Independent Advisory Board on Eligibility for Journalism Tax Measures - Annual Report 2020-2021
Table of contents
- Message from the Minister of National Revenue
- Word from the Chair
- Tax measures to support journalism
- Timeline of implementation
- Board Members
- The Board’s mandate
- Board secretariat
- Review process
- Looking ahead
- Abbreviations and acronyms used in the report
Message from the Minister of National Revenue
I am pleased to receive the first Annual Report (2020-2021) of the Independent Advisory Board on Eligibility for Journalism Tax Measures (Board). Over the past year, the members of the Board have worked determinedly to fulfill their mandate in making recommendations to the Minister on whether organizations meet certain criteria for designation as qualified Canadian journalism organizations. The Annual Report makes clear our shared commitment to supporting Canada’s journalism industry, including during the unprecedented times we have faced over the past year.
Media freedom plays a vital role in a well-functioning democracy, by igniting dialogue and sharing knowledge, to keep the public informed. Your work helps support the independent media, and I am tremendously grateful for your expertise, comprehensive advice and recommendations as you continue to fulfill your mandate.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your guidance, and important support for Canadian journalism organizations.
You have my full support as we continue to work together on key priorities over the coming year.
The Honourable Diane Lebouthillier,
Minister of National Revenue
Word from the Chair
The Board began its work in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. The first year of our mandate was completed remotely, including training sessions with the CRA, weekly meetings, reviewing cases and documentation and drafting recommendations. While it was challenging to learn a new job and build a team virtually during a pandemic, it has been a stimulating and rewarding experience for all of us.
The Board’s role is to offer an independent expert assessment on organizations applying for designation as a QCJO, regarding the production of “original news content”, the regular employment of at least two journalists, and the production of content that is not significantly related to an organization or group. All of our assessments are framed strictly within the wording of the Act Footnote 1, with clarification from the Guidance Footnote 2.
A growing number of experts, including in the United States and other democracies strongly committed to press freedom, are embracing the idea that governments can play a role in sustaining news production while preserving editorial independence and capacity for innovation, as the media industry continues its digital transition Footnote 3 Footnote 4 Footnote 5. The tax measures to support Canadian journalism are a pioneering initiative in this area.
The Board has observed firsthand that it is very difficult for smaller organizations, with fewer staff, less advertising, smaller papers, to continue providing local news coverage. The Board sometimes reviewed submissions from publications that no longer exist due to declining advertising revenue and the economics of an increasingly fragmented market — a trend that has accelerated during the pandemic. It is clear that Canada’s media landscape is shrinking at a shocking rate. Communities throughout Canada are affected by this. A number of local newsrooms closed permanently in the spring of 2020 and many more “temporary” closures and layoffs remain undetermined Footnote 6.
Still, the Board was impressed by the ability of many news organizations to keep reporting and telling stories, not only about the pandemic and its impact on our lives, but also other topics and issues that matter to Canadians and communities.
In the last several years, statistics have shown, and the news media itself has consistently reported, that the journalism industry is in crisis.
While multiple factors can be identified for this crisis, including the evolution of technology and the decrease in advertising revenue, the “solution” has been debated at length.
One thing that can be generally agreed upon, as highlighted in the 2019 federal budget Footnote 7, is that “Now more than ever, a strong and independent news media is crucial to supporting an informed public and a well-functioning democracy.” Footnote 8 The income tax measures to support journalism were intended to do that.
This inaugural annual report offers an overview of the operations of the Board, whose mandate is to provide independent advice to the Minister on the tax measures to support journalism. This report comprises the period from March 24, 2020, to March 31, 2021. Subsequent reports will cover fiscal year operations.
Tax measures to support journalism
The 2019 federal budget announced three income tax measures to support journalism:
- Canadian journalism labour tax credit — a 25% refundable labour tax credit for salary or wages payable in respect of an eligible newsroom employee on or after January 1, 2019
- Digital news subscription tax credit — a 15% non-refundable personal income tax credit to allow individuals to claim digital news subscription costs paid to a qualifying organization after 2019 and before 2025
- Registered journalism organization — a new type of qualified donee for not-for-profit journalism organizations, beginning on January 1, 2020
To be eligible for these measures, an organization must first be designated as a QCJO. While designation as a QCJO does not automatically entitle organizations to specific tax measures, it is the necessary first step in determining if any of the three income tax measures could apply.
The legislation contemplated that an independent board would offer non-binding expert recommendations in respect of certain aspects of the QCJO designation. The Journalism and Written Media Independent Panel of Experts agreed with the principle set out in the legislation that the Minister was to rely on the recommendation of an advisory board and formally recommend the establishment of such a Board Footnote 9 Footnote 10 Footnote 11.
Timeline of implementation
|The 2019 federal budget announces three income tax measures to provide support to Canadian journalism organizations producing original news content.|
|Establishment of the Journalism and Written Media Independent Panel of Experts to provide recommendations and guidance to the Ministers of Canadian Heritage and Finance on the implementation of the measures.|
|Bill C-97 receives Royal Assent and the income tax measures to provide support to Canadian journalism organizations are enacted.|
|Journalism and Written Media Independent Panel of Experts submits its report to the Ministers of Canadian Heritage and Finance.|
|The Minister of National Revenue announces that an independent advisory board will be established to make recommendations on whether an organization meets certain criteria for QCJO designation.|
|The CRA publishes guidance and an application form in connection with the QCJO designation program.|
|Establishment of the Independent Advisory Board on Eligibility for Journalism Tax Measures through Order in Council.|
|Release of draft legislative proposals to make adjustments to the journalism tax measures to ensure they achieve their objectives.|
Board members were selected with consideration given to the linguistic, regional, and ethnic diversity of the country.
While their experience varies from community weeklies to big-city dailies, broadcasting, academia, and management, they all share a love for journalism, and each brings to their role a wide range of skills and perspectives on Canadian journalism.
Board members’ expertise, knowledge of, and passion for journalism makes for a stronger whole when it comes to fulfilling their role.
Pictures, names and titles of each member appear around a map of Canada. An arrow points to the city where they are located.
First picture on the left hand side of the map is Margo Goodhand, member of the Board, with an arrow pointing toward Victoria, British Columbia.
Second picture above the map is Colette Brin, Chair of the Board, with an arrow pointing toward Québec, Québec.
Third picture on the right hand side of the map is Kim Kierans, Vice-Chair of the Board, with an arrow pointing toward Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Fourth picture underneath the map, on the right hand side, is Pierre-Paul Noreau, member of the Board, with an arrow pointing toward Québec, Québec.
Fifth picture underneath the map shows Karim H. Karim, member of the Board, with an arrow pointing toward Ottawa, Ontario.
Colette Brin, Chair
Kim Kierans, Vice-Chair
Margo Goodhand, member
Pierre-Paul Noreau, member
Karim Karim, member
|Professor, Département d’information et de communication, Université Laval, Québec
Director, Centre d’études sur les médias, Québec
Former journalist, La Liberté and Radio-Canada, Manitoba
|Professor, School of Journalism, University of King’s College, Halifax
Visiting professor, Asian Center for Journalism, Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines
Former Reporter, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
|Margo Goodhand||Vice-President, Michener Awards Foundation, and Chief Judge, Michener Awards, Ottawa
Former Governor, National Newspaper Awards
Former Editor, Winnipeg Free Press
Former Editor, Edmonton Journal
|Pierre-Paul Noreau||President, Michener Awards Foundation, Ottawa
Former President and Publisher, Le Droit, Ottawa
Former Vice-President and Associate Publisher, Le Soleil, Québec
Former Member of the Boards of Directors of News Media Canada, Conseil de Presse du Québec et Fédération professionnelle des journalistes du Québec
|Karim H. Karim||Professor and former Director, School of Journalism and Communication, Carleton University, Ottawa
Director, Carleton Centre for the Study of Islam, Ottawa
Member of the Boards of Canadian Journal of Communication and Global Media Journal – Canadian Edition
Former Director, Institute of Ismaili Studies, London (UK)
The Board’s mandate
The mandate of the Board is to:
- provide an independent assessment and non-binding recommendation to the Minister as to whether an organization that applies for the designation referred to in paragraph (b) of the definition of QCJO in subsection 248(1) of the Act satisfies the conditions set out in subparagraphs (a)(v), (vi) and (vii) of that definition
- provide advice on any other matter relating to any journalism tax measures that the Minister refers to the Board
The CRA is responsible for administering the tax measures to support Canadian journalism organizations.
The “gateway” for eligibility for all of the income tax measures is for an organization to first be designated as a QCJO.
The Board reviews applications for QCJO designation and makes recommendations to the CRA on whether or not the organization meets certain criteria to be designated as a QCJO.
As set out in the OIC, the CRA provides full secretariat services to support the work of the Board. The Board secretariat is the liaison between the Board and the CRA and assists with the Board’s administration, logistics, and coordination. The Board secretariat:
- sends recommendation requests from the CRA to the Board
- follows up when necessary and receives each recommendation once completed
- organizes and attends meetings of the Board
- supports the Chair and Vice-Chair in fulfilling their roles
Board members are bound by the confidentiality provisions of the Act, the Access to Information Act, and the Privacy Act. Therefore, the members have a legal obligation to safeguard the confidentiality and integrity of taxpayer information to which they have access.
To fulfill its mandate, the Board reviews all requests for recommendation referred to it by the CRA.
Requests sent to the Board for recommendation go through the following process:
A flow chart describes the request for recommendation process
Box one: Organization sends QCJO application to the CRA
Box two: The CRA reviews application
Box three: The CRA requests a written, non-binding recommendation from the Board
Box four: The Board may ask the CRA for clarification
Box five: The Board reviews application and drafts analysis and recommendation
Box six: Analysis and recommendation discussed at Board meeting
Box seven: Final recommendation reached by consensus of the Board and signed by the Chair or Vice-Chair
Box eight: The Board sends written non-binding recommendation to the CRA
Box nine: The CRA completes its review and sends final decision to organization
In spite of all of today’s challenges, there are still some truly great newsrooms out there, serving Canadian communities big and small, legacy and online start-ups.
As part of its analysis the Board reviews a sample of editions of an applicant organization’s publications, including the organization’s online publications, where applicable. The sample may be identified by the organization in its application, or chosen by the CRA or the Board.
The length of time required for the review and recommendation is dependent on several factors. For instance, the Board may require more time when an organization has a large number of publications, or, if the material reviewed is insufficient to allow the Board to provide a recommendation. In such a case, the Board requests that the CRA obtain more information from the organization.
While there are several criteria that must be met for QCJO designation, as set out in the Act, the Board’s review considers the following:
Engaged in the production of original news content, which is:
- primarily (50% or more) focused on matters of general interest and reports of current events, including coverage of democratic institutions and processes
- not primarily (50% or more) focused on a particular topic
Regularly employs two or more journalists who deal at arm’s length with the organization
Is not significantly engaged in the production of content:
- to promote the interests, or report on the activities, of an organization, an association or its members
- for a government, Crown corporation or government agency
The Board’s assessment of an organization’s production of the ONC criterion is based on the widely accepted journalistic processes and principles set out in the Guidance.
Journalistic processes and principles
- a commitment to researching and verifying information before publication
- a consistent practice of providing rebuttal opportunity for those being criticized and presenting alternate perspectives, interpretations and analyses
- an honest representation of sources
- a practice of correcting errors
Between March 24, 2020, and March 31, 2021, the Board has received and has returned to the CRA a total of 159 requests for recommendation. Of those, 157 recommendations were QCJO designation applications; and 2 were RJO applications.
Requests for recommendation received by the Board in 2020-2021
In April and May 2020, following the appointment of the Board members, the CRA provided onboarding, during which they obtained their work equipment, attended training and developed their case review process. The Board began issuing recommendations in June 2020.
During its first year, the Board met on a weekly basis, sometimes twice in a week depending on the workload. Since its creation, the Board has met 55 times.
Monthly number of cases sent to the Board in 2020-2021
A vertical bar chart named “Monthly number of cases sent to the Board in 2020-2021” shows a Y axis marked by 10 and an X axis containing all months from April 2020 to March 2021. Each column shows the number of QCJO and RJO cases sent to the Board by month.
April has 0 QCJO and 0 RJO
May has 0 QCJO and 0 RJO
June has 12 QCJO and 0 RJO
July has 8 QCJO and 1 RJO
August has 18 QCJO and 0 RJO
September has 11 QCJO and 0 RJO
October has 20 QCJO and 0 RJO
November has 48 QCJO and 0 RJO
December has 9 QCJO and 0 RJO
January has 8 QCJO and 0 RJO
February has 8 QCJO and 1 RJO
March has 15 QCJO and 0 RJO
The requests for recommendation to the Board, whether for QCJO or RJO, comprised of applications from organizations situated across Canada. Of the requests for recommendations received, 122 requests were submitted in English and 37 in French. The recommendations of the Board are prepared in the language of the application.
Language in which requests for recommendation were received — 2020-2021
Number of QCJO requests for recommendation received by the Board per province of organization in 2020-2021
A vertical bar chart named “Number of QCJO requests for recommendation received by the Board per province of organization in 2020-2021” shows the province or territory where the QCJO applications came from.
British Columbia indicates 36 requests
Alberta indicates 10 requests
Saskatchewan indicates 5 requests
Manitoba indicates 7 requests
Ontario indicates 48 requests
Quebec indicates 40 requests
New Brunswick indicates 3 requests
Nova Scotia indicates 5 requests
Prince Edward Island indicates 0 requests
Newfoundland and Labrador indicates 2 requests
Northwest Territories indicates 1 request
Yukon indicates 0 requests
Nunavut indicates 0 requests
Of the 157 QCJO applications reviewed by the Board, 65 were considered by the CRA to be of low complexity, 61 were medium complexity and 31 were high complexity. Complexity ratings are assigned by the CRA based on an application as a whole. This includes different criteria, such as the number of publications, and whether a translation is required to review the material (for publications in languages other than English or French).
Complexity of cases received for recommendation in 2020-2021
Going forward, the Board remains committed to supporting Canadian journalism organizations in these unprecedented times. To build on the highest standards of service in this coming year, the Board aims to issue a recommendation to the CRA within general timelines. The Board’s timelines will depend on the complexity of each case. As mentioned above, the Board’s involvement in a case is only one part of the entire QCJO designation review process. Therefore, these timelines below represent only the Board’s work.
Board’s timelines for issuing a recommendation in 2021-2022
Based on the complexity of applications
The infographic shows the Board’s timelines for issuing a recommendation in 2021-2022, based on the complexity of applications
Arrow one: CRA reviews application
Arrow two: Low complexity, 7 days
Arrow three: Medium complexity, 10 days
Arrow four: High complexity, 14 days
Arrow five: CRA completes its review
It is a privilege and a great responsibility for the Board to play an advisory role in the tax measures to support journalism. Journalism remains a pillar of democracy in communities across Canada.
Having read thousands of articles from hundreds of publications, in print and digital formats, from coast to coast to coast, we now not only have a better sense of the journalistic landscape in Canada, but of the country itself. For that, we are grateful, as well as for the constant support and professionalism of the Secretariat at the CRA.
Abbreviations and acronyms used in the report
For ease of reference, the following abbreviations and acronyms are used in this report:
|Act||Income Tax Act|
|Board||Independent Advisory Board on Eligibility for Journalism Tax Measures|
|Board members||Members of the Board appointed by way of Order in Council|
|Chair||Chair of the Board|
|CRA||Canada Revenue Agency|
|Guidance||Guidance on income tax measures to support journalism|
|Minister||Minister of National Revenue|
|ONC||Original news content|
|QCJO||Qualified Canadian journalism organization|
|OIC||Order in Council of March 2020, establishing the Board|
|RJO||Registered journalism organization|
|Vice-Chair||Vice-Chair of the Board|
Report a problem or mistake on this page
- Date modified: