Mumps virus: Infectious substances pathogen safety data sheet

For more information on Mumps virus, see the following:

Section I – Infectious agent

Name

Mumps virus

Agent type

Virus

Taxonomy

Family

Paramyxoviridae

Genus

Orthorubulavirus

Species

Orthorubulavirus parotitidis

Synonym or cross-reference

Formerly known as mumps rubulavirus, mumps orthorubulavirus; etiological agent of mumpsFootnote 1. Mumps is also known as infectious parotitis or viral parotitisFootnote 2 Footnote 3.

Characteristics

Brief description

Mumps virus (MuV) virions are enveloped and have an irregular spherical shape, measuring 90 to 300 nm in diameterFootnote 4. The nucleocapsid has a helical structure. MuV has a single-stranded, negative-sense, linear RNA genome, approximately 15.3 kbp in size, with a G+C content of 42.3%Footnote 5 Footnote 6 Footnote 7.

Properties

There are 12 MuV genotypes (A to N, excluding E and M) classified based on the small hydrophobic protein sequenceFootnote 8Footnote 9. Fusion and hemagglutinin-neuraminidase proteins appear to be the major determinants of immunityFootnote 4Footnote 10. MuV can be grown in a variety of mammalian cell cultures and avian embryosFootnote 4. The life cycle of MuV includes the following key stages: initial infection, systemic spread, viral replication, and immune responseFootnote 5. MuV first binds to the host cell surface via the hemagglutinin-neuraminidase glycoprotein receptor, sialic acid, which mediates virus-to-cell fusion and cell-to-cell membrane fusion, facilitating virus spreadFootnote 5. In humans, MuV mainly replicates in upper respiratory mucosaFootnote 11.

Section II – Hazard identification

Pathogenicity and toxicity

Mumps is usually a self-limiting disease; approximately one-third to one-half of infections among unvaccinated individuals are asymptomatic or subclinical, whereas the frequency of asymptomatic infection among vaccinated individuals is unclearFootnote 12 Footnote 13 Footnote 14. Symptoms include fever, malaise, muscle pain, and headache; followed by swelling/tenderness of one or both parotid glands, which usually persists for one weekFootnote 3Footnote 15. Swelling of other salivary glands may occur in conjunction with parotitis in 10% of casesFootnote 4. Rare manifestations include meningitis (1-10%)Footnote 16, epididymo-orchitis (25% to 38% of post-pubertal males)Footnote 3Footnote 4, encephalitis (0.1%) with a mortality rate of 1.4%Footnote 4Footnote 17, oophoritis (5% of post-pubertal females)Footnote 18, transient high-frequency deafness (4%)Footnote 19, permanent deafness (<0.01%)Footnote 20, and pancreatitis (4%)Footnote 4Footnote 15. Joint, myocardial, and ocular involvement have also been reportedFootnote 3. Complications include sialectasia and pharyngolateral edemaFootnote 4Footnote 21. Neurologic syndromes infrequently associated with mumps include cerebellar ataxiaFootnote 22, facial palsyFootnote 23Footnote 24, transverse myelitisFootnote 25, Guillain-Barré syndromeFootnote 26Footnote 27, and poliomyelitis-like syndromeFootnote 28. Extremely rare conditions associated with mumps include nephritisFootnote 29, thyroiditisFootnote 30, and thrombocytopeniaFootnote 31. Other sequelae, including paralysis, seizures, cranial nerve palsies, and hydrocephalus have also been reported but are uncommonFootnote 5.

Epidemiology

Mumps is endemic worldwideFootnote 32. Since the introduction of MuV vaccine in the 1960s, annual incidence of mumps has declined markedly; however in recent decades, there has been a resurgence of mumps prevalenceFootnote 4Footnote 32. Incidence of mumps in Canada and the United States is estimated to be 0.1 cases per 100,000 persons per yearFootnote 32Footnote 33. From 2015 to 2022, an estimated 24,000 cases were reported to the World Health Organization from North AmericaFootnote 34. Sporadic outbreaks primarily affect individuals living in close proximity with extensive personal contact (e.g., college campuses, summer camps, sports teams)Footnote 35 Footnote 36 Footnote 37 Footnote 38. A large-scale outbreak occurred in northwest Arkansas in 2016-2017, comprising almost 3,000 cases and accounting for 41% of cases reported in the United States in 2016Footnote 39. Out of 2917 patients, 2014 (69%) had their mumps immunizations up to date. About 92% of impacted children aged 5-17 years also had their mumps immunizations up to dateFootnote 39. Many of the patients affected by mumps outbreaks in the United States, Europe, and Australia are young adults and older adolescents, aged 18-35, who had received two doses of MuV vaccineFootnote 33Footnote 37Footnote 40 Footnote 41Footnote 42 Footnote 43. This appears to be due in part to waning mumps-vaccine-conferred immunityFootnote 10Footnote 41. Risk and severity of complications with MuV increases with age, however, complications are less likely to occur in vaccinated individualsFootnote 10Footnote 42. Individuals living in close proximity with extensive personal contact to infected individuals are at high risk of infectionFootnote 35Footnote 36Footnote 37Footnote 38.

Host range

Natural host(s)

HumansFootnote 5.

Other host(s)

Non-human primates, mice, and hamsters have been experimentally infectedFootnote 44 Footnote 45Footnote 46 Footnote 47.

Infectious dose

Unknown.

Incubation period

The incubation period for MuV is usually 16 to 18 days, but can range from 12 to 25 days post-exposureFootnote 4Footnote 48. Virus shedding appears to be relatively low by 5 days after the onset of parotitisFootnote 49.

Communicability

Human-to-human transmission occurs via direct contact with secretions from infected individuals, inhalation of infectious aerosols, and contaminated fomitesFootnote 3Footnote 4. The preferred mode of transmission is direct contact with saliva or respiratory dropletsFootnote 50. Infected individuals are contagious from 48 hours before to 9 days after onset of parotitisFootnote 3Footnote 15Footnote 51. The estimated basic reproductive number (R0) of MuV, which represents the number of secondary cases generated by a primary case in an otherwise susceptible population, is 10-12Footnote 52.

Section III – Dissemination

Reservoir

HumansFootnote 5.

Zoonosis

None.

Vectors

None.

Section IV – Stability and viability

Drug susceptibility/resistance

No antivirals are currently available to treat MuV infection. Ribavirin has shown virostatic activity in vitroFootnote 53.

Susceptibility to disinfectants

MuV is sensitive to 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), chlorine dioxide (ClO2) at a concentration of 1.0 mg/L for 30 minutes, 70% ethanol, and glutaraldehydeFootnote 54 Footnote 55.

Physical inactivation

MuV is inactivated by autoclave treatment with moist heat (121°C for 30 minutes)Footnote 55. An estimated disinfection rate of 97% has been reported from UV exposure at a mean dose of 45 J/m2 (unspecified time period)Footnote 55.

Survival outside host

MuV tends to remain infective for several hours in the external environment but can persist for days depending on environmental conditions such as temperature and humidityFootnote 56. MuV has been noted to remain stable at 4°C for days, although environmental conditions were not specifiedFootnote 15.

Section V – First aid/medical

Surveillance

Patients suspected of infection should be monitoredFootnote 4. Diagnosis is based on history of exposure and clinical symptoms such as parotid swelling/tendernessFootnote 4. MuV can be detected in clinical specimens, such as saliva or cerebrospinal fluid using viral isolation and reverse transcription followed by polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) Footnote 3Footnote 57Footnote 58.

Note: The specific recommendations for surveillance in the laboratory should come from the medical surveillance program, which is based on a local risk assessment of the pathogens and activities being undertaken, as well as an overarching risk assessment of the biosafety program as a whole. More information on medical surveillance is available in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.

First aid/treatment

Treatment is supportive and may include rest, increased fluid intake, analgesics and antipyretics (e.g., aspirin, acetaminophen) to reduce pain, inflammation and feverFootnote 3Footnote 4Footnote 59.

Note: The specific recommendations for first aid/treatment in the laboratory should come from the post-exposure response plan, which is developed as part of the medical surveillance program. More information on the post-exposure response plan can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.

Immunization

In Canada, mumps vaccine is available in combination with measles and rubella vaccine (MMR) or measles, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) vaccine. A two-dose regimen is recommended for children at 12-15 months and 4-6 years of ageFootnote 4. More than 120 countries include mumps vaccine as part of their national immunization programFootnote 60. Cofactors that may affect vaccination recommendations include pregnancy, immunocompromised status, and being born before 1970Footnote 61.

Note: More information on the medical surveillance program can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook, and by consulting the Canadian Immunization Guide.

Prophylaxis

A third dose of mumps-containing vaccine is recommended by some national public health institutes, including the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention, for individuals who are at increased risk of contracting mumps due to an ongoing outbreak, those born after 1970, or those travelling to susceptible areasFootnote 42Footnote 61Footnote 62.

Note: More information on prophylaxis as part of the medical surveillance program can be found in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook.

Section VI – Laboratory hazard

Laboratory-acquired infections

Only a few MuV-associated laboratory-acquired infections have been reportedFootnote 63Footnote 64. However, no information regarding the root cause or route of exposure is available.

Note: Please consult the Canadian Biosafety Standard and Canadian Biosafety Handbook for additional details on requirements for reporting exposure incidents.

Sources/specimens

MuV can be found in saliva, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, blood, and throat swabsFootnote 3Footnote 16Footnote 65.

Primary hazards

Inhalation of aerosolized infectious material and direct contact with secretions from infected individuals are the primary hazards associated with exposure to MuVFootnote 66.

Special hazards

None.

Section VII – Exposure controls/personal protection

Risk group classification

Mumps virus is a Risk Group 2 Human Pathogen and a Risk Group 1 Animal PathogenFootnote 67 Footnote 68.

Containment requirements

Containment Level 2 facilities, equipment, and operational practices outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard for work involving infectious or potentially infectious materials, animals, or cultures.

Protective clothing

The applicable Containment Level 2 requirements for personal protective equipment and clothing outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard are to be followed. The personal protective equipment could include the use of a lab coat and dedicated footwear (e.g., boots, shoes) or additional protective footwear (e.g., boot or shoe covers) where floors may be contaminated (e.g., animal cubicles, PM rooms), gloves when direct skin contact with infected materials or animals is unavoidable, and eye protection where there is a known or potential risk of exposure to splashes.

Note: A local risk assessment will identify the appropriate hand, foot, head, body, eye/face, and respiratory protection, and the personal protective equipment requirements for the containment zone and work activities must be documented.

Other precautions

The aerosol transmission of MuV necessitates the use of a BSC or other primary containment device for activities with open vessel; centrifugation to be carried out in sealed safety cups or rotors that are unloaded using a mechanism that prevents their release. Respiratory protection to be considered when BSC or other primary containment devices cannot be used; inward airflow is required for work involving large animals or large scale activities.

Use of needles and syringes are to be strictly limited. Bending, shearing, re-capping, or removing needles from syringes to be avoided, and if necessary, performed only as specified in standard operating procedures (SOPs). Additional precautions are required for work involving animals or large-scale activities.

Additional information

For diagnostic laboratories handling primary specimens that may contain MuV, the following resources may be consulted:

Section VIII – Handling and storage

Spills

Allow aerosols to settle. While wearing personal protective equipment, gently cover the spill with absorbent paper towel and apply suitable disinfectant, starting at the perimeter and working towards the centre. Allow sufficient contact time before clean up (Canadian Biosafety Handbook).

Disposal

All materials/substances that have come in contact with the regulated materials to be completely decontaminated before they are removed from the containment zone or standard operating procedures (SOPs) to be in place to safely and securely move or transport waste out of the containment zone to a designated decontamination area or third party. This can be achieved by using decontamination technologies and processes that have been demonstrated to be effective against the regulated material, such as chemical disinfectants, autoclaving, irradiation, incineration, an effluent treatment system, or gaseous decontamination (Canadian Biosafety Handbook).

Storage

The applicable Containment Level 2 requirements for storage outlined in the Canadian Biosafety Standard are to be followed. Primary containers of regulated materials removed from the containment zone to be labelled, leakproof, impact resistant, and kept either in locked storage equipment or within an area with limited access.

Section IX – Regulatory and other information

Canadian regulatory information

Controlled activities with MuV require a Pathogen and Toxin licence issued by the Public Health Agency of Canada.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of applicable designations, regulations, or legislations:

Last file update

February 2024

Prepared by

Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada.

Disclaimer

The scientific information, opinions, and recommendations contained in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet have been developed based on or compiled from trusted sources available at the time of publication. Newly discovered hazards are frequent and this information may not be completely up to date. The Government of Canada accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, sufficiency, or reliability or for any loss or injury resulting from the use of the information.

Persons in Canada are responsible for complying with the relevant laws, including regulations, guidelines and standards applicable to the import, transport, and use of pathogens in Canada set by relevant regulatory authorities, including the Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment and Climate Change Canada, and Transport Canada. The risk classification and related regulatory requirements referenced in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet, such as those found in the Canadian Biosafety Standard, may be incomplete and are specific to the Canadian context. Other jurisdictions will have their own requirements.

Copyright © Public Health Agency of Canada, 2024, Canada

References

Footnote 1

International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. 2024. Virus Taxonomy: 2022 Release. Available at https://ictv.global/taxonomy/taxondetails?taxnode_id=202301635&taxon_name=Orthorubulavirus%20parotitidis [Accessed on March 12, 2024]

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Whyte, D., F. O'Dea, C. McDonnell, N. H. O'Connell, S. Callinan, E. Brosnan, J. Powell, R. Monahan, R. FitzGerald, M. Mannix, T. Greally, A. Dee, and P. O'Sullivan. 2009. Mumps epidemiology in the mid-west of Ireland 2004-2008: increasing disease burden in the university/college setting. Euro Surveill. 14:.

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Fort, G. G. 2019. Mumps, p. 920.e5. F. F. Ferri (ed.), Ferri's Clinical Advisor 2019. Elsevier.

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Footnote 4

Litman, N., and S. G. Baum. 2015. Mumps virus, p. 1942. J. E. Bennett, R. Dolin, and M. J. Blaser (eds.), Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 8th ed., Elsevier.

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Footnote 5

Rubin, S., M. Eckhaus, L. J. Rennick, C. G. Bamford, and W. P. Duprex. 2015. Molecular biology, pathogenesis and pathology of mumps virus. J. Pathol. 235:242-252.

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Footnote 6

Almansour, I. 2020. Mumps Vaccines: Current Challenges and Future Prospects. Front. Microbiol. 11:1999.

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Footnote 7

Frost, J. R., and A. Severini. 2022. Complete Genome Sequence of the World Health Organization Mumps Reference Strain, MuVi/Sheffield.GBR/1.05. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 11:e0033622.

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Footnote 8

Jin, L., C. Orvell, R. Myers, P. A. Rota, T. Nakayama, D. Forcic, J. Hiebert, and K. E. Brown. 2015. Genomic diversity of mumps virus and global distribution of the 12 genotypes. Rev. Med. Virol. 25:85-101.

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Footnote 9

World Health Organization. 2012. Mumps virus nomenclature update: 2012. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 22:217.

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

Beleni, A. I., and S. Borgmann. 2018. Mumps in the Vaccination Age: Global Epidemiology and the Situation in Germany. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 15:10.3390/ijerph15081618.

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

Okajima, K., K. Iseki, S. Koyano, A. Kato, and H. Azuma. 2013. Virological analysis of a regional mumps outbreak in the northern island of Japan-mumps virus genotyping and clinical description. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 66:561-563.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

Tang, J. W., Y. Li, I. Eames, P. K. Chan, and G. L. Ridgway. 2006. Factors involved in the aerosol transmission of infection and control of ventilation in healthcare premises. J. Hosp. Infect. 64:100-114

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

Rubin, S., M. Eckhaus, L. J. Rennick, C. G. Bamford, and W. P. Duprex. 2015. Molecular biology, pathogenesis and pathology of mumps virus. J. Pathol. 235:242-252.

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Footnote 14

CDC. 2022. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-manual/chpt09-mumps.html

Return to footnote 14 referrer

Footnote 15

Hviid, A., S. Rubin, and K. Muhlemann. 2008. Mumps. Lancet. 371:932-944.

Return to footnote 15 referrer

Footnote 16

McLean, D. M., R. D. Bach, R. P. Larke, and G. A. McNaughton. 1964. Mumps Meningoencephalitis, Toronto, 1963. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 90:458-462.

Return to footnote 16 referrer

Footnote 17

Russell, R. R., and J. C. Donald. 1958. The neurological complications of mumps. Br. Med. J. 2:27-30.

Return to footnote 17 referrer

Footnote 18

Morrison, J. C., J. R. Givens, W. L. Wiser, and S. A. Fish. 1975. Mumps oophoritis: a cause of premature menopause. Fertil. Steril. 26:655-659.

Return to footnote 18 referrer

Footnote 19

Vuori, M., E. A. Lahikainen, and T. Peltonen. 1962. Perceptive deafness in connection with mumps. A study of 298 servicemen suffering from mumps. Acta Otolaryngol. 55:231-236.

Return to footnote 19 referrer

Footnote 20

Everberg, G. 1957. Deafness following mumps. Acta Otolaryngol. 48:397-403.

Return to footnote 20 referrer

Footnote 21

Ohki, M., Y. Baba, S. Kikuchi, A. Ohata, T. Tsutsumi, S. Tanaka, A. Tahara, S. Urata, and J. Ishikawa. 2015. Potentially lethal pharyngolaryngeal edema with dyspnea in adult patients with mumps: A series of 5 cases. Ear Nose Throat J. 94:184-186.

Return to footnote 21 referrer

Footnote 22

Cohen, H. A., A. Ashkenazi, M. Nussinovitch, J. Amir, J. Hart, and M. Frydman. 1992. Mumps-associated acute cerebellar ataxia. Am. J. Dis. Child. 146:930-931.

Return to footnote 22 referrer

Footnote 23

Beardwell, A. 1969. Facial palsy due to the mumps virus. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 23:37-38.

Return to footnote 23 referrer

Footnote 24

Incecik, F., M. O. Herguner, and S. Altunbasak. 2009. Facial palsy caused by mumps parotitis. Neurol. India. 57:511-512.

Return to footnote 24 referrer

Footnote 25

Nussinovitch, M., N. Brand, M. Frydman, and I. Varsano. 1992. Transverse myelitis following mumps in children. Acta Paediatr. 81:183-184.

Return to footnote 25 referrer

Footnote 26

Ghosh, S. 1967. Guillain-Barre syndrome complicating mumps. Lancet. 1:895.

Return to footnote 26 referrer

Footnote 27

Duncan, S., R. G. Will, and J. Catnach. 1990. Mumps and Guillain-Barré syndrome. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 53:709.

Return to footnote 27 referrer

Footnote 28

Lennette, E. H., G. E. Caplan, and R. L. Magoffin. 1960. Mumps virus infection simulating paralytic poliomyelitis. A report of 11 cases. Pediatrics. 25:788-797.

Return to footnote 28 referrer

Footnote 29

Hughes, W. T., A. J. Steigman, and H. F. Delong. 1966. Some implications of fatal nephritis associated with mumps. Am. J. Dis. Child. 111:297-301.

Return to footnote 29 referrer

Footnote 30

Eylan, E., R. Zmucky, and C. Sheba. 1957. Mumps virus and subacute thyroiditis; evidence of a causal association. Lancet. 272:1062-1063.

Return to footnote 30 referrer

Footnote 31

Graham, D. Y., C. H. Brown 3rd, J. Benrey, and J. S. Butel. 1974. Thrombocytopenia. A complication of mumps. JAMA. 227:1162-1164.

Return to footnote 31 referrer

Footnote 32

L'Huillier, A. G., A. Eshaghi, C. S. Racey, K. Ogbulafor, E. Lombos, R. R. Higgins, D. C. Alexander, E. Kristjanson, J. Maregmen, J. B. Gubbay, and T. Mazzulli. 2018. Laboratory testing and phylogenetic analysis during a mumps outbreak in Ontario, Canada. Virol. J. 15:98-018-0996-5. eCollection 2018.

Return to footnote 32 referrer

Footnote 33

Dayan, G. H., M. P. Quinlisk, A. A. Parker, A. E. Barskey, M. L. Harris, J. M. Schwartz, K. Hunt, C. G. Finley, D. P. Leschinsky, A. L. O'Keefe, J. Clayton, L. K. Kightlinger, E. G. Dietle, J. Berg, C. L. Kenyon, S. T. Goldstein, S. K. Stokley, S. B. Redd, P. A. Rota, J. Rota, D. Bi, S. W. Roush, C. B. Bridges, T. A. Santibanez, U. Parashar, W. J. Bellini, and J. F. Seward. 2008. Recent resurgence of mumps in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 358:1580-1589.

Return to footnote 33 referrer

Footnote 34

World Health Organization. 2023. Mumps - Reported cases by country. 2024.

Return to footnote 34 referrer

Footnote 35

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2013. 1 March News. Mumps Outbreak on a University Campus - California, 2011. Clin Infect Dis. 56:i-ii.

Return to footnote 35 referrer

Footnote 36

Marin, M., P. Quinlisk, T. Shimabukuro, C. Sawhney, C. Brown, and C. W. Lebaron. 2008. Mumps vaccination coverage and vaccine effectiveness in a large outbreak among college students--Iowa, 2006. Vaccine. 26:3601-3607.

Return to footnote 36 referrer

Footnote 37

Dyer, O. 2017. Mumps epidemic in North America proves unusually stubborn. BMJ. 359:j5305.

Return to footnote 37 referrer

Footnote 38

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2006. Mumps Outbreak at a Summer Camp—New York, 2005. JAMA. 295:1637-1638.

Return to footnote 38 referrer

Footnote 39

Fields V.S., Safi H., Waters C., Dillaha J., Capelle L., Riklon S., Wheeler J.G., and Haselow D.T. 2019. Mumps in a highly vaccinated Marshallese community in Arkansas, USA: an outbreak report. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19:185-192.

Return to footnote 39 referrer

Footnote 40

Marshall, H. S., and S. Plotkin. 2019. The changing epidemiology of mumps in a high vaccination era. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19:118-119.

Return to footnote 40 referrer

Footnote 41

Lopez-Perea, N., J. Masa-Calles, M. V. Torres de Mier, A. Fernandez-Garcia, J. E. Echevarria, F. De Ory, and M. V. Martinez de Aragon. 2017. Shift within age-groups of mumps incidence, hospitalizations and severe complications in a highly vaccinated population. Spain, 1998-2014. Vaccine. 35:4339-4345.

Return to footnote 41 referrer

Footnote 42

Vygen, S., A. Fischer, L. Meurice, I. Mounchetrou Njoya, M. Gregoris, B. Ndiaye, A. Ghenassia, I. Poujol, J. P. Stahl, D. Antona, Y. Le Strat, D. Levy-Bruhl, and P. Rolland. 2016. Waning immunity against mumps in vaccinated young adults, France 2013. Euro Surveill. 21:30156-7917.ES.2016.21.10.30156.

Return to footnote 42 referrer

Footnote 43

Su, S. B., H. L. Chang, and A. K. Chen. 2020. Current Status of Mumps Virus Infection: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Vaccine. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17:1686.

Return to footnote 43 referrer

Footnote 44

Pickar, A., P. Xu, A. Elson, J. Zengel, C. Sauder, S. Rubin, and B. He. 2017. Establishing a small animal model for evaluating protective immunity against mumps virus. PLoS One. 12:e0174444.

Return to footnote 44 referrer

Footnote 45

Johnson, C. D., and E. W. Goodpasture. 1934. An Investigation of the Etiology of Mumps. J. Exp. Med. 59:1-19.

Return to footnote 45 referrer

Footnote 46

Saika, S., M. Kidokoro, T. Ohkawa, A. Aoki, and K. Suzuki. 2002. Pathogenicity of mumps virus in the marmoset. J. Med. Virol. 66:115-122.

Return to footnote 46 referrer

Footnote 47

Wolinsky, J. S., and W. G. Stroop. 1978. Virulence and persistence of three prototype strains of mumps virus in newborn hamsters. Arch. Virol. 57:355-359.

Return to footnote 47 referrer

Footnote 48

Latner, D. R., and C. J. Hickman. 2015. Remembering mumps. PLoS Pathog. 11:e1004791.

Return to footnote 48 referrer

Footnote 49

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2009. Updated Recommendations for Isolation of Persons With Mumps. JAMA. 301:1648-1649.

Return to footnote 49 referrer

Footnote 50

Lam, E., Rosen, J. B., and Zucker, J. R. 2020. Mumps: an Update on Outbreaks, Vaccine Efficacy, and Genomic Diversity. Clin Microbiol Rev 33:e00151-19.

Return to footnote 50 referrer

Footnote 51

Polgreen, P. M., L. C. Bohnett, J. E. Cavanaugh, S. B. Gingerich, L. E. Desjardin, M. L. Harris, M. P. Quinlisk, and M. A. Pentella. 2008. The duration of mumps virus shedding after the onset of symptoms. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:1447-1449.

Return to footnote 51 referrer

Footnote 52

Tang, J. W., Y. Li, I. Eames, P. K. Chan, and G. L. Ridgway. 2006. Factors involved in the aerosol transmission of infection and control of ventilation in healthcare premises. J. Hosp. Infect. 64:100-114.

Return to footnote 52 referrer

Footnote 53

McCammon, J. R., and V. W. Riesser. 1979. Effects of ribavirin on BHK-21 cells acutely or persistently infected with mumps virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 15:356-360.

Return to footnote 53 referrer

Footnote 54

Junli, H., W. Li, R. Nenqi, L. X. Li, S. R. Fun, and Y. Guanle. 1997. Disinfection effect of chlorine dioxide on viruses, algae and animal planktons in water. Water Research. 31:455-460.

Return to footnote 54 referrer

Footnote 55

Kowalski, W. 2012. Disinfection of the Inanimate Environment, p. 139. W. Kowalski (ed.), Hospital Airborne Infection Control. CRC Press.

Return to footnote 55 referrer

Footnote 56

Walther, B. A., and P. W. Ewald. 2004. Pathogen survival in the external environment and the evolution of virulence. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 79:849-869.

Return to footnote 56 referrer

Footnote 57

Cusi, M. G., S. Bianchi, M. Valassina, L. Santini, M. Arnetoli, and P. E. Valensin. 1996. Rapid detection and typing of circulating mumps virus by reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction. Res. Virol. 147:227-232.

Return to footnote 57 referrer

Footnote 58

Poggio, G. P., C. Rodriguez, D. Cisterna, M. C. Freire, and J. Cello. 2000. Nested PCR for rapid detection of mumps virus in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with neurological diseases. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:274-278.

Return to footnote 58 referrer

Footnote 59

Barbel, P., K. Peterson, and E. Heavey. 2017. Mumps makes a comeback: What nurses need to know. Nursing. 47:15-17.

Return to footnote 59 referrer

Footnote 60

World Health Organization. 2018. Immunization coverage. 2019.

Return to footnote 60 referrer

Footnote 61

Government of Canada. Aug 2021. Mumps vaccines : Canadian Immunization Guide. Feb 2024

Return to footnote 61 referrer

Footnote 62

Marin, M., M. Marlow, K. L. Moore, and M. Patel. 2018. Recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Use of a Third Dose of Mumps Virus-Containing Vaccine in Persons at Increased Risk for Mumps During an Outbreak. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 67:33.

Return to footnote 62 referrer

Footnote 63

Sewell, D. L. 1995. Laboratory-associated infections and biosafety. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:389-405.

Return to footnote 63 referrer

Footnote 64

Wedum, A. G. 1997. History & Epidemiology of Laboratory-Acquired Infections. J Am Biol Saf Assoc. 2:12.

Return to footnote 64 referrer

Footnote 65

Overman, J. R. 1958. Viremia in human mumps virus infections. AMA Arch. Intern. Med. 102:354.

Return to footnote 65 referrer

Footnote 66

Tellier, R. 2006. Review of Aerosol Transmission of Influenza A Virus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:1657-1662.

Return to footnote 66 referrer

Footnote 67

Government of Canada. 2018. ePATHogen - Risk Group Database. 2024. Available at https://health.canada.ca/en/epathogen.

Return to footnote 67 referrer

Footnote 68

Public Health Agency of Canada. 2018. Human Pathogens and Toxins Act (HPTA) (S.C. 2009, c.24).

Return to footnote 68 referrer

Page details

Date modified: