel and apply suitable disinfectant, starting at the perimeter and working towards the centre. Allow sufficient contact time before clean up (Canadian Biosafety Handbook).
Disposal
All materials/substances that have come in contact with the regulated materials to be completely decontaminated before they are removed from the containment zone or standard operating procedures (SOPs) to be in place to safely and securely move or transport waste out of the containment zone to a designated decontamination area or third party. This can be achieved by using decontamination technologies and processes that have been demonstrated to be effective against the regulated material, such as chemical disinfectants, autoclaving, irradiation, incineration, an effluent treatment system, or gaseous decontamination (Canadian Biosafety Handbook).
Storage
The applicable Containment Level 2 requirements for storage outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard are to be followed. Primary containers of regulated materials removed from the containment zone to be labelled, leakproof, impact resistant, and kept either in locked storage equipment or within an area with limited access.
Section IX – Regulatory and other information
Canadian regulatory information
Controlled activities with MuV require a Pathogen and Toxin licence issued by the Public Health Agency of Canada.
The following is a non-exhaustive list of applicable designations, regulations, or legislations:
- Human Pathogens and Toxins Act and Human Pathogens and Toxins Regulations
- Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act and Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations
- National Notifiable Disease (human)
Last file update
February 2024
Prepared by
Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada.
Disclaimer
The scientific information, opinions, and recommendations contained in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet have been developed based on or compiled from trusted sources available at the time of publication. Newly discovered hazards are frequent and this information may not be completely up to date. The Government of Canada accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, sufficiency, or reliability or for any loss or injury resulting from the use of the information.
Persons in Canada are responsible for complying with the relevant laws, including regulations, guidelines and standards applicable to the import, transport, and use of pathogens in Canada set by relevant regulatory authorities, including the Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment and Climate Change Canada, and Transport Canada. The risk classification and related regulatory requirements referenced in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet, such as those found in the Canadian Biosafety Standard, may be incomplete and are specific to the Canadian context. Other jurisdictions will have their own requirements.
Copyright © Public Health Agency of Canada, 2024, Canada
References
- Footnote 1
-
International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2024. Virus Taxonomy: 2022 Release. Available at https://ictv.global/taxonomy/taxondetails?taxnode_id=202301635&taxon_name=Orthorubulavirus%20parotitidis [Accessed on March 12, 2024]
- Footnote 2
-
Whyte, D., F. O'Dea, C. McDonnell, N. H. O'Connell, S. Callinan, E. Brosnan, J. Powell, R. Monahan, R. FitzGerald, M. Mannix, T. Greally, A. Dee, and P. O'Sullivan. 2009. Mumps epidemiology in the mid-west of Ireland 2004-2008: increasing disease burden in the university/college setting. Euro Surveill. 14:.
- Footnote 3
-
Fort, G. G. 2019. Mumps, p. 920.e5. F. F. Ferri (ed.), Ferri's Clinical Advisor 2019. Elsevier.
- Footnote 4
-
Litman, N., and S. G. Baum. 2015. Mumps virus, p. 1942. J. E. Bennett, R. Dolin, and M. J. Blaser (eds.), Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 8th ed., Elsevier.
- Footnote 5
-
Rubin, S., M. Eckhaus, L. J. Rennick, C. G. Bamford, and W. P. Duprex. 2015. Molecular biology, pathogenesis and pathology of mumps virus. J. Pathol. 235:242-252.
- Footnote 6
-
Almansour, I. 2020. Mumps Vaccines: Current Challenges and Future Prospects. Front. Microbiol. 11:1999.
- Footnote 7
-
Frost, J. R., and A. Severini. 2022. Complete Genome Sequence of the World Health Organization Mumps Reference Strain, MuVi/Sheffield.GBR/1.05. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 11:e0033622.
- Footnote 8
-
Jin, L., C. Orvell, R. Myers, P. A. Rota, T. Nakayama, D. Forcic, J. Hiebert, and K. E. Brown. 2015. Genomic diversity of mumps virus and global distribution of the 12 genotypes. Rev. Med. Virol. 25:85-101.
- Footnote 9
-
World Health Organization. 2012. Mumps virus nomenclature update: 2012. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 22:217.
- Footnote 10
-
Beleni, A. I., and S. Borgmann. 2018. Mumps in the Vaccination Age: Global Epidemiology and the Situation in Germany. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 15:10.3390/ijerph15081618.
- Footnote 11
-
Okajima, K., K. Iseki, S. Koyano, A. Kato, and H. Azuma. 2013. Virological analysis of a regional mumps outbreak in the northern island of Japan-mumps virus genotyping and clinical description. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 66:561-563.
- Footnote 12
-
Tang, J. W., Y. Li, I. Eames, P. K. Chan, and G. L. Ridgway. 2006. Factors involved in the aerosol transmission of infection and control of ventilation in healthcare premises. J. Hosp. Infect. 64:100-114
- Footnote 13
-
Rubin, S., M. Eckhaus, L. J. Rennick, C. G. Bamford, and W. P. Duprex. 2015. Molecular biology, pathogenesis and pathology of mumps virus. J. Pathol. 235:242-252.
- Footnote 14
-
CDC. 2022. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-manual/chpt09-mumps.html
- Footnote 15
-
Hviid, A., S. Rubin, and K. Muhlemann. 2008. Mumps. Lancet. 371:932-944.
- Footnote 16
-
McLean, D. M., R. D. Bach, R. P. Larke, and G. A. McNaughton. 1964. Mumps Meningoencephalitis, Toronto, 1963. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 90:458-462.
- Footnote 17
-
Russell, R. R., and J. C. Donald. 1958. The neurological complications of mumps. Br. Med. J. 2:27-30.
- Footnote 18
-
Morrison, J. C., J. R. Givens, W. L. Wiser, and S. A. Fish. 1975. Mumps oophoritis: a cause of premature menopause. Fertil. Steril. 26:655-659.
- Footnote 19
-
Vuori, M., E. A. Lahikainen, and T. Peltonen. 1962. Perceptive deafness in connection with mumps. A study of 298 servicemen suffering from mumps. Acta Otolaryngol. 55:231-236.
- Footnote 20
-
Everberg, G. 1957. Deafness following mumps. Acta Otolaryngol. 48:397-403.
- Footnote 21
-
Ohki, M., Y. Baba, S. Kikuchi, A. Ohata, T. Tsutsumi, S. Tanaka, A. Tahara, S. Urata, and J. Ishikawa. 2015. Potentially lethal pharyngolaryngeal edema with dyspnea in adult patients with mumps: A series of 5 cases. Ear Nose Throat J. 94:184-186.
- Footnote 22
-
Cohen, H. A., A. Ashkenazi, M. Nussinovitch, J. Amir, J. Hart, and M. Frydman. 1992. Mumps-associated acute cerebellar ataxia. Am. J. Dis. Child. 146:930-931.
- Footnote 23
-
Beardwell, A. 1969. Facial palsy due to the mumps virus. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 23:37-38.
- Footnote 24
-
Incecik, F., M. O. Herguner, and S. Altunbasak. 2009. Facial palsy caused by mumps parotitis. Neurol. India. 57:511-512.
- Footnote 25
-
Nussinovitch, M., N. Brand, M. Frydman, and I. Varsano. 1992. Transverse myelitis following mumps in children. Acta Paediatr. 81:183-184.
- Footnote 26
-
Ghosh, S. 1967. Guillain-Barre syndrome complicating mumps. Lancet. 1:895.
- Footnote 27
-
Duncan, S., R. G. Will, and J. Catnach. 1990. Mumps and Guillain-Barré syndrome. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 53:709.
- Footnote 28
-
Lennette, E. H., G. E. Caplan, and R. L. Magoffin. 1960. Mumps virus infection simulating paralytic poliomyelitis. A report of 11 cases. Pediatrics. 25:788-797.
- Footnote 29
-
Hughes, W. T., A. J. Steigman, and H. F. Delong. 1966. Some implications of fatal nephritis associated with mumps. Am. J. Dis. Child. 111:297-301.
- Footnote 30
-
Eylan, E., R. Zmucky, and C. Sheba. 1957. Mumps virus and subacute thyroiditis; evidence of a causal association. Lancet. 272:1062-1063.
- Footnote 31
-
Graham, D. Y., C. H. Brown 3rd, J. Benrey, and J. S. Butel. 1974. Thrombocytopenia. A complication of mumps. JAMA. 227:1162-1164.
- Footnote 32
-
L'Huillier, A. G., A. Eshaghi, C. S. Racey, K. Ogbulafor, E. Lombos, R. R. Higgins, D. C. Alexander, E. Kristjanson, J. Maregmen, J. B. Gubbay, and T. Mazzulli. 2018. Laboratory testing and phylogenetic analysis during a mumps outbreak in Ontario, Canada. Virol. J. 15:98-018-0996-5. eCollection 2018.
- Footnote 33
-
Dayan, G. H., M. P. Quinlisk, A. A. Parker, A. E. Barskey, M. L. Harris, J. M. Schwartz, K. Hunt, C. G. Finley, D. P. Leschinsky, A. L. O'Keefe, J. Clayton, L. K. Kightlinger, E. G. Dietle, J. Berg, C. L. Kenyon, S. T. Goldstein, S. K. Stokley, S. B. Redd, P. A. Rota, J. Rota, D. Bi, S. W. Roush, C. B. Bridges, T. A. Santibanez, U. Parashar, W. J. Bellini, and J. F. Seward. 2008. Recent resurgence of mumps in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 358:1580-1589.
- Footnote 34
-
World Health Organization. 2023. Mumps - Reported cases by country. 2024.
- Footnote 35
-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2013. 1 March News. Mumps Outbreak on a University Campus - California, 2011. Clin Infect Dis. 56:i-ii.
- Footnote 36
-
Marin, M., P. Quinlisk, T. Shimabukuro, C. Sawhney, C. Brown, and C. W. Lebaron. 2008. Mumps vaccination coverage and vaccine effectiveness in a large outbreak among college students--Iowa, 2006. Vaccine. 26:3601-3607.
- Footnote 37
-
Dyer, O. 2017. Mumps epidemic in North America proves unusually stubborn. BMJ. 359:j5305.
- Footnote 38
-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2006. Mumps Outbreak at a Summer Camp—New York, 2005. JAMA. 295:1637-1638.
- Footnote 39
-
Fields V.S., Safi H., Waters C., Dillaha J., Capelle L., Riklon S., Wheeler J.G., and Haselow D.T. 2019. Mumps in a highly vaccinated Marshallese community in Arkansas, USA: an outbreak report. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19:185-192.
- Footnote 40
-
Marshall, H. S., and S. Plotkin. 2019. The changing epidemiology of mumps in a high vaccination era. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19:118-119.
- Footnote 41
-
Lopez-Perea, N., J. Masa-Calles, M. V. Torres de Mier, A. Fernandez-Garcia, J. E. Echevarria, F. De Ory, and M. V. Martinez de Aragon. 2017. Shift within age-groups of mumps incidence, hospitalizations and severe complications in a highly vaccinated population. Spain, 1998-2014. Vaccine. 35:4339-4345.
- Footnote 42
-
Vygen, S., A. Fischer, L. Meurice, I. Mounchetrou Njoya, M. Gregoris, B. Ndiaye, A. Ghenassia, I. Poujol, J. P. Stahl, D. Antona, Y. Le Strat, D. Levy-Bruhl, and P. Rolland. 2016. Waning immunity against mumps in vaccinated young adults, France 2013. Euro Surveill. 21:30156-7917.ES.2016.21.10.30156.
- Footnote 43
-
Su, S. B., H. L. Chang, and A. K. Chen. 2020. Current Status of Mumps Virus Infection: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Vaccine. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17:1686.
- Footnote 44
-
Pickar, A., P. Xu, A. Elson, J. Zengel, C. Sauder, S. Rubin, and B. He. 2017. Establishing a small animal model for evaluating protective immunity against mumps virus. PLoS One. 12:e0174444.
- Footnote 45
-
Johnson, C. D., and E. W. Goodpasture. 1934. An Investigation of the Etiology of Mumps. J. Exp. Med. 59:1-19.
- Footnote 46
-
Saika, S., M. Kidokoro, T. Ohkawa, A. Aoki, and K. Suzuki. 2002. Pathogenicity of mumps virus in the marmoset. J. Med. Virol. 66:115-122.
- Footnote 47
-
Wolinsky, J. S., and W. G. Stroop. 1978. Virulence and persistence of three prototype strains of mumps virus in newborn hamsters. Arch. Virol. 57:355-359.
- Footnote 48
-
Latner, D. R., and C. J. Hickman. 2015. Remembering mumps. PLoS Pathog. 11:e1004791.
- Footnote 49
-
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2009. Updated Recommendations for Isolation of Persons With Mumps. JAMA. 301:1648-1649.
- Footnote 50
-
Lam, E., Rosen, J. B., and Zucker, J. R. 2020. Mumps: an Update on Outbreaks, Vaccine Efficacy, and Genomic Diversity. Clin Microbiol Rev 33:e00151-19.
- Footnote 51
-
Polgreen, P. M., L. C. Bohnett, J. E. Cavanaugh, S. B. Gingerich, L. E. Desjardin, M. L. Harris, M. P. Quinlisk, and M. A. Pentella. 2008. The duration of mumps virus shedding after the onset of symptoms. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:1447-1449.
- Footnote 52
-
Tang, J. W., Y. Li, I. Eames, P. K. Chan, and G. L. Ridgway. 2006. Factors involved in the aerosol transmission of infection and control of ventilation in healthcare premises. J. Hosp. Infect. 64:100-114.
- Footnote 53
-
McCammon, J. R., and V. W. Riesser. 1979. Effects of ribavirin on BHK-21 cells acutely or persistently infected with mumps virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 15:356-360.
- Footnote 54
-
Junli, H., W. Li, R. Nenqi, L. X. Li, S. R. Fun, and Y. Guanle. 1997. Disinfection effect of chlorine dioxide on viruses, algae and animal planktons in water. Water Research. 31:455-460.
- Footnote 55
-
Kowalski, W. 2012. Disinfection of the Inanimate Environment, p. 139. W. Kowalski (ed.), Hospital Airborne Infection Control. CRC Press.
- Footnote 56
-
Walther, B. A., and P. W. Ewald. 2004. Pathogen survival in the external environment and the evolution of virulence. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 79:849-869.
- Footnote 57
-
Cusi, M. G., S. Bianchi, M. Valassina, L. Santini, M. Arnetoli, and P. E. Valensin. 1996. Rapid detection and typing of circulating mumps virus by reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction. Res. Virol. 147:227-232.
- Footnote 58
-
Poggio, G. P., C. Rodriguez, D. Cisterna, M. C. Freire, and J. Cello. 2000. Nested PCR for rapid detection of mumps virus in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with neurological diseases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:274-278.
- Footnote 59
-
Barbel, P., K. Peterson, and E. Heavey. 2017. Mumps makes a comeback: What nurses need to know. Nursing. 47:15-17.
- Footnote 60
-
World Health Organization. 2018. Immunization coverage. 2019.
- Footnote 61
-
Government of Canada. Aug 2021. Mumps vaccines : Canadian Immunization Guide. Feb 2024
- Footnote 62
-
Marin, M., M. Marlow, K. L. Moore, and M. Patel. 2018. Recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Use of a Third Dose of Mumps Virus-Containing Vaccine in Persons at Increased Risk for Mumps During an Outbreak. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 67:33.
- Footnote 63
-
Sewell, D. L. 1995. Laboratory-associated infections and biosafety. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:389-405.
- Footnote 64
-
Wedum, A. G. 1997. History & Epidemiology of Laboratory-Acquired Infections. J Am Biol Saf Assoc. 2:12.
- Footnote 65
-
Overman, J. R. 1958. Viremia in human mumps virus infections. AMA Arch. Intern. Med. 102:354.
- Footnote 66
-
Tellier, R. 2006. Review of Aerosol Transmission of Influenza A Virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:1657-1662.
- Footnote 67
-
Government of Canada. 2018. ePATHogen - Risk Group Database. 2024. Available at https://health.canada.ca/en/epathogen.
- Footnote 68
-
Public Health Agency of Canada. 2018. Human Pathogens and Toxins Act (HPTA) (S.C. 2009, c.24).
Page details
- Date modified: